United States Patent Office
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Invasive Stink Bugs and Related Species (Pentatomoidea) Biology, Higher Systematics, Semiochemistry, and Management
Invasive Stink Bugs and Related Species (Pentatomoidea) Biology, Higher Systematics, Semiochemistry, and Management Edited by J. E. McPherson Front Cover photographs, clockwise from the top left: Adult of Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood), Photograph by Ted C. MacRae; Adult of Murgantia histrionica (Hahn), Photograph by C. Scott Bundy; Adult of Halyomorpha halys (Stål), Photograph by George C. Hamilton; Adult of Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister), Photograph by C. Scott Bundy; Adult of Megacopta cribraria (F.), Photograph by J. E. Eger; Mating pair of Nezara viridula (L.), Photograph by Jesus F. Esquivel. Used with permission. All rights reserved. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2018 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed on acid-free paper International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4987-1508-9 (Hardback) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materi- als or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, micro- filming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. -
Final Project Report
Contestant profile ▪ Contestant name: Jana Růžičková ▪ Contestant occupation: Postdoctoral fellow ▪ University / Organisation Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc 17. Listopadu 50, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group Eötvös Loránd University, Biological Institute Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary ▪ Number of people in your team: 5 Project overview Title: Hrabůvka quarry: a potential refuge of rare species Contest: (Research/Community) Research Quarry name: Hrabůvka 1/3 Hrabůvka quarry: a potential refuge of rare species Jana Růžičková, Lenka Harmáčková, Michal Hykel, Ondřej Popelka & Vojtěch Taraška Abstract The main aim of this project was to conduct a biological survey in Hrabůvka quarry with an emphasis to south part of the quarry premises called Bobroviště. Specifically, this area is composed of various habitats, including forests, open soils, ruderal habitats and a sewage water body. Based on our findings, we suggest appropriate interventions or changes in management to support and enhance local biodiversity. Our results showed that species composition of plants and animals in the quarry premises is characterized mostly by common species (with only few plant taxa exception) without any specific habitat requirements. We found that the most botanically valuable habitats in Bobroviště are the forest fragment and the spring with its immediate vicinity. Since wetland habitats became valuable in the respect of climate changes in the last few years, we suggest creating new ponds and a littoral zone in the sewage water body to enhance biodiversity of this area and consequently increase water retention in the landscape. Introduction Mining areas are often perceived by the public as a scar on the landscape. -
View the PDF File of the Tachinid Times, Issue 12
The Tachinid Times ISSUE 12 February 1999 Jim O’Hara, editor Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Biological Resources Program Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Correspondence: [email protected] The Tachinid Times began in 1988 when personal Evolution of Egg Structure in Tachinidae (by S.P. computers were gaining in popularity, yet before the Gaponov) advent of e-mail and the World Wide Web. A newsletter Using a scanning electron microscope I investigated distributed through the mail seemed like a useful the egg structure of 114 species of Tachinidae. The endeavour to foster greater awareness about the work of research was focused on the peculiarities of the egg others among researchers interested in the Tachinidae. surface and the structure of the aeropylar area. Data on Now, eleven years later, despite the speed and the method of egg-laying, the structure of the female convenience of e-mail and other advanced modes of reproductive system and the host range were also taken communication, this newsletter still seems to hold a place into consideration. Since any kind of adaptation is a in the distribution of news about the Tachinidae. If there result of evolution and every stage of ontogenesis, is sufficient interest - and submissions - over the course including the egg stage, is adapted to some specific of the next year, then another issue will appear in environmental conditions, each stage of ontogenesis February of the new millennium. As always, please send evolved more or less independently. The development of me your news for inclusion in the newsletter before the provisionary devices (coenogenetic adaptations) and their end of next January. -
REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ ..................................................................................................................................... -
The Importance of Vegetation Configuration in Coastal
