DOCSLIB.ORG

Founded in 1813, the Supreme Court of Louisiana Has Fashioned And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Founded in 1813, the Supreme Court of Louisiana Has Fashioned And The Supreme Court of Louisiana at 200 This 1901 photograph of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s courtroom at the Cabildo, where the Court sat from 1853-1910, reveals the first known look at the Court’s portrait collection of justices, jurists and other distinguished members of bench and bar. When the Court moved to the 400 Royal Street location, the portraits followed, and are now displayed along the building’s hallways. Image courtesy of the Collections of the Louisiana State Museum. By Dr. Warren M. Billings ounded in 1813, the Supreme Court of Louisiana has fashioned and ornamented state law ever since. Its 200th anniversary bids revisiting how Fit hammered out a regime quite distinct from those in other states and yet very much a part of the federal system that is the American legal order. This essay is such a recollection. 462 April / May 2013 In its original guise, the Court barely tions of Louisiana’s legal system. Initially, sion, the Louisiana equivalent of resembled the one familiar to us. Conceived the Court designed rules for bar admissions, Marbury v. Madison, strengthened as part of an American-style judiciary, it got which qualified newcomers as well as law- the Court with an Anglo-American written into the Constitution of 1812 as a yers who practiced before Louisiana was a tincture, and it guaranteed that the political necessity that assured Louisiana’s state.6 Its subsequent regulations established blending of American, British, French, admission to the Union. None of its architects standards of legal education that lasted until Roman and Spanish law would continue. quite grasped its purposes or its possibili- the 1920s.7 Early on, the judges also nar- That Mathews and Martin wielded such ties. Some perceived it as a threat to their rowed their jurisdiction by deciding they sway says as much about their longevity as legal ways, which sprang from the laws of lacked constitutional warrants to receive their outlook. Younger colleagues — most Spain and France, whereas others saw it as cases from the defunct territorial Superior notably Alexander Porter, Henry Adams a likely device for melding those traditions Court or to hear Bullard, George with American law into a serviceable sys- criminal appeals.8 Strawbridge and tem for the new state. This lack of common Similar questions George Eustis — understanding resulted in the sparest of of jurisdiction held similar views, frameworks for the high court in the new touched the great- but their time on Constitution.1 Up to five judges composed er matter of mix- the high bench that court. As gubernatorial appointees, ing American and was far shorter they kept their seats for life but could be civilian legal pre- and therefore less impeached. Their jurisdiction extended to cepts into a steady, influential than it civil disputes that exceeded $300, and they reliable legal or- otherwise might rode circuit throughout two statewide ap- der. Mathews have been. pellate districts. and Martin, both Architectural Model of the Poor health The Judiciary Act of 1813 added flesh trained American Government House of the French dogged Mathews, to these bones, but only just. It set the size lawyers, likened Colony of Louisiana Martin went blind, of the bench at three judges, any two of civil and common Thompson & Foster, c. 1933 and both stubborn- whom made a quorum. It specified being law to comple- ly resisted efforts “learned in the law” as the sole criterion for mentary facets of The Government House of the French to improve the office and assigned the judges precedence the same legal Colony of Louisiana, home of the French Court’s efficiency. according to the dates of their commissions. gemstone instead Superior Council, was built in 1761 By the 1840s, a Finally, it invested the Court with rulemaking of rivals. For that at Toulouse and Decatur Streets in the combination of authority and power over the lower courts reason, they ac- French Quarter, about 200 feet from the a mountainous and the bar. So long as the judges did not knowledged civil- Mississippi River. After statehood, the backlog of unre- stray beyond these limits, they were free to ian tenets as the Government House was occupied by the solved appeals, 2 conduct themselves as they saw fit. pith of private law Louisiana Legislature and then became the pressure to take With little fanfare, the Court sat for the in Louisiana but Louisiana State Capitol until it burned in criminal appeals, first time on