DOCSLIB.ORG

Swedish Energy Agency Report Small Scale Gasification: Gas Engine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swedish Energy Agency Report Small Scale Gasification: Gas Engine Swedish Energy Agency Report Small Scale Gasification: Gas Engine CHP for Biofuels Jan Brandin, Martin Tunér, Ingemar Odenbrand Växjö/Lund 2011-05-30 Content Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project description ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 References to chapter 1 ................................................................................................................ 9 2. Biomass ............................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Use of biomass for energy production in Sweden ...................................................................... 10 2.2 Total potential for biofuel in Sweden .......................................................................................... 13 2.3 Summary biofuel use in Sweden ................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Pretreatment of biomass............................................................................................................. 15 2.4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 15 2.4.2 Growth of biomass ............................................................................................................... 16 2.4.3 Harvesting ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.4 Storage and pre‐drying ......................................................................................................... 17 2.4.5 Transportation ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.4.6 Conventional pelletization ................................................................................................... 18 2.4.7 Torrefaction and compacting ............................................................................................... 19 2.4.8 Drying ................................................................................................................................... 20 2.5 References to chapter 2 .............................................................................................................. 20 3. Gasification ....................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Gasification chemistry ................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 Tars .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 Minor contaminants: H2S, NH3, COS, and HCN............................................................................ 24 3.4 References to chapter 3 .............................................................................................................. 25 4. Gasifiers ............................................................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Fixed-bed gasifiers ...................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Updraft gasifiers ................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Downdraft Gasifiers .............................................................................................................. 27 4.1.3 Crossdraft gasifier ................................................................................................................. 27 4.2 Fluidized beds .............................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.1 Bubbling Fluidized bed (BFB) ................................................................................................ 29 4.2.2 Circulating fluidized bed (CFB) ........................................................................................... 30 4.3 Entrained-flow gasifier (EF) ....................................................................................................... 30 1 4.4 Multi-bed Gasifiers ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.4.1 Indirect heating ..................................................................................................................... 32 4.4.2 Separate pyrolysis and char gasification solutions ............................................................... 33 4.5 References to chapter 4 .............................................................................................................. 35 5. Gas cleaning ...................................................................................................................................... 37 5.1 Dust and ash ................................................................................................................................ 37 5.2 Tar cleaning ................................................................................................................................. 38 5.2.1 Removal and use .................................................................................................................. 39 5.2.2 In situ conversion ................................................................................................................. 40 5.3 Minor contaminates .................................................................................................................... 44 5.3.1. Sulphur ................................................................................................................................ 44 5.3.2 Ammonia .............................................................................................................................. 45 5.3.3 Alkali ..................................................................................................................................... 45 5.4 References to chapter 5 .............................................................................................................. 46 6 Combustion engine ............................................................................................................................ 47 6.1 Gas engines: an introduction....................................................................................................... 47 6.2 History of gas engines ................................................................................................................. 50 6.3 Fundamental definitions ............................................................................................................. 54 6.3.1 Basic engine operating principles ......................................................................................... 54 6.3.2 Combustion principles .......................................................................................................... 58 6.3.3 Engine out emissions and aftertreatment ........................................................................... 61 6.4 Producer gas quality versus engine performance ....................................................................... 66 6.4.1 Typical components of producer gas ................................................................................... 67 6.4.2 Contaminants ....................................................................................................................... 70 6.4.3 Heating value and air/fuel ratio ........................................................................................... 71 6.5 Commercial engines .................................................................................................................... 72 6.6 Research on producer gas engines .............................................................................................. 73 6.6.1 Overview of research in the last decade .............................................................................. 73 6.6.2 Recent research at Lund University ..................................................................................... 75 6.6.3 Research on engines directly fuelled with wood powder .................................................... 85 6.6.4 Future research .................................................................................................................... 86 6. 7 Referenses to Chapter 6 ............................................................................................................. 87 7 Case studies ........................................................................................................................................ 90 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CO2 REMOVAL from WOOD GAS Dahiru Rufai Ahmed
