DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenpeace International Annual Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL REPORT 2015 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL 2 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL REPORT 2015 A Message from the Greenpeace International Executive Directors 3 Greenpeace International’s Board of Directors 4 A Message from the Board Chair 5 Greenpeace’s Global Programme 6 Climate & Energy 7 Detox 10 Food for Life 12 Forests 14 Oceans 17 Save the Arctic 20 People Power 22 Greenpeace International Organisation Director’s Report 25 Greenpeace International Abbreviated Financial Statements 26 Greenpeace Worldwide Abbreviated Financial Statements 28 Environmental Report 29 Our People 30 Office Contact Details 31 The global Greenpeace organisation consists of Greenpeace International and 26 national and regional Greenpeace organisations, which are all separate and independent legal entities. In this annual report “Greenpeace” could be used for convenience purposes where references are made to either Greenpeace International or one of Projection on the the national or regional Greenpeace organisations. Moreover, the words Moorburg coal-fired “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to our partners in the Greenpeace power plant in Germany, network and their respective staff, activists and volunteers. These terms protesting the high could also be used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the mercury emission of the specific independent Greenpeace entity. Vattenfall-owned plant. © Fred Dott / Greenpeace 3 A MESSAGE FROM THE GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS Greenpeace is on a transformational path. Our world The Forest campaign celebrated when the deforestation is changing faster than at any other time in human history. law was delivered to the Brazilian Congress and the soya We have witnessed rapid changes in the health of our moratorium was once again extended. In Indonesia, planet from our oceans to the atmosphere, in economic President Jokowi announced a two year extension of the growth, technological innovation and our increasing forest clearance moratorium and RGE Group, a major interconnectedness via the internet and on social media. pulp-and-paper company, announced a new sustainability These forces drive our organisational change, and in 2015 policy. The Oceans campaign saw the UN commit to Greenpeace continued to implement a new way of working, develop a High Seas Biodiversity Agreement. In Mexico, so that we become an organisation that is more enabling, there was a two-year fishing ban in the vaquita habitat. The more engaged and more effective as we look ahead to tuna campaign was also able to highlight the link between the next 10 years. industrial fishing and human rights abuses. During the year, Greenpeace International facilitated the When Shell announced its withdrawal from the Arctic, development and agreement of the global organisation’s the Save the Arctic campaign with more than 8 million strategy. Working with the Greenpeace National & supporters could point to our collective role in making that Regional Organisations (NROs) we developed core a reality. The #PaddleinSeattle action saw 2,000 people shared systems and services, ensuring alignment, take to the water in protest and we hosted an Indigenous monitoring and evaluation and learning across the delegation from British Columbia on board our ship to lead global organisation. In addition, we continued to build the protest against Shell’s oil rig heading to the Arctic. relationships with other groups and communities where we had common cause. The challenges to protect the life support systems of the planet that our own fates are so intimately connected to In this Annual Report Greenpeace International will provide are greater today than yesterday. So we ask: How can a topline overview of the activities undertaken by the we bolster our campaigns to meet these challenges, and global Greenpeace network in 2015. As you will read, remain ever-hopeful resilient and grounded? The answer Greenpeace moved further towards “people-powered” is people. From activists, volunteers and supporters to staff campaigning, engaging and working alongside others to and alumni, our partners and collaborators in other change make change in their own backyards. More and more we organisations, people and their courage are at the heart are also focusing our attention on what the root causes of of our campaigns. When the best parts of our humanity issues are so that we can design our campaigns to tackle collaborate we can be a force of nature for the common what is creating the problems in the first place, or holding good. When we combine our voices we can speak truth back the solutions. to power with more volume and more courage than ever before. The Paris Climate Agreement marked the beginning of the end for fossil fuels and is the catalyst towards 100% Thank you so much for everything you do. renewable energy. We are proud that our role in mass mobilisation was significant while we continued to push governments and corporations towards coal divestment and greater investment in renewables. There were big wins for the Detox campaign: the EU banned a group of hazardous chemicals still allowed in textile production in China, major German discount retailers committed to phasing out hazardous chemicals and to address over-consumption and the Mexican ship tour raised awareness around increasing e-waste. The Food For Life campaign was also successful, with 19 EU Jennifer Morgan and Bunny McDiarmid countries banning GMO cultivation. Greenpeace International Executive Directors © Bas Beentjes / Greenpeace 4 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS Term of office: Term of office: Term of office: Term of office: First Elected: 2011 First Elected: 2012 First Elected: 2013 First Elected: 2014 Term Ends: 2017 Term Ends: 2018 Term Ends: 2019 Term Ends: 2017 ANA TONI (BOARD CHAIR) ED HARRINGTON (TREASURER) THULI MAKAMA ATHENA RONQUILLO-BALLESTEROS Ana is Partner in the GIP (Public Interest Management) (Public Ed is currently an adjunct professor at the University of San Thuli, a graduate of the University of Swaziland and the London Athena is a passionate activist from the Philippines and currently based Interest Management Research and Consultant) www.gip.net.br. Francisco, is a consultant on government finance issues and serves School of Economics, is Advocate (Senior Counsel) of the High in Washington DC. She is currently Director of WRI’s Sustainable on various non-profit boards. He was General Manager of the San Court of Swaziland and Member of the Law Society of Swaziland. Finance Program, which works to improve the environmental and From 2003 until May 2011, Ana Toni was the Representative for Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) until his retirement Combining law and advocacy, Thuli Makama has engaged in public social decision making and performance of public and private the Ford Foundation in Brazil, during which time she oversaw in September 2012. The SFPUC provides water to 2.5 million interest environmental law challenges against powerful multinational financial institutions. Athena has over fifteen years of leadership and the Foundation’s work in the areas of human rights, sustainable customers in the San Francisco Bay Area along with sewer and corporations and her government in defence of environmental and management experience in environment, development and natural development, racial and ethical discrimination, sexuality and stormwater services in San Francisco and hydroelectric and solar human rights of local communities. resource governance in developing countries, with a particular focus reproductive health, media democratization and land rights. She power generation for municipal purposes in the City. The SFPUC on climate change, clean energy and sustainable finance. She is a was also responsible for coordinating the regional Latin America has 2,300 employees, an operating budget of $800m US dollars She has over seventeen years’ experience on governance in the not- long-time policy advisor to the Philippines government’s official climate funding on Economics and Globalization, the IBSA initiative (joint and is in the middle of a $4.6bn rebuild of the water system. for-profit sector, having served as Deputy Chair of the Open Society change negotiating team at the UN Framework Convention on Climate work between Brazil, South Africa and India) and the International Initiative Southern Africa, Treasurer of IUCN World Conservation Change (UNFCCC) and has assisted various Philippines ministries on Initiative on Intellectual Property Rights. During the four and a half years that Ed was General Manager of the Union Eastern and Southern Africa board, Ombudsman of Friends of climate, energy and finance issues at key international sessions such SFPUC, he was also the Chair of the Water Utility Climate Alliance the Earth International, member of Coordinating Board of Friends of From 1998 to 2002 Ana was the Executive Director of ActionAid as the Asia Pacific Summit for Economic Cooperation (APEC); ASEAN composed of 10 large water utilities in the US with 45 million the Earth Africa, Trustee at groundWork - Friends of the Earth South and World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). She has Brazil; working to contribute in the eradication of poverty and customers, focused on providing leadership and collaboration on Africa, Chair of the Coordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental inequality through community development projects, as well published widely on the issue of climate change, climate finance, clean climate change issues
Recommended publications
  • Combined Financial Statements