March 1, 1813, at Government looked to other 1828. This model was built by Thompson and a scandal 3 House in New Orleans. Two of its newly sources as well. and Foster in the Louisiana State Museum involving Judge minted judges, Dominick Augustin Hall Moreover, studio in 1933 and aids in preserving the Rice Garland con- and George Mathews, showed up. After a both prided an history of the French Superior Council, the tributed mightily public reading of their commissions from independent ju- first governing body of Louisiana. The first to a statewide out- Gov. William C.C. Claiborne and swear- diciary, so they sitting of the Louisiana Supreme Court was cry that spawned ing the oath of office, they adjourned. The resisted being ex- at Government House on March 1, 1813. the Constitution third judge, Pierre Augustin Bourguignon clusively bound of 1845 and a re- 4 5 Image courtesy of the Collections of the Louisiana Derbigny, joined them a week later. Hall, by by the Civil Code State Museum. formed Supreme virtue of being commissioned first, became of 1825. They Court. Gone was presiding judge. He resigned before the went so far as to the old one, re- year was out, whereupon Mathews became ignore post-1825 repealing statutes that placed by a chief justice and three associ- president and stayed until he died in 1836. invalidated all foreign law in force at the ate justices who served eight-year terms. Derbigny left in 1820 for an unsuccessful time of the Purchase, the Digest of 1808, These justices still rode circuit and retained bid for governor, by which time François- and every territorial or state act that had been supervisory powers, but their jurisdiction Xavier Martin had joined the Court. Martin revised by the Civil Code, which clouded extended to both civil and criminal appeals. remained for 31 years and took the center an already muddled situation. Martin finally George Eustis returned to the Court as its first seat after Mathews’s death. clarified the muddle in 1839 when, in the case chief justice. He oversaw the clearing of the The Court went about adjudicating a of Reynolds v. Swain,9 he asserted the Court’s caseload and instituted a thorough reorga- swelling volume of business that grew after right to say what was law in Louisiana, nization of procedures. The Constitution of 1813, and, as it did, it formed the founda- and who ultimately declared it. His deci- 1852 included no substantive jurisdictional Louisiana Bar Journal Vol. 60, No. 6 463 changes; however, it reduced unlim- galvanized a lengthy campaign to build the efforts at modernization met with his studied ited oral arguments to a total of four Court a permanent home that culminated in resistance, especially after he presided at the hours, it erected an elective judiciary, 1910 with the opening of the massive Beaux impeachment trial of Gov. Huey P. Long in it raised the number of justices from four Arts-style courthouse at 400 Royal Street in 1929. O’Niell devoutly loathed everything to five, and it lengthened their terms from the heart of the French Quarter.14 about the Kingfish, so he regarded modern- eight years to 10.10 Three years later, the Court celebrated its ization as little more than a lightly veiled Civil war and its aftermath wrought a centennial. Speakers — some brief, some attack upon him. He was not wholly wrong Supreme Court of a different sort. After New not — treated an enthusiastic audience to given that modernization’s most persistent Orleans fell to Union troops in April 1862, addresses that touched upon aspects of the advocate was fellow Justice John B. Fournet, Chief Justice Edwin T. Merrick decamped Court’s first 100 a ferocious Long for Opelousas and then to Shreveport, but years. In response, partisan who went the Confederate court did little business that Chief Justice to the Court after we know of. It lost its archives to federal Joseph A. Breaux his highly contro- soldiers who carted them off to Washington, exclaimed that, in versial election in D.C., where they remained in the custody of Louisiana, “two 1934.16 the War Department until the 1880s.11 The systems of law, Fournet made return of white home rule, the coming of civil and common, little headway so Jim Crow, and more structural modifications were blended.” As long as O’Niell characterized the Supreme Court of the post- a result, he contin- stayed, but he Reconstruction years. Constitutional revi- ued, “the labors of did persuade sions in 1864 and 1868 abolished slavery and the bench and bar The Cabildo, where the Court sat from 1853- the Legislature promised civil rights for black Louisianans. of that period are 1910. Provided by Russell Desmond, Arcadian in 1938 to fund Books & Prints. The Court, led by its first native-born Chief still felt. Although the hiring of law Justice John T. Ludeling, re-bounded its a century has clerks as a means jurisprudence accordingly. Not everyone passed, during all of speeding up greeted its alterations kindly, most certainly these years, these the production of not white attorneys who fiercely abominated united systems opinions, and that Ludeling’s rulings on “racial and public of laws, civil and was a first for the questions,” even though the Court’s opinions common, have Court.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jottings of Louisiana
