DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Program.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Program.Indd Complete Streets Survey & Planning Program Clinton, Massachusetts DRAFT DRAFT Prepared By: Prepared for: Town of Clinton Community and Part 1 of 2 Economic Development Offi ce March 5, 2013 Clinton Complete Streets Survey Project Purpose: TABLE OF CONTENTS To idenƟ fy mobility needs and desires of inhabitants of the Project Area: to evaluate exisƟ ng public way 1. Overview and Goals condiƟ ons, with special aƩ enƟ on given to ‘Complete Streets’ factors; to map and otherwise document the 1.1 Project Area results of these Community Need and ExisƟ ng CondiƟ ons Studies, and, to compile the data generated into a 1.2 Addi onal Area of Study scoring matrix for use by the Municipality as it plans for implementaƟ on of improvements to public ways. 1.3 Project Quadrants 2. Documenta on of Exis ng Condi ons in the Public Right of Way Primary Project Objective: 2.1 Right of Way Width To integrate Complete Streets pracƟ ces into local roadway improvement project prioriƟ zaƟ on within Low to 2.2 Pavement Width Moderate Income Neighborhoods. 2.3 Bridges, Underpasses, Rail Road Crossings & Culverts 2.4 Sidewalks What are Complete Streets? 2.5 Accessible Ramps 2.6 Signs Complete Streets are Street corridors designed for all user types from pedestrians to bicyclists to motorists & 2.7 Modes transit riders from the young to the old and from the healthy to the disabled. 2.8 Street Ligh ng 2.9 Street Trees Complete Streets are designed to make it easier to walk, cross streets, walk and bike to des na ons, and u lize 2.10 Other Signifi cant Features transit safely and effi ciently. 3. Mapping 3.1 Project Area Complete Streets are ‘Balanced Streets’ that accommodate various modes of transporta on to the reasonable 3.2 Primary Streets and Gateways extent that all modal considera ons and provisions can be made within the Right of Way. Complete Streets 3.3 Community Des na ons also represent equality in transporta on choices and with less income and age based discrimina on and fewer 3.4 Priority Walk Areas mobility barriers. 3.5 Priority Bike Areas 3.6 Commercial Area walk radius map (.5mile) Who is the Probable User? 3.7 School walk radius map (1.5 mile) 3.8 State Numbered Routes: Arterial Streets To be complete, future roadway improvement plans should strive to establish a balance within the roadway 3.9 Quadrants corridor, and equally importantly, connec vity to other des na ons. Too o en, it has been suggested that a a. Quadrant 1 Descrip on & Map mere lack of pedestrians or bicyclists observed indicates a lack of community interest or need. This approach b. Quadrant 2 Descrip on & Map may be shortsighted, and may not mean there is no demand for these modes of travel: absence of various modes c. Quadrant 3 Descrip on & Map may in fact refl ect percep ons regarding the ease of use, connec vity to des na ons, or safety of the roadway d. Quadrant 4 Descrip on & Map corridor in ques on, which in turn infl uences people’s choice of modes. 4. Repor ng and Rankings 4.1 Methodology Complete Streets Survey and Planning Products 4.2 Summary of highest ranked streets by composite score results The work product developed consists of 3 parts 4.3 Matrices Part 1. This Narra ve Summary Report with street scoring matrices (11x17) a. Quadrant 1 Matrix Part 2. An Asset Inventory Report (8.5x11) b. Quadrant 2 Matrix Part 3. Project Area Mapping (Large format) c. Quadrant 3 Matrix d. Quadrant 4 Matrix Methodology: 4.4 Interpreta on of Rankings and Results 5. Recommenda ons The research, fi eld documenta on, data collec on, site observa on, photography, measuring, and condi ons 5.1 General Recommenda ons assessment for this project occurred from May 2014 - October 2015. All roadway surface ra ng values set during 5.2 Specifi c Recommenda ons the period of inventory should be accepted only as a snapshot’ in me of the roadways condi on. All streets 5.3 Graphics have likely con nued to depreciate in quality (see deduct values) since their ini al date of recording. Ini al work 6. References involved researching US Census data, Complete Street design objec ves, Mass DOT records and mapping. The 7. Acknowledgements project scope did not include traffi c volume counts or traffi c studies. Complete Streets Survey & Planning Program - Clinton, Massachusetts Clinton Complete Streets 1. Over view and Goals: 1.1 The Project Area The Project Area was established by the Town as CDBG Target areas. Block 7162001 En rely Subset of 7162002 (4 Parcels targeted) Block 7163003 En rely Block 7161002 (Par al) Block 7161003 En rely The area was es mated to contain 20 miles of roadway. 1.2 Additional Area of Study The Project Area for the purposes of the study was expanded to the west to allow a more complete inventory and assessment of the streets and sidewalks linking the fi rst study blocks iden fi ed above. A por on of Block 7162002 was included, to allow the review of streets linkages and between Block 7162001 and Block 7161003as well as to explore connec vity to the hospital. This adjustment added approximately 5 miles of roadway to the Project Area. 1.3 Study Target While considered Town-wide study, The Project Area has been inten onally focused to include LMI Census Blocks. LMI (Low-Moderate Income) popula ons is defi ned an Income equal to or less than the Sec on 8 Low Income limit as established by HUD. In 2014, this income was ______XXXXXX. In Clinton, 7.1% of the popula on lives below the Poverty Line, of that demographic 13.9% are residents that are 65 years of age or older. 