DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Powers Index Scores by Country, in Alphabetical Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Powers Index Scores by Country, in Alphabetical Order Parliamentary Powers Index Scores by Country, in Alphabetical Order Please cite M. Steven Fish and Matthew Kroenig, The Handbook of National Legislatures: A Global Survey (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009) Country PPI National Assembly of Afghanistan 0.38 Assembly of Albania 0.75 Parliament of Algeria 0.25 National Assembly of Angola 0.44 Argentine National Congress 0.50 Armenian National Assembly 0.56 Parliament of Australia 0.63 Austrian Parliament 0.72 Parliament of Azerbaijan 0.44 National Assembly of Bahrain 0.19 Bangladesh Parliament 0.59 National Assembly of Belarus 0.25 Federal Parliament of Belgium 0.75 National Assembly of Benin 0.56 National Assembly of Bhutan 0.22 Bolivian National Congress 0.44 Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.63 National Assembly of Botswana 0.44 National Congress of Brazil 0.56 National Assembly of Bulgaria 0.78 National Assembly of Burkina Faso 0.53 Parliament of Burundi 0.41 National Assembly of Cambodia 0.59 National Assembly of Cameroon 0.25 Parliament of Canada 0.72 National Assembly of the Central African Republic 0.34 National Assembly of Chad 0.22 Congress of Chile 0.56 Chinese National People’s Congress 0.34 Congress of Colombia 0.56 Assembly of Comoros 0.38 Parliament of Congo-Brazzaville (Republic of Congo) 0.38 National Assembly of Congo-Kinshasa (DRC) 0.25 Legislative Assembly of Costa Rica 0.53 National Assembly of Côte d’Ivoire 0.38 Parliament of Croatia 0.78 National Assembly of People’s Power of Cuba 0.28 House of Representatives of Cyprus 0.41 Parliament of the Czech Republic 0.81 Parliament of Denmark 0.78 National Congress of the Dominican Republic 0.41 National Congress of Ecuador 0.53 People’s Assembly of Egypt 0.28 Legislative Assembly of El Salvador 0.59 National Assembly of Eritrea 0.25 Parliament of Estonia 0.75 Parliament of Ethiopia 0.50 Parliament of Fiji 0.63 Parliament of Finland 0.72 Parliament of France 0.56 Parliament of Gabon 0.44 National Assembly of The Gambia 0.31 Parliament of Georgia 0.59 Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany 0.84 Parliament of Ghana 0.47 Parliament of Greece 0.81 Congress of Guatemala 0.50 National Assembly of Guinea 0.31 National People’s Assembly of Guinea-Bissau 0.25 National Assembly of Guyana 0.38 National Assembly of Haiti 0.44 National Congress of Honduras 0.53 National Assembly of Hungary 0.75 Parliament of India 0.63 House of Representatives of Indonesia 0.56 Islamic Consultative Assembly of the Islamic Republic of Iran 0.44 Council of Representatives of Iraq 0.63 Parliament of Ireland 0.66 Parliament of Israel 0.75 Parliament of Italy 0.84 Parliament of Jamaica 0.63 National Diet of Japan 0.66 National Assembly of Jordan 0.22 Parliament of Kazakhstan 0.38 National Assembly of Kenya 0.31 Supreme People’s Assembly of North Korea (DPRK) 0.13 National Assembly of South Korea (ROK) 0.59 National Assembly of Kuwait 0.38 Legislative Assembly of Kyrgyzstan 0.47 National Assembly of Laos 0.28 Parliament of Latvia 0.78 National Assembly of Lebanon 0.50 Parliament of Lesotho 0.53 National Assembly of Liberia 0.44 General People’s Congress of Libya 0.13 Parliament of Lithuania 0.78 Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia 0.81 National Assembly of Madagascar 0.41 National Assembly of Malawi 0.38 Parliament of Malaysia 0.34 National Assembly of Mali 0.34 Parliament of Mauritania 0.31 National Assembly of Mauritius 0.66 Mexican Congress 0.44 Parliament of Moldova 0.75 Great State Assembly of Mongolia 0.84 Parliament of Morocco 0.31 Assembly of Mozambique 0.44 People’s Assembly of Myanmar (Burma) 0.00 National Assembly of Namibia 0.50 Parliament of Nepal 0.44 States-General of the Netherlands 0.78 Parliament of New Zealand 0.69 National Assembly of Nicaragua 0.69 National Assembly of Niger 0.50 National Assembly of Nigeria 0.47 Parliament of Norway 0.72 Council of Oman 0.16 Parliament of Pakistan 0.44 National Assembly of Panama 0.50 National Parliament of Papua New Guinea 0.66 Congress of Paraguay 0.56 Congress of Peru 0.66 Congress of the Philippines 0.56 Parliament of Poland 0.75 Assembly of Portugal 0.63 Consultative Council of Qatar 0.22 Parliament of Romania 0.72 Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation 0.44 Parliament of Rwanda 0.47 Consultative Council of Saudi Arabia 0.09 National Assembly of Senegal 0.44 National Assembly of Serbia 0.69 Parliament of Sierra Leone 0.41 Parliament of Singapore 0.38 National Council of the Slovak Republic 0.72 Parliament of Slovenia 0.75 Transitional Federal Assembly of Somalia 0.00 Parliament of South Africa 0.63 The General Courts of Spain 0.72 Parliament of Sri Lanka 0.50 National Legislature of Sudan 0.22 Parliament of Swaziland 0.25 