DOCSLIB.ORG

ILGA 2017 State-Sponsored Homophobia Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ILGA 2017 State-Sponsored Homophobia Report STATE-SPONSORED HOMOPHOBIA A WORLD SURVEY OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION LAWS: CRIMINALISATION, PROTECTION AND RECOGNITION 12TH EDITION MAY 2017 AENGUS CARROLL AND LUCAS RAMÓN MENDOS ilga.org This 12th edition of State Sponsored Homophobia report was researched and written by Aengus Carroll and Lucas Ramón Mendos and published by ILGA. It is copyright-free provided you cite both the author and the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA). Suggested citation: International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association: Carroll, A. and Mendos, L.R., State Sponsored Homophobia 2017: A world survey of sexual orientation laws: criminalisation, protection and recognition (Geneva; ILGA, May 2017). This report is available to download in Word or PDF formats. Digital versions of the four ILGA maps of LGB legislation in the world are available for print. State-Sponsored Homophobia and its world maps are published simultaneously in English and Spanish, and will be available in Arabic, Chinese, French and Russian. Download the maps and reports at http://ilga.org or contact [email protected] Coordination: Renato Sabbadini Design and typesetting: Renné Ramos Maps: Eduardo Enoki STATE-SPONSORED HOMOPHOBIA - MAY 2017 CONTENT FOREWORD: CO-SECRETARIES-GENERAL: RUTH BALDACCHINO AND HELEN KENNEDY ............................................................................5 AUTHORS’ PREFACE: AENGUS CARROLL AND LUCAS RAMÓN MENDOS ...............................................................................................................7 STRENGTHENING SOGI PROTECTION AND UNPACKING INTERSECTIONALITY AT THE UNITED NATIONS IN 2016: ANDRÉ DU PLESSIS, DIANA CAROLINA PRADO MOSQUERA AND KSENIYA KIRICHENKO ............................................................ 13 LGB LEGISLATION GLOBAL OVERVIEW ..................................................................................25 SAME-SEX SEXUAL ACTS LEGAL .................................................26 HATE CRIMES BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION SAME-SEX SEXUAL ACTS ILLEGAL ...................................................37 CONSIDERED AN AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE .........................60 SAME-SEX SEXUAL ACTS - DEATH PENALTY ................................40 INCITEMENT TO HATRED BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION PROHIBITED ...............................................................63 PROMOTION (‘PROPAGANDA’) AND ‘MORALITY’ LAWS ...............41 BAN ON ‘CONVERSION THERAPIES’ .................................................67 BARRIERS TO SOGI NGOS ...................................................................46 MARRIAGE OPEN FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES ...................................68 CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION SPECIFYING SEXUAL ORIENTATION .................................................46 PARTNERSHIP RECOGNITION FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES ..............70 PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT JOINT ADOPTION BY SAME-SEX COUPLES ....................................73 BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION ....................................................48 SECOND PARENT ADOPTION ..............................................................75 CRIMINALISATION ...................................................................................................................79 AFRICA .....................................................................................................................................81 ALGERIA .................................................................................................81 MAURITIUS ............................................................................................95 ANGOLA .................................................................................................81 MOROCCO ..............................................................................................95 BOTSWANA ............................................................................................82 NAMIBIA .................................................................................................95 BURUNDI ...............................................................................................83 NIGERIA .................................................................................................96 CAMEROON ...........................................................................................84 SENEGAL ...............................................................................................97 COMOROS ..............................................................................................84 SIERRA LEONE ......................................................................................98 EGYPT ....................................................................................................85 SOMALIA ................................................................................................98 ERITREA .................................................................................................86 SOUTH SUDAN ......................................................................................99 ETHIOPIA ...............................................................................................87 SUDAN ................................................................................................. 100 GAMBIA ..................................................................................................88 SWAZILAND ........................................................................................ 