88.2% of the Popula on is White, XYZ. Complete Streets Survey & Planning Program - Clinton, Massachusetts 1.4 Project Quadrants Early in the course of study, it was observed that the elevated Rail Road corridors and overpasses have created dis nc ve quadrants in Clinton. In large part, the rail beds, constructed on fi ll, create earthen walls or dikes that compartmentalize the town into four primary quadrants. Each quadrant is connected to each other with either a minimum of two or a maximum of three street connec ons. These streets have dis nct ‘gateways’ or portals into the various quadrants, which consist of one at-grade crossings, one bridge and fi ve bridge-underpasses thru which all modes (other than freight rail) must pass. The overall complexion of connec vity or street completeness Map of Rail Road in the Town is to some degree constrained by the existence of the elevated rail lines: Due to the long linear rail interface with project line embankments, there are rela vely few streets that make cross-town connec ons, thus forcing more vehicular quadrants and pedestrian volume on the six streets that do connect under or over the rail lines. The rail lines, like limited access highways in other communi es, limit the opportunity to provide alternate routes and relieve conges on. In the case of Clinton, Industrializa on has led to a pa ern of development of large mill complexes, o en built parallel to the tracks, thus further restric ng opportuni es for inter connec vity within the fabric of the town streets. Bridges, Underpasses and Crossings 1. High Street 5. Greeley Street 2. Water Street 6. New Harbor Road (Bridge) 3. Main Street 7. Sterling Street (at grade) 4. Brook Street 4 1 5 7 2 3 1. High Street RR Underpass 2. Water Street RR Underpass 6 3. Main Street RR Underpass 4. Brook Street RR Underpass Complete Streets Survey & Planning Program - Clinton, Massachusetts 2.5 Accessible Ramps 2. Documentation of existing conditions in the Public Right of Way Associated with the 14.5 mile of sidewalks there are 237 Accessible Ramps within the Study Area. Accessible 2.1 Right of Way Width Ramps aff ord the non-able-bodied pedestrian or those using wheelchairs a smooth and gradual transi on from the roadway surface (most commonly from crosswalks) up to the sidewalk surface which is typically elevated The Public Right of Ways were catalogued using GIS data base informa on, Town Maps and State ROW maps. above the road surface. Most of the accessible ramps inventoried are of adequate width, and very few were The Right of Way corridors within the project area were overlaid and cross referenced with the street widths found to have obstruc ons (U lity poles, hydrants, signs, etc.) restric ng the accessible route. Most of the ramps and sidewalk data collected in the fi eld. The width of the right of way is to some degree a measure of the overall inventoried do require upgrades and re-work to come into full compliance with ADA standards. capacity of any Street(Motorized Vehicles –cars, trucks, busses, freight trucking) parked vehicles, Bikes and It can be assumed that for the 40% of the project area streets which currently have no sidewalks at all, and as Pedestrians. Thus the true level of any Street’s Completeness poten al is in many ways linked to the Right of Way such there would be few or no ADA accessible routes or crossings. “poten al” or available with in which to balance the various modes of transporta on, ie, narrow ROW corridors have more limita ons than wider ones. Occasionally the width of the Right of Way will change along a given 2.6 Signs street, o en if the historic ownership changed (Town to State) a situa on that some mes compromising the desired street design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complete Streets Evaluation 2016 Planning Partners Conference
    December 02, 2016 Complete Streets Evaluation 2016 Planning Partners Conference Topics Covered in this Presentation • What is a Complete Street? • Benefits and Challenges of Complete Streets • What is MMLOS? • Importance of Multimodal Evaluations • Methods of Evaluating MMLOS • Making Connections in Adams County What is a Complete Street? Complete Streets are streets for everyone. They are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities. Complete Streets make it easy to cross the street, walk to shops, and bicycle to work. They allow buses to run on time and make it safe for people to walk to and from train stations. -National Complete Streets Coalition What is a Complete Street? • Maximized auto capacity • Limited left-turn access • Limited pedestrian space • Long crossing distances for pedestrians • No clear cycling space Charlie Gandy – Livable Communities Inc. What