STUDY of LUNAR, PLANETARY and SOLAR Topografhy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STUDY of LUNAR, PLANETARY and SOLAR Topografhy 4 STUDY OF LUNAR, PLANETARY AND SOLAR TOPOGRAfHY By: D.A. Richards, J.D. Gallatin, and R.O. Breault CAL NO. VC-2104-0-2 Prepared for: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Electronics Research Center Space Optics Laboratory Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Final Report Contract No. NAS 12-19 July 1967 (CATEGORY) .- OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY, BU’FFALO, N. Y. 14221 , + CORNELL AERONAUT1 CAL LABORATORY , I NC. BUFFALO, NEW YORK L,14221 / i?- [PROJECT TECH TOP STUDY OF LUNAR, PLANETARY AND SOLAR TOPOGRAPHYiP BY: D.A. RICHARDS J.D. GALLATIN R.O. BREAULT’! h PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ELECTRONICS RESEARCH CENTER SPACE OPT1 CS LABORATORY CAMBR I DGE, MASSACHUSETTS 021 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Objectives ...................... 1.2 Tasks Accomplished ................ 1. 3 Report Organization ................ 1.4 Acknowledgements ................. 2 REVIEW OF FIRST PHASE 5 2 . 1 Areas of Consideration .............. 5 2.2 First Phase Recommendations .......... 9 2 . 3 Plan for Second Phase ............... 10 3 PLANETARY TOPOGRAPHY 13 3 . 1 Introduction ..................... 13 3.2 System Analysis .................. 14 3.2.1 Concept .................. 14 3.2.2 Considerations .............. 15 3.2.3 Model ................... 19 3 . 3 Image Restoration ................. 22 3 . 3 . 1 Introduction ................ 22 3.3.2 Tone .................... 24 3.3. 3 Position .................. 24 3.3.4 Detail ................... 25 3 . 3 . 5 Other Considerations ........... 26 3.4 Mapping Considerations .............. 26 3.4. 1 Exposure Times for Star Cameras .... 27 3.4.2 Laser Rangefinder Considerations .... 28 3.5 Recommendations ................. 29 ... 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Contd. Section Page 4 SOLAR TOPOGRAPHY 35 4. 1 Introduction ..................... 35 4.2 Theoretical Aspects ................ 36 4.2.1 Concepts. ................. 36 4.2.2 Phenomena ................ 37 4.2.3 Problems ................. 40 4.2.4 Modeling ................. 43 4. 3 Engineering Aspects ................ 44 4. 3. 1 Engineering Considerations for a Solar Probe ................... 44 4. 3.2 Cooperating Vehicles ........... 45 4. 3. 3 Solar Instrumentation ........... 47 4.4 Experimental Aspects ............... 49 4.4. 1 An Active Probe of the Sun ........ 49 4.4.2 Fourier Transform Spectroscopy .... 50 4. 5 Recommendations ................. 50 5 APPENDICES 55 Planetary C ons iderations P-1 System Analysis for Planetary Task ........... 57 P -2 Image Restoration in General .............. 71 P-3 Automatic Stereocompilation ............... 109 P -4 Image RestorationExamples ............... 127 P-5 Star Camera Exposure ................... 135 P -6 Laser Rangefinder Considerations ............ 143 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS. Contd . Section Page Solar Considerations s-1 Differential Heliorotation .................. 151 s -2 Solar Granulation ...................... 177 s-3 Solar Flares ......................... 187 s -4 Solar Atmospheric Model .................. 193 s-5 Engineering Considerations for Solar Probe ........ 231 S -6 Cooperating Vehicles .................... 253 s -7 Solar Instrumentation .................... 263 S -8 Active Probe of the Sun ................... 291 s-9 Fourier TransformSpectroscopy ...... ........ 301 B-1 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................... 319 V LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Representative Synthesis of System Response Function. 21 2 Lens-Film Response Functions .............. 23 3 Use of Cooperating Vehicles for Communications ..... 47 Aperture Limit. ...................... 66 Capability of Detector ................... 68 Orbital Motion Limit ................... 69 Optical C ross-Correlator ................. 79 Spatial Filtering Apparatus ................ 85 Illustrating C onne c t ion Be tw een Mult ipath T rans miss ion Analysis and Inhomogeneous Image Restoration ... 