Psychometrics a RTICLE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Psychometrics a RTICLE O RIGINAL Psychometrics A RTICLE PSICOMETRIA PSICOMETRÍA Luiz Pasquali1 ABSTRACT RESUMO RESUMEN Psychometrics has foundations on the A psicometria fundamenta-se na teoria da La Psicometría se fundamenta en la teoría theory of measurement in Sciences and is medida em ciências para explicar o sentido de la medida en las ciencias buscando ex- aimed at explaining the meaning of re- que têm as respostas dadas pelos sujeitos plicar el sentido en las respuestas de los que sponses provided by subjects submitted to a uma série de tarefas e propor técnicas fueron sujetos a una serie de tareas, ade- a series of tasks, and proposing techniques de medida dos processos mentais. Neste ar- más de proponerse técnicas de medida de for the measurement of mental processes. tigo são apresentados os conceitos e mo- sus procesos mentales. En este artículo son This article presents concepts and models delos da psicometria moderna e discutidos presentados los conceptos y modelos de of modern psychometrics and discusses the os parâmetros de validade e precisão dos psicometría moderna, así como son discu- validity and reliability parameters of the testes. tidos los parámetros de validez y precisión applied tests. de los testes. KEY WORDS DESCRITORES DESCRIPTORES Psychometrics. Psicometria. Psicometría. Reproducibility of results. Reprodutibilidade dos testes. Reproducibilidad de resultados. Validity of tests. Validade dos testes. Validez de las pruebas. Validation studies. Estudos de validação. Estudios de validación. 1 Researcher Professor Associated with the University of Brasilia. Brasilia, DF, Brazil. [email protected] Rev Esc Enferm USP Received: 15/06/2008 PortuguesePsychometrics / English: 2009; 43(Spe):992-9 Approved: 15/12/2008 www.scielo.br/reeuspPasquali L 992 www.ee.usp.br/reeusp/ INTRODUCTION PSYCHOMETRICS: CONCEPT AND MODELS Measurement in psychosocial sciences Modern psychometrics can be traced back to two Psychometrics is etymologically represented as the sources: the classical test theory (CTT), and the item re- theory and technique of measuring mental processes, and sponse theory (IRT). CTT has been axiomatized by is especially applied in the fields of psychology and educa- Gulliksen(3) and IRT was initially elaborated by Lord(4) and tion. It is grounded in the general theory of measurement Rasch(5), and finally axiomatized by Bimbaum(6) and Lord(7). in sciences, or else, in the quantitative method whose ma- jor characteristic is the fact that it represents the knowl- In a general sense, psychometrics attempts to explain edge of nature in a more precise way in comparison with the meaning of responses given by subjects in a series of the application of common language to describe the ob- tasks typically named as items. The CTT is aimed at explain- servation of natural phenomena. ing the total final result, that is, the sum of responses pro- vided to a series of items, expressed by the so-called total Psychometrics historically stems from the psychophys- score (S). For instance, the S in a test of 30 capability items ics of the Germans Ernst Heinrich Weber and Gustav would be the sum of correctly responded items. If the value Fechner. The British Francis Galton also contributed to the of 1 were given to each correct item and 0 to each incor- development of psychometrics by creating tests to mea- rect one, and the subject reached 20 correctly and 10 in- sure mental processes; by the way, he is considered as the correctly responded items, this person’s score S would be creator of psychometrics. However, it was the inventor of 20. The CTT, then, asks itself: what does this total 20 mean the multiple factorial analyses, Leon Louis Thurstone, who to the subject? The IRT, on the other hand, is not inter- enlivened psychometrics, making it different from psy- ested in the test total score; it is specifically aimed at each chophysics. Psychophysics was defined as one of the 30 items and wants to know what the probabil- the measurement of directly observed pro- ity is and what the factors that influence this cesses, or in other words, the organism’s probability are regarding every individual Psychometrics item’s correctness and incorrectness (in ca- stimulus and response, while psychometrics attempts to explain consists in measuring the organism’s behav- pability tests) or acceptance or rejection (in ior by means of mental processes (law of com- the meaning of preference tests: personality, interests, atti- parative judgment). responses given tudes). In such a way, the CTT is interested in by subjects in producing quality tests, while the IRT is fo- Measurement in sciences has raised dia- a series of tasks cused on developing quality tasks (items). At the