DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern River/Forrestdale/ Brookdale/Wungong D ISTRICT S TRUCTURE P LAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern River/Forrestdale/ Brookdale/Wungong D ISTRICT S TRUCTURE P LAN JANUARY 2001 Southern River/Forrestdale/ Brookdale/Wungong D ISTRICT S TRUCTURE P LAN VERNM O EN G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R RN AUST Dlsclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that the Ministry for Planning, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person from any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement, or advice referred to in this document. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission Albert Facey House 469 Wellington Street Perth, Western Australia 6000 Published January 2001 ISBN 0 7309 9258 6 Internet: http://www.wa.gov.au/planning E-mail: [email protected] Tel: (08) 9264 7777 Fax: (08) 9264 7566 TTY: (08) 9264 7535 Infoline: 1800 626 477 Copies of this document are available in alternative formats on application to the Disabilities Services Coordinator The Ministry for Planning owns all photography in this document unless otherwise stated. SOUTHERN RIVER/FORRESTDALE/BROOKDALE/WUNGONG DISTRICT STRUCTURE PLAN Foreword The Southern River, Forrestdale, Brookdale, Wungong area is complex to plan for future development. It is affected by issues such as a high water table, contaminated sites, uses which have offsite impacts such as poultry farms and kennels, major infrastructure installations such as power lines, gas and water mains, important conservation and environmental sites and land fragmentation. To address these issues comprehensively, the Western Australian Planning Commission has prepared the Southern River/Forrestdale/Brookdale/Wungong District Structure Plan in consultation with the Cities of Gosnells and Armadale and other key stakeholders. The primary purpose of the District Structure Plan is to provide a broad framework for land use and development including major community facilities, conservation areas, Bush Forever sites, open space, and potential areas for development. Extensive research and consultation has ensured that the complex array of issues has been addressed and a balanced approach to conservation of the environment and development is provided. Completion of the District Structure Plan is a significant step in the planning process for the area and paves the way for a coordinated approach to planning in the future. Key steps to follow include the preparation of an urban water management strategy, amendments to the Metropolitan Region Scheme, outline development plans, amendments to local government town planning schemes, and detailed subdivision design. The principles contained within the District Structure Plan provide a framework for these more detailed stages of planning. I commend the District Structure Plan to you and feel certain that it will provide an excellent guide to planning in the study area. HON GRAHAM KIERATH MLA Minister for Planning i SOUTHERN RIVER/FORRESTDALE/BROOKDALE/WUNGONG DISTRICT STRUCTURE PLAN ii SOUTHERN RIVER/FORRESTDALE/BROOKDALE/WUNGONG DISTRICT STRUCTURE PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................xvi 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................................1 1.2 Need for a District Structure Plan ...........................................................................................1 1.3 Type of District Structure Plan ................................................................................................1 1.4 Process for Adopting the Preferred District Structure Plan ....................................................2 1.5 Area Covered by the Plan........................................................................................................4 1.6 Function of the District Structure Plan...................................................................................4 1.7 Aims and Objectives................................................................................................................4 1.8 Structure of this Document.....................................................................................................6 1.9 Timing ....................................................................................................................................6 1.10 Using this District Structure Plan............................................................................................6 2. Previous Reports and Studies 2.1 Planning Structure for the South-East Corridor – Stage A (1978) ..........................................9 2.2 Planning for the Future of the Perth Metropolitan Region (1987)........................................9 2.3 Metroplan and the Urban Expansion Policy Statement (1990) ...........................................13 2.4 Previous Structure Planning for Southern River...................................................................15 2.5 Previous Structure Planning for Forrestdale (North of Forrest/Armadale Road)..................19 2.6 Previous Structure Planning in the Forrestdale-Brookdale Area (South of Forrest/Armadale Roads) .......................................................................................19 2.7 South-East Corridor Structure Plan (June 1996) ...................................................................20 