is a Complete Street? • Reduced auto capacity • Dedicated cycling space • Increased left-turn access • Limited pedestrian space • Long crossing distances for pedestrians Charlie Gandy – Livable Communities Inc. What is a Complete Street? • Reduced auto capacity • Dedicated cycling space • Increased left-turn access • Limited pedestrian space • Increased treatments for safe pedestrian crossings Charlie Gandy – Livable Communities Inc. Benefits of Complete Streets Economic Roadway safety Shifting preferences for development urban environments Economic Benefits of Complete Streets Property Values: • Properties values along the Indianapolis Cultural Trail increased 148% after construction Indiana University Public Policy Institute Indianapolis Cultural Trail Economic Benefits of Complete Streets Property Values: • A one-point increase in WalkScore.com rating is associated with a $700 to $3,000 increase in property values Smart Growth America Economic Benefits of Complete Streets Retail Sales: • A study based on 78 businesses in Portland found that non-drivers spend similar amounts or more than drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
    COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets during the planning and/or design of projects affecting the public right-of-way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11-901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review or Plan of Development Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review. The Handbook can be accessed at http://philadelphiastreets.com/complete-streets.aspx. 1 COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED TO NOTE: § This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically. Text fields will expand automatically as you type. § This checklist is estimated to take 60–90 minutes to complete for applicants familiar with the Handbook. § Answering “No” or “Not Applicable” (N/A) to questions in this checklist does not result in an automatic denial of approval. Applicants shall provide adequate explanation and comments to justify any such responses in the space provided at the end the checklist.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets Policy
    Proposed City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy 1 City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Vision: The Complete Streets Vision is to develop a safe, efficient, and reliable travel network of streets, sidewalks, and urban trails throughout the City of Grand Junction (City) to equitably serve ALL users and ALL modes of transportation. Complete Streets will provide residents improved access, safety, health and environment—helping Grand Junction to become the most livable community west of the Rockies. The Comprehensive Plan established specific strategies to implement its vision, guiding principles, goals and policies. In Chapter 5, Balanced Transportation, there are strategies to provide alternatives to getting around the community, increasing connectivity between neighborhoods, schools, parks, shopping and employment areas. It is through the buildout of neighborhood and village centers, along with strategies identified in the Comprehensive Plan and this Circulation Plan that will help the community achieve its vision of becoming the most livable City west of the Rockies. Grand Junction streets will be designed and maintained to be safe, attractive, accessible, convenient and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities and transportation modes. Complete Streets will make the City of Grand Junction more walkable and bikeable, support transit, foster community engagement, and support the local economy and property values. Complete Streets will strengthen quality of life by improving public health and safety, advancing mobility, enhancing livability and long- term sustainability to achieve the vision “to become the most livable community west of the Rockies.” Purpose: The City of Grand Junction commits to improvements that are planned, designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to support safe, efficient and convenient mobility for all roadway users—pedestrians, bicyclists, people who use mobility devices, transit riders, freight traffic, emergency response vehicles, and motorists—regardless of age or ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets
    REGIONAL WORKBOOK FOR COMPLETE STREETS A SUPPLEMENT TO WALK.BIKE.THRIVE! TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................... 3 Section 1. Understanding Complete Streets ............................ 4 What are Streets? What are Complete Streets? Credits What do Complete Streets do? “How are we to tame this force unless we understand it Why are Complete Streets Important on Major Roads? and even develop a kind of love for it?” - J.B. Jackson Why are Complete Streets Regionally Important? This document is a supplement to the Atlanta Regional Commission’s Walk. Bike. Thrive! plan and Section 2. Making Decisions About Complete Streets ............. 