DOCSLIB.ORG

Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities VOL. 29, NO. 3–4 | MARCH-APRIL 2019 Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities Holes in the Bottom of the Sea: History, Revolutions, and Future Opportunities Suzanne OConnell, Professor of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT about plate tectonics, ocean chemistry, (Scripps Institution of Oceanography No other international scientific col- evolution, life in harsh environments, [SIO]) and Harry Hess (Princeton laboration has contributed as much to our and climate change. University), both AMSOC members, knowledge of Earth processes as scientific Scientists from across the world have proposed to drill a deep hole to sample ocean drilling (SOD). These contributions benefited from and contributed to the pro- Earth’s mantle below a zone of seismic include geophysical surveys, core sam- gram. Geophysical site survey data, cores, velocity change, the Mohorovicic ples, borehole well logs, and sub-seafloor and associated information are available to Discontinuity (Moho): “Project Mohole.” observatories. After more than half a the global scientific community to study The National Science Foundation (NSF) century, involving thousands of scientists and sample. More than 1000 international may have been in favor of the project, from around the world, SOD has been scientists, ranging in age from early career because the 1957 International Union of instrumental in developing three geosci- to retired, are proponents on active propos- Geodesy and Geophysics Resolution 11 ence revolutions: (1) plate tectonics, als for upcoming drilling. recommended that the Moho be drilled. (2) paleoceanography, and (3) the deep This article, by no means comprehen- The Soviet Union said they had the equip- marine biosphere. Without SOD, it is sive, highlights parts of the history and a ment and were looking for a place to drill unlikely that our current understanding few major discoveries of SOD. More (Bascom, 1961). They had just launched of Earth processes could have developed. complete histories are available in Ocean the Sputnik satellite. Their technological Building upon prior scientific results, Drilling: Accomplishments and Challenges advance alarmed many Americans the current science plan is guided by four (National Research Council, 2011), Earth and spurred investment in U.S. science interlinked themes: Planetary Dynamics, and Life Processes Discovered from and technology. Climate and Ocean Change, Biosphere Subseafloor Environments: A Decade of Despite the difficulties of SOD, Frontiers, and Earth in Motion. SOD has Science Achieved by the Integrated Ocean AMSOC, with NSF funding, took on the also been a leader in international collabo- Drilling Program (IODP) (Stein et al., challenge. Many technological improve- rations and the open sharing of samples, 2014), and Koppers et al. (2019). GSA Data ments were necessary for such a project: data, and information. Results from SOD Repository Table S1 (see footnote 1) a drilling platform that could hold station expeditions are open access and available provides URLs to detailed, preliminary in deep water and under different wave online. Almost 2.5 million samples have information for all SOD expeditions and and wind conditions (dynamic position- been taken from over 360 km of core legs, including co-chief scientists, sites ing), a way to retrieve cores through drill located in three repositories. Today about cored, and year. pipe so that the drill pipe could stay in half the members of scientific teams, place, and a sturdy drill bit that could including co-chief scientists, are women. HISTORY operate for days, even weeks. The first This program is needed in the future for drilling was accomplished in 1961 with the geoscientists to continue exploring our Pre-JOIDES (Joint Oceanographic barge, CUSS I (Continental, Union, Shell, planet to understand how it functions and Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling) and Superior). Unfortunately, after a prom- to create predictive models. SOD may be said to have originated ising start, organizational difficulties, and with the International Geophysical Year loss of political support, Project Mohole, INTRODUCTION (1957–1958), and an organization with the deemed too expensive, was abandoned in Scientific ocean drilling (SOD) cele- unlikely name American Miscellaneous 1966 (Hsü, 1992). brated its 50th birthday in 2018. As of Society (AMSOC). AMSOC included