    H&3 Arcs V-sn^i Copyright^ COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. JOTTINGS OF LOUISIANA ILLUSTRATED HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE MOST ILLUSTRIOUS LANDMARKS OF NEW ORLEANS, And the Only Remaining Buildings of Colonial Days. "They do not only form part of the History of the United States, but also of France and Spain." BY WILLIS J. ROUSSEL New Orleans, La. (Copyrighted January 3rd, 1905.; Price, 50 Cents. 1905. Mkndola Bros. Publishers, new orleans, la. LIBRARY of CONGRESS fwo Copies Received FEB 24 1905 , Qopyrigm tmry iUiSS CX* XXc. NO! COPY B. : POETICAL JOTTINGS OF THE HISTORY OF LOUISIANA. —f-f — BY CHARLES UAYARPE The following quotations are taken from the History of Louisiana by Charles Gayarre, the eminent writer and historian, and will no doubt prove to be a very appropriate preface to this work, as it will admit a basis of comparison for "Louisiana as it is to-day." After a masterly and graceful preliminary the learned historian said "I am willing to apply that criterion to Louisiana, considered both physically and historically; I am willing that my native State, which is but a fragrant of what Louisiana formerly was, should stand and fall by that test, and do not fear to approach with her the seat of judgment. I am prepared to show that her history is full of poetry of the highest order, and of the most varied nature. I have studied the subject "con amore," and with such reverential enthusiasm, and I may say with such filial piety, that it has grown upon my heart as well as upon my mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Constitutional Law John Devlin Louisiana State University Law Center
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 48 | Number 2 Developments in the Law, 1986-1987: A Faculty Symposium November 1987 Louisiana Constitutional Law John Devlin Louisiana State University Law Center Repository Citation John Devlin, Louisiana Constitutional Law, 48 La. L. Rev. (1987) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol48/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOUISIANA CONSTITUTIONAL LAW John Devlin* OF REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, MINERAL RIGHTS AND MAXIMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION In this bicentennial year of constitutional celebration and controversial judicial nominations, fundamental questions concerning how courts should go about the task of construing constitutions are much in the air. Such issues of theory and method are as salient, and often as difficult and controversial, when disputed provisions of a state constitution must be construed as they are in the federal context. In two "hard cases" from last term,' State Bond Commissioner v. All Taxpayers,2 and American Lung Association, Inc. v. State Mineral Board,3 the Louisiana Supreme Court wrestled with similar issues of interpre- tation of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution. In both cases, the consti- tutional provisions at issue operated to limit the otherwise plenary powers of the political branches of the state government. In neither case did the plain meaning of the provision's specific terms-"debt" in the former case, "sold" in the latter-necessarily apply to the particular facts at bar, nor in either case did the records of the 1973 constitutional con- vention indicate that the framers ever considered the specific issue pre- sented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Louisiana Purchase