2.8 Liveable Neighbourhoods Community Design Code (1997) ...............................................20 2.9 Bush Forever (2000)...............................................................................................................20 3. Existing Conditions 3.1 Physical Characteristics (General).........................................................................................23 3.1.1 Climate......................................................................................................................23 3.1.2 Landform/Topography .............................................................................................23 3.1.3 Soil Characteristics/Land Capability ........................................................................23 3.1.4 Land Capability........................................................................................................26 3.2 Drainage and Groundwater (Existing Description) ..............................................................26 3.2.1 Surface Hydrology ....................................................................................................26 3.2.2 Groundwater.............................................................................................................28 3.3 Environmental Resources ......................................................................................................28 3.3.1 Remnant Vegetation .................................................................................................28 3.3.2 Fauna.........................................................................................................................29 3.3.3 Groundwater Resources – Protection .......................................................................29 3.3.4 Wetlands ...................................................................................................................29 3.3.5 Insect Nuisance.........................................................................................................30 3.3.6 Existing Conservation Policy Areas (System 6 – EPP)..............................................32 3.3.7 The Middle Canning Catchment Water Resources Management Study (Stage 2 September 1996) .........................................................................................35 3.4 Land Use ................................................................................................................................36 3.4.1 General Land Use Description .................................................................................36 3.4.2 Land Uses – Potential Impact on Extent and Type of Development ......................37 iii SOUTHERN RIVER/FORRESTDALE/BROOKDALE/WUNGONG DISTRICT STRUCTURE PLAN Table of Contents 3.5 Infrastructure .........................................................................................................................40 3.5.1 Roads.........................................................................................................................40 3.5.2 Rail ............................................................................................................................40 3.5.3 Water Supply.............................................................................................................41 3.5.4 Swerage Reticulation.................................................................................................41 3.5.5 Wastewater treatment...............................................................................................41 3.5.6 Power ........................................................................................................................41
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Priorities for Western Australia April 2013 Keeping Western Australians on the Move
    Federal priorities for Western Australia April 2013 Keeping Western Australians on the move. Federal priorities for Western Australia Western Australia’s rapid population growth coupled with its strongly performing economy is creating significant challenges and pressures for the State and its people. Nowhere is this more obvious than on the State’s road and public transport networks. Kununurra In March 2013 the RAC released its modelling of projected growth in motor vehicle registrations which revealed that an additional one million motorised vehicles could be on Western Australia’s roads by the end of this decade. This growth, combined with significant developments in Derby and around the Perth CBD, is placing increasing strain on an already Great Northern Hwy Broome Fitzroy Crossing over-stretched transport network. Halls Creek The continued prosperity of regional Western Australia, primarily driven by the resources sector, has highlighted that the existing Wickham roads do not support the current Dampier Port Hedland or future resources, Karratha tourism and economic growth, both in terms Exmouth of road safety and Tom Price handling increased Great Northern Highway - Coral Bay traffic volumes. Parabardoo Newman Muchea and Wubin North West Coastal Highway East Bullsbrook Minilya to Barradale The RAC, as the Perth Darwin National Highway representative of Great Eastern Mitchell Freeway extension Ellenbrook more than 750,000 Carnarvon Highway: Bilgoman Tonkin Highway Grade Separations Road Mann Street members, North West Coastal Hwy Mundaring Light Rail PERTH believes that a Denham Airport Rail Link strong argument Goldfields Hwy Fremantle exists for Western Australia to receive Tonkin Highway an increased share Kalbarri Leinster Extension of Federal funding Kwinana 0 20 Rockingham Kilometres for road and public Geraldton transport projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Budget Statements Part 9 Transport