Parliament of Sweden 0.72 Federal Assembly of Switzerland 0.72 People’s Assembly of Syria 0.31 Legislative Yuan of Taiwan, Republic of China 0.59 Supreme Assembly of Tajikistan 0.31 National Assembly of Tanzania 0.31 National Assembly of Thailand 0.59 National Parliament of Timor-Leste 0.47 National Assembly of Togo 0.38 Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago 0.53 National Parliament of Tunisia 0.28 Turkish Grand National Assembly 0.78 People’s Council of Turkmenistan 0.06 National Assembly of Uganda 0.44 Supreme Council of Ukraine 0.59 Federal National Council of the United Arab Emirates 0.06 Parliament of the United Kingdom 0.78 Congress of the United States of America 0.63 Uruguayan General Assembly 0.66 Supreme Assembly of Uzbekistan 0.28 National Assembly of Venezuela 0.53 National Assembly of Vietnam 0.34 Parliament of Yemen 0.44 National Assembly of Zambia 0.28 Parliament of Zimbabwe 0.31 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report to the Houses of the Oireachtas on Developments in the European Union
    AN ROINN GNÓTHAÍ EACHTRACHA DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Report to the Houses of the Oireachtas on developments in the European Union 1 July 2020 – 31 December 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 BREXIT.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Conclusion of EU-UK Negotiations .................................................................................................. 4 Implementation of Withdrawal Agreement and Protocol .............................................................. 5 Readiness for the end of the Transition Period .............................................................................. 5 MULTIANNUAL FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 7 CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF EUROPE ........................................................................................ 9 COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY (CFSP) .......................................................................... 10 COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (CSDP).......................................................................... 10 CYBERSECURITY ................................................................................................................................. 11 HYBRID THREATS AND DISINFORMATION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 1996 Institutional Crisis in Paraguay
    Democratic Forum The 1996 Institutional Crisis in Paraguay September 1996 Washington, D.C. Secretary General César Gaviria Assistant Secretary General Christopher R. Thomas Executive Coordinator, Unit for the Promotion of Democracy Elizabeth M. Spehar This publication is part of a series of publications of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS). Opinions and statements expressed are not necessarily those of the OAS or its member states, and are entirely the responsibility of the parties expressing them. Democratic Forum The institutional crisis of April 22 to 24, 1996, in Paraguay, from the perspective of the Government, civil society, and the international community Unit for the Promotion of Democracy This report is an edited version of the original transcripts, produced under the technical supervision of Mr. Diego Paz, Senior Specialist of the UPD, and Coordinator of this Forum. Professor Riordan Roett contributed with the summary and comments included in this issue. Design and composition of this publication was done by the Information and Dialogue Section headed by Mr. John Murray of the UPD. Mrs. Betty Robinson and Mrs. Judith Horvath- Rouco helped with the final editing of this report, and JNA Design was responsible for the graphic design. Copyright @ 1997. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this material is authorized; please credit it as Aa publication of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States@. Table of contents Preface..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study Between the Omani and British Legal Systems in Terms of Judicial Independence and Separation of Powers
    ISSN 2411-958X (Print) European Journal of January – April 2020 ISSN 2411-4138 (Online) Interdisciplinary Studies Volume 6, Issue 1 Comparative Study Between the Omani and British Legal Systems in Terms of Judicial Independence and Separation of Powers Rashid H.S. Al Junaibi Brunel University - London Abstract The legal system of Oman is a junction of the locally inherent religious legal norms and foreign influence of the French and British legal systems. The legal documents of the country, such as Constitution Articles 60 and 61, may claim that the judiciary is independent, yet the Omani experience within the executive branch, and its role in legislation, demonstrate that the Middle-Eastern state stands in contrast to the United Kingdom (UK), where the