DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Protection Capital Improvements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Protection Capital Improvements Flood Protection Capital Improvements FLOOD PROTECTION OVERVIEW • Permanente Creek from S.F. Bay to Foothill Of the approximately 800 miles of creeks in Santa Clara Expressway (Safe, Clean Water) County, the District has jurisdiction and manages 275 • San Francisquito Creek from S.F. Bay to Searsville miles to meet the Board’s Ends Policy E–3, “There is a Dam (Clean, Safe Creeks/Safe, Clean Water) healthy and safe environment for residents, businesses and visitors, as well as for future generations.” The West Valley Watershed district’s goals are further defined in E-3.1, “Provide Major Capital Improvements Completed natural flood protection for residents, businesses, • Calabazas Creek from Guadalupe Slough to Wardell and visitors” and E-3.2, “Reduce potential for flood Road damages.” The 275 miles of creeks are located in five • San Tomas Creek from Southern Pacific Railroad to watersheds: Lower Peninsula, West Valley, Guadalupe, Cabrillo Avenue Coyote, and Uvas/Llagas. The District administers an asset management program for its flood protection • Saratoga Creek from San Tomas Creek to infrastructure. The program includes a schedule for Lawrence Expressway maintenance and rehabilitation to ensure that each facility functions as intended throughout its useful life. Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP • Sunnyvale East and West Channels (Clean, Safe Fifty years of working for flood protection has Creeks) significantly reduced the intensity and frequency of flooding in Santa Clara County. By 2005 the District Guadalupe Watershed had provided flood protection to 93,253 of the 166,526 Major Capital Improvements Completed parcels in the flood plain and another approximately • Alamitos Creek 10,442 have been protected since then. • Guadalupe River–Lower from Alviso Marina to The voters in Santa Clara County have supported the Interstate 880 District’s flood protection efforts by approving benefit • Guadalupe River–Downtown from Interstate 880 to assessment funding in 1982, 1986, and 1990. Voters Interstate 280 approved a special parcel tax in 2000 and 2012 to fund the continuation of the District’s flood protection Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP capital improvements, specifically, moving upstream • Guadalupe River–Upper, Interstate 280 to Blossom from the completed downstream work or starting new Hill Road (Clean, Safe Creeks/Safe, Clean Water) work on creeks that have not had flood protection work. • Los Gatos Creek Restoration and Flood Protection Lower Peninsula Watershed (Safe, Clean Water) Major Capital Improvements Completed • Guadalupe River, Tasman Drive to I-880 • Adobe Creek from El Camino to West Edith Ave. Coyote Watershed • Barron Creek Major Capital Improvements Completed • Matadero Creek from Palo Alto Flood Basin to • Coyote Creek from S.F. Bay to Montague Barron Creek Expressway • Stevens Creek from Highway 101 to • Lower Penitencia Creek from Coyote Creek to Homestead Road Tasman Drive • Lower Silver Creek from Coyote Creek to Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP Cunningham Ave. (Reaches 1-6) • Palo Alto Flood Basin Structure Improvements • Wrigley Ford Creek 2020–2024 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program :: III-1 Flood Protection Capital Improvements Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP process and financial analysis are summarized in Appendix B. • Berryessa Creek from Calaveras Boulevard to Old Piedmont Road (Clean, Safe Creeks) Funding required for portions of several CIP projects is • Berryessa Creek from Lower Penitencia Creek to contingent on grants and partnership agreements that Calaveras Boulevard are under development and not currently secured. As the • Coyote Creek Montague Expressway to Tully Road District works through the process to secure funding the (Clean, Safe Creeks/Safe, Clean Water) project schedules may be adjusted. Projects with unsecured funding include: • Upper Penitencia Creek from Coyote Creek to Dorel Drive (Safe, Clean Water) • San Francisquito Creek, u/s Hwy 101 • Upper Llagas, Phase 2 (Reaches 5, 6, 7B, 8, and 14) Uvas/Llagas Watershed • Coyote Creek, Montague Expy. to Tully Road Major Capital Improvements Completed (actual cost will not be known until the planning • Llagas Creek–Lower from Pajaro River to Buena study is completed in January 2020) Vista Road • Uvas Creek It is understood that new capital projects have an impact on future operations and maintenance, and this is included in Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP the financial analysis. Periodically throughout the project, • Llagas Creek Capacity Restoration from Buena projections of this impact are updated to reflect changes in Vista Road to Pajaro River the project elements. • Llagas Creek–Upper, Buena Vista Road to Llagas Road (Clean, Safe Creeks/Safe, Clean Water) Flooding on Coyote Creek caused by severe storm in February 2017 led the District to reevaluate the Multiple Watersheds schedule, level of flood protection, and funding sources Major Capital Improvements Identified in the CIP for the Coyote Creek Project. A public hearing was held on June 13, 2017 to extend the Coyote Creek • San Francisco Bay Shoreline (Safe, Clean Water) project to Tully Road and evaluate a project that would • Watershed Asset Rehabilitation Program provide protection from a 20- to 25-year flood event. Staff worked with the Board CIP Committee to identify PRIORITY PROCESS AND possible funding for construction of this project. