FEATURES The “Golden Hour” Standard

Trauma surgeons treating patient at Camp Taqaddam

Transforming Combat Health Support U.S. Marine Corps (Jim Goodwin)

By G u y S. S t r a w d e r

ontinuous improvement in last. At the heart of that conviction is the hour. While this standard may have formed immediate, life-saving treatment standard to which the entire brotherhood of the foundation of the Nation’s civilian emer- on the battlefield is an institu- military medicine must hold itself person- gency medical service, it is forever rooted C tional obsession within military ally accountable: the golden hour, broadly in the battlefield experiences of the military medicine. Combat medics, corpsmen, nurses, the first 60 minutes following trauma or the health system (MHS) in the previous century. and surgeons return from contingency onset of acute illness. The chances of survival Military medicine’s commitment to missions determined to save lives in future are greatest if or advanced trauma high standards and its mission, along with wars that were just beyond their reach in the life support can be provided within that the experience derived in combat, has consis- tently produced major contributions to the Lieutenant Colonel Guy S. Strawder, USA, is Director of the Prime Operations Division, TRICARE larger body of medicine and increased under- Management Activity. standing in advanced trauma care, burn

60 JFQ / issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 ndupress.ndu.edu Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2006 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2006 to 00-00-2006

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER The ’Golden Hour’ Standard: Transforming Combat Health Support 5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION National Defense University,Institute for National Strategic Studies,260 REPORT NUMBER Fifth Ave SW Fort Lesley J. McNair,Washington,DC,20319

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

14. ABSTRACT

15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 8 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR)

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 Strawder

therapy, and emergency surgery. According effectively reduce mortality and morbidity. trauma life support. Actually, 67 percent to the U.S. Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Unfortunately, we have yet to achieve the die within the first 30 minutes, creating Richard Carmona, a former Special Forces attributes of a genuine joint system that even more urgency for rapid access of the medic in Vietnam: takes full advantage of all Service capabili- wounded by level I and II medical person- ties. Despite incremental improvements, the nel.4 An estimated half of the total die due to Military medicine has led civilian medicine in medical forces in the Services continue to exsanguination ( to death). Success many ways; particularly since World War II, function more as a composite, contingency remains firmly affixed to bringing the full when the generation before us first developed organization rather than a single, seamless, measure of medicine to bear within that first ways to provide combat casualty care as close interoperable CHS system. 60 minutes. to the battlefield as possible. . . . Military We continue to collect and process the surgeons in all branches since the Civil War The Current System medical lessons learned from Operations have led the way in improving the health of Creating this transformed joint CHS Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, but the Nation through their wartime experiences. system must begin with a common vision two themes are clearly emerging. First, in From sanitation to infectious disease and and a standard objective. First and foremost, spite of the outmoded design and struc- combat casualty care, this country owes the military a huge debt of gratitude.1 there remains a disconnect between the increased sophistication of our treatment capabilities and the combat More recent MHS efforts have empha- sized advancements in communications, health support system that employs them information technologies that facilitate decisionmaking, the miniaturization of diag- it should emphasize structuring our opera- ture of the CHS system, we are gradually nostic and therapeutic equipment to increase tions and doctrine around the golden hour as migrating toward increased emphasis on our capabilities in austere environments, and the center of gravity, because the 60 minutes deliberate joint operational planning and the advanced training of combat medics to following trauma remain the principal execution. Second, our Service operational enable them to function more independently standard that dictates the system’s ultimate planners are organizing medical resources in saving lives. Despite these profound success or failure. Historically, wound data with increasing regard to the actual point enhancements in military medicine, however, and casualty rates indicate that more than 90 of and adopting a philosophy of far- there remains a disconnect between the percent of all casualties die within the first forward placement of assets—in essence, to increased sophistication of our treatment hour of severe wounding without advanced beat the golden hour. Both of these evolu- capabilities and the combat health support (CHS) system that employs them. Figure 1 The current CHS architecture is gen- erally planned and arrayed in five distinct Levels of Combat Health Support levels for a contingency operation, which FLOT FLOT may extend from the forward line of troops Level I. Includes self-aid, buddy aid, and combat lifesaver skills. Also includes Transforming Combat Health Support (FLOT) all the way to the “brick-and-mortar” emergency medical treatment provided by combat medics and corpsmen and advanced military and Veterans Affairs trauma management provided by physicians and physician assistants. Highest level treatment capability: Army medical platoons (battalion aid stations) and USMC