    Combined Financial Statements

    GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL AND RELATED ENTITIES COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year ended 31 December 2013 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL & RELATED. ENTITIES Combined Financial Statements Year ended 31 December 2013 Contents Page: 2. Greenpeace International Organisation Directors’ report Financial statements 4. Combined Statement of Financial Position 5. Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income for the period 6. Combined Statement of Changes of Equity in the period 7. Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the period 8. Notes to the Combined Financial Statements Other information 30. Appropriation of result 30. Independent auditors’ report 1 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL & RELATED ENTITIES Greenpeace International Organisation Director’s Report 2013 was a year of significant change. Proposals for the new operating model, a Greenpeace global resource plan for 2014-2016 and new contribution model were all approved, and will make Greenpeace a more efficient and effective organisation, better able to deliver its goals. It was also a year of major achievements. • The policies, committees, processes, and extra Human Resource staff were put in place to manage major restructuring and reorganization of Greenpeace International and manage the change process; • New executive directors were recruited for Mexico and Canada, and we are glad to welcome them to the Greenpeace family. • The first wave of three-year plans for NROs (national and regional organisations) began, in line with the changes of the new operating model. • The review of the global leadership team was thorough and efficient, and organisational accountability processes are more effective and streamlined. • We agreed a global Performance, Accountability and Learning (PAL) function with an organisation- wide consensus on its role and started the process of establishing a full-fledged PAL unit in Greenpeace International.
  • An Investigation Report Into China's Marine Trash Fish Fisheries

