DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Earthquakes, 1980 Open-File Report 84 -980 Prepared

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Earthquakes, 1980 Open-File Report 84 -980 Prepared DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY United States Earthquakes, 1980 By Carl W. Stover and Carl A. von Hake Open-File report 84 -980 Prepared in cooperation with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. 1984 Contributors Contributors to this publication are listed below according to the information furnished or service performed: Hypocenters and magnitudes: W. LeRoy Irby, U.S. Geological Survey Reino Kangas, U.S. Geological Survey John H. Minsch, U.S. Geological Survey Russ foeedham, U.S. Geological Survey Waverly J. Person, U.S. Geological Survey Bruce W. Presgrave, U.S. Geological Survey William Schmieder, U.S. Geological Survey Robert Y. Koyanagi, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Intensities: Carl W. Stover, U.S. Geological Survey Robert Y. Koyanagi, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Network Operations (by institution): University of Alaska University of California, Berkeley California Institute of Technology Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Kansas Geological Survey Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Columbia University Oklahoma Geological Survey St. Louis University University of Utah Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University of Washington Weston Observatory, Boston College Geodesy: Sandford R. Holdahl, NOAA, NOS, National Geodetic Survey Richard A. Snay, NOAA, NOS, National Geodetic Survey William E. Carter, NOAA, NOS, National Geodetic Survey Tsunamis: Mark G. Spaeth, NOAA, National Weather Service Strong-motion seismograph data: Ronald L. Porcella, U.S. Geological Survey Editorial assistance and manuscript preparations: Paula K. Dunbar, U.S. Geological Survey Contents Page Contributors.............................................................iii Introduction............................................................. 1 Discussion of Tables................................................ 1 Epicenter and Isoseismal Maps....................................... 1 Earthquake Information Services..................................... 3 Magnitude and Intensity Ratings..................................... 3 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale................................... 5 Collaborators....................................................... 7 Earthquake Descriptions.................................................. 8 Alabama............................................................. 8 Alaska.............................................................. 8 Arizona............................................................. 12 California.......................................................... 12 California Off the coast........................................... 55 Connecticut......................................................... 60 Georgia............................................................. 60 Hawaii.............................................................. 60 Idaho............................................................... 65 Illinois............................................................ 65 Indiana............................................................. 66 Kentucky............................................................ 66 Maine............................................................... 78 Massachusetts....................................................... 78 Michigan. ........................................................... 78 Mississippi......................................................... 79 Missouri............................................................ 79 Montana............................................................. 79 Nevada.............................................................. 80 hew Hampshire....................................................... 83 New Jersey.......................................................... 83 New Mexico.......................................................... 83 New York............................................................ 83 North Carolina. ..................................................... 84 Ohio................................................................ 85 Oklahoma............................................................ 85 Oregon.............................................................. 85 Pennsylvania........................................................ 85 Puerto Rico......................................................... 87 South Carolina...................................................... 87 Tennessee........................................................... 87 Texas............................................................... 88 Utah................................................................ 88 Virginia............................................................ 89 Washington.......................................................... 89 West Virginia....................................................... 93 Wisconsin........................................................... 93 Wyoming............................................................. 