10 is written to support and should be considered part How Can Data and Policy Inform Complete Streets? of The Atlanta Region’s Plan. This document does not What is The Regional Strategy for Complete Streets? constitute a standard specification or regulation. What are the Components of a Complete Street? More broadly, this document draws from many sources of inspiration that transportation policies Do Complete Streets All Look Alike? better achieve community purposes when they Section 3. Critical Questions About Walking & Bicycling on balance aesthetic, ecological, communal, and civic interests. Not everybody likes the smell of gasoline. Suburban Roads ................................................................ 22 Critical Questions About Walking and Biking on Suburban Roads The Atlanta Regional Commission and project staff would like to thank the elected officials, How to Make 4- and 5-lane Suburban Roads More Complete? professional staffs, and citizens of the region who Bikes on Suburban Arterials: On-street or Off-street? supported or laid the foundation for this work. Where Do We Put a Crosswalk? ADOPTED NOVEMBER 2019 How do Complete Streets Support Regional Transit? Design & Planning Resources .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1-19-16 Council Agenda Report
    City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date: January 19, 2016 ClrYD,CH,CO TO: City Council FROM: Public Work Director - Engineering, Brendan Ottoboni, 879-6901 RE. ESPLANADE CORRIDOR SAFETY AND ACCESSABILITY STUDY UPDATE REPORT IN BRIEF: The City is currently engaged in a transportation safety and accessibility study of the Esplanade corridor between Memorial Wayand 11th Avenue, including a segment of the parallel facility, Oleander Avenue. Theoverall goal of this study is to improve the safety and accessibility of the Esplanade for all modes of transportation while maintaining the tree-lined "Boulevard" design so iconic to Chico. Following is an update to the Council on the status of the study, review of the results of the public outreach effort, and preview of the preferred design recommendations. The Esplanade Corridor Study team, including Public Works staff and the City's consulting traffic engineer. Steve Weinberger of W-Trans, continues to seek community participation in the development of the Study and, over the course of the next month, will be finalizing the preferred design concepts developed through the analysis of corridor operations and community input. The team will present a recommended package of improvements at the forthcoming third and final Esplanade Corridor Improvement Study Public Workshop scheduled for March gth, 2016. Following the workshop, W-Trans will prepare the Draft Esplanade Corridor Safety and Accessibility Study which will include traffic data and analysis, results of the public outreach effort, and the preferred design recommendations for Council consideration. With City Council approval, the resultant study will serve as a guiding document for future grant applications to fund recommended improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Ave Esplanade Ave
    New Orleans Complete Streets Experience CITY OF NEW ORLEANS Louis Haywood Department of Public Works January 19, 2016 Complete Streets policies Ensure that the entire right-of-way is planned, designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to provide safe access for all users Credit: National Complete Streets Coalition New Orleans CS Program • “…by requiring that all planning, designing, funding, operation and maintenance of the city's transportation system to accommodate and encourage travel for all users in a balanced, responsible and equitable manner consistent with, and supportive of, the surrounding community.” Credit: National Complete Streets Coalition Complete Streets User Groups Bicyclists • All Ages Transit ALL Motorists • Stops • Safety • Crossings USERS • Clarity Pedestrians • Old • Young • Disabled Complete Streets: Is a high-level policy direction Changes the everyday decision-making processes and systems Represents an incremental approach Has long-term results Credit: National Complete Streets Coalition Complete Streets is not: • A one-off “special” street project • A design prescription • A mandate for immediate retrofit • A silver bullet; other issues must be addressed: – Land use (proximity, mixed-use) – Environmental concerns – Transportation Demand Management Credit: National Complete Streets Coalition Standard New Orleans Residential Street Complete? YES! Streetscapes and Sidewalks Oak Street Reconstruction Oak Street Reconstruction Bike Racks Street Trees Concrete Crosswalks Curb Extensions w/ Brick Accents! Decorative
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets Resources Handbook
