DOCSLIB.ORG

Misopates Antirrhinum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Misopates Antirrhinum Misopates orontium and Antirrhinum majus: Testing the boundaries of evolution: to what extent can the differences between closely related genera be bridged by mutagenesis? Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig and Heinz Saedler Dept of Molecular Plant Genetics, Max-Planck-Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany Results continued Abstract Materials and Methods (8) The last point is in agreement with the following result: according to data repeated twice, in Antirrhinum, AmM1 is strongly expressed in the leaves, Mutagenesis: 310 000 Misopates plants have been investigated weakly in bracts, but there is no expression in the sepals. In Misopates, Of the seven features basically distinguishing however, expression is weak in the leaves, strong in the bracts and moderate (including 10 000 M families; treatment of seeds with fast neutrons or Misopates orontium from its closely related 2 in the sepals. Thus, at least a part of the leaf programme not expressed in A. gamma rays). Moreover, 1.5 million Antirrhinum plants (different majus sepals appears to be directly expressed in the sepals of Misopates. species Antirrhinum majus, five differences mutagens) have been studied during the last two decades. have phenotypically been clearly diminished or Fig.6: fully overcome by mutant genes, so that either Molecular work: Since locus identity test crosses between Misopates and Antirrhinum are not possible, the genes were identified by Misopates approaches, meets or even overlaps sequence analyses of the homologous Misopates wildtype genes and the characters of Antirrhinum or vice versa their mutant deviations. (aspects of the life cycle, leaf form, flower size, (9) Homeotic flower and inflorescence flower colour und mode of fertilization). Yet mutants of Misopates displayed features most of this phenotypic variation can also be Results never detected in Antirrhinum. Usually found on the subgeneric level within different these deviations were correlated with the loss of the differentiation Antirrhinum or Misopates species. However, to Misopates mutants approach, meet or even overlap the programmes for special bract- and Fig. 7: plena date the morphologically most distinguishing features of Antirrhinum and vice versa in the sepal morphology, i.e. the long sepal character between the two genera, the strongly following characters. elongated sepals in Misopates, could not be feature. The fimbriata mutant displayed some most unusual features, e.g. a reduced to that of the length of Antirrhinum nor (1) Life cycle: several mutants of Misopates (including a pedicel followed by a bush of sepals (but could the development of the short Antirrhinum female fertile one) display an extended life cycle (Fig. 2: no flowers) and internodes, pointing to sepals be extended to that of the length of from their normal 3-4 months to about a year and to time (possibly) further losses-of-functions. Fig. 8:fimbriata Misopates. This constancy of the most indefinite by cuttings). Also, some Antirrhinum lines are important generic difference addressed here is classified as annual. (10) Appearance of variegation pointing to TE activities in agreement with basic results of systematics (see Fig.9, below/left). and paleontology. (11) Jeong Hee Kim: Identifying the homeotic Misopates genes and mutants (see methods): Gene Mutation Plena large deletion Squamosa large deletion Floricaula nu: 1 sub, 12 bp deletion aa: 1 change, 4 aa deletion Fimbriata nu: 1 sub, 2 bp deletion, aa: frame shift, andstop Deficiens (weak allele) nu: 21 bp deletion aa: 7 aa deletion Deficiens (strong allele) nu: 7 bp deletion aa: frame shift and stop Cycloidea nu: 6 bp deletion aa: 2 aa deletion Discussion Figure 2 (above): Sister Fig. 3 (above): M. orontium plants of same age wildtype (left) and leaf mutant Unexpectedly the most important morphological diffe-rence (right); below: M. orontium leaf between the two species proved to be nearly invariable so mutant under white string,rest: far (except in syndromes in Misopates which were mostly Antirrhinum lines. highly disadvantageous). Among the possibilities buffering a feature against mutations (2) Leaf form: As shown above in Fig. 3, mutants of both belong: (a) characters due to losses of gene functions, (b) species overlap each other in this caracter, too. redundancy by functionally similar gene duplicates, (c) multiple functions including vital ones of one and the same Fig. 1: Antirrhinum (above) in comparison to Misopates (3) Flower size: M.orontium mutants gene. - In such cases mutations and selection are mostly (below). Note the enormously elongated sepals of Misopates. with larger flowers appeared regularly incapable to even out the differences found between closely in our field trials (Fig. 4). Also, in related species and genera. Antirrhinum, mutants with smaller The findings so far found for our pair of species are in flowers have repeatedly been agreement with the variation and constancy detected in Introduction described. In A. valentinum the systematics and paleontology (Lönnig and Saedler, 2002, flowers are as small as in M. and paper in preparation.) However, for a final answer the The synthetic theory (Neo-Darwinism) explains the origin orontium. Thus, the two genera