men December 2018, 283 expeditions (formerly at pivotal positions at oceanographic insti- The Glomar Challenger called legs) have been completed and tutions, oil companies, the Office of Naval Not everyone agreed that drilling a >1600 sites have been drilled (see Fig. S1 Research, and the United States Geological single deep hole in igneous rock was the in the GSA Data Repository1). These sites Survey. Bascom (1961) provides details best initial SOD research objective. In represent <0.0005% of the ocean floor, about AMSOC and the development of 1962, Cesare Emiliani (University of yet have provided essential information their discussions about SOD. Walter Munk Miami) proposed that a drilling vessel be GSA Today, v. 29, https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG380A.1. Copyright 2019, The Geological Society of America. CC-BY-NC. 1 GSA Data Repository item 2019051, Table S1 and Figures S1–S7, is available online at www.geosociety.org/datarepository/2019. deployed to core continuously through deep-sea sediment (project LOCO, LOng COres). Maurice Ewing (Columbia University, also a member of AMSOC) supported obtaining multiple long cores, stating, “The entire record of terrestrial conditions from the beginning of the ocean is there in the most undisturbed form it is possible to find anywhere—and the dream of my life is to punch that hole 2000 feet deep and bring the contents to the lab to study them” (Gray, 1956). Thus, simultaneously with Project Mohole, a different kind of program was planned. Five U.S. oceanographic institu- tions established JOIDES (Joint Ocean- ographic Institutions for Deep Earth Figure 1. Multichannel Seismic Line 1027 in Baltimore Canyon, used to locate the best sites (902, Sampling). In 1965, using dynamic posi- 904, and 906) during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 150 (Mountain et al., 1994). Cored intervals are tioning, fourteen holes were cored in the shown in white. Also shown are the locations of Deep Sea Drilling Project Site 612 (Leg 95) and the Continental Offshore Stratigraphic Test (COST) B-3 well. The COST B3 well was used to establish eastern Atlantic Ocean on board the first-order age and facies successions. These sediments were cored to establish a history of sea- Caldrill I. The results convinced the scien- level variations along the mid-Atlantic U.S. continental margin. Mission-specific drilling platform Expedition 313 continued the coring in modern water depths of 30–35 m and recovered nearshore tific community of the value of multiple and onshore sediments deposited during Neogene changes in global sea level. holes throughout the ocean. In 1967, Global Marine was contracted to design a ship expressly for the purpose of SOD. Seven days later, Leg 2 began coring The JOIDES Resolution With SIO as the prime contractor, the across the Atlantic. The scientific party of Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP), using eight included two female micropaleoen- Ocean Drilling Program (ODP, the Glomar Challenger, was launched tologists, Catherine Nigrini (SIO) and 1983–2003) (Bascom, 1961). Maria Bianca Cita (Instituto di Geologia, By the late 1970s, JOIDES began Universitá di Milano, Italy). This began a exploring alternative vessels. Major Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP, tradition of international participation improvements in heave compensation and 1968–1983) that was formalized in 1975: five coun- station-keeping ability offered better cores By 1968, several seminal papers on tries (Federal Republic of Germany, and an expansion of geographic areas that plate tectonics (e.g., Hess, 1962; Vine and France, Japan, the Soviet Union, and the could be explored. More research could be Matthews, 1963; Wilson, 1966) had been UK) became contributing international accomplished with expanded laboratories published. These papers were based on partners in the International Phase of and more scientists. The SEDCO/BP 471, sparse data, leaving many unconvinced. Ocean Drilling (IPOD). Today, 23 coun- an oil exploration vessel, was chosen, Interpretation of marine magnetic anoma- tries are part of the IODP consortium, highlighting the advances in technology lies (e.g., Pitman et al., 1968) and better and women comprise about half of the generated by the petroleum industry. earthquake data (e.g., Isacks et al., 1968) science team. Funding for the new program came from provided additional support for this the- Technological development continually the United States and member countries. ory. For many, final confirmation came improved drilling, coring, and logging. Texas A&M University was awarded the from SOD. In 1970, the first re-entry cone was contract. The SEDCO/BP 471 was con- As with Project Mohole, whose objec- deployed (Leg 15, Site 146, Venezuelan verted to a scientific drilling vessel, the tive was seismically defined, Leg 1 of the Basin), allowing the drill string to be JOIDES Resolution, and on 11 January Glomar Challenger and all subsequent pulled, a new bit attached, and coring in 1985 commenced operations. Unlike petro- expeditions have used seismic surveys to the same hole to continue. This enabled