    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CO2 REMOVAL FROM WOOD GAS Dahiru Rufai Ahmed Master’s Thesis Master’s Degree Programme (BCBU) Environmental Engineering September 2013 1 UNIVERSITY OF OULU Abstract Thesis Faculty of Technology Department Degree Programme Department of Process and Environmental Master’s Degree Programme (BCBU) in Engineering Environmental Engineering Author Supervisor Dahiru, Rufai Ahmed Tanskanen, J., Professor Title of the thesis CO2 Removal from Wood Gas Study option Type of the thesis Submission date Number of pages Sustainable Energy Master’s Thesis 11th September, 2013 94 + 4 Appendix Abstract Gasification is considered as one of the most attractive conversion technologies, because the product gas from the process serves as a building block for several industrial applications. However, the use of biomass as a fuel in the gasification process offers a carbon neutral fuel that will alleviate the continuing use of fossil fuels sources. This study was done to evaluate the possible applications of syngas originating from biomass gasification, as a follow up to the earlier biomass gasification research of the HighBio project. The syngas from the gasification process is generally produced in a gasifier. An overview of the different type of gasifiers for biomass gasification that include updraft, downdraft, crossdraft, entrained-flow and plasma gasifiers was presented. The syngas can be utilized in the generation of power, heat, fuels and chemicals. A detailed overview of the promising applications of the syngas in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, hydroformylation of olefins, and syngas fermentation was also given. However, for these applications, a high degree of treatment and conditioning of the syngas is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardwood-Distillation Industry
    HARDWOOD-DISTILLATION INDUSTRY No. 738 Revised February 1956 41. /0111111 110 111111111111111111 t I 1, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY FOREST SERVICE MADISON 5, WISCONSIN. In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin 1 HARDWOOD-DISTILLATION INDUSTRY— By EDWARD BEGLINGER, Chemical Engineer 2 Forest Products Laboratory, — Forest Service U. S. Department of Agriculture The major portion of wood distillation products in the United States is obtained from forest and mill residues, chiefly beech, birch, maple, oak, and ash. Marketing of the natural byproducts recovered has been concerned traditionally with outlets for acetic acid, methanol, and charcoal. Large and lower cost production of acetic acid and methanol from other sources has severely curtailed markets formerly available to the distillation in- dustry, and has in turn created operational conditions generally unfavor- able to many of the smaller and more marginal plants. Increased demand for charcoal, which is recovered in the largest amount as a plant product, now provides a compensating factor for more favorable plant operation. The present hardwood-distillation industry includes six byproduct-recovery plants. With the exception of one smaller plant manufacturing primarily a specialty product, all have modern facilities for direct byproduct re- covery. Changing economic conditions during the past 25 years, including such factors as progressively increasing raw material, equipment, and labor costs, and lack of adequate markets for methanol and acetic acid, have caused the number of plants to be reduced from about 50 in the mid- thirties to the 6 now operating. In addition to this group, a few oven plants formerly practicing full recovery have retained the carbonizing equipment and produce only charcoal.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen-Enriched Compressed Natural Gas (HCNG)
    Year 2005 UCD—ITS—RR—05—29 Hydrogen Bus Technology Validation Program Andy Burke Zach McCaffrey Marshall Miller Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis Kirk Collier Neal Mulligan Collier Technologies, Inc. Institute of Transportation Studies ◊ University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue ◊ Davis, California 95616 PHONE: (530) 752-6548 ◊ FAX: (530) 752-6572 WEB: http://its.ucdavis.edu/ Hydrogen Bus Technology Validation Program Andy Burke, Zach McCaffrey, Marshall Miller Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis Kirk Collier, Neal Mulligan Collier Technologies, Inc. Technology Provider: Collier Technologies, Inc. Grant number: ICAT 01-7 Grantee: University of California, Davis Date: May 12, 2005 Conducted under a grant by the California Air Resources Board of the California Environmental Protection Agency The statements and conclusions in this Report are those of the grantee and not necessarily those of the California Air Resources Board. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such products 2 Acknowledgments Work on this program was funded by the Federal Transit Administration, the California Air Resources Board, and the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District. This Report was submitted under Innovative Clean Air Technologies grant number 01-7 from the California Air Resources Board. 3 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………...................6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………...................7
    [Show full text]
  • 2002-00201-01-E.Pdf (Pdf)
    report no. 2/95 alternative fuels in the automotive market Prepared for the CONCAWE Automotive Emissions Management Group by its Technical Coordinator, R.C. Hutcheson Reproduction permitted with due acknowledgement Ó CONCAWE Brussels October 1995 I report no. 2/95 ABSTRACT A review of the advantages and disadvantages of alternative fuels for road transport has been conducted. Based on numerous literature sources and in-house data, CONCAWE concludes that: · Alternatives to conventional automotive transport fuels are unlikely to make a significant impact in the foreseeable future for either economic or environmental reasons. · Gaseous fuels have some advantages and some growth can be expected. More specifically, compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) may be employed as an alternative to diesel fuel in urban fleet applications. · Bio-fuels remain marginal products and their use can only be justified if societal and/or agricultural policy outweigh market forces. · Methanol has a number of disadvantages in terms of its acute toxicity and the emissions of “air toxics”, notably formaldehyde. In addition, recent estimates suggest that methanol will remain uneconomic when compared with conventional fuels. KEYWORDS Gasoline, diesel fuel, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, CNG, LNG, Methanol, LPG, bio-fuels, ethanol, rape seed methyl ester, RSME, carbon dioxide, CO2, emissions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This literature review is fully referenced (see Section 12). However, CONCAWE is grateful to the following for their permission to quote in detail from their publications: · SAE Paper No. 932778 ã1993 - reprinted with permission from the Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. (15) · “Road vehicles - Efficiency and emissions” - Dr. Walter Ospelt, AVL LIST GmbH.
