DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Botany Post Construction Monitoring Annual Report 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Botany Post Construction Monitoring Annual Report 2013 Port Botany Post Construction Environmental Monitoring Port Botany Post Construction Monitoring Annual Report 2013 EL1112046 Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation September 2013 Document Information Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation Project Name Port Botany Post Construction Monitoring Annual Report 2013 File Reference Umbrella Document September 2013.docx Job Reference EL112046 Date September 2013 Contact Information Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Trading as Cardno Ecology Lab Level 9, The Forum 203 Pacific Highway St. Leonards NSW 2065 Telephone: 02 9496 7700 Facsimile: 02 9499 3902 International: +612 9496 7700 [email protected] www.cardno.com.au Document Control Version Date Author Author Reviewer Reviewer Initials Initials A 30 June 2013 Peggy O’Donnell POD Dr Craig Blount CB 1 17 September 2013 Peggy O’Donnell POD Dr Craig Blount CB © Cardno 2013. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document. Executive Summary This Port Botany Post Construction Monitoring Annual Report 2013 summarises the findings of the first year post-construction monitoring for five components of Penrhyn Estuary Habitat Enhancement Plan (PEHEP) implemented by Sydney Ports in association with the expansion of berthing facilities at Port Botany. The primary objectives of the environmental enhancement works within Penrhyn Estuary are to: > Expand the existing shorebird habitat, to continue to attract migratory shorebirds and potentially attract more shorebirds; > Create seagrass habitat; > Expand the area of saltmarsh habitat; and > Provide controlled public access and minimise disturbance within the Estuary. The Post Construction Environmental Monitoring program began in 2012 and extends until 2017 with the overall aim to verify the success of habitat enhancement and to identify corrective actions required to ensure long-term success of habitat enhancement. Monitoring has been done in accordance with an approved Monitoring Services Management Plan (MSMP) that describes the management and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures that have been followed during implementation of the monitoring program. Environmental Monitoring for the first year post-enhancement works has been completed for the following components: 1. Shorebirds, including monitoring the numbers and species composition of shorebirds, assessing feeding behaviour of shorebirds and monitoring the existing and future effects of disturbance in Penrhyn Estuary on shorebird behaviour; 2. Benthos, including monitoring changes in benthic invertebrate communities in existing and new intertidal/shallow subtidal habitats in terms of their impacts on food items for shorebirds, assessing changes in benthic communities in different feeding sub-habitats and assessing the sustainability of created habitats with respect to their provision of food items for shorebirds; 3. Saltmarsh; including monitoring changes in existing saltmarsh habitats that were retained in terms of the impacts of port construction and operation and assessing the success of created saltmarsh habitat, including its ecological function; 4. Seagrass, including mapping the distribution and measuring ecological characteristics of seagrasses in existing (Foreshore Beach to the mouth of the Mill Stream) and newly created habitat (the flushing Channel and intertidal areas of Penrhyn Estuary) and comparing these with information collected for seagrasses prior to and/or during construction works, and measuring the success of transplanting Posidonia from the dredged area to Quibray Bay. 5. Water Quality, including verifying that post-construction flushing of the estuary is sufficient to prevent eutrophic conditions from forming as a result of processes occurring within Penrhyn Estuary or its catchment, involving monitoring of key indicators such as turbidity, nutrient concentrations and flushing times. The following table summarises key findings in each of the five monitoring programs. Monitoring Indicator Result Comment Program Shorebirds Peak Counts of Bar-tailed Target not met, but average Positive trend Godwits count increasing post- construction. Numbers consistent throughout the season Higher abundance nocturnally. Peak Counts of Red Knot Absent from the estuary No reference site available to compare populations. Peak Counts of Pacific Target exceeded for three Positive result. Variable Golden Plover consecutive seasons. numbers at low tide but gradual increase apparent post- construction. Peak Counts of Curlew Target not met. Remained Declining across SE Australia so Sandpiper absent throughout likely to be caused by events at construction and post- a greater scale construction phases. Peak Counts of Red- Target exceeded Positive result. Numbers necked Stint consistent throughout season, higher average since construction phase. Peak Counts of Double- Target not met Extremely variable within and banded Plover among seasons at both Penrhyn and the reference site. No distinct pattern of population change Benthos Abundance of Target not met Positive trend, increasing in third invertebrates (#/sample) post-construction survey Biomass (wet weight Target exceeded Positive result, increase g/sample) significantly greater than at Reference locations Mean Grain Size (mm) Target exceeded: Decrease Positive result: soil amendments compared to pre- successful in increasing fine enhancement particles Fine sediment fraction Target exceeded: Increase Positive result: soil amendments (%) compared to pre- successful in increasing