DOCSLIB.ORG

The Netanyahu Investigations: What Next After the Attorney General’S Announcement?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Netanyahu Investigations: What Next After the Attorney General’S Announcement? BICOM Briefing The Netanyahu investigations: What next after the Attorney General’s announcement? February 2019 Introduction Netanyahu has also said that he will not resign during any indictment process. Israel’s Attorney General (AG) Avichai Mandel- Several stages exist following Mandelblit’s ini- blit will soon announce his decision whether or tial announcement on whether he recommends not to indict Prime Minister Benjamin Netanya- indicting Netanyahu (Stage 1). hu – pending a hearing – in three separate cor- ruption cases. Netanyahu has said that he will It is not known how the AG’s initial decision, dur- not resign and he is not legally required to do so. ing an election campaign, will affect Netanyahu’s But with elections on 9 April, the AG’s decision Likud Party’s standing in the polls. The party is has huge political significance. This briefing currently predicted to win approximately 30 seats examines the corruption cases, maps out the and all the polls suggest Netanyahu is best placed different stages of the legal and political pro- to form a coalition after the elections. Moreover, cesses, and analyses potential future scenarios. Netanyahu could even utilise the announcement It represents an update of a BICOM briefing The to brand himself a victim of media and judicial Netanyahu investigations: details, process and elites which may even improve his popularity. At possibilities published in February 2018 when the same time, the announcement will almost cer- the Israeli police published their recommenda- tainly cause serious embarrassment to Netanyahu tion that the Prime Minister be indicted. – especially once detailed evidence and testimony is inevitably leaked to the media. Stage 1. Stage 2. Stage 3. Stage 4. Stage 5. AG decision Pre-trial AG final District Court Supreme to indict hearing decision trial & ruling Court Appeal 3-9 months 3 weeks - 4 months 3-7 months 6-12 months Background The party-political context to the AG’s decision In February 2018, after a 16-month investigation, the Israeli Police recommended that Prime Minis- The AG’s announcement will cause all the major ter Netanyahu be charged with bribery, fraud and political parties, including Netanyahu’s potential breach of trust in two corruption cases known coalition partners, to clarify their position on as “Case 1000” and “Case 2000”. In December whether they would serve in a future Netanyahu 2018, the police further recommended indicting government. Although some party leaders have Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in been explicit that they would not serve with him “Case 4000.” Since those recommendations, the if he is indicted, others have been deliberate- Attorney General has been reviewing the evidence ly ambiguous as to whether this relates to an to decide on his own recommendations. Netan- announcement by the AG of indictment proceed- yahu is considered innocent until proven guilty ings pending a hearing (Stage 1), after a final and he has maintained his innocence throughout, decision to indict (Stage 3), or after a verdict from consistently stating that “there will be nothing the Court (end of Stage 4 & Stage 5). This ambi- because there was nothing” while arguing that guity is particularly significant because the April the left wing and media has been putting undue elections and subsequent coalition building will pressure on the AG to charge him. “They’re trying take place between stages 1 and 3. to force the Attorney General to brazenly inter- vene in the elections by ordering me to a hearing, The Labour Party led by Avi Gabbay have said despite knowing that it won’t be possible to con- they will not join a Netanyahu led coalition clude the hearing process by election day”. under any circumstances. But Netanyahu’s current coalition partners have been more cir- 1 cumspect. In December 2018, Justice Minister State Prosecution then arranges a time for a Ayelet Shaked, one of the leaders of the New hearing with the PM’s defence team. The pros- Right party, which is considered a natural coali- ecution will likely push for an earlier date, with tion ally for Netanyahu, said: “My opinion re- the defence arguing a longer period is needed to mains that, certainly until a final decision by the allow the latter to properly prepare. Attorney General after a hearing, we don’t have to do anything … by law, the Prime Minister can The legal ramifications: There is no legal im- remain until he is convicted with a final verdict. pediment to Netanyahu running in the elections Rationality dictates that the decision of one per- as Likud leader and attempting to form the next son, the Attorney General, cannot bring down a government. government.” The political ramifications: Then-Prime Min- In October 2018, Moshe Kahlon, leader of the ister Ehud Olmert was forced to resign by his centrist Kulanu Party and part of