DOCSLIB.ORG

The Morrison Government and China

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Morrison Government and China Facts 澳大利亚-中国关系研究院Australia-China Relations Institute 澳大利亚-中国关系研究院 August 30 2018 The Morrison Government and China On August 24 2018 Scott Morrison was elected new Foreign Minister Marise Payne in an August 27 leader of the Liberal Party by a party-room vote interview.3 and sworn in as Australia’s 30th Prime Minister. Ms Payne has indicated she will be meeting with Mr Morrison was Treasurer from September 21 Chinese officials during the UN General Assembly 2015-August 23 2018. He visited China at least Leaders’ Week in September.4 twice in that capacity, most recently in September 2017 to participate in the third Strategic Economic Australia’s 5G network and Huawei Dialogue in Beijing, the highest level bilateral Mr Morrison had on August 23 effectively economic meeting between Australia and China.1 announced the ban of Huawei and ZTE’s On Mr Morrison’s assumption of the prime participation in Australia’s 5G network during his ministership a spokesperson for the People’s two-day stint as Acting Home Affairs Minister. Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Foreign Affairs The ban was communicated obliquely through (MFA) congratulated Mr Morrison and said:2 a press release outlining the Australian China stands ready to work with the new government’s security directions on 5G. Under Australian government to move forward bilateral Australia’s Telecommunications Sector Security ties along the right track. Reforms, which come into effect on September 18, the government may direct a carrier, carriage Maintaining foreign policy continuity and service provider or carriage service intermediary consistency seems to be the name of the game in ‘to do, or not do, a specified thing that is a Morrison government. This was emphasised by reasonably necessary to protect networks and facilities from national security risks.’5 6 This fact sheet was prepared by Elena Collinson, Senior Project The press release read: and Research Officer, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney. The government considers that the involvement Images credit (left to right): Shutterstock; https://www.scottmorrison.com. au/; Shutterstock. 3 Sky News, ‘Marise Payne defends 5G block on Chinese telco’, Sky News, August 27 2018 <https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_5827190848001>. 4 Ibid. 5 Australian Department of Home Affairs, Telecommunications sector 1 Scott Morrison and Steven Ciobo, ‘Strategic economic dialogue with China’, security reforms <https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/consultations/ joint media release, September 15 2017 <http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov. telecommunications-sector-security-reforms>. au/media-release/091-2017/>. 6 Mitch Fifield and Scott Morrison, ‘Government provides 5G security guidance 2 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Foreign Ministry to Australian carriers’, joint media release, August 23 2018 <https://www. spokesperson Lu Kang’s regular press conference, August 24 2018 <http:// minister.communications.gov.au/minister/mitch-fifield/news/government- www.china-embassy.org/eng/fyrth/t1588050.htm>. provides-5g-security-guidance-australian-carriers>. W: australiachinarelations.org @acri_uts The Morrison Government and China 1 of vendors who are likely to be subject motivated, not the result of a fact-based, to extrajudicial directions from a foreign transparent, or equitable decision-making government that conflict with Australian law, process’.10 may risk failure by the carrier to adequately protect a 5G network from unauthorised access While Mr Morrison has not addressed the 5G or interference. decision and its exclusion of Huawei and ZTE, his incoming Foreign Minister, Marise Payne, in a The release carefully did not specify any particular Sky News interview on August 27, said that the country or company targeted by the government decision was ‘not targeted’ at those particular direction. companies, and that it was ‘aimed at solely protecting Australia’s interests and the protection Shortly after the publication of the release, of Australia’s national security’. She conceded, however, Huawei Australia announced via Twitter however, that Huawei and ZTE had ‘different that they had ‘been informed by the Govt [sic] that obligations’ and that extrajudicial direction was Huawei & ZTE have been banned from providing ‘part of the legal system in which [Huawei and 5G technology to Australia.’7 ZTE] work’ and that that was indeed ‘a concern’.11 The timing of the release – while public and media In the same interview, Sky News presenter David attention was fixed on leadership tensions in Speers put to Ms Payne speculation that the Canberra – resulted in minimal domestic news decision on 5G had been taken in the National coverage of the decision. However, it was swiftly Security Committee of cabinet 10 days before picked up by the PRC, who, through the MFA the announcement and that there had been and the Ministry of Commerce, communicated ‘some pushback, concern, debate about how it strong criticism of the ban. An MFA spokesperson would go down in China’.12 Minister Payne did not said the PRC was ‘gravely concerned’ about the comment on the National Security Committee’s decision. The spokesperson went on to say:8 deliberations but said it was ‘a very well- considered decision over an extended period of The Australian side should know better than time in all of its implications’.13 citing all sorts of excuses to erect artificial hurdles and enforce discriminatory measures. In an indication that the issue is unlikely to be We urge the Australian side to abandon its swept to one side by the PRC, the People’s Daily ideological bias and level the playing field for newspaper in an editorial on August 28 said Chinese enterprises’ operation in Australia. ‘Australia has a strong ideological prejudice on China and they are taking a discriminative The PRC’s Ministry of Commerce said the approach and trying to politicise business Australian government had made the ‘wrong operations.’14 As the Australian Financial Review’s decision’.9 China correspondent, Michael Smith, notes, the On August 24, Huawei released a statement People’s Daily ‘reflects the view of the Communist characterising the decision as ‘politically 10 Huawei Australia, Media statement: Huawei Technologies Global HQ, August 24 2018 <http://huaweihub.com.au/media-statement-huawei- 7 Huawei Australia, Twitter status update, @HuaweiOz, August 22 2018, 4.36 technologies-global-hq/>. pm <https://twitter.com/HuaweiOZ/status/1032411216184930304>. 