DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Study of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Study of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 The Torah and Community Formation: A Comparative Study of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 by Endale Sebsebe Mekonnen Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof Jeremy Punt Co-Supervisor: Prof Marius Johannes Nel March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entire work is my original work, that I am the sole author therefore (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Endale Sebsebe Mekonnen March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Previous studies on Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 have indicated the centrality of love therein while downplaying the role of the Law in the two documents. These studies also did not consider the role of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 within the overall arguments of the two books and in respect to their specific communities of Jesus followers. To date, there has also not been a study specifically devoted to comparing these two texts in order to investigate the role of the Law in their different communities of Jesus followers. This research aims to fill this lacuna in New Testament studies. This study analyses the respective rhetorical units in Romans and Matthew in order to examine the role of the Law in the identity formation process of the Jesus followers as they saw it. It attempts to answer two specific research questions: (1) What is the role of the summary of the Law in Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40? (2) What are Paul’s and Matthew’s positions in regard to the role of the Law according to the letter to the Romans and the Gospel of Matthew? This study utilised the socio-rhetorical method developed by Vernon Robbins. However, only two aspects of his multidisciplinary approach, namely the study of the inner- and the intertexture are used. A text-focused hermeneutical approach is employed due to the length of the respective books and the complexity of the issues they raise. The argumentative texture of Romans 13:8-14 focusses on the underlying assumptions of the argument, the presupposed audience and the relationship between the Law and love. The study of Matthew 22:34-40 investigated the repetitive texture, the topical progression of νομός and ἁγάπη, the narrative pattern, and the opening, middle and closing argumentative texture of Matthew 22:34-40. The intertextual study investigated the intertexture of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 to the Hebrew Bible, LXX, and Second Temple Jewish and Greco-Roman literature. The texts were also compared to discern the convergence and divergence of the two books (Romans and Matthew) on specific topics. Finally, the role of Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 was investigated and analysed. The research findings on Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 is that for Jesus followers, Romans 13:8-14 and Matthew 22:34-40 present the commandments of the Law under the name of love to shape their perceptible identity. To love God or one’s neighbour means ultimately to obey the commandments of the Law. It is the commandments of the Law that are actually practised under the name of love, for love is avoiding evil and doing good as prescribed in the commandments of the Law. Furthermore, the iii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za research concluded that the Gospel of Matthew is not an anti-Pauline text, instead the two texts converge in important aspects of the Law while the divergence is accounted for in their specific genre and concern. iv Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Opsomming Vorige studies van Romeine 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40 het op verskillende wyses op die sentraliteit van die liefde in beide geskrifte gewys en minder klem op die rol van die Wet geplaasHulle neem ook nie die plek van Romeine 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40 in ag binne die algemene argumente van die twee boeke en in hul spesifieke gemeenskap van Jesus-volgelinge nie. Daar bestaan nog nie navorsing wat hierdie twee tekste vergelyk, ten einde die rol van die Wet in die verskillende gemeenskappe Jesus- volgelinge te kan ondersoek nie. Hierdie studie beoog om die gaping in Nuwe Tesament-studies aan te spreek. Die studie ontleed die twee retoriese eenhede in Romeine en Mattheus, met die doel om die rol van die Wet in die identiteitsvorming van Jesus-volgelinge, soos vanuit hul perspektief, in Romeine en Matteus te ondersoek. Dit sal verder onderneem word na aanleiding van twee spesifieke navorsingsvrae: (1) Wat is die rol van die opsomming van die Wet in Romeinse 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40? (2) Wat is Paulus en Matteus se posisies met betrekking tot die rol van die Wet in hul onderskeie geskrifte? Die studie sal gebruikmaak van die sosio-retoriese metode soos ontwikkel deur Vernon Robbins. Daar sal egter slegs geselekteerde aspekte van sy