material investigated is not extensive enough. of all differences in the organic world essentially by two overlap each other in this character Although our results do not yet falsify the synthetic theory, factors: random mutation and selection. To test the boundaries are hinted at which in the long run might show Fig.4: Left: larger as well. theory, a large mutagenesis programme with A. majus its limitations flower mutant of and M. orontium has been carried out focussing on the M. orontium (right: following questions (among others): wildtype). (1)Can the long Misopates sepals be reduced in one (or more) step(s) to that of the length of the Antirrhinum (4) Flower colour: Although M. orontium appears to be unable so far to approach the full red colour of A. majus, the mutants sepals or vice versa? Concluding Remarks of both species meet each other in their loss-of-function (2)To what extent can the rest of the different features be phenotypes (gradual reduction of anthocyanin synthesis until Many important questions are still open, for example: to what overcome by mutagenesis? pure white flowers are developed). extent are the mutant genes involved in the overlapping features of the two species also involved in the subgeneric (3)What do the homeotic flower- and inflorescence (5) Mode of fertilization: The wild Antirrhinum majus species is features of corresponding phenotypes of wild species of the mutants reveal about the genetic differences between a selfsterile outbreeder. In contrast, Misopates is selffertile two genera? What is the genetic basis of the constancy of the two genera? with a tendency to autogamy. Yet most of the Antirrhinum the long sepal feature of Misopates orontium? Would culture varieties (which are also mutants) are selffertile, too. mutagenesis by transposons produce qualitatively different In spite of “Dollo’s Law” several reversals have been results? reported for the history of the origin of species. At least quantitative morphological differences should not (6) The long Misopates sepals could not be reduced to that of the length of the sepals of Antirrhinum nor could the sepals of constitute an insurmountable barrier to test the Antirrhinum be extended to those of Misopates. In Misopates Acknowledgements possibilities and of the synthetic theory. any significant reduction was accompanied by some The help and advice of Britta Grosardt and Thomas Münster teratological feature. in methods of molecular genetics as well as that of Peter Huijser at the Binocular and photographer Maret Kalda is (7) Whenever the leaves of Misopates were affected by a gratefully acknowledged. mutant gene, the bracts and sepals were likewise affected. This does not necessarily happen in Antirrhinum (Fig. 5). Literature: Lönnig, W.-E. and H. Saedler (2002): Chromosome Rearrangements and Transposable Elements. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36: 398-410. Fig. 5: Width of sepals and leaves Lönnig, W.-E. and H.-A. Becker (2003): Natural Selection. (In Press.) are often not correlated in Antirrhinum. Left, above and (As well as 8 further refereed papers of 2001-2003.) below A. majus, ssp. majus, Fig. 9: First Right, A.m. ssp. tortuosum. recorded appearance of variegation in Misopates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Production of Pathogen-Tested Herbaceous Ornamentals
    EuropeanBlackwell Publishing Ltd and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization PM 4/34 (1) Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes Schemes for the production of healthy plants for planting Schémas pour la production de végétaux sains destinés à la plantation Production of pathogen-tested herbaceous ornamentals Specific scope Specific approval and amendment This standard describes the production of pathogen-tested First approved in 2007-09. material of herbaceous ornamental plants produced in glasshouse. This standard initially presents a generalized description of the 2. Maintenance and testing of candidate plants performance of a propagation scheme for the production of for nuclear stock pathogen tested plants and then, in the appendices, presents details of the ornamental plants for which it can be used 2.1 Growing conditions together with lists of pathogens of concern and recommended test methods. The performance of this scheme follows the general The candidate plants for nuclear stock should be kept ‘in sequence proposed by the EPPO Panel on Certification of quarantine’, that is, in an isolated, suitably designed, aphid-proof Pathogen-tested Ornamentals and adopted by EPPO Council house, separately from the nuclear stock and other material, (OEPP/EPPO, 1991). According to this sequence, all plant where it can be observed and tested. All plants should be grown material that is finally sold derives from an individual nuclear in individual pots containing new or sterilized growing medium stock plant that has been carefully selected and rigorously that are physically separated from each other to prevent any tested to ensure the highest practical health status; thereafter, direct contact between plants, with precautions against infection the nuclear stock plants and the propagation stock plants by pests.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Extent Can the Phenotypic Differences Between Misopates Orontium and Antirrhinum Majus Be Bridged by Mutagenesis?
    Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability ©2007 Global Science Books Biodiversity and Dollo’s Law: To What Extent can the Phenotypic Differences between Misopates orontium and Antirrhinum majus be Bridged by Mutagenesis? Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig1* • Kurt Stüber1 • Heinz Saedler1 • Jeong Hee Kim1 1 Max-Planck-Institute for Plant Breeding Reseach, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany Corresponding author : * [email protected] ABSTRACT According to Dollo’s law, evolution is irreversible. Yet, of the eight derived features essentially distinguishing Misopates orontium from its closely related Antirrhinum majus, five differences have phenotypically been clearly diminished or fully overcome by mutant genes, so that Misopates orontium outwardly approaches, meets or even overlaps the features of Antirrhinum majus or vice versa (aspects of the life cycle, leaf form, flower size, flower colour and mode of fertilization). However, to date the morphological key distinguishing feature between the two genera, the strongly elongated sepals in Misopates (itself a feature being at odds with Dollo’s law), could not be reduced to that of the length of Antirrhinum nor could the development of the short Antirrhinum sepals be extended to that of the length of Misopates, in spite of extensive mutagenesis programmes with both species (agreeing with Dollo’s law as to the stasis of this difference). Also, the long sepal character strongly dominated almost all homeotic Misopates mutants. After a general discussion of Dollo’s
    [Show full text]
  • An Everlasting Pioneer: the Story of Antirrhinum Research
    PERSPECTIVES 34. Lexer, C., Welch, M. E., Durphy, J. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. 62. Cooper, T. F., Rozen, D. E. & Lenski, R. E. Parallel und Forschung, the United States National Science Foundation Natural selection for salt tolerance quantitative trait loci changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of and the Max-Planck Gesellschaft. M.E.F. was supported by (QTLs) in wild sunflower hybrids: implications for the origin evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA National Science Foundation grants, which also supported the of Helianthus paradoxus, a diploid hybrid species. Mol. 100, 1072–1077 (2003). establishment of the evolutionary and ecological functional Ecol. 12, 1225–1235 (2003). 63. Elena, S. F. & Lenski, R. E. Microbial genetics: evolution genomics (EEFG) community. In lieu of a trans-Atlantic coin flip, 35. Peichel, C. et al. The genetic architecture of divergence experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and the order of authorship was determined by random fluctuation in between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414, genetic bases of adaptation. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, the Euro/Dollar exchange rate. 901–905 (2001). 457–469 (2003). 36. Aparicio, S. et al. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and 64. Ideker, T., Galitski, T. & Hood, L. A new approach to analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297, decoding life. Annu. Rev. Genom. Human. Genet. 2, Online Links 1301–1310 (2002). 343–372 (2001). 37. Beldade, P., Brakefield, P. M. & Long, A. D. Contribution of 65. Wittbrodt, J., Shima, A. & Schartl, M. Medaka — a model Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. organism from the far East.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucumber Mosaic Virus in Hawai‘I
    Plant Disease August 2014 PD-101 Cucumber Mosaic Virus in Hawai‘i Mark Dragich, Michael Melzer, and Scot Nelson Department of Plant Protection and Environmental Protection Sciences ucumber mosaic virus (CMV) is Pathogen one of the most widespread and The pathogen causing cucumber troublesomeC viruses infecting culti- mosaic disease(s) is Cucumber mo- vated plants worldwide. The diseases saic cucumovirus (Roossinck 2002), caused by CMV present a variety of although it is also known by other global management problems in a names, including Cucumber virus 1, wide range of agricultural and ecologi- Cucumis virus 1, Marmor cucumeris, cal settings. The elevated magnitude Spinach blight virus, and Tomato fern of risk posed by CMV is due to its leaf virus (Ferreira et al. 1992). This broad host range and high number of plant pathogen is a single-stranded arthropod vectors. RNA virus having three single strands Plant diseases caused by CMV of RNA per