103 Spectrum of Half Tone Exposure ............. 104 Geometry of Stereo Projection .............. 112 Information Flow in Aerial Contouring (Partial) ..... 115 Information Flow Including Data Link ........... 121 Lunar Orbiter I High Resolution Photograph which contains Uncompensated Motion ................ 129 Same Photograph Deblurred by the use of a Spatial Filter (Approximate Inverse) ................ 130 Similar Enhancement made from Negative instead of Positive used for Figure Z(P4) ............ 131 Enhancement by Photographic Implementation of the Differentiation Technique suggested by Harris (see text) ....................... 133 Illustration of Range Cell Analysis ............ 148 Solar Rotation Rate as derived by a Number of Authors from Sunspot Data ................... 159 The Rotation of the Sun .................. 160 Spectral Line Width .................... 165 Illustration of Equations .................. 169 Cell Sizes of Granulation Patterns ............ 180 vii LIST OF FIGURES. Contd. Page Assumptions and Their Parameters ............ 195 The Electromagnetic Spectrum ............... 197 The Optical Window in the Earth's Atmosphere ...... 198 Attenuation of Radiation with Depth ............. 204 Geometric Depth ....................... 206 Optical Depth. Temperature and Height .......... 213 Billowy Granulation ..................... 215 The Continuous Absorption of H- ............... 217 Equivalent Width of a Line ................. 220 A Curve of Growth ..................... 221 One- and Two-Impulse Methods .............. 232 Velocity Requirements ................... 233 Performance of Solar Probe ................ 235 Six-Month Orbit Relative to Sun-Earth-Axis ........ 236 Velocity Requirements for Orbits about Sun and Out of Ecliptic Plane ..................... 237 Ideal Burnout Velocity ................... 238 Power of Deflectable Solar Cell Panel ........... 240 Solar Cell Output ...................... 242 Temperatures for Capsule and Independent Heat Shield . 248 Illumination Distribution as a Function of Distance .... 265 Half Light Intensity ..................... 267 Prime Focus with Corrective Telephoto Lens ....... 269 A Cassegrainian Focus Telescope ............. 270 Newtonian Focus ...................... 270 CoudEFocus ......................... 271 Obscuration Effects on a Cassegrainian Type Telescope . 276 Rowland's Circle for Concave Grating ........... 278 viii LIST OF FIGURES. Contd . Figure 9(57) The All-Reflecting Wadsworth Mounting of the Concave Grating., ....................... 279 1O(S7) Construction of a Spectroheliograph ............ 282 11(S7) Babcock Magnetograph at Mount Wilson .......... 286 Michelson Interferometer ................. 303 ix LIST OF TABLES Table Page I Possible Methods of Obtaining Topographical Information . 6 I1 Requirements to Obtain Topographical Information by Stereoscopy ....................... 7 111 Divisions and Subsystems of a System ........... 17 IV The Subsystems of the Acquisition Division of a Stereo Imagery System .................... 18 V Key Parameters of the Planets and the Moon ....... 20 Planetary Motion Data ................... 59 Planetary Atmospheres ................... 61 Planetary Data ......................... 62 Characteristics of Halftone Stripping Processes ...... 94 Solar Rotation as a Function of Solar Latitude ....... 161 Predicted Einstein Shifts .................. 168 Solar Flare Characteristics ................ 188 I(S4) Energy Attenuation ..................... 205 Ib(S4) Optical and Geometric Depth at the Solar Limb ...... 207 I11 (S4) Empirical Model ....................... 212 IV (54) Height and Temperature Correlation ............ 214 v (S4 1 Temperature as a Function of Optical Depth ........ 214 VI (S4) Relative Elemental Abundances Adopted for the Sun .... 224 VI1(S4) Relation between Gas and Electron Pressure for a Solar-like Abundance ....................... 225 VIII(S4) Theoretical Model by Munch (1947) ............. 227 IX(S4) Models of Solar Photosphere ................ 228 X(S4) Adopted Photospheric Model ................ 228 X(S5) Booster Data ........................ 235 E651 Experimental Data Reduction of Solar Cell Efficiency due to Particle Bombardment ................. 