93 Network Operations....................................................... 134 Alaska Earthquakes, 1980............................................ 134 Northern and Central California Earthquakes, 1980................... 134 Southern California Earthquakes, 1980...............................136 Hawaii Earthquakes, 1980............................................ 137 Kansas Earthquakes, 1980............................................ 139 Central Mississippi Valley Earthquakes, 1980........................ 139 New England Earthquakes, 1980.......................................140 Earthquakes in New York State and Adjacent Areas, 1980..............142 Oklahoma Earthquakes, 1980..........................................145 Southeastern United States Earthquakes, 1980........................148 Utah Earthquakes, 1980.............................................. 149 Washington Earthquakes, 1980........................................150 Miscellaneous Activities.................................................152 Crustal Movement Studies............................................ 152 Space Technology....................................................153 Tsunamis............................................................154 Principal Earthquakes of the World..................................154 Strong-Motion Seismograph Data........................................... 159 Introduction........................................................159 Accelerograph Data.................................................. 160 References...............................................................181 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Summary of U.S. earthquakes for 1980................................ 94 2 Kansas earthquakes, 1980............................................ 139 3 New England earthquakes, 1980....................................... 142 4 Oklahoma earthquake catalog for 1980................................148 5 Southeastern United States earthquakes, 1980........................149 6 Principal earthquakes of the world during 1980...................... 155 7 Summary of U.S. accelerograph records recovered during 1980......... 166 8 Strong-motion stations that recorded both the January 24 and January 26 Livermore earthquakes .................................... 180 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1 Earthquake epicenters in the conterminous United States for 1980.... 2 2 Earthquake epicenters in Alaska for 1980............................ 2 3 Earthquake epicenters in Hawaii for 1980............................ 3 4 Plot of earthquakes in the conterminous United States that were felt or caused damage in 1980............................................ 4 5 Plot of earthquakes in Alaska that were felt or caused damage in 1980................................................................ 4 6 Plot of earthquakes in Hawaii that were felt or caused damage in 1980................................................................ 5 7 Isoseismal map for the central California earthquake of 24 January 1980................................................................ 14 vi 8 Photograph of damage to fermenting tanks at the Wente Brothers Winery near Livermore, Calif........................................ 16 9 Photograph of damage to one support of the elevated water tank at the Wente Brothers Winery near Livermore, Calif..................... 18 10 Photograph of damage to a mobile home in the Sunrise Mobile Home Park in Springtown, Calif........................................... 21 11 Isoseismal map for the southern California earthquake of 25 February 1980.................................................... 28 12 Isoseismal map for the central California earthquake of 13 April 1980................................................................ 31 13 Isoseismal map for the Owens Valley area, California, earthquake of 25 May 1980, 16 33 44.2 UTC...................................... 34 14 Isoseismal map for the Owens Valley area, California, earthquake of 25 May 1980, 19 44 51.0 UTC......................................... 38 15 Isoseismal map for the Owens Valley area, California, earthquake of 27 May 1980......................................................... 41 16 Isoseiscial map for the Baja California, Mexico, earthquake of 9 June 1980................................................................ 44 17 Isoseismal map for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 THIS PAGE: Geologists have lloongng been monimonittoorriing the volcanoes of Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park. Here lalava cascades durduriingng the 1969-1971 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kīlauea VolVolcano. NotNotee the Mauna Ulu fountountaiain in the background. U.S. Geologiogicalcal SurSurvveyey PhotPhotoo by J. B. Judd (12/30/1969). ON THE COVER: ContContiinuouslnuouslyy eruptuptiingng since 1983, Kīllaueaauea Volcano contcontiinues to shapshapee Hawai‘Hawai‘i VoVollccanoes NatiNationalonal ParkPark.. Photo courtesy Lisa Venture/UniversiUniversitty of Cincinnati. Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars
    geosciences Article Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars Stuart Hardy 1,2 1 ICREA (Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-934-02-13-76 2 Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà, Facultat de Ciències de la Terra, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Martí i Franqués s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Abstract: Pit craters are now recognised as being an important part of the surface morphology and structure of many planetary bodies, and are particularly remarkable on Mars. They are thought to arise from the drainage or collapse of a relatively weak surficial material into an open (or widening) void in a much stronger material below. These craters have a very distinctive expression, often presenting funnel-, cone-, or bowl-shaped geometries. Analogue models of pit crater formation produce pits that typically have steep, nearly conical cross sections, but only show the surface expression of their initiation and evolution. Numerical modelling studies of pit crater formation are limited and have produced some interesting, but nonetheless puzzling, results. Presented here is a high-resolution, 2D discrete element model of weak cover (regolith) collapse into either a static or a widening underlying void. Frictional and frictional-cohesive discrete elements are used to represent a range of probable cover rheologies. Under Martian gravitational conditions, frictional-cohesive and frictional materials both produce cone- and bowl-shaped pit craters. For a given cover thickness, the specific crater shape depends on the amount of underlying void space created for drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Craters Oregon's Geologic
    Text by Ellen M. Benedict, 1985 Features at stops correspond to points on a clock ago, a huge mass of hot gases, volcanic ashes, bits face. Imagine that you are standing in the middle of a of pumice and other pyroclastics (fire-broken rock) Travel And Hiking Hints clock face. Twelve o’clock is the road in front of you violently erupted. The blast – greater than the May and 6 o’clock the road behind. If you always align the 18, 1980, eruption of Mt. St. Helens – deposited a Diamond Craters is located in the high desert country clock face with the road, you should be able to locate layer of pyroclastics 30 to 130 feet thick over an area about 55 miles southeast of Burns, Oregon. It’s an the features. almost 7,000 square miles! isolated place and some precautions should be taken . when traveling in the area. Start Tour. Mileage begins halfway Pyroclastics are between milepost 40 and 41 on State normal behavior Diamond Craters has no tourist facilities. The nearest Highway 205 at the junction to Diamond. for magmas place where gasoline is sold is at Frenchglen. Turn left. (subsurface That’s the opinion held by scores of molten rocks) Keep your scientists and educators who have visited Diamond, Oregon, a small ranching community, was of rhyolitic (a vehicle on named in 1874 for Mace McCoy’s Diamond brand. volcanic material and studied the area. It has the “best and hard-packed The nearby craters soon became known as Diamond related to granite) most diverse basaltic volcanic features in the road surfaces Craters.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Professional Paper 1350, Vol. 2 of 2
    VOLCANISM IN HAWAII Chapter 59 THE ROLE OF LAVA TUBES IN HAWAIIAN VOLCANOES By Ronald Greeley I ABSTRACT set on the initiation and evolution of lava tubes and their associated Lava tubes develop from eruptions that typically involve: flows. (1) moderate rates of effusion, (2) durations greater than one or Numerous studies of lava tubes have been made in areas two days, and (3) effusion of fluid lava (for example, pahoehoe) outside Hawaii, including Mount Elna (Guest and others, 1980), that has not been greatly degassed. Although some fountain-fed Mount St. Helens (Greeley and Hyde, 1972), and New Mexico lava and aa flows can fonn lava tubes, such occurrences are rare (Hatheway and Herring, 1970). From these studies and those in in Hawaii. Lava tubes feed flows: (1) directly from the vent (acting as extensions of the conduit), (2) from various holding Hawaii, lava tubes clearly reflect a particular style of volcanism and reservoirs (for example, lava ponds, lava lakes, filled pit cra­ are the primary means for the spread of some types of lava flows. ters), and (3) from flows on the flanks of volcanoes. Historical flows of greatest length in Hawaii were emplaced primarily via lava tubes, and many subaqueous flows involve lava tubes. 166'00' 166'00' Sustained flow of lava in tubes appears capable of erosion into preflow terrain. Photogeological analyses suggest that at least 30 percent of the flows (by area) on Mauna Loa, 58 percent of the flows on Kilauea, and 18 percentof the flows on Mount Etna were at least partly emplaced via tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Cave Entrances on Mars