    Part 9 Transport Introduction The Transport portfolio delivers an accessible, reliable and safe transport system across all modes of transport, including road, rail, bus, ferry, freight, shipping, boating, cycling and active transport. It ensures an integrated transport network that facilitates economic and regional development, and focuses on long-term planning and investment in transport infrastructure for the State’s future. The portfolio is contributing to the achievement of the following Our Priorities and associated targets: • A Strong Economy − creating jobs; • A Liveable Environment − building METRONET and increasing housing opportunities nearby; and • Regional Prosperity − delivering strong regional economies. Summary of Recurrent and Asset Investment Expenditure 2018-19 2019-20 Estimated Budget Agency Actual Estimate $’000 $’000 Transport − Total Cost of Services ........................................................................................... 444,257 554,997 − Asset Investment Program .................................................................................... 35,873 38,284 Commissioner of Main Roads − Total Cost of Services ........................................................................................... 1,346,728 1,489,935 − Asset Investment Program .................................................................................... 1,222,169 1,265,111 Public Transport Authority of Western Australia − Total Cost of Services ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Process for Building and Upgrading Roads in Western Australia And; Roads in the Southern River Electorate
    Arteries of Life: The Complete Process for Building and Upgrading Roads in Western Australia and; Roads in the Southern River Electorate By Gary Payne Prepared for Peter Abetz Executive Summary The purpose of this report was to examine the process for building and upgrading roads in Metropolitan Western Australia, and to review previous road projects in the Southern River Electorate on certain roads. Research for this report included a review of current literature from a number of sources, as well as two interviews of key persons in the road building industry and a number of email inquiries to road building authorities. In Part A, all of these findings have been organised into a road building process. The initial idea for a road project can come from a great many sources, but these are often confined to government and intergovernmental bodies. A road is legally planned by an amendment of the Metropolitan Regional Planning scheme, and Local Planning Schemes. The process for amending the schemes differ with the size of a road project. But a project needs to be funded if it is to become reality. There are processes in place to ensure that money is redistributed from those people who use the system, to those that maintain it. There are a number of strategies to deliver a project, but most use the private sector in some way. To fairly include and harness these contractors, a tendering process has been set up by Main Roads and Local Government. The design of a project is massively important to eventually assess its success.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Voting Centres Now Open
    State General Election Saturday 13 March 2021. Early Voting Centres Now Open List of early voting centres as of 29 January 2021. Standard hours of operation for most early voting centres are 8 am - 6 pm Wednesday 24 Feburary to Friday 26 February; Tuesday 2 March - Saturday 6 March and Monday 8 March - Friday 12 March 2021. Hours for some Early Voting Centre locations such as court houses and libraries may vary. Robert Kennedy Wheelchair Access A Accessiblity Equipment Available Vote Assist Electoral Commissioner North Metropolitan Region VICTORIA PARK A Agricultural Region • VisAbility Centre, Handa Hall (within Perron Place), PERTH CBD ESPERANCE 61 Kitchener Ave - 8am to 6pm • 150 St Georges Terrace - 8am to 6pm A • Esperance Courthouse, 100 Dempster Street • Suite G06, 256 Adelaide Terracce (Septimus Roe WILLETTON A Mon - Fri 9.00am - 4.00pm • Unit 2, 179 - 181 High Road - 8am to 6pm Square) - 8am to 6pm GERALDTON A • St Georges Terrace Post Shop, East Metropolitan Region • Shop 1, 89 Durlacher Street - 8am to 6pm 66 St Georges Terrace Mon - Fri 8am to 5pm ARMADALE KATANNING (Only Limited Issue Points) • Unit 2, 36 - 40 Commerce Avenue - 8am to 6pm • Katanning Library, 16-24 Austral Terrace • Cloisters Square Post Shop, Shop 17 BAYSWATER A Mon, Tue, Thu, Fri 10.00am - 5.00pm, Wed 1.00pm - 5.00pm 200 St Georges Terrace (Enter at 863 Hay St, Perth) • Tenancy 2, 68 Beechboro Road South - - Mon - Fri 9am to 5pm (Only Limited Issue Points) 8am to 6pm MERREDIN • Merredin Community Resource Centre, BUTLER A BELMONT 108 Barrack Street - Mon
    [Show full text]
  • RAC Risky Roads Survey Results 2016/17
