International Journal of Innovative Social Science & Humanities Research ISSN: 2349-1876 (Print) | ISSN : 2454-1826 (Online)

THE RISE OF UNDER (with special reference to his marital alliances)

Dr. Preeti Prabhat, Assistant Professor, Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Government PG College, Lucknow

ABSTRACT

Among the sixteen mahajanpadas and ten of the sixth century B.C, the kingdom of Magadha under the leadership of Bimbisara gave an important place to the establishment of matrimonial alliances in their foreign policy. Due to this Magadha emerged as the most powerful kingdom of northern . Marital relations had an important role in shaping the politics of sixth century B.C.

Key Words: Dominion, Aggrandizement, Diplomatic, Expansionist, Strategic, Enmity.

Among the sodasa mahajanpadas of pre Buddhist aggrandizement which only ended when age, the kingdom of Magadha emerged as the most sheathed his sword after the conquest of kalinga”.7 powerful one.1 The kingdom of Magadha roughly The Mahavagga informs that Bimbisara’s corresponds to and Gaya districts of .2 dominion embraced 80,000 townships8 and its The ascendancy of Magadhan kingdom commenced capital was Rajagraha or Girivraja.9 In the policies of with the rise of there. Bimbisara Bimbisara matrimonial alliances occupied a was the first important ruler of Haryanka dynasty.3 prominent place. The Mahavagga informs that he He sat on the throne of Magadha in c.545-44 B.C.4 had about five hundred queens.10 Probably the Bibisara has a clear perception of the political number mentioned in Mahavagga may not be situation of his times. He by his diplomatic policies exactly true but he had several queens, some of and military achievements raised the small them are known from literary sources also. The Magadhan principality to a big empire. Jatakas inform of his queen Kosaladevi, the daughter Bimbisara maintained friendly relations of Mahakoshala and sister of king Prasenjit of with his contemporaries. When king of Koshala.11 According to Jain sources, Bimbisara’s was suffering from jaundice, Bimbisara had second queen was Chellana, the daughter of sent his royal physician Jivaka to cure him.5 The Lichchhavi chief .12 His third wife was king Pukkusati was also his friend and had Vaidehi Vasavi13 and his fourth wife was , the sent an envoy to the Magadhan court.6 H.C daughter of King of Madradesa.14 Raychaudhuri has remarked on his achievement that The Jain text Antagadadasao15 mentions his “by war and policy Bimbisara added and a part following 23 queens- Nanda, Nanda Mai, of Kasi to the Magadhan dominions and launched Nanduttara, Nandi Seniya, Maruya, Sumaruya, Magadha to that career of conquest and Mahamaru, Marudeva, Bhadda, Subhadda, Sujaya,

Vol (8), No.1 Jan-Mar, 2021 IJISSHR 1

International Journal of Innovative Social Science & Humanities Research ISSN: 2349-1876 (Print) | ISSN : 2454-1826 (Online)

Sumana, Muyadinna, Kali, Sukali, Mahakali, Kanha, peace was ratified between them and this Mahakanha, Sukanha, Vira-Kanha, Ram-Kanha, matrimonial alliance was contracted in which Piyusenakanha and Mahasena-Kanha…. The other Bimbisara had an upper hand.22 This marital relation literary texts also inform about the following wives proved very fruitful for Bimbisara as it not only of Bimbisara—Apatgandha, Vasumitra, Abhayamati, safeguarded the northern boundary of the Nanda, Dhavasri, Dharini, Utumbarika.16 The above Magadhan Kingdom, but also enabled him to secure information from literary sources prove that a powerful ally in his neighbourhood. This marital Bimbisara had several queens. Some of them played alliance was economically and militarily motivated, a very important role in enhancing his political as the Vinayapitaka informs that the Lichchhavis position as they were made with powerful attacked the Magadhan capital at night23 but after contemporary kingdoms. According to H.C this alliance these attacks ended. This marriage also Raychaudhuri “He pursued a policy of dynastic contributed to the economic prosperity of Magadha, marriages like Hapsburgs and Bourbons of the as the capital of the Lichchhavis was a Europe and contracted matrimonial alliances with commercial city because river formed its the ruling families of Madra, and Vaisali”.17 southern boundary, which was used as a trade route in commercial transportations. Due to this According to Buddhist Jatakas, Bimbisara by advantage, Vaisali, to a great extent, controlled he marrying Kosaladevi entered into matrimonial marine and commercial activities of eastern India.24 relations with the kosalans, which greatly After having relations with Lichchhavis, Bimbisara augmented the financial resources of Magadhan would have taken advantage of this trade route, kingdom, as Kosaladevi brought with her a village of which would have added to the economic prosperity Kashi, producing revenue of one lakh gold coins for of his empire. her bath and perfume money.18 This marital alliance also provided security to the Magadhan kingdom, as Bimbisara’s queen Chellana had a deep Kosala proved to be a buffer state between influence on his personality and religion. Chellana Magadha and . Magadha could have easily was a staunch follower of as her father’s fallen prey to the expansionist policy of its sister was Mahavira’s mother. So Mahavira Swami neighbouring kingdoms, so Bimbisara would have was his cousin brother in relation.25 Under her thought it politic to enter into marital relations with influence, Bimbisara drew closer to Mahavira Swami. the kosalans. The geographical position of Kosala The Uttaradhyana informs that the ‘lion of the was such that it could be quite beneficial in the form kings’ visited the other ‘lion of homeless ascetics’, of a friend, and a destroyer in the form of an enemy. Mahavira along with his wives, servants and The two powerful neighbours ruled for a long period relations and became a staunch believer in the without drawing swords against each other. law’.26 Hemachandra had also mentioned that Bimbisara’s marital relations with the Kosalans “when the country was under the blight of cold, the indicate that he was politically shrewd and a far king accompanied by his wife Devi Chellana, went to sighted king. worship Mahavira”.27 Thus Bimbisaras Jaina leanings may have been due to his wife Chellana. This Bimbisara had also established marital matrimony would have also contributed in relations with the republican state of Lichchhavis of enhancing the power and prestige of Magadha as Vaishali by marrying Chellna, the daughter of this was also a politically motivated alliance. Lichchhavi chief Chetaka.19 The Lichchhavis were powerful and belonged to the strong Vajjian Bimbisara had a queen named Khema, the confederation.20 The traditional sources inform that princess of Madradesa.28 The kingdom of Madra was the Lichchhavis attacked the Magadhan kingdom.21 situated between Chenab and Vyas rivers. Its capital Acording to D.R.Bhandarkar, in the above conflict, was Sakala or Siyalkot.29 According to Dhammapaa the Lichchhavis were defeated by Bimbisara and Attakatha, Khema was famous for her beauty.30 This