voorgestelde multidimensionele metode benut word te wete die intra- en inter-tekstuur van die tekste. ‘n Teks-gefokusde hermeneutiese benadering sal verder in die studie benut word as gevolg van die omvang van die twee dokumente wat ondersoek word en die kompleksiteit van die kwessies wat hulle aanspreek. Die argumentatiewe tekstuur van Romeine 13:8-14 spreek die aannames onderliggend aan die argument aan, die veronderstelde gehoor daarvan en die verhouding tussen die Wet en die liefde. Die studie van Matteus 22:34-40 sal ‘n soortgelyke benadering volg deurdat dit op die herhalende tekstuur, die progressie rondom die onderwerpe van νομός en ἁγάπη, die narratiewe patrone, en die begin, middel en slot van die argumentatiewe tekstuur van Matteus 22:34- 40 sal let. Daar sal ook ‘n analise van die inter-tekstuur van Romeine 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40 in die Hebreeuse Bybel, LXX, Tweede Tempel Joodse en Grieks-Romeinse literatuur onderneem word. Die twee tekse wat ondersoek is, is verder vergelyk ten opsigte van die konvergensie en divergensie van die twee boeke (Romeine en Matteus) aan die hand van spesifieke temas. Ten slotte is die rol van Romeine 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40 ondersoek en ontleed. Die bevinding van die navorsing ten opsigte van Romeine 13:8-14 en Matteus 22:34-40 is dat dit vir die Jesus-volgelinge die bevele van die Wet onder die naam van die liefde saamgesnoer het ten einde hul unieke identiteit te vorm. Om God, of jou naaste lief te hê, beteken eintlik om die bepalings van die Wet v Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za te gehoorsaam. Dit is hierdie bepalings van die Wet wat beoefen moet word onder die naam van die liefde, want die liefde vermy die kwaad en doen eerder goeie dade soos wat deur die Wet voorgeskryf word. Verder het die navorsing tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat die Evangelie van Matteus nie 'n anti- Pauliniese teks is nie. Die twee tekste konvergeer naamlik ten opsigte van belangrike aspekte van die Wet, terwyl die divergensie tussen hulle aan hul verskillende genres en temas. vi Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisors Prof. Jeremy Punt and Prof. Marius Nel. Without their continued optimism concerning this work, insightful comments, gentle critique, encouragement, guidance and support, this study would hardly have been completed. I would also like to thank both my supervisors for providing me ample room to express my own voice. Therefore, for all the shortcomings in this study, I take full responsibility. I owe a great debt of gratitude to Shiloh Bible College Ethiopia and Fire Over Africa for granting me study leave and covering all my tuition, transportation, living expenses and one-year accommodation. I would like to thank Dr. Gary Munson, the president of Shiloh Bible College Ethiopia who supported me in his prayers throughout the years of my study, for his encouragement and advice and for raising the funds for my studies. I am also deeply grateful to George Whitefield College and Evangelical Research Fellowship in South Africa for granting me a bursary for accommodation, auspicious study facilities and a convenient environment where I could combine both rigorous academic work and a Christian walk. I am indebted to many of my colleagues who prayed, encouraged me and extended their warm fellowship to dispel my loneliness created by the many days of isolation from my family. Lastly, not least, my special gratitude goes to Meskerm Asefa, my wife, for lifting all family burdens from me and carrying all the responsibility of caring for our children, and for being patient with me while I was away, and for prayer and encouragementwithout ceasing in all the different seasons of my studies. I would also like to express my deepest appreciation to my children, Abiah, Amanuel, Elsa, Samuel and Selam for their prayers and understanding. vii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za List of Abbreviations General BCE Before Common Era CD The Cairo Damascus Document CE Common Era KJV King James Version LN Louw and Nida Greek-English Lexicon (in Bibleworks) LXX Septuagint (Ancient Greek Translation of the Old Testament) MT Masoretic Text Matt Matthew NAB New American Bible NAS New American Standard NIV New International Version NPP New Perspective on Paul RNPP Radical New Perspective on Paul NT New Testament OT Old Testament Rom Romans RSV Revised Standard Version SM The Sermon on the Mount TGL Thayer’s Greek Lexcon v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BINDING OBLIGATIONS in ROMANS 13:7: a SEMANTIC FIELD and SOCIAL CONTEXT Thomas M