    RAC Risky Roads Survey results 2016/17 Risky Roads is WA's largest road infrastructure survey which asks the community to nominate dangerous roads and intersections around the State. The 2016 survey received over 6,000 nominations. These are the top 10 roads and intersections nominated in metropolitan and regional WA. For information on all Risky Roads campaigns visit riskyroads.com.au For more information, please contact [email protected] State-wide Top ten intersections Rank Intersection Issues 1 Forrest Highway (Australind Bypass) X Hynes Road, Speed of vehicles too high. Inadequate crossing or turning Eaton opportunity. Inadequate traffic light system. 2 Denny Avenue X Streich Avenue, Kelmscott Confusing road or intersection layout. Inadequate traffic light system. Inadequate crossing or turning opportunity. 3 Denny Avenue X Railway Avenue, Kelmscott Confusing road or intersection layout. Inadequate traffic light system. Inadequate crossing or turning opportunity. 4 Edgewater Drive X Ocean Reef Road, Edgewater Inadequate crossing or turning opportunity. Inadequate traffic light system. Speed of vehicles too high. 5 Green Street X Scarborough Beach Road, Mount Confusing road or intersection layout. Inadequate crossing or turning Hawthorn opportunity. Inadequate traffic light system. 6 Albany Highway X S Coast Highway, Orana (Albany) Confusing road or intersection layout. Inadequate crossing or turning Includes Chester Pass X Hanrahan X North Road X Albany Highway roundabout. opportunity. Inadequate traffic light system. 7 Garden Street X Nicholson Road X Yale Road, Confusing road or intersection layout. Inadequate crossing or turning Canning Vale roundabout opportunity. 8 Beaufort Street X Walcott Street , Mount Lawley Inadequate traffic light system. Inadequate crossing or turning opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • RAC Risky Roads Survey Results 2018/19
    RAC Risky Roads Survey results 2018/19 Risky Roads is WA's largest road infrastructure survey which asks the community to nominate dangerous roads and intersections around the State. The 2018 survey received over 6,000 nominations. These are the top 10 roads and intersections nominated in metropolitan and regional WA. For more information, please contact [email protected] Metropolitan Perth Top ten risky roads Rank Road Issues 1 Keirnan Street, Mundijong Poor/no pedestrian access/footpath. Unsafe or poor pedestrian crossing. Poor road surface quality 2 Kwinana Freeway & Canning Highway interchange, Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Lacks median strip/traffic separation. Como Confusing layout 3 Armadale Road, Cockburn to Armadale* Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Area requires lights/roundabout. Vehicles travel over the speed limit 4 Denny Avenue, Kelmscott* Poorly timed traffic light system. Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Confusing layout 5 North Lake Road (South Street to Cockburn Central), Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Area requires lights/roundabout. Kardinya – Cockburn Central Poorly timed traffic light system 6 Albany Highway, Bentley - Cannington Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Area requires lights/roundabout. Poorly timed traffic light system 7 Thomas Road (Tonkin Highway to Kwinana Freeway), Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Narrow road, lanes or bridges. Area Oakford requires lights/roundabout 8 Beaufort Street, Mt Lawley - Inglewood Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Area requires lights/roundabout. Vehicles travel over the speed limit 9 Hartman Drive, Darch Little chance to turn/cross traffic. Area requires lights/roundabout. Lacks median strip/traffic separation 10 (a) Abernethy Road (Warrington Road to South Western Little chance to turn/cross traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Come Home to Convenience at Harrisdale Green
    Come home to convenience at Harrisdale Green. Situated just 20km from the Perth CBD, Harrisdale Green offers a convenient lifestyle for people wanting to live in a well-established, family-friendly community within easy reach of the city. Striking the perfect balance between convenience and tranquility, with schools, shops and cafés just minutes away, your beautiful new home will be just moments away from parks and natural bushland. Carefully designed as the ideal place for making memories, making new friends or making every day an adventure, Harrisdale Green boasts a vibrant community that’s waiting for you to come home to. - 4 - - 5 - Piara Waters Pavilion Come home to a family-friendly way of life. A reflection of the booming popularity of the area, this carefully crafted estate is located close to a number of sport ovals, shopping centres and a choice of excellent education options including Piara Waters Primary and Harridsale Senior High School. Harrisdale Green is a place where you can feel safe, welcome and excited to raise your family, with a great range of parks to enjoy and all the creature comforts and more close by. Harrisdale Senior High School With Southern River Shopping Centre across the road, some of the most sought-after schools in the southern metropolitan corridor nearby, and easy access to transport links and major arterial routes, Harrisdale Green is a little pocket of peace and tranquility at the heart of it all. Harrisdale Green, Harrisdale 6112 harrisdalegreen.com.au - 6 - - 7 - Harrisdale Shopping Centre Coles Southern River Shopping Centre Timber Cafe Come home to everything you need.
