Comparative Effects of Beta Adrenergic Blocking Drugs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Effects of Beta Adrenergic Blocking Drugs Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.30.1.9 on 1 February 1975. Downloaded from Thorax (1975), 30, 9. Comparative effects of beta adrenergic blocking drugs EDGAR SOWTON, D. S. DAS GUPTA1, and I. BAKER The Cardiac Department, Guy's Hospital, London SE] Sowton, E., Das Gupta, D. S., and Baker, I. (1975). Thorax, 30, 9-18. Comparative effects of beta adrenergic blocking drugs. Although many different beta blockers are now in clinical use, there is very little information concerning their relative efficacy, and it is still not clear what clinical importance should be attached to properties such as positive inotropic stimulation (intrinsic sympathomimetic activity or ISA) and membrane stabilizing action ('local anaesthetic effect' or 'quinidine-like effect'). In this report we compare the ability of patients with angina to exercise on a bicycle ergometer while receiving a series of commonly used beta blockers, and attempt to determine the impor- tance of ISA. The investigation is in four parts with the drugs given orally or intra- venously: statistical analysis of the results was carried out using standard methods, both parametric and non-parametric (Friedmann analysis of variance, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test) by two independent statisticians. copyright. The relevant properties of drugs included in this paper are summarized in Table I. Laboratory reports using many different animal preparations may differ from this assessment under specific conditions, and the Table is intended only as a guide to the generally accepted properties of these drugs when used clinically. Results for sotalol are included for reference in the first part of this paper but the drug was withdrawn http://thorax.bmj.com/ from clinical use and was not studied further. TABLE I steady-state erect exercise at 300 kpm/minute on a bicycle ergometer. Control measurements were Membrane Drug Trade Name Route given Activity ISA made 6 minutes after the start of the exercise, and changes were measured a fur- Propranolol Inderal IV and oral Yes No drug-induced Practolol Eraldin IV and oral Minimal Yes ther 6 minutes following intravenous injection of Alprenolol Aptin IV and oral Yes Yes on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected Oxprenolol Trasicor IV and oral Yes Yes one of five beta-blocking drugs. The haemody- MJ 1999 Sotalol IV Minimal No namic results are shown in Fig. 1, illustrating that Pindolol (LB46) Visken Oral Minimal Yes there are considerable differences between these drugs, particularly with regard to practolol; it might be anticipated that these differences are HAEMODYNAMIC COMPARISONS OF DRUGS reflected in the clinical responses of patients with As a basis for subsequent assessment of doses and angina. consideration of importance of ISA we present here some haemodynamic results obtained by Hoy, Gibson, and Sowton which have previously COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INTRAVENOUS DOSES been unpublished. Measurements of cardiac AT SEVERAL EXERCISE LEVELS output (dye dilution technique), intra-arterial Further data were obtained by comparing the pressure (via 1 mm Teflon tubes introduced per- inhibition of exercise tachycardia by four beta cutaneously into the brachial artery), and heart blocking drugs in groups of normal volunteers and rate (from ECG recordings) were taken during patients. The results are the mean from six sub- jects, and between groups there were no signifi- 'Present address- Department of Cardiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, 950 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA cant differences of heart rate at rest or at each 9 Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.30.1.9 on 1 February 1975. Downloaded from 10 E. Sowton, D. S. Das Gupta, and I. Baker been combined. The results are summarized in Table II. ficLav There is a tendency for these drugs to approach .I t) " Ra". - more closely the effect of propranolol as the exer- 2 1'.I .--.j cise level was increased, and also (with the excep- 1(} tion of sotalol) as the dose level was increased. ( t l. i !i l' Ii (-I.)L l , The molecular weights of the drugs are similar, I and so this milligram for milligram comparison approximates to a molecule for molecule basis. 11.I The relative potencies of the drugs differ con- 11 siderably and it is noteworthy that they differ S\ .; :.t - from values established in antagonism of an isoprenaline-induced tachycardia in laboratory I1 animals (cats) as determined by Barrett and ,., - Carter (1970) and shown in Table III. ~.R IjT} ul11, TABLE II i;\ '}1 F .,- COMPARATIVE SLOWING OF TACHYCARDIA DURING 4,'.-,I ERECT EXERCISE E t' (Propranolol effect = 100%) .; 0 r._ (I k-7.-- Exercise Level IV Dose Drug Rest Half Maximum Maximum 05 mg Propranolol 100 100 100 7 Practolol 70 30 30 z Alprenolol * 40 45 Sotalol * 50 30 copyright. 