    Tyndale Bulletin 48.2 (1997) 307-327. BINDING OBLIGATIONS IN ROMANS 13:7: A SEMANTIC FIELD AND SOCIAL CONTEXT Thomas M. Coleman Summary Insufficient attention has been given to the meaning of the four distinctive terms φόρος τέλος φόβος used in Romans 13:7: ‘tribute’ ( ), ‘tax’ ( ), ‘reverence’ ( ), and τιμή ‘honour’ ( ). This article will discuss these terms in relation to the Graeco- Roman semantic field of political obligation, dividing them into the categories of ‘tangible’ obligations (tribute and tax) and ‘intangible’ obligations (reverence and honour). We will also examine Romans 13:7 in light of the social context of the Neronean era, in which there was an increasing burden of taxation and the introduction of legal penalties for failure to show due reverence and honour to those in authority. I. Introduction Commentators have glossed over the significance of the four terms which Paul uses in Romans 13:7—terms which describe the obligations that Christians have toward civic authorities: ‘tribute’ φόρος τέλος φόβος τιμή ( ), ‘tax’ ( ), ‘reverence’ ( ), and ‘honour’ ( ). For example, in his pre-war commentary on Romans, R.C.H. Lenski commented, in regard to Romans 13:7, that there was no unique significance in Paul’s use of these terms.1 Lenski argued that the apostle’s ‘great positive principles… apply to all times, to us as well as to the Romans, to our relation to our secular government as well as to their relation to theirs’.2 C.E.B. Cranfield, likewise, discounted the particular relevance which Paul’s words may have had for the Roman Christians, but for different reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chapters of Romans
    Liberty University Scholars Crossing An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible 5-2018 The Chapters of Romans Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Chapters of Romans" (2018). An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Romans SECTION OUTLINE ONE (ROMANS 1) Paul opens his letter to the Roman church by talking about God's anger with sin. The opening chapter may be thought of as a trial, where God is the judge and sinful humans are the accused. I. THE COURT RECORDER (1:1-17): Here Paul, author of Romans, provides his readers with some pretrial introductory material. A. His credentials (1:1, 5): Paul relates four facts about himself. 1. He is a servant of Jesus (1:1a). 2. He is an apostle (1:1b). 3. He has been set apart to preach the gospel (1:1c). 4. He is a missionary to the Gentiles (1:5). B. His Christ (1:2-4) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 15 Resources
    Romans 15 Resources Previous Next Click chart to enlarge Chart from recommended resource Jensen's Survey of the NT - used by permission Romans Overview Chart - Charles Swindoll ROMANS ROAD to RIGHTEOUSNESS Romans 1:18-3:20 Romans 3:21-5:21 Romans 6:1-8:39 Romans 9:1-11:36 Romans 12:1-16:27 SIN SALVATION SANCTIFICATION SOVEREIGNTY SERVICE NEED WAY LIFE SCOPE SERVICE FOR OF OF OF OF SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION God's Holiness God's Grace God's Power God's Sovereignty Gods Glory In In In In The Condemning Justifying Sanctifying Saving Object of Sin Sinners Believers Jew and Gentile Service Deadliness Design Demonstration of Salvation of Sin of Grace Power Given Promises Fulfilled Paths Pursued Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Needed Credited Demonstrated Restored to Israel Applied God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness IN LAW IMPUTED OBEYED IN ELECTION DISPLAYED Slaves to Sin Slaves to God Slaves Serving God Doctrine Duty Life by Faith Service by Faith Modified from Irving L. Jensen's chart above HENRY ALFORD Romans 15 Commentary Romans 15 Commentary (Greek phrases translated) PAUL APPLE Romans Commentary JACK ARNOLD Romans 15:1-13 Power to Please Romans 15:14-33 The Concerns of a True Minister WAYNE BARBER Romans 14:22-15:3 Responsibilities Under Grace 16 Romans 15:4-13 Responsibilities Under Grace 17 Romans 15:14-16 Responsibilities Under Grace 18 Romans 15:17 A Right to Boast - Pt 1 Romans 15:17-18 A Right to Boast - Pt
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Week Romans Community Group Guide Copy.Pages
    ! ! Community Group ! ! Guide ! Romans 13:1-14| Week 15 | 5/11/2014 1. Look at the 4 critical gospel questions on the next page. Think through the questions out loud. How do they help you to see through a gospel lens? 2. Why is it important to think through the good news of what God has done before we think about what we must do? In other words, what has God already accomplished and what will your good-doing never accomplish? 3. When you read the 4 questions in reverse order (4 Questions to Identify your Idols on page 2), you can identify the motives and core beliefs of your actions. Think about these questions out loud. Do they help you? (An Example: I am living like it all rests upon me. I think I must be in control. God is not in control. God is either not powerful or he doesn’t care about me. Conclusion: I must be my own God.) 4. What is the main point in Romans 13:1-7? What are the similarities between living as a citizen of a country and living as a member of a household? 5. In what ways do we try to get around submitting to authorities? (Romans 13:1-7) 6. How does Romans 12:17-21 (in particular verse 18) speak to Romans 13:1-7? 7. What is it about human nature that pushes back against authority? How are you most tempted to rebel against authority? 8. There are a few acts of civil disobedience in the Bible (Moses, Daniel, and Esther to name a few).