located in the United States. Each higher trauma platoons. Increasing Treatment Capability & Patient Movement level represents an increased sophistication Level II. Includes physician-directed , advanced trauma management, in treatment capability, but a decreasing emergency medical procedures, and forward resuscitative surgery. Supporting capability with regard to tactical mobility and capabilities may include basic laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, dental, limited blood products, and temporary patient holding facilities. Highest level treatment capability: survivability. Joint and Service doctrinal defi- Army division-level medical support, USMC Level II asset is the surgical company, nitions for each level of care vary marginally and USAF EMEDS Basic and EMEDS +10. due to Service-specific support requirements, Level III. Includes resuscitation, initial wound surgery, postoperative care, and more but they essentially complement one another. advanced ancillary services. May also include restoration of functional health (definitive care). Highest level treatment capability: Army combat support hospitals, Each level is characterized by the features Navy and USMC fleet hospitals, and USAF EMEDS +25. listed in figure 1.2 Level IV. Includes rehabilitative and recovery therapy for those who may return to The CHS system is represented by duty if convalescence from injury does not exceed the established theater evacuation this architecture and the sum total of all the policy. This level of care is becoming less prevalent in contemporary warfare and battlefield patient management. Highest level treatment capability: Army field Increasing Tactical Mobility/Survivability Tactical Increasing military’s structures, personnel, assets, and hospitals, general hospitals, and combat support echelon above corps. equipment organized for the purpose of C O N U S maintaining a fit force, preventing casual- Level V. Includes the full range of acute convalescent, restorative, and rehabilitative ties, and treating the wounded.3 Ideally, this care. Highest level treatment capability: permanent military or Veterans Affairs hospitals or civilian hospitals that have committed beds for the National Defense system should be able to exploit technologies Medical System. and advanced practices—both medical and otherwise—and apply them in battlespace at the appropriate point and time to most

ndupress.ndu.edu issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 / JFQ 61 the “ g o l d e n h o ur ” sta n d ar d

tions, however, can be largely credited to Respiratory therapist checking Iraqi the creativity of commanders at the tactical soldier at Air Force theater hospital and operational levels, who must often plan at Balad Air Base, Iraq around the inefficiencies of the present CHS system design. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in a speech on transformation at the National Defense University in January 2002, cited the success of the German military, which was technically only “10 or 15 percent transformed,” with its use of Blitzkrieg in World War II: “What was revolutionary and unprecedented about the Blitzkrieg was not doctrine continues to work in contradiction to innovations the new capabilities the Germans employed, but rather the unprecedented and revolution- ary way that they mixed new and existing capabilities.”5 The essential components for a revolu- tionary change in the combat health system are similarly achievable today. In instances during Iraqi Freedom where units were thinking far-forward and joint, the successes were monumental and were responsible for a died-of-wounds rate of about 1 percent. The Air Force changed its doctrine to configure any available airframe in theater to transport casualties and went so far as to conduct aeromedical evacuations directly from level II facilities in the brigade area of operations. Far-forward surgery enjoyed unprecedented success. Forward Resuscitative Surgical Squads supporting the Marine Corps lost none of the casualties they received. For the first time ever, the Army attached a forward surgical team with every brigade commit- ted. In certain circumstances, surgical assets were collocated with battalion aid stations.