15 mg Propranolol 100 100 100 Practolol 40 55 55 FIG. 1. Haemodynamic changes 6 minutes after 5 mg Alprenolol * 50 70 Sotalol 20 40 45 intravenous 8 blocker during erect exercise. 50 mg Propranolol 100 100 100 Practolol 40 60 75 Alprenolol 17 60 75 exercise level on placebo tests. Also, there were Sotalol 20 30 45 http://thorax.bmj.com/ no significant differences in mean age nor in the total amount of exercise performed after either *Heart rate faster than control level. placebo or active drugs. Preliminary results with two drugs have been presented elsewhere (Sowton, TABLE III ANTAGONISM OF ISOPRENALINE TACHYCARDIA IN CATS 1970). Each subject underwent an exercise test, in which the maximal work load was established, Drug Relative and on each of four subsequent days re-exercised Potencies Propranolol 100 at levels of one quarter, one half, three quarters, Alprenolol 103 and maximum tolerance. A warm-up period of Oxprenolol 187 on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected Practolol 40 exercise, followed by 20 minutes' rest, preceded Sotalol 8 the definitive test on each occasion. At rest and Pindolol 2,480 for two minutes at each exercise level the heart rate was measured following intravenous injection of placebo (saline) and 0 5 mg, 15 mg and 5 mg COMPARATIVE INTRAVENOUS TRIAL IN ANGINA of active drug. Each investigation therefore con- The relative effects on exercise tolerance in 12 sisted of five exercise tests, during the last three patients with angina pectoris were studied using of which the subject had cumulative doses of intravenous injections of four beta blocking drugs 0 5 mg, 1X5 mg, and 5 mg of the test drug. Fig. 2 in doses based upon the results given above and a shows representative results following saline, consideration of the literature. These doses were: propranolol, practolol, and alprenolol injections. propranolol 5 mg, oxprenolol 5 mg, alprenolol The reduction in heart rate with propranolol 10 mg, and practolol 40 mg; in each case the was taken as 100% and the changes following manufacturers confirmed that these doses might other drugs were expressed proportionately. There be expected to produce similar improvement in were only minor differences in results for normal exercise tolerance. The drug solutions were pre- subjects or patients, and so these groups have pared in the Guy's Hospital pharmacy and the Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.30.1.9 on 1 February 1975. Downloaded from Comparative effects of beta adrenergic blocking drugs 11 PL ACEBO P ROPRANOLOL a0 4 .-- '---..g a0 .-.._..................... 0 5 - =~~~~~~~~- :e ;.-. n 0 14 a 3 Is I .0. O 20- a 0SOmg i I I 6 EXERCISE LEVlL ; " a- rw| EXERCISE LEVEL PRACTOLOL ALPRENOLOL I. i a0. 01.Smg 5' ~ ~ ~ ~ - I*Sm i ............e- ., .. - .*54m 51 .............---.... 6 oas -o_ copyright. 0a3 9 o i, U1 s i A i --- I -w- * s - - - w L a I -ig IV fAlleac" LIVLt EXERCISE LEVEL FIG 2. http://thorax.bmj.com/ trial was double-blind; the order of drugs was exercise was begun 3 minutes later at a work randomized, and all patients received all drugs. load of 200 kpm/minute. The work load was in- All patients had typical histories of angina pec- creased by 200 kpm/minute every 3 minutes until toris for the last three months and had abnormal anginal pain was produced; ECGs were continu- ECGs with typical ischaemic ST segment depres- ously monitored. Recordings were taken for 15 sion during exercise. There were 10 men and two seconds before the one-minute point and three- women with a mean age of 51 years; none had minute point at each work load, as well as at the on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected hypertension, valve disease, asthma, or chronic onset of anginal pain. The patients were then bronchitis, or gave a history of heart failure. All allowed to rest again until heart rates had re- had agina graded 2 or 3 (moderate or severe) on turned to baseline values, and 20 ml of beta-block- a 4-point scale in which grade 4 represents angina ing solution was injected. The exercise test was occurring at rest (Balcon, Maloy, and Sowton, then repeated using the same protocol. Assessment 1968). The only other drug used was sublingual of exercise tolerance was made by calculating the nitroglycerine, which was not taken on the morn- total work performed before the onset of angina, ing of the investigations. and the improvement over saline values was taken Exercise testing was carried out according to as a measure of the drug effect. There were no a standardized protocol at 9 am on separate days complications during this investigation and no in the sitting position on a bicycle ergometer patient complained of side effects. (Elema-Schonander). An initial warm-up for 3 minutes at 200 kpm/minute was followed by rest RESULTS The mean increase in total work before until the heart rate had returned to control values pain was greatest with practolol (1,250 kpm) (typically 20 to 30 minutes).