100 GHANA ...................................................................................................89 TANZANIA ........................................................................................... 101 GUINEA ..................................................................................................90 KENYA ....................................................................................................90 TOGO ................................................................................................... 102 LIBERIA ..................................................................................................91 TUNISIA ............................................................................................... 103 LIBYA ......................................................................................................92 UGANDA ............................................................................................. 104 MALAWI .................................................................................................93 ZAMBIA ............................................................................................... 105 MAURITANIA .........................................................................................94 ZIMBABWE ......................................................................................... 106 AMERICAS ..............................................................................................................................108 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA................................................................. 108 JAMAICA ............................................................................................. 114 BARBADOS ......................................................................................... 109 ST KITTS & NEVIS .............................................................................. 116 DOMINICA ........................................................................................... 110 ST LUCIA ............................................................................................. 117 GRENADA ............................................................................................ 111 ST VINCENT & THE GRENADINES................................................... 118 GUYANA .............................................................................................. 112 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO .................................................................. 119 STATE-SPONSORED HOMOPHOBIA - MAY 2017 ASIA .......................................................................................................................................121 AFGHANISTAN ................................................................................... 121 MYANMAR .......................................................................................... 132 BANGLADESH .................................................................................... 121 OMAN .................................................................................................. 133 BHUTAN .............................................................................................. 122 PAKISTAN ............................................................................................ 133 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM ..................................................................... 123 QATAR .................................................................................................. 134 GAZA (IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY) ................ 124 SAUDI ARABIA ................................................................................... 135 INDIA ................................................................................................... 124 SINGAPORE ........................................................................................ 136 INDONESIA (SOUTH SUMATRA AND ACEH PROVINCE) ............. 125 SRI LANKA .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alexander the Great and Hephaestion
    2019-3337-AJHIS-HIS 1 Alexander the Great and Hephaestion: 2 Censorship and Bisexual Erasure in Post-Macedonian 3 Society 4 5 6 Same-sex relations were common in ancient Greece and having both male and female 7 physical relationships was a cultural norm. However, Alexander the Great is almost 8 always portrayed in modern depictions as heterosexual, and the disappearance of his 9 life-partner Hephaestion is all but complete in ancient literature. Five full primary 10 source biographies of Alexander have survived from antiquity, making it possible to 11 observe the way scholars, popular writers and filmmakers from the Victorian era 12 forward have interpreted this evidence. This research borrows an approach from 13 gender studies, using the phenomenon of bisexual erasure to contribute a new 14 understanding for missing information regarding the relationship between Alexander 15 and his life-partner Hephaestion. In Greek and Macedonian society, pederasty was the 16 norm, and boys and men did not have relations with others of the same age because 17 there was almost always a financial and power difference. Hephaestion was taller and 18 more handsome than Alexander, so it might have appeared that he held the power in 19 their relationship. The hypothesis put forward here suggests that writers have erased 20 the sexual partnership between Alexander and Hephaestion because their relationship 21 did not fit the norm of acceptable pederasty as practiced in Greek and Macedonian 22 culture or was no longer socially acceptable in the Roman contexts of the ancient 23 historians. Ancient biographers may have conducted censorship to conceal any 24 implication of femininity or submissiveness in this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough
    Indigenous identity in a contested land: A study of the Garifuna of Belize’s Toledo district Alexander Gough This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Lancaster University Law School 1 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisors. Alexander Gough, Lancaster University 21st September 2018 2 Abstract The past fifty years has seen a significant shift in the recognition of indigenous peoples within international law. Once conceptualised as the antithesis to European identity, which in turn facilitated colonial ambitions, the recognition of indigenous identity and responding to indigenous peoples’ demands is now a well-established norm within the international legal system. Furthermore, the recognition of this identity can lead to benefits, such as a stake in controlling valuable resources. However, gaining tangible indigenous recognition remains inherently complex. A key reason for this complexity is that gaining successful recognition as being indigenous is highly dependent upon specific regional, national and local circumstances. Belize is an example of a State whose colonial and post-colonial geographies continue to collide, most notably in its southernmost Toledo district. Aside from remaining the subject of a continued territorial claim from the Republic of Guatemala, in recent years Toledo has also been the battleground for the globally renowned indigenous Maya land rights case.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Sexual Consent
    Per Se or Power? Age and Sexual Consent Joseph J. Fischel* ABSTRACT: Legal theorists, liberal philosophers, and feminist scholars have written extensively on questions surrounding consent and sexual consent, with particular attention paid to the sorts of conditions that validate or vitiate consent, and to whether or not consent is an adequate metric to determine ethical and legal conduct. So too, many have written on the historical construction of childhood, and how this concept has influenced contemporary legal culture and more broadly informed civil society and its social divisions. Far less has been written, however, on a potent point of contact between these two fields: age of consent laws governing sexual activity. Partially on account of this under-theorization, such statutes are often taken for granted as reflecting rather than creating distinctions between adults and youth, between consensual competency and incapacity, and between the time for innocence and the time for sex. In this Article, I argue for relatively modest reforms to contemporary age of consent statutes but propose a theoretic reconstruction of the principles that inform them. After briefly historicizing age of consent statutes in the United States (Part I), I assert that the concept of sexual autonomy ought to govern legal regulations concerning age, age difference, and sexual activity (Part II). A commitment to sexual autonomy portends a lowered age of sexual consent, decriminalization of sex between minors, heightened legal supervision focusing on age difference and relations of dependence, more robust standards of consent for sex between minors and between minors and adults, and greater attention to the ways concerns about age, age difference, and sex both reflect and displace more normatively apt questions around gender, gendered power and submission, and queer sexuality (Part III).
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Psychology, Community & Health pch.psychopen.eu | 2182-438X Conference Abstracts Oral Presentations 1st International Conference on LGBT Psychology and Related Fields – Coming out for LGBT Psychology in the current international scenario (Lisbon, Portugal, 20-22 June 2013) Psychology, Community & Health, 2013, Vol. 2(2), 58±197, doi:10.5964/pch.v2i2.70 Published: 2013-6-10. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Table of Contents Abstracts Overview.................................................................................................................................................................................. 58 Abstracts.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69 Author Index............................................................................................................................................................................................ 195 Abstracts Overview A Cross-Cultural Study of the Positive and Negative Aspects of Being LGB.......................................................................................... 69 Jenna Marie Strizzi, Inmaculada Fernandez Agis, Raquel Alarcón Rodríguez, Tesifon Parrón Carreño
    [Show full text]
  • Homeland, Identity and Wellbeing Amongst the Beni-Amer in Eritrea-Sudan and Diasporas
    IM/MOBILITY: HOMELAND, IDENTITY AND WELLBEING AMONGST THE BENI-AMER IN ERITREA-SUDAN AND DIASPORAS Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester Saeid Hmmed BSc MSc (OU) Department of Geography University of Leicester September 2017 i Abstract This thesis focuses on how mobility, identity, conceptions of homeland and wellbeing have been transformed across time and space amongst the Beni-Amer. Beni-Amer pastoralist societies inhabit western Eritrea and eastern Sudan; their livelihoods are intimately connected to livestock. Their cultural identities, norms and values, and their indigenous knowledge, have revolved around pastoralism. Since the 1950s the Beni-Amer have undergone rapid and profound socio-political and geographic change. In the 1950s the tribe left most of their ancestral homeland and migrated to Sudan; many now live in diasporas in Western and Middle Eastern countries. Their mobility, and conceptions of homeland, identity and wellbeing are complex, mutually constitutive and cannot be easily untangled. The presence or absence, alteration or limitation of one of these concepts affects the others. Qualitatively designed and thematically analysed, this study focuses on the multiple temporalities and spatialities of Beni-Amer societies. The study subjected pastoral mobility to scrutiny beyond its contemporary theoretical and conceptual framework. It argues that pastoral mobility is currently understood primarily via its role as a survival system; as a strategy to exploit transient concentration of pasture and water across rangelands. The study stresses that such perspectives have contributed to the conceptualization of pastoral mobility as merely physical movement, a binary contrast to settlement; pastoral societies are therefore seen as either sedentary or mobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimate Concern: the Assault on the Concept of Rape
