High Temperature Sensitivity Is Intrinsic to Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 2 High Temperature Sensitivity Is Intrinsic to Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels 3 4 Fan Yang and Jie Zheng¶ 5 Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 6 95616 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ¶To whom correspondence should be addressed: 14 Jie Zheng 15 Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology 16 University of California at Davis School of Medicine 17 One Shields Ave 18 Davis, CA 95616 19 USA 20 Tel. 530-752-1241 21 FAX 530-752-5423 22 [email protected] 23 24 Keywords: TRP channels | potassium channels | temperature sensing | gating | 25 conformational changes | allosteric coupling 1 26 Abstract 27 Temperature-sensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels are members of the 28 large tetrameric cation channels superfamily but are considered to be uniquely sensitive 29 to heat, which has been presumed to be due to the existence of an unidentified 30 temperature-sensing domain. Here we report that the homologous voltage-gated 31 potassium (Kv) channels also exhibit high temperature sensitivity comparable to that of 32 TRPV1, which is detectable under specific conditions when the voltage sensor is 33 functionally decoupled from the activation gate through either intrinsic mechanisms or 34 mutations. Interestingly, mutations could tune Shaker channel to be either heat-activated 35 or heat-deactivated. Therefore, high temperature sensitivity is intrinsic to both TRP and 36 Kv channels. Our findings suggest important physiological roles of heat-induced 37 variation in Kv channel activities. Mechanistically our findings indicate that 38 temperature-sensing TRP channels may not contain a specialized heat-sensor domain; 39 instead, non-obligatory allosteric gating permits the intrinsic heat sensitivity to drive 40 channel activation, allowing temperature-sensitive TRP channels to function as 41 polymodal nociceptors. 42 2 43 Introduction 44 Sensitive detection and discrimination of temperature cues are fundamental to the 45 survival and prosperity of humans and animals. While Hodgkin and Huxley showed 46 more than sixty years ago that temperature could profoundly influence membrane 47 excitability (1), it is in general not well understood how heat affects membrane 48 excitability and how temperature-dependent changes in neuronal activity contribute to 49 physiology. Neuronal action potentials are generated and modulated by a precise 50 combination of ionic currents produced by the activity of ion channels. Activation of ion 51 channels in turn is the result of complex conformational rearrangements in channel 52 protein controlled by specific physical or chemical stimuli (2). Heat contributes to 53 activation energy for channel conformational changes, through which it regulates channel 54 activity and the shape of action potential (3, 4). For most ion channels, thermal energy 55 affects the rate of conformational transitions by 2-to-5 folds per 10 °C (4, 5). Within the 56 physiological temperature range, thermal energy alone was found to be generally 57 insufficient to initiate channel activation. Among the exceptions are a group of transient 58 receptor potential (TRP) channels including TRPV1-4, TRPM8, TRPM3, TRPM4, 59 TRPM5, TRPC5, and TRPA1. These channels are potently activated by heat in the 60 absence of another stimulus and hence serve as key cellular temperature sensors (6, 7). 61 How these TRP channels respond to heat with exquisite sensitivity, however, remains 62 mysterious. 63 64 To understand the molecular mechanism underlying high temperature sensitivity of the 65 TRP channels, we conducted a comparative investigation of the voltage-gated potassium 3 66 (Kv) channels. As members of the tetrameric cation channel superfamily, TRP channels 67 and Kv channels are structurally similar. They all have six transmembrane segments, 68 with the S1 to S4 segments forming an isolated peripheral domain surrounding the ion- 69 permeating pore composed of S5, S6, and the loop between them. Comparison of the 70 crystal structures of Kv channels (8, 9) and the cryo-EM structures of TRPV1 (10, 11) 71 further shows that detailed structural features of these two types of channels are also very 72 similar. However, the two types of channels are functionally distinct. Kv channels are 73 activated by membrane depolarization with a steep voltage dependence (12), while TRP 74 channels are only weakly activated at highly depolarized voltages (7). More importantly, 75 unlike the temperature-sensitive TRP channels, Kv channels cannot be directly activated 76 by changes in temperature, and the activity of Kv channels are generally considered to be 77 not very heat-sensitive (4, 13). The differences lead to the widely accepted assumption 78 that through evolution some TRP channels have acquired specific protein structures that 79 serve as a “heat sensor”. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by examining the 80 temperature response of Kv channels. 81 82 Results 83 TRPV1 is an archetypical temperature-sensitive TRP channel (14). Heat strongly 84 activates the channel, which could be observed at a broad voltage range using a ramp 85 protocol (Fig. 1A, upper panel). A common way to characterize temperature sensitivity 86 is the Q10 value (defined as the folds increase in current amplitude upon a 10 °C increase 87 in temperature). For TRPV1, the Q10 value is above 20 over a more than 200 mV voltage 88 range (Fig. 1A, lower panel) (15), reflecting outstanding sensitivity of channel activation 4 89 to heat. Having high temperature sensitivity at a wide voltage range is crucial for the 90 channel’s physiological role as a temperature sensor—it allows TRPV1-expressing 91 sensory neurons to detect heat no matter the neurons are in the resting state or excited 92 state. 93 94 Activity of Shaker potassium channel, in contrast, exhibited much lower temperature 95 sensitivity (Fig. 1B, upper panel). As a voltage-gated channel, Shaker activates upon 96 depolarization to about -60 mV (Fig. 1C). The threshold voltage for activation was only 97 slightly shifted by raising temperature. The average Q10 value remained low, at below 4 98 (Fig. 1B, lower panel). Low temperature sensitivity is anticipated for Shaker and many 99 other Kv channels, because opening and closing of the ion permeation pore in these 100 channels is obligatorily coupled to movement of the voltage-sensor controlled by the 101 membrane potential (12). At hyperpolarized voltages, the channel is locked in the initial 102 closed state (C, Fig. 1B), in which the voltage-sensor is kept in the down conformation. 103 A strongly voltage-dependent transition, involving the movement of ~13 e0 gating 104 charges across the transmembrane electric field (16-18), moves the channel to another 105 closed state, C’, from which it can transition to the open state, O, with little voltage 106 dependence. Since thermal energy is insufficient to supply the activation energy for 107 voltage-sensor to overcome transmembrane voltage, opening of the channel is dictated by 108 the membrane potential. The high fidelity of Shaker and other voltage-gated channels in 109 reporting changes in membrane potential at variable environmental conditions is the basis 110 for reliable electrical signaling of the nervous system. 111 5 112 A closer inspection of the Shaker channel Q10 measurement, however, revealed that it did 113 increase modestly around -80 to -60 mV (arrow in Fig. 1B, lower panel), approaching 10 114 at its peak. It is intriguing that this is the voltage range at which the voltage-sensor starts 115 to move, permitting the CC’ transition. This can be seen in the voltage dependence of 116 gating charge movement (Q-V curve, Fig. 1C). Since it has been previously suggested 117 that the voltage-dependent transition in TRPV1 is highly temperature-sensitive (19), we 118 wondered whether the transient Q10 increase in Shaker might reflect temperature 119 sensitivity of the voltage-sensor movement. To test this possibility, we conducted similar 120 measurements with the voltage-gated Ca2+-modulated BK potassium channel, because for 121 this channel the separation between the G-V curve and the Q-V curve can be 122 conveniently controlled by intracellular Ca2+. 123 124 We observed that, like Shaker, BK in the presence of intracellular Ca2+ also exhibited a 125 transient Q10 increase at the voltage range where voltage-sensor started to be activated by 126 depolarization, around -80 mV (Fig. 2A). Removing Ca2+ shifts the voltage range for 127 channel activation, substantially increasing the separation between G-V and Q-V curves 128 (20). The change is achieved mainly through a dual-allosteric coupling between the 129 C’O transition and the Ca2+ and voltage induced transitions (20). We observed two 2+ 130 interesting effects of Ca removal on the transient Q10 increase. First, it substantially 131 shifted the voltage range at which the transient Q10 increase occurred, to around +100 mV 132 (Fig. 2B). This large shift mirrored the substantial shift of the G-V curve. More 2+ 133 importantly, in the absence of Ca the extent of the Q10 increase was enhanced 134 dramatically even though the total gating charge movement remained unchanged (20) 6 135 (Fig. 2B). These observations suggest that the Q10 increase may not be associated with 136 the voltage-sensor movement (as reflected by the Q-V curve) but rather associated with 137 the activation gate opening (as reflected by the G-V curve), that is, instead of the CC’ 138 transition, it seemed to be the C’O transition that yielded the Q10 increase. 139 140 The possibility of a voltage-sensor associated Q10 increase was further ruled out when we 141 tested additional Kv channels. We found that both Kv2.1 and Kv4.3 exhibited a 142 surprisingly prominent Q10 transient increase that peaked in the 20-to-30 range (Fig. 3), a 143 level comparable to that of TRPV1.