11 Sky News, ‘Marise Payne defends 5G block on Chinese telco’, Sky News, 8 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Foreign Ministry August 27 2018 <https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_5827190848001>. spokesperson Lu Kang’s regular press conference, August 23 2018 <http:// 12 Ibid. www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1587703. 13 Ibid. shtml>. 14 Michael Smith, ‘China intensifies criticism of Australia’s Huawei 5G ban’, 9 Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, ‘The Australian Australian Financial Review, August 28 2018 <https://www.afr.com/news/ government’s 5G safety guide’, August 23 2018 <http://www.mofcom.gov. policy/foreign-affairs/china-intensifies-criticism-of-huawei-5g-ban- cn/article/ae/ag/201808/20180802778676.shtml>. 20180828-h14lr0>. W: australiachinarelations.org @acri_uts The Morrison Government and China 2 Party and rarely comments on Australian affairs asset, has rendered it difficult for Australian unless Beijing wants to send a clear message that bidders to be able to make a competitive bid.’18 it is unhappy.’15 The Chinese consortium withdrew their bid following this preliminary assessment. The sale of The opposition Australian Labor Party has S. Kidman and Co. was subsequently approved in requested a security briefing from the government December 2016, to a joint bid by Australian mining on the 5G decision. However, it is unlikely that they magnate Gina Rinehart and Chinese company would pursue a reversal of the decision were they Shanghai CRED. to win the next election unless the government’s decision was at odds with advice received On August 19 2016, Mr Morrison blocked China’s from security agencies. Shadow Minister for State Grid and the Hong Kong-listed Cheung Kong Communications Michelle Rowland stated:16 Infrastructure (CKI) from acquiring a majority stake (50.4 percent) in Ausgrid, the NSW electricity On matters of infrastructure security, Labor will distributor, citing national interest concerns always take the advice of our security agencies. regarding ‘the transaction structure…and the nature of the assets.’19 Foreign investment The PRC’s Commerce Ministry criticised the Some Chinese-language media outlets and decision as ‘clearly protectionist’ and said it China-based commentators have pointed to Mr ‘seriously hurts the enthusiasm from Chinese Morrison’s decisions on foreign investment as companies to invest in Australia.’20 Treasurer in discussing the new Prime Minister and how Australia-China relations may fare during Mr Morrison told talkback radio on September 5 his leadership. For example, Chinese financial 2016 that PRC-based investors understood the magazine Caixin Global headlined its report of Mr decision. He said: ‘If you wanted to do the same Morrison’s assumption of the prime ministership, thing in China you wouldn’t be allowed to do it.’21 ‘New Australian PM has history of blocking Chinese investment’.17 Mr Morrison had made it a point to note that in considering foreign investment applications, During
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Misconduct: the Case for a Federal Icac
    MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS A HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL ICAC INDEPENDENT JO URNALISTS MICH AEL WES T A ND CALLUM F OOTE, COMMISSIONED B Y G ETUP 1 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS MISCONDUCT IN RESOURCES, WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT Page 5 MISCONDUCT RELATED TO UNDISCLOSED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Page 8 POTENTIAL MISCONDUCT IN LOBBYING MISCONDUCT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO Page 11 INAPPROPRIATE USE OF TRANSPORT Page 13 POLITICAL DONATION SCANDALS Page 14 FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON THE POLITICAL PROCESS Page 16 ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT PRACTICES Page 17 CURRENT CORRUPTION WATCHDOG PROPOSALS Page 20 2 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS FOREWORD: Trust in government has never been so low. This crisis in public confidence is driven by the widespread perception that politics is corrupt and politicians and public servants have failed to be held accountable. This report identifies the political scandals of the and other misuse of public money involving last six years and the failure of our elected leaders government grants. At the direction of a minister, to properly investigate this misconduct. public money was targeted at voters in marginal electorates just before a Federal Election, In 1984, customs officers discovered a teddy bear potentially affecting the course of government in in the luggage of Federal Government minister Australia. Mick Young and his wife. It had not been declared on the Minister’s customs declaration. Young This cheating on an industrial scale reflects a stepped aside as a minister while an investigation political culture which is evolving dangerously. into the “Paddington Bear Affair” took place. The weapons of the state are deployed against journalists reporting on politics, and whistleblowers That was during the prime ministership of Bob in the public service - while at the same time we Hawke.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Abc Alumni Limited to Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications
    1 SUBMISSION OF ABC ALUMNI LIMITED TO SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS 13 November 2018 _______________________________________________ INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT ABC Alumni Limited represents a community of former staff and supporters of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. We campaign for properly funded, high quality, independent, ethical, and free public media in Australia. We promote excellence across all platforms through education, mentoring, public forums and scholarships. The selection of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s Board and Managing Director must be free of political favouritism. Funding for the ABC must be guaranteed. We welcome this inquiry into ‘allegations of political interference in the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)’. It is vitally important that the Senate committee establishes the detail; the who, what, where and, most importantly, why of Managing Director Michelle Guthrie’s dismissal and Board Chair Justin Milne’s subsequent resignation. We are alarmed by the widely publicised allegations made by Ms Guthrie about the conduct of Mr Milne (and any possible complicity by Board directors; for example, was there a failure to act on the allegations when presented with them?). Ms Guthrie’s allegations if true, in whole or in part, clearly indicate that the current legislation and Chair/Board appointment processes fail to protect the ABC from overt and covert political interference. This makes the corporation vulnerable to punitive funding cuts that affect its ability to continue to provide the range and quality of fearless, independent broadcasting and online publishing for which it is known. These issues are fundamental to the important contribution the ABC makes to Australian society. In our view there is a need for amendments to the ABC Act and for changes to existing processes for the appointment of the Chair and Board directors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Scott Morrison MP the Hon. Josh Frydenberg MP the Hon. Greg Hunt MP JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT STEPS to VICTORIA's REOPENI
    The Hon. Scott Morrison MP Prime Minister The Hon. Josh Frydenberg MP Treasurer The Hon. Greg Hunt MP Minister for Health JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT Monday 26 October 2020 STEPS TO VICTORIA’S REOPENING The Commonwealth Government welcomes the announcement by the Victorian Premier to ease restrictions from 11.59pm on Tuesday. Victorians have worked hard and sacrificed a lot to get to this point. We thank them for their patience and perseverance. Today’s announcement is a reflection of the dedication and effort of Victorians - taking the next step to reopen Victorian society and the state’s economy. After a long winter, there is light at the end of the tunnel for Victorians. As we said yesterday - Victorians have made great progress in reducing the rate of COVID-19 infections from the second wave outbreak in Victoria. The new National Framework to reopen by Christmas is a clear and transparent, three step national plan which provides the Australian community and businesses with a way forward where Australians can live and work in a COVID Normal Australia, ensuring that we maintain strong health protections and minimise job losses and mental health impacts. Under the new ‘National Framework’ released last week, Victoria is now moving towards Step 1 - an important step on the pathway to COVID Normal. Australia has been a world leader in fighting the virus to save lives and to save livelihoods and with today’s announcement, we look forward to Victoria continuing to make progress on the path to reopening and joining the rest of the country at Steps 2 and 3 in the national plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview
    Barton Deakin Brief: Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview Prime Minister Scott Morrison MP has announced his new Cabinet and Ministry following the change in The Nationals leadership. Cabinet Changes - Barnaby Joyce MP is the new Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development. Michael McCormack MP has been removed from the Cabinet and is now on the backbench. - David Littleproud MP retains his position as the Minster for Agriculture and is now also the Minister for Northern Australia. The role of Minister for Drought and Emergency Management will be given to Senator Bridget McKenzie. - Senator McKenzie will be returned to the Cabinet and is also the new Minister for Regionalisation, Regional Communications and Regional Education. - Keith Pitt MP, the Minister for Resources and Water will move to the outer Ministry, with his Northern Australia portfolio goes to David Littleproud MP. - Andrew Gee MP has been promoted to the Cabinet as the Minister for Defence Industry and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs. - Darren Chester MP, the former Minister for Veterans Affairs and Defence Personnel has been removed from the Cabinet and the Ministry. Ministry Changes - Mark Coulton MP, formerly the Minister for Regional Health, Regional Communications and Local Government is no longer a Minister. - Dr David Gillespie MP has become the Minister for Regional Health. For more information - The Ministry List from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet For more information, contact David Alexander on +61 457 400 524, Grahame Morris on +61 411 222 680, Cheryl Cartwright on +61 419 996 066 or Jack de Hennin on +61 424 828 127.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Great Power Competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH
    THE NEW GEOPOLITICS APRIL 2020 ASIA BEYOND BINARY CHOICES? Navigating great power competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH TRILATERAL DIALOGUE ON SOUTHEAST ASIA: ASEAN, AUSTRALIA, AND THE UNITED STATES BEYOND BINARY CHOICES? Navigating great power competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Brookings Institution has launched a new trilateral initiative with experts from Southeast Asia, Australia, and the United States to examine regional trends in Southeast Asia in the context of escalating U.S.-China rivalry and China’s dramatic rise. The initiative not only focuses on security trends in the region, but covers economic and governance developments as well. This report summarizes the main findings and policy recommendations discussed at an inaugural trilateral dialogue, convened in Singapore in late 2019 in partnership with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) and the Lowy Institute. A key theme running throughout the dialogue was how the region can move beyond a binary choice between the United States and China. In this connection, Southeast Asian countries could work with middle powers like Australia and Japan (admittedly a major power in economic terms) to expand middle-power agency and reduce the need for an all-or-nothing choice. Yet, there was little agreement on the feasibility of such collective action as well as doubts about whether the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has the capacity to create independent strategic space as U.S.- China competition continues to grow. Southeast Asian participants noted that Beijing has successfully leveraged its signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to expand its soft-power in the region, to the detriment of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Revival the Role of the States in Australia’S COVID-19 Response and Beyond
    State revival The role of the states in Australia’s COVID-19 response and beyond Australia’s states and territories have taken the lead in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, supported by constitutional powers and popular mandates. With the states newly emboldened, further action on climate change, changes to federal–state financial arrangements and reform of National Cabinet could all be on the agenda. Discussion paper Bill Browne July 2021 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them.
    [Show full text]
  • Work of Committees
    WORK OF COMMITTEES Financial Year Statistics: 1 July 2010–30 June 2011 Half-Year Statistics: 1 January 2011–30 June 2011 © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 ISBN 978-1-74229-503-9 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra CONTENTS Index ..................................................................................................................................... iii Format of this report .............................................................................................................. v Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ vi General Information ............................................................................................................. vii Directory of Committees....................................................................................................... ix Committees administered by the Senate Committee Office .................................................. x PART ONE: Legislation and References Committees at a glance 1 July 2010–30 June 2011 ...................................................................... 13 PART TWO: Consolidated Statistical Overview (Financial Year) 1 July 2010–30 June 2011 ...................................................................... 17 PART THREE: Matters Referred and Reports Tabled (By Committee) 2001–2011 ............................................................................................... 21 PART FOUR: Consolidated
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Australia
    Commonwealth of Australia Author Wanna, John Published 2019 Journal Title Australian Journal of Politics and History Version Accepted Manuscript (AM) DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12576 Copyright Statement © 2019 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics, School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Journal of Politics and History, Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 295-300, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/ajph.12576. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/388250 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Commonwealth of Australia John Wanna Turnbull’s Bizarre Departure, and a Return to Minority Government for the Morrison-led Coalition Just when political pundits thought federal parliament could not become even wackier than it had been in recent times, the inhabitants of Capital Hill continued to prove everyone wrong. Even serious journalists began referring to the national legislature metaphorically as the “monkey house” to encapsulate the farcical behaviour they were obliged to report. With Tony Abbott being pre-emptively ousted from the prime ministership by Malcolm Turnbull in 2015, Turnbull himself was, in turn, unceremoniously usurped in bizarre circumstances in August 2018, handing over the leadership to his slightly bemused Treasurer Scott Morrison. Suddenly, Australia was being branded as the notorious “coup capital of the Western democracies”, with five prime ministers in five years and only one losing the high office at a general election.