243 III(S5) Attitude Control Systems .................. 245 xi LIST OF TABLES. Contd . Table Page IV(S5) SDlar Probe Data ...................... 249 1~37) Large Telescopes Presently in Use ............ 264 II(S7) Diffraction-Limited Resolving Power for Some Major Telescopes ....................... 267 xii SUMMARY This is the final report of a program (Project TECH TOP) to assess the state of the art and to make recommendations for future research in topographic information collection systems for planetary and solar inves - tigation. The present report includes a brief review of the first phase effort and a more extensive presentation of the results of the second phase. The second phase continued analysis of planetary topography to include the initiation of a detailed system analysis, a review and analysis of image restoration processes and their application to space imagery, and some mapping considerations for a stereo imagery system. Three major aspects of solar topography, theoretical, engineering and experimental, were investigated. The theoretical aspects concerned the concepts, phenomena and problems of major importance to the study of the sun. The engineering aspects concerned solar probe feasibility and survivability, the use of cooperating vehicles, and earth-based solar instrumentation. Two experimental possibilities were examined involving the use of an active backscatter probe of the sun and the use of Fourier transform spectroscopy
Recommended publications
  • Elias Acevedo Travis Adams Trevor Adams Storme Adkins Ricky Amador Linda Allen Dylan Allison Isaac Allison Nathaniel Aguirre Allison
    Elias Acevedo Travis Adams Trevor Adams Storme Adkins Ricky Amador Linda Allen Dylan Allison Isaac Allison Nathaniel Aguirre Allison Steven Allison Morgan Amerto Candela Arturo Arriaga Efrain Arriaga Jessica Aten Chase Baird Andrew Baldwin Sarah Ballard Anderson Rojas Benjamin Ballew Christian Banks Matthew Bartlett Regina Bartlett Andrew Beasley Dawson Beck Kieran Becker Brandon Bennett Payton Berryhill Hienzelleman Alyson Adrian Blackwell Caylie Aubrey Boeke Jeremy Bonner Charity Boylen Kyle Bradley Rodney Bradley Beverly Blackwelder Blankenship Hunter Bray Lorene Bristol Rachel Brooks David Brown Parker Brown Kristopher Aaron Buchanan Jacob Buchanan Magnolia Bryant Buchanan Taylor Buchanan Kimberly Kasey Burnette Mariya Burnette Seth Burnette Kynieshra Burns Crislyn Buzbee Ysabela Cable Ashley Cadwell Burleson Abby Calhoun Eduardo Dylan Campbell Ivy Carroll Katelyn Carroll Shawn Carroll Taven Carson Julie Carver Rebecca Caudill Campanur Sarah Causby Kyle Chapman Josie Chilcote Hailey Clark Lesley Clark Mackenzie Clark Coby Conley Hannah Conley Lea Conner Kelsey Kathleen Marco Jarrett Cothron Joshua Cox Makayla Cox Sierra Cox Cameron Crater Daniel Creson Charles Dale Cooper Cornejo-Martinez Carmen Daniels Addison Davis Ashton Davis Brian Davis Caden Davis Joseph Davis Conner Deese Dante Dejesus Katryna Devroude Samantha Krystal Dugan Loretta Edwards Cameron Effler Bailey Elliott Maalik Elliott Matthew Cole England Cheyenne Esque Dominguez Emerson Charles Faurote Callie Fender Damon Fender Kenneth Kayleigh Floyd McKenna Foster Sadie
    [Show full text]
  • Football State Championship Single Game Record Book 11 Man.Xlsx
    OSAA State Championship Football Games, 11-Man Single-Game Records see separate record book for 8-man records INDIVIDUAL TEAM OFFENSE OFFENSE MOST YARDS RUSHING MOST POINTS SCORED 357, Andy Taylor, McNary vs. Sheldon, 2001 62, West Linn vs. Central Catholic, 2016 MOST RUSHING ATTEMPTS MOST POINTS, HALF 43, 2 tied 48 (1st), Marist vs. Baker, 2009 MOST RUSHING TOUCHDOWNS MOST POINTS, QUARTER 6, Keanon Lowe, Jesuit vs. Sheldon, 2009 28 (2nd), 2 tied LONGEST RUN HIGHEST COMBINED SCORE 91 (TD), Trevor Tinney, Santiam vs. Kennedy, 2018 99, McNary 51, Beaverton 48, 1997 MOST PASS ATTEMPTS LOWEST COMBINED SCORE 55, Sam Vidlak, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 0, 3 tied MOST PASS COMPLETIONS MOST TOUCHDOWNS 39, Sam Vidlak, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 9, 2 tied BEST COMPLETION PERCENTAGE (MIN. 15 ATT) MOST RUSHING ATTEMPTS 86.1 (31-for-36), Cade Knighton, Central Catholic vs Lake Oswego, 