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The Fiscal Year 2019-23 priority criteria for evaluating District staff collects high water marks from significant new flood protection projects were carried over to the storm events, conducts topographic surveys and Fiscal Year 2020-24 priority setting process to allow collected information on vegetation growth following time for further discussions on whether changes to the 2017 storm events. The analyses, completed in 2018 the criteria were needed. The priority criteria used are for Lower Guadalupe River, indicate that a section of the included in Appendix A. Lower Guadalupe River, from upstream of Tasman Drive to Airport Parkway, no longer has conveyance capacity A financial analysis of the Watershed and Steam for the 100-year event for which it was designed. The Stewardship Fund and Safe, Clean Water Fund, District is actively exploring options to restore the river the funding sources for flood protection capital to 100-year flow capacity, but there are many challenges improvements, was conducted to determine if there are ahead. Preliminary assessments indicate that vegetation limitations to funding all of the projects proposed for removal as permitted under the existing SMP alone will the Fiscal Year 2020-24 CIP. Results of the prioritization not be enough to restore the design conveyance. The Guadalupe River, Tasman Drive to I-880 Project was, III-2 :: 2020–2024 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Flood Protection Capital Improvements included in the FY 2020-24 CIP to; investigate options for Partially Funded and Unfunded CIP Projects immediate interim measures and to conduct an alternatives • Coyote Creek, Montague Expy. to Tully Road (actual analysis and environmental evaluation of additional measures, cost will not be known until the planning study is such as construction of a floodwall or levee raising to re- completed in January 2020) establish flow conveyance capacity and freeboard for a 100- year event. • San Francisquito Creek 100 year flood protection upstream of Highway 101 The voter approved Safe, Clean Water program is providing • Upper Berryessa Creek, I-680 to Old Piedmont Road funding for some of the highest priority flood protection (unfunded; $20 million) projects including: • Upper Llagas, Reach 14 • Permanente Creek, San Francisco Bay to • Upper Penitencia Creek, Coyote Creek to Dorel Foothill Expy. Drive (USACE funding is unlikely) • San Francisquito Creek, SF Bay to Middlefield Road • Sunnyvale East & West Channels • Upper Guadalupe River, I-280 to Blossom Hill Road • Upper Penitencia Creek, Coyote to Dorel Drive • Berryessa Creek, Calaveras Blvd. to I-680 • Coyote Creek, Montague Expy. to I-280 (Partial funding) • Upper Llagas Creek, Buena Vista Rd. to Llagas Rd. • San Francisco Bay Shoreline - Design and Partial Construction of EIA 11 and Planning for other EIAs • Los Gatos Creek Restoration and Flood Protection An implementation schedule for the Safe, Clean Water projects is available in Appendix E. Delays in the federal funding for many of the USACE projects have extended the schedules beyond the dates committed by the District. Therefore, the District is evaluating the option of proceeding with the local funding option on several of these projects. The following high priority flood protection projects, unfunded or partially funded, are of major concern to meet the Board’s Ends Policy E–3, “There is a healthy and safe environment for residents, businesses and visitors, as well as for future generations.” 2020–2024 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program :: III-3 Flood Protection Capital Improvements The following table is a project funding schedule for flood protection capital improvements resulting from this year’s priority process and financial analysis. Detailed information for each project can be found in this document on the followingThe followin pagesg table isin a theproj eorderct fund ipresentedng schedule infor thisfloo dtable. protec tiTheon c achartpital i malsoprove identifiesments resu ltipartiallyng from thfundedis year's projectspriority pr oandcess aestimatednd financia l unspentanalysis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood Insurance?
    Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program The passage of the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program in 2012 has made the community’s long term goals for protecting the future of the Santa Clara Valley possible, including: • Supplying safe, healthy water • Retrofitting dams and critical infrastructure for earthquakes • Reducing toxins, hazards and contaminants • Restoring wildlife habitat in our waterways • Providing natural flood protection Even though we are in a drought, flooding can happen. Santa Clara County has had several damaging floods over the years, Extreme dry conditions can harden the ground. Within the first few most notably in 1995 and 1997 along the Guadalupe River and 1998 days of heavy rain, the ground can deflect water into streams and along Coyote and San Francisquito creeks. Call your city’s floodplain creeks, increasing the chances of flash flooding. It can strike quickly manager or the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Community with little or no warning. Projects Unit at 408.630.2650 to determine if you are in a floodplain. Floodwater can flow swiftly through neighborhoods and away from The water district’s flood prevention and flood awareness outreach streams when creeks “overbank” or flood. Dangerously fast-moving efforts reduce flood insurance rates by as much as 10 percent. FEMA’s floodwaters can flow thousands of feet away from the flooded creek National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (CRS) within minutes. evaluates the flood protection efforts that CRS communities make and provides a rating. While the chances may seem slim for a 1 percent flood* to occur, the real odds of a 1 percent flood are greater than one in four during the In our area, *participating CRS communities (noted on the magnet) earn length of a 30-year mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José
    Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José Last Revised: December 2018 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José MC14104 December 2018 Executive Summary—Joint Emergency Action Plan Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José MC14104 ii December 2018 Executive Summary—Joint Emergency Action Plan Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José MC14104 iii December 2018 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Joint Emergency Action Plan for Severe Storm and Flood Response in City of San José MC14104 iv December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 A. Purpose of the Joint Emergency Action Plan ...................................................... 1 B. Stakeholders ....................................................................................................... 1 C. Structure of This Emergency Action Plan ............................................................ 2 D. Relationship to Other Plans ................................................................................ 2 E. Definition of a Multi-Agency Coordination Group ................................................. 2 F. Intention of the Organization and Protocols Noted in the Emergency Action Plan.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BAYLANDS & CREEKS South San Francisco
    Oak_Mus_Baylands_SideA_6_7_05.pdf 6/14/2005 11:52:36 AM M12 M10 M27 M10A 121°00'00" M28 R1 For adjoining area see Creek & Watershed Map of Fremont & Vicinity 37°30' 37°30' 1 1- Dumbarton Pt. M11 - R1 M26 N Fremont e A in rr reek L ( o te C L y alien a o C L g a Agua Fria Creek in u d gu e n e A Green Point M a o N l w - a R2 ry 1 C L r e a M8 e g k u ) M7 n SF2 a R3 e F L Lin in D e M6 e in E L Creek A22 Toroges Slou M1 gh C ine Ravenswood L Slough M5 Open Space e ra Preserve lb A Cooley Landing L i A23 Coyote Creek Lagoon n M3 e M2 C M4 e B Palo Alto Lin d Baylands Nature Mu Preserve S East Palo Alto loug A21 h Calaveras Point A19 e B Station A20 Lin C see For adjoining area oy Island ote Sand Point e A Lucy Evans Lin Baylands Nature Creek Interpretive Center Newby Island A9 San Knapp F Map of Milpitas & North San Jose Creek & Watershed ra Hooks Island n Tract c A i l s Palo Alto v A17 q i ui s to Creek Baylands Nature A6 o A14 A15 Preserve h g G u u a o Milpitas l Long Point d a S A10 A18 l u d p Creek l A3N e e i f Creek & Watershed Map of Palo Alto & Vicinity Creek & Watershed Calera y A16 Berryessa a M M n A1 A13 a i h A11 l San Jose / Santa Clara s g la a u o Don Edwards San Francisco Bay rd Water Pollution Control Plant B l h S g Creek d u National Wildlife Refuge o ew lo lo Vi F S Environmental Education Center .