    [Show full text]
  • TELECOMS and the HUAWEI CONUNDRUM Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
    AEI ECONOMIC STUDIES TELECOMS AND THE HUAWEI CONUNDRUM Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States CLAUDE BARFIELD November 2011 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AEI ECONOMIC STUDIES TELECOMS AND THE HUAWEI CONUNDRUM Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States CLAUDE BARFIELD November 2011 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the following for commenting on parts or all of the manuscript or providing advice and counsel: Adam Lerrick, Theodore Moran, Daniel Rosen, Philip Levy, Mark Groombridge, William Plummer, Lixin Cheng, Derek Scissors, James Mulvenon, Charles Hunnicutt, Nicholas Lardy, Alex Pollock, Peter Wallison, and Richard Suttmeier. The author would also like to thank Robert Fisher and Patrick Schneider for research and fact- checking assistance. Any errors in fact or judgment are mine. iii Foreword n this first paper in the AEI Economic Studies benefitting from subsidized loans from the China Iseries, we present “Telecoms and the Huawei Development Bank. Conundrum” by Claude Barfield. While the paper In light of these fears, there has been an attempt traces the historical evolution of a single Chinese to marginalize the company in the US telecom mar- company, the backdrop is the role of China itself in ket. In 2010, when Sprint Nextel was considering the new world economic order. As China grows in awarding a multibillion dollar contract to Huawei, power and influence, its opaque and often secretive political interference from Washington prevented the nature continues to make other countries wary. deal from taking place. In February, the American Often the concern is merely economic, as many government even forced Huawei to undo a minor worry that Chinese firms receive benefits from the deal: the $2 million purchase of patents from 3Leaf, Chinese government that give them unfair advan- a bankrupt Silicon Valley startup.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Porter
    Article Talk Read View source View history Search Wikipedia Christian Porter From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 17:14, 25 February 2021 (Add: work. Removed parameters. Main page Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | Pages linked from Contents cached User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked 268/1473). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this Current events revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision. Random article (diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) About Wikipedia Contact us For the singer, see The Voice (U.S. season 4). Donate Charles Christian Porter (born 11 July 1970) is an Australian Liberal Party politician and Contribute The Honourable lawyer serving as Attorney-General of Australia since 2017, and has served as Member of Christian Porter Help Parliament (MP) for Pearce since 2013. He was appointed Minister for Industrial Relations MP Learn to edit and Leader of the House in 2019. Community portal Recent changes From Perth, Porter attended Hale School, the University of Western Australia and later the Upload file London School of Economics, and practised law at Clayton Utz and taught law at the University of Western Australia before his election to parliament. He is the son of the 1956 Tools Olympic silver medallist, Charles "Chilla" Porter, and the grandson of Queensland Liberal What links here politician, Charles Porter, who was a member of the Queensland Legislative Assembly from Related changes [4][5] Special pages 1966 to 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • I Justifying the Unjustifiable: a Critical Discursive Analysis of the Political
    i Justifying the Unjustifiable: a critical discursive analysis of the political rhetoric of asylum Isabella Rose Loxton This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the Honours degree of Bachelor of Psychological Science (Honours) School of Psychology University of Adelaide October 2018 Word Count: 8,900 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ................................................................................................................................... iii Declaration............................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... v Chapter 1 .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Other.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Nationalism ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 The Language of Asylum ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Thought Leaders Updated for the 45Th Parliament 31 August 2016 This Barton Deakin Brief Lists
    Barton Deakin Brief: Social Media Thought Leaders Updated for the 45th Parliament 31 August 2016 This Barton Deakin Brief lists individuals and institutions on Twitter relevant to policy and political developments in the federal government domain. These institutions and individuals either break policy-political news or contribute in some form to “the conversation” at national level. Being on this list does not, of course, imply endorsement from Barton Deakin. This Brief is organised by categories that correspond generally to portfolio areas, followed by categories such as media, industry groups and political/policy commentators. This is a “living” document, and will be amended online to ensure ongoing relevance. We recognise that we will have missed relevant entities, so suggestions for inclusions are welcome, and will be assessed for suitability. How to use: If you are a Twitter user, you can either click on the link to take you to the author’s Twitter page (where you can choose to Follow), or if you would like to follow multiple people in a category you can click on the category “List”, and then click “Subscribe” to import that list as a whole. If you are not a Twitter user, you can still observe an author’s Tweets by simply clicking the link on this page. To jump a particular List, click the link in the Table of Contents. Barton Deakin Pty. Ltd. Suite 17, Level 2, 16 National Cct, Barton, ACT, 2600. T: +61 2 6108 4535 www.bartondeakin.com ACN 140 067 287. An STW Group Company. SYDNEY/MELBOURNE/CANBERRA/BRISBANE/PERTH/WELLINGTON/HOBART/DARWIN
    [Show full text]