    G.E. Cushing – Candidate cave entrances on Mars. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 74, no. 1, p. 33–47. DOI: 10.4311/ 2010EX0167R CANDIDATE CAVE ENTRANCES ON MARS GLEN E. CUSHING U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA, [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents newly discovered candidate cave entrances into Martian near-surface lava tubes, volcano-tectonic fracture systems, and pit craters and describes their characteristics and exploration possibilities. These candidates are all collapse features that occur either intermittently along laterally continuous trench-like depressions or in the floors of sheer-walled atypical pit craters. As viewed from orbit, locations of most candidates are visibly consistent with known terrestrial features such as tube-fed lava flows, volcano-tectonic fractures, and pit craters, each of which forms by mechanisms that can produce caves. Although we cannot determine subsurface extents of the Martian features discussed here, some may continue unimpeded for many kilometers if terrestrial examples are indeed analogous. The features presented here were identified in images acquired by the Mars Odyssey’s Thermal Emission Imaging System visible- wavelength camera, and by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s Context Camera. Select candidates have since been targeted by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experi- ment. Martian caves are promising potential sites for future human habitation and astrobiology investigations; understanding their characteristics is critical for long-term mission planning and for developing the necessary exploration technologies. INTRODUCTION cosmic rays (e.g., Mazur et al., 1978; De Angeles et al., 2002; Boston et al., 2004; Cushing et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, May 4, 2021 1. Call to Order 2:30 Pm Leiopapa a Kamehameha Building Office
    HA WAI'I BOARDON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES (HBGN) Tuesday, May 4, 2021 2:30 p.m. Leiopapa A Kamehameha Building Officeof Planning, 6th Floor Conference Room 235 S. Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 Zoom Meeting information: https://bit.ly/hbgn-20210504 Meeting ID: 932 3302 1740 Passcode: 581819 1. Call to Order 2. Review ofMeeting Minutes forApril 6, 2021 3. Public Comments 4. Announcements 5. Status ofbills and resolutions in the Legislature 6. Discussion and Action on Permitted Interaction Group for Lo'ihi / Kama'ehu 7. Review selected place names on the island ofHawai'i (Camara) 8. Adjournment This meeting of the Hawai'i Board on Geographic Names (HBGN) will be available forlive viewing via Zoom. Zoom Meeting information: https://bit.ly/hbgn-20210504 or https://zoom.us/j/93233021740?pwd=Ui9LbmxwMERYRkhDWDR WUHZaeHFRdz09 Meeting ID: 932 3302 1740 Passcode: 581819 MINUTES DRAFT FOR THE MEETING OF THE HAWAI‘I BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES DATE: April 6, 2021 TIME: 2:30 p.m. PLACE: Leiopapa A Kamehameha Building Office of Planning, 6th Floor Library 235 S. Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813 AGENDA ITEM 1: Call to Order Mr. Marzan called the meeting to order at 2:36 p.m. The following were in attendance: MEMBERS: Marques Marzan (Bishop Museum) Arthur Buto for Mary Alice Evans (Office of Planning) Meyer Cummins (Land Survey Division) Holly McEldowney (Department of Land and Natural Resources) left early at 3:20pm Niniau Kawaihae (Department of Hawaiian Home Lands) Kapā Oliveira (University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa) Brad Kaʻaleleo Wong (Office of Hawaiian Affairs) ABSENT: None GUESTS: Jennifer Runyon (USGS) Lāmaku Mikahala Roy Melia Lane-Kamahele Regina Hilo Bobby Camara Renee Pualani Louis Catherine Sullivan AGENDA ITEM 2: Review of Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2021 Lamakū Roy asked for her attendance to be recognized and that she is here to comment on the minutes from the March meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Vat ~ O ~ $ of Actively Forming ~ Tubes and Associated
    P- :-a I X E I- sa z ~~§E~VAT~O~$OF ACTIVELY FORMING ~~VATUBES AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES, HAWAII Page 1 R. Greeley OBSERVATIONS OF ACTIVELY FORWING LAVA TUBES R_ND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES, HAWAII Ronald Greeley Space Science Division Ames Research Center, NASA Moffett Fieldg Calif. 94035 Page 2 R. Greeley Abstract - Observations of active basalt flows in the Upper East Rift Zone of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, and considerations of previous flow descriptions permit speculation on mechanisms of lava tube and channel development. Fluid basalts were erupted in August, 1970 (period of obser- vation), from a vent near Alae Crater and flowed southeast across Chain of Craters Road toward Poliokeawe Pali and the sea, all within Hawaii Vol- canoes National Park. Forming exclusively in pahoehoe (fluid) basaLt , tubes in general evolve from lava channels by crustal formation, although some tubes develop directly from the vent. Observations discussed here show that channel crusts and tube roofs form in several ways: 1) accumu- lation and thickening of thin surface scums which are fused together and attached to stationary channel sides; 2) accumulation and fusing of flex- ible, mobile crustal plates; 3) formation of stable, well-defined crusts along both channel sides; crusts grow to the center of the channel and merge; 4) agglutination of spattered lava in turbulent flows to form lateral levees; levees may arch over the channel and fuse; and 5) accretion of lava toe and lobe crusts at the flow front, extending an existing lava tube at about the same rate as the advance of the flow. Lava channels/tubes usually form along the axis of highest velocity within the flow and are often centered along older lava channels/tubes stream beds rifts ., grabens or fracture zones.