virus particle (Ferreira occur globally. Doolittle and Jagger et al. 1992). CMV belongs to the first reported the characteristic mosaic genus Cucumovirus of the virus symptoms caused by the virus in 1916 family Bromoviridae. There are nu- on cucumber. The pandemic distribu- merous strains of CMV that vary in tion of cucumber mosaic, coupled with their pathogenicity and virulence, as the fact that it typically causes 10–20% well as others having different RNA yield loss where it occurs (although it Mosaic symptoms associated with satellite virus particles that modify can cause 100% losses in cucurbits) Cucumber mosaic virus on a nau- pathogen virulence and plant disease makes it an agricultural disease of paka leaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Kohn JR (2004) Historical Inferences from the Self-Incompatibility Locus
    Chapter 5 What Genealogies of S-alleles Tell Us J.R. Kohn Abstract Drawing on examples from S-RNase-based self-incompatibility (SI), S- locus genealogies are used to infer the demographic history of lineages, the history of mating-system transitions in entire plant families and aspects of the evolution of the S-locus itself. Two lineages of Solanaceae suffered severe restrictions of S-locus diversity evident after millions of years. Broadly shared ancestral S-locus polymorphism is evidence that loss of this form of incompatibility was irreversible in the Solanaceae. Frequent and irreversible loss implies incompatibility is either declining in frequency through time, or that it confers an increased diversification rate relative to self-compatibility (SC). Differences in diversification rate among self-incompatible and self-compatible lineages likely cause the failure of current phylogenetic methods to correctly reconstruct the history of SI. Genealogies also show that origination of new S-RNases rarely occurs within the lifetimes of species. Surprisingly, genealogies of F-box genes purported to provide pollen specificity often do not correspond to those of their cognate S-RNases, indicating we have much to learn about how this system works and evolves. Abbreviations cpDNA DNA from plant plastids GSI Gametophytic SI mya Million years ago SC Self-compatibility SCR/SP11 S-locus cysteine-rich protein (the pollen S-determinant in Brassica) J.R. Kohn Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla CA, 92093–0116 USA, e-mail: [email protected] V.E. Franklin-Tong (ed.) Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants – Evolution, Diversity, 103 and Mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae Are Further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales)
    Research Paper 1 The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae are further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales) R. Rahmanzadeh1, K. Müller2, E. Fischer3, D. Bartels1, and T. Borsch2 1 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie und Biotechnologie der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany 2 Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften ± Biologie, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstraûe 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany Received: July 14, 2004; Accepted: September 22, 2004 Abstract: The Lamiales are one of the largest orders of angio- Traditionally, Craterostigma, Lindernia and their relatives have sperms, with about 22000 species. The Scrophulariaceae, as been treated as members of the family Scrophulariaceae in the one of their most important families, has recently been shown order Lamiales (e.g., Takhtajan,1997). Although it is well estab- to be polyphyletic. As a consequence, this family was re-classi- lished that the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are their first fied and several groups of former scrophulariaceous genera branching families (Bremer et al., 2002; Hilu et al., 2003; Soltis now belong to different families, such as the Calceolariaceae, et al., 2000), little is known about the evolutionary diversifica- Plantaginaceae, or Phrymaceae. In the present study, relation- tion of most of the orders diversity. The Lamiales branching ships of the genera Craterostigma, Lindernia and its allies, hith- above the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are called ªcore erto classified within the Scrophulariaceae, were analyzed. Se- Lamialesº in the following text. The most recent classification quences of the chloroplast trnK intron and the matK gene by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG2, 2003) recognizes (~ 2.5 kb) were generated for representatives of all major line- 20 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Flowering of Antirrhinum Majus L. Under Varying Temperatures