Recommended publications
  • Product List March 2019 - Page 1 of 53
    Wessex has been sourcing and supplying active substances to medicine manufacturers since its incorporation in 1994. We supply from known, trusted partners working to full cGMP and with full regulatory support. Please contact us for details of the following products. Product CAS No. ( R)-2-Methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine 112022-83-0 (-) (1R) Menthyl Chloroformate 14602-86-9 (+)-Sotalol Hydrochloride 959-24-0 (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2, 3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-phenylacetic 63422-71-9 acid (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2-3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-(4- 62893-24-7 hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid (r)-(+)-α-Lipoic Acid 1200-22-2 (S)-1-(2-Chloroacetyl) pyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile 207557-35-5 1,1'-Carbonyl diimidazole 530-62-1 1,3-Cyclohexanedione 504-02-9 1-[2-amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol acetate 839705-03-2 1-[2-Amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol Hydrochloride 130198-05-9 1-[Cyano-(4-methoxyphenyl) methyl] cyclohexanol 93413-76-4 1-Chloroethyl-4-nitrophenyl carbonate 101623-69-2 2-(2-Aminothiazol-4-yl) acetic acid Hydrochloride 66659-20-9 2-(4-Nitrophenyl)ethanamine Hydrochloride 29968-78-3 2,4 Dichlorobenzyl Alcohol (2,4 DCBA) 1777-82-8 2,6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 2.6 Diamino Pyridine 136-40-3 2-Aminoheptane Sulfate 6411-75-2 2-Ethylhexanoyl Chloride 760-67-8 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate 24468-13-1 2-Isopropyl-4-(N-methylaminomethyl) thiazole Hydrochloride 908591-25-3 4,4,4-Trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1,3-butane dione 720-94-5 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydrothieno[3,2,c] pyridine Hydrochloride 28783-41-7 4-Chloro-N-methyl-piperidine 5570-77-4
    [Show full text]
  • 2D6 Substrates 2D6 Inhibitors 2D6 Inducers
    Physician Guidelines: Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450’s 1 2D6 Substrates Acetaminophen Captopril Dextroamphetamine Fluphenazine Methoxyphenamine Paroxetine Tacrine Ajmaline Carteolol Dextromethorphan Fluvoxamine Metoclopramide Perhexiline Tamoxifen Alprenolol Carvedilol Diazinon Galantamine Metoprolol Perphenazine Tamsulosin Amiflamine Cevimeline Dihydrocodeine Guanoxan Mexiletine Phenacetin Thioridazine Amitriptyline Chloropromazine Diltiazem Haloperidol Mianserin Phenformin Timolol Amphetamine Chlorpheniramine Diprafenone Hydrocodone Minaprine Procainamide Tolterodine Amprenavir Chlorpyrifos Dolasetron Ibogaine Mirtazapine Promethazine Tradodone Aprindine Cinnarizine Donepezil Iloperidone Nefazodone Propafenone Tramadol Aripiprazole Citalopram Doxepin Imipramine Nifedipine Propranolol Trimipramine Atomoxetine Clomipramine Encainide Indoramin Nisoldipine Quanoxan Tropisetron Benztropine Clozapine Ethylmorphine Lidocaine Norcodeine Quetiapine Venlafaxine Bisoprolol Codeine Ezlopitant Loratidine Nortriptyline Ranitidine Verapamil Brofaramine Debrisoquine Flecainide Maprotline olanzapine Remoxipride Zotepine Bufuralol Delavirdine Flunarizine Mequitazine Ondansetron Risperidone Zuclopenthixol Bunitrolol Desipramine Fluoxetine Methadone Oxycodone Sertraline Butylamphetamine Dexfenfluramine Fluperlapine Methamphetamine Parathion Sparteine 2D6 Inhibitors Ajmaline Chlorpromazine Diphenhydramine Indinavir Mibefradil Pimozide Terfenadine Amiodarone Cimetidine Doxorubicin Lasoprazole Moclobemide Quinidine Thioridazine Amitriptyline Cisapride