end, therefore, we have either valid tests tribes among researchers, particularly in the typically named field of social sciences. Nonetheless, the most (CTT) or valid items (IRT), and those results as items. accepted definition among researchers was will build as many valid tests as desired, or given by Stanley Smith Stevens in 1946. He the amount of tests allowed by the items. used to say that to measure meant to assign numbers to Thus, the richness of the psychological or edu- objects and events in accordance with given rules(1). The cational assessment within the IRT’s scope of action con- assignment rules to such numbers are defined by the pro- sists in building store rooms of valid items that evaluate posal of the same author concerning the four measurement latent traits - these store rooms are called item bank, aimed levels or measurement typologies, which are: nominal, or- at elaborating countless numbers of tests. dinal, interval, and ratio. The CTT model was elaborated by Spearman and de- tailed by Gulliksen, as follows: The nominal measurement is the one that applies num- bers to nature phenomena, keeping exclusively the axioms T = TS + E of number identity, that is, the number is employed only as a numeric or graphic symbol. When applying the num- where, ber, the ordinal typology saves the axioms of order, that is T = subject’s total or empirical score, which is the sum to say, the major characteristics of the number, or its mag- of all items achieved by the test; nitude (by definition, a given number is greater or smaller than, not only different from or better than the other ex- TS = true score, which is the real magnitude of what the actly because its value is intrinsically higher or lower than test wants to measure in the subject; that score will be the any other). The other typologies point to axioms of addi- S itself, in case there is no measurement error; tionality. The axiom history was detailed by Whitehead and E = the error of the measurement. Russell between 1910 and 1913, and again in 1965, in their book Principia Mathematica, where they describe the 27 In this way, the empirical score is the sum of the true famous axioms of the mathematical number(2). score and the error; consequently, E = T – TS, and TS = T – E. Psychometrics Rev Esc Enferm USP Pasquali L 2009; 43(Spe):992-9 www.ee.usp.br/reeusp/ 993 Figure 1 shows the relationship among these various elements of the empirical score, where the union between 1,00 the true (TS) and the error (ES) score can be observed; that 0,90 is to say, the subject’s empirical or gross score (T – test re- 0,80 sult known as the Tau score - τ) is comprised of two compo- 0,70 nents: the subject’s real or true score (TS) in what the test 0,60 intends to measure, and the error score (ES) of the mea- P q 0,50 i surement, which is always present in any empirical opera- 0,40 tion. In other words, we are assuming here that as the 0,30 subject’s gross score differs from his true score, it is the 0,20 error that accounts for such a disparity; this difference, then, 0,10 is the error’s concept itself. 0 12345678 TS Capability q Figure 2 - The item’s characteristic curve The IRT is concretely affirming the following: the sub- ject is given a stimulus or a series of stimuli (such as, items of a test) and he/she responds to it/them. From the re- sponses provided by the subject, that is, taking into account the analysis of his/her responses to the specified items, we T ES can deduce on the subject’s latent trait, hypothesizing re- lationships between the subject’s observed responses and the level of his/her latent trait. These relationships can be expressed by means of a mathematical equation that de- scribes the type of function taken on by these relationships. In fact, only a limited number of mathematical models are able to express such relationships, depending on the type of applied mathematical function and/or the number Figure 1 - The true score (TS) components of parameters that one wants to find out for the item. A remarkable advantage IRT has over the classical theory con- cerning the models it uses is that the models employed by Hence, the CTT’s ultimate challenge is to elaborate strat- the IRT allow for disconfirmation. In effect, the demonstra- egies (statistical ones) to either control or evaluate E’s mag- tion of compatibility between the model and the data nitude. Errors are provoked by a wide range of alien factors (model-data goodness-of-fit) is a necessary step towards identified by Campbell and Stanley(8), such as the test’s own this theory’s procedures. Specialized statistical packages are deficiencies, stereotypes and biases of the subject, historical made necessary in order to perform the IRT, as they are factors, and random historical and environmental factors.
