DOCSLIB.ORG

Topic 11: Convergence What Is Convergence? What Is Convergence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Topic 11: Convergence What Is Convergence? What Is Convergence 8/19/2013 Topic 11: Convergence What is convergence? What is convergence? How can convergence be detected? Emerald Tree Boas and Green Tree Do we see convergence? Pythons What are the classic herp examples? show a remarkable Have they been formally studied? level of convergence Photos © KP Bergmann, Philadelphia Zoo (adult ETB) What is convergence? What is convergence? Several patterns are ________________ conflated into convergence: Phylogenetic term _____________ Previously defined as _____________ the similarity of a _____________ character between taxa due to convergence “True” _______________ However, it includes: All mean slightly different True convergence things Reversal Parallelism Being clear on definitions is important These have similar effects on phylogeny reconstruction Snake-like Adults with gill slits Photos © KP Bergmann, Philadelphia Zoo Pough et al. 2004, Fig 3-1 What is convergence? What is convergence? _____________ Lerista ________________ (Scincidae) When evolution switches _______________ Independent evolution A recently evolved of similar traits in character is lost related lineages whose common ancestor did A recently lost character not share that trait is re-evolved (Futuyma 1986) Parallelism generally Example: involves a homologous Bachia digit loss and re- ____________________ evolution Generally closely related Derived species tend to lineages (not always) have _______________ 5 digits is ancestral Digit loss This has not been tested in Lerista , but is likely Digit gain Kohlsdorf & Wagner 2006; Photo © E Alzate Greer 1990 1 8/19/2013 What is convergence? What is convergence? __________________ How is convergence viewed? A B C D E F G H Phylogeny Independent evolution _______________ of similar traits in _______________ independent lineages, Confounds ability to often by ___________ accurately reconstruct ______________ C phylogeny A mistake in coding? B E Difference from D F Biology in general parallelism can be G C blurred ____________________ A ____________________ B E H D F Adaptation by different G “when two taxa evolve Root taxa to similar situations to be more similar to A one another than their A phylogenetic perspective H ancestors were to each is important to studying it other” (Stayton 2008) Stayton 2008 Stayton 2008 How can convergence be detected? How can convergence be detected? Pattern 2: Two ________ What kinds of patterns ____________________ does convergence result ____________________ in? The two taxa may be quite different in some Pattern 1: Two different ways, similar in others taxa converging ________ Trait 2 Trait 2 Trait _____________ What we typically think of as convergence Trait 1 Trait 1 Stayton, 2006; Photos © KP Bergmann, Philadelphia Zoo Stayton, 2006; Photo www.digimorph.org How can convergence be detected? Do we see convergence? Pattern 3: Two different What pattern of convergence are each of these taxa evolving _________ examples? Why? ____________________ Parallel evolution, but NOT necessarily parallelism The ____________ 2 Trait ______________ are convergent, even if the phenotype is not Trait 1 More typical of very unrelated taxa (?) Pufferfishes and Tail as a fat Suite of morphological horned lizards? storage organ & behavioral traits Stayton, 2006; Photos ??, PJB Photos © PJB, KP Bergmann, Philadelphia Zoo 2 8/19/2013 Do we see Do we see convergence? convergence? What are the herp examples? Fossoriality Fusion of skull Snake-like body form (BE & LR) in _________________ squamates Small relative head size Limited cranial kinesis Has evolved __________ Feed on smaller prey independently than non-fossorial Has occurred in two ways, but relatives within each, we still have convergence __________________ __________________ Examples: What pattern of convergence? Gymnophiona Amphisbaenia Scolecophidia What pattern is this? Brandley et al. 2008; Bergmann 2013 www.digimorph.org Do we see convergence? Do we see convergence? Clinging ability increases with ____________ & ___________ Adhesive pads on digits Skinks are poor clingers for their body mass – pads are Gekkonidae smaller, less effective Evolved 3 times in squamates Scales modified to have fine keratinous hairs called ____________ Anolis Same mechanism of action (________________ forces) Also seen in some inverts, like tarantulas Prasinohaema What pattern is this? Photos: KP Bergmann, USDA, Afco Zoo Supplies; SEMs: Williams and Peterson, 1982. Photos: KP Bergmann, USDA, Afco