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Continental Scientific Drilling U.S
    THE FUTURE OF CONTINENTAL SCIENTIFIC DRILLING U.S. PERSPECTIVE Proceedings of a workshop | June 4-5, 2009 | Denver, Colorado DOSECC WORKSHOP PUBLICATION 1 Front Cover: Basalts and rhyolites of the Snake River Plain at Twin Falls, Idaho. Project Hotspot will explore the interaction of the Yellowstone hotspot with the continental crust by sampling the volcanic rocks underlying the plain. Two 1.5 km holes will penetrate both the surficial basalt and the underlying rhyolite caldera-fill and outflow depos- its. A separate drill hole will explore the paleoclimate record in Pliocene Lake Idaho in the western Snake River Plain. In addition to the understanding of continent-mantle interaction that develops and the paleoclimate data collected, the project will study water-rock interaction, gases emanating from the deeper curst, and the geomicro- biology of the rocks of the plain. Once scientific objectives and set, budgets are developed, and funding is granted, successful implementation of projects requires careful planning, professional on-site staff, appropriate equip- ment, effective logistics, and accurate accounting. Photo by Tony Walton The authors gratefully acknowledge support of the National Science Foundation (NSF EAR 0923056 to The University of Kansas) and DOSECC, Inc. of Salt Lake City, Utah. Anthony W. Walton, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas Kenneth G. Miller, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. Christian Koeberl, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria John Shervais, Utah State University, Logan, Utah Steve Colman, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota edited by Cathy Evans. Stephen Hickman, US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California covers and design by mitch favrow. Will Clyde, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire document layout by Pam Lerow and Paula Courtney.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 8 - Mohorovičić’S Inversion: the Discovery of the Crust-Mantle Boundary A.K.A
    LECTURE 8 - Mohorovičić’s inversion: the discovery of the crust-mantle boundary a.k.a. “Moho” Hrvoje Tkalčić "Andrija Mohorovičić" by a surrealistic painter, Carlo Billich *** N.B. The material presented in these lectures is from the principal textbooks, other books on similar subject, the research and lectures of my colleagues from various universities around the world, my own research, and finally, numerous web sites. I am grateful for the material I used in this particular lecture to D. Skoko, M.Herak, and A. Mohorovičić himself, who was a founder of the Geophysical Institute of the University of Zagreb, at which I studied as an undergraduate student.*** Seismic “phases” and their nomenclature Construction of travel time curves (hodochrones) istance d Epicentral Time Observed and theoretical travel time curves Kennett et al., 1991 1909 Earthquake and the Mohorovičić’s assumption Mohorovičić’s method Mohorovičić’s method Mohorovičić’s method The depth of the discontinuity Voilà! Andrija Mohorovičić 1910 The discontinuity in seismic wave speeds Somewhat arbitrary v alues on this scheme, but generally OK Abrupt change in the composition and density of rocks results in a sharp change in seismic wave speeds The depth of Moho (crustal thickness) Moho in popular culture . The Mohorovičić Discontinuity is mentioned in one particular computer game, an RTS called Total Annihilation. Players can build a "Moho Mine" in order to mine metal at or close to the Mohorovičić Discontinuity. Due to the size of the structure, the public being unfamiliar with the Mohorovičić Discontinuity, and an expansion structure called the "Moho Metal-Maker", "Moho" is misinterpreted as meaning "big.” .
