DOCSLIB.ORG

The Teaching Program for Homer's Odyssey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Teaching Program for Homer's Odyssey From Tell me ODYSSEUS: The Teaching Program for Homer’s Odyssey 1. THE STORIES LEADING UP TO THE TROJAN WAR Zeus and the As the story goes, Zeus, the supreme god and leader of the Olympians, decided Cause of The there were too many mortals. His solution to this problem was to cause a war – a Trojan War very famous war; a war with stories that would live on forever. That war was the Trojan War. Zeus desired the beautiful sea nymph Thetis (an immortal). And he wasn’t the only one (some say Poseidon desired her as well). Zeus’ desire changed, however, Zeus when he heard the prophecy that a son born to Thetis would grow up to be And stronger than his father. Zeus knew what it was like for a son to overthrow his Thetis father—he had done exactly that in the battle of the Olympians against the Titans. Zeus was the leader of the Olympians; his father, Cronus, was the leader of the Titans. The Olympians won the battle. Zeus dethroned his father. Zeus became the leader. Thetis did not marry Zeus or any other immortal; she married Peleus—a mortal. Peleus and Thetis celebrated their wedding. But there was one big problem, Eris, the goddess of Strife, had been left off the guest-list. And she wasn’t happy about The Wedding it. Eris showed up at the wedding anyway, and she brought a gift—a Golden Apple Of Peleus inscribed with the words For the Fairest. Eris tossed the Apple into the middle of a And Thetis circle surrounded by three goddesses: Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite. Each goddess claimed she deserved the Golden Apple (see below). Apple Of Discord Zeus tried to calm the discord. It didn’t work. A judge was needed and Zeus did not want to be that judge, he did not want to pick “the fairest” from among the three. Why not? Because Hera was his very jealous wife, Athena was his favorite daughter, and Aphrodite did not like competitors. And all three goddesses were powerful—and all three had nasty tempers. Zeus decided to seek the help of his son Hermes. The three goddesses continued to argue about who was the fairest so Zeus told Hermes (his son, the messenger god) to take the three goddesses to Mount Ida The Judgment (near Troy) and ask Paris, a shepherd (who also happened to be very handsome) to of Paris judge the competition. Each goddess tried to persuade Paris that they deserved the apple, and each made a promise to him should she be the one chosen: Hera promised to make Paris the ruler of the world, Athena promised him success in all wars, and Aphrodite promised him the love of the most beautiful woman in the world. Paris declared Aphrodite the fairest. Paris’ decision meant he would receive the love of the most beautiful woman in the world. That woman was Helen. The Three HERA ATHENA APHRODITE Goddesses, Wife of Zeus Daughter of Zeus Goddess of beauty and love. and their Promises to Goddess of marriage Goddess of wisdom. Promised Paris the love of Paris Promised Paris he would be Promised Paris he would the most beautiful woman the ruler of the world. have success in all wars. in the world. Tell me ODYSSEUS ~ The TellmeOmuse® Teaching Program for Homer’s Odyssey © 2010 Joy Marie Sever 1. THE STORIES LEADING UP TO THE TROJAN WAR Backstory: Paris’ parents were Priam and Hecuba, the King and Queen of Troy. They were also the parents of Hector (famous leader of the Trojan army). While • pregnant with Paris, his mother Hecuba had a dream that was interpreted as a sign Birth of that the child she was carrying would grow up to be the cause of the fall of Troy. Paris (also Priam and Hecuba were ordered to kill their infant son. Unable to do that, they known as Paris instead gave their son to a shepherd, and told him to kill the infant by leaving him Alexander) alone on Mount Ida. The shepherd followed their instructions, but when he found • the infant still alive after a few days, he decided to raise the child as his own son. Years later, the handsome Paris would eventually end up back at the home of his true parents, King Priam and Queen Hecuba. His sister Cassandra recognized the commoner Paris as her royal brother and told her