Zoo Supplies; Graph: Irschick et al. 1996 Do we see convergence? Do we see convergence? Iguanidae and “Agamidae” Iguanidae and “Agamidae” More examples ____________________ What pattern do we see here? New & Old World, respectively Ecological analogs look very similar Many instances of convergence Adaptation to _____________ Perhaps a lizard’s shape can be modified in only certain ways e.g. a laterally flattened tail may be the easiest way for a lizard to adapt to swimming Photos © K Bergmann, K Derby Photos: PJB, K Bergmann, Pough et al., E Rudolph 3 8/19/2013 Do we see convergence? Do we see convergence? Iguanidae vs. “Agamidae” Phrynosoma vs. Moloch Most of these examples Similar morphology are relatively slight Both eat ants examples of convergence _________________ _________________ Phrynosoma & Moloch _________________ horridus is more complex _________________ _________________ Different from generalist lizards _________________ No body lunge Slow-moving Faster tongue ____________________ protrusion Have micro-grooves that Faster feeding cycle allow them to gather Don’t process prey water in dry deserts Photos: © PJB, J Meyers Meyers and Herrel 2005 Do we see convergence? Do we see convergence? Reduction in shell defenses in insular giant tortoises Herbivory in lizards Independent evolution of a saddle-backed shell in the Comparison of skull shape Mascarine islands Comparing ___________ Similar patterns on Galapagos, Aldabra to non-herbivore sister group Herbivores tend to “move” towards a common area of morphospace, relative to sister groups Herbivores tend to evolve skulls with higher mechanical advantage __________________ __________________ What pattern is this? Austin and Arnold 2001 Stayton 2006 Do we see convergence? Do we see convergence? Convergence in Unrelated rock-dwelling lizards have a saxicolous lizards flat body and long limbs In general, saxicolous Live on vertical rock surfaces taxa have evolved: ________________ Seen in: ________________ Petrosaurus (Phrynosomatinae) Platysaurus (Cordylidae) Petrosaurus has evolved Pseudocordylus (Cordylidae) a shallower head, but Anolis bartschi ( Polychrotinae) not longer limbs Some tropidurines PC-2: Head depth PC-2: Has this body shape evolved along the branch on the phylogeny that also led to saxicoly? PC-1: Limb length Photos © Branch, Kober Revell et al. 2007 4 8/19/2013 Do we see Convergence? Do we see Convergence? _______________________ Anolis ecomorphs mtDNA sequence phylogeny Morphometric data, distance clustering Ecomorphs evolved multiple times on different Greater Antillean islands Each ecomorph clusters separately from others in morphospace Does this represent convergence? Need to look at the morphology Convergence is going on, but what pattern? From Losos et al., 1998 From Losos et al., 1998 Do we see Convergence? Anolis ecomorphs ___________________ plays a role Same ecomorphs, but different sequence of evolution _________________ do not fall into ecomorphs Irschick et al. 1997; Losos et al., 1998 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Article the Last European Varanid: Demise and Extinction of Monitor Lizards (Squamata, Varanidae) from Europe
    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e1301946 (7 pages) Ó by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2017.1301946 ARTICLE THE LAST EUROPEAN VARANID: DEMISE AND EXTINCTION OF MONITOR LIZARDS (SQUAMATA, VARANIDAE) FROM EUROPE GEORGIOS L. GEORGALIS,*,1,2 ANDREA VILLA,2 and MASSIMO DELFINO2,3 1Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musee 6, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland, [email protected]; 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Torino, Italy, massimo.delfi[email protected]; [email protected]; 3Institut Catala de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Edifici ICTA-ICP, Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT—Remains of a varanid lizard from the middle Pleistocene of the Tourkobounia 5 locality near Athens, Greece are described. The new material comprises cranial elements only (one maxilla, one dentary, and one tooth) and is attributed to Varanus, the genus to which all European Neogene varanid occurrences have been assigned. Previously, the youngest undisputed varanid from Europe had been recovered from upper Pliocene sediments. The new Greek fossils therefore constitute the youngest records of this clade from the continent. Despite being fragmentary, this new material enhances our understanding of the cranial anatomy of the last European monitor lizards and is clearly not referable to the extant Varanus griseus or Varanus niloticus, the only species that could be taken into consideration on a present-day geographic basis. However, these fossils could represent a survivor of the monitor lizards of Asian origin that inhabited Europe during the Neogene.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-National Conservation of Alligator Lizards