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties and Units in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 479–552, 2000. © 2000 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE SCIENTIFIC DIVISION COMMITTEE ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)# and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY CHEMISTRY AND HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SECTION COMMISSION ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)§ PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES PART XII. PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (Technical Report) (IFCC–IUPAC 1999) Prepared for publication by HENRIK OLESEN1, DAVID COWAN2, RAFAEL DE LA TORRE3 , IVAN BRUUNSHUUS1, MORTEN ROHDE1, and DESMOND KENNY4 1Office of Laboratory Informatics, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Drug Control Centre, London University, King’s College, London, UK; 3IMIM, Dr. Aiguader 80, Barcelona, Spain; 4Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland #§The combined Memberships of the Committee and the Commission (C-NPU) during the preparation of this report (1994–1996) were as follows: Chairman: H. Olesen (Denmark, 1989–1995); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1996); Members: X. Fuentes-Arderiu (Spain, 1991–1997); J. G. Hill (Canada, 1987–1997); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1994–1997); H. Olesen (Denmark, 1985–1995); P. L. Storring (UK, 1989–1995); P. Soares de Araujo (Brazil, 1994–1997); R. Dybkær (Denmark, 1996–1997); C. McDonald (USA, 1996–1997). Please forward comments to: H. Olesen, Office of Laboratory Informatics 76-6-1, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgment, with full reference to the source, along with use of the copyright symbol ©, the name IUPAC, and the year of publication, are prominently visible.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANDATE® (Labetalol Hydrochloride) Tablets
    NDA 18716/S-026 Page 2 PRODUCT INFORMATION TRANDATE® (labetalol hydrochloride) Tablets DESCRIPTION: Trandate Tablets are adrenergic receptor blocking agents that have both selective alpha1-adrenergic and nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocking actions in a single substance. Labetalol hydrochloride (HCl) is a racemate chemically designated as 2-hydroxy-5-[1-hydroxy-2-[(1­ methyl-3-phenylpropyl)amino]ethyl]benzamide monohydrochloride, and it has the following structure: Labetalol HCl has the empirical formula C19H24N2O3•HCl and a molecular weight of 364.9. It has two asymmetric centers and therefore exists as a molecular complex of two diastereoisomeric pairs. Dilevalol, the R,R′ stereoisomer, makes up 25% of racemic labetalol. Labetalol HCl is a white or off-white crystalline powder, soluble in water. Trandate Tablets contain 100, 200, or 300 mg of labetalol HCl and are taken orally. The tablets also contain the inactive ingredients corn starch, FD&C Yellow No. 6 (100- and 300-mg tablets only), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, lactose, magnesium stearate, pregelatinized corn starch, sodium benzoate (200-mg tablet only), talc (100-mg tablet only), and titanium dioxide. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Labetalol HCl combines both selective, competitive, alpha1-adrenergic blocking and nonselective, competitive, beta-adrenergic blocking activity in a single substance. In man, the ratios of alpha- to beta-blockade have been estimated to be approximately 1:3 and 1:7 following oral and intravenous (IV) administration, respectively. Beta2-agonist activity has been demonstrated in animals with minimal beta1-agonist (ISA) activity detected. In animals, at doses greater than those required for alpha- or beta-adrenergic blockade, a membrane stabilizing effect has been demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Slow Trasicor Tablets 160Mg (Oxprenolol Hydrochloride)