parents, who then welcomed Paris into the family – ignoring the prophecy they had been told years earlier. After judging the contest and selecting Aphrodite as the fairest, Paris announced that he was going to sail to Sparta. His destination: the home of Menelaus and his Paris wife Helen. His purpose: to get Helen and bring her back to Troy. Those who knew Abducts the prophecy warned Paris not to go. Paris did not listen. Helen When Paris arrived in Sparta, Menelaus welcomed him and entertained him, as was the sacred guest tradition during that time. During Paris’ visit, Menelaus was called away to attend a funeral and he asked Helen to take care of Paris. When Menelaus returned from his trip – Paris was gone. And so was Helen, who by this time had fallen in love with Paris (fulfilling Aphrodite’s promise to Paris). Also missing were many of Menelaus’ treasures. Another Backstory: Helen was so beautiful that many noble men from the surrounding cities wanted to marry her. Seeing this, Odysseus (known for his intelligence) told Helen’s mortal father Tyndareus that he should ask all of Helen’s • suitors to swear an oath to support whoever was chosen to be Helen’s husband. Oath of That oath would be their promise to defend the interests of Helen’s husband, Tyndareus should those interests ever be threatened. • Odysseus was among the many men who swore the oath, but he didn’t do it in the hope of winning Helen. Odysseus gave Tyndareus the idea for the oath, and swore the oath himself, in exchange for Tyndareus’ help in marrying Penelope1 (a niece of Tyndareus). Helen ultimately chose Menelaus as her husband (some say it was her father who made the choice). Achaeans Menelaus returned to Sparta from his trip and discovered that Paris and Helen and Declare War many of his treasures were gone. Outraged, he immediately notified his brother Against The Agamemnon, King of Mycenae. Soon, all the men who had sworn the oath to Trojans Tyndareus were called to honor that oath. The Achaeans began to assemble their ships and crews, they were going to Troy to get Helen and bring her home! 1 When all the other men wanted Helen, Odysseus wanted Penelope. Odysseus and Penelope are both known for their intelligence. Penelope married Odysseus even though her father Icarius did not approve (he tried to stop his daughter from leaving with Odysseus, but she left anyway). The beautiful Helen and the clever Penelope were cousins—their fathers, Tyndareus and Icarius, were brothers. Helen was also the sister of Clytemnestra, wife of Agamemnon. Tell me ODYSSEUS ~ The TellmeOmuse® Teaching Program for Homer’s Odyssey © 2010 Joy Marie Sever .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odyssey Glossary of Names
    GLOSSARY OF NAMES GLOSSARY OF NAMES [Note, the following is raw output from OCR software, and is otherwise unedited.] (First appearance noted by book and line number.) Achaeans (A-kee'-unz): General term used by Homer to reFer to Greeks. 2.139 Acheron (A'-ker-on): River in the Underworld, land of the dead. 10.537 Achilles (A-kil'-eez): Son of Peleus and Thetis. He is the heroic leader of the Myrmidons in the Trojan War and is slain by Paris. Odysseus consults him in the Underworld. 3.117 Aeaea (Ee-ee'-a): Island on which Circe lives. 9.34 Aegisthus (Ee-jis'-thus): Son of Thyestes and Pelopia. He seduces Clytemnestra, wife of Agamemnon, while Agamemnon is away fighting the Trojan War and helps her slay Agamemnon when he returns. Orestes avenges this action years later by murdering both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus. 1.35 GLOSSARY OF NAMES Aegyptus (Ee-jip'-tus): The Nile River. 4.511 Aeolus (Ee'-oh-lus): King of the island Aeolia and keeper of the winds. 10.2 Aeson (Ee'-son): Son oF Cretheus and Tyro; father of Jason, leader oF the Argonauts. 11.262 Aethon (Ee'-thon): One oF Odysseus' aliases used in his conversation with Penelope. 19.199 Agamemnon (A-ga-mem'-non): Son oF Atreus and Aerope; brother of Menelaus; husband oF Clytemnestra. He commands the Greek Forces in the Trojan War. He is killed by his wiFe and her lover when he returns home; his son, Orestes, avenges this murder. 1.36 Agelaus (A-je-lay'-us): One oF Penelope's suitors; son oF Damastor; killed by Odysseus.