fine enhancement particles and organic material Link to shorebird No clear correlation Insufficient data for trend abundance analysis Saltmarsh Area of cover Target met: Four fold increase Positive result: habitat creation in saltmarsh area and planting successful Growth (assemblage Target met: Better than Positive result: indicates healthy along transects) baseline in all areas except habitat altered areas Species diversity in Target met: Equivalent to or Positive result quadrats increased compared to baseline in all areas except those that received transplants Sarcocornia quinqueflora Equivalent to or increased Positive result, but lower cover (% cover) compared to baseline in all than at references in all but new areas except those that were habitat altered or received transplants Sporobolus virginicus (% Equivalent to or increased Positive result but lower than cover) compared to baseline except references undisturbed areas or those Monitoring Indicator Result Comment Program that received transplants Suaeda australis (% Increase in undisturbed areas, Positive result but new areas cover) but not in areas that were lower than references altered or received transplants Juncus kraussii (% cover) Increase in areas that Positive result compared to received transplants reference areas Plant health conditions Target met: Better than Positive result baseline and references Max height Target met: Better than Positive result baseline and references Ecological function Target met: Equivalent to Positive result (epifaunal assemblage) assemblages in references Mangrove Invasion Trees Target met: Decreased Positive result compared to baseline and similar to references Mangrove Invasion Target met: Decreased Positive result Seedlings compared to baseline and similar to references Mangrove Invasion Target met: Decreased Positive result Pneumatophores compared to baseline and similar to references Seagrass Distribution along Decreased significantly prior Negative but not associated with Foreshore Beach to habitat enhancement Port Expansion project Distribution in Early signs of recovery for Positive trend Rehabilitation Area Halophila and Zostera, but not (Channel) Posidonia Condition along Halophila with short sparse Positive trend Foreshore Beach leaves with medium load of epiphytes Distribution in intertidal Target met: Observation of Positive result, similar to pre- areas within Penrhyn sparse, ephemeral patches of enhancement Estuary Zostera Condition of Posidonia Target met: Successful, Positive result transplanted to Quibray generally not distinguishable Bay from surrounding seagrass Water Quality pH Target met: No difference Positive result post-construction, no exceedances of guidelines Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Target met: No difference Positive result post-construction, very few exceedances of guidelines Electrical Conductivity Lower post-construction, no Could be attributable to data (EC) guideline value quality in pre-construction phase Total Nitrogen (TN) Target met: No change post- Positive result construction, few exceedances of guidelines Total Phosphorous Target met: No change post- Positive result construction, but some exceedances of guidelines Total Suspended Solids Target met: Higher during Positive result, exceedances (TSS) high tide, but no difference typical of estuarine environment post-construction, frequent Monitoring Indicator Result Comment Program exceedances of guidelines Chlorophyll a (Chl-a) Target met: No change post- Positive result construction, few exceedances of guidelines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Club Brochure 2018 – 2019
    OFFICIAL CLUB BROCHURE 2018 – 2019 ROYAL MOTOR YACHT CLUB OF NSW PORT HACKING BRANCH Contents Welcome............................................... 1 A Brief History...................................... 3 Clubhouse - An Experience to Savour................ 6 - Dining at RMYC - Port Hacking..... 9 - Social Activities............................... 13 Waterfront Facilities............................ 17 Becoming a Member........................... 24 Member Benefits................................. 29 Sailing Division..................................... 33 Cruising................................................. 44 RMYC Golf Club................................... 45 Fishing Club......................................... 49 Port Hacking Game Fishing Club...... 52 How to Find Us.................................... 55 PREMIER PUBLISHING Royal Motor Yacht Club Port Hacking and Premier wish to thank 14 Ellis St the advertisers who appear in this publication for their support and South Yarra VIC 3141 wish them every business success. The contents of this brochure are believed to be correct at the time of printing, nevertheless, T 03 9521 7994 Royal Motor Yacht Club Port Hacking we cannot endorse and readers should not rely solely upon the E [email protected] accuracy of any statements or claims contained herein without W www.premierpublishing.com.au prior consultation with the service provider. Welcome to ROYAL MOTOR YACHT CLUB PORT HACKING We look forward to welcoming you to our club. ocated on Port Hacking, the Royal Motor of on-water interests. There are groups who Enjoy a family meal in Yachties Bistro, open into the Club to ensure we continue to grow and Yacht Club - Port Hacking is a recreational, enjoy Sailing, Cruising and Fishing. Our members seven days a week. Or come along to one of the evolve. With our stunning waterfront location, entertainment,L sailing and cruising club that is have also formed a long-running Social Golf Club many family-oriented social occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 – Maps Part 5