Recommended publications
  • Personality Theory and the Nature of Human Nature Robert Hogan
    Personality Theory and The Nature of Human Nature Robert Hogan & Ryne A. Sherman Hogan Assessment Systems Pre-print under review for special issue at Personality and Individual Differences Abstract This overview of modern personality theory makes six points. First, personality theory is crucial for understanding life. Second, life is largely about competition. Third, there is competition within groups for individual status, and there is competition between groups for collective survival. Fourth, academic psychology focuses on within group competition, but between group competition can be more consequential. Fifth, successful within group competition depends on social skill; successful between group competition depends on leadership. And finally, personality determines/explains the outcome of both forms of competition. Personality Theory and The Nature of Human Nature People are the deadliest invasive species in the history of the earth. People have the potential to kill every living thing and, in certain instances have already done so (e.g., passenger pigeons, western black rhinoceros, great auk) or are on their way to doing so (e.g., sea turtles, elephants, tigers, polar bears). Given their frightful potential and world-wide presence, it would be useful to know something about people. Personality psychology is the “go-to” discipline for understanding people; personality psychology is the only discipline whose primary focus is the nature of human nature. What does personality psychology tell us about human nature? The answer depends on whom you ask; or more precisely, to which theory of personality you subscribe. Modern personality psychology began in Vienna at the end of the 19th century, where an amazing flowering of human creativity brought revolutions in a wide variety of fields including architecture, music, physics, medicine, music, painting, literature, economics, and especially philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20Th Century
    Review of General Psychology Copyright 2002 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 2002, Vol. 6, No. 2, 139–152 1089-2680/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.139 The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century Steven J. Haggbloom Renee Warnick, Jason E. Warnick, Western Kentucky University Vinessa K. Jones, Gary L. Yarbrough, Tenea M. Russell, Chris M. Borecky, Reagan McGahhey, John L. Powell III, Jamie Beavers, and Emmanuelle Monte Arkansas State University A rank-ordered list was constructed that reports the first 99 of the 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Eminence was measured by scores on 3 quantitative variables and 3 qualitative variables. The quantitative variables were journal citation frequency, introductory psychology textbook citation frequency, and survey response frequency. The qualitative variables were National Academy of Sciences membership, election as American Psychological Association (APA) president or receipt of the APA Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, and surname used as an eponym. The qualitative variables were quantified and combined with the other 3 quantitative variables to produce a composite score that was then used to construct a rank-ordered list of the most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. The discipline of psychology underwent a eve of the 21st century, the APA Monitor (“A remarkable transformation during the 20th cen- Century of Psychology,” 1999) published brief tury, a transformation that included a shift away biographical sketches of some of the more em- from the European-influenced philosophical inent contributors to that transformation. Mile- psychology of the late 19th century to the stones such as a new year, a new decade, or, in empirical, research-based, American-dominated this case, a new century seem inevitably to psychology of today (Simonton, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Psychology
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY PSYCH 126 Acknowledgements College of the Canyons would like to extend appreciation to the following people and organizations for allowing this textbook to be created: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Chancellor Diane Van Hook Santa Clarita Community College District College of the Canyons Distance Learning Office In providing content for this textbook, the following professionals were invaluable: Mehgan Andrade, who was the major contributor and compiler of this work and Neil Walker, without whose help the book could not have been completed. Special Thank You to Trudi Radtke for editing, formatting, readability, and aesthetics. The contents of this textbook were developed under the Title V grant from the Department of Education (Award #P031S140092). However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Unless otherwise noted, the content in this textbook is licensed under CC BY 4.0 Table of Contents Psychology .................................................................................................................................................... 1 126 ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 - History of Cognitive Psychology ............................................................................................. 7 Definition of Cognitive Psychology