    Prescribing information slow trasicor tablets 160mg (oxprenolol hydrochloride) Presentation: Contains 160mg oxprenolol hydrochloride in a danger of cardiac arrest, a calcium antagonist of the verapamil sustained-release tablet type must not be administered intravenously to patients already indication: Hypertension and angina pectoris (long-term receiving treatment with a beta-blocker. Beta-blockers should be prophylaxis) discontinued in patients who are at increased risk for anaphylaxis. Dosage and administration: Oral tablets to be swallowed whole. interactions: Verapamil, diltiazem, disopyramide, quinidine, Adults: Hypertension: 160mg once daily. If necessary, the dosage amiodarone, adrenaline, noradrenaline, isoprenaline, ephedrine, can be raised to 320mg. Angina pectoris: 160mg once daily. If phenylephrine, clonidine, guanethidine, reserpine, oral antidiabetic necessary, the dosage can be raised to 320mg. Elderly: No special drugs, NSAIDs, cimetidine, ergot alkaloids, anaesthetics, digitalis dosage regimen is necessary but concurrent hepatic insufficiency glycosides, lidocaine and alcohol. should be taken into account. Children: Not recommended. Pregnancy and lactation: Use with caution during pregnancy contraindications: Hypersensitivity to oxprenolol and related especially in the first 3 months. Breast feeding is not recommended. derivatives, cross-sensitivity to other beta-blockers or to any of the Undesirable effects: Very Common: Dry mouth, constipation. excipients, cardiogenic shock, second or third degree atrioventricular Common:
    [Show full text]
  • Fatal Toxicity of Antidepressant Drugs in Overdose
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 295 24 OCTOBER 1987 1021 Br Med J (Clin Res Ed): first published as 10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1021 on 24 October 1987. Downloaded from PAPERS AND SHORT REPORTS Fatal toxicity of antidepressant drugs in overdose SIMON CASSIDY, JOHN HENRY Abstract dangerous in overdose, thus meriting investigation of their toxic properties and closer consideration of the circumstances in which A fatal toxicity index (deaths per million National Health Service they are prescribed. Recommendations may thus be made that prescriptions) was calculated for antidepressant drugs on sale might reduce the number offatalities. during the years 1975-84 in England, Wales, and Scotland. The We used national mortality statistics and prescription data tricyclic drugs introduced before 1970 had a higher index than the to compile fatal toxicity indices for the currently available anti- mean for all the drugs studied (p<0-001). In this group the depressant drugs to assess the comparative safety of the different toxicity ofamitriptyline, dibenzepin, desipramine, and dothiepin antidepressant drugs from an epidemiological standpoint. Owing to was significantly higher, while that ofclomipramine, imipramine, the nature of the disease these drugs are particularly likely to be iprindole, protriptyline, and trimipramine was lower. The mono- taken in overdose and often cause death. amine oxidase inhibitors had intermediate toxicity, and the antidepressants introduced since 1973, considered as a group, had significantly lower toxicity than the mean (p<0-001). Ofthese newer drugs, maprotiline had a fatal toxicity index similar to that Sources ofinformation and methods of the older tricyclic antidepressants, while the other newly The statistical sources used list drugs under their generic and proprietary http://www.bmj.com/ introduced drugs had lower toxicity indices, with those for names.
