And Community Control Are Discussed, Drawn from Interview

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 049 330 24 UD 011 419

AUTHOR Maroson, Simon TITLE Dc';entralization and Community Control in Urban Areas. INSTITUTION Rutgers, The State Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. SPONS AGENCY National Center for Educ-,tional Research and Development (DHEW/CE), Washington, D.C. BUREAU NO BR-9-0551 PUB DATE 15 Jan 71 GRANT OEG-2-9-400551-1070(010) NOTE 22hp,

EDRS PRICE EDRS Price M.7-$0.65 HC-$9.87 DESCRIPTORS Administrator Attitudes, *Community Control, *Community Involvement, Educational Facilities, Integration Effects, Parent Attitudes, Public Schools, *Research Ciiteria, *School Integration, Statistical Data, Student Attitudes, *Urban Schools

ABSTRACT This is the report of a project executed to assist in developing research policies on urban education. Data vas gathered from several large cities, but detailed reports are included from Cleveland, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, and Oakland. Trends in urban education with respect to decentralization and community control are discussed, drawn from interview, observations, and statistical data These data provide the basis for determination of a plan for research on urban education, the development of a theoretical framework, and the development of research priorities in urban areas. (Author/DM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION E. WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED 00 NOT NECES- SARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFF ICE OF EDU CATION POSITION OR POLICY

DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL

IN URBAN AREAS

SIMON MARCSON

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY

UNDER A GRANT FROM

U.S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION

No. 0EG-2-9-400551-1070(010)

January 15, 1971

1 CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Chapter

1. DECENTRALIZATION ANE COMMUNITY CONTROL OF SCHOOLS: THE BOSTON CASE 1

2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND DECENTRALIZATION IN THE CLEVELAND, OHIO SCHOOL SYSTEM 37

3. PARTIAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION IN PHILADELPHIA 70

4. THE ADAMS-MORGAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL PROJECT: WASHINGTON, D C 88

5. LOS ANGELES: GUIDED PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL 106

6. ATTITUDES ABOUT DECENTRALIZED ANP COMMUNITY CONTROLLED SCHOOLS: OAKLAND 138

7. DETROIT: VOLUNTARY "DECENTRALIZED SCHOOL PLAN" . . 167.

8. CHICAGO; CONTROLLED ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRAL- IZATION IN AN URBAN SCHOOL SYSTEM 182

9. RESEARCH ON DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL 202 INTRODUCTION A

In pursuit of my project for developing research policies on urban

education, I visited the following cities: Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Boston,

Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles and the Berkeley-Oakland area. However, the reports

on the cities of Cleveland, Boston, and Oakland were included in this study through

contractual arrangements with specialists in these areas.

The visits to these cities have presented me with a picture of the trends

in urban education with respect to the issue of school decentralization and

community control. There is quite a variation in decentralization and community

control activity for each of the cities.They range all the way from a city such

as Detroit, which, under State legislation, must draw up decentralized community

school boundaries by January, 1970 to OaWand, California where seemingly very

little is occurting in school innovation, although there are deep community con-

flicts going on. Cities such as Cleveland and Chicago are approaching problems

of decentralization as administrative in character and have adopted a variety of

administrative types of decentralization, with Chicago also adopting for one area

of the city, a ccmmunity advisory council with a good deal of local decision-

making power. both Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. are examples of cities which

have undertaken small experiments in decentralization and community control and

have delegated a number of powers to one or two areas in these cities. Boston is

in a state of flux and has the possibilities of developing a system of integration

of its own, but there is a race against time there with legislation possibly

forthcoming from the State which may mandate decentralized school boundaries.

Los Angeles is in somewhat the same position with experiments going on in which

the school system has delegated powers to two complexes in the city which have

local advisory conmunity committees. At the same time, there is a movement on

for establishing school integration through a mandated busing system which has

little likelihood of being voted in, and if It is not voted in, the State will, 3 wIthin a year or so, vote legislation mandating school boundaries possibly in the same manner as the city of Detroit.