    The Louisiana Purchase In 1803, the United States bought the Louisiana Territory from France, which was in dire straits following their revolution. On the Lewis and Clark site, there is this map of the Louisiana Purchase. As you can see, there was a great deal more of what is now the United States that was not settled. Look at Spanish Florida, New Spain, Oregon Country and British North America. The North West had been the habitat of fur traders, mostly from the British Isles, for many years. Meanwhile, in the South, there was the desire to expel the Spanish from Florida. As American expansionism moved the boundaries further west and south, the British pushed back. Greatness of the Port of New Orleans dates back to the Revolution when the Ohio River Valley was settled, and the settlers had no other way to market their produce then down the river to New Orleans – then a Spanish Port. First they came on rafts then flatboats, and, finally keelboats which could be poled back up the river. (Rafts and flatboats were broken up and the timber sold.) In the early years of this river traffic, tough American boatmen had many a argument with Spanish troops of New Orleans. Here we see Governor Milo halting once such argument. Miro hoped to persuade Tennessee and Kentucky to secede from the United States and join Spanish Louisiana. Instead, the valleyfolks brought such pressure on President Thomas Jefferson that the Louisiana Purchase resulted. An indication of the volume of this early trade between the Americans and the Spaniards at New Orleans is the American dollar.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans Jazz Museum a Gift to the World T H E L Ouisiana M Useum F O U N Datio N C a M P a I G N F O R the New O R Leans J Azz M Useum
    THE LOUISIANA MUSEUM FOUNDATION CAMPAIGN FOR THE NEW ORLEANS JAZZ MUSEUM A GIFT TO THE WORLD T H E L OUISIANA M USEUM F O U N DATIO N C A M P A I G N F O R THE NEW O R LEANS J AZZ M USEUM The Campaign The New Orleans Jazz Museum showcasing Louisiana’s rich history and culture. The Museum Foundation and LSM operates nine museums across the state, with Louisiana State Museum have The Louisiana Museum Foundation (LMF), in support To be housed within the historic Old U.S. Mint five located in New Orleans’ historic French Quarter: joined forces to embrace this ambitious of the Louisiana State Museum (LSM), is engaged in (1838)—strategically located at the intersection the Cabildo, the $2 million capital campaign to build the world’s a $2 million capital campaign to create a world- of the city’s French Quarter (Vieux Carré) and Presbytère, the 1850 newest and best jazz museum. Having raised class New Orleans Jazz Museum. While nearly half Frenchmen Street live music corridor—the New House, Madame nearly half of the required funds, we are now ready of the campaign’s $2 million goal has already Orleans Jazz Museum will place on permanent John’s Legacy, and to move into the public phase of the campaign. been acquired or pledged, your help is needed display the world-renowned New Orleans the Old U.S. Mint. Several unique, high-visibility naming opportunities to complete the funding for this historic project! Jazz Club Collections of the Louisiana Since 1978, the LSM exist for signature supporters, including an overall State Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Louisiana No. 2000-Ob-1360 Alfreda Tillman Bester Versus Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions Or
    2/21/01 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2000-OB-1360 ALFREDA TILLMAN BESTER VERSUS LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DECLARATORY RELIEF TRAYLOR, J.* The petitioner, Alfreda Tillman Bester, seeks to compel the Committee on Bar Admissions, a body of lawyers created to assist this Court in its constitutionally mandated function of deciding who should be admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, to produce her “conditionally failed” February, 2000 Bar Examination, as well as “model answers” or “grading guidelines” prepared by the members of the Committee on Bar Admissions. This demand squarely implicates our inherent authority to regulate all facets of the practice of law in Louisiana, including the admission of persons to the Bar. Because we exercise plenary, inherent authority in the area of bar admissions, and because at the time the subject bar examination was administered, bar applicants had no right to review their bar examinations, or any right to review the grading guidelines or model answers prepared by Committee Examiners, we deny relief. Facts The petitioner was notified by the Committee on Bar Admissions that she had conditionally failed the February, 2000 Louisiana State Bar Examination. * James Gulotta, Associate Justice Pro Tempore, sitting for Lemmon, J. The petitioner then forwarded a written public records request, asking to view her own bar examination, together with the Committee’s model answers/grading guidelines. The Committee on Bar Admissions, acting through counsel, denied the petitioner’s request. Petitioner then invoked the original jurisdiction of this Court by filing a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Injunctive Relief and Declaratory Relief .