    [Show full text]
  • A Master Plan Report OVERFELT GARDENS a Botanical Garden
    A Master Plan Report for OVERFELT GARDENS a botanical garden SAN JOSE CITY COUNCIL Thomas McEnery Mayor Blanca Alvarado Vice-Mayor/District 5 Lu Ryden District 1 Judy Stabile District 2 Susan Hammer District 3 Shirley Lewis District 4 Nancy Ianni District 6 Iola Williams District 7 Patricia Sausedo District 8 James Beall, Jr. District 9 Joe Head District 10 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Stanley E. Anderson Chairperson Joseph Guerra III Vice-Chairperson Virginia Holtz Commissioner Dr. Paul Brown Commissioner Ron Wood Commissioner Julie Sabadin Commissioner Jerry Strangis Commissioner Dr. Rodger Cryer Commissioner Charles Walton Commissioner CITY ADMINISTRATION Leslie R. White City Manager Robert G. Overstreet Director of Recreation, Parks and Community Services D. Kent Dewell Director of Public Works MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS.................................................................... 29 The Gardens................ 29 Percolation Ponds..................................................;..........................29 Chinese Cultural Garden................................................ •..................30 Botanical Center................................................................................30 Demonstration Garden.......................................................................30 Conservatory..................................................................................... 31 Orientation / Observation Deck........................................................31 Water Garden...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study Appendix B
    Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project Biological Assessment Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation and Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Prepared By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Patrick Boursier, Principal (408) 458-3204 H. T. Harvey & Associates Los Gatos, California Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Solomon Tegegne, Associate Civil Engineer Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Highway and Bridge Design 408-573-2495 Concurred By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Tom Holstein Environmental Branch Chief Office of Local Assistance Caltrans, District 4 Oakland, California 510-286-5250 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to the Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department: Solomon Tegegne Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San Jose, CA 95110 408-573-2495 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (proposed project) is proposed by the County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department in cooperation with the Office of Local Assistance of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and this Biological Assessment (BA) has been prepared following Caltrans’ procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 8: the Current Permitting Process for Projects Proposed on San Francisquito Creek
    SECTION 8: THE CURRENT PERMITTING PROCESS FOR PROJECTS PROPOSED ON SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK 8.1 THE PROJECT PERMITTING PROCESS FOR THE PRIVATE LANDOWNER Creeks are important ecological resources regarded as sensitive habitats. Several federal, state and local agencies oversee regulations that protect creeks in the San Francisco Bay Area. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and San Mateo County Flood Control District are among the agencies requiring permits and other approvals for any project that may affect creek habitat, including bank stabilization. Figure 8A The project planning process A landowner must follow several steps to obtain permits or approvals for a project in or near San Francisquito Creek (‘project’ being defined as Contact Local buildings, bank stabilization projects, grading, major landscaping, pool, Agency/Consult with deck, or wall construction and concrete paving). Currently, he or she Permitting Agencies must contact all appropriate agencies, whether or not the agency ulti- mately will be involved in the proposed project. Local city planning and/ or public works departments can be of assistance in beginning this process and should be contacted as a first step, as illustrated in Figure Review Master Plan’s 8.1. Any landowner planning modifications within fifty feet of the top of Recommendations for Site bank should also consult the recommendations in this Master Plan report to determine potential upstream and downstream impacts. 8.2 CURRENT PERMITTING AGENCIES AND Secure Engineer’s REQUIREMENTS Services City Grading Permits A permit is required for any excavation or fill that will encroach on or alter a natural drainage channel or water course, up to and including the Develop Design top of bank.