While there are some heartening events taking place In public education, especially in such cities as Los Angeles and Philadelphia, there is much to be discouraged about as these city school systems meet the profound problems of urban education. The city Inner-core schools have suffered from evey conceivable social and human problem, and continue to do so.one of the effects has been to stimulate a demand on the part of the racial and ethnic groups involved in these areas for control of their schools in their communities so as to 1 nrrcsato thuir cr111.1.1.1 tic effectiveness. This, obviously, would encourage a move towards not only urban area segregation, but also freeze the school segregation situation.Suppor- ters of public education have countered with demands that integration in the schools should be implemented and extended. A chief instrument of school Inte- gration in these cities is the institution of busing, so as to create a balance of school attendance by races and ethnic groups. However, school busing is, in turn, counteracted by powerful groups in the city. The result of this has been the rise of militants who have stated that since attempts at school Integration are a failure, the only solution is school decentralization with local community control. As this expresses itself in a city like Detroit, it means the establishment of school boundary lines along racial lines, thus giving the city &facto segregation. This has come to a head in Detroit with State legislation which makes it mandatory that the city establish boundary fines by January, 1970. The city, at the moment, Is divided as to whether to create school districts along integrated lines or de facto segregated lines. If the school board which is headed by integrationists decides in favor of the black militants, it will be creating a de facto segregated school boundary line system. The Courts have decided for the city in favor of "magnet" schools. The same demands are being expressed in Los Angeles, Oakland, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia.

The Boston situation is slightly different because of the relatively smaller 4 proportlor. of Negroes in the city population and the manner in which they are

distributed. So Boston has a chance of working out integration if the State,

In the meantime, does not pass similar legislation to that of Michigan, and

thereby force a quick decision on the part of the city which then might go in

the direction of de facto segregated school districts.

In the meantime, school systems such as that of Los Angeles, have under-

taken a number of interesting innovations to meet the challenge of the lower achievement levels of the ghetto schools, while Philadelphia is experimenting

in quite a different manner by taking a very large ghetto high school and decen-

tralizing it so as to create an organization of smaller school units as a basis

for providing a new system of motivation. All of these cities, except Oakland, are experimenting with the recognition of the role of parents in the community,

In parental participation as a motivating factor in child learning.

Each of the cities that I have visited are described in greater detail

as to their background characteristics and their educational trends. This data

provides the basis for a determination of a plan for research on urban education and for the development of a theoretical framework for such research. it is also

utilized to develop a plan of research in terms of priorities in selected urban areas.

Numerous school officials, teachers, parents, and community leaders

have given generously of their time in lengthy interviews and to them, I wish

to express my deep gratitude. Many colleagues in the universities of these

cP.les have been of assistance in guiding me to helpful sources of data, and

tn them Iwish to express my thanks and appreciation. Several colleagues in

universities have participated actively in this study by contributing chapters

and these Iwant to single out for my personal commendation:Professor Ronald

G. Corwin; Professor Leila Sussman, and Dr. Glen P. Nimnicht. I am indebted also

to my secretary, Mrs. Sondra Palmieri, for her inestimable assistance In

facilitating the work onthis project and for typing and binding.To Robert 5 Marcson, my gratitude goes for numerous and arduous tasks involving research, clerical work, and proof - reading. Finally, to Robert Havlghurst, my thanks for wise guidance. CHAPTER I

DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL

OF SCHOOLS: THE BOSTON CASE

Introduction

Of the major city school systems included in this study, Boston could achieve school integration before any other if the factors favoring such a development were utilized. The fact that only 16% of Boston's population in 1970 is Negro is, in

itself, an important assist in developing an integrated system. At the same time

that the percentage of Negro in the population is low, the concentrated Negro population while high (54'/o in model city area; 60% in Roxbury area; 69% in Washington

Park area) have not reached the density depths to be found in ghettos in other cities.