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology CORE Requirements
    Psychology CORE Requirements Freshman Year Sophomore Year Junior Year Senior Year ___ COR 101 ___ COR 201 ___ COR 301 ___ COR 401 or 402 ___ COR 102 ___ COR 202 ___ COR 302 ___ COR 103 or 104 ___ COR 203 ___ FYS 101 or OGL 101 Required Foundation Courses Social Psychology Discipline Area ___ PSY 101 Introduction to Psychology (Select one course) ___ PSY 209 Behavioral Neuroscience ___ PSY 202 Organizational Psychology ___ PSY 204 Social Psychology ___ PSY 320 Psychological Statistics and Research MethodsI ___ PSY 321 Psychological Statistics and Research Methods II ___ PSY 290 Special Topics (With approval from Psych dept.) ___ PSY 322 Advanced Experimental Psychology ___ PSY 490 Advanced Special Topics (With approval from Psych dept.) ___ PSY 405 History and Systems ___ One Semester of Foreign Language at the second semester elementary level or higher Required Elective Completion of any additional Psychology elective excluding the following courses: Clinical Psychology Discipline Area (Select one course) PSY 200 Independent Study in Psychology ___ PSY 205 Theories of Personality PSY 400 Advanced Independent Study in Psychology ___ PSY 206 Abnormal Psychology PSY 406 Directed Research in Psychology ___ PSY 290 Special Topics (With approval from Psych dept.) PSY 407 Internship in Psychology ___ PSY 303 Psychological Testing ___ PSY 490 Advanced Special Topics (With approval from Psych dept.) Recommended Activities Cognitive/Developmental Psychology Meet with your Faculty Academic Advisor before registering for Discipline Area courses
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Psychologist Educational and Work Experience Requirements
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Psychologist Educational and Work Experience Requirements Sec. 20-188-1. Definitions (a) "Accreditation by the American Psychological Association" shall mean that: (1) the program held provisional accreditation status or full accreditation status throughout the period of the applicant's enrollment, provided said provisional status subsequently progressed without interruption to full accreditation; or (2) the program held probationary accreditation status during the applicant's enrollment and, upon termination of said probationary status, subsequently achieved full accreditation. (b) "Recognized regional accrediting body" shall mean one of the following accrediting bodies: New England Association of Schools and Colleges; Middle States Commission on Higher Education; North Central Association of Colleges and Schools; Northwest Association of Colleges and Universities; Southern Association of Colleges and Schools; and Western Association of Schools and Colleges. (c) "Accreditation by a recognized regional accrediting body" shall mean that: (1) the institution held accreditation status or candidacy for accreditation throughout the period of the applicant's enrollment, provided said candidacy status subsequently progressed without interruption to full accreditation; or (2) the institution held accreditation status under probation or show-cause order during the applicant's enrollment and, upon termination of said probation or show-cause order, accreditation status was maintained without interruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Psychology and Philosophy East-West Themes and Beyond
    PALGRAVE STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE EAST-WEST PHILOSOPHY Between Psychology and Philosophy East-West Themes and Beyond Michael Slote Palgrave Studies in Comparative East-West Philosophy Series Editors Chienkuo Mi Philosophy Soochow University Taipei City, Taiwan Michael Slote Philosophy Department University of Miami Coral Gables, FL, USA The purpose of Palgrave Studies in Comparative East-West Philosophy is to generate mutual understanding between Western and Chinese philoso- phers in a world of increased communication. It has now been clear for some time that the philosophers of East and West need to learn from each other and this series seeks to expand on that collaboration, publishing books by philosophers from different parts of the globe, independently and in partnership, on themes of mutual interest and currency. The series also publishs monographs of the Soochow University Lectures and the Nankai Lectures. Both lectures series host world-renowned philosophers offering new and innovative research and thought. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/16356 Michael Slote Between Psychology and Philosophy East-West Themes and Beyond Michael Slote Philosophy Department University of Miami Coral Gables, FL, USA ISSN 2662-2378 ISSN 2662-2386 (electronic) Palgrave Studies in Comparative East-West Philosophy ISBN 978-3-030-22502-5 ISBN 978-3-030-22503-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22503-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Theory: a Different Conceptual Approach