2019 70, Dayton vs. Neah-Kah-Nie, 1985 MOST YARDS PASSING MOST RUSHING YARDS 479, Sam Vidlak, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 489, Vale vs. Harrisburg, 2014 LONGEST PASS MOST RUSHING TOUCHDOWNS 98 (TD), Dalton Reimers to Kody Nelson, Grant Union vs. Regis, 2013 7, 3 tied MOST PASSING TOUCHDOWNS MOST PASS ATTEMPTS 6, Taylor Barton, Beaverton vs. McNary, 1997 55, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 MOST INTERCEPTIONS THROWN MOST PASS COMPLETIONS 7 (on 18 att.), Lee, Churchill vs. Corvallis, 1979 39, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 MOST RECEPTIONS MOST PASSING YARDS 18, Jeremiah Noga, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 479, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 MOST RECEIVING YARDS MOST PASSING TOUCHDOWNS 270, Jeremiah Noga, Hidden Valley vs Santiam Christian, 2019 7, Beaverton vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Group Sheets Surname Index
    PASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FAMILY GROUP SHEETS SURNAME INDEX This collection of 660 folders contains over 50,000 family group sheets of families that resided in Passaic and Bergen Counties. These sheets were prepared by volunteers using the Societies various collections of church, ceme tery and bible records as well as city directo ries, county history books, newspaper abstracts and the Mattie Bowman manuscript collection. Example of a typical Family Group Sheet from the collection. PASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FAMILY GROUP SHEETS — SURNAME INDEX A Aldous Anderson Arndt Aartse Aldrich Anderton Arnot Abbott Alenson Andolina Aronsohn Abeel Alesbrook Andreasen Arquhart Abel Alesso Andrews Arrayo Aber Alexander Andriesse (see Anderson) Arrowsmith Abers Alexandra Andruss Arthur Abildgaard Alfano Angell Arthurs Abraham Alje (see Alyea) Anger Aruesman Abrams Aljea (see Alyea) Angland Asbell Abrash Alji (see Alyea) Angle Ash Ack Allabough Anglehart Ashbee Acker Allee Anglin Ashbey Ackerman Allen Angotti Ashe Ackerson Allenan Angus Ashfield Ackert Aller Annan Ashley Acton Allerman Anners Ashman Adair Allibone Anness Ashton Adams Alliegro Annin Ashworth Adamson Allington Anson Asper Adcroft Alliot Anthony Aspinwall Addy Allison Anton Astin Adelman Allman Antoniou Astley Adolf Allmen Apel Astwood Adrian Allyton Appel Atchison Aesben Almgren Apple Ateroft Agar Almond Applebee Atha Ager Alois Applegate Atherly Agnew Alpart Appleton Atherson Ahnert Alper Apsley Atherton Aiken Alsheimer Arbuthnot Atkins Aikman Alterman Archbold Atkinson Aimone
    [Show full text]
  • THE STUDY of SATURN's RINGS 1 Thesis Presented for the Degree Of
    1 THE STUDY OF SATURN'S RINGS 1610-1675, Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Field of History of Science by Albert Van Haden Department of History of Science and Technology Imperial College of Science and Teohnology University of London May, 1970 2 ABSTRACT Shortly after the publication of his Starry Messenger, Galileo observed the planet Saturn for the first time through a telescope. To his surprise he discovered that the planet does.not exhibit a single disc, as all other planets do, but rather a central disc flanked by two smaller ones. In the following years, Galileo found that Sa- turn sometimes also appears without these lateral discs, and at other times with handle-like appendages istead of round discs. These ap- pearances posed a great problem to scientists, and this problem was not solved until 1656, while the solution was not fully accepted until about 1670. This thesis traces the problem of Saturn, from its initial form- ulation, through the period of gathering information, to the final stage in which theories were proposed, ending with the acceptance of one of these theories: the ring-theory of Christiaan Huygens. Although the improvement of the telescope had great bearing on the problem of Saturn, and is dealt with to some extent, many other factors were in- volved in the solution of the problem. It was as much a perceptual problem as a technical problem of telescopes, and the mental processes that led Huygens to its solution were symptomatic of the state of science in the 1650's and would have been out of place and perhaps impossible before Descartes.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology of Space Exploration Psychology of About the Book Douglas A