    [Show full text]
  • NT503: the Epistle to the Romans Course Lecturer: Harold W
    COURSE SYLLABUS NT503: The Epistle to the Romans Course Lecturer: Harold W. Hoehner, ThD, PhD About This Course This course was originally created through the Institute of Theological Studies in association with the Evangelical Seminary Deans’ Council. There are nearly 100 evangelical seminaries of various denominations represented within the council and many continue to use the ITS courses to supplement their curriculum. The lecturers were selected primarily by the Deans’ Council as highly recognized scholars in their particular fields of study. Course Description The book of Romans is crucial to the understanding of salvation and sanctification. In this course,you will explore the rich truths of justification and other significant topics by completing an exegetical and theological study of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans in the Greek text. The course treats select historical, grammatical, structural, and lexical data that illumine the meaning of this important New Testament document. You will be encouraged to put textual theory into living practice. NOTE: This course assumes a basic skill in Greek exegesis and the ability to make grammatical and textual critical evaluations and to do Greek word studies. Course Objectives Upon completion of the course, you should be able to do the following: • Increase your Greek vocabulary and gain additional competence in grammatical analysis and translation of the Greek text of Romans. • Gain additional experience in doing exegesis from the Greek text in preparation for expository preaching and teaching. • Wrestle with selected theological issues and formulate exegetically defensible solutions. • Be involved in a study of Romans in order to be able to think through the argument of the Epistle as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 13:1-7—On the Abuse of Biblical Texts and Correlative Abuse
    Romans 13:1-7—On the Abuse of Biblical Texts and Correlative Abuse Thus, while Sessions’s appeal to biblical authorization has failed, the larger question is why. Is it that the Bible has been interpreted adequately and rejected by modern society? Or, might it be that a flawed interpretation of a Biblical text has been wielded to support a problematic ordinance, calling for a closer look this notorious passage from Romans? Indeed, the latter is the case, and here’s why. See Also: From Crisis to Christ (Abingdon Press, 2014). By Paul N. Anderson George Fox University Newberg, Oregon June 2018 Anything or anyone that has authority, appeal, or sway will be co-opted and used rhetorically by others. Write that down. Learn it. It will never not be so.1 That includes such authorities the governments, athletes, celebrities, puppies… and the Bible. And, one of the most appealed-to-yet-misused texts is Romans 13:1-7. The incident with Jeff Sessions last week punctuates this problem in unfortunate ways. The separation of children from parents at the border is needlessly traumatic, and more humane alternatives to managing immigration policies must be found by all three branches of government: the Administration, the Judiciary, and the Congress. Zero-tolerance warnings of children separated from their parents as a disincentive to illegal immigration is inhumanely cruel, but decrying the plight of children during one administration but not the previous three is a bit disingenuous. What is needed is a congressional bill that is compassionate, fair, and manageable— one that will endure from one administration to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans Commentaries & Sermons
    Romans Commentaries & Sermons Acts 1 Corinthians OVERVIEW CHART OF BOOK OF ROMANS Click chart to enlarge Chart from recommended resource Jensen's Survey of the NT - used by permission Romans Overview Chart - Charles Swindoll Source: Dr David Cooper Click to Enlarge ROMANS ROAD to RIGHTEOUSNESS Romans 1:18-3:20 Romans 3:21-5:21 Romans 6:1-8:39 Romans 9:1-11:36 Romans 12:1-16:27 SIN SALVATION SANCTIFICATION SOVEREIGNTY SERVICE NEED WAY LIFE SCOPE SERVICE FOR OF OF OF OF SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION God's Holiness God's Grace God's Power God's Sovereignty Gods Glory In In In In The Condemning Justifying Sanctifying Saving Object of Sin Sinners Believers Jew and