    [Show full text]
  • WHEATBELT SNAPSHOT SERIES: LAND BASED TRANSPORT Version 2 July 2014
    WHEATBELT SNAPSHOT SERIES: LAND BASED TRANSPORT Version 2 July 2014 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT This document summarises the Wheatbelt Development Commission’s (WDC) understanding of transport infrastructure issues in the Wheatbelt. It highlights strategic issues for the region and proposes solutions to these problems. It is a working document, and stakeholders are encouraged to contact the WDC if they identify any errors. FACTS The Wheatbelt contains major interregional and interstate transport linkages such as the Great Northern Highway, Great Eastern Highway, Great Southern Highway, Brand Highway and the Albany Highway; and the East West Rail link. There is 45,069km(1) of road in the Wheatbelt servicing a mix of local, tourist and freight traffic (see Appendix 1 for details). An integrated land transport network is a vital aspect of the Wheatbelt economy. Sustainable, effective and efficient transport networks are critical to foster commercial enterprise and safe domestic use. Figure 1: Wheatbelt Region (WDC 2012) Version: 01 – Revision Due 30/06/2014 1 (1) (2) Main Roads, Regional Digest 2011-2012. Strategic Grain Freight Network Committee Report, 2009. KEY TRANSPORT ISSUES and expand industry opportunity in the Wheatbelt, particularly in relation to transport logistics. The Outer Ring Perth to Darwin National Highway (PDNH) (Great Road will reduce the requirement for heavy freight to Northern Highway) traverse the metropolitan area and will also connect to the larger scale Portlink proposal. The scale, stakeholders and The National Land Transport Network forms the backbone of nature of the project makes the development of a single passenger and freight transport in Australia, with the PDNH business case particularly complex, but it can be broken into linking Perth with Northern Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • SAT JPS Template Ver
    [2016] WASAT 22 JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT : PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005 (WA) CITATION : SITA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and WHEATBELT JOINT DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL [2016] WASAT 22 MEMBER : MR P McNAB (SENIOR MEMBER) MR J JORDAN (SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER) DR A HINWOOD (SESSIONAL MEMBER) HEARD : 18 AND 19 NOVEMBER 2015 DELIVERED : 8 MARCH 2016 FILE NO/S : SAT 127 of 2014 BETWEEN : SITA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Applicant AND WHEATBELT JOINT DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL Respondent Catchwords: Town planning - Development application - Proposed waste landfill development in rural area - 'Putrescible landfill' - Amended proposal under review - Significant regulation of facility by Department of Environment Regulation (DER) - DER indicating works approval would be given on extensive conditions - Land use classification - Whether proposal 'noxious industry' - Permissible land use under Town Planning Scheme - Significant agreement by all environmental experts on groundwater and hydrological issues Page 1 [2016] WASAT 22 indicating no environmental threat - Significant agreement on planning and local amenity issues indicating approval warranted - Whether approval should be given - Whether approval should be given in the absence of strategic planning for wider regional area including site - Conditional approval given by Tribunal - Appropriate conditions to regulate facility - Observations on duplication and overlapping of planning with other conditions - Role of Shire in formulating conditions • Words and phrases: 'noxious industry'
    [Show full text]
  • Anstey-Keane Urban Development Precinct – South West Precinct Structure Plan Lots 3, 5, & 61 Armadale Road and 23, 24 & 336 Anstey Road, Forrestdale