    About the Editor Contemporary Research in Historical Perspective Psychology of Space Exploration Psychology of About the Book Douglas A. Vakoch is a professor in the Department As we stand poised on the verge of a new era of of Clinical Psychology at the California Institute of spaceflight, we must rethink every element, including Integral Studies, as well as the director of Interstellar Space Exploration the human dimension. This book explores some of the Message Composition at the SETI Institute. Dr. Vakoch Contemporary Research in Historical Perspective contributions of psychology to yesterday’s great space is a licensed psychologist in the state of California, and Edited by Douglas A. Vakoch race, today’s orbiter and International Space Station mis- his psychological research, clinical, and teaching interests sions, and tomorrow’s journeys beyond Earth’s orbit. include topics in psychotherapy, ecopsychology, and meth- Early missions into space were typically brief, and crews odologies of psychological research. As a corresponding were small, often drawn from a single nation. As an member of the International Academy of Astronautics, intensely competitive space race has given way to inter- Dr. Vakoch chairs that organization’s Study Groups on national cooperation over the decades, the challenges of Interstellar Message Construction and Active SETI. communicating across cultural boundaries and dealing Through his membership in the International Institute with interpersonal conflicts have become increasingly of Space Law, he examines
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • Lick Observatory Records: Photographs UA.036.Ser.07
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81z4932 Online items available Lick Observatory Records: Photographs UA.036.Ser.07 Kate Dundon, Alix Norton, Maureen Carey, Christine Turk, Alex Moore University of California, Santa Cruz 2016 1156 High Street Santa Cruz 95064 [email protected] URL: http://guides.library.ucsc.edu/speccoll Lick Observatory Records: UA.036.Ser.07 1 Photographs UA.036.Ser.07 Contributing Institution: University of California, Santa Cruz Title: Lick Observatory Records: Photographs Creator: Lick Observatory Identifier/Call Number: UA.036.Ser.07 Physical Description: 101.62 Linear Feet127 boxes Date (inclusive): circa 1870-2002 Language of Material: English . https://n2t.net/ark:/38305/f19c6wg4 Conditions Governing Access Collection is open for research. Conditions Governing Use Property rights for this collection reside with the University of California. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. The publication or use of any work protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use for research or educational purposes requires written permission from the copyright owner. Responsibility for obtaining permissions, and for any use rests exclusively with the user. Preferred Citation Lick Observatory Records: Photographs. UA36 Ser.7. Special Collections and Archives, University Library, University of California, Santa Cruz. Alternative Format Available Images from this collection are available through UCSC Library Digital Collections. Historical note These photographs were produced or collected by Lick observatory staff and faculty, as well as UCSC Library personnel. Many of the early photographs of the major instruments and Observatory buildings were taken by Henry E. Matthews, who served as secretary to the Lick Trust during the planning and construction of the Observatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Lunar Crater Ejecta Deposits Using Radar Data from the Mini-Rf Instrument on Lro
