Railnews High Speed 2 (Special Report)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Railnews High Speed 2 (Special Report) July 2008 SPECIAL REPORT What future for High Speed in Britain? BRITAIN’S rail system is running out of modernisation of the West Coast Main Line will capacity. Demand will exceed the network’s have created extra capacity on the route— capability within 20 years—possibly within 10 including the four-tracking now under way in years—according to all the latest forecasts. And Staffordshire—but Parliament’s Public Accounts these do not take into account higher demand if Committee has warned that the modernised route motoring costs continue to remain rise. could be at full capacity again from as early as Contrary to many earlier reports, neither the 2015. government’s 2007 White Paper on the next 30 The government agrees that in future it would years of the rail system nor Sir Rod Eddington’s be better to build new lines rather than upgrade report in December 2006 on Britain’s transport existing ones. infrastructure ruled out the development of a new “The clear view of railway professionals with north-south high-speed rail line. experience of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link and Although the government dropped West Coast Main Line projects is that the consideration of a MAGLEV (magnetic disadvantages of undertaking major new levitation) route—on the grounds that it could construction work alongside a working railway cost around £60 billion—the 2007 White Paper outweigh the advantages. … For this reason the made clear there was a need to start planning Government believes that any future planning ahead of the next ‘high level output should focus on new line options,” said the specification’ (HLOS) in 2012 for the possibility railway White Paper. that demand for rail services accelerates. Meanwhile—encouraged by the industry lobby And the White Paper acknowledged that one of group The Railway Forum—Jim Steer, the the first areas where extra capacity may be strategy director of the former Strategic Rail needed is along the London–Birmingham– Authority, set up an organisation called Manchester corridor. Greengauge 21 to argue the case for a new high- When it is completed at the end of 2008, the speed line. What next? A new route, High Speed 2, comprising “a broad organisations. Its work will has been put forward by the coalition of interests”— be coordinated with a New pressure group Greengauge among them, regional Lines Programme, also 21, which is to set up a development agencies, city announced by Network Rail. Public Interest Group councils and rail industry ________________________________________________________________________ Network Rail boosts British high-speed rail proposals • MPs’ report says ‘capacity problem on the West Coast Main Line is already grave’ PLANS to extend high-speed train services from St Pancras International to the Midlands and North — High Speed 2 — have been boosted by Network Rail, which has set up a study to see if new lines can be justified. The results should be known within a year. Richard Eccles, Network Rail’s Head of Route come from ‘highway decongestion’ resulting Planning, said a ‘new lines programme’ would from the big switch of motorists to high-speed be looking at the East Coast Main Line, Midland trains. Main Line, West Coast Main Line, Chiltern Line and Western Main Line corridors. MPs want early decision The team had been set up by Network Rail to In its latest report, Parliament’s Transport examine what should be done when network Select Committee said the government “needs to capacity runs out in the next 10 – 20 years, he commit to making a decision by 2010 at the told a Railway Forum conference in latest.” Birmingham. The committee’s report — much of it prepared “Our expectation is that the best value for before the death of its former chairman, money will be a high-speed line,” Richard Gwyneth Dunwoody — said “the capacity Eccles said. problem on the West Coast Main Line is already An influential committee of MPs has also grave.” called on the government to make a decision on a The MPs added: “We were therefore concerned new line—at least as far as Birmingham—by that the Department [for Transport] has no time- 2010. frame for a decision on a high speed link, at least And a report for Birmingham City Council has as far as Birmingham, the stretch of the line with forecast that a new 300km/h (186 mph) line the most pressing problems.” would boost the West Midlands’ economy by Greengauge 21, the organisation set up by Jim over £6 billion. Steer—who was strategy director at the former This is the first-ever detailed estimate of Strategic Rail Authority—has proposed building economic benefits that high-speed rail services the first stage of a new high-speed line to the would bring to a British city. north. Until now, calls for new high-speed lines have The plan has been welcomed and supported by