DOCSLIB.ORG

RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper Unmanned Aerial Vehicles June 2020 Program Briefing The RQ-1A Predator was the US Air Force’s first medium endurance UAV. The Predator stemmed from the CIA's earlier Tier 1 Medium En- durance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (MAE-UAV) that was deployed for surveillance missions over the for- mer Yugoslavia in 1993-94. It was based on the General Atomics Gnat for research purposes. In its hunter- The Predator is a contender in a vari- 750 air vehicle. killer version for the Air Force, it is ety of foreign competitions; the The upgraded version, the Gnat- designated as the MQ-9A Reaper. Netherlands and Spain have been 750-TE Predator won the DoD’s Tier The Air Force had been acquiring the cleared for sales. General Atomics 2 competition with a development MQ-9A alongside the MQ-1A Pred- has developed the Predator-XP ex- award in January 1994 and in 1997 ator but in 2009 decided to shift en- port variant to make it more suitable was redesignated as the RQ-1A Pred- tirely to the Reaper. Procurement for export and likely candidates in- ator. The Predator was first deployed through FY11 was 130 air vehicles. clude the UAE and Saudi Arabia. over Bosnia in the summer of 1995. Under the FY21 budget plan, the General Atomics and Lockheed The US Air Force assumed opera- USAF objective is 419 aircraft with Martin teamed to offer a derivative of tional control of the Predator on 2 new procurement continuing through the Predator called the Mariner September 1996. The armed version FY20. (a.k.a. Predator B-ER) as a contender of the RQ-1 Predator is designated as The US Army awarded a contract for the US Navy’s BAMS (Broad the MQ-1B Predator A. in May 2003 for 3 IGNAT UAVs Area Mission Surveillance) require- The first series production con- based on the Predator to help define ment but it lost to the Global Hawk in tract was awarded to General Atom- its UAV requirements for a divi- April 2008.The Predator-B version ics on 20 August 1997. The US Air sional/corps level UAV called the was selected by NASA’s Earth Sci- Force had a requirement for 12 sys- Extended Range Multipurpose UAV ence Enterprise for research applica- tems and 101 air vehicles, but this (ERMP). A Predator derivative tions as the Altair and first flew in number steadily increased and to- called MQ-1C Grey Eagle (formerly June 2003; it was the first civil UAV taled 320 through FY10. General Sky Warrior) won the Army ERMP to win an FAA airworthiness certifi- th Atomics delivered its 100 Predator competition in 2005 against the cate which facilitates its use in na- on 5 February 2004. In 2007, the Air Hunter II, a derivative of the Israeli tional airspace. The Predator is also force reported it had lost about 49 of Heron. The Army plans to acquire used by the Border Patrol with eight 90 operational Predators due to com- 277 air vehicles through FY20. in service by 2012. General Atomics bat and accidents. In 2009, the Air The US Marine Corps in 2018 de- has developed a jet-powered deriva- Force announced plans to terminate cided to begin to acquire the MQ-9 tive of the Predator, called Predator MQ-1 Predator acquisition in favor Reaper based on experiences in the C and Avenger, for the USAF MQ- of switching entirely to the MQ-9 use of USAF aircraft in Afghanistan. X Next Generation UAS program Reaper. The final MQ-1 Predator was A total of two were funded in 2020. and a navalized version called Sea delivered to the Air Force on 3 March Italy became the first export cus- Avenger for the US Navy UCLASS/ 2011 with about 320 delivered. Pro- tomer for Predator. Britain leased and CBARS requirement (see MQ-25 duction of the Predator A ended in borrowed Predators for operations in Stingray report). The US Air Force early 2016 after delivery of two Ital- Iraq in early 2004 and in 2006 or- began acquiring small numbers of ian aircraft. The US Air Force in dered two air vehicles, followed by this version in 2011. General Atom- 2016 announced that the last of the an order for the RQ-9 Reaper in 2007 ics has also proposed an extended- MQ-1 Predator force would be re- with plans to deploy two squadrons; range version of Reaper. tired by 2018. further orders were made in 2016 un- A new version of the Predator was der the Protector program. France be- announced in 2000, the Predator-B gan acquiring the Reaper in 2013. which was first acquired by NASA World Missiles & UAVs Briefing ©Teal Group Corporation RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper Page 2 Executive Big Safari Program Office Aeronautical Systems Center Air Force Materiel Command Wright Patterson AFB, OH The Tier 1 element of this program was managed by the Central Intelligence Agency. Manufacturer General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Div. PO Box 85608 San Diego, CA 92186-9784 tel: (619) 455-4649 Variants RQ-1A Predator—This is the desig- MQ-1C Grey Eagle Block 1—This which remained in production nation for the baseline system, in- is the baseline Army version of the through 2003 when the FY02 aircraft cluding the RQ-1K air vehicle. Predator and first flew in December shifted to Block 10 configuration. DERF funding from FY02 is being 2007. This Predator variant for the The Block 20 configuration intro- used to reconfigure all RQ-1A sys- Army uses the AAI “One System” as duces wingtip extensions for better tems into the MQ-1B configuration. its GCS. Each system includes 12 air hot/high operations. vehicles, five GCS and associated RQ-1B Predator—This is the Block MQ-9A Reaper Spiral 0—Formerly equipment. 