    An Investigation Report Into China's Marine Trash Fish Fisheries

    An investigation report into China’s marine trash fish fisheries Media Briefing Greenpeace East Asia The past 30 years have witnessed the aggravation of overfishing as the biggest obstacle for the sustainable development of China's domestic marine fisheries. The official data for China’s marine total allowance catch is 8 to 9 million tons every year1. However, according to China Fisheries Statistic Year Book, China’s marine catch exceed this limit and kept growing since 1994. In 2015, China's marine catch reached 13.14 million tons. Greenpeace East Asia observations show that, although the volume of catch and value of China’s fishing industry has maintained stability overall, its structure has undergone massive changes over the last 50 years. A large part of the total marine catch is now 2 comprised of so called “trash fish” , a mixture of juvenile and undersized fish. Mass fishing of trash fish is causing further damage to China’s coastal marine ecosystem and hindering the much-needed structural adjustment of domestic fisheries. Now we have encountered new opportunities under China’s 13th five year plan, with new policy frameworks in place and ambitious management goals put forward. Tackling trash fish is key to promoting China’s sustainable fisheries development, protecting the marine ecosystem and promoting a sustainable marine economy. In order to better understand China’s trash fish fisheries, Greenpeace East Asia conducted on-site sampling surveys at 22 fishing ports located across the 8 main fishing 3 provinces in the country, including questionnaires for local fishermen, random sampling of trash fish, and collection and analysis of previously documented data and statistics.
  • Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: the Making of a Sensible Environmentalist

    Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: the Making of a Sensible Environmentalist

    An Excerpt from Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist ou could call me a Greenpeace dropout, but that is not an entirely accurate Ydescription of how or why I left the organization 15 years after I helped create it. I’d like to think Greenpeace left me, rather than the other way around, by but that too is not entirely correct. Patrick The truth is Greenpeace and I underwent divergent evolutions. I became Moore a sensible environmentalist; Greenpeace became increasingly senseless as it adopted an agenda that is antiscience, antibusiness, and downright antihuman. This is the story of our transformations. The last half of the 20th century was marked by a revulsion for war and a new awareness of the environment. Beatniks, hippies, eco-freaks, and greens in their turn fashioned a new philosophy that embraced peace and ecology as the overarching principles of a civilized world. Spurred by more than 30 years of ever-present fear that global nuclear holocaust would wipe out humanity and much of the living world, we led a new war—a war to save the earth. I’ve had the good fortune to be a general in that war. My boot camp had no screaming sergeant or rifle drills. Still, the sense of duty and purpose of mission we had at the beginning was as acute as any assault on a common enemy. We campaigned against the bomb-makers, whale-killers, polluters, and anyone else who threatened civilization or the environment. In the process we won the hearts and minds of people around the world.
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

    1 LEXINGTON LAW GROUP Howard Hirsch, State Bar No. 213209 2 Ryan Berghoff, State Bar No. 308812 Meredyth Merrow, State Bar No. 328337 3 503 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94117 4 Telephone: (415) 913-7800 Facsimile: (415) 759-4112 5 [email protected] [email protected] 6 [email protected] 7 LAW OFFICE OF GIDEON KRACOV Gideon Kracov, State Bar No. 179815 8 801 S. Grand Ave., 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 9 Telephone: (213) 629-2071 Facsimile: (213) 623-7755 10 [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff GREENPEACE, INC. 12 13 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 15 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 16 17 GREENPEACE, INC., Case No. 18 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT 19 v. 20 WALMART, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, 21 inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 DOCUMENT PREPARED ON RECYCLED PAPER COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiff Greenpeace, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or“Greenpeace”), based on information, belief, and 2 investigation of its counsel, except for information based on knowledge, hereby alleges: 3 INTRODUCTION 4 1. The problems associated with plastic pollution are increasing on a local, national, 5 and global scale. This affects the amount of plastic in the ocean, in freshwater lakes and streams, 6 on land, and in landfills. Nearly 90% of plastic waste is not recycled, with billions of tons of 7 plastic becoming trash and litter.1 According to a new study, at least 1.2 to 2.5 million tons of 8 plastic trash from the United States was dopped on lands, rivers, lakes and oceans as litter, were 9 illegally dumped, or shipped abroad and then not properly disposed of.2 As consumers become 10 increasingly aware of the problems associated with plastic pollution, they are increasingly 11 susceptible to marketing claims reassuring them that the plastic used to make and package the 12 products that they purchase are recyclable.
  • [Daniel, 14, Santiago, Chile] Vision Fr Movemen N T