had to be based on the experience of Lille, the Railway Forum, as well as by Eurostar, northern France, after completion of new lines which saw a 21 per cent rise in passenger from Paris to Brussels and London. numbers — and a 25 per cent increase in revenue The Birmingham study forecasts that by — in the first quarter of 2008, following the building High Speed 2 from the terminus of High opening of High Speed 1 last November. Speed 1 at St Pancras—and with a spur line into The ‘candidate route’ suggested by Heathrow airport—half of all road trips between Greengauge 21 would run from St Pancras Birmingham, London and Heathrow would towards west London, with a spur line to switch to rail. Heathrow, then the main route would follow the David Bull, Birmingham’s Assistant Director Chiltern line northwards, passing under High (Development Strategy), said that as well as Wycombe and the Chilterns in a tunnel. frequent trains over the new line to London and It would then carry trains — at almost three Heathrow, there would be two international times the maximum legal driving speed — services each hour to destinations such as Paris, alongside the M40 motorway past Banbury and Brussels and Amsterdam. Warwick before following the M42 motorway Over five million passenger trips a year are towards Tamworth. There it would join the West forecast, said Mr Bull — 3.9 million from Coast Main Line where it is currently being Birmingham, 0.8 million from Birmingham expanded from two to four tracks. International Airport and 0.3 million from A ‘branch line’ would run into Birmingham Heathrow. city centre from Dorridge, using the former Total economic benefits are expected to be over £6 billion, of which £1 billion alone would 3 Great Western relief lines into Moor Street Journeys between London and the north would station. all be reduced by at least 30 minutes and A new station would be built near Birmingham capacity would also be freed up on the ‘classic’ International Airport and the National Exhibition route via Milton Keynes and Rugby for more Centre where HS2 crosses the Coventry- commuter, regional passenger and freight Birmingham route, linked to the existing services. Birmingham International station. Journeys on HS2 between London and Based on High Speed 1 the new route— Birmingham would be cut to less than one hour, totalling 150 miles to Birmingham and and the time between Heathrow and Birmingham Tamworth—would cost £11 billion, including a would be only about 45 minutes. 66 per cent overspending allowance, as required Paris and Brussels would both be within three by the Treasury. hours of Birmingham. * Growth will soon outstrip network capacity BRITAIN’S rail network is replacement of diesel HSTs), demand to the Midlands and fast filling up, and there are and extra services on both the North, including creating growing concerns about its East Coast and Midland Main economic regeneration in ability to cope with future Lines,” he said. Birmingham and the West demand. Already, long-distance Midlands region. Richard Eccles, Head of passenger-kilometres had Shorter journey times Route Planning at Network grown 65 per cent since 1994 would also make Birmingham Rail, told the Railway Forum said Mr Hayes. International Airport closer that the government’s aim And in only the past three to London than Stansted, he was to carry double years numbers on the West added. passenger and freight Coast route had increased by Atkins’ Michael Hayes said volumes on the present 25 per cent following half of the expected network. “That is a huge introduction of the initial economic benefits from a increase,” he said. “Can you Virgin Pendolino timetable. high-speed line would come imagine Liverpool Street Jim Steer, of Greengauge from journey time reductions. station handling twice as 21—which has proposed The other half would come many people as it does construction of a new high- from relieving pressure on today? It just won’t work.” speed line with a first stage existing routes. Mr Eccles said current north of London to Richard Eccles, of Network forecasts suggested that Birmingham and to the West Rail, said the business case— demand would exceed Coast Main Line near both for building a new line capacity by 2026, only 18 Tamworth—said the and providing capacity on the years away. advantages of the new high- existing infrastructure— But according to Michael frequency Pendolino service should be “compelling”. Hayes, of consultants W S “are not sustainable because For example, Milton Atkins, capacity might be of capacity constraints.” Keynes commuters should reached as soon as 2016. Mr Steer added: “The benefit from a new high- Among long-distance Pendolino service is very speed line because it would routes, the worst problems predictably going to be the free up capacity for were expected to arise south victim of its own success.” additional trains, he pointed of Peterborough on the East But a new high-speed line out.