1 system using the improved RQ-1L Predator-B, this is the enlarged ver- air vehicle. MQ-1C Improved Grey Eagle— sion of the UAV and the baseline ver- This is the upgraded version first sion of the new type. MQ-1B Predator—This is the up- flown in July 2013 with 50% more graded RQ-1B system which enables MQ-9A Reaper Spiral 1—This is fuel capacity and powered by a Ly- the air vehicle to employ the Hellfire version integrated the Hellfire mis- coming DEL-120 diesel. missile. sile system on the platform. RQ-1K Block 5 Predator—This is MQ-1C Warrior Block 0—This is MQ-9A Reaper Spiral 2—This is the baseline version of the UAV used the Army version of the Predator, in- the improved version with higher in the reconnaissance role. troduced as a stop gap in 2007 before gross weight, redundant flight avion- the baseline Block 1 was available. It MQ-1L Predator Block 10—This is ics, digitally controlled engine, sen- has many of the same features as the the upgraded version of the RQ-1K sor and stores management com- Block 1 but uses the USAF/General Block 5 modified to carry and launch puter, MIL-STD-1760 data bus and Atomics GCS rather than the AAI the Hellfire missile in the hunter- improved human-machine interface. One System GCS, uses a C-band killer role. This was officially ac- data-link instead of the faster high cepted for service use in February data rate Tactical Common Data- 2005 several years after having actu- Link, lacks the automatic landing ally gone into action. The initial pro- system and some other features. duction standard was called Block 5 Subsystems Launch System Launcher Launch uses a conventional under- A study conducted in 1996 by Si- The Gnat-750 uses conventional carriage. Up to 1997, the Predator erra Nevada Corp. concluded that the aircraft-style launch and landing. had a mean time between crashes of Predator could be integrated into the 1,500 to 1,700 flight hours. UAV Common Automatic Recovery World Missiles & UAVs Briefing ©Teal Group Corporation RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper Page 3 System (U-CARS). General Atomic launch the Predator from aircraft car- tional aircraft. A Predator system in- completed a three-year study of the riers. cludes one Ground Control Station electro-magnetic aircraft launch sys- The Predator/Reaper takes off and (GCS), four air vehicles, a Trojan tem (EMALS) for potential use to lands from a runway like a conven- Sprit II communications suite and 635 personnel. Electronics Sensors lb. The Skyball electro-optical pay- in the SEAD role to improve the col- The Tier 1 Gnat-750 is remotely load includes a 14TS imaging infra- lection of data on enemy SAMs. piloted with several options. The red camera and daylight camera pro- The RQ-1A system uses a UAV can be preprogrammed for au- vided by Versatron/Wescam. Northrop Grumman AN/ZPQ-1 TE- tonomous operations and can incor- The four of the original MQ-1B SAR tactical endurance synthetic ap- porate a GPS/INS option for im- Predator hunter-killers were fitted erture radar. The TESAR operates in proved accuracy. The datalink for with the AN/AAS-44 “Kosovo Ball”, the Ku-band with a swath width of flight control is a C-band, frequency an E/O sensor package with integral 800m, a resolution of 0.3 m, a range selectable system with an optional laser rangefinder in June 1999. Alt- of four to 11 km, and an MTBF of digital video channel. The data link hough some consideration was given 700 hours. A total of 27 ZPQ-1 were antenna on the Tier 1 was located in to fitting the remainder of the RQ-1 funded in FY98 and 24 in FY99 with a tear-drop-shaped pod over the fuse- fleet with this, instead, the plan was all but six supplied prior to 1 October lage, developed by a team of to use the Raytheon AN/AAS-52 2001.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Designing Unmanned Aircraft Systems: a Comprehensive Approach
    Designing Unmanned Aircraft Systems: A Comprehensive Approach Jay Gundlach Aurora Flight Sciences Manassas, Virginia AIAA EDUCATION SERIES Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-4344 NOMENCLATURE Item Definition A area; availability; ground area covered in a mission; radar antenna area, m2; conversion between radians and minutes of arc Aa achieved availability Abound bounded area for a closed section 2 Ad IR detector sensitive area, m 2 Aeff effective antenna area, length Ai inherent availability AO operational availability; UA availability 2 Ap propeller disk area, length ARate area coverage rate Ar effective collection area of optical receiver ASurf surface area AR aspect ratio ARWet wetted aspect ratio AR0 aspect ratio along spanwise path a UA acceleration; maximum fuselage cross-section width; speed of sound; detector characteristic dimension awa radar mainlobe width metric awr radar mainlobe width metric ax acceleration along the x direction (acceleration) B acuity gain due to binoculars; boom area; effective noise bandwidth of receiving process, Hz 21 BDoppler Doppler bandwidth (time ) BN effective noise bandwidth of the receiving process 21 BT radar signal bandwidth (time ) BSFCSL brake specific fuel consumption at sea level b web length; wing span; maximum fuselage cross- section height bw wing span b0 span without dihedral C cost of contractor
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 2005, Accessed Oct