    LEGEND LGAs Study area FAIRFIELD LGA ¹ 8.12a 8.12b 8.12c 8.12d BANKSTOWN LGA 8.12e 8.12f 8.12i ROCKDALE LGA HURSTVILLE LGA 8.12v 8.12g 8.12h 8.12j 8.12k LIVERPOOL LGA NORTH BOTANY BAY CITY OF KOGARAH 8.12n 8.12o 8.12l 8.12m 8.12r 8.12s 8.12p 8.12q SUTHERLAND SHIRE 8.12t 8.12u COORDINATE SCALE 0500 1,000 2,000 PAGE SIZE FIG NO. 8.12 FIGURE TITLE Overview of Site Specific Maps DATE 17/08/2010 SYSTEM 1:70,000 A3 © SMEC Australia Pty Ltd 2010. Meters MGA Z56 All Rights Reserved Data Source - Vegetation: The Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment LOCATION I:Projects\3001765 - Georges River Estuary Process Management Authority Area (Draft) (2009). NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change PROJECT NO. 3001765 PROJECT TITLE Georges River Estuary Process Study CREATED BY C. Thompson Study\009 DATA\GIS\ArcView Files\Working files and Water. Hurstville, NSW Australia. LEGEND Weed Hotspot Priority Areas Study Area LGAs Riparian Vegetation & EEC (Moderate Priority) Riparian Vegetation & EEC (High Priority) ¹ Seagrass (High Priority) Saltmarsh (High Priority) Estuarine Reedland (Moderate Priority) Mangrove (Moderate Priority) Swamp Oak (Moderate Priority) Mooring Areas River Area Reserves River Access Cherrybrook Park Area could be used for educational purposes due to high public usage of the wharf and boat launch facilities. Educate on responsible use of watercraft, value of estuarine and foreshore vegetation and causes and outcomes of foreshore FAIRFIELD LGA erosion. River Flat Eucalypt Forest Cabramatta Creek (Liverpool LGA) - WEED HOT SPOT Dominated by Balloon Vine (Cardiospermum grandiflorum) and River Flat Eucalypt Forest Wild Tobacco Bush (Solanum mauritianum).
    [Show full text]
  • Macrobrachium Intermedium in Southeastern Australia: Spatial Heterogeneity and the Effects of Species of Seagrass
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 75: 239-249, 1991 Published September 11 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Demographic patterns of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium in southeastern Australia: spatial heterogeneity and the effects of species of seagrass Charles A. Gray* School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW. Australia ABSTRACT. The effects of species of seagrass (Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis) on spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the demography of estuarine populations of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium across 65 km of the Sydney region, southeastern Australia, were examined. Three estuaries were sampled in 1983 and 1984 to assess the magnitude of intra- and inter- estuary variability in demographic characteristics among populations. Species of seagrass had no effect on the demographic patterns of populations: differences in the magnitude and directions of change in abundances, recruitment, reproductive characteristics, size structures and growth were as great among populations within each species of seagrass as those between the 2 seagrasses Abiotic factors, such as the location of a meadow in relation to depth of water and distance offshore, and the interactions of these factors with recruiting larvae are hypothesised to have greater influence than the species of seagrass in determining the distribution and abundance of these prawns. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in demography was similar across all spatial scales sampled: among meadows (50 m to 3 km apart) in an estuary and among meadows in all 3 estuaries (10 to 65 km apart). Variability in demographic processes among populations in the Sydney region was most likely due to stochastic factors extrinsic to the seagrasses then~selves.I conclude that the demography of seagrass-dwelling estuarine populations of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Impact Report: Residential Development Market March 2015
    Sydney Impact Report Residential Development Market 2015 March Quarter Update The only way is up INSIDE THIS ISSUE: The previous March 2015 quarter has revealed that Sydney and its suburbs are slowly Residential LGA Zones 2 transforming into mid-high rise cities. During the quarter the Sydney metropolitan residential property value has jumped up to 30% in comparison to last year’s results. The low interest rate environment was one of the factors in pushing property value up. Residential Market 3 The low interest rates and a long running hot residential property market has seen many off-the-plan apartment sales sell out in record time. The high volume of sales Residential Development Supply 5 result may be a further incentive for developers to actively purchase and submit development approvals, and take advantage of the low interest rate. The Inner Sydney region, within 10 km proximity to the Sydney CBD, is set to become busier Market Observations 7 with many major developments flagged for construction during 2015. Residential development sites are popular to both local and foreign developers. The Economic Fundamentals 8 Inner Sydney sites were hotly contested for by both local and foreign developers whilst Middle and Outer Sydney sites (20km—30km to the Sydney CBD) were mostly acquired by local developers. Many of the recorded development sites in Inner and Middle Sydney were previously industrial sites. About Preston Rowe Paterson 10 Contact Us 12 Phone: +61 2 9292 7400 1 Fax: +61 2 9292 7404 Address: Level 14, 347 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Email: [email protected] Follow us: Visit www.prpsydney.com.au © Copyright Preston Rowe Paterson NSW Pty Limited Residential LGA Zones According to the Real Estate Institute of Australia, the local government areas (LGAs) in the Sydney’s Statistical Division will be divided up into three geographical rings being inner, middle and outer.
