DOCSLIB.ORG

Rapid Reads This Short Ebook Is Part of the “Rapid Reads” Series on the German Army of World War II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rapid Reads This Short Ebook Is Part of the “Rapid Reads” Series on the German Army of World War II Cover Rapid Reads This short ebook is part of the “Rapid Reads” series on the German Army of World War II. This series, when complete, will offer a comprehensive overview of this absorbing topic, covering the key campaigns, tactics, commanders and equipment of the World War II Wehrmacht. We hope you enjoy this Rapid Read and that you will recommend the series to friends and colleagues. You should be able to read one of these handy eBooks in less than an hour. They’re designed for busy people on the go. If you would like to place a review on our website, or with the retailer you purchased it from, please do so. All feedback, positive or negative, is appreciated. All these Rapid Reads plus supplemental materials and ebooks on other military topics are available on our website, www.germanwarmachine.com Technical Specifications (Panther Ausf. A) General Armament Length: 6.87m (22ft 6in), 8.66m Main gun: Kwk 42 L/70, semi-automatic (28ft 5in) including gun barrel Cartridge: 75mm (2.95in) by 640mm Width: 3.27m (10ft 9in), 3.42m (25.19in) (11ft 3in) with Schürzen side-skirts Barrel length: 5.250m (17ft 3in) Height: 3m (9ft 10in) Rate of fire: 3–5 rounds per minute Weight: 45.5 tonnes (50 tons) Ammunition storage: 40 rounds Crew: 5 (Driver, radio operator, gunner, Panzergranate 39/42 (armor piercing) loader, commander) 39 rounds Sprenggranaten 42 (high explosive) Powerplant Armor penetration: 124mm (4.9in) Engine: Maybach HL 230 P30 V-12 at 500m (550 yd), 111mm (4.4in) at (23-litre, 700hp) 1000m (1100yd), 99mm (3.9in) at Fuel: Regular automobile-grade gasoline 1500m (1600yd) Fuel consumption (Road): 2.8 liters per Secondary weapons: Two 7.62mm kilometer (1.2 gallons per mile) MG34 Panzerlauf (‘tank mounting’) Fuel consumption (cross-country): machine guns. One in the lower hull, 7.3 liters per kilometer (2.6 gallons per one mounted alongside the main gun. mile) Transmission: ZF AK 7-200 Armor synchromesh manual. (Angles from horizontal) Top speed: 55km/h (34mph), 46km/h Hull front: 80mm at 35° (upper (28mph) with engine limited to section) 60mm at -35° (lower section) 2500rpm (a common field modification) Hull sides: 40mm at 40° (upper Track width: 660mm (26in) section) 40mm at 90° (lower section) Hull rear: 40mm at 60° Hull roof: 16mm at 0° Turret front: 100mm on curved plate Turret back and sides: 45 mm at 65° Turret roof: 16mm at 5° A group of Panzergrenadiers accompany a Panther (either an early- production Ausf. G or a late-production Ausf. A) through a cornfield during the summer of 1944. The relatively relaxed attitude of the infantry, coupled with the fact that the tank’s turret cupola and rear hatch are open, suggests that this picture was taken some distance from the frontline. The significance of the tank’s turret number – IN3 – is not known. Many Panzer regiments used their own arbitrary numbering systems towards the end of the war in an attempt to mask the identity of their command tanks. Germany’s Flawed Masterpiece The Panzerkampfwagen V “Panther” was one of the deadliest tanks of World War II. It was fast, heavily armored, and armed with the powerful kwk 42 75mm gun. These strengths were offset, however, by a number of crippling mechanical problems – the consequence of a long and troubled development period – that prevented it from becoming the war-winning weapon Hitler had hoped for. 5 he best place to begin the story of the Panther tank is in the Russian town of Mtsensk, some 280km (170 Tmiles) southwest of Moscow. Here the old Orel-Tula highway and the Kursk-Moscow Railway run side by side across deep ravine cut by the Zhusha River. On 4 October 1941, with General Heinz Guderian’s Second Panzer Army closing on the town from the southwest, Mtsensk was occupied by a Red Army reserve formation under the command of Major- General Dmitry Lelyushenko. This task force included the 1st Guards Rifle Corps, elements of the 5th Airborne Corps, and the newly formed 4th Tank Brigade. Although these units were fresh from training, most were well equipped and led by competent officers. Of particular note was Colonel Mikhail Katukov, commander of the 4th Tank Brigade. He was one of the Red Army’s most experienced tankers, having served in merchanized units since 1932, and would go on to have an illustrious career as commander of the 1st Guards Tank Army. Major-General Lelyushenko decided to set up an ambush on the outskirts of the town, where the Orel-Tula highway passed through a shallow depression alongside a large patch of woodland. The infantry was ordered to dig in across the road, establishing a blocking position with machine guns and light anti-tank weapons, while the T-34s and KV-1s of the 4th Tank Brigade moved into concealed positions on the edge of the woods. On the afternoon of 6 October the lead companies of the 4th Panzer Division came up the road, hoping to sieze the bridges over the Zhusha before nightfall. Operating without a proper reconnaissance screen, they