    [Show full text]
  • Loeb Lucian Vol5.Pdf
    THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LL.D. EDITED BY fT. E. PAGE, C.H., LITT.D. litt.d. tE. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. tW. H. D. ROUSE, f.e.hist.soc. L. A. POST, L.H.D. E. H. WARMINGTON, m.a., LUCIAN V •^ LUCIAN WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY A. M. HARMON OK YALE UNIVERSITY IN EIGHT VOLUMES V LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS MOMLXII f /. ! n ^1 First printed 1936 Reprinted 1955, 1962 Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF LTTCIAN'S WORKS vii PREFATOEY NOTE xi THE PASSING OF PEBEORiNUS (Peregrinus) .... 1 THE RUNAWAYS {FugiUvt) 53 TOXARis, OR FRIENDSHIP (ToxaHs vd amiciHa) . 101 THE DANCE {Saltalio) 209 • LEXiPHANES (Lexiphanes) 291 THE EUNUCH (Eunuchiis) 329 ASTROLOGY {Astrologio) 347 THE MISTAKEN CRITIC {Pseudologista) 371 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE GODS {Deorutti concilhim) . 417 THE TYRANNICIDE (Tyrannicidj,) 443 DISOWNED (Abdicatvs) 475 INDEX 527 —A LIST OF LUCIAN'S WORKS SHOWING THEIR DIVISION INTO VOLUMES IN THIS EDITION Volume I Phalaris I and II—Hippias or the Bath—Dionysus Heracles—Amber or The Swans—The Fly—Nigrinus Demonax—The Hall—My Native Land—Octogenarians— True Story I and II—Slander—The Consonants at Law—The Carousal or The Lapiths. Volume II The Downward Journey or The Tyrant—Zeus Catechized —Zeus Rants—The Dream or The Cock—Prometheus—* Icaromenippus or The Sky-man—Timon or The Misanthrope —Charon or The Inspector—Philosophies for Sale. Volume HI The Dead Come to Life or The Fisherman—The Double Indictment or Trials by Jury—On Sacrifices—The Ignorant Book Collector—The Dream or Lucian's Career—The Parasite —The Lover of Lies—The Judgement of the Goddesses—On Salaried Posts in Great Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • WRATH of ACHILLES: the MYTHS of the TROJAN WAR “The Feast of Peleus”
    SING, GODDESS OF THE WRATH OF ACHILLES: THE MYTHS OF THE TROJAN WAR “The Feast Of Peleus” E. Burne-Jones (1872-81) Eris The Greek Goddess of Chaos Paris and the nymph Oinone happy on Mt. Ida Peter Paul Rubens, “Judgment Of Paris” Salvador Dali, “The Judgment of Paris” (1960-64) “Paris and Helen,” Jacques-Louis David (1788) “The Abduction of Helen” From an illuminated edition of Ovid’s Metamorphosis (late 15th c.) OATH OF TYNDAREUS When Helen reached marriageable age, the greatest kings and warriors from all Greece sought to win her hand. They brought magnificent gifts to her mortal father Tyndareus. The suitors included Ajax, Peleus, Diomedes, Patroclus and Odysseus. In return for Tyndareus’ niece Penelope in marriage, Odysseus drew up an oath to be taken by all the suitors. They would swear to accept the choice of Tyndareus. If any man ever took Helen by force, they would fight to regain her for her lawful husband. Tyndareus selected Menelaus, king of Sparta, who had brought the most valuable gifts. “Odysseus’ Induction,” Heywood Hardy (1874) “Thetis Dips Achilles Into The River Syx” Antoine Borel (18th c.) Achilles taught to play the lyre by Chiron Jan de Bray, “The Discovery of Achilles Among the Daughters of Lycomedes” [1664] Aulis today Achilles wounds Telephus in Mysia Iphigenia, Achilles, Clytemnestra and Agamemnon at Aulis “Sacrifice of Iphigenia at Aulis,” A wall painting from the House of the Tragic Poet at Pompeii 63-70 CE Peter Pietersz Lastman, “Orestes and Pylades Disputing the Altar” (1614) Philoctetes with Heracles’ bow on Lemnos Protesilaus steps ashore at Troy Patroclus separates Briseis from Achilles Briseis and Agamemnon Jean-Auguste Dominique Ingres, “Jupiter and Thetis” (1811) Paris and Menelaus in single combat Aeneas and Aphrodite were both wounded by Diomedes “Achilles Receives Agamemnon’s Messengers,” Jacques-Louis David (1801) “Helen on the Walls of Troy,” -Gustave Moreau, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid's Wife in the Tristia and Epistulae Ex Ponto
    OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN (Under the Direction of T. KEITH DIX) ABSTRACT Augustus exiled Ovid to Tomis in AD 8 in part, the poet says, because of his carmen, the Ars Amatoria. Ovid presents the misfortunes of exile in two collections of elegiac epistles, the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. As the recipient of nine epistles, Ovid’s wife is his most frequent addressee. Other poems throughout the two works also mention her. Ovid models the persona of his wife in the exile poetry on characters he developed in the Amores, Heroides, and Ars Amatoria. She appears initially as an abandoned heroine, then as a beloved from whom Ovid seeks fulfillment of his needs, and eventually becomes a pupil in imperial courtship. The resulting “conjugal love elegy” does not replace his earlier erotic elegy but recasts it as a means for Ovid to lament his misfortunes, present a new image for his poet-narrator, and immortalize his genius. INDEX WORDS: Augustus, Coniunx, Elegy, Epistolary Poetry, Epistulae, Exile, Latin, Livia, Ovid, Ovid’s wife, Tristia OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN B.A., The University of Minnesota, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Amy Nohr Petersen All Rights Reserved OVID’S WIFE IN THE TRISTIA AND EPISTULAE EX PONTO: TRANSFORMING EROTIC ELEGY INTO CONJUGAL ELEGY by AMY NOHR PETERSEN Major Professor: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna
    Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna 2005 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Akujärvi, J. (2005). Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis. Almqvist & Wiksell International. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Studia Graeca et Latina Lundensia 12 Researcher, Traveller, Narrator Studies in Pausanias’ Periegesis Johanna Akujärvi Lund 2005 Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm/Sweden © 2005 Johanna Akujärvi Distributed by Almqvist & Wiksell International P.O. Box 7634 S-103 94 Stockholm Sweden Phone: + 46 8 790 38 00 Fax: + 46 8 790 38 05 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1100-7931 ISBN 91-22-02134-5 Printed in Sweden Media-Tryck, Lund University Lund 2005 To Daniel Acknowledgements There are a number of people to whom I wish to express my gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Aspects of Spartan Kingship in Herodotus Rosaria Vignolo Munson
    5 Three Aspects of Spartan Kingship in Herodotus Rosaria Vignolo Munson erodotus’ Histories are governed by the rule of resemblance: they explain the nature of a given historical phenomenon by sug­ gesting similarities to unrelated phenomena entirely different in Hother respects.! We may safely state, in particular, that Herodotus’ analysis of any form of personal power is inseparable from his representation of monarchical rule. This was an essential feature of the foreign culture that threatened the integrity of Hellas at the time of the Persian wars, and it provided the Greeks with a foil for self-definition. The components of the monarchical model in Herodotus have often been discussed,^ and I need only to recall a few points. The speech of Otanes in the Constitutional Debate is the basic theoretical document (3.80). The monarch is here defined as an individual who “can do what he wants without being accountable” (dvevOvvco Trottem ra /SouXerat). When placed in such a position, even the best of men finds himself outside the normal way of thinking (/cat yap av tov aptcTOV avhputv TravTwv (TTavTU e? TavTTjv TTjv apy^v e/cxd? twv ewOoToiv voripdraiv cTTpcreid) and commits many unbearable things (iroWd /cal dracrOaka) out of u/3pts and cpOovos. Typically, the monarch subverts ancestral laws (Ttarpta vopaia), he does violence to women, and he puts people to death without trial. I am happy to dedicate this chapter to Martin Ostwald with gratitude and admiration. 1. The importance of analogical thought in Herodotus is widely recognized. See espe­ cially the work of Immerwahr (1966) and Lateiner (1989, 191-96).