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Landmark Nomination Old San Juan
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 OLD SAN JUAN HISTORIC DISTRICT/DISTRITO HISTÓRICO DEL VIEJO SAN JUAN Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Old San Juan Historic District/Distrito Histórico del Viejo San Juan Other Name/Site Number: Ciudad del Puerto Rico; San Juan de Puerto Rico; Viejo San Juan; Old San Juan; Ciudad Capital; Zona Histórica de San Juan; Casco Histórico de San Juan; Antiguo San Juan; San Juan Historic Zone 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Western corner of San Juan Islet. Roughly bounded by Not for publication: Calle de Norzagaray, Avenidas Muñoz Rivera and Ponce de León, Paseo de Covadonga and Calles J. A. Corretejer, Nilita Vientos Gastón, Recinto Sur, Calle de la Tanca and del Comercio. City/Town: San Juan Vicinity: State: Puerto Rico County: San Juan Code: 127 Zip Code: 00901 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): ___ Public-Local: X District: _X_ Public-State: X_ Site: ___ Public-Federal: _X_ Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 699 128 buildings 16 6 sites 39 0 structures 7 19 objects 798 119 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 772 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form ((Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 OLD SAN JUAN HISTORIC DISTRICT/DISTRITO HISTÓRICO DEL VIEJO SAN JUAN Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Plaaces Registration Form 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of the Cabildo
    Architecture of the Cabildo The Cabildo in New Orleans is one of the most historically significant buildings in Louisiana. It was the seat of Spanish colonial government, the site of the Louisiana Purchase transfer ceremony, and home of the Louisiana Supreme Court. It is now part of the Louisiana State Museum. Learn more about the architectural features of this iconic building! Architecture The Cabildo was built 1794-1799 under Spanish rule. It was designed by Gilberto Guillemard in the classical style, which is modelled on the architecture of ancient Greece and Rome. This style was common for eighteenth-century Spanish government buildings and has been used throughout history to convey power and wealth. The wrought-iron balcony railings were created by Marcelino Hernandez, an immigrant from the Canary Islands. The Spanish coat of arms in the pediment was replaced with a patriotic sculpture of an American bald eagle in 1821, a few years after Louisiana became a state, sculpted by Italian artist Pietro Cardelli. In 1847, a third floor with a mansard roof and cupola replaced the original flat roof. This popular French roof style was added in part to match the planned scale of the Pontalba apartment buildings on Jackson Square, which were begun in 1849. These features form an impressive façade that reflect changing influences in New Orleans over time. Architectural terms1 – Use this list of terms to label the drawing of the Cabildo on the next page. • arcade – a series of arches supported by columns • arch – a curved structural element spanning
    [Show full text]
  • May 17, 2021 Sent Via Email House and Governmental Affairs Committee Louisiana House of Representatives Box 94062 Baton Rouge, L
    New York Office Washington, D.C. Office th 40 Rector Street, 5th Floor 700 14 Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 New York, NY 10006-1738 T. (212) 965 2200 F. (212) 226 7592 T. (202) 682 1300 F. (202) 682 1312 www.naacpldf.org May 17, 2021 Sent via email House and Governmental Affairs Committee Louisiana House of Representatives Box 94062 Baton Rouge, LA 70804 Re: Support for Expansion in Louisiana Supreme Court from Seven Single-Member Districts to Nine Single-Member Districts in SB 163 Dear Chairman Stefanski, Vice Chair Duplessis, and Members of the House Governmental Affairs Committee: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (“LDF”) writes to express our support for the proposal in Senate Bill (“SB”) 1631 to place a constitutional amendment on the October 9, 2021 ballot to expand the size of the Louisiana Supreme Court from seven members to nine members, each elected from one district (“single-member district”).2 