    [Show full text]
  • REPOWERING MONTANA a Blueprint for Home Grown Energy Self-Reliance
    REPOWERING MONTANA A Blueprint for Home Grown Energy Self-Reliance HOW ALL OF MONTANA’S POWER NEEDS CAN BE MET USING CONSERVATION AND CLEAN, RENEWABLE ENERGY WHILE CREATING JOBS, SAVING MONEY, AND REVITALIZING RURAL AND URBAN COMMUNITIES. Third Edition • Published by: Alternative Energy Resources Organization (AERO) 432 Last Chance Gulch • Helena, Montana 59601 www.aeromt.org • 406.443-7272 • Copyright © AERO 2008 AUTHORS: PRODUCTION: Cliff Bradley - Missoula and Bozeman, Montana Marita Martiniak Microbiologist, co-owner of Montana Microbial Products. Works on ethanol, bio-diesel, methane, farm-based energy systems. COORDINATION: Involved in issues of agricultural globalization, poverty and Jim Barngrover, Jonda Crosby, hunger. Peace activist. AERO Ag and Energy Task Forces. Ben Brouwer Tom Butts - Helena, Montana Self-employed professional wildlife biologist with long interest SPECIAL THANKS: in renewable energy, organic gardening, and reducing greenhouse Harry Blazer, Paul Cartwright, gas emissions. Writer, website builder. Member of the AERO Jeanne Charter, Kye Cochran, Energy Task Force. Sailboat afficionado. Doug Crabtree, Patrick Dawson, Russ Doty, Richard Freeman, Pat Dopler - Red Lodge, Montana Jeffrey Funk, Dick Jaffe, Owner of Dopler Solar, a company that sells and installs products Pat Judge, Jane Kile, Margaret for energy-efficient houses and incorporates passive and active MacDonald, David Morris, solar, wind and other advanced technologies. Longtime AERO Glee Murray, Lance Olsen, Ellen member, serves on Energy Task Force and AERO Board. Pfister, John Smillie, Anais Starr, Gloria Flora - Helena, Montana AERO’s Energy Task Force, and Founder, Sustainable Obtainable Solutions (SOS) focusing on many friends and allies for sustainable land and energy management. Writer, lecturer, inspiration, insight, critiques, consultant, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterson Gasifier.Pdf
    -What is Wood Gasification? -How Can it Fortify Your Home Energy Needs? Unlocking the Stored -How Much Power Can You Make From Free Wood Waste? Solar Energy in Wood: -How Do You Use the Gas In An Engine? A Primer on Wood Gasification -What are the Benefits of This Improved Design? -How Can it be Used to Replace Petroleum: The WWII Case Study Includes: Study Schematic Tool List Flow Chart Resource Links & more Presented by: WoodGasifierPlans.com Version 1.1 What is Wood Gasification? Wood Gasification is the process of using heat to thermally shift solid matter into a gaseous state, sort of like using heat to shift a solid ice cube into a steamy vapor. It’s a thermal chemical phase shifting process that breaks down the structure of wood to re- lease it’s most basic elements of hydrogen and carbon, i.e. hydro carbons. Very similar to what goes on in large scale re- fineries, just done in a simpler way, on a much smaller scale, without the mess and pollution. And since the wood used is a waste source, it’s both free and sustainable. Wood Gasification is a very clean way to make biogas in mere minutes. The wood is really just a storage battery for solar energy. Wood gas is a form of solar chemistry. The perfect com- pliment to solar thermal and solar electric be- cause you can tap into the energy day or night and even during the winter. Resources Most notable it solves a big problem that pho- Builder Resources tovoltaic panels don’t.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspective of Msw to Power Generation Through Gas Engine
    PERSPECTIVE OF MSW TO POWER GENERATION THROUGH GAS ENGINE DEZHEN. CHEN*, MIN. YANG* *Thermal & Environmental Engineering Institute, Mechanical Engineering College, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY: In this paper perspective of MSW to power generation through gas engine in China is evaluated. The waste to energy (WtE) plant based on thermal chemical conversion and gas engine technology include four important issues: preparation of MSW materials, reliable gasification or pyrolysis reactors, gas product processing and availability of gas engine. The state of the arts of these issues have been surveyed and the challenge for implementing WtE process based on gas engine technology has been analysed. It has been found that MSW pretreatment machinery is relatively mature; the gas engine products suitable for syngas are also available. While economic and reliable gasifiers and syngas scrubbing systems are very limited and they are the core challenge for implementing WtE process through gas engine. 1. INTRODUCTION Most of municipal solid wastes (MSW) in big cities in China have been safely disposed through landfilling, incineration and other combined technologies. By the end of year of 2015, 60.2 wt.