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2380.pdf CHARACTERIZATION OF LUNAR CRATER EJECTA DEPOSITS USING RADAR DATA FROM THE MINI-RF INSTRUMENT ON LRO. G.W. Patterson, J.T.S. Cahill, and D.B.J. Bussey. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD ([email protected]). Introduction: Impact cratering is the dominant formulation the key inputs are the degree of weathering process on the surface of the Moon and a polarization, m, 2 2 2 1/2 primary means of distributing material on the lunar m = (S2 +S3 +S4 ) /S1 surface [1]. Radar data provide unique information on and the degree of circularity, χ, both the horizontal and vertical distribution of impact sin2χ = − S4/mS1. deposits [2]. The Miniature Radio Frequency (Mini- The m−chi decomposition is expressed through a RF) instrument flown on NASAs Lunar Reconnais- color-coded image with, sance Orbiter (LRO) is a Synthetic Aperture Radar R = [m S1 (1 + sin2χ)/2] (SAR) with an innovative hybrid dual-polarimetric G = [S1 (1 – m)] architecture that transmits a circularly polarized signal, B = [mS1 (1 – sin2χ)/2] and receives orthogonal linear polarizations and their where R represents the double-bounce component, G relative phase [3]. The four Stokes parameters that represents the random-polarized (volume scattering) characterize the observed backscattered EM field are component, and the B represents the single-bounce calculated from the received data. These parameters component of backscatter in an observed scene. can be used to produce a variety of derived products Analysis (Byrgius A): Byrgius A is a 19 km di- that provide unique information on the radar scattering ameter Copernican crater located in the lunar highlands properties of a surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Powell Bill Streets Listing FY2012
    Powell Bill Streets Listing FY2012 This report is a listing of all streets and street segments that the City of Charlotte, North Carolina had under municipal maintenance for fiscal year 2012 (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012). TOTAL MILES OF CITY MAINTAINED STREETS FOR FY2012: 2,434.64 Contact information is as follows: David Snider, PLS City Survey Manager City of Charlotte Engineering Property Management Real Estate Division Survey/Mapping/GIS Section 600 East 4th Street Charlotte, NC 28202 704-336-3875 [email protected] Monday - Friday 7am to 4pm City of Charlotte Powell Bill Report FY2012 Street Name Miles Street Name Miles W 10TH ST 0.41 E 28TH ST 0.13 E 10TH ST 0.18 W 28TH ST 0.69 E 10TH ST 0.47 E 28TH ST 0.17 E 10TH ST 0.08 W 29TH ST 0.11 W 11TH ST 0.08 W 2ND ST 0.21 E 11TH ST 0.67 W 30TH ST 0.28 W 11TH ST 0.09 W 31ST ST 0.17 E 12TH ST 0.75 W 32ND ST 0.42 W 12TH ST 0.10 E 32ND ST 0.11 W 12TH ST 0.34 E 33RD ST 0.11 W 12th St 0.05 E 34TH ST 0.21 E 13TH ST 0.14 E 34TH ST 0.23 E 13TH ST 0.06 E 34TH ST 0.05 E 15TH ST 0.21 E 35TH ST 1.10 W 15TH ST 0.07 E 36TH ST 1.05 E 15TH ST 0.32 E 37TH ST 0.29 E 16TH ST 0.30 E 3RD ST 0.65 E 16TH ST 0.20 W 3RD ST 0.39 E 16TH ST 0.27 W 4TH ST 0.50 E 17TH ST 0.39 E 4TH ST 0.70 E 17TH ST 0.15 E 4TH ST 0.60 E 18TH ST 0.62 W 4TH ST 0.07 E 19TH ST 0.09 W 4TH ST 0.21 E 19TH ST 0.35 W 4TH EXTENSION 0.86 W 1ST ST 0.25 W 5TH ST 0.60 E 1ST ST 0.04 W 5TH ST 0.40 W 1ST ST 0.12 E 5TH ST 0.66 E 20TH ST 0.30 W 5TH ST 0.32 E 20TH ST 0.04 E 5TH ST 0.08 E 21ST ST 0.17 E 5TH ST 1.07 E 22ND ST 0.18 W 6TH ST 0.06 E
    [Show full text]
  • SOLAR ECLIPSE NEWSLETTER SOLAR ECLIPSE October 2003 NEWSLETTER
    Volume 8, Issue 10 SOLAR ECLIPSE NEWSLETTER SOLAR ECLIPSE October 2003 NEWSLETTER The sole Newsletter dedicated to Solar Eclipses INDEX · 2 SECalendar for October Dear All, · 8 Correctie op SE-calender for september Autumn started in the meanwhile. Summer is past. We are getting closer · 8 2nd october secalendar to the end of the year. But of course first the total solar eclipse of 23 No- · 9 Index SENL September · 9 Astronomy Books vember on the South Pole. Quite a few organised tours are having or a · 10 Delta T plane or a boat to the path. Hopefully they all will see the event success- · 10 Subject line from ful. Please send in your accounts and pictures. The SENL will publish. SearchDatabase.com As for Jo and myself, we will not go this time. Financial it is a bit too · 10 Analog or video capture much. Derryl Barr, our good friend wrote: “Only one thing is missing for Laptop from this eclipse: Patrick Poitevin. Is it really an "eclipse" if Patrick isn't · 10 Babcock somewhere within the shadow's path? Perhaps we should call it an Eclise · 10 Delta T September · 11 Electronic imaging eye- (obviously the "P" is missing).” piece · 13 Beating the Black Drop Fred Espenak and Pat Totten visited our new home in Tissington · 14 Photographs of Eclipses (Derbyshire, UK). Although it was a rather short visit, we enjoyed the on Mars time together. We made some plans for the partial eclipse of 14 October · 15 TSE-remote camera con- next year. Sunset eclipse in Hawaii … trol · 17 Thanks · 18 Travelling Birds Movie In the meanwhile the registrations for the International Solar Eclipse Con- · 18 The Moon ference SEC2004 started.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense State of Hawaii Department Of