blundered straight into Lelyushenko’s ambush. At 17:30 hours, as the German tanks moved up to engage the dug-in infantry, a group of four T-34s 6 and three KV-1s under the command of Lieutenant Dmitry Lavrinienko (later to become a high scoring tank-ace) opened fire from the woods on their left flank. The Panzer IIIs and IVs returned fire, but were unable to make an impression on the heavier Soviet vehicles. Soon more T-34s were streaming out from the woods to join the fray and artillery was raining down on the German column. In the ensuing battle at least ten German tanks were knocked out (Soviet accounts put the number closer to 50) and their supporting infantry forced to retreat with heavy losses. News of this clash shocked Heinz Guderian, who later described it as “the first occasion on which the vast superiority of the Russian T-34 to our tanks became plainly apparent”. He was forced to halt his advance on Tula for several days while the battered and shaken men of the 4th Panzer Division were reorganized. Lelyushenko’s men held out in Mtsensk until 27 October, critically delaying the southern pincer of the German advance on Moscow. Guderian demanded that a special commission be set up to assess the threat posed by the T-34 and come up with a specification for a vehicle that could counter it. It was this specification that was to become the Panzerkampfwagen V “Panther”. German Complacency Despite frequent assertions to the contrary, this was not the first encounter between T-34s and Panzers, nor was the T-34 a rare sight before this time (more than 1000 T-34s had been deployed to frontline units in the months before Barbarossa). The Germans had been aware of the new Soviet tank since the spring of 1941, and almost certainly had several working 7 examples in their inventory, captured during the mass encirclements of July and August. What they didn’t have was any apparent reason to worry about them. The early encounters with T-34s were stilted affairs where the Soviet tank crews were usually operating without effective command, infantry support, or proper training. These encounters gave the Germans a misleading impression of the tank’s capabilities and the complacency that the Wehrmacht developed in the aftermath of its initial victories meant there was no interest in examining the captured T-34s any more closely. Though the T-34 was undoubtedly superior to anything the Germans could deploy at the time, the position that the 4th Panzer Division had allowed itself to be lured into at Mtsensk would have been dangerous regardless of the Soviet tanks used. Guderian’s demand for new equipment was valid, but his vociferous tone was probably driven at least in part by a desire to play down his own mistakes. In his letters back to Germany Guderian perhaps overstated the shortfall between German and Soviet tanks, setting an ambitious set of minimum requirements that included “superior tactical mobility”, “improved armor protection”, and “heavier armament”. He also demanded – repeatedly – that this new tank be brought into action as soon as possible. Guderian’s unreasonable expectations for the tank that would become the Panther put the development process on a bad footing from the outset. Specification VK 20 The German Armaments Ministry – known as the Heereswaffenamt or HWA – had been working on designs for a better medium tank since long before Operation Barbarossa. 8 In 1938, while the Panzer IV was still only being produced in small experimental batches, the HWA published specification VK 20, which solicited designs for a new heavier medium tank to eventually replace the Panzer III and IV. The name of this specification was a reference to the intended weight of the vehicle – 20 tonnes compared to the 16 tonnes of the Panzer IV. Proposals were submitted by Krupp, Daimler-Benz, and MAN (Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg). VK 20 was seen as a long-term project and the three contractors involved were not expected to reach even the prototype stage for several more years. The overwhelming success of the German Blitzkrieg in Poland and France in 1939 and 1940, respectively, caused VK 20 to be sidelined even further. Neither Poland, France, nor Britain could field a medium tank that was as effective as the Panzer III or IV, causing many in the Wehrmacht high command to question whether or not the VK 20 program was really necessary. Instead, they pushed for a series of upgrades to be made to the III and IV in tandem with the development of a new heavy tank that could counter slow-moving armored monsters like the British Matilda II.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Skin of Peter "Hoagy" Carmichael's Hawker Sea Fury, the Legendary One That Shot Down a Mig-15 Over Korea