the current coa- coalition partners months before this stage (even lition, said that Netanyahu could not continue to before police recommendations were completed). lead the country if he were to be indicted in the Political pressure – primarily from opposition corruption investigations. Kahlon’s support for parties – will be exerted on Netanyahu to re- Netanyahu is key because the polls consistently sign, especially if some of the charges include predict that it would be impossible for Netanya- bribery, but Netanyahu’s coalition allies will be hu to build a 61-member coalition without Ku- supportive and Likud’s support base will likely lanu’s support. However, Kahlon recently back- rally around their leader. The AG’s decision will tracked and said he would be willing to serve in force all the major parties to clarify their position a Netanyahu government, even if he were to be on whether they would serve in a coalition with indicted by the Attorney General. Netanyahu after the elections. The newly merged Blue and White party is also The political ramifications part 2: Israeli yet to fully clarify its position. In January, Yesh Elections: Elections will be held on 9 April, in a Atid leader Yair Lapid told Hadashot News that period between the AG’s initial announcement he would not join a Netanyahu-led government and a hearing taking place. According to Israeli if the AG announces an intention to indict the law, the President is tasked with asking the MK Prime Minister, even before the hearing process most likely to be able to form a coalition of 61 has been completed, and it is believed this posi- seats or more to form a government. Usually this tion will ultimately be adopted by the Blue and is the leader of the largest political party, but in White Party. On 26 February, Lapid took to twit- theory it can be any MK from any party. The law ter to say the Blue and White Party would only also allows for 61 Knesset members to sign a let- form a National Unity Government with Labour ter to the President asking him to confer the job and Likud, if Netanyahu had left the party. of forming a government on a specific Knesset member. Each MK has four to six weeks from the The Netanyahu investigations: What time requested by the President to try and form a government. In light of this, one of two scenarios happens next? could occur: Netanyahu’s future will be determined by two Scenario 1: Netanyahu is asked to form the next separate but parallel tracks: the legal process government and succeeds in convincing enough focused on the AG decision over an indictment party leaders to join his coalition, despite the and subsequent trials; and the political process AG’s announcement, and continues to serve as which relates both to the election results and Prime Minister. The rest of this briefing is based how politicians will respond to the various legal on this scenario, which is considered the most stages and subsequent developments. likely one. Stage 1: The AG announces his Scenario 2: Netanyahu either fails – or is not decision to indict the Prime Minister, asked – to form the next government due to a pending a hearing lack of support from other party leaders. In this scenario, the President would likely evaluate What happens: The Attorney General will whether the leader with the next best chances announce a decision whether to indict Prime – at this stage Benny Gantz – would succeed in Minister Netanyahu pending a hearing. The forming a governing coalition. In the event that 2 neither Netanyahu nor Gantz can form a 61-seat legally obliged to resign. NGOs may petition the majority government, the President could the- Supreme Court arguing that Netanyahu should oretically ask a different Likud MK to try and be forced to resign. There is legal uncertainty form a government. However, for this to happen, over whether the so called ‘Deri-Pinhasi Prece- the Likud party via its Central Committee would dent’ – a ruling which forces a Minister against have to force Netanyahu to resign as leader after whom the AG has filed an indictment to be re- which there would be a leadership contest within moved from office if he does not resign – applies the Likud (a ballot of all their members), which to the Prime Minister, and the Supreme Court is would take several weeks. unlikely to intervene at this stage. Stage 2: The hearing Within 30 days of the AG handing down a fi- nal indictment verdict, Netanyahu has the legal What happens? The State Prosecution meet option to ask the Knesset to vote to grant him with Netanyahu’s defence team privately to re- immunity. Under the ‘Knesset Members Immu- view the case. The private hearing – which can nity, Rights and Duties Law’ of 1951, Netanyahu include several meetings – is based on Israel’s would need the support of the Knesset ‘House Criminal Procedure Law which states that ‘the Committee’ (on which the governing coalition suspect will be entitled to apply in writing to the has a majority) and the majority of Knesset mem- prosecution authority… and to make a reasoned bers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, November 