Recommended publications
  • Major New Development Scheme in Bicester • Within 2 Miles
    Major new development scheme in Bicester Within 2 miles of Junction 9 of the London to Birmingham M40 motorway Outline planning consent for up to 520,000 sq ft of Distribution / Manufacturing/ Industrial /R & D and offices Buildings from 80,000 sq ft – 250,000 sq ft FOR SALE / TO LET WHITE COMMERCIAL SURVEYORS LTD Charter Court, 49 Castle Street Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX16 5NU 01295 271000 whitecommercial.co.uk LOCATION LEGAL COSTS Strategically located off Junction 9 of the M40, Bicester Each party is to be responsible for their own costs in this is a rapidly expanding Oxfordshire town that is transaction. Misrepresentation Act scheduled for substantial growth over the coming years. Bicester is readily accessed from both the M40 and A34 VIEWING & FURTHER INFORMATION and also has excellent links to Aylesbury, Thame and Viewing strictly by prior appointment with the joint agents: Buckingham. The M1 at Northampton can also be White Commercial Surveyors Ltd readily accessed via the M40/A43. Link 9 Bicester sits Chris White BSc, MRICS, MCI (Arb) approximately 5 miles from Junction 9 of the M40 and is [email protected] Tel: 01295 271000 readily accessed via the A41 and A4421 perimeter road. DESCRIPTION Colliers International LINK 9 Bicester provides an exciting new design and James Haestier / Len Rosso 020 7344 6610 / 020 7487 1765 build development opportunity. It is the only immediately [email protected] deliverable site in Bicester and the first large scheme in [email protected] the town for over 15 years. The site totals approximately 35.70 acres (14.45 hectares) and has outline planning VSL & Partners Tom Barton consent from Cherwell District Council (15/01012/OUT) 01865 848 488 for 520,000 sq ft (48,308 sq m) of employment floor [email protected] space (Class B1c, B2, B8 and ancillary B1a uses).
    [Show full text]
  • East West Rail Western Section Phase 2
    EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 CONSULTATION INFORMATION DOCUMENT JUNE 2017 Document Reference 133735-PBR-REP-EEN-000026 Author Network Rail Date June 2017 Date of revision and June 2017 revision number 2.0 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Consultation Information Document TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Purpose of this consultation ...................................................................... 2 2.2 Structure of this consultation ..................................................................... 2 3. EAST WEST RAIL .............................................................................................. 4 3.1 Background ............................................................................................... 4 3.2 EWR Western Section ............................................................................... 5 4. EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 .......................................... 8 4.1 Benefits ..................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Location ..................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Consenting considerations ...................................................................... 11 4.4 Interface with the High Speed
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquarian & Modern
    Blackwell’s Rare Books Blackwell’S rare books ANTIQUARIAN & MODERN Blackwell’s Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/ rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell’s bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell’s online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations. We have something for everyone. Select from our subject areas, reviews, highlights, promotions and more. Orders and correspondence should in every case be sent to our Broad Street address (all books subject to prior sale).
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Belfry Directions
    The Oxford Belfry Directions From M40 North (Bicester, Birmingham, Manchester, M42, M6) posted for A418 Aylesbury / Services. Follow the A418 through two roundabouts (over M40, Junction 8 / 8A). After approximately ½ mile Exit M40 at Oxford Service (Junction 8A). At the roundabout take the turn right onto A40 (signposted Milton Common, Tetsworth). The hotel 3rd exit onto A418 (signposted Aylesbury). After approximately 1 is situated 1 ½ miles along on the left-hand side. mile, turn right onto the A40 (signposted Milton Common, Tetsworth). The hotel is situated 1 ½ miles along on the left-hand side. From M1 (Northampton, Milton Keynes / Aylesbury) From M40 South (London, High Wycombe) Exit M1 Junction 15a, at follow the A43 through Towcester to M40 South junction 10 (signposted Oxford). Exit M40 at Oxford Service Exit M40 at Junction 7. At the T-junction turn right onto the A329 (Junction 8A). At the roundabout take the 3rd exit onto A418 (signposted Thame, Milton Common). Branch left, then merge onto (signposted Aylesbury). After approximately 1 mile, turn right onto the the A40 (signposted Oxford, Tiddington). The hotel is situated 200 A40 (signposted Milton Common, Tetsworth). The hotel is situated 1 metres along on the right-hand side. ½ miles along on the left-hand side. From Reading From M4 (Swindon, Newbury) Follow A4074 to Wallingford. At Shillingford, take A329 to Thame. Exit M4 at Junction 13. Follow A34 (signposted Oxford). Follow the Immediately after crossing over the M40 motorway, branch left and A4074 (signposted Ring Road, London), follow the A4142 merge onto the A40 (signposted Oxford, Tiddington). The hotel is (signposted London, High Wycombe), then follow the A40 until sign- situated 200 metres along on the right-hand side.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Strategy Our Approach