separation of powers (SOP) has been in effect since at least 1701. As is indicative of the common historical theme, considering the powers of the sultan, Oman may be said to be in need of popular participation through the parliamentary branches, for the creation of a regional prosecutorial body, and the enforcement of international judicial independence and conduct resolutions. Oman showed a positive response during the peaceful protests in 2011. Still, Oman may require national conferences to discuss such cases with popular participation. Keywords: comparative study, Omani, British, legal systems, judicial independence, separation of powers The Omani and British Legal Systems in Terms of Judicial Independence and Separation of Powers Chapter One: Introduction Overview of the Research Often, people hear their political regimes claim that their countries are judicially just. However, this may not necessarily be as claimed. In Oman, legal documents, such as the national constitution, reveal how the separation of powers (SOP) is a guiding principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Eudo Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: ICELAND Gudni Th. Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/8 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson and Thorbjörn Björnsson 1 Introduction Historically, Iceland has been among the world’s most homogenous countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit: Citizen Participation in the Legislative Process
    This publication was made possible with financial support from the Government of Canada. About ParlAmericas ParlAmericas is the institution that promotes PARLIAMENTARY DIPLOMACY in the INTER-AMERICAN system ParlAmericas is composed of the 35 NATIONAL LEGISLATURES from North, Central and South America and the Caribbean ParlAmericas facilitates the exchange of parliamentary BEST PRACTICES and promotes COOPERATIVE POLITICAL DIALOGUE ParlAmericas mainstreams GENDER EQUALITY by advocating for women’s political empowerment and the application of a gender lens in legislative work ParlAmericas fosters OPEN PARLIAMENTS by advancing the principles of transparency, accountability, citizen participation, ethics and probity ParlAmericas promotes policies and legislative measures to mitigate and adapt to the effects ofCLIMATE CHANGE ParlAmericas works towards strengthening democracy and governance by accompanying ELECTORAL PROCESSES ParlAmericas is headquartered in OTTAWA, CANADA Table of Contents Toolkit Co-creation Plan 6 Contributors 8 Introduction 9 Objective 9 Using this Toolkit 9 Defining Citizen Participation 10 Importance of Citizen Participation 10 Participation Ladder 11 Overview of Citizen Participation in the Legislative Process 12 Developing a Citizen Participation Strategy 15 Principles of Citizen Participation 16 Resources to Support Citizen Participation 17 Educating Citizens and Promoting Participation 18 Awareness Raising Programs and Campaigns 18 Citizen Participation Offices and Communications Departments 19 Parliamentary Websites
    [Show full text]
  • Protest and State–Society Relations in the Middle East and North Africa
    SIPRI Policy Paper PROTEST AND STATE– 56 SOCIETY RELATIONS IN October 2020 THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA dylan o’driscoll, amal bourhrous, meray maddah and shivan fazil STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Ambassador Jan Eliasson, Chair (Sweden) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Espen Barth Eide (Norway) Jean-Marie Guéhenno (France) Dr Radha Kumar (India) Ambassador Ramtane Lamamra (Algeria) Dr Patricia Lewis (Ireland/United Kingdom) Dr Jessica Tuchman Mathews (United States) DIRECTOR Dan Smith (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 72 Solna, Sweden Telephone: + 46 8 655 9700 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sipri.org Protest and State– Society Relations in the Middle East and North Africa SIPRI Policy Paper No. 56 dylan o’driscoll, amal bourhrous, meray maddah and shivan fazil October 2020 © SIPRI 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of SIPRI or as expressly permitted by law. Contents Preface v Acknowledgements vi Summary vii Abbreviations ix 1. Introduction 1 Figure 1.1. Classification of countries in the Middle East and North Africa by 2 protest intensity 2. State–society relations in the Middle East and North Africa 5 Mass protests 5 Sporadic protests 16 Scarce protests 31 Highly suppressed protests 37 Figure 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • United Arab Emirates (Uae)