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 Cov Final Vol 1.Ai
    Summary Summary SUMMARY Sections Figures Tables S.1 Introduction and Purpose of S.1 Overview of SFPUC Regional S.1 WSIP Goals and Objectives the PEIR System and Water Supply Watersheds S.2 WSIP Facility Improvement S.2 Program Description Projects S.2 SFPUC Water Service Area – S.3 Environmental Effects San Francisco and SFPUC S.3 Summary of WSIP Facility Construction and Operation S.4 Areas of Controversy and Wholesale Customers Impacts Issues to be Resolved S.3 Annual Average Historical and S.4 Summary of Facility Mitigation S.5 Required Actions and Projected Customer Purchase Measures by Impact Approvals Requests S.5 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6 WSIP Variants S.4 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Nondrought Years and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Alternatives to the Proposed Tuolumne River System and Program S.5 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Downstream Water Bodies Drought Years S.6 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6a Location of WSIP Facility and Mitigation Measures – Improvement Projects – Sunol Alameda Creek Watershed Valley, Bay Division, Peninsula, and San Francisco Regions S.7 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6b Location of WSIP Facility Peninsula Watersheds Improvement Projects – San Joaquin Region S.8 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6c Location of WSIP Facility Westside Groundwater Basin Improvement Projects – Hetch Hetchy Region S.9 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Preliminary WSIP Construction Cumulative Water Supply Schedule S.1 Introduction and Purpose of the PEIR (Chapter 1) The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to adopt and implement the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP or proposed program) to increase the reliability of the regional water system that serves 2.4 million people in San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Calendar and Fiscal Year 2018–19 Annual Report
    2020 CALENDAR AND FISCAL YEAR 2018–19 ANNUAL REPORT Vasona Reservoir Vasona Lake County Park Clean Water Healthy Environment Flood Protection 2 Santa Clara Valley Water District | Fiscal Year 2018–19 Annual Report Calero Reservoir The Santa Clara Valley Water District is now known as Valley Water Led by a seven-member elected board of directors, Valley Water is charged with providing safe, clean water, a healthy environment, and flood protection for the people of Santa Clara County. A healthy environment and a healthy economy rely on clean water, clean streams and efforts to reduce the risk of flooding. Here for you is an accounting of what Valley Water accomplished in fiscal year 2018–19 to protect and enhance our water supply, the environment and flood protection in Santa Clara County. Highlights of the Year We are now Valley Water • After more than 40 years with the same logo, Valley Water water supply. The inclusion of green better represents Valley celebrated its 90th year by modernizing its name and visual Water’s environmental stewardship mission. brand to emphasize our forward-looking, environmentally • The new tagline, “Clean water · Healthy environment · Flood conscious approach to water resources management. protection,” is intended to concisely represent the core • The new logo is intended to better represent the full functions of Valley Water. mission of Valley Water. The top of drop evokes the valley’s • The official name of the agency will remain Santa Clara mountain peaks, while the swoosh in the middle represents Valley Water District, but Valley Water will be used as a our local streams.
    [Show full text]
  • R-18-35 Meeting 18-14 April 11, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM Proposed Purchase of the 23760 Alamitos Road, LLC Property As An
    R-18-35 Meeting 18-14 April 11, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM Proposed purchase of the 23760 Alamitos Road, LLC Property as an addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve located at 23760 Alamitos Road, San Jose in unincorporated Santa Clara County, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 562-23-007. ACTING GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Determine that the recommended actions are categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, as set out in the staff report. 2. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the purchase of the 23760 Alamitos Road, LLC property at a cost of $2,800,000 with corresponding authorization for a Fiscal Year 2017-18 budget increase of the same amount. 3. Adopt a Preliminary Use and Management Plan for the property, as set out in the staff report. 4. Withhold dedication of the 23760 Alamitos Road, LLC property as public open space. 5. Authorize the Acting General Manager to enter into a grant agreement with the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to receive $750,000 for property acquisition costs. SUMMARY The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) has an opportunity to purchase the 153.59-acre 23760 Alamitos Road, LLC property (Property) at a price of $2,800,000 as an addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve (Preserve). The property offers high natural resource, wildlife connectivity, and trail connectivity value and the potential to recover sensitive riparian habitat through creek restoration work. Time is of the essence and avoidance of a foreclosure sale is why this item is coming to the Board of Directors at this time to allow the District to enter into a purchase agreement.
    [Show full text]