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Drilling Project, UCSD, SIO. Scientific Objectives And
    DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT UNIVERS ITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY Scientific Objectives and Highlights The goal of the original 18-month Deep Sea Drilling Project was to gather scientific information which would aid in the determination of the age and processes of development of the ocean basins in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The primary strategy to secure this information was to drill deep holes in the ocean floor, relying largely on technology already developed by the petroleum industry. Cores were collected and in-hole measurements of physical properties made. Cores from the ocean floor provide reference sections for future studies in biostratigraphy, physical stratigraphy, and paleomangetism and afford new studies of the physical and chemical aspects of sediment provenance, transportation, deposition and diagenesis. In-hole measurements provide petrophysical data which permit inference of lithology over intervals where no cores were secured. Scientific objectives for the three-year extension period were directed largely toward an understanding of the interac,tion of the continents and ocean basins and is beins prosecuted mainly in outer fringes of the ocean areas. or in places that are intermediate between oceanic and continental. Extension period drilling and coring has been done in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea and Caribbean Sea. It is continuing in the Pacific Ocean and the Indian Ocean. A preliminary description of core material is done initially by ship-board scientists during each of the 55-day cruises of the drilling research vessel, Glomar Challenger, and at several shore-base laboratories. Core samples and des­ criptions are then distributed for research purposes to qualified scientists through-out the world without regard to their affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mohole : a Crustal Journey and Mantle Quest
    The MoHole : a Crustal Journey and Mantle Quest BENOÎT ILDEFONSE CNRS, GÉOSCIENCES MONTPELLIER [email protected] Mission Moho co-proponents Natsue Abe, Peter Kelemen, Hidenori Kumagai, Damon Teagle, Doug Wilson, Gary Acton, Jeff Alt, Wolfgang Bach, Neil Banerjee, Mathilde Cannat, Rick Carlson, David Christie, Rosalind Coggon, Laurence Coogan, Robert Detrick, Henry Dick, Jeffrey Gee, Kathryn Gillis, Alistair Harding, Jeff Karson, Shuichi Kodaira, Juergen Koepke, John Maclennan, Jinichiro Maeda, Chris MacLeod, Jay Miller, Sumio Miyashita, Jim Natland, Toshio Nozaka, Mladen Nedimovic, Yasuhiko Ohara, Kyoko Okino, Philippe Pezard, Eiichi Takazawa, Takeshi Tsuji, Susumu Umino Co-authors of MoHole workshop report Natsue Abe, Yoshio Isozaki, Donna Blackman, Pablo Canales, Shuichi Kodaira, Greg Myers, Kentaro Nakamura, Mladen Nedimovic, Ali Skinner, Eiichi Takazawa, Damon Teagle, Masako Tominaga, Susumu Umino, Doug Wilson, Masaoki Yamao April 1958, meeting in the Great Hall of the NAS : “What good will it do to get a single sample of the mantle?...” “Perhaps it is true that we won't find out as much about the earth’s interior from one hole as we hope. To those who raise that objection I say, If there is not a first hole, there cannot be a second or a tenth or a hundredth hole. We must make a beginning.” Harry Hess Project “Mohole” 1957-1966 Life, April 14, 1961 Offshore Guadalupe Island March-April 1961 CUSS 1 Dynamic positioning ~ 3500 mbsl 5 holes Max depth 183 m, miocene sediments & ~ 14 m of basalt 40 years of planning on deep drilling of the ocean lithosphere Oceanic basement drilling 1968 - 2005 basalt (45 holes > 50 m) gabbro & serpentinite (37 holes > 10 m) Ildefonse et al., 2007 Not enough !! ~3% of DSDP/ODP/IODP cumulated depth No continuous section of ocean crust ! Scientific planning 2006-2010 • Mission Moho Workshop Formation and Evolution of Oceanic Lithosphere Portland, Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • IODP Deep Biosphere Research Workshop Report – a Synthesis of Recent Investigations, and Discussion of New Research Questions and Drilling Targets