Biology Department Research Group Terrestrial Ecology _____________________________________________________________________________________ THE IMPORTANCE OF VEGETATION CONFIGURATION IN COASTAL DUNES TO PRESERVE DIVERSITY OF MARRAM- ASSOCIATED INVERTEBRATES IS HABITAT CONFIGURATION A DRIVER OF DIVERSITY IN DUNES? Noëmie Van den Bon Studentnumber: 01506438 Supervisor(s): Prof. Dr. Dries Bonte Dr. Martijn Vandegehuchte Scientific tutor: Ruben Van De Walle Master’s dissertation submitted to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Biology Academic year: 2019 - 2020 © Faculty of Sciences – research group Terrestrial Ecology All rights reserved. This thesis contains confidential information and confidential research results that are property to the UGent. The contents of this master thesis may under no circumstances be made public, nor complete or partial, without the explicit and preceding permission of the UGent representative, i.e. the supervisor. The thesis may under no circumstances be copied or duplicated in any form, unless permission granted in written form. Any violation of the confidential nature of this thesis may impose irreparable damage to the UGent. In case of a dispute that may arise within the context of this declaration, the Judicial Court of Gent only is competent to be notified. 2 Table of content 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. The status of biodiversity and ecosystems .......................................................................................... -
6.3 ES Appendix
Environmental Statement Appendix 9 .C (6.3.9.3) Invertebrate Survey Report April 2016 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Commissioned by Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd 3rd Floor Manning House 22 Carlisle Place SW1P 1JA INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT Report number BS/2864/14 January 2015 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 14 West Road Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 3QP 01279-507697 [email protected] Page 3 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colin Plant Associates (UK) are pleased to credit the input of the following in-house personnel: Field work for this project has been undertaken by Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Colin W. Plant Identification of samples has been undertaken by many parties, prominent amongst which are Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Norman F. Hall* Edward Milner* Colin W. Plant Derek (“Del”) Smith* *denotes an external expert Page 4 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 7 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... -
Annual Wildflower Strips As a Tool for Enhancing Functional Biodiversity
agronomy Article Annual Wildflower Strips as a Tool for Enhancing Functional Biodiversity in Rye Fields in an Organic Cultivation System Krzysztof Kujawa 1,*, Zdzisław Bernacki 1, Jolanta Kowalska 2 , Anna Kujawa 1, Maria Oleszczuk 1, Paweł Sienkiewicz 3 and Dariusz Sobczyk 1 1 Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, 60-809 Pozna´n, Poland; [email protected] (Z.B.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (M.O.); [email protected] (D.S.) 2 Department of Organic Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława W˛egorka20, 60-318 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Pozna´nUniversity of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 September 2020; Accepted: 30 October 2020; Published: 2 November 2020 Abstract: Ecological intensification of agriculture (e.g., with the use of wildflower strips) is being currently discussed as a mean for gaining high yields, preserving high biodiversity of farmland. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of annual wildflower strips (WFSs) established in rye field (RF) in (1) increasing species richness and abundance in terms of beneficial arthropod groups (carabids, ground spiders, plant spiders, butterflies, insect pollinators and plant-dwelling insect predators), (2) decreasing the abundance of insect pests, (3) decreasing damages of the crop, and (4) increasing the yield. The field survey was carried out in 2019, in two WFSs and in the adjacent crop field at the distances of 3, 9, 21 and 45 m. -
Sap Sucking Insect Pests of Grain CP
Generic Contingency Plan Exotic sap-sucking pests of grain Specific examples detailed in this plan: Black bean aphid (Aphis fabae), Wheat thrips (Haplothrips tritici), and Greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) Plant Health Australia May 2015 Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts have been made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Level 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available from the web site listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2015 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. -
Autumn 2009 Het News 2Nd Series Newsletter of the UK Heteroptera Recording Schemes
Issue 14 Autumn 2009 Het News 2nd Series Newsletter of the UK Heteroptera Recording Schemes Circulation: An informal email newsletter circulated periodically to those interested in Heteroptera. Copyright: Text & drawings © 2009 Authors Photographs © 2009 Photographers Citation: Het News, 2nd Series, no.14, Autumn 2009 Editorial: In the spring issue we remarked upon the sparsity of bugs, and contributions, for the two previous years. We can now extend that by another year and again we attribute this to adverse weather in the British Isles during the main het hunting season. Having just completed the editing of the current issue (well almost!) we would like to ask that contributors simplify our task in future by following the formatting style of similar contributions in the present issue. We are hoping that by the time of the next issue we may be able to announce some improvements to the Het recording schemes. Not least, rationalising the scope of ‘water bugs’ to include all of the first 94 species of the current British checklist. This involves the addition of 3 dipsocorids anteriorly, and 23 saldids posteriorly. The 1st volume of the het atlas of The Netherlands created a sensible precedent for this! Sheila Brooke: 18 Park Hill Toddington Dunstable Beds LU5 6AW — [email protected] Bernard Nau: 15 Park Hill Toddington Dunstable Beds LU5 6AW — [email protected] Contents NOTICES SPECIES NOTES ....................................................................7 Saunders 1892 book available online ...............................3 -