Some Army medical evacuation aircraft News (Lance Cheung) Air Force were positioned closer to maneuver units to facilitate immediate launch and move- ment of casualties from collection points to where the value of modernizing each compo- stated, we have to become “light, lean, and definitive care facilities. Information systems nent is maximized. Genuine transformation responsive.” Over recent years, this has were fielded as far forward as the level I and means changing the shape, design, and even become a euphemism for force reduction. level II units to provide surveillance against functional processes to respond to global Yet a strong case can be made within the emerging medical threats throughout the shifts in technology, environment, and geo- context of current strategic requirements theater. Improved equipment and therapeu- politics. The charge against the military has that medical personnel (along with military tics, including the use of fibrin-impregnated always been that we continue to fight the last police, engineers, and civil affairs) should , were credited with saving lives that war. Transformation requires the vision to expand. Whether the requirement is for once would have been lost. see the next war and the boldness to pursue humanitarian assistance, stability opera- Unfortunately, doctrine continues to the changes necessary to ensure success. tions, or intense combat, a robust medical work in contradiction to these innovations. It As Lieutenant General George capability has become indispensable for is possible to arrive at a point in every system Taylor, the Air Force Surgeon General, has every contingency.

62 JFQ / issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 ndupress.ndu.edu Strawder

Nonetheless, the present system has Soldiers providing to victim not changed remarkably since World War after attack in Tal Afar, Iraq II. Largely designed by Colonel Edward Churchill, USA, around his concept of wound management, the medical support system “allowed forward hospitals to be more mobile, and concentrated more resource- intensive casualty care far to the rear in secure base areas where evacuation hospi- tals [would not be] required to move with changing tactical situations.”6 The primary objective of this concept was to maximize the number of Servicemembers we could return to duty in theater and was embedded in an operational precept that valued mass over speed as a principal of war. Today, we need medical units that are capable of rapid force projection and, once in theater, can enjoin an operational tempo that adversaries cannot sustain. We need flexible and adaptable units that can morph and function as commanders choose to dictate conditions and tempo on the battlefield. By creating this high-velocity environment, we can control the enemy’s decision cycle and force him to wage a war he Fleet Combat Camera Group, Pacific (Alan D. Monyelle) ultimately cannot win. To accomplish this, every battlefield operating system must be able to meet these preconditions of speed and enable the CHS system to catch up with the gies envisioned by the Army Medical Depart- adaptability. Without substantial change, the other battlefield operating systems. The most ment will undoubtedly improve operational current combat health support system will disturbing finding was: capabilities and save lives, but their effective- not meet that challenge. ness will be limited if they are incorporated In 2003, RAND completed a study The fact that the HSS [health service support] into an outmoded organizational design. The that followed several Army transformation assets available to the future force UA [unit organizational structure for combat health support must be engineered to meet the there is perhaps no function on the battlefield with known and expected challenges of planned more potential for exploiting joint capabilities than the contingencies, yet flexible enough to respond to less predictable scenarios. The design that combat health support system is currently welded into the Army’s transfor- mation plans has been adequate for the past exercises to assess “the medical risks associ- of action] battalion in this scenario (that is, two decades but does not seem sufficient to ated with emerging Army operational con- all brigade assets, a CHS at division, and all meet the demands of the near future. cepts and the capacity of the Army Medical the aerial medical evacuation assets allocated Department to mitigate these risks.”7 In to the division) were probably more than Transform and Perform essence, RAND’s charter was to determine what would reasonably be expected suggests For purposes of describing a general if the envisioned CHS system was adequate that the HSS systems portrayed in these three concept of CHS transformation, the model for future Army combat operations. Their workshops, even in optimized and undegraded