    [Show full text]
  • Jellyfish Catostylus Mosaicus (Rhizostomeae) in New South Wales, Australia
    - MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 196: 143-155,2000 Published April 18 Mar Ecol Prog Ser l Geographic separation of stocks of the edible jellyfish Catostylus mosaicus (Rhizostomeae) in New South Wales, Australia K. A. Pitt*, M. J. Kingsford School of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, A08 University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia ABSTRACT: The population structure of the commercially harvested jellyfish Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae) was investigated in estuaries and bays in New South Wales, Australia. Variations in abundance and recruitment were studied in 6 estuaries separated by distances ranglng from 75 to 800 km. Patterns of abundance differed greatly among estuaries and the rank abundance among estuaries changed on 5 out of the 6 times sampling occurred. Great variation in the timing of recruitment was also observed among estuaries. Variations in abundance and recruitment were as extreme among nearby estuaries as distant ones. Broad scale sampling and detailed time series of abundance over a period of 2.7 yr at 2 locations showed no consistent seasonal trend in abundance at 1 location, but there was some indication of seasonality at the second location. At Botany Bay, the abun- dance of medusae increased with distance into the estuary and on 19 out of the 30 times sampling occurred medusae were found at sites adjacent to where rivers enter the bay. Medusae were found to be strong swimmers and this may aid medusae in maintaining themselves in the upper-reaches of estu- aries, where advection from an estuary is least likely. Variability in patterns of abundance and recruit- ment suggested regulation by processes occurring at the scale of individual estuaries and, combined with their relatively strong swimming ability, supported a model of population retention within estuar- ies.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Sydney Moorings Analysis
    NSW Sydney Moorings Analysis Sydney Harbour (Area A) Date Last Mooring Total No. of No. of Private Applicant Mooring Bay Code/Bay Name Allocated & Ratio Applicants Moorings Totals Totals Comments AA - DARLING POINT 4 5/06/2015 25 AC - DOUBLE BAY 31 21/05/2015 203 AD - ELIZABETH BAY 32 9/04/2015 20 AE - FELIX BAY 11 30/03/2015 39 AF - HERMIT BAY 8 31/05/2015 30 AJ - PARSLEY BAY 13 28/05/2015 44 AO - ROSE BAY 40 2/06/2015 138 AP - RUSHCUTTERS BAY 58 27/04/2015 75 AT - VAUCLUSE BAY 25 28/05/2015 72 34% AU - WATSONS BAY 45 5/03/2015 131 267 777 Sydney Harbour (Area B) BB - BEAUTY POINT 0 8/05/2014 17 BE - CASTLECRAG 5 12/05/2015 