    MULTI-NATIONAL CONSERVATION OF ALLIGATOR LIZARDS: APPLIED SOCIOECOLOGICAL LESSONS FROM A FLAGSHIP GROUP by ADAM G. CLAUSE (Under the Direction of John Maerz) ABSTRACT The Anthropocene is defined by unprecedented human influence on the biosphere. Integrative conservation recognizes this inextricable coupling of human and natural systems, and mobilizes multiple epistemologies to seek equitable, enduring solutions to complex socioecological issues. Although a central motivation of global conservation practice is to protect at-risk species, such organisms may be the subject of competing social perspectives that can impede robust interventions. Furthermore, imperiled species are often chronically understudied, which prevents the immediate application of data-driven quantitative modeling approaches in conservation decision making. Instead, real-world management goals are regularly prioritized on the basis of expert opinion. Here, I explore how an organismal natural history perspective, when grounded in a critique of established human judgements, can help resolve socioecological conflicts and contextualize perceived threats related to threatened species conservation and policy development. To achieve this, I leverage a multi-national system anchored by a diverse, enigmatic, and often endangered New World clade: alligator lizards. Using a threat analysis and status assessment, I show that one recent petition to list a California alligator lizard, Elgaria panamintina, under the US Endangered Species Act often contradicts the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN and EVOLUTION of SNAKE EYES Dissertation
    CONQUERING THE COLD SHUDDER: THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF SNAKE EYES Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Christopher L. Caprette, B.S., M.S. **** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Thomas E. Hetherington, Advisor Approved by Jerry F. Downhower David L. Stetson Advisor The graduate program in Evolution, John W. Wenzel Ecology, and Organismal Biology ABSTRACT I investigated the ecological origin and diversity of snakes by examining one complex structure, the eye. First, using light and transmission electron microscopy, I contrasted the anatomy of the eyes of diurnal northern pine snakes and nocturnal brown treesnakes. While brown treesnakes have eyes of similar size for their snout-vent length as northern pine snakes, their lenses are an average of 27% larger (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.042). Based upon the differences in the size and position of the lens relative to the retina in these two species, I estimate that the image projected will be smaller and brighter for brown treesnakes. Northern pine snakes have a simplex, all-cone retina, in keeping with a primarily diurnal animal, while brown treesnake retinas have mostly rods with a few, scattered cones. I found microdroplets in the cone ellipsoids of northern pine snakes. In pine snakes, these droplets act as light guides. I also found microdroplets in brown treesnake rods, although these were less densely distributed and their function is unknown. Based upon the density of photoreceptors and neural layers in their retinas, and the predicted image size, brown treesnakes probably have the same visual acuity under nocturnal conditions that northern pine snakes experience under diurnal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA Mark N. Hutchinson & Stephen C. Donnellan 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA This review summarises the current hypotheses of the origin, antiquity and history of the order Squamata, the dominant living reptile group which comprises the lizards, snakes and worm-lizards. The primary concern here is with the broad relationships and origins of the major taxa rather than with local distributional or phylogenetic patterns within Australia. In our review of the phylogenetic hypotheses, where possible we refer principally to data sets that have been analysed by cladistic methods. Analyses based on anatomical morphological data sets are integrated with the results of karyotypic and biochemical data sets. A persistent theme of this chapter is that for most families there are few cladistically analysed morphological data, and karyotypic or biochemical data sets are limited or