    [Show full text]
  • AND OTHER VOLCANIC-ROCK AQUIFERS—Continued
    BASALTIC- AND OTHER VOLCANIC-ROCK AQUIFERS—Continued Pliocene and younger basaltic-rock aquifers are the most the plain. The altitude of the water table is greatest in Fre- productive aquifers in the Snake River Plain. The saturated mont County, Idaho, near the eastern border of the plain and thickness of the Pliocene and younger basaltic rocks is locally least in the Hells Canyon area along the Idaho–Oregon bor- greater than 2,500 feet in parts of the eastern Snake River Plain der. Where the water-table contours bend upstream as they but is much less in the western plain (fig. 44). Aquifers in cross the Snake River (for example, near Twin Falls, Idaho), EXPLANATION Miocene basaltic rocks underlie the Pliocene and younger the aquifer system is discharging to the river. In a general way, Unconsolidated-deposit aquifers basaltic-rock aquifers (fig. 43), but the Miocene basaltic-rock the spacing between the contours reflects changes in the geo- aquifers are used as a source of water only near the margins logic and hydrologic character of the aquifer system. Widely Pliocene and younger basaltic-rock aquifers North of the plain. Unconsolidated-deposit aquifers are interbedded spaced contours in the Eastern Plain indicate more perme- Little Wood Miocene basaltic-rock aquifers Desert upland River with the basaltic-rock aquifers, especially near the boundaries able or thicker parts of the aquifer system, whereas closely Big Wood Silicic volcanic rocks of the plain. The unconsolidated deposits consist of alluvial spaced contours in the Western Plain indicate less permeable River material or soil that developed on basaltic rock, or both, and or thinner parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging the Subsurface Structure of Pit Craters
    EGU21-5067 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-5067 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Imaging the subsurface structure of pit craters Craig Magee1, Christopher A-L Jackson2, Corbin L Kling3, and Paul K Byrne4 1University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales ([email protected]) 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 3Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 4Planetary Research Group, Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State Univer-sity, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA Pit craters are enigmatic sub-circular depressions observed on rocky and icy planetary bodies across the Solar System. These craters do not primarily form during catastrophic impact or the forcible eruption of subsurface materials, but likely due to collapse of subsurface cavities following fluid (e.g., magma) movement and/or extensional tectonics. Pit craters thus provide important surficial records of otherwise inaccessible subsurface processes. However, unlocking these pit crater archives is difficult because we do not know how their surface expression relates to their subsurface structure or driving mechanisms. As such, there is a variety of hypotheses concerning pit crater formation, which variously relate cavity collapse to: (i) opening of dilatational jogs during faulting; (ii) tensile fracturing; (iii) karst development; (iv) permafrost melting; (v) lava tube evacuation; (vi) volatile release from dyke tip process zones; (vii) pressure waning behind a propagating dike tip; (viii) migration of magma away from a reservoir; and/or (ix) hydrothermal fluid movement inducing host rock porosity collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 THIS PAGE: Geologists have long been monitoring the volcanoes of Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park.k. Here lava cascades during the 1969-1971 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kīlauea Vollcano. Note the Mauna Ullu fountain in tthee background. U.S. Geological Survey Photo by J. B. Judd (12/30/1969). ON THE COVER: Continuously erupting since 1983, Kīllaueaauea Vollcanocano continues to shape Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park. Photo courtesy Lisa Venture/University of Cincinnati. Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospected Lava Tubes at Hellas Planitia
