DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impacts of a Stem Boring Weevil, Mecinus Janthinus, on Dalmatian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impacts of a Stem Boring Weevil, Mecinus Janthinus, on Dalmatian THE IMPACTS OF A STEM BORING WEEVIL, MECINUS JANTHINUS , ON DALMATIAN TOADFLAX, LINARIA DALMATICA by Marjolein Schat A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana December 2008 ©COPYRIGHT by Marjolein Schat 2008 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a dissertation submitted by Marjolein Schat This dissertation has been read by each member of the dissertation committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citation, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Robert K.D. Peterson Fabian Menalled Approved for the Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Bruce D. Maxwell Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. I further agree that copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for extensive copying or reproduction of this dissertation should be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, to whom I have granted “the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my dissertation in and from microform along with the non- exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my abstract in any format in whole or in part.” Marjolein Schat December 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would never have embarked on this journey without the example and encouragement provided by my father, K.A. Schat. Nor would I have been able to complete the process without the many forms of support he and my step-mother, L. Stenzler, provided along the way. I owe this degree in large part to them. I have also benefitted from the strength and encouragement of many other people far too numerous to list. In particular I would like to thank D.G.P. for talking me through the rough parts of getting started and surviving my comps, B.C. for helping me “get out of my head” by providing much needed moments of respite during the latter half my program, and R.M. and R.H. for being there to talk to on those lonely evenings and weekends in the office. This project was funded by the Montana Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Trust Fund and additional support came from the Bozeman USFS Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Montana State University, and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. I could not have completed this work without the help of my many field assistants and fellow CoBRA members. Finally, but by no means least importantly, I would like to thank my committee (Robert K.D. Peterson, Fabian Menalled, David Weaver, Sharlene Sing, and Jim Jacobs) for their thoughtful insights and help at all stages of my project. Every committee member contributed valuable components to this dissertation. v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 Invasion Theory ..............................................................................................................1 Classical Biological Control ...........................................................................................7 Stages of a Classical Weed Biological Control Program ...........................................8 Choosing a Target Weed ...................................................................................... 9 Choosing Biological Control Agents .................................................................... 9 Biocontrol Agent Establishment ......................................................................... 10 Increase and Spread of Biocontrol Agents ......................................................... 11 Suppression of Target Weed .............................................................................. 11 Stability of Control and Ecosystem Restoration ................................................ 13 Concerns About Biological Control .........................................................................13 Impacts of Insects on Plants ..........................................................................................15 Photosynthesis. .........................................................................................................15 Impact of Insects on Plant Primary Physiology .......................................................18 Resource Allocation .................................................................................................21 Study Organisms ...........................................................................................................25 Linaria dalmatica .....................................................................................................25 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................... 25 Introduction and Distribution in North America ................................................ 27 Description ......................................................................................................... 28 Life Cycle ........................................................................................................... 29 Factors Limiting Growth .................................................................................... 31 Control. ............................................................................................................... 31 Fire and Linaria dalmatica . ................................................................................ 32 Mecinus janthinus ....................................................................................................33 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................... 33 European Distribution ........................................................................................ 34 Life History ........................................................................................................ 34 Mortality Factors ................................................................................................ 35 Mecinus janthinus as a Biocontrol Agent ........................................................... 