    Workshop White Papers Sci. Dril., 17, 61–66, 2014 www.sci-dril.net/17/61/2014/ doi:10.5194/sd-17-61-2014 Scientific Drilling © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Open Access IODP Deep Biosphere Research Workshop report – a synthesis of recent investigations, and discussion of new research questions and drilling targets B. N. Orcutt1, D. E. LaRowe2, K. G. Lloyd3, H. Mills4, W. Orsi5, B. K. Reese6, J. Sauvage7, J. A. Huber8, and J. Amend2 1Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME 04544, USA 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA 3University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4University of Houston–Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA 5Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 6University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA 7Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragensett, RI 02882, USA 8Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Correspondence to: B. N. Orcutt ([email protected]) Received: 5 November 2013 – Revised: 30 December 2013 – Accepted: 7 February 2014 – Published: 29 April 2014 Abstract. During the past decade, the IODP (International Ocean Discovery Program) has fostered a sig- nificant increase in deep biosphere investigations in the marine sedimentary and crustal environments, and scientists are well-poised to continue this momentum into the next phase of the IODP. The goals of this work- shop were to evaluate recent findings in a global context, synthesize available biogeochemical data to foster thermodynamic and metabolic activity modeling and measurements, identify regional targets for future tar- geted sampling and dedicated expeditions, foster collaborations, and highlight the accomplishments of deep biosphere research within IODP.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review of "Exploring the Earth's Crust: History and Results of Controlled-Source Seismology (GSA Memoir 208)" by Claus Prodehl and Walter D
    Book Review of "Exploring the Earth's Crust: History and Results of Controlled-Source Seismology (GSA Memoir 208)" by Claus Prodehl and Walter D. Mooney Prodehl and Mooney have done an impressive service to the community in providing this compendium of controlled-source seismic studies of the earth's crust carried out to 2005. It is a remarkable piece of work. The book will be a valuable resource for students and researches in earth sciences for many years to come. The chapter on the "History of controlled-source seismology" provides an excellent introduction to the data sets and experiments that are discussed in the remainder of the book. It is strange that for such a large book there is no index and, as a result, it is awkward to find material of interest. Consequently this chapter is especially necessary. The chapter on "The first 100 years (1845-1945)" does for controlled-source seismology what Love's (1927) "Historical Introduction" did for the theory of elasticity and Dewey and Byerly (1969) did for seismometry. Given the importance and ubiquity of the term "Mohorovičić Discontinuity" it would be interesting to know who first used this term and how quickly it was generally accepted. This is not, however, addressed in Prodehl and Mooney other than to say "This boundary [reported by Mohorovičić (1910)] ... was shortly thereafter defined as the crust-mantle boundary and was named the Mohorovičić discontinuity...". (By the way, for those anglophones interested in the history of seismology there is an English translation of Mohorovičić 's 1910 paper (Mohorovičić 1992).) It is, of course, common knowledge that the crust is defined as the region of the earth above the Mohorovičić Discontinuity (or Moho) and that this is observed seismically from both earthquakes and controlled sources.
    [Show full text]
  • This Dynamic Earth [USGS]
    Continental drift was hotly debated off and on for decades following Wegener's death before it was largely dismissed as being eccentric, preposterous, and improbable. However, beginning in the 1950s, a wealth of new evidence emerged to revive the debate about Wegener's provocative ideas and their implications. In particular, four major scientific developments spurred the formulation of the plate-tectonics theory: (1) demonstration of the ruggedness and youth of the ocean floor; (2) confirmation of repeated reversals of the Earth magnetic field in the geologic past; (3) emergence of the seafloor-spreading hypothesis and associated recycling of oceanic crust; and (4) precise documentation that the world's earthquake and volcanic activity is concentrated along oceanic trenches and submarine mountain ranges. Ocean floor mapping About two thirds of the Earth's surface lies beneath the oceans. Before the 19th century, the depths of the open ocean were largely a matter of speculation, and most people thought that the ocean floor was relatively flat and featureless. However, as early as the 16th century, a few intrepid navigators, by taking soundings with hand lines, found that the open ocean can differ considerably in depth, showing that the ocean floor was not as flat as generally believed. Oceanic exploration during the next centuries dramatically improved our knowledge of the ocean floor. We now know that most of the geologic processes occurring on land are linked, directly or indirectly, to the dynamics of the ocean floor. "Modern" measurements of ocean depths greatly increased in the 19th century, when deep-sea line soundings (bathymetric surveys) were routinely made in the Atlantic and Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT MOHOLE INITIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY for 2017 DRILLING Prepared for Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