However, we believe that implementation of this expansion should not be delayed until 2025, as currently proposed in SB 163. It is critical that Louisiana’s communities of color are fairly represented on the Louisiana Supreme Court. The Louisiana Supreme Court has expansive jurisdiction to review judgments of the courts of appeal in every civil and criminal action filed in state court in Louisiana, which is where the vast majority of cases are heard.3 In civil cases, the Supreme Court has plenary authority to review not only legal conclusions, but also may review factual conclusions.4 The decisions made by the Louisiana Supreme Court have profound consequences for all Louisianans and have the potential to affect every aspect of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Louisiana Office of the Judicial Administrator 400 Royal Street, Suite 1190 New Orleans, La 70130-8101
    SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATOR 400 ROYAL STREET, SUITE 1190 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8101 RFP LASC-2018-03 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR TRAINING CONSULTANT FOR THE LOUISIANA PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY ___________________________________________________________________________ I. PURPOSE The Supreme Court of Louisiana, Office of the Judicial Administrator (“Court”) invites qualified Court and Community Liaison in Louisiana to submit proposals to serve as an independent training consultant to the Louisiana Protective Order Registry (“LPOR”). II. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals must be received no later than 4:00 p.m. (CST) on Monday, November 12, 2018. Proposals may be submitted electronically via e-mail or secure file upload or may be submitted in paper format (with one original and three copies required). Proposals should be sent to the following address: The Supreme Court of Louisiana Office of the Judicial Administrator 400 Royal Street, Suite 1190 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-8101 Attn: Caitlin Morgenstern Email: [email protected] Any proposals received after this deadline will not be considered. All envelopes containing a paper proposal must bear the name of the entity making the proposal, and must have the following clearly written or typed on the face of the envelope: 2018 Proposals for Training Consultant for the Louisiana Protective Order Registry. All questions relative to this request for proposals (“RFP”) should be directed to Caitlin Morgenstern who may be reached via telephone at (504) 310-2550 or via e-mail at [email protected]. All questions should be submitted by 4:00 p.m. (CST), on Thursday, October 25, 2018. The preferred method of receiving questions is via e-mail.
    [Show full text]
  • State Supreme Court Sits at University of Louisiana at Monroe
    A Newsletter of the Judiciary of the State of Louisiana Volume 6, No. 1 Spring 2003 State Supreme Court Sits at University of Louisiana at Monroe The Louisiana Supreme Court heard oral ar- guments on four pending cases on April 7 at the University of Louisiana at Monroe (ULM). Six jus- tices held proceedings at ULM as part of an ongo- ing effort by the Court to educate and to inform students and the general public about the work of the Court. “For over 15 years, holding court in venues other than the Supreme Court courthouse has been a tra- dition of the Court. The goal is to provide citizens with a snapshot of the volume, variety and com- plexity of the Court's caseload by bringing the Loui- siana Supreme Court to them,” said Chief Justice Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Prior to oral arguments, Justice Chet D. Traylor, a 1969 graduate of Northeast Louisiana State Uni- versity, now known as ULM, welcomed the high school and university students in attendance in ULM's Brown Auditorium. Justice Traylor was Louisiana Supreme Court Justice Chet D. Traylor, elected in 1996 to the Fourth Supreme Court Dis- a ULM alumnus and a native of nearby Colum- trict which includes Monroe. bia, La., announces the Court’s sitting at ULM. According to Justice Traylor, “The Supreme Photo courtesy of ULM Court's decision to hold court at ULM is an historic and momentous event for the people of northeast Louisiana. The last time the Supreme Court sat in Monroe was June 1894. The people of Louisiana need to know that this is their Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Weimer Elected to Supreme Court