Gentile Service Deadliness Design Demonstration of Salvation of Sin of Grace Power Given Promises Fulfilled Paths Pursued Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Needed Credited Demonstrated Restored to Israel Applied God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness IN LAW IMPUTED OBEYED IN ELECTION DISPLAYED Slaves to Sin Slaves to God Slaves Serving God Doctrine Duty Life by Faith Service by Faith Modified from Irving L. Jensen's chart above Rome in the Time of Paul (c. A.D. 60) The city plan below shows most of the features of the city of Rome that archaeologists have so far identified as dating from the time of Paul. Sections of the city would have been very impressive in his time, but most of the outstanding buildings visible in Rome today date to after his death.
    [Show full text]
  • We Made a Choice, Now What? Romans 13:1-7 a Very Interesting
    We Made a Choice, Now What? Romans 13:1-7 A very interesting news stories occurred some twenty-two years ago. For pastor Paul Revere, getting into Heaven was easy. Getting out was a problem. Reverend Paul Revere, of the non, “one if by land and two if by sea” fame, was the founder of a 34 acre kingdom just outside the state capital of Salem Oregon. He called it the Embassy of Heaven and sought to separate from secular government. Its members professed to be literal citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven and reject any ties to what they refer to as "worldly governments". The organization issued its own identity documents (including passports and drivers licenses), business licenses, motor vehicle title certificates and license plates. The last time Revere, who by the way whose legal name is still Craig Douglas Fleshm drove his white car out of the 34-acre Kingdom of Heaven on August 20, 1994, wound up in jail for displaying Heaven license plates and carrying a Heaven- issued driver's license. State officials didn’t heed Revere's claims of celestial citizenship. Nor did they believe the forested estate belonged to God and was thus exempt from county tax rolls. The courts of Marion County Oregon had another view – and eventually seized the land in 1997 and sold it at auction. That wasn’t the end of Paul Revere. The original Revere was said to have followed the famous “one if by land and two if by sea” comment with, “and I on the opposite shore will be”, decided to move toward the opposite shore of the United States but settled in Minnesota not too awful far from our own Ken Raasch’s place.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Christian's Duty to Government" • Romans 13:1-7 I
    "The Christian's Duty to Government" • Romans 13:1-7 I. INTRODUCTION A. The Coliseum 1. A door was opened and they came out in twos and threes as though pushed by a rough hand 2. Slowly, they gathered themselves together till their number reached three dozen 3. Then they made their away across the sandy floor of the Coliseum to somewhere near the center 4. Some men were dragging the lifeless body of a downed gladiator off through another door on the other side of the arena floor 5. He had been the third spectacle of the day; they were to be the fourth! 6. Slowly they lifted their eyes and looked around at the sea of faces peering down at them 7. It was a busy day at the Coliseum; the stands were nearly full 8. And thousands of eager eyes now looked at them 9. A trumpet was blown, and all eyes turned to Caesar's box 10. He held out his hand and everyone stopped breathing to see what his verdict would be 11. With a snap of his wrist, he threw his thumb down; 12. And by doing so, sealed the fate of 36 men women, and children 13. The crowd roared their delight; there would be more blood to satisfy their lust for entertainment this fine Spring day 14. The gate of an iron cage was dropped, and several lean lions bounded out on to the floor of the arena 15. The mothers picked up their little children; the fathers put their arms around their teenage sons 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Session #5: Romans 4 God's Greatest Gift. Faith of Abraham And