    PROJECT MOHOLE INITIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR 2017 DRILLING Prepared For Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Final Report Project No. IOD-I211-001 Version No.: 5 Date: June 30, 2011 Purpose: The purpose of this document is to provide a feasibility study for drilling and coring activities that will take place in ultra-deepwater environment of th Pacific Ocean and also in very high temperature igneous rocks constituting 2600 Network Blvd, Suite 550 Frisco, Texas 75034 the oceanic crust in order to reach the upper mantle. 1-972-712-8407 Some of the topics discussed include: 1. Drilling with riser in 4000 meters water depths. 16225 Park Ten Place, Suite 450 Houston, Texas 77084 2. Drilling and coring 150°C-250°C igneous rocks. 1-281-206-2000 3. Reaching the upper mantle at 6000-7000 meters below the ocean seafloor. www.blade-energy.com 4. Well design for the 3 potential drill sites. 5. Operational time and costs estimation for the 3 potential drill sites. Blade Energy Partners Limited, and its affiliates (‘Blade’) provide our services subject to our General Terms and Conditions (‘GTC’) in effect at time of service, unless a GTC provision is expressly superseded in a separate agreement made with Blade. Blade’s work product is based on information sources which we believe to be reliable, including information that was publicly available and that was provided by our client; but Blade does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. All statements are the opinions of Blade based on generally-accepted and reasonable practices in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • This Dynamic Earth in January of 1992
    View of the planet Earth from the Apollo spacecraft. The Red Sea, which separates Saudi Arabia from the continent of Africa, is clearly visible at the top. (Photograph courtesy of NASA.) Contents Preface Historical perspective Developing the theory Understanding plate motions "Hotspots": Mantle Some unanswered questions Plate tectonics and people Endnotes thermal plumes 1 of 77 2002-01-01 11:52 This pdf-version was edited by Peter Lindeberg in December 2001. Any deviation from the original text is non-intentional. This book was originally published in paper form in February 1996 (design and coordination by Martha Kiger; illustrations and production by Jane Russell). It is for sale for $7 from: U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop SSOP Washington, DC 20402-9328 or it can be ordered directly from the U.S. Geological Survey: Call toll-free 1-888-ASK-USGS Or write to USGS Information Services Box 25286, Building 810 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 303-202-4700; Fax 303-202-4693 ISBN 0-16-048220-8 Version 1.08 The online edition contains all text from the original book in its entirety. Some figures have been modified to enhance legibility at screen resolutions. Many of the images in this book are available in high resolution from the USGS Media for Science page. USGS Home Page URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/dynamic.html Last updated: 01.29.01 Contact: [email protected] 2 of 77 2002-01-01 11:52 In the early 1960s, the emergence of the theory of plate tectonics started a revolution in the earth sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thrill to Drill
    INTERNATIONAL CONTINENTAL SCIENTIFIC DRILLING PROGRAM The Thrill to Drill After more than two decades of International Continental Scientific Drilling: A prospect for the future As most of the Earth under our feet is inaccessible, drilling is the only ground truth to correct our models and ideas about our planet's interior. Drilling does not necessarily have to be done from the surface. Here, researchers follow the drilling progress while drilling boreholes in the Moab Khotsong gold mine (South Africa) in 3 kilometers depth. The project drilled several boreholes into and around seismogenic zones to study the rupture details and scaling of small and larger earthquakes. 