    ARTHUR J. LOGAN DAVID Y. IGE MAJOR GENERAL ADJUTANT GENERAL GOVERNOR KENNETH S. HARA BRIGADIER GENERAL DEPUTY ADJUTANT GENERAL STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL 3949 DIAMOND HEAD ROAD HONOLULU, HAWAII 96816-4495 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAWAII EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY TESTIMONY ON HOUSE BILL 1180 HD1, RELATING TO NATURAL DISASTERS Before the Senate Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY, INTERGOVERNMENTAL, AND MILITARY AFFAIRS by THOMAS L. TRAVIS Administrator, Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HI-EMA) Aloha Chair Nishihara and Vice-Chair Wakai, and Members of the Committee: The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HI-EMA) supports House Bill 1180 HD1. House Bill 1180 HD1 Appropriates funds for disaster relief, recovery, mitigation, and remediation activities for the county of Hawai‘i. The unprecedented volcanic eruptions on the island of Hawaii from May 3, 2018 to August 14, 2018 destroyed hundreds of homes, communities, businesses, farms, schools, cultural sites, water systems, electrical grid, and roadways. HI-EMA deployed several personnel to assist the Hawaii County during the Kilauea eruption and continues to provide support to the long-term recovery and hazard mitigation efforts. Note: My comments represent HI-EMA concerns at the state emergency management level only. I would defer to the separate comment/testimonies of the county emergency management agencies, as they would be the jurisdictions impacted by this legislation at the local level. Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony on House Bill 1180 HD1. Thomas L. Travis: [email protected]; 808-733-4300 DAVID Y. IGE PHYLLIS SHIMABUKURO-GEISER Governor Chairperson, Board of Agriculture JOSH GREEN GLENN K.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth and Space Science. a Guide for Secondary Teachers. INSTITUTION Pennsylvania State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 094 956 SE 016 611 AUTHOR Bolles, William H.; And Others TITLE Earth and Space Science. A Guide for Secondary Teachers. INSTITUTION Pennsylvania State Dept. of Education, Harrisburg. Bureau of Curriculum Services. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 200p. EDRS PRICE MF-$O.75 HC-$9.00 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Education; *Astronomy; *Curriculum Guides; *Earth Science; Geology; Laboratory Experiments; Oceanology; Science Activities; Science Education; *Secondary School Science IDENTIFIERS Pennsylvania ABSTRACT Designed for use in Pennsylvania secondary school science classes, this guide is intended to provide fundamental information in each of the various disciplines of the earth sciences. Some of the material contained in the guide is intended as background material for teachers. Five units are presented: The Earth, The Oceans, The Space Environment, The Atmosphere, and The Exploration of Space. The course is organized so that students proceed from the familiar, everyday world to the atmosphere and the space environment. Teaching geology in the fall takes advantage of weather conditions which permit field study. The purpose of the Earth and Space Science course is to encourage student behaviors which will be indicative of a broad understanding of man1s physical environment of earth and space as well as an awareness of the consequences which could result from changes which man may effect.(PEB) BEST COPY AVAILABLE U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF 6 Fe elz+C EDUCATION Try,' DOCUMENT FIRSBEEN REPRO
    [Show full text]