    1 [REGISTER] [ACE OF THE MONTH] Lt JG Tetsuzo Iwamoto………………………………………………………. 2 #A6M2 Mod 21, Petty Officer First Class Tetsuzo Iwamoto, Zuikaku Carrier Air Group, Pearl Harbor Attack, 7th December 1941. Camouflage created by max_86z [AIR FORCES] Israeli Air Force………………………………………………………………………………. 6 'P-51D-5 of the Israeli Air Force, 1956' skin by _TerremotO_ [EVENT] Landing in Normandy……………………………………………………………………………. 10 D-Day wallpaper [VEHICLE PROFILE] TBF-1c / Avenger Mk 1………………………………………………………….. 12 A TBF-1C of the VC-8. Camouflage with custom damage textures created by Hueynam1234 [VEHICLE PROFILE] M46 Patton…………………………………………………………………………… 16 M46 Patton 64th Tank Bat. [Han River 1951] camouflage created by Tiger_VI [EVENT] Battles over Malta………………………………………………………………………………… 19 Malta Siege wallpaper [NATIONAL FORCES] 653rd Heavy Panzerjäger Battalion……………………………………. 21 Jagdtiger 653rd Heavy Panzerjäger Battalion *Germany 1945+, camouflage created by Tiger_VI [AIR FORCES] Mexican Expeditionary Air Forces…………………………………………………. 24 P-47 wallpaper in Mexican Air Forces camouflage; Republic P-47D-28 from Escuadrón 201, camouflage created by RiderR2 [VEHICLE PROFILE] Hawker Sea Fury……………………………………………………….. 27 Sea Fury wallpaper; Historical skin of Peter "Hoagy" Carmichael's Hawker Sea Fury, the legendary one that shot down a MiG-15 over Korea. Camouflage created by printf8via [HISTORICAL] Guns of the Air, the RCMs and HMGs………………………………… 31 [VEHICLE PROFILE] PzKpfw KV-1B 756(r)…………………………………………………. 35 KV-1B wallpaper [NATIONAL FORCES] The Irish Air Corps……………………………………………………………… 39 No.1 Fighter Squadron, Irish Army Air Corps at Baldonnel, Ireland, by CmdNomad [EVENT] Blue on Blue…………………………………………………………………………………………. 42 US light tanks wallpaper 1 #A6M2 Mod 21, Petty Officer First Class Tetsuzo Iwamoto, Zuikaku Carrier Air Group, Pearl Harbor Attack, 7th December 1941. Camouflage created by max_86z [ACE OF THE MONTH] Lt JG Tetsuzo Iwamoto 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • PANZER BRIGADES on the EASTERN FRONT by Phil Yates
    By Phil Yates UPDATED ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2014 1 PANZER BRIGADES ON THE EASTERN FRONT Y HIL ATES B P Y After the destruction of Army Group Centre in Byelorussia by the Soviet Operation Bagration, there was little left to stop them short of the German border, 600 kilometres to the west. Hitler ordered twelve new panzer brigades created to ‘surprise and destroy the attacking armoured spearheads’. The first four of these entered combat on the Eastern Front in late August 1944, launching immediate counterattacks against the Red Army’s deepest thrusts. When the Red Army launched its counteroffensive after the The first four were to be ready in just over one month. Bearing Battle of Kursk in August 1943, the German Army had little in mind that a panzer division was usually given six months to stop it. The much vaunted panzer divisions had worn to rebuild after being mauled at the front, the timetable for themselves out attacking the Soviet defences around Kursk, creating whole new units was incredibly short. The Army had leaving the new Panther and Tiger battalions being rushed to suggested rushing refitting panzer divisions back to the front, the front as the only significant armoured forces. A number but Hitler had insisted on forming new units instead. of Kampfgruppen, ad hoc battlegroups, were formed around The first of these was 101. Panzerbrigade under the command these battalions and the remains of various panzer divisions of the highly decorated Generalmajor Hyacinth Graf von under the command of experienced panzer leaders. Wherever Strachwitz und Camminetz (Major-general Hyacinth Count they were employed these powerful battlegroups halted and of Strachwitz and Camminetz), known as the Panzergraf or threw back the Red Army’s thrusts.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2018 Contents Autumn 2018 Titles July 2 August 5 September 8 October 11 November 13 December 14 January 16
    THE MEDIEVAL KNIGHT THE NOBLE WARRIORS OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF CHIVALRY AUTHOR NAME Amber Books Ltd United House North Road London N7 9DP United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7520 7600 [email protected] www.amberbooks.co.uk www.facebook.com/amberbooks twitter: @amberbooks pinterest: amberbooksltd instagram: amberbooksltd BOOKSAutumn 2018 Contents Autumn 2018 Titles July 2 August 5 September 8 October 11 November 13 December 14 January 16 eBooks Many of our titles are also available as eBooks from major online stores. For details and links, please visit www.amberbooks.co.uk/ebooks JULY 2018 PUBLICATION Dark History of Russia MICHAEL KERRIGAN Native American Myths & Legends In the past 100 years alone, Russia has seen immense revolutions: CHRIS MCNAB from monarchy to the world’s first Native American culture is founded socialist state, from Communism to Dark History of Russia on stories told orally and handed Capitalism, from mass poverty to 244 x 186mm (9¾ x 7½”) down through the generations, Europe’s new super rich. In that time, Extent: 224pp Native American Myths & including myths that reveal the origin it has endured civil war, world war Word count: 58,000 words Legends Illustrations: 180 col & b/w photos of a tribe, legends that chronicle and the Cold War, as well as famines, 244 x 186mm (9¾ x 7½”) & a/ws heroes who fought gods, yarns that assassinations and massacres. tell of malevolent trickster spirits, Extent: 224pp ISBN: 978-1-78274-631-7 Word count: 50,000 words Ranging from medieval Kievan Rus and canny morality tales for the £19.99 Hardback Illustrations: 180 b/w and colour to Vladimir Putin, Dark History of ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The T-34-85 in Detail