4 Headlines: Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria EU Declares Israel Boycott Protected as Free Speech Pro-Israel Alliance Prepares for 2017 Anti-Israel Campaign Lieberman Appoints new IDF deputy, Air Force Commander IDF Prevented US Diplomats from Visiting Jordan V. Pal. Israeli Exit Poll: Trump 49%, Clinton 44% David Duke: Jews Dominate Media, International Banking Report: Israel's UN Ambassador Made Secret Visit to Dubai Commentary: Yedioth Ahronoth: “Rabin, The Leader Who Taught Me Everything” By Moshe (Bogie) Yaalon, former IDF chief of staff and Minister of Defense Al Monitor: “Can battle over public broadcasting bring down Netanyahu?” By Ben Caspit, Senior Columnist at Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts November 4, 2016 Ynet News Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria Iran now commands a force of around 25,000 Shi'ite Muslim militants in Syria, mostly made up of recruits from Afghanistan and Pakistan, the former head of Israel's domestic intelligence agency has told a visiting Swiss delegation. Avi Dichter, chair of Israel's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, told members of the Swiss parliament the Iranian-backed force was focused on fighting Sunni rebels opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, not ISIS. "This is a foreign legion of some 25,000 militants, most of whom have come from Afghanistan and Pakistan," Dichter told the delegation, according to details provided by his office.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 01.- 15. April Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches Atomprogramm ....................................................................................... 1 2. Tragödie von Yarmouk ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Koalitionsverhandlungen und Perspektiven für eine Einheitsregierung ........................................................... 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches ously damage Iran's nuclear facilities. The alterna- Atomprogramm tive is living (or dying) with a nuclear weapons- Das Anfang April erreichte Rahmenabkommen der capable fanatical, tyrannical, aggressive regime fünf UN-Vetomächte und Deutschlands mit der irani- much more dangerous for the rest of the world than schen Regierung stieß in Jerusalem auf scharfe North Korea will ever be. Too bad the meetings Kritik. Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanyahu warnte weren't held in the holy city of Qom. In that case the in einem Telefonat mit US-Präsident Barack Obama comparison with the betrayal of Czechoslovakia by vor einer existentiellen Gefahr für Israel. Die Eck- the British and French in 1938 would have been punkte, die bis zum Sommer in einen Vertrag mün- even more perfect. That famous meeting, leading to den sollen,
    [Show full text]
  • Haaretz20170122 Annexing Settlements Like Thieves in the Night Haaretz Editorial
    Haaretz20170122 Annexing settlements like thieves in the night Haaretz Editorial In bid to push annexation, Israeli government tries to give Trump crash course in Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is doubtful whether U.S. President Donald Trump knows exactly where Ma’aleh Adumim is, or whether the term E-1 – the area that was annexed to the Ma’aleh Adumim municipality – brings back childhood memories. But this won’t last for long. It seems the Israeli government has decided to give Trump a crash course in understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and, mainly, to give him a loyalty test without any preparation. Only two days after Trump’s swearing-in, the Ministerial Committee for Legislation is scheduled to discuss Sunday the annexation of the West Bank settlement to the State of Israel, in order to quickly prepare a 1 draft of the bill to be presented to the Knesset for approval. The conventional wisdom is that from the moment Trump was elected president, Israel received a stamp of approval to carry out any scheme it could think of in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. >> Citing pressure from Trump, Netanyahu tries to torpedo legislation to annex West Bank settlement << Based on this logic, there is actually no need to put Trump to the test, and no need to rush as if this were a window of opportunity that might close at any second. But as everyone knows, gangs of thieves are never confident that the policeman they bribed will not turn against them at the last minute. Hence the urgency to grab Ma’aleh Adumim and annex it to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • How Palestinians Can Burst Israel's Political Bubble