    Litter Strategy Our approach Introduction If people didn’t drop litter, it wouldn’t have to The Department for Environment, Food and Rural be picked up. Litter on our network is not only Affairs (Defra) Code of Practice 2006 on litter and unsightly, it’s hazardous too. It can obstruct refuse (available at www.defra.gov.uk) defines litter: drivers and is a public health concern for our road workers during the clearing process, and that ‘to include materials often associated with time and money could be better spent on other smoking, eating and drinking, that are priorities. As well as economic impacts it also improperly discarded and left by members of has wider, adverse environmental concerns. the public; or spilt during business operations as well as waste management operations.’ We remain committed to delivering a high level of service for customers and communities We developed this strategy in consultation educating and informing those who drop litter with external partners such as government on our network of the consequences as we play departments, local authorities, suppliers and our part in reducing this cost to the public. other related associations to present a focused, holistic, approach to managing litter on the Our aspiration is that this strategy will help network. The strategy presents our vision, and it change the behaviours of those who drop is an approach we share openly and publicly. litter and we will continue to work with our stakeholders, suppliers and staff to achieve this. Purpose The purpose of this litter strategy is to outline how Background we can better manage litter on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability
    HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd February 2011 HS2 London to the West Midlands: Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd 55 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU T 0207 944 4908 [email protected] Principal author Nick Giesler Key contributors Andrew Bryant, Andrew Mayes, Amanda Pownall, Sheenagh Mann, Sam Turner, Tony Selwyn, Yaser Ali Technical contributors Carbon and climate Matt Ireland, Tony Selwyn, Andrew Bryant, Water Environment Landscape & townscape Gillespies, Nick Giesler Cultural heritage Cotswold Archaeology Biodiversity Ecology Consultancy Ltd, Nick Giesler Water and flood risk Water Environment, Andrew Bryant Air quality John Rowland, Enan Keogh Noise and vibration John Fisk, Sasha Villa, Mark Southwood, Rob Adnitt Community integrity and accessibility Vicky Ward, Sheenagh Mann Equality Vicky Ward, Future Inclusion Health and well-being Institute for Occupational Medicine, Sheenagh Mann Socio-economics Derval Cummings, Stuart McCully, Colin Buchanan (consultants) Resources and consumption Andrew Mayes, Tony Selwyn, Sam Turner, Andrew Bryant Reviewers Mark Southwood, Stuart McCully, Roger Cooper This report was commissioned by, and prepared for HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport (DfT) by Booz & Co. (UK) Ltd (www.booz.com) and Temple Group Ltd (www.templegroup.co.uk) ('The Consultant'). The findings and conclusions set forth in this report represent the best professional judgment of the Consultant based on information made available to it. The Consultant has relied on, and not independently verified, data provided to it by such sources and on secondary sources of information cited in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to New College, Oxford
    Directions to New College By rail Trains run at least once an hour between Oxford and London, and twice an hour during peak times. Oxford is also on the main cross-country routes. For details of times and fares, telephone 08457 484950 (24 hours) or visit www.rail.co.uk. By coach/bus Two companies run frequent buses, 24 hours a day, between London (Victoria Bus Station) and Oxford; The Oxford Bus Company (01865 785400), and Oxford Tube (01865 772250). There are also direct and regular services to Oxford from Heathrow and Gatwick airports operated by the Oxford Bus Company (01865 785400). Coach services from other parts of the country are available with National Express. Telephone 08705 808080 or visit www.nationalexpress.com Taxis Courtesy Cars: 01865 874787 or 873497 ABC Taxis: 01865 770077 or 775577 By car Parking is difficult in Oxford, so we encourage conference organisers to ask their delegates to travel to Oxford by rail or coach. On-street parking is severely restricted in the City Centre and in the roads surrounding the College. We encourage those wishing to bring cars to ‘park-and-ride’. From London and the East Leave the M40 motorway at Junction 8 sign posted Oxford A40. Continue for approximately 5 miles; the A40 meets the Green Road roundabout, go straight across, following signs for Headington and the City Centre; continue straight on for 2 miles through Headington until you reach another roundabout - The Plain - and take the last exit. Cross Magdalen Bridge, and at the traffic lights turn right into Longwall Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetsworth Parish Character Assessment