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Via Sapientiae: The Institutional Repository at DePaul University DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 9-2013 Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape Matthew David Burgess DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Burgess, Matthew David, "Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 153. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/153 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legitimate Concern: The Assault on the Concept of Rape A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Matthew David Burgess June 2013 Women’s and Gender Studies College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 1 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3 A Brief Legal History of Rape………………………………………………………………….....6 -Rape Law in the United States Prior to 1800…………………………………………….7 -The WCTU and
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions
    Durham E-Theses Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. SMAIRA, DIMA How to cite: SMAIRA, DIMA (2014) Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10810/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Changing Security: Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. Dima Smaira Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations. School of Government and International Affairs Durham University 2014 i Abstract This study is concerned with security; particularly security in Lebanon. It is also equally concerned with various means to improve security. Building on debates at the heart of world politics and Security Studies, this study first discusses trends in global governance, in the study of security, and in security assistance to post-conflict or developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am
    REPORT Nº 96/03 CASE 12.053 MAYA INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF THE TOLEDO DISTRICT BELIZE October 24, 2003 I. SUMMARY 1. This report concerns a petition presented to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (the "Commission”) against the State of Belize (the "State" or “Belize”) on August 7, 1998 by the Indian Law Resource Center and the Toledo Maya Cultural Council (the “Petitioners”). The petition claims that the State is responsible for violating rights under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (the “American Declaration”) that the Mopan and Ke’kchi Maya People of the Toledo District of Southern Belize (the “Maya people of the Toledo District” or the “Maya people”) are alleged to have over certain lands and natural resources.1 2. The Petitioners claim that the State has violated Articles I, II, III, VI, XI, XVIII, XX and XXIII of the American Declaration in respect of lands traditionally used and occupied by the Maya people, by granting logging and oil concessions in and otherwise failing to adequately protect those lands, failing to recognize and secure the territorial rights of the Maya people in those lands, and failing to afford the Maya people judicial protection of their rights and interests in the lands due to delays in court proceedings instituted by them. According to the Petitioners, the State’s contraventions have impacted negatively on the natural environment upon which the Maya people depend for subsistence, have jeopardized the Maya people and their culture, and threaten to cause further damage in the future. 3. The State has indicated before the Commission that applicable law and the facts presented by the Petitioners are unclear as to whether the Maya people may have aboriginal rights in the lands under dispute, although at the same time it has recognized in negotiations outside of the Commission proceedings that the Maya people have rights in lands in the Toledo District based upon their longstanding use and occupancy of that territory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global State of Lgbtiq Organizing
    THE GLOBAL STATE OF LGBTIQ ORGANIZING THE RIGHT TO REGISTER Written by Felicity Daly DrPH Every day around the world, LGBTIQ people’s human rights and dignity are abused in ways that shock the conscience. The stories of their struggles and their resilience are astounding, yet remain unknown—or willfully ignored—by those with the power to make change. OutRight Action International, founded in 1990 as the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, works alongside LGBTIQ people in the Global South, with offices in six countries, to help identify community-focused solutions to promote policy for lasting change. We vigilantly monitor and document human rights abuses to spur action when they occur. We train partners to expose abuses and advocate for themselves. Headquartered in New York City, OutRight is the only global LGBTIQ-specific organization with a permanent presence at the United Nations in New York that advocates for human rights progress for LGBTIQ people. [email protected] https://www.facebook.com/outrightintl http://twitter.com/outrightintl http://www.youtube.com/lgbthumanrights http://OutRightInternational.org/iran OutRight Action International 80 Maiden Lane, Suite 1505, New York, NY 10038 U.S.A. P: +1 (212) 430.6054 • F: +1 (212) 430.6060 This work may be reproduced and redistributed, in whole or in part, without alteration and without prior written permission, solely for nonprofit administrative or educational purposes provided all copies contain the following statement: © 2018 OutRight Action International. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of OutRight Action International. No other use is permitted without the express prior written permission of OutRight Action International.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child Was Extended to Anguilla on 7 September 1994
    UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/41/Add.7 22 February 2000 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Initial reports of States parties due in 1996 Addendum OVERSEAS DEPENDENT TERRITORIES AND CROWN DEPENDENCIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND*1 [26 May 1999] * This document submitted by the Government of the United Kingdom contains initial reports relating to the Crown Dependencies of Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn Island, St. Helena and its dependencies, the Turks and Caicos Islands. 1 Annexes referred to in the text are available for consultation in the secretariat. GE.00-40860 (E) CRC/C/41/Add.7 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ANGUILLA .......................................................................................... 1 - 53 3 BERMUDA........................................................................................... 54 - 129 13 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS................................................................ 130 - 185 36 CAYMAN ISLANDS............................................................................ 186 - 235 52 MONTSERRAT .................................................................................... 236 - 291 65 PITCAIRN ISLAND ............................................................................. 292 - 323 77 ST. HELENA AND ITS DEPENDENCIES..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) (Dáil Éireann
    Post-Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) (Dáil Éireann – Standing Order 164A) (Seanad Éireann – Standing Order 168) April 2019 Post Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) 1. Background to the Marriage Act 2015 A Constitutional Convention was established in 2012 to consider the question of whether an amendment should be made to the Constitution of Ireland to provide for marriage of same- sex couples. The Convention reported on that question in July 2013, and made 3 main recommendations: 1. That the Constitution be changed to allow for civil marriage for same-sex couples. 2. That an amendment be directive. 3. That further legislative change be made in the law on parentage, guardianship and upbringing of children. Almost 80% of the membership favoured changing the Constitution to allow for civil marriage for same-sex couples. The Government decided to hold a referendum on the question of allowing marriage to be contracted by two persons without distinction as to their sex. The Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Bill 2015 proposed to insert the following section after section 3 of Article 41 of the Constitution: “4 Marriage may be contracted in accordance with law by two persons without distinction as to their sex.” The marriage equality referendum was held on 22 May 2015 and had a turnout of 61% of the electorate. The referendum was passed by 62% of voters which meant Ireland became the first sovereign state to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples by popular vote. Only one constituency returned a negative vote.
    [Show full text]
  • (LGBT) in Brazil: a Spatial Analysis
    DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232020255.33672019 1709 A Homicídios da População de Lésbicas, Gays, Bissexuais, Travestis, rt I G Transexuais ou Transgêneros (LGBT) no Brasil: A O uma Análise Espacial rt IC Homicide of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Travestis, Transexuals, and LE Transgender people (LGBT) in Brazil: a Spatial Analysis Wallace Góes Mendes (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-7334) 1 Cosme Marcelo Furtado Passos da Silva (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-1671) 1 Abstract Violence against LGBT people has Resumo A violência contra Lésbicas, Gays, Bis- always been present in our society. Brazil is the sexuais, Travestis, Transexuais ou Transgêneros country with the highest number of lethal cri- (LGBT) sempre foi presente em nossa sociedade, mes against LGBT people in the world. The aim sendo o Brasil “o país que mais registra crimes le- of this study was to describe the characteristics of tais contra essa população no mundo”. O objetivo homicides of LGBT people in Brazil using spatial foi descrever as características dos homicídios de analysis. The LGBT homicide rate was used to fa- LGBT ocorridos no Brasil por meio de uma aná- cilitate the visualization of the geographical dis- lise espacial. Utilizou-se a taxa de homicídios de tribution of homicides. Public thoroughfares and LGBT para facilitar a visualização da distribuição the victim’s home were the most common places geográfica dos homicídios. As vias públicas e as re- of occurrence. The most commonly used methods sidências das vítimas são os lugares mais comuns for killing male homosexuals and transgender pe- das ocorrências dos crimes. As armas brancas são ople were cold weapons and firearms, respectively; as mais usadas no acometimento contra homosse- however, homicides frequently involved beatings, xuais masculinos e as armas de fogo para trans- suffocation, and other cruelties.
    [Show full text]