    Al-Shabaka Policy Brief Policy Al-Shabaka March 2018 WHEN LEFT IS RIGHT: HOW PALESTINIANS CAN BURST ISRAEL’S POLITICAL BUBBLE By Amjad Iraqi Overview the allies holding up his fragile rule, from the ultra- orthodox Jewish parties to his personal rivals within Although no indictments have been issued yet, Israelis Likud. “King Bibi,” however, survived them all. A are speculating whether the latest developments in skilled politician, he has been adept at managing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption Israel’s notoriously volatile coalition system, and [email protected] scandals finally mark the beginning of his political has remained in power with three consecutive demise. The second-longest serving prime minister governments over nine years – each more right wing after David Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu has had a than the last.2 profound impact on Israel’s political scene since the 1990s. It is therefore troubling, especially to Netanyahu directly influenced the country’s media Palestinians, that if these corruption cases are the landscape by shaping the editorial stance of Israel harbinger of Netanyahu’s downfall, they will have Hayom (the nation’s gratis, most-read newspaper, had nothing to do with the more egregious crimes for funded by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson), which he is responsible, and for which he – and future and used the Communications Ministry to threaten Israeli leaders – have yet to be held accountable. and harass media outlets that were critical of him. Despite crises and condemnations throughout This policy brief analyzes Israel’s political his career – including mass Israeli protests for transformations under Netanyahu and maps out the socioeconomic justice in 2011 and, more recently, current leadership contenders from a Palestinian weekly protests against widespread government perspective.1 It argues that Israel’s insular political corruption – Netanyahu withstood public pressures discourse, and the increasing alignment of Israeli to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute proposes policy recommendations and reforms for government and public administration agencies. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information, and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The IDI Press produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy papers, the Caesarea Forum Series, periodicals, and conference proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 from Survival to Destiny Download Sheet
    Survey: 73% oppose a Palestinian state 85% of them Survey: support SOVEREIGNTY ריבונות Sovereignty A APolitical Political Journal Journal / / Issue Issue no. no. 11 7 // AugustMarch 20192016 73% Published by The SovereigntyPublished by Women Movement in Green founded and the by Forum Women for Sovereignty in Green oppose a Palestinion state 85% of them support MAKINGSovereignty PROGRESS NRG Poll, Jan 2016: Are you in favor of the gradual application of Israeli Law in Judea and Samaria? 44% in favor 44% 38% of gradual application In favor Not in favor of Israeli law in Judea and Samaria 18% No opinion 60% 61% 61% 69% 18% 32% of the youth favor of rightwingers of ultra-orthodox of those who dene of those who dene of those who dene the application of favor the favor the themselves themselves as themselves as leftwing the law on the application of law application of law rightwing favor the leftwingers favor the favor the application of entire area on the entire area on the entire area gradual application application of the law the law on the Jewish of the law on the entire area communities From Survival to Destiny The Jewish "Deal of the Century" Minister Haim Katz: Rep. Alan Clemmons: David P. Goldman: TAMAWe need a declaration of commitment 100 forIt is impossible the for Land a Jew to be of Israel Judea and Samaria in to Judea and Samaria as there was an occupier in his own ancestral a region of failed states. STRATEGICfor the Golan OUTLINE Heights PLAN | ISRAEL 2048 homeland, Judea Time is on Israel’s side Page 4 Page6 Page 12 2 / SOVEREIGNTY22
    [Show full text]
  • Neophyte Politicos, Tried Businessmen by SHLOMO MAITAL
    Neophyte politicos, tried businessmen By SHLOMO MAITAL 01/10/2013 10:25 Some fresh faces may help revitalize a Knesset that has lost respect and trust among ordinary Israelis. Photo by: Lahav Harkov The 19th Knesset will feature some fresh new faces among its 120 members, hopefully bringing new ideas on economics, business and entrepreneurship. They include Erel Margalit, a venture capitalist; Jacob Perry, veteran manager and business leader; Yair Shamir, entrepreneur, venture capitalist and until recently chair of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI); and Naftali Bennett, entrepreneur and now leader of the Bayit Yehudi party, the successor to the National Religious Party. All are relative neophytes in politics. In a political system that is more geriatric than creative, they bring welcome relief. Elections were called for January rather than October because of the inability of the coalition government to agree on a new budget. With the economy slowing, and the budget deficit growing, it was clear there was need for a painful NIS 15-20 billion ($4-$5.3 billion) budget cut. Yet the coalition parties could not agree on whose ox should be gored. They preferred to sweep the mess under the carpet and deal with it only after the election. According to the Bank of Israel, 2012 GDP growth was 3.3 percent. For 2013, the forecast calls for 3.8 percent growth. This is significantly higher than forecasted growth of the US or Europe. But the optimism stems in part from natural gas from the Tamar field, which when it comes on stream will contribute a full percentage point, or one-fourth, to total GDP growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Pre-Election Thoughts from Israel