    ACCEPTED BY THE JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 13 OCT 2019 FOR PUB: FALL 2019 1 PROSPECTIVE LAVA TUBES AT HELLAS PLANITIA LEVERAGING VOLCANIC FEATURES ON MARS TO PROVIDE CREWED MISSIONS PROTECTION FROM RADIATION ANTONIO J. PARIS, EVAN T. DAVIES, LAURENCE TOGNETTI, & CARLY ZAHNISER CENTER FOR PLANETARY SCIENCE ABSTRACT Mars is currently at the center of intense scientific study aimed at potential human colonization. Consequently, there has been increased curiosity in the identification and study of lava tubes for information on the paleohydrological, geomorphological, geological, and potential biological history of Mars, including the prospect of present microbial life on the planet. Lava tubes, furthermore, could serve as in–situ habitats for upcoming crewed missions to Mars by providing protection from solar energetic particles, unpredictable high-energy cosmic radiation (i.e., gamma-ray bursts), bombardment of micrometeorites, exposure to dangerous perchlorates due to long-term dust storms, and extreme temperature fluctuations. The purpose of this investigation is to identify and study prospective lava tubes at Hellas Planitia, a plain located inside the large impact basin Hellas in the southern hemisphere of Mars, through the use of Earth analogue structures. The search for lava tubes at Hellas Planitia is primarily due to the low radiation environment at this particular location. Several studies by NASA spacecraft have measured radiation levels in this region at ~342 µSv/day, which is considerably less than other regions on the surface of Mars (~547 µSv/day). Notwithstanding, a radiation exposure of ~342 µSv/day is still sizably higher than what human beings in developed nations are annually exposed to on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1455189355674.Pdf
    THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN Cover by: Peter Bradley LEGAL PAGE: Every effort has been made not to make use of proprietary or copyrighted materi- al. Any mention of actual commercial products in this book does not constitute an endorsement. www.trolllord.com www.chenaultandgraypublishing.com Email:[email protected] Printed in U.S.A © 2013 Chenault & Gray Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Storyteller’s Thesaurus Trademark of Cheanult & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Chenault & Gray Publishing, Troll Lord Games logos are Trademark of Chenault & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS 1 FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR 1 JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN 1 INTRODUCTION 8 WHAT MAKES THIS BOOK DIFFERENT 8 THE STORYTeller’s RESPONSIBILITY: RESEARCH 9 WHAT THIS BOOK DOES NOT CONTAIN 9 A WHISPER OF ENCOURAGEMENT 10 CHAPTER 1: CHARACTER BUILDING 11 GENDER 11 AGE 11 PHYSICAL AttRIBUTES 11 SIZE AND BODY TYPE 11 FACIAL FEATURES 12 HAIR 13 SPECIES 13 PERSONALITY 14 PHOBIAS 15 OCCUPATIONS 17 ADVENTURERS 17 CIVILIANS 18 ORGANIZATIONS 21 CHAPTER 2: CLOTHING 22 STYLES OF DRESS 22 CLOTHING PIECES 22 CLOTHING CONSTRUCTION 24 CHAPTER 3: ARCHITECTURE AND PROPERTY 25 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND ELEMENTS 25 BUILDING MATERIALS 26 PROPERTY TYPES 26 SPECIALTY ANATOMY 29 CHAPTER 4: FURNISHINGS 30 CHAPTER 5: EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 ADVENTurer’S GEAR 31 GENERAL EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 2 THE STORYTeller’s Thesaurus KITCHEN EQUIPMENT 35 LINENS 36 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
    [Show full text]