unavailable. Biogeographic study, especially historical biogeography, cannot proceed unless both phylogenetic data are available for the taxa and geological data are available for the physical environment. Again, the reader will find that geological data are very uncertain regarding the degree and timing of the isolation of the Australian continent from Asia and Antarctica. In most cases, therefore, conclusions should be regarded very cautiously. The number of squamate families in Australia is low. Five of approximately fifteen lizard families and five or six of eleven snake families occur in the region; amphisbaenians are absent. Opinions vary concerning the actual number of families recognised in the Australian fauna, depending on whether the Pygopodidae are regarded as distinct from the Gekkonidae, and whether sea snakes, Hydrophiidae and Laticaudidae, are recognised as separate from the Elapidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA Harold G. Cogger 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA The Squamata are members of the diapsid subclass Lepidosauromorpha, a group whose only living descendants are the lizards, amphisbaenians, snakes and tuataras. The lizards, amphisbaenians and snakes together constitute the Order Squamata (or Superorder Squamata, according to Estes 1983). Because the Squamata include approximately 95% of living reptiles, the phylogenetic position of this group within the Lepidosauromorpha, its component taxa, and their diagnostic features, have been the subject of numerous reviews (Estes & Pregill 1988; Kluge 1989). The three suborders of the Squamata include the Sauria (lizards) and the Serpentes (snakes), which are represented in Australia by diverse faunas of nearly 500 species, and 250 species, respectively. The third suborder, the Amphisbaenia, comprises a small group of worm lizards and related species which do not occur in Australia. The earliest known squamate fossils date from the late Permian and early Triassic, approximately 230 million years ago. These early fossils were already clearly lizard-like in their preserved features. Carroll (1988a) points out that lizards (the first squamates) do not appear to have originated as a result of ‘...a significant shift in behavioral patterns or the evolution of major new structural elements, but rather may be seen as resulting from the gradual accumulation of improvements in feeding, locomotion, and sensory apparatus.’ Carroll (1988b) includes among these changes the emargination of the lower temporal fenestra and the development of a joint between the upper end of the quadrate and the squamosal.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of North American Batrachia
    ^— ^ z {/, — £ 00 ± LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN iNSTITUTlOr llinillSNI NVINOSHill^S S3 I HVd an, BRARIEs'^SMITHSONlAN^INSTITUTlON"'NOIiniliSNrNVINOSHillNs'^S3iavyai CD ' Z -• _j 2 _i llinillSNI NviNOSHims S3iav8an libraries Smithsonian institutio- r- ^ I- rr ^^ Z 03 30 NOIinillSNrNVINOSHimS I B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTION S3 d VH 8 ... tn to t^ 2 v>. z , I ^ iiniiiSNi NviN0SHims'^S3idvaan libraries Smithsonian institutioi — ,r\ — tr\ "n braries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi NviNOSHims S3idV8ai '^ z ^ Z C ' — rn _ _ ^ to ± CO _ )linillSNI NVINOSHimS S3IHVMan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIOI '^ BRARIEs'^SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHlllNs'^S 3 I « V d 8 — ~ - "^ CO ^ CO DiiniiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iav«an libraries Smithsonian institutici r- z I- ^ ^ Z CD .^ V ^ ^ y" /c^xff^ ^ O JJlfcr ^Ai\ J- J!/r A/Mr v-» •'SSSSStS 'sk -'- lsC< >^s\ O SS^is^v 'Sv i % </) ^. 2 * W Z </, 2 , _ lES SMITHSONIAN__ INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI_NIVINOSHllWS S3IMVdan_LIB, Oi I IT^'lI B I ES^SMITHS0NIAN"'|NSTITUTI0N NOII LSNI^'NVINOSHimS^SH dVH 8 RAR "" - r- ^ z r- 2 lES SMITHS0NIAN~INSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI~NVINOSHimS SBIMVyan LIB t/> ^ z, </) z ^^5"' ^. Z X LSNi NviN0SHims*^S3idvyan libraries Smithsonian institution noij «/> 5 eo = t/> ^^ z .J z _ _ . ^ B lES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I M Va 8 n_l-l z r- _^ 2 o z: /(^^^}>\ o '^°' iSNTNYINOSHimS S3 I aVH 8 n""LI B RAR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN-INSTITUTION,'w JES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3IHVyan_^'^ *A "• frt — */\ »• a: < NOIJ LSNI~'NVINOSHilWS S3 I W VH 8 ll'^LI B RAR I ES^SMITHSONIAN^INSTITUTION~ r- , Z r- 2 .lES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3ldVdan^LIB J *^ t/> ^ .^-TT^v.