Sunn Pest (Eurygaster Integriceps PUTON, Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) and Its Scelionid (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoids in Iran
© Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 42/2 1421-1435 19.12.2010 Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps PUTON, Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) and its scelionid (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoids in Iran N. SAMIN, M. SHOJAI, S. ASGARI, H. GHAHARI & E. KOCAK Abstract: Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps PUTON (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) is the main pest in wheat fields of Iran. The list of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera) and Tachinidae (Diptera) as the parasitoids of sunn pest are summarized in this paper. Totally 19 scelionid and 7 tachinid species are listed as the parasitoids of sunn pest in Iran. Key words: Eurygaster integriceps, Scutelleridae, Parasitoid, Scelionidae, Tachinidae, Iran. Introduction The areas cultivated with wheat and barley in Iran are 6.5 million ha and 2.5 million ha, respectively. Production for irrigated wheat is around 2,900 kg per hectare, while rain- fed wheat production averages 800 kg per hectare. Irrigated and rain-fed barley yield approximately the same as irrigated and rain-fed wheat. The major hemipteran pests are Eurygaster integriceps PUTON, Aelia furcula FIEBER and Dolycoris penicillatus HORVATH. At present, E. integriceps, the most destructive species is found wherever wheat is grown. The main infestation areas are in the provinces of Tehran, Markazi, Isfahan, Fars, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Kordestan, Lorestan, Zanjan, Ilam and Khora- san. Sunn pest is absent from narrow strips along the Oman Sea, the Arabian Gulf and the Caspian Sea. E. integriceps currently infests about 1 million ha of wheat and barley. The average yield losses are estimated at 20 to 30 percent if the insects are not control- led. -
Factors Influencing Bug Diversity
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bern Open Repository and Information System (BORIS) Biodiversity and Conservation (2006) 15:275–294 Ó Springer 2006 DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-8231-7 -1 Factors influencing bug diversity (Insecta: Heteroptera) in semi-natural habitats CORINNE ZURBRU¨ GG1 and THOMAS FRANK1,2,* 1Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland; 2Present address: Institute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstrasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; *Author for corre- spondence (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +43-1-47654-3201; fax: +43-1-47654-3203) Received 9 July 2004; accepted in revised form 7 December 2004 Key words: Agroecosystems, Bug community, Canonical correspondence analysis, Ecological compensation areas, Flower abundance, Functional groups, Insect diversity, Species richness, Vegetation structure Abstract. We investigated the abundance and species richness of heteropteran bugs and explored environmental factors which influence bug diversity in three types of semi-natural habitats (wild- flower areas, extensively used meadows, extensively grazed pastures). To cover this topic, it is essential to know how much the relatively young wildflower areas contribute to biodiversity compared with well-established extensive meadows and pastures. Total bug species richness and phytophagous bug species richness were significantly higher in wildflower areas and meadows than in pastures. In wildflower areas, we found the highest number of zoophagous bug species and species overwintering in the egg-stage. Species overwintering as adults were most abundant in meadows. Total number of bug species as well as species richness in either trophic groups and overwintering strategies were significantly positively correlated with vegetation structure. -
Studies of Organismical Biodiversity
Part II Studies of organismical biodiversity 64 3 Animal diversity and ecology of wood decay fungi Contents 3.1 Methods of sampling arthropods in the canopy of the Leipzig floodplain forest 66 3.2 Arboricolous spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Leipzig floodplain forest – first results . 72 3.3 Species diversity and tree association of Heteroptera (Insecta) in the canopy of a Quercus-Fraxinus-Tilia floodplain forest . 81 3.4 Spatial distribution of Neuropterida in the LAK stand: significance of host tree specificity . 91 3.5 Ecological examinations concerning xylobiontic Coleoptera in the canopy of a Quercus-Fraxinus forest . 97 3.6 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the forest canopy: species com- position, seasonality, and year-to-year fluctuation . 106 3.7 Diversity and spatio-temporal activity pattern of nocturnal macro-Lepidoptera in a mixed deciduous forest near Leipzig . 111 3.8 Arthropod communities of various deciduous trees in the canopy of the Leipzig riparian forest with special reference to phytophagous Coleoptera . 127 3.9 Vertical stratification of bat activity in a deciduous forest . 141 3.10 Influence of small scale conditions on the diversity of wood decay fungi in a temperate, mixed deciduous forest canopy . 150 65 Sampling design for arthropod studies 3.1 Methods of sampling arthropods in the canopy of the Leipzig floodplain forest Erik Arndt1, Martin Unterseher & Peter J. Horchler SHORT COMMUNICATION Window trap (Flight interception traps) Intensive entomological investigations have been car- Composite flight-interception traps (Basset et al. ried out at the Leipzig crane site in the years 2001 1997, Schubert 1998) were used to catch flying in- to 2003, to evaluate the diversity and distribution of sects (e.g.