45 BN - KILLARNEY 14 2/06/2015 68 BP - LONG BAY 5 29/04/2015 86 BR - NORTHBRIDGE 0 23/03/2015 52 BS - PEARL BAY 1 19/05/2015 145 BT - PICKERING POINT 0 7/05/2015 56 BU - POWDER HULK BAY 6 25/05/2015 105 BV - QUAKERS HAT BAY 0 12/06/2015 93 BX - SAILORS BAY 12 8/04/2015 62 BY - SALT PAN CREEK 3 7/05/2015 25 CA - SEAFORTH 0 28/05/2015 56 CD - SUGARLOAF BAY 1 29/04/2015 26 CE - SUGARLOAF POINT 8 7/02/2015 28 7% CH - WILLOUGHBY BAY 5 10/09/2014 32 60 896 Sydney Harbour (Area C) AG - LITTLE MANLY COVE 24 6/05/2015 35 AH - MANLY COVE 52 30/01/2015 86 AI - NORTH HARBOUR 106 1/04/2015 111 BA - BALMORAL 36 2/12/2014 56 BL - FISHER BAY 15 16/02/2015 18 BZ - SANDY BAY 22 17/02/2014 24 GE - CAREENING COVE 27 9/02/2009 18 GL - KIRRIBILLI 8 19/08/1992 2 GN - LITTLE SIRIUS COVE 10 9/04/2015 80 GP - MOSMAN BAY 48 29/01/2015 90 GQ - NEUTRAL BAY 50 6/01/2015 47 GU - SHELL COVE 30 2/06/2015 74 65% GW - TAYLORS BAY 0 28/05/2015 21 428
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Storms in Nsw and Their Effect on the Coast
    I I. COASTAL STORMS IN N.s.w. .: AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 .1 and Their Effect on the Coast I 'I I 1'1 ! I I I I I I I I I I , . < May 198,8 , 'I " I I : COASTAL STORMS· IN N.s.w. I AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 I and Their Effect on the Coast I I I I I 1: 1 I I I I I M.N. CLARKE M.G. GEARY I Chief Engineer Principal Engineer I Prepared by : University of N.S.W. Water Research Laboratory I bID IPTIID311IIcr: ~Th'¥@~ , I May 1988 ------..! Coaat a Rivera Branch I I I I CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ( ii ) I LIST OF TABLES (iv) 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SUMMARY 2 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5 I 3.1 METEOROLOGICAL DATA 5 3.2 TIDE LEVELS 7 3.3 WAVE HEIGHTS AND PERIODS 10 I 3.4 STORM mSTORY - AUGUST 1985 TO AUGUST 1986 13 4. WAVE RUN-UP 15 I 4.1 MANLY WARRINGAH BEACHES 15 4.2 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 15 I 4.3 THEORETICAL ASSESSMENT 16 4.4 COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND THEORETICAL RUN-UP LEVELS 23 5. BEACH SURVEYS 25 ·1 5.1 GOSFORD BEACHES 25 5.2 MANLY W ARRINGAH BEACHES 28 I 5.3 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 29 6. OFFSHORE SURVEYS . 30 6.1 SURVEY METHODS 30 I 6.2 GOSFORD BEACHES 30 6.3 WARRINGAH BEACHES 31 I 6.4 ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY OF OFFSHORE SURVEYS 32 7. OFFSHORE SEDIMENT SAMPLES - GOSFORD BEACHES 34 7.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION 34 I 7.2 SAMPLE CLASSIFICATION 34 , 7.3 SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS 34 I 7.4 COMPARISON OF 1983/84 AND POST STORM OFFSHORE DATA 36 8.
