Abandoned Upon Arrival: Implica- Tions for Refugees and Local Communities Burdened by a U.S
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
1 111TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 111–52 ABANDONED UPON ARRIVAL: IMPLICA- TIONS FOR REFUGEES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES BURDENED BY A U.S. RESETTLEMENT SYSTEM THAT IS NOT WORKING A REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 21, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 57–483 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB seneagle COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin BOB CORKER, Tennessee BARBARA BOXER, California JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JIM DEMINT, South Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming JIM WEBB, Virginia ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York FRANK G. LOWENSTEIN, Staff Director KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................... v Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Findings .................................................................................................................... 2 Recommendations .................................................................................................... 4 Overview ................................................................................................................... 6 Case Study: Fort Wayne, Indiana ................................................................... 7 Case Study: Clarkston, Georgia ...................................................................... 11 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 14 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. 15 Appendix I—Summary of Refugee Admissions as of 30 April, 2010 ................... 17 Appendix II—Official Letter from City of Fort Wayne, Indiana .......................... 19 Appendix III—Refugee Article in the News-Sentinel ........................................... 21 Appendix IV—Refugee Article in the Journal Gazette ......................................... 23 Appendix V—Refugee Article in the New York Times ......................................... 24 Appendix VI—Legislation Introduced in the Georgia General Assembly, April 2003 ....................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix VII—Acronyms ........................................................................................ 38 (III) VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5905 Sfmt 5905 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5905 Sfmt 5905 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL UNITED STATES SENATE, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Washington, DC, July 21, 2010. DEAR COLLEAGUES: Since 1975, the United States has offered safe-haven to nearly 3 million refugees who faced persecution in Communist-controlled and conflict-ridden regions of the world. This resettlement reflects our Nation’s noblest humanitarian traditions, and should continue. But we must acknowledge that significant costs are associated with this activity. After consulting with community stakeholders in Indiana and elsewhere, and in light of the recent Presidential directive author- izing the admission of up to 80,000 refugees in FY 2010, I asked the Foreign Relations Committee minority staff, who have long monitored the conditions of vulnerable refugee populations during their travels, under the leadership of professional staff member Garrett Johnson to assess the government’s policies and programs for refugee admission and resettlement. Staff found that resettle- ment efforts in some U.S. cities are underfunded, overstretched, and failing to meet the basic needs of the refugee populations they are currently asked to assist. Especially in a difficult economic cli- mate, the current structure of the U.S. resettlement system is prov- ing a strain on local resources and community relations. As a former mayor, I am sensitive to the challenges faced by re- settlement cities in Indiana and across the country. U.S. refugee policies and procedures are determined at the Federal level, but the burdens of addressing the unique needs of refugees after they arrive are passed on to local communities, often without their con- sent. Some resettled refugees are illiterate in their native language or suffer from severe physical or mental ailments and many are ill- equipped to secure employment in an increasingly competitive job market. The financial and mentoring assistance required to help this population achieve self-sufficiency exceeds the resources cur- rently provided by the Federal Government. In Fort Wayne, IN, educators working with large refugee popu- lations resettled in the city have expressed frustration because they lack the time and tools to address the extraordinary needs of ref- ugee students. Poor performances on mandated standardized tests by some recently arrived refugee students, who often lack basic education after languishing in refugee camps for a decade or more, are negatively impacting the overall scores and reputations of schools. Public health officials also have raised concerns that some refugee populations, who have been found to suffer from elevated rates of latent tuberculosis (TB), are not undergoing adequate prearrival screening or properly monitoring their own treatment. Consequently, they face a higher risk of developing active TB, which is contagious and a potential health threat to the general population. (V) VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6621 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB vi The administration must demonstrate clearly to Congress and re- settlement communities how federal resources will be better matched with refugee admissions. In order to supplement this re- port and the administration’s inquiry, I have also asked the Gov- ernment Accountability Office to undertake a comprehensive re- view of the U.S. refugee resettlement system. In the future, the ad- ministration may determine that an increase in Federal funding or decrease in refugee admissions is warranted. But the practice of passing the costs of resettling refugees on to local communities should not continue. I was pleased to learn recently that Representative Anh ‘‘Joseph’’ Cao of Louisiana, who fled Communist-controlled Vietnam in 1975 as a refugee, was sponsored by a family from Goshen, IN, and spent many of his formative years as a Hoosier. His success and service as the first Vietnamese-American Member of Congress ex- emplifies the potential benefits gained by our country through of- fering safe haven to the persecuted of the world. The administra- tion and Congress must ensure that the refugee resettlement sys- tem is properly structured so that it continues to be perceived as a benefit and not a burden. This report and its recommendations are particularly timely given that discussions on reforming the refugee resettlement sys- tem have been initiated within the administration. I look forward to continuing to work with you on these issues, and I welcome any comments you have. Sincerely, RICHARD G. LUGAR, Ranking Member. VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:37 Jul 22, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6602 S:\HEARING FILES\LEGISLATIVE REPORTS\57483.TXT MIKEB ABANDONED UPON ARRIVAL: IMPLICATIONS FOR REFU- GEES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES BURDENED BY A U.S. RESETTLEMENT SYSTEM THAT IS NOT WORKING INTRODUCTION The United States, historically, is a nation of immigrants. In re- cent decades, however, it has also become a nation of refugees. Since 1975, the year in which hundreds of thousands of persons from Communist-controlled Vietnam started arriving on our shores, the United States has officially accepted for resettlement roughly 2.9 million refugees from strife-torn countries around the world. The United States has resettled more refugees than any other country. Legally, a refugee is someone admitted to the United States after Federal agencies have made a determination that he or she has been persecuted or has well-founded fear of potential persecution based on race, nationality, religion, membership in a particular group or political opinion and is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin. By contrast, the majority of immigrants al- lowed to enter America generally