    ASSEMBLY GUIDE STEP 1 THE T-34-85 IN DETAIL The three-man turret on the T-34-85 was one of several significant innovations that greatly enhanced its combat effectiveness in comparison with its earlier versions. Here is a view of the turret seen from above, and this is the part with which you start when you come to assemble the model. he turret roofs on the T-34-85 varied depending on scope. The most important diference between the turret the factory at which they were manufactured. Its designs was the location of the commander’s cupola. T turret armor thickness was 20 mm, as compared to In 1944, cupola production was increased, and the early 16 mm, on, for example, the German “Panther” tank. versions were given a small ledge on the left side of the All T-34-85 roofs had two covers above the ventilators. At turret intended for this cupola. The turret roof took the the end of 1945, one of the ventilators was placed in front form of an armored plate that rotated on a ball bushing. of the loader’s hatch. There were two diferent periscope It comprised two parts, one of which was hinged and able designs: some T-34-85s had a high PTK-5 periscope from to open. On the early version of the T-34, both parts of this 1943, but the majority were equipped with a low MK-4 peri- hatch could be opened. In 1944 this Т-34-85 was equipped with a commander’s cupola, for which a ledge was provided on the side of the turret.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama
    The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherman Relicsv3
    The War Correspondent Above: A British Sherman tank pictured in camouflage colours and marking of a vehicle that served in North western Europe in 1944/45 The US M4 Sherman tank is arguably the most impor- Some 7,155 of these vehicles were supplied to the tant tank that served with the Allied forces during the British Army. The supply of tanks from the United Second World War. Without it, in the numbers that States had been initiated in July 1940. Recognising were available and thanks to the huge industrial man- that Great Britain did not have the manufacturing ufacturing capacity of the United States, it was possi- capacity to provide the huge amount of war materi- ble to prosecute a successful war against the Axis al that would be needed to prosecute the war powers. Over 40,000 of these tanks were built with a against the Germans and Italians, a British Purchas- number of variants being introduced, as well the basic ing Board was set-up early in the war. This organisa- chassis being modified for many specialist roles. The tion developed into the British Purchasing Sherman served in large numbers not only with the US Commission and in July 1940 a specific Tank Mission Army but also in armoured units of the Allies. In British arrived in the USA to look at the supply of tanks for service, various types were adopted as they became Britain. The US authorities were resistant to building available. The most numerous variant in British service British designs as that recognised that it was very like- was the Sherman V (US designation M4A4).A total of ly that the USA would soon be embroiled in the war 7,499 M4A4 tanks were produced, built solely at the and its manufacturing capacity needed to be United States government owned Detroit Arsenal in geared up to building tanks for the US army, rather Michigan, run by the Chrysler Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogos Modelismo Enero 2021.Xlsx
    AEROBONUS 350001 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #1 (Standing, Arms Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350002 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Crew #1 (Sitting, Arms Up) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350003 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Crew #2 (Sitting, Arms Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350004 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #2 (Bending) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350005 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor w/Rope Bs150 AEROBONUS 350006 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #3 (Posed as Climbing Ladder) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350007 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #4 (Sitting, Arms Down) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350008 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #5 (One Knee Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350009 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #6 (Standing, Arms at Side) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350010 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Officer w/Binoculars Bs150 AEROBONUS 350011 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Ceremony Officer #1 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350012 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Ceremony Officer #2 (Saluting) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350013 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #1 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350014 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #2 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350015 1/35 WWII Geramn Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #3 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350016 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #4 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350017 1/35 WWII Geramn Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #4 Bs150 ACADEMY 12115 1/35 AH60L DAP Black Hawk Helicopter Bs865 ACADEMY