proposed here uses the Army’s maneuver conclusion was, “Probably not.” In the states, were inadequate.8 brigade as its organizational structure; exercises they followed, the CHS system was however, it likely is equally applicable to the overwhelmed with scenarios that introduced The most recent transformation efforts Marine expeditionary brigade. The three only modest casualties. Critical capabilities of the Army Medical Department include main recommendations below are especially such as surgical capacity, evacuation assets, plans for a more robust command and relevant to the Army’s vision in the creation and logistics were quickly exhausted. Further, control structure for brigade-level medical of brigade units of action. Ultimately, these the health service architecture evaluated CHS, but, by and large, the fundamental brigades will replace the division as the represented a “best-case scenario,” and under elements do not appear to have changed primary Army warfighting unit, and the more realistic circumstances the outcomes from 20 years ago. If we truly desire brigade- CHS system that supports them must be would have been even worse. In fact, the centric organizations, the medical support reengineered to support this doctrinal shift. exercises required an operational pause to structure must be enhanced. The technolo- All the battlefield operating systems in these ndupress.ndu.edu issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 / JFQ 63 the “ g o l d e n h o ur ” sta n d ar d brigades must have command and control lary services, such as preventive medicine, prevention of casualties (such as medical capabilities to operate independently, unit dental support, laboratory, and radiology. intelligence reports and digitized surveillance architecture that allows them to deploy flex- A generic organizational design proposal is of the area of operations), and providing a ibly, and subordinate units that can project provided in figure 2. more effective life-saving capability for his rapidly and sustain significant combat power. This direct command relationship wounded Soldiers or Marines. Moreover, this redesign must support the would provide the maneuver brigade com- A more subtle but no less important ability to perform in a more joint fashion. mander with a comprehensive treatment and advantage in this transformational design There is perhaps no function on the battle- surgical capability allowing him to function is the mentoring and professional develop- field with more potential for exploiting joint independently from the forward support bat- ment that a medical battalion commander capabilities than the CHS system. talion. He owns the assets. Additionally, the provides to junior medical operations Expand level II medical support. medical battalion commander would have a officers in the maneuver brigades. Today’s Brigadier General Edward Usher, USMC, vantage that allows him to view and direct all medical company commander must be able the Commanding General of the 1st Force available medical assets consistent with the to: predict areas of casualty density, evaluate Service Support Group, I Marine Expedi- brigade maneuver plan in order to weigh the routes of evacuation and plan casualty collec- tionary Force, in Operation Iraqi Freedom, main effort of the operation and to reposi- tion points for use during the fight, deconflict has praised the performance of the forward tion them in real time as conditions change airspace management for aeromedical evacu- resuscitative surgical squads that accom- on the battlefield. Above all, a medical ation routes with the brigade aviation liaison panied their level II medical units in direct battalion commander provides a seasoned officer, determine how to tailor limited support of Marines engaged in combat: “I leader on the brigade staff to integrate the resources while still supporting the main didn’t want to take them to war, but now I combat support planning into the maneuver effort, evaluate and coordinate the necessity wouldn’t go to war without them.”9 Every plan. He is also directly accountable to the for additional corps assets, plan and operate combat unit that directly witnesses a fully brigade commander for the plans and poli- communications networks, precoordinate all equipped and prepared medical support cies that maintain a healthy and fit force (for fixed and rotary-wing aeromedical evacua- force at work can immediately appreciate its example, vaccinations and dental readiness), tion support, synchronize the efforts of every overwhelming value. I propose an organizational design that would include a medical battalion as organic Figure 2 to the maneuver brigades. Medical platoons need to expand to company-sized elements. Proposed Organizational Design for Combat Health Support These medical companies would provide suf- in the Brigade Units of Action ficient personnel to:

n outfit the rifle companies with a full complement of combat medics n increase evacuation assets to support multiple casualty collection points SURG n adequately staff a battalion aid station to execute split-team operations OPT n provide medics for widely dispersed operational areas with regular support to DENT scouts, mortars, and antitank units (which are not currently authorized organic medical support) BH n transition the company’s mission to area support for humanitarian civic assis- tance actions following combat operations. TMT TMT TMT

LEGEND Each of these medical companies Command & Control EVAC EVAC EVAC would continue to maintain a direct support Operational Alignment relationship to the maneuver battalions as TMT Treatment (Advanced Trauma Life Support) the medical platoons do now, but they would EVAC Evacuation CM CM CM ultimately come under the command and CM Combat Medics control of a medical battalion commander BH Behavioral Health on the maneuver brigade commander’s staff. OPT Optometry Services DENT Dental Services Assets under the immediate control of the SURG Surgery medical battalion commander would include a forward surgical capability and other ancil-

64 JFQ / issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 ndupress.ndu.edu Strawder

Sailors evacuate wounded Iraqi soldier during Operation Steel Curtain Marine Division Combat Camera (Michael R. McMaugh) st 1 Download as wallpaper at ndupress.ndu.edu. medical platoon and section in the brigade for combined arms operations, and tech- 2010/2020. While the operational concepts area of operations, and other activities—all nologies along with it, but the CHS system of that effort have had some influence on before the first shot is fired. It is a daunt- remains largely ensconced in the more dated subsequent operations, the force structure of ing responsibility for a young captain who paradigm. level III medical facilities has not experienced likely has received little mentorship from a The shortcomings in level III hos- commensurate change. seasoned medical service corps officer during pitals have become increasingly apparent The Force Health Protection compo- his career. Clearly, the operational constraint as combat operations and tactics advance. nent of Joint Vision 2010 advocated a single of the golden hour separates combat health After-action reviews from Afghanistan and joint theater hospital design that could be support from every other logistic function. Iraq, from both medical leadership and the adopted by all Services. This new level III Establish the joint theater hospital. This line, continue to lament the lack of modular- facility would be capable of providing essen- emphasis on the golden hour and level I ity and scalability of hospitals. The current tial care in theater, as opposed to the more and II units does not suggest a diminished design of Army combat support hospitals comprehensive care that could be gotten role for level III hospitals. It does, however, and Navy fleet hospitals is a Cold War relic: from existing combat support hospitals and point to a fundamentally different and more massive unit assemblages that are incapable fleet hospitals. The concept offers countless dynamic role than present doctrine allows. of rapid force projection, immobile once advantages over the current design. By focus- Five levels of care have been historically they arrive in theater, incapable of echeloned ing on essential care of casualties, a joint arranged, both tactically and operationally, movement to maintain continuity of support theater hospital could dramatically reduce to support a large, static, and linear theater for maneuver units, and designed so rigidly weight and cubic volume of its equipment of war and to displace casualties accord- that it is virtually impossible to tailor them and supplies to facilitate more rapid deploy- ing to the severity of their conditions. The to changing conditions on a high-tempo ment in support of contingency operations. primary objective of the present CHS system battlefield. A conceptual design for a joint Furthermore, a joint theater hospital is to maximize the return-to-duty rate to theater hospital was outlined by the Joint must assume a modular design that enables maintain as many warfighters in the combat Staff in 1997, the product of an enormous tri- the unit to deploy in echelons. This pro- zone as possible. Doctrine has since changed Service effort under the rubric of Joint Vision vides two advantages. First, a small level III ndupress.ndu.edu issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 / JFQ 65 the “ g o l d e n h o ur ” sta n d ar d capability could be quickly inserted with aeromedical evacuation assets that provide maintenance are more easily facilitated when rapid deployment combat forces to provide more sophisticated clinical capability for en the whole CHS system is operating under a surgery, patient hold, and a more definitive route care. Recent experiences in Operation common set of requirements. The greatest care capability consistent with requirements Iraqi Freedom, however, indicate that the Air benefit is the potential to leverage the entire for the combat force buildup. Second, once Force may be prepared for this challenge. inventory of medical personnel across the a hospital is fully deployed in theater, it can New changes in aeromedical evacuation MHS to staff these hospitals. Service-specific requirements are less pronounced beyond once units across all Services are equally equipped, the division rear boundary. The unit of trained, and functioning as joint hospitals, productivity is essentially the same—treating the wounds and saving the lives of individual any Service could support the casualty flows from Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines. Once brigade medical units units across all Services are equally equipped, trained, and functioning as joint hospitals, move in sections (or echelons) to support doctrine, equipment, and organization are any Service could support the casualty flows the advance or other offensive operations well synchronized with the demands of this from brigade medical units. of combat forces. This creates a tactical transformed combat health system. Streamline five levels of care to three. advantage that is impossible under existing A single joint design also enhances By expanding the resources of level II units, designs. It also offers greater flexibility to interoperability between the Services. creating a more dynamic level III capability, commanders for quickly tailoring medical Combatant commanders and staff, as well emphasizing en route patient care to sustain units for a broad range of contingencies— as strategic movement planners, would now stabilized patients, and using definitive fixed whether humanitarian assistance actions, recognize a lone menu of options for hospital facilities outside of the combat zone, we can stability operations, or more intense combat support, irrespective of Service color, to now pare the five-level system to three levels. operations. support the different phases of a given opera- Level I would represent brigade (division) The joint theater hospital, by necessity, tion. Medical logistic support, biomedical level medical support, with no distinction would be more dependent on responsive maintenance repair, and general support between the battalion aid station and medical