2 The International Continental Scientific Drilling Program – an introduction For most people, drilling into the Earth means laying the foundation for extracting natural resources from under our feet. Indeed the vast majority of all drill rigs in the world are used either for establishing water wells or for the discovery and exploitation of mineral resources or hydrocarbons like oil and gas. There is, however, another aspect of drill- ing into the Earth’s crust of which only very few people are aware. Poking a hole into the skin of our planet can help sci- entists solve some of the many mysteries which remain hidden in its vast interior. During the past one and a half centu- ries geoscientists have made enormous strides in exploring the interior of the Earth indirectly by analyzing the chem- ical composition of lava from hundreds of volcanoes or by modeling the physical conditions at depth based on the inter- pretation of seismic waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Mohole Deep Sea Drilling Project Ocean Drilling Program
    A Brief History of Scientific Ocean Drilling Deep Sea Drilling Project Ocean Drilling Project Mohole Program Drilling for Science Scientists have been using drilling technology to understand Earth’s history since 1958. – Project Mohole (1958 -1966) – Deep Sea Drilling Project (1968 -1983) – Ocean Drilling Program (1985 - 2003) – Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (2003 - ) Project Mohole •Project Mohole attempted to drill through the Earth’s crust to the Mohorovicic Discontinuity and retrieve a sample of the mantle. •Recovered the first sample of oceanic crust. •Although the mantle was never reached, Project Mohole showed that deep ocean drilling was a viable means of obtaining geological samples. Deep Sea Drilling Project 1968-1983 During worldwide operations, the Glomar Challenger sailed 96 Legs and drilled 624 sites. DSDP Scientific Highlights • Verified the theory of plate tectonics; • Discovered that Antarctica has been ice-covered for 20 million years; • Showed that the Mediterranean Sea completely dried up between 5 and 12 Ma. Ocean Drilling Program 1985-2003 • During ODP, the JOIDES Resolution sailed 110 Legs and drilled 650 sites ODP Scientific Highlights •Defining the longest record of Earth’s natural climate variability; •Collecting the first marine record of the K/T boundary; •Sampling gas hydrates How is IODP different? Multiple Drilling Platforms Riser Platform Mission-Specific Non-riser Platform Chikyu Riser Platform • Operated by Japan’s JAMSTEC Center for Deep Earth Exploration (CDEX) • Scheduled to begin IODP operations in 2007 • 12,000 m drillstring with 2500 m riser capability IODP - Multiple Drilling Platforms • Riserless drilling vessel • Riser-equipped drilling vessel • Mission specific platforms Riser versus Non-Riser: What’s the difference? 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 ( Pressure Gradient by Specific Gravity ) Riserless Drilling Riser Drilling Riser Pipe and BOP Hydrostatic Pressure of 3500m Fluid Column of which SG is 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Drilling Project Initial Reports Volume 39
    46. GENERAL SYNTHESIS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH ATLANTIC DRILLING RESULTS, LEG 39, DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT Peter R. Supko,1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California and Katharina Perch-Nielsen, Eidg. Techniche Hochschule, Zurich, Switzerland INTRODUCTION shows the location of pertinent sites drilled on Legs 3, 36, 40, and 41. Leg 39 drill sites were selected to address several partially interrelated geologic problems. The Vema HIATUSES Fracture Zone (Site 353) was drilled in an attempt to That the sediment record of ocean basins is not recover igneous rocks of crustal Layer 3 in an area continuous at all locations was recognized from the where these deeper rocks might be exposed at drillable earliest DSDP results, and it soon became apparent depths as a result of fracture zone tectonics (Bonatti, that regional temporal and spatial trends existed (e.g., 1971). The crest portion of the Ceará Rise (Site 354) Moore, 1972). The regional importance of Atlantic was drilled to detail its sedimentation history, to obtain hiatuses was noted by Pimm and Hayes (1972), whose as complete a low-latitude biostratigraphic section as compilation of Leg 14 and earlier data indicated that possible, and to determine the nature of basement much of the Tertiary section was missing at many sites. under this physiographic and structural high in the They further noted that the hiatuses represented longer Guiana Basin. Sites 355 and 358 were drilled to date time spans in the western portion of the basin, implying oceanic magnetic anomalies and to detail the current control by eroding westward-intensified sedimentation histories of deepwater locations in the thermohaline currents.
    [Show full text]