Population concentrations of this type remain amenable to reduction to at least 50%

levels in urban planning programs. While much of the impetus for decentralization his come from the Black Power movement, these groups remain relatively weak and would not be able to successfully obstruct a strong integrationist movement.

State legislation on the books since 1965 establishes standards pressing for

integration. The law's objectives are that no school may have a pupil population more than 50% non-white. Boston's Negro school population remains well below the

law's standard, at 30% of the city school population.The State, too, is providing

for transportation for all those who take advantage of its open enrollment policies.

The Boston school system has adopted a program for developing a balanced school program. The school system's policy of "limitation by partial incorporation" has

implicit factors aiding the evolution of an integrationist school system.

Htr,:over, there ore barriers at the same time to integration and factors assisting the continuous segregationist processes. The segregated areas of Boston

(Roxbury, N. Dorchester, Model City, Washington Park) contain 95% of Boston's Negro population. Segregation seems to be increasing rather than decreasing. In 1960

Roxbury was 44% non-white. In 1968 Roxbury had increased in Negro population to

60%. In 1965, the pupil non-white population constituted 25% of the school population

7 -2-

snd in 1969 it had increased to 30%. Thirty-five per cent of Negro studelts were

In highly segregated elementary schools (90% or more Negro). At the same time, at

the sixth grade level the reading scores of Negroes were 4.6 and that of white

pupils, 5.0. At the eighth grade level, Negro pupil reading scores fell to 3.0

and white pupil reading scores fell to 4.6. Obviously the school system was failing

both its Negro and white pupils, but Ole major sufferers were the Negroes.

What, then, are the chances for an integrated school system in the one major

city where its objective chances are good?its' move toward full desegregation is

bleak, and, therefore, its chances of moving towards a fully Integrated school system

Is fairly low. At the same time,the signs of the school system's move to decentra-

lization and community control is not on the horizon.

"h12 Factors in the Movement Toward Decentralization ano_Communit_y_Controll

The two chief sources of the movement toward decentralization of urban school

systems and community control of schools in the nineteen-sixties have been Black

Power and the federal legislation -- beginning with the Economic Opportunity Act and continuing through the urban renewal, health, mental health, model cities and educa-

tion laws which have Included "community participation" as part of their decision- making mechanisms.

Boston is no exception.While the movement here is weak, such initiatives as

there are have their roots in federal legislation, Black Power, or both.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Very little has happened at the state level in the matter of school decentralization. In 1968-69, Representative Paul Frye introduced into the Massachusetts

legislature a bill to study the feasibility of community-controlled schools. On

November 25, 1969, Representative Frye told a forum at the new Trotter school in

Boston that his bill had not received serious consideration by the education committee of the legislature and that he would need much stronger public pressure than he had

1Thls Section has been prepared in thecourse of this study by Leila Sussman of

Tufts University. 8 -3- secured to date to guarantee it such consideration.He also announced his willingness, if assured of substantial public support, to introduce a bill revising the method of Electing school committees in the cities and towns of the state. School committees are now chosen in at-large elections. In Boston, in the 19th century, the School Committee members were elected by wards.The at-large election is said to have been introduced around 1900 to keep the g,owin3 Irish Catholic minority off the Committee. Today the School Committee is almost totally Irish Catholic; there have been only four members since 1940 who did not have Irish names. At present the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF)in cooperation with the Community Education Pro-

Ject (a black group dedicated to community control of schools) is suing in court to test the legality of electing the School Committee on an at-large basis.

"According to the LDF suit, the at-large system should be replaced by a district system of election, which would virtually assure at least one black member on the School Committee. Each school would also have a neighborhood governing board, elected from the parents, teacher, students and local community that would supervise local function of the school and aid the district Board member. "The suit received a fiery response from School Committee Chairman John Kerrigan who called it an example of 'regression' and 'separatism'."*

Few legal experts in Boston or Cambridge give the LDF suit much chance in court. Its contention that no black man can be elected in Boston in an at-large contest isteakened by the fact that a black candidate, Thomas Atkins, won a seat on the City Council in an at-large election in 1967 and was recently re-elected, running second to Louise Day Hicks.