Soldier and medic preparing for security convoy, Operation Iraqi Freedom Combat Camera Squadron (Sarayuth Pinthong) Combat Camera Squadron st 1

66 JFQ / issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 ndupress.ndu.edu Strawder

company capability since the full Secretary of the Navy Donald Winter visiting complement of advanced trauma Marine at National Naval Medical Center in and surgical care is organic to Bethesda, Maryland the medical battalion and can be employed wherever the battlefield dictates. Level II would represent the stabilizing care capability pro- vided by the joint theater hospital. Level III would provide definitive care and is represented by any fixed facility positioned beyond the combat zone.

Tenets for Critical Thinking Transformation of any system must begin with a vision. General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has stated, “I will tell you categorically that if we change none of our toys and simply change the way we think about how to apply them, we will have transfor- mation on a very, very fast pace.”10 It 1st Combat Camera Squadron (Sarayuth Pinthong) would be easier to continue on our current path and accept incremental change casualties can be furnished by all medical tion, Medical and Rehabilitative Care,” Force Health to the current design, particularly given our evacuation teams (ground and air), both Protection Capstone Document, available at . 4 CHS transformation will invite controversy. care can be given by fixed facilities positioned Russ Zajtchuk and Gordon R. Sullivan, An article in Army Magazine stated, “Army outside the combat zone. “Battlefield Trauma Care: Focus on Advanced Tech- nology,” Military Medicine 160 (January 1995), 2. leaders must create an environment where n We must beat the clock. We have only 5 Donald H. Rumsfeld, “Remarks as Deliv- critical thinking is the norm and reasoned recently explored the advantages of forcing ered by the Secretary of Defense, National Defense 11 debate replaces unspoken dissent.” the full impact of American medicine into University, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC, Can those who represent the MHS find that first 60 minutes following trauma on January 31, 2002,” available at . experience, and intellect to create a dynamic every minute is golden. 6 Thomas E. Bowen, Emergency War medical system that will more effectively Surgery: Second United States Revision of the Emer- serve the next generation of warfighters? Every attempt to press the limits of gency War Surgery NATO Handbook (Washington, Ideally, this discussion will provide a point these tenets will result in a more responsive DC: Government Printing Office, 1988), 1–2. 7 of departure for further discourse, but and joint CHS system that meets the chal- David E. Johnson and Gary Cecchine, perhaps most will agree on at least the fol- lenges of the golden hour standard. The true Conserving the Future Force Fighting Strength: Findings from the Army Medical Department Trans- lowing tenets: benefit will be the lives saved. JFQ formation Workshops, 2002 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2004), xiii. n NOTES The design of the combat health 8 Ibid., 29. support system must be capable of enjoining 9 Joel Lees, presentation as delivered on the 1 an operational tempo commensurate with Richard H. Carmona, “The Role of Mili- I Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) Warfighters that of the combat forces we support. tary Medicine in Civilian Emergency Response,” Medical Lessons Learned, Operation Iraqi Freedom n We must commit ourselves to becom- available at . VA, September 24–25, 2004. 2 See Department of the Army, Field Manual 10 a seamless system that leverages Service Rumsfeld. 8–10–6, Medical Evacuation in a Theater of Opera- 11 core competencies for the entire theater and David A. Fastabend and Robert H. tions: Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (Washing- maximizes economies of scale for competen- Simpson, “The Imperative for a Culture of Inno- ton, DC: Government Printing Office, 2000), 1–8 vation in the U.S. Army: Adapt or Die,” Army cies that are not Service-specific. through 1–10. See also Joint Publication 4–02, Doc- Magazine 54, no. 2 (February 2004), available at n Medical assets must be planned and trine for Health Service Support in Joint Operations, . ation allows. dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp4_02.pdf>. n Essential care must be provided in 3 The Joint Staff, “Force Health Protection: theater; effective en route care that sustains A Healthy and Fit Force, Prevention and Protec- ndupress.ndu.edu issue 41, 2 d quarter 2006 / JFQ 67