Brooklyn Family October 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report
Cooperatives & Condominiums Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report Cooperatives & Condominiums Brooklyn BHSID 20845406 Message from Bess Freedman CEO of Brown Harris Stevens Brooklyn apartment prices averaged a record $965,575 in the second quarter, as demand remained incredibly strong. Closings more than doubled compared to a year ago, and were also up 26% from 2021’s first quarter. The number of contracts signed during the second quarter set a new record, so expect the number of closings to rise sharply in 3Q21. I’m also happy to announce we have made two major changes to our Brooklyn quarterly report beginning with this issue. First, instead of reporting on just four major areas, we now have data for 12 neighborhood groupings. This will allow us to present more localized and relevant data to you. Secondly, we are now just reporting on apartments, as townhouses will now have their own semiannual report. BHSID 20873538 BHS 2 Q2 2021 All Brooklyn Brooklyn apartment prices averaged a record $965,575 in the second quarter, which was 10% higher than a year ago. The average condo price per square foot also set a record, crossing the $1,000 mark for All Brooklyn BHSID 20221010 the first time. BHS 3 Q2 2021 All Brooklyn* BHSID 20828157 Cooperatives & Condominiums Average & Median Sales Price $1 ,200 ,0 00 $1,000,000 $965,575 $936,985 $880,729 $874,892 $835,030 $810,000 $792,000 $800,000 $760,000 $700,000 $692,410 $600,000 $400,000 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20 1Q 21 2Q21 Average Price Median Price Cooperative Condominium Average Price Per Room Average Price Per Square Foot $250,000 $1,2 50 $1,008 $200,000 $1,000 $969 $181,808 $162,425 $150,000 $750 $100,000 $500 $50,000 $250 2Q20 2Q21 2Q20 2Q21 * Includes new development and resale apartments. -
A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual. -
Ieg Sponsorship Report Ieg Sponsorship Report the Latest on Sports, Arts, Cause and Entertainment Marketing
IEG SPONSORSHIP REPORT IEG SPONSORSHIP REPORT THE LATEST ON SPORTS, ARTS, CAUSE AND ENTERTAINMENT MARKETING NOVEMBER 12, 2012 WWW.IEGSR.COM WHO DOES WHAT HOTEL CHAINS CHECK INTO NEW SPONSORSHIPS Hotel chains double down on sponsorship to drive new business and engage consumers outside the hotel environment. Rising occupancy rates, the growing popularity of consumer loyalty programs and new hotels in the U.S., Asia, Middle East and other markets are driving a groundswell of new deals around the world, bringing the category back to life after taking a hit a few years ago. Those include Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and the Mercedes AMG Petronas Formula One team; InterContinental Hotels Group and the LPGA, and Marriott International, Inc. and the Barclays Center, home to the NBA Brooklyn Nets. More recently, IHG last month announced a one-year partnership with the East Coast Hockey League, a deal HOTELS BY NUMBER OF DEALS that affords status as the league’s preferred hotel partner across the company’s various hotel chains. Those deals follow a spate of new ties over the past two years. Those include Marriott and the National Football League and IHG and the PGA Tour, Champions Tour and Web.com Tour. IHG in 2010 extended Crowne Plaza Hotels & Resort’s title of the PGA Tour Crowne Plaza Invitational at Colonial through 2015. Below, IEG SR highlights the three primary hot buttons in the hotel category: ©2012 IEG, LLC. All rights reserved. Drive bookings. To no surprise, hotel companies use sponsorship to gain new and incremental business. That includes business from fans and other frequent travelers as well as sports teams and other sponsored properties. -
Manual World of Subways 4
Subway Simulator - New York Queens - Manhattan Line 7 Copyright: © 2015 / Aerosoft GmbH Airport Paderborn/Lippstadt D-33142 Bueren, Germany Tel: +49 (0) 29 55 / 76 03-10 Fax: +49 (0) 29 55 / 76 03- 33 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aerosoft.de www.aerosoft.com All trademarks and brand names are trademarks or registered of their respective owners. All rights reserved. 2 3 Aerosoft GmbH 2015 Subway Simulator New York Queens - Manhattan Line 7 Manual 2 3 Subway Simulator - New York Queens - Manhattan Line 7 Content Epilepsy Warning ..................................................................5 Safety Precautions ................................................................5 Installing the Game ..............................................................6 Quick Start ........................................................................... 7 Tutorials ................................................................................ 9 Difficulty level .................................................................... 11 Scheduled Trip .................................................................... 12 Missions .............................................................................. 15 Introduction ....................................................................... 16 The International Express Route ...................................... 16 History of Line 7 ................................................................ 16 The Tin Birds of A-Division................................................ 17 Main -
Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting March 2021 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 3/17/2021 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 2021 CPOC Committee Minutes - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2021 - 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT President's Report - Page 6 5. CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Progress Report on Infrastructure Projects - Page 11 IEC Project Review on Coney Island Yard Long Term Flood Mitigation - Page 16 IEC Project Review on Clifton Shop (NYCT/SIR) (Sandy) - Page 20 IEC Project Review on Rutgers Tube Rehabilitation - Page 24 IEC Project Review on 207th Street Flood Mitigation & Sewer Replacement - Page 28 IEC Project Review on Bus Radio System - Page 37 IEC Project Review on Harmon Shop Replacement Phase V, Stage 2 - Page 44 6. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 48 7. QUARTERLY TRAFFIC LIGHT REPORTS Fourth Quarter 2020 Core & Sandy Traffic Light Reports - Page 64 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE February 18, 2021 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on February 18, 2021, which included the following committees: Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad; New York City Transit; MTA Bridges and Tunnels; ; Finance Diversity; Capital Program Oversight Committee. -
St. Francis College Terrier Magazine | Fall 2019, Volume 83, Number 1
First Master of Fine Arts Degrees Awarded 2019 SFC Literary Prize Arts at SFC The McGuire Scholars: First Class Graduates President Miguel Martinez-Saenz, Ph.D., and McGuire Scholar Antonia Meditz ’19, the 2019 Spring Commencement THE ST. FRANCIS COLLEGE MAGAZINE | FALL 2019, VOLUME 83, NUMBER 1 TERRIER BOARD OF TRUSTEES ALUMNI BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fall 2019 Volume 83, Number 1 CHAIRMAN PRESIDENT Terrier, the magazine of St. Francis College, Denis Salamone ’75 Robert L. Smith ’72 is published by the Office of Marketing and Communications for alumni and friends of TRUSTEES VICE PRESIDENT St. Francis College. Hector Batista ’84, P’17 Patricia Moffatt Lesser ’77 Bro. William Boslet, OSF ’70 Linda Werbel Dashefsky SECRETARY Rev. Msgr. John J. Bracken Vice President for Kevin T. Conlon ’11 Government and Community Relations Kate Cooney Burke Thomas F. Flood Timothy Cecere P’20 DIRECTORS Vice President for Advancement William Cline Joseph M. Acciarito ’12 Bro. Leonard Conway, OSF ’71 James Bozart ’86 Tearanny Street John J. Casey ’70 Executive Director, Edward N. Constantino ’68 Marketing and Communications Kenneth D. Daly ’88 Salvatore Demma ’09 and ’11 Mary Beth Dawson, Ph.D. Joseph Hemway ’84 EDITOR William F. Dawson, Jr. ’86 Dorothy Henigman-Gurreri ’79 Leah Schmerl Jean S. Desravines ’94 Sarah Bratton Hughes ’07 Director of Integrated Communications, Gene Donnelly ’79 Mary Anne Killeen ’78 Marketing and Communications Catherine Greene Josephine B. Leone ’08 CONTRIBUTORS Leslie S. Jacobson, Ph.D. Alfonso Lopez ’06 Rob DeVita ’15 Penelope Kokkinides James H. McDonald ’69 Kathleen A. Mills ’09 Joey Jarzynka Barbara G. Koster ’76 Jesus F. -
Report Measures the State of Parks in Brooklyn
P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 2 Methodology Page 2 Park Breakdown Page 5 Multiple/No Community District Jurisdictions Page 5 Brooklyn Community District 1 Page 6 Brooklyn Community District 2 Page 12 Brooklyn Community District 3 Page 18 Brooklyn Community District 4 Page 23 Brooklyn Community District 5 Page 26 Brooklyn Community District 6 Page 30 Brooklyn Community District 7 Page 34 Brooklyn Community District 8 Page 36 Brooklyn Community District 9 Page 38 Brooklyn Community District 10 Page 39 Brooklyn Community District 11 Page 42 Brooklyn Community District 12 Page 43 Brooklyn Community District 13 Page 45 Brooklyn Community District 14 Page 49 Brooklyn Community District 15 Page 50 Brooklyn Community District 16 Page 53 Brooklyn Community District 17 Page 57 Brooklyn Community District 18 Page 59 Assessment Outcomes Page 62 Summary Recommendations Page 63 Appendix 1: Survey Questions Page 64 P a g e | 2 Introduction There are 877 parks in Brooklyn, of varying sizes and amenities. This report measures the state of parks in Brooklyn. There are many