The Massachusetts Department of Education has an impact on community participation in education in Boston In two ways: I)it is charged with enforcing the state Racial Imbalance Law In the schools; 2) Title 1 and Title 111 ESEA funds flow into the city mainly via the state.

The Massachusetts Racial Imbalance Law requires every school committee to work

* Bulletin of the Citizens for Boston Schools, October 1969, p. 1. 9 _4-

toward a situation wherein no school has a pupil population more than 50% non-white.

It was passed in 1965 by a coalition of blacks and suburban white liberals. (An analysis by a University .)f Massachusetts political scientist showed that no white

legislator who voted for it had more than a tiny number of Negro constituents.)

The cities of Massachusetts which have large concentrations of Negro population are Springfield, New Bedford, Worcester. Medford and Boston. Of all these cities,

Boston has been the most laggard in taking steps to enforce the law. In 1965

Boston's school population was only 25% non-white; today the figure is about 30X.

A vigorous program of positive enforcement might have made the elimination of racial

imbalance feasible. However Boston did no more than institute open enrollment; a plan under which seats still empty after neighborhood demand was filled would be open

to children from outside the neighborhood.However, Boston refused to pay the transportation costs of children who chose to take advantage of such openings; it failed to publicize them or to encourage minority children to make Jse of them.) The notion

that the 'aw might be Implemented by transporting children to schools outside their neighborhoods with public funds was so distasteful to the Boston electorate that

the anti-"bussing" aild "neighborhood schools" slogans almost won the mayoral campaign for Louise Day Hicks in her contest with Kevin White.

The inability of the Massachusetts Department of Education and the Boston

School Department to agree on any plan under which Boston might conform to the law

to the state's satisfaction reached such a pass that for six months during 1966-67 all state funds for education were withheld from the city (under a provision of the

law) thereby worsening Bo. :on's already bad school finances. While the hostility between the two agencies remains great, the.-: is now an agreement to work through a

Racial imbalance Task Force fo plan the siting of new schools in such a way as to minimize racial imbalance. For every new school which opens racially balanceu, the

state pays 65% of the construction costs; otherwise the city pays 60%. Boston has

'This year, for the first time, the state is paying the transportation costs of those who take advantage of the open enrollment plan. 10 .5. presented to the state plans for 25 new schools to be built by 1973 which will take

8000 black pupils out o lmbalanced schools and put them into balanced ones. As a critic of the plan has pointed out, this will still leave 20,000 non-white children in imbalanced schools. The plans hardly seem conceived to deal with the growing proportion of the pupil popuiatlon which is non-white and with the spreading boundaries of minority neighborhoods. It is not even conceived to correct the racial imbalance which existed in 1965.The only solution to that oblation was to bus all the Negro children to schools outside their neighborhoods, while the badly deteriorating schools in their neighborhoods were torn down and replaced. Because Boston refused to pay for bussing out, the ones of attempting it fell on the Negro community. Two organizations -- Metco, which busses Negro children to suburban schools with the help of Federal funding, and Exodus which busses them within the city with the help of volunteer funding, are both efforts mounted and run by Negro leaders.

They have met with some success but they have been small.

The nhief consequence of Boston's Inadequate effort to desegregate seems to be growing abandonment ofcbsegregation as a goal.When the first of the new

racially balanced schools -- the William Monroe Trotter in the heart of Roxbury -- opened this past September, It was greeted with protests from the black community because white children were recruited throughout the city and even from some suburbs

to produce "racial balance" in this attractive new school building while neighborhood black children had to be excluded from It lh order to conform to the law.To quote Thomas Atkins -- one of the authors of the Racial imbalance Law; "There aren't (any longer) enough white kids to go around, unless you have a bussing pro-

gram as big as the MBTA. (The MBTA is the Public Transportation System).