    [Show full text]
  • Pindolol, and Slow-Release Propranolol
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 285 13 NOVthER 1982 1387 Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol, metoprolol, pindolol, and slow-release propranolol J S FLORAS, J V JONES, M 0 HASSAN, P SLEIGHT Abstract beta-blockers suggests, however, that they might not reduce blood pressure effectively for a full 24 hours.5-7 Most studies of Intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure was measured once-daily beta-blockade have measured clinic blood pressure at over 24 hours, in 34 patients with newly diagnosed rest or during exercise, or both.8- 1 Atenolol, metoprolol, hypertension, both before and after double-blind ran- pindolol, and slow-release propranolol, among others, have been domisation to treatment with atenolol (n=9), metoprolol studied in this fashion. (n=9), pindolol (n=9), or propranolol in its slow-release Continuous ambulatory monitoring, which gives a direct, form (n=7). The dosage of each drug was adjusted at beat-to-beat measure of blood pressure, has advantages over monthly clinic visits until satisfactory control of blood clinic cuff records in assessing the extent and duration of effect pressure was achieved (140/90 mm Hg or less by cuff) of antihypertensive agents when subjects are at liberty to go or the maximum dose in the study protocol was reached. about their normal daily activities.'9 Earlier, we found that ateno- A second intra-arterial recording was made after these lol taken once daily for two to nine months effectively reduced drugs had been taken once daily at 0800 for three to eight ambulatory blood pressure for up to 28 hours after the last dose months (mean 50± SD 1 4) and was started four hours was administered.20 Other beta-blocking agents have been after the last dose.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault Panel, Blood
    DRUG-FACILITATED SEXUAL ASSAULT PANEL, BLOOD Blood Specimens (Order Code 70500) Alcohols Analgesics, cont. Anticonvulsants, cont. Antihistamines, cont. Ethanol Phenylbutazone Phenytoin Cyclizine Amphetamines Piroxicam Pregabalin Diphenhydramine Amphetamine Salicylic Acid* Primidone Doxylamine BDB Sulindac* Topiramate Fexofenadine Benzphetamine Tapentadol Zonisamide Guaifenesin Ephedrine Tizanidine Antidepressants Hydroxyzine MDA Tolmetin Amitriptyline Loratadine MDMA Tramadol Amoxapine Oxymetazoline* Mescaline* Anesthetics Bupropion Pyrilamine Methcathinone Benzocaine Citalopram Tetrahydrozoline Methamphetamine Bupivacaine Clomipramine Triprolidine Phentermine Etomidate Desipramine Antipsychotics PMA Ketamine Desmethylclomipramine 9-hydroxyrisperidone Phenylpropanolamine Lidocaine Dosulepin Aripiprazole Pseudoephedrine Mepivacaine Doxepin Buspirone Analgesics Methoxetamine Duloxetine Chlorpromazine Acetaminophen Midazolam Fluoxetine Clozapine Baclofen Norketamine Fluvoxamine Fluphenazine Buprenorphine Pramoxine* Imipramine Haloperidol Carisoprodol Procaine 1,3-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) Mesoridazine Cyclobenzaprine Rocuronium Mianserin* Norclozapine Diclofenac Ropivacaine Mirtazapine Olanzapine Etodolac Antibiotics Nefazodone Perphenazine Fenoprofen Azithromycin* Nordoxepin Pimozide Hydroxychloroquine Chloramphenicol* Norfluoxetine Prochlorperazine Ibuprofen Ciprofloxacin* Norsertraline Quetiapine Ketoprofen Clindamycin* Nortriptyline Risperidone Ketorolac Erythromycin* Norvenlafaxine Thioridazine Meclofenamic Acid* Levofloxacin* Paroxetine
    [Show full text]
  • Hallucinogens: an Update
    National Institute on Drug Abuse RESEARCH MONOGRAPH SERIES Hallucinogens: An Update 146 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Public Health Service • National Institutes of Health Hallucinogens: An Update Editors: Geraline C. Lin, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Richard A. Glennon, Ph.D. Virginia Commonwealth University NIDA Research Monograph 146 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This monograph is based on the papers from a technical review on “Hallucinogens: An Update” held on July 13-14, 1992. The review meeting was sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other material in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. Opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policy of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or any other part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The U.S. Government does not endorse or favor any specific commercial product or company.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
    PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational
    [Show full text]