different kinds of parks — active, passive, and pocket — and this report focuses on active parks that have a mix of amenities and uses. It is important for Brooklynites to have a pleasant park in their neighborhood to enjoy open space, meet their neighbors, play, and relax. While park equity is integral to creating One Brooklyn — a place where all residents can enjoy outdoor recreation and relaxation — fulfilling the vision of community parks first depends on measuring our current state of parks. This report will be used as a tool to guide my parks capital allocations and recommendations to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks), as well as to identify recommendations to improve advocacy for parks at the community and grassroots level in order to improve neighborhoods across the borough. -
Cubic Partners with Dexda to Deliver Next-Generation Event Management for Customers in New York and London
Cubic partners with Dexda to deliver next-generation event management for customers in New York and London. The Dexda solution enables predictive event management for transport authorities managed by Cubic in New York and London. Background The New York City (NYC) subway and bus system is one of the most efficient public transportation systems in the world. Ridership across both is approximately eight million daily and more than 2.5 billion journeys annually. Cubic Transportation Systems (Cubic) has worked with (MTA) for nearly three decades now, starting with the implementation of the entire subway system accepting MetroCard, a magnetic swipe card allowing customers to load fares electronically. Today, more than 90 per cent of trips taken on NYC subways and buses Cubic was selected by the (MTA) to deliver and manage this major project are made with MetroCard. based on the success of Oyster. A similar next-generation fare payment As part of an ongoing modernisation programme, the current swipe system used on the bus, underground and rail services that the company MetroCard is expected to be phased out designed and implemented for Transport for London (TfL). by 2023. It is to be replaced by OMNY, a ‘More than 2.5 billion fare payment system enabling travellers to The new OMNY system allows customers to create personalised transit journeys annually’ pay with mobile and open payments via accounts to see travel history, check balances, add value as well as report lost contactless bankcards and mobile wallets or stolen cards to protect their funds. As a result, customers will experience or MTA-issued contactless smart cards, to greater convenience and shorter lines, allowing them to move faster through improve customer convenience and service for travellers. -
Boclair-Academy-School-Handbook
Boclair Academy School Handbook 2019-2020 January 2019 Dear Parent Welcome to the Boclair Academy handbook for session 2019-2020. Boclair Academy is a six-year comprehensive which serves its catchment area of South Bearsden and the village of Torrance (full details of the delineated catchment area can be accessed from Education Services, Southbank House, 1 Strathkelvin Place, Kirkintilloch). The totality of life in a large secondary school cannot be captured in a book such as this, but it does contain much information which I hope you will find useful. We offer pupils a wide range of educational experiences at Boclair, from the traditional range of subjects to the extensive programme of extra-curricular activities, school trips and visits. We hope that by offering these formal and informal learning experiences all of our pupils will have opportunities to maximise their potential, whatever their aptitudes, interests or aspirations. Session 2010-2011 saw the first steps in the formal introduction of Curriculum for Excellence, and staff have been engaged in ensuring the best possible educational experience is available for new pupils over the last seven years. Every school requires to produce an annual Improvement Plan. For Session 2018-2019 the focus is on improving the experience for all learners both in terms of attainment and achievement. Over the past 5-6 years, we have seen a steady improvement in the examination performance of our pupils, and over the past three sessions we have seen some of the best SQA results in the school’s history. Staff and pupils will be striving to maintain the high standards which have been set. -
Flatbush Rezoning Flatbush Rezoning - Approved! Overview