    [Show full text]
  • A Character Analysis of Penelope in the Penelopiad
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® English 100 & 200 Conference English Student Writing Spring 2017 A Heroine in Her Own Right: A Character Analysis of Penelope in The eP nelopiad Ar’Meishia Burrow Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/eng_100_200_conf Part of the American Literature Commons, Classics Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Burrow, Ar’Meishia, "A Heroine in Her Own Right: A Character Analysis of Penelope in The eP nelopiad" (2017). English 100 & 200 Conference. Paper 5. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/eng_100_200_conf/5 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in English 100 & 200 Conference by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Burrow 1 Ar’Meishia Burrow Dr.Wes Berry English 200 2 December 2016 A Heroine in Her Own Right: A Character Analysis of Penelope in The Penelopiad When reading or viewing a text one must always keep in mind the perspective. It is amazing how much the point of view of the text impacts the interpretation of the story. Through our study of connections between Ancient and Contemporary Literature I have seen this direct relationship demonstrated clearly in Homer’s Odyssey and The Penelopiad, written by Margaret Atwood. In studying the latter novel I have developed a deeper appreciation and respect for the character Penelope, wife of Odysseus, for her resilience, endurance, and intelligence. With those three characteristics Penelope becomes the captain of her own ship and uses her strengths to outwit her oppressors.
    [Show full text]
  • THEAGON the Long-Awaited Entry of Menelaus at Line 348 Marks The
    CHAPTER THREE THEAGON INTRODUCTION The long-awaited entry of Menelaus at line 348 marks the commencement of the plot proper, following the lengthy series of expository scenes with which the play opens. The ensuing scene is a crucial one because our understanding of Orestes' character and of the general tenor of the play depends largely on our interpretation of the tactics employed by Orestes before Menelaus and particularly in the agon with Tyndareus. Chapter Two examined the place of the scene within the general structure of Orestes and the characterization of Menelaus. We have noted (above, pp. 70-73) how Menelaus' rejection of Orestes' plea is presented as a triumph of base self-interest over the demands of xapts and cpLALa. We have also seen the way in which Euripides deliberately emphasizes Menelaus' treachery (in a manner reminiscent of Medea's Jason and Hecuba's Odysseus) in order to portray the latter's perfidy as one link in the series of injustices that eventually lead to Orestes' violent and bloodthirsty reaction. The present chapter will examine more closely the speeches presented by Orestes and Tyndareus in the course of the agon, as well as Orestes' vcrnpos Myos following the departure of the irascible Spartan elder. In the past, the interpretation of these speeches has proven to be a particularly thorny problem. The difficulty may be summed up as follows: whereas the words of Tyndareus, for all of their vehemence and unpleasantness, present a case that appears to be both reasonable and founded upon objective concerns for justice and social order, the arguments of Orestes, the putative hero of the play, are felt to be extraordinarily bad, abounding in sophistries and in extravagancies both of speech and of thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury These Texts Can Be Signed out in Ms
    9 Honors Summer Reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson As you read the novel, take notes, using the rubric to guide you. These notes will be collected and graded one day during the first week of school. They will help you with our class discussions and in-class assignments. Consider and take notes on the following as you read: • Setting: What is the setting? How does the impact the plot and characters? How does it further the themes? • Characters/Character Traits: Identify the character traits for each of the main characters. What do you like or dislike about the characters? Are they dynamic or static? What are the characters’ motivations? • Conflicts: What are the central conflicts in each piece? Consider both internal and external conflicts. Are they resolved? • Quotes: Identify and explain the context and significance of quotes that you feel are important or interesting. Cite page numbers. • Literary Style and Technique: What do you notice about the author’s style and/or use of literary elements? (Foreshadowing, irony, imagery, symbolism, metaphor, etc.) Provide examples and explain how they add to the meaning of the text. • Topics for Theme (Reminder, a topic is a subject that is discussed throughout a piece of literature, and the theme is the claim that the author makes about the subject.): What themes can you identify? What was the author’s purpose in writing the book? • Questions: What questions do you have as you read? 9H Summer Reading Notes Rubric 4 3 2 1 Content - all notes are relevant -most notes are