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: United Arab Emirates, July 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) July 2007 COUNTRY اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴّﺔ اﻟﻤﺘّﺤﺪة (Formal Name: United Arab Emirates (Al Imarat al Arabiyah al Muttahidah Dubai , أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ (The seven emirates, in order of size, are: Abu Dhabi (Abu Zaby .اﻹﻣﺎرات Al ,ﻋﺠﻤﺎن Ajman , أ مّ اﻟﻘﻴﻮﻳﻦ Umm al Qaywayn , اﻟﺸﺎرﻗﺔ (Sharjah (Ash Shariqah ,دﺑﻲّ (Dubayy) .رأس اﻟﺨﻴﻤﺔ and Ras al Khaymah ,اﻟﻔﺠﻴﺮة Fajayrah Short Form: UAE. اﻣﺮاﺗﻰ .(Term for Citizen(s): Emirati(s أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ .Capital: Abu Dhabi City Major Cities: Al Ayn, capital of the Eastern Region, and Madinat Zayid, capital of the Western Region, are located in Abu Dhabi Emirate, the largest and most populous emirate. Dubai City is located in Dubai Emirate, the second largest emirate. Sharjah City and Khawr Fakkan are the major cities of the third largest emirate—Sharjah. Independence: The United Kingdom announced in 1968 and reaffirmed in 1971 that it would end its treaty relationships with the seven Trucial Coast states, which had been under British protection since 1892. Following the termination of all existing treaties with Britain, on December 2, 1971, six of the seven sheikhdoms formed the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The seventh sheikhdom, Ras al Khaymah, joined the UAE in 1972. Public holidays: Public holidays other than New Year’s Day and UAE National Day are dependent on the Islamic calendar and vary from year to year. For 2007, the holidays are: New Year’s Day (January 1); Muharram, Islamic New Year (January 20); Mouloud, Birth of Muhammad (March 31); Accession of the Ruler of Abu Dhabi—observed only in Abu Dhabi (August 6); Leilat al Meiraj, Ascension of Muhammad (August 10); first day of Ramadan (September 13); Eid al Fitr, end of Ramadan (October 13); UAE National Day (December 2); Eid al Adha, Feast of the Sacrifice (December 20); and Christmas Day (December 25).
    [Show full text]
  • Paraguay: in Brief
    Paraguay: In Brief June S. Beittel Analyst in Latin American Affairs August 31, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44936 Paraguay: In Brief Summary Paraguay is a South American country wedged between Bolivia, Argentina, and Brazil. It is about the size of California but has a population of less than 7 million. The country is known for its rather homogenous culture—a mix of Latin and Guarani influences, with 90% of the population speaking Guarani, a pre-Columbian language, in addition to Spanish. The Paraguayan economy is one of the most agriculturally dependent in the hemisphere and is largely shaped by the country’s production of cattle, soybeans, and other crops. In 2016, Paraguay grew by 4.1%; it is projected to sustain about 4.3% growth in 2017. Since his election in 2013, President Horacio Cartes of the long-dominant Colorado Party (also known as the Asociación Nacional Republicana [ANC]), has moved the country toward a more open economy, deepening private investment and increasing public-private partnerships to promote growth. Despite steady growth, Paraguay has a high degree of inequality and, although poverty levels have declined, rural poverty is severe and widespread. Following Paraguay’s 35-year military dictatorship in the 20th century (1954-1989), many citizens remain cautious about the nation’s democracy and fearful of a return of patronage and corruption. In March 2016, a legislative initiative to allow a referendum to reelect President Cartes (reelection is forbidden by the 1992 constitution) sparked large protests. Paraguayans rioted, and the parliament building in the capital city of Asunción was partially burned.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Extract from Constitution.Pdf
    PART I EXTRACTS FROM THE CONSTITUTION * * * * * PART V THE UNION CHAPTER I.—THE EXECUTIVE The President and Vice-President 52. The President of India.—There shall be a President of India. * * * * * 54. Election of President.—The President shall be elected by the members of an electoral college consisting of— (a) the elected members of both Houses of Parliament; and (b) the elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of the States. 1[Explanation.—In this article and in article 55, "State" includes the National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union territory of 2[Puducherry].] 55. Manner of election of President.—(1) As far as practicable, there shall be uniformity in the scale of representation of the different States at the election of the President. (2) For the purpose of securing such uniformity among the States inter se as well as parity between the States as a whole and the Union, the number of votes which each elected member of Parliament and of the Legislative Assembly of each State is entitled to cast at such election shall be determined in the following manner:— (a) every elected member of the legislative Assembly of a State shall have as many votes as there are multiples of one thousand in the quotient obtained by dividing the population of the State by the total number of the elected members of the Assembly; (b) if, after taking the said multiples of one thousand, the remainder is not less than five hundred, then the vote of each member referred to in sub-clause (a) shall be further increased by one; (c) each elected member of either House of Parliament shall have such number of votes as may be obtained by dividing the total number of votes assigned to the members of the Legislative Assemblies of the States under sub-clauses (a) and (b) by the total number of the elected members of both Houses of Parliament, fractions exceeding one-half being counted as one and other fractions being disregarded.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices
    Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices An Initiative of EUROsociAL+, the Transparency and Access to Information Network, and ParlAmericas This publication has been developed with the technical and financial support of the European Union. Its content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Additionally, this publication was made possible in part thanks to the generous support of the Government of Canada through Global Affairs Canada. Published in October 2020. TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue ................................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................8 2. How to use this toolkit ........................................................................................................................................11 3. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................12 4. Background on transparency and the right of access to public information .............................................................14 4.1 International sources: Freedom of expression and the right of access to public information ......................................................14 4.2 Basic principles
    [Show full text]
  • Network of African Parliamentary Committees of Health (Neapacoh) Meeting 2018
    NETWORK OF AFRICAN PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES OF HEALTH (NEAPACOH) MEETING 2018. th st A report on the meeting proceedings, 30 -31 November 2018 Partners in Population and Development Africa Regional Office (PPD ARO) Statistics House, 9 Colville Street Phone: +256 414 705-446 Fax: +256 414 705 454 Email: [email protected] Tweeter: #ppdafrica Website: http://www.partners- popdev.org/aro/ Kampala - Uganda Network of African Parliamentary Committees of Health (NEAPACOH) Meeting, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Objective of the meeting ................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Participation ..................................................................................................................... 7 Day One............................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.0 Session One: Opening ceremony ....................................................................................... 8 4.1 Remarks by Mr. Adnene Ben Haj Aissa, Executive Director, PPD ..................................... 9 4.2 Remarks by Hon. Ruth Labode, Chairperson, NEAPACOH .............................................. 10 4.3 Remarks by Mr. Alain Sibenaler, UNFPA Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Forecast
    May 2021 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 2 In Hindsight: Is There a Single Right Formula for In May, China will have the presidency of the Secu- Da’esh/ISIL (UNITAD) is also anticipated. the Arria Format? rity Council. The Council will continue to meet Other Middle East issues include meetings on: 4 Status Update since our virtually, although members may consider holding • Syria, the monthly briefings on political and April Forecast a small number of in-person meetings later in the humanitarian issues and the use of chemical 5 Peacekeeping month depending on COVID-19 conditions. weapons; China has chosen to initiate three signature • Lebanon, on the implementation of resolution 7 Yemen events in May. Early in the month, it will hold 1559 (2004), which called for the disarma- 8 Bosnia and a high-level briefing on Upholding“ multilateral- ment of all militias and the extension of gov- Herzegovina ism and the United Nations-centred internation- ernment control over all Lebanese territory; 9 Syria al system”. Wang Yi, China’s state councillor and • Yemen, the monthly meeting on recent 11 Libya minister for foreign affairs, is expected to chair developments; and 12 Upholding the meeting. Volkan Bozkir, the president of the • The Middle East (including the Palestinian Multilateralism and General Assembly, is expected to brief. Question), also the monthly meeting. the UN-Centred A high-level open debate on “Addressing the During the month, the Council is planning to International System root causes of conflict while promoting post- vote on a draft resolution to renew the South Sudan 13 Iraq pandemic recovery in Africa” is planned.
    [Show full text]