2 | Vol (8), No.1 Jan-Mar, 2021 IJISSHR

International Journal of Innovative Social Science & Humanities Research ISSN: 2349-1876 (Print) | ISSN : 2454-1826 (Online)

marriage would have established friendly relation of 3. R.K.Mookerji, Ancient India, pp.99-100. Bimbisara with a powerful kingdom of the north- 4. H.C.Raychaudhari,Political History of west. Bimbisara also had a queen named Vaidehi Ancient India, p.201. Vasavi. It is said that she had served food to Bimbisara and saved his life when he was in the 5. Ibid.,p.182 31 captivity of his son . 6. Ibid

The matrimonies of Bimbisara indicate that 7. Ibid.,p.183. he moved quite cautiously and consolidated his position by making friends all around him through 8. R.K.Mookerji, Ancient India,p.100. his matrimonial alliances. These relations of 9. , Sacred Book of the East, marriage are also eloquent witnesses to the high X,II,p.67. estimate held in other countries of the then political 10. Mahavagga,8-15, p.180; Texts, II, importance of Magadha. His diplomatic and Sacred Book of the East,XVII. matrimonial relations would have helped him considerably in the aggressive policy initiated by 11. Jataka,II,237, 403,IV, 342 ff; Rhys Davids, him. It appears that Bimbisara’s policy of dynastic The Cambridge , vol.I(ed. relations with the royal houses of Kosala, Madra and E.J.Rapson) Ancient India,p.162. Vaisali would have greatly helped in his expansionist 12. Samyutta,II,p.268; Sumangalavilasini,I, policy. Bimbisara not only appeared the most p.47;Saratthappakasini,II,p.2; Divyavadana, formidable militarist of his age, but eventually paved p.55; Jacobi, Jaina ,I, XII-XV; Rhys the way for the expansion of kingdom both Davids, The Cambridge History of India, westward and northward.32 Thus Bimbisara’s policy p.162. of establishing marital alliances with contemporary royal families would have not only increased the 13. Sacred Book of the EastXXII, pp.193,256. power, prestige and area of influence of the newly 14. Therigatha Commentary, pp. 49-50. established Haryanka dynasty but also helped him in establishing an extensive empire. However some 15. Vijayendra Suri, Mahavira’ II, historians have suggested that these marital pp. 638-39; A.Sinha, Bimbisara aur uski relations had some negative impact also because kutaniti, pp. 49-50. princess from different royal families had entered 16. A. Sinha, Bimbisara aur uski kuta Neeti, pp. into the royal family of Magadha, which would have 50. created a feeling of enmity in the royal palace, 17. H. C. Raychaudhuri, Political History of probably due to the royal interests of their maternal Ancient India, p.182. families. This negative impact could be witnessed in the reign of Ajatshatru, the son of Bimbisara as it led 18. Jataka, II,237.IV. 342ff; Jatakas Nos. to several wars. Thus, it can be said that Bimbisara’s 239,283,492; H.C. Raychaudhri, Ibid. p.182. marriages were deliberately planned to gain political 19. Samyutta,II,p.268; Sumangalavilasini,I, and strategic advances. p.47;Saratthappakasini,II,p.2; Divyavadana, p.55; Sacred Book of the East,I,XII-XV. REFERENCES 20. H. C. Raychaudhuri, Political History of Ancient India, p.119. 1. B.C.Law, Historical Geography of Ancient India, pp.44-45. 21. Si-yu-ki, B.K,IX; H. C. Raychaudhuri, Political History of Ancient India, p.113. 2. Ibid., p.44.

Vol (8), No.1 Jan-Mar, 2021 IJISSHR 3

International Journal of Innovative Social Science & Humanities Research ISSN: 2349-1876 (Print) | ISSN : 2454-1826 (Online)

22. D.R.Bhandarkar, Carmichael 27. Ibid. Lectures1918,p.74. 28. Therigatha Commentary,pp.139-143. 23. S.Chattopadhyaya, Bimbisara to Asoka, 29. Therigatha Commentary(ed. p.29; Nagari- Pracharini Patrika, N.K.Bhagat)52,pp. 72-73; A.Sinha, Bimbisara year,55,III,p.199. aur uski kuta Neeti, pp. 53. 24. Ibid. 30. Burlingam, Buddhist Legends, pp.225-226. 25. Rhys Davids, Buddhist India, p.13; N.N.Law, A.Sinha, Ibid. Aspects of Ancient Indian Polity, p.4. 31. Sacred Book of the EastXXII, pp.193,256. 26. R.C.Majumdar, A.D.Pusalker(ed.), History 32. H. C. Raychaudhuri, Political History of and Culture of Indian people,vol.II. The Age Ancient India, p.182. of Imperial unity, p.21.

4 | Vol (8), No.1 Jan-Mar, 2021 IJISSHR