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY 1560–8530/2004/06–1–173–178 http://www.ijab.org Growth and Flowering of Antirrhinum majus L. under Varying Temperatures MUHAMMAD MUNIR1, MUHAMMAD JAMIL, JALAL-UD-DIN BALOCH AND KHALID REHMAN KHATTAK Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan 1Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Plants of an early flowering cultivar ‘Chimes White’ of Antirrhinum were subjected to three temperature regimes (0, 10 and 20°C) at 6-leaf pair stage to observe their effects on the flowering time and plant quality. Plants at higher temperature (20°C) flowered earlier (86 days) than the lower ones i.e. 109 days (10°C) and 145 days (0°C). However, maximum flower numbers (33) were counted in plants at 10°C followed by 20°C (29). Plants at 0°C produced only seven flower buds. The quality of plants was improved at 10°C temperature; whereas, it was poor at 0°C. Key Words: Antirrhinum majus; Flowering; Temperature INTRODUCTION optimum temperatures were required, as photosynthesis was the dominant process (Miller, 1962). Temperature has a direct influence on the rate of many Flowering time in Antirrhinum was shown to be chemical reactions, including respiration that is the process controlled by adjusting night temperatures in relation to responsible for growth and development of plants and light intensity during the day. Earlier flowering resulted, photosynthesis. For most species, biological activity stops after adjusting night temperatures upward during the below 0°C and above 50°C, and proteins are irreversibly growing period after bright winter days.
    [Show full text]
  • Antirrhinum Multiflorum
    Antirrhinum multiflorum Scientific Name: Antirrhinum multiflorum Family: Scrophulariaceae Synonyms: Sairocarpus multiflorus Common Name: Multiflower Snapdragon Sticky Snapdragon Sierra Snapdragon Rose Snapdragon Withered Snapdragon Native California Coast: Chaparral Areas Mediterranean Climate Prone to Wildfires Gravel to Rocky, Sandy to Clay Loam Characteristics Habit: 2-5’ laterally branching stems ending in terminal racemes Flowers: Personate corollas lack pronounced spur Leaves: alternate, narrow, lanceolate Fruit: oblique to ovid shaped capsule 7-11mm long Cultural Requirements Facultative Long Day Zones 8-10 Requires excellent soil drainage pH 5.5-5.8 Sensative to Soluble Salt Buildup Pests: Thrips, Aphids, Pytium, Mildew Propagation Germination Temperature 65F Sow Uncovered or with Thin Vermiculite Layer Growth High Irradiance can Enhance Flowering Average Day Temp 67F Fertilize 150ppm N excess fertilizer can cause excess side shoots Responds to B9 to control stretch Crop Time approximately 10-14weeks Market Qualities Attracts hummingbirds and butterflies Resistant to deer Use Bedding, Border, Cut Flower, Garden Crop Issues Poor Germination Production Schedule Stage 1: Germination Light not necessary Soil temp 65-70F High humidity encourages germination pH 5.5-6 Stage 2: Emergence Facultative Long Day Even moisture but not saturated Begin fertilizing with 50ppm N Addition of Ca and K may also be necessary Production Schedule Stage 3: True Leaves Developing Lower Temperature 60-65F 100-150ppm N Fertilization Leaching soil with clear water may be necessary to rid plugs of excess soluble salts Maintain good ventilation as prolonged wetness can cause tip abortion Stage 4: Transplant Ready Increase Fertilizer to 150-200ppm N Note: excess fertilizer can cause increased side shoots Flower initiation at 5-10 leaf sets Note: Night temperature helps to control flowering time Optimum night temperature 55F Works Cited "Antirrhinum Forcing Guide." Sakata Seed America Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgenesis of Tomato: Relevance in Molecular Research Today