    Journal of Leadership Education DOI:10.12806/V17/I2/T1 APRIL 2018 THEORY Leadership Theory: A Different Conceptual Approach William E. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Fort Hays State University Abstract Creating a logical and consistent picture of the state of leadership theory and research is a difficult task (Hernandez, Eberly, Avolio, & Johnson, 2011). Attempts to describe leadership studies occasionally include words such as “paradox,” “inconsistencies,” “contradictions,” and “messy” (Brungardt, 1996; Klenke, 1993). These adjectives flow from many diverse ways of thinking about leadership (Bass, 2008; Grint, 2000; Northouse, 2015; Ruben, 2012). This paper presents an alternative view of leadership theory providing practitioners, educators, and students with an additional-and perhaps a singular-conceptual framework for their toolbox. It also provides leadership studies students with a unifying perspective of leadership theory without taking anything away from individual theories. Introduction This idea for a thirty-thousand-foot alternative view of leadership theory developed out of the challenges associated with teaching leadership studies concepts in China cross-culturally to Chinese students. The understanding of leadership theory that follows allows the reader to grasp the depth and breadth of discipline content in a way that makes sense from a holistic perspective. The new point of view encourages discussion with the hope for a more efficacious understanding of leadership theory in any part of the world. Prior papers have noted this same need and interest (Harter, 2012; Martin & Allen, 2016; Paxton & Van Stralen, 2016; Perkins, 2009). Moreover, this paper answers the call for a critical perspective that goes well beyond the currently available approach by addressing core assumptions in the field (Tourish, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Psychology Glossary
    Social Psychology Glossary This glossary defines many of the key terms used in class lectures and assigned readings. A Altruism—A motive to increase another's welfare without conscious regard for one's own self-interest. Availability Heuristic—A cognitive rule, or mental shortcut, in which we judge how likely something is by how easy it is to think of cases. Attractiveness—Having qualities that appeal to an audience. An appealing communicator (often someone similar to the audience) is most persuasive on matters of subjective preference. Attribution Theory—A theory about how people explain the causes of behavior—for example, by attributing it either to "internal" dispositions (e.g., enduring traits, motives, values, and attitudes) or to "external" situations. Automatic Processing—"Implicit" thinking that tends to be effortless, habitual, and done without awareness. B Behavioral Confirmation—A type of self-fulfilling prophecy in which people's social expectations lead them to behave in ways that cause others to confirm their expectations. Belief Perseverance—Persistence of a belief even when the original basis for it has been discredited. Bystander Effect—The tendency for people to be less likely to help someone in need when other people are present than when they are the only person there. Also known as bystander inhibition. C Catharsis—Emotional release. The catharsis theory of aggression is that people's aggressive drive is reduced when they "release" aggressive energy, either by acting aggressively or by fantasizing about aggression. Central Route to Persuasion—Occurs when people are convinced on the basis of facts, statistics, logic, and other types of evidence that support a particular position.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Cognitive Psychology (PSYC 230) Fall 2018 General Information
    Introduction to Cognitive Psychology (PSYC 230) Fall 2018 General Information Instructor Dr. Kendra Seaman Contact Info: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 11:00 AM – 12:00PM (and by appointment) | Davie 228 Teaching Assistants Fanting Kung | Contact Info: [email protected] Kayleigh Nemuth | Contact Info: [email protected] Meeting Time: Tuesday/Thursday 9:30 -10:45 AM, Murphey 116 Prerequisites: Psychology 101 Course Overview Course Overview. Cognitive psychology is the study of how we sense and interpret information from the world around us, incorporate this new information with our prior experiences, and determine how to respond to an ever- changing environment. While the main purpose of this course is to introduce you to the scientific study of the mind, you will also begin to understand the central role cognition plays in our everyday lives. The course will proceed in three distinct modules: Attention and Perception, Learning and Memory, and Higher Cognitive Function. Each module will end with a module exam and there will be a cumulative final