    i National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ikhana Unmanned Aircraft System Western States Fire Missions Peter W. Merlin National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Office Washington, D.C. 2009 ii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Merlin, Peter W., 1964- Ikhana Unmanned Aircraft System : Western States fire missions / by Peter W. Merlin. p. cm. “August 2009.” 1. Aeronautics in forest fire control--West (U.S.) 2. Aerial photography in forestry--West (U.S.) 3. Drone aircraft. 4. Predator (Drone aircraft) 5. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I. Title. SD421.43.M47 2009 634.9’6180978--dc22 iii Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. IV Preface ...................................................................................................................................................V Introduction .......................................................................................................................................VII Chapter One ...........................................................................................................................................1 Don’t Fear the Reaper Chapter Two .........................................................................................................................................19 Chariots of Fire Chapter Three .......................................................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Considerations for Operation of Uavs in the NAS
    SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM Roland E. Weibel and R. John Hansman Report No. ICAT-2005-1 March 2005 MIT International Center for Air Transportation Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 USA 2 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM by Roland E. Weibel and R. John Hansman Abstract There is currently a broad effort underway in the United States and internationally by several organizations to craft regulations enabling the safe operation of UAVs in the NAS. Current federal regulations governing unmanned aircraft are limited in scope, and the lack of regulations is a barrier to achieving the full potential benefit of UAV operations. To inform future FAA regulations, an investigation of the safety considerations for UAV operation in the NAS was performed. Key issues relevant to operations in the NAS, including performance and operating architecture were examined, as well as current rules and regulations governing unmanned aircraft. In integrating UAV operations in the NAS, it will be important to consider the implications of different levels of vehicle control and autonomous capability and the source of traffic surveillance in the system. A system safety analysis was performed according to FAA system safety guidelines for two critical hazards in UAV operation: midair collision and ground impact. Event-based models were developed describing the likelihood of ground fatalities and midair collisions under several assumptions. From the models, a risk analysis was performed calculating the expected level of safety for each hazard without mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unmanned Aircraft System for Maritime Search and Rescue
    An Unmanned Aircraft System for Maritime Search and Rescue by Andre Paul Meredith Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof Thomas Jones Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering March 2011 Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2011 Copyright © 2011 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Abstract Search and Rescue is an essential service provided by States and Militaries to search for, locate and rescue survivors of accidents and incidents. Civil Search and Rescue utilizes a system of well-trained professionals or volunteers, an effective Search and Rescue organization, supported by industry and other providers of infrastructure and assets. The service is rendered to save the lives of civilian individuals in imminent danger of losing their lives. Military (Combat) Search and Rescue is provided by militaries to save the lives of military practitioners in a similar predicament. In addition, Search and Rescue is performed over land and over the sea. All forms of Search and Rescue rely on capable, specialized assets for efficiency en affectivity. Assets are specified and chosen on the grounds of various factors, amongst others operating environment, operational profile, performance and special abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Tecnologie E Prospettive Future
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna SCUOLA DI SCIENZE Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Informatica Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: tecnologie e prospettive future Relatore: Presentata da: Luciano Bononi Marcello Allegretti Correlatore: Giampiero Giacomello Sessione II Anno Accademico 2015 - 2016 Quale è la vera vittoria? – Quella su se stessi Prima regola dell’Aikido Abstract Partendo dalla definizione di UAV e UAS, arrivando a quella di drone, nella tesi saranno definiti i termini precedenti, ossia un sistema aereo senza pilota a bordo, la nascita del termine drone e le tendenze attuali. Dopo una precisa classificazione nelle quattro categorie principali (droni per hobbisti, commerciali e militari di me- dia grandezza, militari specifici di grandi dimensioni e stealth da combattimento) saranno descritti gli ambiti di utilizzo: da un lato quello militare e della sicurez- za, dall’altro quello civile e scientifico. I capitoli centrali della tesi saranno il cuore dell’opera: l’architettura dell’UAV sarà descritta analizzando la totalità delle sue componenti, sia hardware che software. Verranno, quindi, analizzati i problemi re- lativi alla sicurezza, focalizzandosi sull’hacking di un UAV, illustrandone le varie tecniche e contromisure (tra cui anche come nascondersi da un drone). Il lavoro della tesi prosegue nei capitoli successivi con un’attenta trattazione della normativa vigente e dell’etica dei droni (nonché del diritto ad uccidere con tali sistemi). Il capitolo relativo alla tecnologia stealth sarà importante per capire le modalità di occultamento, le tendenze attuali e i possibili sviluppi futuri degli UAV militari da combattimento. Il capitolo finale sugli sviluppi futuri esporrà le migliorie tecno- logiche e gli obiettivi degli UAV negli anni a venire, insieme ad eventuali utilizzi sia militari che civili.
    [Show full text]