% of the MSW was disposed in landfills, 29.8 wt.% was incinerated and 1.8 wt.% was composted, there was still 8.2 wt.% of MSW piling on their generating sites and remaining untreated (Speciality committee of urban domestic refuse of CAEPI, 2016). Almost all of the incineration plants in China are equipped with boilers to recover heat released during incineration in form of steam for power generation. However in the small cities and countryside where the generation of MSW are less than 600 tonnes per day, setting up new waste to energy (WtE) plants based on incineration and Rankine cycle technology is difficult due to the economic constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat and Power with Wood Pellets Heat and Power with Wood Pellets Made in Germany
    HEAT AND POWER WITH WOOD PELLETS HEAT AND POWER WITH WOOD PELLETS MADE IN GERMANY Contents 2 . MADE IN GERMANY 4 . PELLETS AS FUEL 6 . WOOD GASIFICATION WITH WOOD PELLETS 8 . COMBINED HEAT AND POWER WITH WOOD GAS 10 . 50 KW WITH WOOD GASIFIER V 4.50 11 . 165 - 180 KW WITH WOOD GASIFIER V 3.90 12 . COMPLETE BUILDING SOLUTIONS 14 . SERVICE 16 . LOCATIONS 18 . REFERENCES From the idea to the production stage Starting out as a classical company for heating and plumbing, operated exclusively with wood pellets, whereby we also offer we ventured into the area of renewable energies with CHPs fu- CHPs with natural gas as an alternative. elled by vegetable oil in 2004. At the same time, we researched ways to convert wood into electricity. We achieved that goal in Thanks to our Research and Development department, we are 2010 with the Burkhardt wood gasifier, which is by now being able to adapt and further develop our products permanently. produced modularly and in series thanks to the continuous op- Furthermore, we are also working on further research projects timization of the processes. In 2014, we received the Bavarian in renewable energies. This means that you can continue to look Energy Award for this development. forward to new interesting products from Burkhardt in the fu- ture, too. In the meantime, our wood gas CHP plants exist in various per- formance classes. Apart from the large machine with up to 180 kW electrical output, we also offer a 50 kW plant. All plants are 2 BURKHARDT . ENERGY AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY HEAT AND POWER WITH WOOD
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Opportunities and Difficulties with HCNG As a Future Fuel for Internal Combustion Engine
    Advances in Aerospace Science and Applications. ISSN 2277-3223 Volume 4, Number 1 (2014), pp. 79-84 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/aasa.htm Review on Opportunities and Difficulties with HCNG as a Future Fuel for Internal Combustion Engine Priyanka Goyal1 and S.K. Sharma2 1Amity Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Amity University, Noida. 2Amity School of Engineering & Technology, Amity University, Noida. Abstract Air pollution is fast becoming a serious global problem with increasing population and its subsequent demands. This has resulted in increased usage of hydrogen as fuel for internal combustion engines. Hydrogen blended with natural gas (HCNG) is a viable alternative to pure fossil fuels because of the effective reduction in total pollutant emissions and the increased engine efficiency. This research note is an assessment of hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas usage in case of internal combustion engines. Several examples and their salient features have been discussed. Finally, overall effects of hydrogen addition on an engine fueled with hydrogen enriched com-pressed natural gas under various conditions are illustrated. In addition, the difficulties to deploy HCNG are clearly described. Keywords: CNG; HCNG; Hydrogen; Emissions. 1. Introduction In today’s modern world, where new technologies are being introduced, use of transportation energy is increasing rapidly. Fossil fuel, particularly petroleum fuel, isthe major contributor to energy production. Fossil fuel consumption is continuously rising as aresult of population growth in addition to improvements in the standard of living. Increased energy demand requires increased fuel production, thus draining current fossil fuel reserve levels at a faster rate. This has resulted in fluctuating oil prices and supply disruptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Evaluation and Assessment of CNG/LPG Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Vehicle Viability C-ACC-4-14042-01