exam. Written work will include both formal and informal writing assignments. You will also be expected to carry out several demonstration experiments from the on-line MindTap/CogLab library and participate in class polls and discussions. Course Learning Objectives. Upon completing this course, students should be able to: ▪ Analyze, evaluate, and compare major theories in cognitive psychology and relate new experimental results to these theories. ▪ Critically evaluate the quality of cognitive research and formulate logical arguments on the basis of theoretical or empirical analyses. ▪ Understand research methods in cognitive psychology, the strengths and weaknesses of these methods, and how these methods are being integrated with neuroscience to further our understanding of how the mind and brain function.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology and Its History
    2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING PSYCHOLOGY'S HISTORY • Distinguish between primary and secondary sources of historical information and describe the kinds of primary source information typically found by historians in archives • Explain how the process of doing history can produce some degree of confidence that truth has been attained PSYCHOLOGY AND ITS HISTORY One hundred is a nice round number and a one-hundredth anniversary is ample cause for celebration. In recent years, psychologists with a sense of history have celebrated often. The festivities began back in 1979, with the centennial of the founding of Wilhelm Wundt's laboratory at Leipzig, Germany. In 1992, the American Psychological Associ­ ation (APA) created a yearlong series of events to commemorate the centennial of its founding in G. Stanley Hall's study at Clark University on July 8, 1892. During the cen­ tennial year, historical articles appeared in all of the APA's journals and a special issue of American Psychologist focused on history; several books dealing with APA's history were commissioned (e.g., Evans, Sexton, & Cadwallader, 1992); regional conventions had historical themes; and the annual convention in Washington featured events ranging from the usual symposia and invited addresses on history to a fancy dress ball at Union Station featuring period (1892) costumes and a huge APA birthday cake. Interest in psychology's history has not been limited to centennial celebrations, of course. Histories of psychology were written soon after psychology itself appeared on the academic scene (e.g., Baldwin, 1913), and at least two of psychology's most famous books, E. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Personality Traits
    Personality Traits SECOND EDITION GERALD MATTHEWS University of Cincinnati IAN J. DEARY University of Edinburgh MARTHA C. WHITEMAN University of Edinburgh published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011–4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1998. Reprinted 1999, 2000, 2002 Second edition 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typefaces Times 10/13 pt. Formata System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Matthews, Gerald. Personality traits / Gerald Matthews, Ian J. Deary, Martha C. Whiteman. – 2nd edn. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0 521 83107 5 – ISBN 0 521 53824 6 (pb) 1. Personality. I. Deary, Ian J. II. Whiteman, Martha C. III. Title. BF698.M3434 2003 155.23 – dc21 2003046259 ISBN 0 521 83107 5 hardback ISBN 0 521 53824 6 paperback The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Psychology, Psychotherapy Transcript
    Discovering Psychology: Updated Edition: 22 Psychotherapy 1 of 16 Discovering Psychology: Updated Edition 22 Psychotherapy 1 01:28:50:00 >> ZIMBARDO: When mental illness strikes, how should it be treated -- as a biologically based disease that needs medical treatment? 2 01:29:06:13 Or as a psychological disorder that demands changes in thoughts and behavior? 3 01:29:12:29 "Psychotherapy," this time on Discovering Psychology . 4 01:29:47:22 >> ZIMBARDO: When our car breaks down, we take it to a mechanic. 5 01:29:50:21 But what happens when we break down -- when our behavior becomes erratic or self-defeating and our thoughts and emotions become disordered and painful? 6 01:30:00:20 Whom do we turn to then? 7 01:30:03:11 We might talk to a friend or a relative, a teacher, or family physician. 8 01:30:09:11 But if our problems continue to worsen, it's time to seek professional help. 9 01:30:14:24 >> Have you seen your parents recently? 10 01:30:17:07 >> I'm at that age where I'm beyond wanting to see them a great deal of the time. 11 01:30:24:11 >> ZIMBARDO: Professional treatment for mental illness is available from a wide range of health specialists: clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, psychological counselors, and psychiatrically-trained social workers. 12 01:30:39:06 In fact, the vast majority of professionals working in the field of psychology are practicing therapists. 13 01:30:46:10 But mental problems, like physical illnesses, vary greatly in kind and severity.
    [Show full text]