"Also, the black community is much less willing to support balance today. No- body seriously believes there ever will be racial balance In the schools.

"So people are saying 'Why keep running into stone walls?'...He compared the

Racial Imbalance Law to Prohibition saying that the great bulk of Boston reoldtots don't support It or care about it. The changes he would ask would allow the State 11 -6-

Board of Education to count 'educational Innovations' as compliance with the law under certain conditions.

"'fly innovations, !mean upgrading the curriculum, hiring black teachers and administrators and increasing the community's role.When Igo to the State House with this proposal, I'll have a strange -ross-section of support -- but that's all right. Frequently the right thing is done for the wrong reason, and I'll take

support wherever I can get it'. "1 (underlining added)

The "strange crass- section of support" Atkins is referring to is the combina- tion of white liberals, who are supporting community control as a substitute for desegregation because they believe that is what the black community now wants, the community control faction in the black community itstif, and the white segregationists led by Louise Day Hicks, who have long wanted to repeal the Racial Imbalance Law and who have consistently sought to maintain racial segregation in public education under the slogans of "no bussing" and "neighborhood schools".However, while the white supporters of "neighborhood schools" have wanted to maintain exclusively local recruitment to schools In order to exclude blacks from s,:hools in white neighborhoods, the black community accepts this condition only as an aspect of a transfer of power over the neighborhood schools from the existing. overwhelmingly white school bureaucracy to a new group which will include black educators and black community. When Louise Day Hicks and John Kerrigan talk of neighborhood schools they do mean to defend the continuance of de facto segregation; they do not mean

"community control" or anything appro.nc,i,Ing it. Nevertheless, a rapproc!cnent between the white segregationists and black separatists on the issue of community control seems not only possible butlikely. For the white, it would end the threat of desegration; for Acme bleAs, it would mean rapid mobility into posts which they perceive as positions of power.The obstacle to such a compromise is the school bureaucracy and the teacher's union -- some of whom wr,uld lose seniority and

Illax State Banner, November 27, 1969, p. 9. 12 -7- perhaps jobs under the arrangement.

A number of the new parent groups which have recently sprung up in Boston to ask for, or even demand, some participation in school affairs (there have been 2.0-

30 of them within the past two years) can be traced to the organizing efforts of

the neighborhood 0E0 staffs. In Boston these are called Area Planning Action

Councils (APACs).Generally the APAC education coordinator calls a meeting of parents and other community pr,, ,e concerned with the schools and tries to find out what issues are most likely to provide an initial basis for organization.They

then try to help such an organization get started and become strong enough to continue on its own momentum. An example is the start of such an organization by

the AMC worker in an Italian section of Boston, the North End.Most elementary

school children in this neighborhood attend parochial schools; but the parochial high schooi cannot accommodate a.11 who would like to attend It, and besides, the neighborhood was somewhat concerned over rumors that the Archdiocese might close

the Catholic High School for financial reasons. At the first meeting chaired by

the APAC coordinator, a questionnaire was distributed asking people to list their main concerns relating to the schools. It turned out that the major interest was

in having some kind of guidance for youngsters leaving junior high school to help

them choose an appropriate public high schools. The guidance counsellor supposed

to serve the area was apparently seldom there. The discussion focussed on the mechanics of bringing this matter to the attention of the right officials "down-

town" and of bringing enough pressure to make sure something was done about it.