    [Show full text]
  • Waite's Blind Snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 1999 Records of the Australian Museum (1999) Vol. 51: 43–56. ISSN 0067–1975 Waite’s Blind Snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae): Identification of Sources and Correction of Errors GLENN M. SHEA Department of Veterinary Anatomy & Pathology, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The majority of the 542 typhlopid specimens examined by Edgar Waite for his 1918 monograph of the family are identified, and their current status discussed. Most Waite records that do not correspond with the distribution based on modern records are shown to be in error, involving either misidentifications, misreadings of localities, or transposition of data. A few remaining problematic records are considered dubious due to a lack of supporting data. Ramphotyphlops batillus (Waite, 1894), known only from the holotype from Wagga Wagga, NSW, is restored to the Australian fauna, and new data on the type are provided. Probable paratypes for Typhlops grypus (SAM R849; QM J2947), T. proximus (AM R615, R145401– 07, SAM R915) and T. subocularis (AM R2169) are identified. New data on dorsal scale counts are provided for Ramphotyphlops leucoproctus (377–394), R. polygrammicus (370–422), R. proximus (326– 392), R. wiedii (381–439) and R. yirrikalae (447–450). SHEA, GLENN M., 1999. Waite’s blind snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae): identification of sources and correction of errors. Records of the Australian Museum 51(1): 43–56. Although a number of species of Australian typhlopid work, particularly his key, distribution maps and figures, snakes had been described by European herpetologists in has been the main source of much of the subsequent the nineteenth century, notably Wilhelm Peters and George literature on Australian typhlopids.
    [Show full text]
  • Epictia-1.Pdf
    The Leptotyphlopidae, descriptively called threadsnakes or wormsnakes, is one of five families comprising the most ancient but highly specialized clade of snakes, the Scolecophidia, which dates back to the Jurassic Period (ca. 155 mya). Scolecophidians are the least studied and poorest known group of snakes, both biologically and taxonomically. Due to their subterranean habitat, nocturnal lifestyle, small size, and drab coloration, these snake are extremely difficult to find and seldom are observed or collected. Epictia is one of six genera found in the New World, with a distribution extending throughout Latin America. Whereas most Epictia are uniform brown or black, some species are brightly colored. Epictia tenella, the most wide-ranging member of the genus, occurs throughout much of northern South America. Pictured here is an individual from Trinidad that exhibits several distinctive features, including yellow zigzag stripes, relatively large bulging eyes, contact of the supraocular and anterior supralabial shields, and the presence of numerous sensory pits on the anterior head shields. ' © John C. Murphy 215 www.mesoamericanherpetology.com www.eaglemountainpublishing.com ISSN 2373-0951 Version of record:urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6B8D5BF-2E06-485A-BD7F-712D8D57CDE4 Morphological review and taxonomic status of the Epictia phenops species group of Mesoamerica, with description of six new species and discussion of South American Epictia albifrons, E. goudotii, and E. tenella (Serpentes: Leptotyphlopidae: Epictinae) VAN WALLACH 4 Potter Park, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States. E–mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: I examined the “Epictia phenops species group” of Mesoamerica, and recognize 11 species as valid (E. ater, E. bakewelli, E. columbi, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Calibration Dates for Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Snakes 1: Serpentes, Alethinophidia, Boidae, Pythonidae
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Fossil calibration dates for molecular phylogenetic analysis of snakes 1: Serpentes, Alethinophidia, Boidae, Pythonidae Jason J. Head ABSTRACT Snakes possess a dense fossil record through the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic and are an important clade for studies of molecular phylogenetics. The use of the snake fossil record has historically been a limited and inaccurate source of temporal data in molecular studies due to taxonomic and phylogenetic ambiguities. Here I pro- vide 10 fossil calibration dates for phylogenetic analysis of higher-order interrelation- ships of snakes. Calibration points include apomorphy-based systematic justifications and precise dates for hard minimum divergence timings. Calibrated nodes are for the snake total clade, Alethinophidia, and boid and pythonid taxa. Hard minimum diver- gence timings range from earliest late Cretaceous to middle Miocene. These dates provide precise minima for constraining the early evolutionary history of Serpentes. Comparisons of phylogenetically justified calibrations with published studies that employed form-taxon assignments suggests greatly younger divergences for justified nodes and indicates that deep-time divergence estimates that have been correlated with tectonic histories may be considerably too old and reliant on presumptions of Early Cretaceous Gondwanan vicariance as a mechanism of speciation. Jason J. Head. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and Nebraska State Museum of Natural History University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Miniaturization in Squamates: A