    Anstey-Keane Urban Development Precinct – South West Precinct Structure Plan Lots 3, 5, & 61 Armadale Road and 23, 24 & 336 Anstey Road, Forrestdale Prepared by Hex Design and Planning & Michael Glendinning Property ENDORSEMENT PAGE This Structure Plan is prepared under the pro isions of the City of Armadale Scheme No.4 IT IS CERTIFIED THAT THIS STRUCTURE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION O : 13 March 2020 Date An officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission pursuant to section 16 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 for that purpose, in the presence of: 13 March 2030 Date of Expiry TABLE OF AMENDMENTS Amendment No. Summary of Amendment Amendment Date approved by Type WAPC Executive Summary Structure Plan - Anstey Road South Precinct This report represents an application to the City of Armadale to consider a proposed Structure Plan over Lots 3, 5, & 61 Armadale Road and 23, 24 & 336 Anstey Road, Forrestdale, herein referred to as the ‘Anstey Road South’ planning precinct. The subject lots, which have a combined area of 19.18 ha, are located in the south-western quadrant of a larger precinct known as the ‘Anstey-Keane Precinct’, for which the City of Armadale has initiated a ‘Planning and Liaison Group’. The subject land is situated approximately 2km west of the Tonkin Highway, and 8km west of the Armadale District Centre. The Structure Plan has been prepared concurrently to a Local Scheme Amendment to rezone the land within the Anstey-Keane Precinct to ‘Urban Development’. Structure Plans for other landholdings within the Precinct are being progressed by others and the integration of the three Structure Plans is a focus of the City’s Planning and Liaison Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Receding Hairline
    Perth Hash House Harriers - Receding Hairline www.perthhash.com Run : Hare: Co-Hare: Run Comments: 1046 26 February 1990 Sawbones 1047 5 March 1990 Committee Harriettes 1048 12 March 1990 Bazza 1049 19 March 1990 Crater 1050 26 March 1990 Ee Aarr 1051 2 April 1990 Me Mate 1052 9 April 1990 Stumbles 1053 16 April 1990 Polecat 1056 7 June 1990 (Thu) Committee H4 1057 14 May 1990 Brutus 1058 21 May 1990 Shakin 1059 28 May 1990 Christ 1060 4 June 1990 Shylock 1061 11 June 1990 Jaapie 1062 18 June 1990 Galloping Gillie 1063 25 June 1990 Polly Bushranger 1064 2 July 1990 Arab 1065 9 July 1990 Iceman 1066 16 July 1990 Committee Bullsbrook 666 run 1067 23 July 1990 Wagon 1068 30 July 1990 Flyboy 1069 6 August 1990 Sir Tom Dunnee Arse 1070 13 August 1990 Aids 1071 20 August 1990 Budgie 1072 27 August 1990 Mumbles 1073 3 September 1990 Wombat 1074 10 September 1990 Emu 1075 17 September 1990 Raindrops 1077 2 October 1990 (Tue) Lumpy Mr Wong 1078 8 October 1990 Scrooge Barney 1079 15 October 1990 Growie Dazza 1080 22 October 1990 Bo Derek Twohill 1081 29 October 1990 Chunder 1082 5 November 1990 Mafia 1083 12 November 1990 Dulux 1084 19 November 1990 Slack 1085 26 November 1990 Ankles 1086 3 December 1990 Haggis Antman 1087 10 December 1990 Chalkie 1088 17 December 1990 Doc 1089 24 December 1990 Stumbles Kong 1090 30 December 1990 (Sun) Dunnee 1091 1 January 1991 (Tue) Cans 1092 14 January 1991 Radio Ron 1093 21 January 1991 Sir Tom Arse 1094 29 January 1991 (Tue) Kong Cans 19-Oct-20 www.perthhash.com 1 Perth Hash House Harriers - Receding Hairline www.perthhash.com Run : Hare: Co-Hare: Run Comments: 1095 4 February 1991 Deke Ol' Wares 1096 11 February 1991 Ol' Wares Jungle 1097 18 February 1991 Committee 1098 25 February 1991 Brutus John Roberts 1099 4 March 1991 Committee Palace Run 1100 11 March 1991 Louie the Colonel Fly 1101 18 March 1991 Waterworks A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework Part B: Regional Infrastructure Planning
    Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework Part B Framework Regional Planning and Infrastructure Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework Part B: Regional Infrastructure Planning December 2015 December 2015 Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework Part B: Regional Infrastructure Planning December 2015 Part B: Regional Infrastructure Planning Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework Disclaimer This document has been published by the Department of Planning on behalf of the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. The infrastructure projects identified in the Wheatbelt Regional Planning and Infrastructure Framework are based on existing unaudited information available from State agencies, utilities and departments. The infrastructure listed is not comprehensive and estimates of infrastructure, timeframes and costs are indicative only. Infrastructure identified is based upon the information available at the time of enquiry, and may be subject to review and change to meet new circumstances.
    [Show full text]