    May 1994 • NRELffP-425-6544 Technical Eval ·on and Assessment of C !LPG Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel V cle Viability J .E. Sinor Consultants, Inc. Niwot, CO •.. •... ···� �=- ·-· ·��-· National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617• Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Operated by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC02-83CH)0093_____ _ _ NRELffP-425-6544 • UC Category: 335 • DE94006925 Technical Evaltil*ion··:·:·:·:·:·:·:·: and ·, Assessment of C , /LPG Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Vell�le Viability J J.E. Sinor Consultants, Inc. Niwot, CO technical monitor: C. Colucci NREL �·� .,!!!!!�-· ·� �--­ .. •.·-· ···� National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory operated for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-83CH10093 Prepared under Subcontract No. ACC-4-14042-01 May 1994 Thispub lication was reproducedfrom thebest available camera-readycopy submitted by the subcontractor and received no editorial review at NREL. NOTICE NOTICE: This reportwas prepared as an accountof work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or processdisclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillar Natural Gas Engines
    CATERPILLAR MINING OIL & GAS NATURAL RAIL MARINE GAS ENGINES ELECTRIC POWER Lower Operating Costs, Proven Performance We’re “all in” on a natural gas-powered future You told us what you want from Caterpillar® engines: fuel flexibility, reduced operating costs and lower emissions. You want to tap into the cost savings of natural gas while retaining the traditional performance and durability of diesel engines. Small wonder: natural gas is abundant, cheap and clean—it fits right in with sustainability trends. Just as important, it is clean burning while providing a real alternative to diesel fuel pricing. And the gas fueling infrastructure is growing. That’s why we are expanding our portfolio of natural gas engines in a variety of applications. We are also extending our technology to customers interested in retrofitting their existing engines. This is a new era where natural gas will be a major fuel source and ringb significant bottom line cost savings to your businesses. Natural Gas Engine Technology Caterpillar is a leader in natural gas technology with thousands of engines operating in the field. We are leveraging our experience and leading technology into other areas. Today, we offer natural gas engines featuring spark ignited and Dynamic Gas Blending technologies. In the future, we will introduce a third technology: high-pressure direct injection (HPDI). In each case, we ensure the right technology is deployed into the right application, fully supporting your goals for performance, safety and reliability. Dynamic Gas Blending Dynamic Gas Blending technology is a proprietary Caterpillar dual fuel technology that uses existing gas engine hardware to allow Caterpillar diesel engines to burn natural gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments to Collect Dimensioning Data for Production of Biogas and Ethanol from Straw
    Experiments to collect dimensioning data for production of biogas and ethanol from straw Graduation Thesis Made by: Judit Szászi Supervisor: Dr. Erik Dahlquist Mälardalen University Department of Public Technology Consultant: Dr. József Kovács University of Pannonia Institute of Environmental Engineering Pannon University Mälardalen University Engineering Faculty School of Sustainable Society and Institute of Technology Development (HST) Environmental Engineering Västerås-Veszprém 2008 THESIS ASSIGNMENT FOR MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS Department Major Institute of Environmental technology Environmental Engineering Title of thesis: Experiments to collect dimensioning data for production of biogas and ethanol from straw Task leading department(s): Supervisor(s): Mälardalen University, Erik Dahlquist School of Sustainable Society and Dr. Kovács József Technology Development (HST) Task to be executed: There is a long project at Malardalens Högskola about preparation bioethanol and biogas from energy crops. During the processing of the available and personally selected literature former experiments should be summarized as well. The procedure of the production of biogas and bioethanol from straw has to be highly emphasized. In the practical research the extraction from straw should be examined considering different conditions such as temperature, pH, and extraction time. Thereafter biogasification is the aim, with bacteria to form CH4 and ethanol fermentation with Saccaromyces will be performed and the gas production measured. On the basis of these experimental results the candidate should trace the main directions of upcoming research. This will give information on rough dimensioning data for a future pilot plant. Special requirements: Well established knowledge of environmental engineering and of English language , the perfection in extraction and fermentation. Deadlines of the distinct parts of the project 1.
    [Show full text]