    CHARACTERISTICS OF MINIATURIZATION IN SQUAMATES: A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE FROM CRANIAL MORPHOLOGY ___________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences Sam Houston State University ___________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science ___________ by Maria Camila Vallejo Pareja August, 2018 CHARACTERISTICS OF MINIATURIZATION IN SQUAMATES: A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE FROM CRANIAL MORPHOLOGY by Maria Camila Vallejo Pareja ___________ APPROVED: Juan Diego Daza, PhD Committee Director Christopher Randle, PhD Committee Co-Director Monte L. Thies, PhD Committee Member Jessica Anderson Maisano, PhD Committee Member John B. Pascarella, PhD Dean, College of Sciences and Engineering Technology DEDICATION A Mariana y Manuel, A Nacho y a Silvia, A Carito y Juanis. Con infinita gratitud. iii ABSTRACT Vallejo Pareja, Maria Camila, Characteristics of miniaturization in squamates: A phylogenetic perspective from cranial morphology. Master of Science (Biological Sciences), August, 2018, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas. Miniaturization is recurrent in tetrapods, and has been widely recognized to be an evolutionary process resulting from the occupation of previously unexploited niches (Hanken and Wake, 1993; Rieppel, 1984a, 1996). In this thesis I review the process of miniaturization and its effects on the skull of squamates (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians). I compiled a list of characteristics previously described for squamates and summarized the main differences among higher level groups (e.g., Iguania, Gekkota or Scincomorpha). I also investigated whether observed traits linked to miniaturization are the product of convergent evolution. I used a large published morphological data set that includes 204 species of which 54 are miniaturized. I coded characters for an additional species that represent the smallest known squamates (e.g., Sphaerodactylus ariasae and Brookesia micra) and belong to taxonomic groups with minor representation in the original dataset.
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Evolution of Snakes As Revealed by Mitogenomic Data
    The Molecular Evolution of Snakes as revealed by Mitogenomic Data Douglas, Desiree 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Douglas, D. (2008). The Molecular Evolution of Snakes as revealed by Mitogenomic Data. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 The Molecular Evolution of Snakes as Revealed by Mitogenomic Data DESIRÉE DOUGLAS Department of Cell and Organism Biology Division of Evolutionary Molecular Systematics Lund University 2008 A doctoral thesis at a university in Sweden is produced as a monograph or as a collection of papers. In the latter case, the introductory part constitutes the formal thesis, which summarizes the accompanying papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Reptiles: List of Species
    BRAZILIAN REPTILES: LIST OF SPECIES Concluded on September 30, 2012 ORGANIZED BY Renato Silveira Bérnils ([email protected]) and Henrique Caldeira Costa ([email protected]) The present List must be cited as: Bérnils, R. S. and H. C. Costa (org.). 2012. Brazilian reptiles: List of species. Version 2012.1. Available at http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br/. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. Downloaded on... [date of your download] ENDEMIC TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TAXA OF BRAZIL SPECIES TAXA* REPTILES no 738 784 TESTUDINES BATSCH, 1788 no 36 36 CRYPTODIRA COPE, 1868 no 11 11 Chelonioidea Baur, 1893 no 5 5 Cheloniidae Oppel, 1811 no 4 4 1 Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758) no 2 Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758) no 3 Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766) no 4 Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) no Dermochelyidae Fitzinger, 1843 no 1 1 5 Dermochelys coriacea (Linnaeus, 1766) no Kinosternoidea Joyce, Parham & Gauthier, 2004 no 1 1 Kinosternidae Agassiz, 1857 no 1 1 Kinosterninae Agassiz, 1857 no 1 1 6 Kinosternon scorpioides scorpioides (Linnaeus, 1766) no Testudinoidea Fitzinger, 1826 no 5 5 Emydidae Rafinesque, 1815 no 2 2 Deirochelyinae Agassiz, 1857 no 2 2 7 Trachemys adiutrix Vanzolini, 1995 1 yes 8 Trachemys dorbigni (Duméril & Bibron, 1835) 1 no Geoemydidae Theobald, 1868 no 1 1 9 Rhinoclemmys punctularia punctularia (Daudin, 1801) no Testudinidae Batsch, 1788 no 2 2 10 Chelonoidis carbonaria (Spix, 1824) no 11 Chelonoidis denticulata (Linnaeus, 1766) no 1 ENDEMIC TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TAXA OF BRAZIL SPECIES TAXA* PLEURODIRA COPE, 1864
    [Show full text]