Projects & Proposals > Brooklyn > Flatbush Rezoning Flatbush Rezoning - Approved! Overview Update July 29, 2009: On July 29, 2009, the City Council adopted the Flatbush Rezoning. The zoning map and text changes are now in effect. The New York City Department of City Planning (DCP), at the request of Community Board 14, elected officials and civic groups, proposes zoning map changes and zoning text amendments for one hundred and eighty blocks located in the Flatbush neighborhood of Community District 14, Brooklyn. The project area, which includes the rezoning area and the area of a proposed zoning text amendment, is bounded by; Caton Avenue, Parkside Avenue and Clarkson Avenue on the north, Bedford Avenue and the Community District 14 boundary to the east, Campus Road and the Long Island Railroad’s Bay Ridge freight line on the south, and Coney Island Avenue on the west. The proposed zoning would primarily match new zoning to the existing built character which includes areas of detached homes, row houses and apartment buildings. Currently, existing zoning does not reflect the built character of lower-density detached and apartment building areas. Under the current R6 zoning, development of tall apartment buildings without height limitation is permitted and has resulted in demolition of existing detached, one- and two-family homes.The new zoning also provides incentives for affordable housing development in the area in addition to strengthening commercial corridors. Map of the Rezoning Area in the Larger Study Area Brooklyn Context View a larger image View a larger image Projects & Proposals > Brooklyn > Flatbush Rezoning Flatbush Rezoning - Approved! Existing Context and Zoning Neighborhood Character The neighborhoods of Flatbush are generally located directly south of Prospect Park, between the major thoroughfares of Coney Island Avenue and Flatbush Avenue, north of Farragut Road, and between Coney Island Avenue and Nostrand Avenue to the south of Farragut Road. -
Market Report Brooklyn
First Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report Brooklyn BHSID 19098184 We’re growing! Halstead has joined Brown Harris Stevens - which means BHS now has 2,500 agents and 55 offices in luxury markets across NYC, the Tristate area, the Hamptons, Palm Beach, and Miami. Historically ranked among the nation’s top residential firms, in 2019 both firms combined closed 6,000 transactions totaling more than $9 billion. Simply put, we have more resources than ever to support our trusted clients. We are here to serve you, and Brown Harris Stevens has never been stronger. We look forward to working together. BHSID 20650302 BHS 1 Message from Bess Freedman CEO of Brown Harris Stevens The Brooklyn residential market remained hot in the first quarter of 2021, with prices for both apartments and townhouses higher than a year ago. Apartment prices averaged $939,368, which was 13% more than 2020’s first quarter. The average 1-3 family house price of $1,289,768 represented a 7% improvement over the past year. Apartment sales continued to surge in 2021’s first quarter, with the number of closings up 20% from a year ago. That’s impressive considering COVID-19 had very little impact on closings in the first quarter of 2020, while it is still impacting our economy today. Contracts signed in the first quarter to buy a Brooklyn apartment hit their highest level in almost four years, a sign that this momentum is only getting stronger. BHSID 20625191 BHS 2 Q1 2021 Cooperatives & Condominiums Both the average and median prices posted strong gains compared to 2020’s first quarter. -
Review of the G Line
Review of the G Line ,. July 10, 2013 NYC Transit G Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the G line. Based on NYC Transit’s standard measures of On-Time Performance and Wait Assessment, the G performs well relative to the average subway line. At the same time, the G differs from other NYC Transit subway lines because the route is relatively short and never enters Manhattan, and thus serves primarily as a feeder/distributor with most riders transferring at least once before reaching their destinations. This review identifies a number of opportunities to improve operations on the G line, with recommendations chiefly intended to provide more even train headways and passenger loading, as well as to improve customer communication. Key Findings: While G ridership has grown significantly in recent years, it still remains relatively low compared to the rest of the system, and average passenger loads on the G are within service guidelines during both peak and off-peak hours. Scheduling the G train around the busier and more frequent F train causes uneven headways and passenger loads on the G, most significantly during the afternoon peak period, when G service is scheduled at the minimum guideline frequency of 6 trains per hour (an average 10-minute headway). G riders make twice as many transfers as the average subway rider; this high transfer rate is inconvenient for customers who must wait for multiple trains. Trains shorter than the platform length cause uncertainty about where the G train stops, contributing to uneven passenger loads.