    A Newsletter of the Judiciary of the State of Louisiana Volume 4, No. 4 Fall/Winter 2001 Weimer Elected to Supreme Court On December 17, 2001, Judge John L. Weimer was sworn-in as Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court, Sixth District, at an induction ceremony at Nicholls State University, Talbot Auditorium, in Thibodaux, Louisiana. The oath of office was administered by Daniel A. Cavell, his brother-in-law and an attorney from Thibodaux. Louisiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. and Retired Sixth District Justice Harry T. Lemmon, Justice Weimer’s predecessor, provided remarks welcoming Weimer to the Supreme Court bench. Justice Weimer, 47, was born in Thibodaux and graduated from Thibodaux High School. He received a B.S. degree in 1976 from Nicholls State Univer- sity, graduating with academic honors, and his Juris Doctor degree from Louisiana State University in Justice John L. Weimer 1980. Prior to his election to the Supreme Court, th Justice Weimer served as Judge of the 17 Judicial th st sity 50 Anniversary Golden Graduate Award; Who’s District Court 1995-1998, and Judge of the 1 Cir- Who Among American Teachers, and the Nicholls cuit Court of Appeal, District 1, Division B from State University Presidential Award for Teaching Ex- 1998 to the present. cellence. In 2000 Justice Weimer was recognized For fifteen years, 1980-1995, Justice Weimer was for the significant assistance he provided in estab- an attorney in the private practice of law. He was lishing the Lafourche Parish Drug Treatment Court. also both an Adjunct Professor of Law and a Profes- Justice Weimer is completing the unexpired sor of Law at Nicholls State University during the term due to the early retirement of Justice Lemmon.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of LOUISIANA 2017 ANNUAL REPORT of the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court the SUPREME COURT of LOUISIANA from Left: Justice Scott J
    SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA 2017 ANNUAL REPORT of the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA From left: Justice Scott J. Crichton, Justice Marcus R. Clark, Justice John L. Weimer, Chief Justice Bernette Joshua Johnson, Justice Greg G. Guidry, Justice Jefferson D. Hughes III, Justice James T. Genovese. CHIEF JUSTICE BERNETTE JUSTICE GREG G. GUIDRY JUSTICE MARCUS R. CLARK JOSHUA JOHNSON First Supreme Court District Fourth Supreme Court District Seventh Supreme Court District Jefferson, Orleans, St. Helena, St. Tam- Bienville, Caldwell, Catahoula, Jefferson and Orleans Parishes.* many, Tangipahoa, and Washington Claiborne, Concordia, East Carroll, Parishes.* Franklin, Grant, Jackson, LaSalle, Lin- coln, Madison, Morehouse, Ouachita, JUSTICE SCOTT J. Rapides, Richland, Tensas, Union, CRICHTON West Carroll, and Winn Parishes.* Second Supreme Court District Allen, Beauregard, Bossier, Caddo, JUSTICE JEFFERSON D. DeSoto, Evangeline, Natchitoches, Red HUGHES III River, Sabine, Vernon, and Webster Fifth Supreme Court District Parishes.* Ascension, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Iberville, Livingston, Pointe JUSTICE JAMES T. Coupee, West Baton Rouge, and West GENOVESE Feliciana Parishes.* Third Supreme Court District Acadia, Avoyelles, Calcasieu, Cam- JUSTICE JOHN L. WEIMER eron, Jefferson Davis, Lafayette, St. Sixth Supreme Court District Landry, and Vermilion.* Assumption, Iberia, Jefferson, La- Took office January 1, 2017. fourche, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. Martin, St. Mary, and * See Court District Maps on pages 12-13. Terrebonne Parishes.* ABOUT THIS REPORT RESOURCES ON THE WEB AT WWW.LASC.ORG The Supreme Court Annual Report is a useful guide to judicial personnel The STATISTICAL DATA section summarizes two-year activity trends and contacts throughout the state, as well as an overview of the Court’s in juvenile, civil, criminal and traffic categories for courts at all levels in progress in 2017 and includes maps of electoral districts for the Supreme the state.
    [Show full text]