    IJSAR, 4(7), 2017; 103-112 International Journal of Sciences & Applied Research www.ijsar.in Transgenesis of tomato: Relevance in molecular research today Somnath Mondal and Surekha Kundu* Molecular and Applied Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Calcutta 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, India. Corresponding author: *Surekha Kundu, Molecular and Applied Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Calcutta 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, India. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Tomato is not only one of the most important of vegetable crops but also is an important dicotyledonous model plant for scientific research. Genetic transformation of tomato is often the first step of various scientific researches to follow. Along with the view to generating tomato lines with diverse desirable traits transformed tomato serve as the background of doing functional studies. There are many transformation protocols for tomato and these have their advantages and dis-advantages. The selection of the desirable traits, the appropriate promoter/terminator sequences, suitable selectable markers and reporter genes are to be critically considered. A number of different transgenic lines of tomato are available today that have improved nutritional content, better shelf life, resistance to biotic/abiotic stresses and even for development of vaccines and as tools in immunotherapy. The importance
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Garden History Plant Lists
    Southern Plant Lists Southern Garden History Society A Joint Project With The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation September 2000 1 INTRODUCTION Plants are the major component of any garden, and it is paramount to understanding the history of gardens and gardening to know the history of plants. For those interested in the garden history of the American south, the provenance of plants in our gardens is a continuing challenge. A number of years ago the Southern Garden History Society set out to create a ‘southern plant list’ featuring the dates of introduction of plants into horticulture in the South. This proved to be a daunting task, as the date of introduction of a plant into gardens along the eastern seaboard of the Middle Atlantic States was different than the date of introduction along the Gulf Coast, or the Southern Highlands. To complicate maters, a plant native to the Mississippi River valley might be brought in to a New Orleans gardens many years before it found its way into a Virginia garden. A more logical project seemed to be to assemble a broad array plant lists, with lists from each geographic region and across the spectrum of time. The project’s purpose is to bring together in one place a base of information, a data base, if you will, that will allow those interested in old gardens to determine the plants available and popular in the different regions at certain times. This manual is the fruition of a joint undertaking between the Southern Garden History Society and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. In choosing lists to be included, I have been rather ruthless in expecting that the lists be specific to a place and a time.
    [Show full text]
  • TURF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM MMWD LYL Approved Plant List
    LANDSCAPE YOUR LAWN (LYL) TURF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM MMWD LYL Approved Plant List Attached is the current MMWD list of approved plants for the The values are obtained by determining the area of a circle using Landscape Your Lawn (LYL) Program. the plant spread or width as the diameter. To find the area of a circle, square the diameter and multiply by .7854. Squaring the This list is taken from the Water Use Classification of Landscape diameter means multiplying the diameter by itself. For example, a Species (WUCOLS IV) – a widely accepted and commonly used plant with a 5 foot spread would be calculated as follows: source of information on landscape plant water needs. Plants that .7854 x 5 ft diameter x 5 ft diameter = 20 sq ft (values are rounded are listed in WUCOLS IV as “low” or “very low” water use for the Bay to the nearest whole number). Area have been included on this list. However, plants that are considered invasive and are found on the MMWD Invasive Plant List For values not provided, please refer to reputable gardening books are not included in this list and will not be allowed for the LYL or nurseries in order to determine the diameter of the plant at program. maturity, or conduct an internet search using the botanical name and “mature size”. Any plants used in turf conversion that are not on this plant list will not count toward the 50 percent plant coverage requirement nor CA Natives will they be eligible for a rebate under LYL Option 1. Native plants are perfectly suited to our climate, soil, and animals.
    [Show full text]