    [Show full text]
  • Symphony Hall, Boston Huntington and Massachusetts Avenues
    SYMPHONY HALL, BOSTON HUNTINGTON AND MASSACHUSETTS AVENUES Branch Exchange Telephones, Ticket and Administration Offices, Back Bay 1492 toe Bymmpltoey Orchestra INC. SERGE KOUSSEVITZKY, Conductor FORTY-FOURTH SEASON, 1924-1925 Programme WITH HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE NOTES BY PHILIP HALE COPYRIGHT, 1924, BY BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, INC. THE OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES OF THE BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, Inc. FREDERICK P. CABOT President GALEN L. STONE Vice-President ERNEST B. DANE Treasurer FREDERICK P. CABOT ERNEST B. DANE . HENRY B. SAWYER M. A. DE WOLFE HOWE GALEN L. STONE JOHN ELLERTON LODGE BENTLEY W. WARREN ARTHUR LYMAN E. SOHIER WELCH W. H. BRENNAN. Manager G. E. JUDD, Assistant Manager 505 — THE INST%U£MENT OF THE IMMORTALS IT IS true that Rachmaninov, Pader- Each embodies all the Steinway ewski, Hofmann—to name but a few principles and ideals. And each waits of a long list of eminent pianists only your touch upon the ivory keys have chosen the Steinway as the one to loose its matchless singing tone, perfect instrument. It is true that in to answer in glorious voice your the homes of literally thousands of quickening commands, to echo in singers, directors and musical celebri- lingering beauty or rushing splendor ties, the Steinway is an integral part the genius of the great composers. of the household. And it is equally true that the Steinway, superlatively fine as it is, comes well within the There is a Steinway dealer in your range of the moderate income and community or near you through 'whom meets all the requirements of the you may purchase a new Steinway modest home.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Odysseus M
    THE WORLD OF ODYSSEUS M. I. FINLEY INTRODUCTION BY BERNARD KNOX NEW YORK REVIEW BOOKS CLASSICS THE WORLD OF ODYSSEUS M. I. FINLEY (1912–1986), the son of Nathan Finkelstein and Anna Katzellenbogen, was born in New York City. He graduated from Syracuse University at the age of fifteen and received an MA in public law from Columbia, before turning to the study of ancient history. During the Thirties Finley taught at Columbia and City College and developed an interest in the sociology of the ancient world that was shaped in part by his association with members of the Frankfurt School who were working in exile in America. In 1952, when he was teaching at Rutgers, Finley was summoned before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee and asked whether he had ever been a member of the Communist Party. He refused to answer, invoking the Fifth Amendment; by the end of the year he had been fired from the university by a unanimous vote of its trustees. Unable to find work in the US, Finley moved to England, where he taught for many years at Cambridge, helping to redirect the focus of classical education from a narrow emphasis on philology to a wider concern with culture, economics, and society. He became a British subject in 1962 and was knighted in 1979. Among Finley’s best-known works are The Ancient Economy, Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology, and The World of Odysseus. BERNARD KNOX is director emeritus of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies in Washington, DC. Among his many books are The Heroic Temper, The Oldest Dead White European Males, and Backing into the Future: The Classical Tradition and Its Renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • Liminal Leda: a Conversation About Art, Poetry, and Vague Translations of Sex Molly Pistrang [email protected]
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College English Honors Papers English Department 2013 Liminal Leda: A Conversation about Art, Poetry, and Vague Translations of Sex Molly Pistrang [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/enghp Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Pistrang, Molly, "Liminal Leda: A Conversation about Art, Poetry, and Vague Translations of Sex" (2013). English Honors Papers. 12. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/enghp/12 This Honors Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the English Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Liminal Leda: A Conversation about Art, Poetry, and Vague Translations of Sex An Honors Thesis Presented by Molly Alyssa Pistrang to The Department of Literatures in English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Major Field Connecticut College New London, Connecticut May 2013 Dedication To Leda, whoever you are Acknowledgments First, I want to thank Professor John Gordon, an incredible professor and man. Through him, my eyes have been opened to language in a way I never knew possible. As my thesis advisor, he directed me and also motivated me to push myself. I cannot overestimate his influence on my education and am forever grateful for the honor of working with him.
    [Show full text]