    Some Pre-Election Thoughts from Israel I’m writing this in a Jerusalem café two and a half days before the polls open here for what all expect to be a truly fateful election. As an American who once expected to live here permanently, I have dual citizenship and, since Israel does not allow absentee voting except for diplomats, I came here to vote – and see old friends, of course. I’m glad I did, whatever the outcome. My friends generally share my views, so they are mostly voting for the left- Zionist Meretz, the center-left ‘Zionist Union’ (led by Yitzhak Herzog and Tzipi Livni), and a few for the ‘Joint List’, the uneasy amalgamation of ‘Arab parties’ and ‘Communists’ that was forced into existence by the new 3.25% vote threshold for getting into the Knesset. I put the party names in quotes since all these names and expressions are common usages but don’t necessarily represent what the words seem to mean. My most pleasant surprise is the sense of very cautious optimism which has greeted me. While no one can predict with any confidence a true change in Israel’s current trajectory, the chance of Bibi Netanyahu losing the election seems greater than most of us dared imagine a few weeks ago. Instead of the prime minister being the poster child and main attraction of his party, he now seems to have turned into its albatross. Not only for the ‘leftists,’ who are his natural enemies, but there seems an immense weariness and irritation with Bibi as a person, his family, and his style, as well as his policies, domestic and foreign.
    [Show full text]
  • That Is the Only Hope for This Nation!
    06/212/2021 NEWS AM - Ohad - Mineiee kolech אוהד מושקוביץ - מנעי קולך https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrOb0Pw0stk "I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. ...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda ...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." -- Bertrand Russell [Bertrand Arthur William Russell] (1872-1970) Philosopher, educator Read the Prophets & PRAY WITHOUT CEASING! That is the only hope for this nation! Please Pray that the world would WAKE UP! Time for a worldwide repentance! Remember ALL US soldiers fighting for our freedom around the world These Pray for those in our government to repent of their wicked corrupt ways. Folks Pray for BB – Severe West Nile Fever –still not mobile- improving! In Pray for RBH – cancer recurrence Prayer- Pray for DH – Mother going into hospice. Check often Pray for GB – bad reaction from Cancer drug They Pray for Ella – Child with serious problems Change! NOTE: Our prayer list was getting very long and there will little follow up. If you have people you want to have on the list please resubmit since we are revising it now– rdb] Pray that The Holy One will lead you in Your preparations for handling the world problems. – Have YOU made any preparations? Genesis 31:43And Laban answered and said to Jacob, The daughters are my daughters and the sons my sons. And the flocks are my flocks; yea, all which you see, it is mine and my daughters'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Premier Who Cried Gevalt: Why Netanyahu Lost His Majority by David Makovsky
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3184 The Premier Who Cried Gevalt: Why Netanyahu Lost His Majority by David Makovsky Sep 19, 2019 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Brief Analysis Whether due to institutional concerns, failed alarmist tactics, or turnout issues, Netanyahu’s seat tally shrank between rounds one and two, and time is now on Benny Gantz’s side. srael’s September 17 election ended with no bloc winning the 61 seats needed for a majority in the 120-seat I parliament. The current tally is 57 seats for the center-left bloc (led by the Blue and White Party with 33), and 55 seats for the right-wing bloc (led by the Likud Party with 31). As a result, the coalition formation process could take weeks, and a power-sharing arrangement seems the most likely (though not certain) outcome. The era of exclusive control by the country’s longest-serving premier, Binyamin Netanyahu, seems to be over, but it is too soon to say whether Blue-White leader Benny Gantz will succeed him. WHY DID NETANYAHU LOSE? T he results indicate that Netanyahu’s party lost eight seats between the April election and this week’s do-over vote, if one factors in the addition of Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon’s party. According to Israel’s Channel 13, the Likud leader blamed the outcome on outlying cities, which are normally strongholds for his party but did not turn out the way they have in past elections.
    [Show full text]