    [Show full text]
  • An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales [Volume 1]
    An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales [Volume 1] With Remarks on the Dispositions, Customs, Manners &c. of the Native Inhabitants of that Country. To Which are Added, Some Particulars of New Zealand: Complied by Permission, From the Mss. of Lieutenant-Governor King Collins, David (1756-1810) A digital text sponsored by University of Sydney Library Sydney 2003 colacc1 http://purl.library.usyd.edu.au/setis/id/colacc1 © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Prepared from the print edition published by T. Cadell Jun. and W. Davies 1798 All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1798 F263 Australian Etext Collections at Early Settlement prose nonfiction pre-1810 An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales [Volume 1] With Remarks on the Dispositions, Customs, Manners &c. of the Native Inhabitants of that Country. To Which are Added, Some Particulars of New Zealand: Complied by Permission, From the Mss. of Lieutenant-Governor King Contents. Introduction. SECT. PAGE I. TRANSPORTS hired to carry Convicts to Botany Bay. — The Sirius and the Supply i commissioned. — Preparations for sailing. — Tonnage of the Transports. — Numbers embarked. — Fleet sails. — Regulations on board the Transports. — Persons left behind. — Two Convicts punished on board the Sirius. — The Hyæna leaves the Fleet. — Arrival of the Fleet at Teneriffe. — Proceedings at that Island. — Some Particulars respecting the Town of Santa Cruz. — An Excursion made to Laguna. — A Convict escapes from one of the Transports, but is retaken. — Proceedings. — The Fleet leaves Teneriffe, and puts to Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012-2017: Metro North East
    Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: Metro North East Region A new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is part of the Office of Environment and Heritage. Throughout this strategy, references to NPWS should be taken to mean NPWS carrying out functions on behalf of the Director General of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, and the Minister for the Environment. For further information contact: Metro North East Region Metropolitan and Mountains Branch National Parks and Wildlife Service Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box 3031 Asquith NSW 2077 Phone: (02) 9457 8900 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74293 625 3 OEH 2012/0374 August 2013 This plan may be cited as: OEH 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17, Metro North East Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours, Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • COOK, CUNNINGHAM, HUGHES, MACARTHUR, THROSBY And
    BELLS LIN E OF RD RD Riv g C K Y IL k RD ay 1 L Howes Cape Three Points Creek L R Bellbird Hill Hawkesbury D RD R Pie Dish Hill Y Y Cogra Hill DEMONDR Campbells O RR R FE Ettalong RD Mourawaring Point RLY E Bar P L MANS oint M WISE D G D O R R R C E Umina SCENIC E N L A R L T F I THE Belubula Chifley Dam E O V - T K R C D RD S A E E Coxs IN S Bombi Point Y W L E Carcoar N Y RD A A Lake Y G L ON B BELLS W T H PA N I Hawkesbury River A Grose D M R Fish I Grose TA S T A NORTHERN E C River E V K River U C A R R River C R AJ O O F Broken Bay NG R River E River RD B L I D HORNSBY WESTERN W D L W R O IND Y SOR FW RIC BLACKTOW HMON N D W River RD O IC River T IF C JENOLAN A P ITT E N RD T P L S RD T BAY S D A 2 C R D IE Campbells R R W Pittwater A E U N Q Lake C D A R M Rowlands River D R Y E PITTWATER W N BLACKTOWN -IN BAULKHAM HILLS D River D Y S 9 O G S R ALS ESBURY TO Y HAWK N E RD JO H N H D E G R LITHGOW W R A R Y E 2 R R BA E I D L C R W R R T H COOK, CUNNINGHAM, HUGHES, D E I S M C MACQUARIERiver S T H 1 E A O R N M N C D MACKELLAR Lake Oberon O RD N VA S L T D E E A N D 3 V E A M R ON R E A A E G H C MITCHELL H H MACKELLAR W T 10 Y Nepean R R Duckmaloi O L N MACARTHUR, THROSBY and WERRIWA Y MITCHELL R L STERN Y W WE IN MAIN D RD N I D F S 3 F B R O O O R B R R O E Little River E B S W S T E T STLIN GREENWAYK PKW RD M7 CA VALE Y ST Fish LE 7 THE Y A H W N I H O Campbells LL M W CALARE Kedumba RD P W Little BLACKTOWN A NORTH River R WARRINGAH Y BRADFIELDKU-RING-GAI Y C BLUE D I F CHIFLEY I Lane C MAIN BRADFIELD JENOLAN LINDSAY CALARE CHIFLEYRLY
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury Shelf Environmental Background Report
    HAWKESBURY SHELF MARINE BIOREGION ASSESSMENT Hawkesbury Shelf environmental background report Background The NSW Marine Estate Management Authority (the Authority) was established by the NSW Government in 2013 to advise on policies, priorities and directions for the NSW marine estate. The NSW marine estate includes marine waters, estuaries and the coast. It extends seaward out to three nautical miles and from the Queensland border in the north to the Victorian border in the south. The full definition and map can be found at www.marine.nsw.gov.au. Contributors The Authority acknowledges the key contributions of officers from the following in preparing this report: • NSW Department of Primary Industries • Office of Environment and Heritage • Transport for NSW • Department of Planning and Environment • Marine Estate Expert Knowledge Panel Published by the NSW Marine Estate Management Authority Hawkesbury Shelf marine bioregion assessment – Hawkesbury Environmental background report First published February 2016 ISBN 978-1-74256-893-5 More information This paper and more information about the Hawkesbury Shelf marine bioregion assessment are available at www.marine.nsw.gov.au. RM8 reference INT15/135530 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development, 2016.This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (February 2016).
    [Show full text]