36 Other Dalmatian Toadflax Biocontrol Agents .........................................................39 Objectives ......................................................................................................................39 2. IMPACT OF MECINUS JANTHINUS LARVAL AND ADULT INJURY ON GROWTH AND PRIMARY PHYSIOLOGY OF LINARIA DALMATICA UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS ...................................................................................41 Abstract .........................................................................................................................41 Introduction ...................................................................................................................42 Study Organisms ...........................................................................................................44 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................45 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Irrigation ...................................................................................................................46 Plants ........................................................................................................................46 Treatments and Treatment Application ....................................................................48 Harvests ....................................................................................................................49 Growth and Biomass Measurements ........................................................................49 Gas Exchange and Fluorescence Measurements ......................................................50 Data Analysis ...........................................................................................................51 Results ...........................................................................................................................54 Adult Density and Injury ..........................................................................................54 Plant Growth and Biomass .......................................................................................55 Biomass Ratios .........................................................................................................56 Allometric Analyses .................................................................................................57 Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence ..........................................................59 Discussion .....................................................................................................................60 3. IMPACT OF MECINUS JANTHINUS INJURY ON GROWTH AND PRIMARY PHYSIOLOGY OF LINARIA DALMATICA IN THE FIELD ......................................80 Abstract .........................................................................................................................80 Introduction ...................................................................................................................81
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of a State Insectary in Weed Biocontrol
    The Role of a State Insectary in Weed Biocontrol Dan Bean, Director Palisade Insectary Colorado Department of Agriculture Conservation Services Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Plant Industry Brands Inspection and Consumer Services Conservation Services Markets State Fair Animal Industries Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Conservation Districts Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Groundwater Conservation Districts Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Noxious Weeds Groundwater Conservation Districts Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Biological Pest Control Noxious Weeds Groundwater Conservation Districts Commissioner’s Office 7 Divisions Conservation Services 4 Programs Biological Pest Control Palisade Insectary Palisade, Colorado Palisade Insectary . Began in the 1940’s to fight Oriental fruit moth, a project that helped peach farmers and is still going . Moved to new 14,000 sq ft facility in 1992 . Distributes over 30 biocontrol agents for the control of insect pests and weeds . Is a partner in pest management on a local, state, tribal and federal level The Program mission is to provide biological control agents and expertise to the citizens of Colorado in order to assist in achieving their land and resource management objectives Leafy spurge infestation near Pine, CO Eric Lane, Director
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Curculioninae) of Iran: Eleven Species Recorded for the First Time, with New Data on Host Plants and Distribution of Several Species
    Journal of Entomological S ociety of Iran 57 2 015, 35(1): 57-68 Tychiini and Mecinini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Curculioninae) of Iran: eleven species recorded for the first time, with new data on host plants and distribution of several species R. Gholami Ghavam Abad1&*, S. E. Sadeghi1, H. Ghajarieh2, H. Nasserzadeh3, H. Yarmand1, V. R. Moniri1, M. Nikdel4, A. R. Haghshenas5, Z. Hashemi Khabir6, A. Salahi Ardekani7, A. Mohammadpour8 and R. Caldara9 1. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Exiension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, P. O. Box 13185- 116, Iran, 2. Department of Plant Protection, Aburayhan Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, 3. Department of Insect Taxonomy, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection Research, Tehran, P. O. Box 1454 Iran, 4. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of East Azarbaijan, Tabriz, Iran, 5. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran, 6. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of West Azarbaijan, Urumiyeh, Iran, 7. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Kohkiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad, Yasuj, Iran, 8. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Qom, Iran, 9. Center of Alpine Entomology, University of Milan, Italy. *Corresponding author, E-mail:[email protected] Abstract A faunistic study on the tribes Tychiini and Mecinini (Curculionidae, Curculioninae) was carried out during the years 2010-2013 in different ecological regions of Iran. Twenty nine species belonging to the genera Mecinus Germar, 1821, Gymnetron Schoenherr, 1825, Rhinusa Stephens, 1829, Cleopomiarus Pierce, 1919, Tychius Germar, 1817 and Sibinia Germar, 1817 were collected. Localities and ecological notes on each species are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Toadflax Stem Miners and Gallers: the Original Weed Whackers