    [Show full text]
  • TEED!* * Find It Lower? We Will Match It
    Spring 2018 BRINGING HISTORY TO LIFE Kits & Accessories NEW! USS HAWAII CB-3 PG.45 PANTHER See page 3 Books & Magazines for details on this exciting new kit. NEW! PANTHER TANK IN ACTION PG. 3 Tools & Paint EVERYTHING YOU NEED FOR MODELMAKING PGS. 58-61 Model Displays OVER 75 NEW KITS, BOOKS MARSTON MAT pg. 24 LOWEST PRICE GUARANTEED!* & ACCESSORIES INSIDE! * * See back cover for full details. Order Today at WWW.SQUADRON.COM or call 1-877-414-0434 Dear Friends, Now that we’ve launched into daylight savings time, I have cleared off my workbench to start several new projects with the additional evening light. I feel really motivated at this moment and with all the great new products we have loaded into this catalog, I think it is going to be a productive spring. As the seasons change, now is the perfect time to start something new; especially for those who have been considering giving the hobby a try, but haven’t mustered the energy to give it a shot. For this reason, be sure to check out pp. 34 - our new feature page especially for people wanting to give the hobby a try. With products for all ages, a great first experience is a sure thing! The big news on the new kit front is the Panther Tank. In conjunction with the new Takom (pp. 3 & 27) kits, Squadron Signal Publications has introduced a great book about this fascinating piece of German armor (SS12059 - pp. 3). Author David Doyle guides you through the incredible history of the WWII German Panzerkampfwagen V Panther.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Battle Tanks
    MODERN! BATTLE k r * m^&-:fl 'tWBH^s £%5»-^ a $ Oft > . — n*- ^*M. S»S Ll^MfiB bjfitai 'Si^. ~i • ^-^HflH Lf. O Q MODERN BATTLE TANKS Edited by Duncan Crow Published by ARCO PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. New York Published 1978 by Arco Publishing Company, Inc. 219 Park Avenue South, New York, N.Y. 10003 Copyright © 1978 PROFILE PUBLICATIONS LIMITED. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data MODERN BATTLE TANKS 1. Tanks (Military science) I. Crow, Duncan. UG446.5.M55 358'. 18 78-4192 ISBN 0-668-04650-3 pbk All rights reserved Printed in Spain by Heraclio Fournier, S.A. Vitoria Spain Contents PAGE Introduction by Duncan Crow Centurion VI Swiss Pz61 and Pz68 VII Vickers Battle Tank VII Japanese Type 61 and STB VIII Soviet Mediums T44, T54, T55 and T62 by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment T44 2 T54 3 Water Crossing 9 Fighting at Night 10 T55 and T62 ... 12 Variants 12 Tactical Doctrine 15 The M48-M60 Series of Main Battle Tanks by Col Robert J. Icks, AUS (Retired) In Battle 19 M48 Development 22 M48 Description 24 Hybrids 26 The M60 32 The Shillelagh 32 The M60 Series 38 Chieftain and Leopard Main Battle Tanks by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment Development Histories 41 Chieftain (FV4201) 41 Leopard Standard Panzer 52 Chieftain and Leopard Described 60 Later Developments by Duncan Crow ... 78 . S-Tank by R. M. Ogorkiewicz Origins of the Design 79 Preliminary Investigations 80 Component Development 81 Suspension and Steering 83 Armament System 87 Engine Installation 88 Probability of Survival 90 Pre-Production Vehicles 90 Production Model 96 Tactical performance .
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Tank Development During the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected]
    Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Undergraduate Theses Spring 2019 Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses Part of the History Commons CU Commons Citation Paugh, Jeremy, "Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War" (2019). Undergraduate Theses. 185. https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses/185 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HST 493- Steel Monsters: Soviet Armor Development During World War 2 A senior thesis submitted to The Department of History College of Arts & Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in History By: Jeremy Paugh Faculty Supervisor ______________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Joel Davis Date Department Chair _______________________________________________ _____________ Kimberly Knutsen Date Dean, College of Arts & Sciences ________________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Michael Thomas Date Provost _______________________________________________________ _____________ Michelle Cowing Date Concordia University Portland, Oregon May, 2018 1 Abstract: This thesis aims to explore the far-reaching effects of armored warfare and tank
    [Show full text]