    LOCAL PLANNING COMPLETE STREETS RESOURCES HANDBOOK Complete Streets are designed and operated with safety and efficiency in mind. Communities direct their transportation planners and engineers to improve the overall transportation network and ensure safe access for all modes and users. Not all Complete Streets look the same – each one is unique to its community and context. Complete Streets may include improvements such as sidewalks, bike lanes, bus lanes, safe crossings, pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, or roundabouts. Complete Streets refers to an approach to transportation planning, design, construction, and operations and maintenance that considers the needs of all users – motorists, pedestrians, transit vehicles and users, bicyclists, commercial freight trucks, and emergency vehicles. All users should be accommodated regardless of age, ability, or mode of transportation. The goal of complete streets is to: • Develop a balanced transportation system that integrates all transportation modes • Include transportation users of all types, ages, and abilities. Complete Streets does not mean “all modes on all roads.” Instead, implementing Complete Streets principles ensures that the accessibility and safety of all travelers be appropriately considered and incorporated throughout any road project’s planning, design, and construction, depending on the local context and needs, which may vary in urban, suburban, and rural settings. To connect people to destinations throughout the region and beyond, local governments should provide a system of interconnected arterial roads, streets, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities to serve short and medium-length trips. Complete Streets can be achieved by changing policy to include the needs of pedestrians, transit riders, and bicyclists to make walking, bicycling, and riding transit safer and easier.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Billings Complete Streets Progress Report 2017
    City of Billings Complete Streets Progress Report 2017 1 | P a g e Project Credits Wyeth Friday, City of Billings/Yellowstone County Planning Department Scott Walker, City of Billings/Yellowstone County Planning Department Lora Mattox, City of Billings/Yellowstone County Planning Department Elyse Monat, City of Billings/Yellowstone County Planning Department Terry Smith, City of Billings Public Works Engineering Division Erin Claunch, City of Billings Public Works Engineering Division Aaron Lebsack, City of Billings Public Works Engineering Division Debra Hagel, City of Billings MET Transit Rusty Logan, City of Billings MET Transit Gary Neville, Montana Department of Transportation Melissa Henderson, RiverStone Health Kathy Aragon, Citizen Steve Woodard, Living Independently for Today & Tomorrow (LIFTT) A Special Thank You to the Billings City Council and the Healthy By Design Coalition for their continued support. Complete Street Elements being constructed as part of the Grand Avenue and 56th Street West reconstruction project as part of the new Ben Steele Elementary School 2 | P a g e Foreword – Letter from Coalition and Mayor 3 | P a g e Table of Contents Project Credits ............................................................................................... 2 Foreword ........................................................................................................ 3 Table of Contents ........................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets/Living Street: a Design Manual for Cape
    Complete Streets/Living Streets A Design Manual for Cape Cod October 2012 Cape Cod Commission Complete Streets/Living Streets A Design Manual for Cape Cod October 2012 Prepared by: Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street, PO Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 A Department of Barnstable County Regional Government, Massachusetts Acknowledgments Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Staff : Sarah Korjeff , Preservation Specialist. Project Manager Philip Dascombe, AICP, Senior Community Design Planner Tabitha Harkin, Landscape Design Specialist Steven Tupper, Technical Services Planner AICP: American Institute of Certifi ed Planners Table of Contents Introduction 1 I. Cape Cod Character and Context Sensitive Design II. Complete Streets/Living Streets and their Benefi ts III. Principles for Designing Complete Streets/Living Streets IV. Typical Cape Cod Street Types V. Special Issues to Consider for Cape Cod Roadways Toolkit 11 I. Suggestions for Road Segments/Traveled Ways II. Suggestions for Intersections III. Suggestions for Pedestrian Accommodations IV. Suggestions for Bicycle Accommodations V. Suggestions for Transit VI. Suggestions for Land Use/Streetscape Ecosystem Case Studies 35 I. Main Streets/Village Center Streets II. Highway Commercial Areas III. Regional and Scenic Roadways Next Steps 41 I. Implementing Complete Streets/Living Streets II. Measures of Success III. On-Line Resources omplete Streets and Living Streets are streets that address the mobility needs of all users – pe- Cdestrians, cyclists, drivers and transit riders – making streets safer, sustainable, and more acces- Introduction sible to a wide variety of people. This guidebook aims to explain and illustrate the concepts of Com- plete Streets and Living Streets, and to encourage people to consider these design options when planning roadway improvement projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets Policy
    RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY WHEREAS, the mobility of freight and passengers and the safety, convenience, and comfort of motorists, cyclists, pedestrians - including people requiring mobility aids, transit riders, and neighborhood residents of all ages and abilities should all be considered when planning and designing Rochester’s streets; and, WHEREAS, integrating sidewalks, bike facilities, transit amenities, and safe crossings into the initial design of street projects avoids the expense of retrofits later; and, WHEREAS, streets are a critical component of public space and play a major role in establishing the image and identity of a city, providing a key framework for current and future development; and, WHEREAS, streets are a critical component of the success and vitality of adjoining private uses and neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, Active Living integrates physical activity into daily routines and Active Living communities encourage individuals of all ages and abilities to be more physically active; and, WHEREAS, Active Living improves health by lowering risk for poor health conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease; and, WHEREAS, communities that support Active Living strive to create amenities that will enhance the quality of life of its residents, improve the physical and social environment in ways that attract businesses and workers, and contribute to economic development; and, WHEREAS, a Complete Streets policy supports implementation of the City Council’s Resolution Affirming Activity-Friendly
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets
    Complete Streets After an era during which transportation investments often overpowered urban areas, there is movement to rebalance community and mobility needs. Complete Streets is a part of that rebalancing. For the Strip District, Complete Streets is important when the street network is taken as a whole. Features of Complete Streets The concept of Complete Streets strongly emerged over the last decade, and the National Complete Streets Coalition was created to advance the concept. The Coalition defines Complete Streets’ benefits as those that “are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of National Complete Street Coalition Logo illustrates mode choice all ages and abilities must be able to safely move along and across a complete street. Complete Streets make it easy to cross the street, walk to shops, and bicycle to work. They allow buses to run on time and make it safe for people to walk to and from train stations.” Benefits of Complete Streets The features of Complete Streets results in multiple benefits for the Strip District: Multi-modal choices are offered to give businesses, visitors, residents and visitors. Allowing for mobility on a future, coordinated street network actually helps support the current network and accommodate more travel options. The solutions are context sensitive, which is extremely important because of its historical qualities. This means the very tightly formed District has more flexibility as it continues to transform over time. Complete Streets can yield and support livable communities. Certainly the energy and vitality of the Strip are renowned – and it is a livable place.
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur Street
    PROJECT SUMMARY: Decatur Street The City of New Orleans is moving forward on safety and complete streets improvements along Decatur Street between Esplanade Avenue and Dumaine Street. Funding for this project is available from the 2016 bond program as part of the Moving New Orleans initiative. The Decatur Street project is approximately 5 blocks long and is an upriver-downriver neighborhood street connecting the Marigny and the French Quarter. The land uses along Decatur Street are primarily ground level commercial retail with upper floor residential. Decatur Street is also a route for the No. 5 Marigny-Bywater and No. 55 Elysian Fields buses. Decatur Street Traffic Safety Snapshot (2014 – 2018) A total of 173 crashes were recorded on Decatur Street over the five-year period (2014-2018), resulting in one fatality and the injury of 57 people. Most crashes occurred at Barracks Street (37) followed by St. Philip Street (33) and Ursulines Avenue (29). There were nine crashes involving pedestrians, including one fatality and 17 crashes involving bicyclists. Proposed Improvements This project seeks to balance the needs of all roadway users, consistent with the City’s Complete Streets Policy. Improvements include adding a bike lane, installing marked crosswalks, and improving intersection geometry and sight distances. Between Esplanade Avenue and Dumaine Street, the roadway will be reconfigured as a bike lane, one general traffic lane and a parking lane. The proposed improvements are designed to improve overall safety, connect to existing bikeways, and make Decatur Street a more comfortable place to walk, bike, drive and use transit. This document and the information contained herein is prepared solely for the purpose of identifying, evaluating and planning safety improvements on public roads which may be implemented utilizing federal aid highway funds; and is therefore exempt from discovery or admission into evidence pursuant to 23 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]