    May/June 2014 • ISSUE 11 Toadflax Stem Miners and Gallers: The Original Weed Whackers THE TROUBLE WITH TOADFLAX However, ask rangeland managers and SUMMARY researchers throughout the Intermountain A field of flowering toadflax might West, and they will tell you that there Dalmatian and yellow toadflax are seem picturesque to the casual observer. is nothing beautiful about a field of aesthetically pleasing weeds wreaking The aesthetic appeal of Dalmatian and toadflax. Significant problems lurk below yellow toadflax’s showy, snapdragon-like havoc in rangelands across the western the superficial beauty. Sharlene E. Sing, blossoms might help explain why these United States. These non-native forbs a USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain species have spread across thousands of spread rapidly into fields following Research Station (RMRS) research acres of rangelands and meadows in the entomologist located in Bozeman, fire, tilling, construction, or other United States. These toadflax species are Montana, where much of RMRS’s disturbances. They are successful and affectionately referred to as butter and biocontrol research is located, concurs: stubborn invaders, producing massive eggs, Jacob’s ladder, or wild snapdragon, “Dalmatian and yellow toadflax number quantities of seeds each year and rapidly and share the visual appeal of closely among the most challenging invasive related ornamentals such as foxglove, re-sprouting from root fragments. weeds to manage in the Intermountain snapdragon, and penstemon. Eight non-native toadflax feeding West.” insect species have been intentionally released or accidentally introduced in North America. Stem mining weevils, Mecinus spp., serve as particularly powerful “weed whackers” against toadflax. Biological control of toadflax is complicated by the existence of two Mecinus species—each of which performs better on different toadflax species—and the appearance of competitively superior hybrids of yellow and Dalmatian toadflax.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudotsuga Menziesii
    SPECIAL PUBLICATION 4 SEPTEMBER 1982 INVERTEBRATES OF THE H.J. ANDREWS EXPERIMENTAL FOREST, WESTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, OREGON: A SURVEY OF ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CANOPY OF OLD-GROWTH Pseudotsuga Menziesii D.J. Voegtlin FORUT REJEARCH LABORATORY SCHOOL OF FORESTRY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Since 1941, the Forest Research Laboratory--part of the School of Forestry at Oregon State University in Corvallis-- has been studying forests and why they are like they are. A staff or more than 50 scientists conducts research to provide information for wise public and private decisions on managing and using Oregons forest resources and operating its wood-using industries. Because of this research, Oregons forests now yield more in the way of wood products, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Wood products are harvested, processed, and used more efficiently. Employment, productivity, and profitability in industries dependent on forests also have been strengthened. And this research has helped Oregon to maintain a quality environment for its people. Much research is done in the Laboratorys facilities on the campus. But field experiments in forest genetics, young- growth management, forest hydrology, harvesting methods, and reforestation are conducted on 12,000 acres of School forests adjacent to the campus and on lands of public and private cooperating agencies throughout the Pacific Northwest. With these publications, the Forest Research Laboratory supplies the results of its research to forest land owners and managers, to manufacturers and users of forest products, to leaders of government and industry, and to the general public. The Author David J. Voegtlin is Assistant Taxonomist at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7.10 Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 Jetzt Beschriebenen Palaearctischen Ceuthor- Rhynchinen
    Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 305 Schultze, A. (1902): Kritisches Verzeichniss der bis 3.7.10 Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 jetzt beschriebenen palaearctischen Ceuthor- rhynchinen. – Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift Roberto Caldara , Nico M. Franz, and Rolf 1902: 193 – 226. G. Oberprieler Schwarz, E. A. (1894): A “ parasitic ” scolytid. – Pro- ceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 3: Distribution. The subfamily as here composed (see 15 – 17. Phylogeny and Taxonomy below) includes approx- Scudder, S. H. (1893): Tertiary Rhynchophorous Coleo- ptera of the United States. xii + 206 pp. US Geological imately 350 genera and 4500 species (O ’ Brien & Survey, Washington, DC. Wibmer 1978; Thompson 1992; Alonso-Zarazaga Stierlin, G. (1886): Fauna insectorum Helvetiae. Coleo- & Lyal 1999; Oberprieler et al. 2007), provisionally ptera helvetiae , Volume 2. 662 pp. Rothermel & Cie., divided into 34 tribes. These are geographically Schaffhausen. generally restricted to a lesser or larger degree, only Thompson, R. T. (1973): Preliminary studies on the two – Curculionini and Rhamphini – being virtually taxonomy and distribution of the melon weevil, cosmopolitan in distribution and Anthonomini , Acythopeus curvirostris (Boheman) (including Baris and Tychiini only absent from the Australo-Pacifi c granulipennis (Tournier)) (Coleoptera, Curculion- region. Acalyptini , Cionini , Ellescini , Mecinini , idae). – Bulletin of Entomological Research 63: 31 – 48. and Smicronychini occur mainly in the Old World, – (1992): Observations on the morphology and clas- from Africa to the Palaearctic and Oriental regions, sifi cation of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) with Ellescini, Acalyptini, and Smicronychini also with a key to major groups. – Journal of Natural His- extending into the Nearctic region and at least tory 26: 835 – 891. the latter two also into the Australian one.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Curculionidae (Except Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in Latvian Fauna, Taxonomical Structure, Biogeography and Forecasted Species
    Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 12 (4) 2012 ISSN 1407 - 8953 CURCULIONIDAE (EXCEPT SCOLYTINAE AND PLATYPODINAE) IN LATVIAN FAUNA, TAXONOMICAL STRUCTURE, BIOGEOGRAPHY AND FORECASTED SPECIES Maksims Balalaikins Balalaikins M. 2012. Curculionidae (except Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in Latvian fauna, taxonomical structure, biogeography and forecasted species. Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 12 (4): 67 – 83. This paper presents analysis of taxonomical structure of Latvian Curculionidae (except Scolytinae and Platypodinae) and comparison with the neighboring countries (Lithuania and Estonia) weevil’s fauna. Range of chorotypes and biogeography analysis of Latvian Curculionidae (except Scolytinae and Platypodinae) is presented in current paper. List of forecasted weevils species of Latvian fauna is compilled. Key words: Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Latvia, fauna, taxonomical structure, chorotypes, forecasted species. Maksims Balalaikins Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Vienības 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The current paper is a continuation of studies on the Latvian fauna of Curculionidae (Balalaikins Worldwide, the Curculionidae is one of the largest 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, in families of the order Coleoptera, represented by press; Balalaikins & Bukejs 2009, 2010, 2011a, 4600 genera and 51000 species (Alonso-Zarazaga 2011b, 2012), Balalaikins & Telnov 2012. The and Lyal 1999, Oberprieler et al. 2007). This aim of this work is to summarize and analyse family
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Biological Control of Dalmatian and Y Ellow T Oadflax
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF DALMATIAN AND Y ELLOW T OADFLAX LINDA M. WILSON, SHARLENE E. SING, GARY L. PIPER, RICHARD W. H ANSEN, ROSEMARIE DE CLERCK-FLOATE, DANIEL K. MACKINNON, AND CAROL BELL RANDALL Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown FHTET-2005-13 U.S. Department Forest September 2005 of Agriculture Service he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Toadflax (UGA1416053)—Linda Wilson, Beetles (UGA14160033-top, UGA1416054-bottom)—Bob Richard All photographs in this publication can be accessed and viewed on-line at www.forestryimages.org, sponsored by the University of Georgia. You will find reference codes (UGA000000) in the captions for each figure in this publication. To access them, point your browser at http://www.forestryimages.org, and enter the reference code at the search prompt. How to cite this publication: Wilson, L. M., S. E. Sing, G. L. Piper, R. W. Hansen, R. De Clerck- Floate, D. K. MacKinnon, and C. Randall. 2005. Biology and Biological Control of Dalmatian and Yellow Toadflax. USDA Forest Service, FHTET-05-13. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugs and Diseases Newsletter December 2015
    Vol. 26 No. 3 December 2015 It’s the Thought That Counts... It’s the time of year to look forward to spending time with family and showing each other how much we care by giving the perfect gift. This isn’t limited to just humans though, insects exhibit this kind of behaviour too! Family time in ambrosia beetles: The majority of ambrosia beetle species tunnel Alberta’s eye into the heartwood of weakened trees, where they cultivate fungus as a food source. Like termites, bees, and ants, many ambrosia beetles are eusocial; they on forest live in colonies with many individuals and overlapping generations. Just like health human families, every individual in the colony has their job. The brood are respon- sible for enlarging the gallery and sweeping up the poop (frass). Adults protect the brood and shuffle the frass balls out of the gallery, while everyone helps take care Issue highlights: of the fungus garden. And as with many human families, the mother runs things: The matriarch of the ambrosia beetle colony is the sole egg-layer, while the other Insect Gifting 1 females care for the offspring. Once the colony is thriving, subordinate females strike out on their own to start their own colonies and become matriarchs in their What’s the BUZZ— 2 Moth of the Mtns own right. Gypsy Moth Detec- 3 Gift-giving in dance flies: Insects are some of the best gift-givers because they tion in NE AB give such a wide variety of gifts in many different ways. But here’s where it gets a bit racythese are usually nuptial gifts; gifts that male insects give to females Spruce Beetle Update 5 in RMH Area during courtship and mating, often to convince the female that he’s Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Top 124 Terrestrial Invasive Plants and Pests
    Photo by RichardhdWebbWebb 0LQQHVRWD V7RS 7HUUHVWULDO,QYDVLYH 3ODQWVDQG3HVWV 3ULRULWLHVIRU5HVHDUFK Sciencebased solutions to protect Minnesota’s prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Prioritization Panel members ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Seventeen criteria, and their relative importance, to assess the threat a terrestrial invasive species poses to Minnesota ...................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive insects ................................................................................. 6 V. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive plant pathogens .................................................................. 7 VI. Prioritized list of plants (weeds) ................................................................................................... 8 VII. Terrestrial invasive insects (alphabetically by common name): criteria ratings to determine threat to Minnesota. .................................................................................................................................... 9 VIII. Terrestrial invasive pathogens (alphabetically by disease among bacteria, fungi, nematodes, oomycetes, parasitic plants, and viruses): criteria ratings
    [Show full text]