    TETSWORTH PARISH CHARACTER ASSESSMENT Evidence Report for Tetsworth Neighbourhood Plan January 2020 Contents Executive Summary Introduction Overview of the Tetsworth Neighbourhood Area Historic Development of Tetsworth Settlement Character Areas Overview Settlement Character Area 1 – Village Historic Core Settlement Character Area 2 – Marsh End/High Street West Settlement Character Area 3 – Village Green Settlement Character Area 4 – Swan Gardens Estate Settlement Character Area 5 – The Grange Estate Settlement Character Area 6 – High Street East Summary Heritage and Landmark Value Assessments Landscape Character Overview Countryside Character Sector 1 – Land North of Tetsworth Countryside Character Sector 2 – Land East of Tetsworth Countryside Character Sector 3 – Land South-East of Tetsworth between M40 and A40 Countryside Character Sector 4 – Land to the South of the M40 Countryside Character Sector 5 – Land North-West of Tetsworth between M40 and A40 Summary Environmental Value Assessment Executive Summary The purpose of this Settlement and Landscape Character Assessment of the Parish of Tetsworth is to establish a firm evidence base to support the preparation of the Tetsworth Neighbourhood Plan and underpin the policies within it. The report traces the evolution of the Tetsworth settlement from its earliest days, documents the key features of the village as it is today and describes its surrounding countryside. It also paints a more detailed picture of the character of six distinct areas which make up the village settlement and the five surrounding countryside sectors which are largely defined by the roads passing through the Parish. The Tetsworth settlement was established at a historically important crossroads in the centre of a rural parish and remains its sole settlement, well separated from neighbouring villages.
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the Ex Post Evaluation of Trunk Road Schemes Be Enhanced?
    How should the ex post evaluation of trunk road schemes be enhanced? Report prepared for Department for Transport June 2005 Final report Oxera i Draft for Comment: Strictly Confidential Oxera Consulting Ltd is registered in England No. 2589629. Registered office at Blue Boar Court, Alfred Street, Oxford OX1 4EH, UK. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented herein, the Company accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its contents. Oxera Consulting Ltd is not licensed in the conduct of investment business as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Anyone considering a specific investment should consult their own broker or other investment adviser. The Company accepts no liability for any specific investment decision, which must be at the investor’s own risk. © Oxera, 2005. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part may be used or reproduced without permission. Executive summary This report considers the feasibility of enhancing the way in which the Highways Agency and the Department for Transport (DfT) evaluate the impacts of major road schemes. It concludes that it would be possible and worthwhile to enhance existing approaches, and suggests a way forward. The study was conducted by Oxera, in conjunction with Mott MacDonald, Social Research Associates (Sra), the Tavistock Institute and the Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford (TSU). The work was overseen by a Steering Group comprising representatives from the Highways Agency and the DfT.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimised Alternative
    Further written evidence from 51M (HSR 109B) This supplementary evidence is submitted to update the Committee on issues related to the “Optimised Alternative”, as described in Chapter 1 of our main submission, and to respond to the supplementary evidence submitted to the Committee by DfT and HS2 Ltd this week. Given the time constraints we have provided a detailed response on the Optimised Alternative and overview responses on a number of the issues raised in the DfT and HS2 Ltd supplementary evidence. We may provide a more detailed response to the Committee on certain items of the supplementary evidence in the near future. Optimised Alternative Neither DfT nor HS2 Ltd has made any attempt to engage with us directly on our proposed approach or the Optimised Alternative. DfT acknowledge that they have not carried out a full analysis of 51m’s alternative, despite its higher capacity and its lower capital costs than Atkins’ Rail Package 2. This is somewhat surprising since it has now been in the public domain for some 3 months. Below we respond to the statements made by DfT and HS2 Ltd in their supplementary evidence and the “Yes to High Speed Rail” campaign paper from William Barter, which purports to analyse the Optimised Alternative. • Both the DfT’s supplementary evidence and the William Barter paper assert that much of the 215% additional capacity set out in the Optimised Alternative doesn’t count, as any calculation of capacity increases should be based on the capacity after completion of the existing project to lengthen some of the current 52 Pendolino trains from 9 to 11 cars.
    [Show full text]