    Session #5: Romans 4 God’s Greatest Gift. Faith of Abraham and David. Salvation by Faith, not Works. The Resurrection. Notes Compiled by: Jeno Erdelyi – 2020 Session #5: Romans 4 God’s Greatest Gift. Faith of Abraham and David. Salvation by Faith, not Works. The Resurrection. Page 52 of 450 Session #5: Romans 4 God’s Greatest Gift. Faith of Abraham and David. Salvation by Faith, not Works. The Resurrection. Session 1: Introduction and Romans 1:1 - 1:7 Session 12: Romans 9:1 - 5 Introduction. Salutation. Attributes of the Trinity. Advantages of Being a Jew? Discussion of the Covenants. The Sceptre of Judah. Eschatological Heresies. Session 2: Romans 1:8 - 1:32 The Pagan Predicament. The Need for the Gospel. God’s Session 13: Romans 9:6 - 13 Righteousness Revealed Against Pagan Humanity. Has the Word of God Failed? Doctrine of Election. Session 3: Romans 2 Session 14: Romans 9:14 - 33 The Righteousness of God Revealed. Condemnation of Moral Man. God’s Sovereignty. Moses and Pharaoh. Gentiles Called. Stumbling Stone. Session 4: Romans 3 Advantages of Being a Jew? Case Against the Entire Human Race. Session 15: Romans 10:1 - 15 Why Does God Save Anyone? Rabbinical Expectations. Salvation by Faith Taught by Moses. “Whosoever...” Israel Present. Session 5: Romans 4 God’s Greatest Gift. Faith of Abraham and David. Salvation by Faith, Session 16: Romans 10:16 - 21 not Works. The Resurrection. Review of Post-Biblical History of Israel up to modern day. Session 6: Romans 5 Session 17: Romans 11:1 - 24 Peace With God. The Sequence to Maturity.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 12:17-13:10 & Quakers' Relation to the State
    Quaker Religious Thought Volume 116 116-117 combined Article 2 1-1-2011 Romans 12:17-13:10 & Quakers' Relation to the State Cherice Bock George Fox University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Bock, Cherice (2011) "Romans 12:17-13:10 & Quakers' Relation to the State," Quaker Religious Thought: Vol. 116 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol116/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Religious Thought by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMANS 12:17-13:10 & QUAKERS’ Relation TO THE State CheriCe BoCk he passages of Romans 12:17-21 and Romans 13:1-7, Talthough located side by side, have been used by historical and contemporary Christians to support opposite conclusions regarding Christians’ participation in war and violence with a pivotal focus on the Christian’s relation to the state. On one side of the debate, Romans 13:1-7 is cited as a clear statement that Christians should obey their governments in everything, because governments are instituted by God, furthering a doctrine of the divine right of kings. Therefore governmental authority should be questioned no more than the authority of God. Alternatively, Christian pacifists cite Romans 12:17-21 as a clear statement that God calls Christians to a life of nonviolence, “living peaceably with all,” never taking revenge, and overcoming evil with good.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 13 | POLITICS & the CHURCH
    Romans 13 | POLITICS & THE CHURCH Synopsis General wisdom says when you go to family gatherings, there are only two topics that are off limits: religion and politics. This section combines the two. There aren’t many passages in Scripture that explicitly talk about the church’s relationship to the state or political affairs. Romans 13 is one of those places. Like any passage of Scripture, however, we have to look at it within its larger context. This is obviously a section that could be conducive to chasing a rabbit down a trail. You might not stick to the script this week. As you see from this synopsis, there’s not much of a script! And that’s ok. We trust you, the leader, to have a good conversation that tries to get a handle on how Christians should approach the public square. The questions will be all over the place, but hopefully the commentary can help land us in a good spot. The key for the week is that Christians pledge their allegiance to Jesus first, then country. Not the other way around. There are options for how we can interact within our country, but we always look first to Christ. Not to the republicans (or the democrats). The reading is Romans 13. The focus passage for the week is Romans 13:1-10. ​ ​ ​ ​ The win this week: Discuss faith and politics without killing each other. Understand the ​ allegiance is first to Christ, then to the state. (Don’t align Christianity with a party. Jesus isn’t partisan.) However we interact with the state should be dominated by this one ethic.
    [Show full text]