    [Daniel, 14, Santiago, Chile] Vision Fr Movemen N T

    2002 [Daniel, 14, Santiago, Chile] vision fr movemen n t oceans ancient forests climate toxics nuclear power and disarmament genetic engineering [featuring year 2001 financial statements] 2001financial year [featuring [Bill Nandris, one of the‘Star Wars 17’] 1 greenpeace 2002 brunt of environmental degradation of environmental brunt It is the poor that normally bear the It is the poor that normally “ shatter spirit In Brazil, with great The situation is serious, but Summit’s innovative economics and the actions fanfare, governments set not hopeless. On the plus Agenda 21 – millions of of states are pulling in a out on the ‘road to side, the past decade has people around the world quite different direction. sustainability’. But most of seen the adoption of are tackling local Individuals, businesses and them have now ground to a significant environmental environmental issues with countries have a choice. halt, mired in inaction and legislation at national and dedication, energy and no We can have limitless cars As I write this, final preparations are underway for the Earth Summit in Johannesburg. in Summit Earth the for underway are this, preparations write final I As a return to ‘business as international levels and an small measure of expertise. and computers, plastics usual’.The road from Rio is increasing ecological In schools, children from and air-freighted knee-deep in shattered awareness among policy virtually every country are vegetables, but in exchange promises, not least the makers and scientists. learning about the we get Bhopal and craven caving-in by the But perhaps most environment and its Chernobyl, species USA to the interests of the significant of all is the importance for their future.
  • Fukushima Daiichi 2011-2021 the Decontamination Myth and a Decade of Human Rights Violations

    Fukushima Daiichi 2011-2021 the Decontamination Myth and a Decade of Human Rights Violations

    Fukushima Daiichi 2011-2021 The decontamination myth and a decade of human rights violations March 2021 01 Contents Executive summary 1 The reality of contamination in Fukushima 2 The decontamination myth 3 Greenpeace surveys 4 Areas where evacuation orders have been lifted – Iitate and Namie 5 Iitate district 6 Namie town and district 7 Namie ‘difficult-to-return’ exclusion zone 8 Strontium-90 – an additional threat 9 Ten years of evacuation, displacement and human rights violations 10 The future of difficult-to-return exclusion zones 11 Conclusion and recommendations Endnotes Cover: Nuclear waste storage area in Iitate, Fukushima prefecture. (October 1, 2017) Page 2-3: Greenpeace survey team in Namie, Fukushima prefecture. (March 26, 2011) © Christian Åslund / Greenpeace 02 Acknowledgements Radiation survey team 2020 Report team 2021 Coordinator and Lead Radiation Protection: Survey data compilation: Jan Vande Putte, Greenpeace Belgium Mai Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan and Mai Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan Researcher: Daisuke Miyachi, Greenpeace Japan Report and analysis : Shaun Burnie, Greenpeace East Asia; Technical support: Jan Vande Putte, Greenpeace Jan vande Putte, Greenpeace Belgium; and Heinz Smital, Belgium and Heinz Smital, Greenpeace Germany Greenpeace Germany Communication/photography support: Review and Editing: Dr Rianne Teule (Greenpeace RPA Mitsuhisa Kawase, Greenpeace Japan coordinator); Kazue Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan; Insung Lee, Greenpeace East Asia; Caroline Roberts Survey teams 2011-2020 Photographs: Christian Aslund; Shaun
  • Annual Report 2013

    Annual Report 2013

    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL CONTENTS 01 Message from the Executive Director 03 02 Message from our Board Chair 04 Our Board Of Directors 05 03 The Global Programme 06 A new way of working 08 The Greenpeace fleet 10 Renewing energy 12 Saving the Arctic 14 Saving the Arctic: The Arctic 30 16 Protecting our forests 20 Defending our oceans 22 Detoxing our world 24 Celebrating ecological food and farming 26 04 People power 28 Our dedicated volunteers 30 Your support: Thank you! 32 05 Organisation Director’s report 36 Greenpeace worldwide abbreviated financial statements 38 Greenpeace International abbreviated financial statements 42 Environmental report 46 Staff members on permanent contract 48 06 Office contact details 50 Written and edited by: Matt Farquharson, Edwin Nichols. We would also like to thank everybody who contributed to this Annual Report. Art Direction and Design by: Atomo Design www.atomodesign.nl Cover image: © Daniel Beltrá / Greenpeace JN 472 © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace 2 Greenpeace International Annual Report 2013 SECTION MESSAGE 01 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Campaigning for a peaceful, just and green future is no longer the job of a specialised few, but the common struggle of all. As the distance between rich and poor grows, and the grip of old power systems wreaks ever more havoc on the natural world, our struggle will and must intensify. The old, polluting industries will not give up without a fight. They have had several hundred years at the top, they exert a corrupting influence at every level of our governments and institutions. We must break their grip on all forms of power.
  • 2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor

    2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor

    From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)

    Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)

    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
  • Sustainability Funds Hardly Direct Capital Towards Sustainability

    Sustainability Funds Hardly Direct Capital Towards Sustainability

    Sustainability Funds Hardly Direct Capital Towards Sustainability Greenpeace-Briefing, original inrate study (pdf) Zurich & Luxembourg, Contact: June 21, 2021 Larissa Marti, Greenpeace Switzerland; Martina Holbach, Greenpeace Luxemburg 2/ 6 As a globalised society in a climate emergency, we need to transition to an economic model that is sustainable and equitable. For societies, industries and corporations to undertake this systemic task of adopting a green and just business model successfully, we need capital – and lots of it. Investors have a choice to make. They can continue to invest in fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive sectors, and by doing so face physical, legal and transition risks1, while exac- erbating the climate crisis. Or they can redirect funding to green companies and projects, thus both contributing to and profiting from a transition to economic sustainability, innovation and job creation. Consumer sentiment appears to encourage the second option. The demand for green financial products has skyrocketed over the past few years and continues to grow. But are sustainable investment funds really able to attract capital and invest them in eco-friendly pro- jects? Can they redirect financial flows into having a positive effect on the environment and our societies? Looking to answer these questions, Greenpeace Switzerland and Greenpeace Luxem- bourg commissioned a study from Inrate, an independent Swiss sustainability rating agency, to investigate whether sustainable investments are actually channelling capital into a sustainable economy. Key findings Sustainability funds in Switzerland and Luxembourg do not sufficiently support the redirection of capital into sustainable activities. The current sustainable investment approaches need to be questioned by all stakeholders.
  • The Two-Tiered System: Discrimination, Modern Slavery And

    The Two-Tiered System: Discrimination, Modern Slavery And

    © Jiri Rezac / Greenpeace Briefing The Two-Tiered System: Discrimination, Modern Slavery and Environmental Destruction on the High Seas Inaugural Plenary Meeting of the ILO SEA Forum for Fishers 25-26 September 2019, Bali, Indonesia Introduction Greenpeace welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Inaugural Plenary Meeting of the ILO SEA Forum for Fishers. The issue of discrimination in the global distant water fishing (DWF) industry and the attendant harm inflicted on migrant fishers and our ocean is not new. Yet, the ASEAN Community, especially the countries of origin of workers aboard the Taiwanese and South Korean DWF fleets, has long allowed unequal treatment and associated human rights violations despite numerous commitments to promoting and protecting the human rights of its people, as well as preserving the marine environment. The 2018 Global Slavery Index (GSI) identified high levels of vessel and fuel subsidies provided by national governments as one of six risk factors for modern slavery in the global fishing industry.1 The “two-tiered system” used by Taiwan and South Korea to exclude migrant fishers in their DWF fleets from the scope of protection of national labor or employment laws is a de facto labor subsidy and should be considered a seventh risk factor. According to the GSI, “high subsidies indicate a lack of competitiveness in a country’s fishing industry and suggest likely pressure to cut costs.”2 The two- tiered system was developed precisely to cut costs as the Taiwanese and South Korean DWF fleets would find it more challenging to maintain an edge on their competitors – and satisfy the demands of buyers – if their migrant crew were paid the national minimum wage and afforded the same rights and benefits as Taiwanese and South Korean crew.
  • Anthropocene Futures: Linking Colonialism and Environmentalism

    Anthropocene Futures: Linking Colonialism and Environmentalism

    Special issue article EPD: Society and Space 2020, Vol. 38(1) 111–128 Anthropocene futures: ! The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: Linking colonialism and sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0263775818806514 environmentalism in journals.sagepub.com/home/epd an age of crisis Bruce Erickson University of Manitoba, Canada Abstract The universal discourse of the Anthropocene presents a global choice that establishes environ- mental collapse as the problem of the future. Yet in its desire for a green future, the threat of collapse forecloses the future as a site for creatively reimagining the social relations that led to the Anthropocene. Instead of examining structures like colonialism, environmental discourses tend to focus instead on the technological innovation of a green society that “will have been.” Through this vision, the Anthropocene functions as a geophysical justification of structures of colonialism in the services of a greener future. The case of the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement illustrates how this crisis of the future is sutured into mainstream environmentalism. Thus, both in the practices of “the environment in crisis” that are enabled by the Anthropocene and in the discourse of geological influence of the “human race,” colonial structures privilege whiteness in our environmental future. In this case, as in others, ecological protection has come to shape the political life of colonialism. Understanding this relationship between environmen- talism and the settler state in the Anthropocene reminds us that