From there the discussioh moved on to the fact that the junior high schooi princ-

cipal was soon to retire and that the group ought to give some thought to the kind

of person it wanted as a replacement and how to get him. Members of the group

were very Ill-informed concerning the structure and functioning of the public

school system and the appropriate channels of communication. They seemed to be

becoming aware of this and of the need to learn more about how to go about getting

what they wanted from 15 Beacon Street.Though attendance at the meeting was very 13 -8-

low -- there were on;y 20 people present and of these only 8 were parents of school children -- this nevertheless became the nucleus of a new neighborhood schools group. Like others of its kind, it is hlt aggressive. its requests to the School

Department tend to be limited, specific, and the very opposite of radical -- since

they do not envision any basic changes in die schools' structure, curriculum or pedagogical philosophy. Yo a very considerable extent, these groups focus on deficiencies of the physical plant -- which are grave in Boston, on the need for hot lunches, on the occasional teacher whose classroom behavior suggests that she

is mentally ill, and on such grievances as a sixth grade teaching principal so busy with administrative tasks that she has no time to teach.(This case went all the way to the School Committee, thence to the Mayor and back to the School Committee which finally told the parents they would have to choose between an adJitional

teacher and having the school painted since there was not enough money for both.

They chose thit teacher. F,Fidently, the School Committee had intended to paint.)

Occasionally these groups expand their interests to matters of larger import.

In East Boston, "Parents and Teachers Who Care" began with complaints about the existing school plant, but now have become concerned with the forseeable need for a new school to accommodate the growing child population and with the paucity of available land for bJilding. This has brought them into conflict with the Port

Authority which is also concerned to buy land in East Boston for other purposes.

Funds which have come into Boston through Title 111 of the ESEA have giver

rise to the development of the two most important community school groups in the city: the King-Timilty Community School Advisory Council -- a black group located

In Roxbury, Boston's oldest and largest black community; and the Quincy School

Community Council located In the South Cove, which includes Chinatown, and over-

flows into a large housing project in the South End, which is ethnically mixed.

The King-iimilty Community School Advisory Council is the USOE's Central

Cities Task Force Project ire Boston. Efforts to develop something resembling this council had started in 1967 when parents, schoolmen, community leaders and 1-1Prvlrd 14 -9-

Universtty researchers formed a coalition to work on a proposal to the Ford Foun- dation to finance a school-community council for this Roxbury neighborhood. When information was received that the Central Cities Task Force would make $1,500,000 available to Boston over a three year period for an intensive, Innovative, inner-city project, members of the coalition persuaded the Boston School Committee to make this groups of schools - the Martin Luther King middle school and the Timilty junior high school, together with their ten feeder elementary schools, all located in Roxbury and about 90 percent black - the focus of the Task Force project. The main aims of the project as stated In the official proposal were I)to improve communication between the community, especially the parents, and the schools; 2)to develop new educational programs suited to the particular needs of this community and directed to residents of all ages, these programs to be evolved with community participation.

The rhetoric of the proposal avoided "community control".Nevertheless it received the approval of the Boston School Committee oy a vote of only 3-2 with Chairman

Thomas Eisenstadt and John Kerrigan voting "no". Eisenstadt was quoted in the press as saying "We are in effect giving control to the community, no matter how you want to doctor it up with fancy language.We are vesting control in them."

Thus far, however, the Council has not fulfilled the hopes or fears of any extremist group. Is is not in control" of the schools; bvt neither is it the totally ineffective, powerless, advisory group the militants expected it to become.

A problem which confronted the Council immediately and which plagues it to this day is the refusal of the "community control" militants in Roxbury to participate. The militants are committed to the view that they must not work "within the system". Benjamin Scott, for instance, has frequently said in public speeches that state and federal funds for Boston school projects should not be accepted since they shore up a school system which would otherwise collapse -- presumably raking possible some kind of community "take-over".

The militants have as yet, however, only a tiny constituency. Their aims are more plitical than educational.They see community control - of all Instit,Jtions 15 -10-

in their community - as a means of increasing black power. The black parents of

Boston, on the other hand, seem more concerned with raising their children's educational achievement than they are with community control in the broader political sense.

Nevertheless, the militants played a part in achieving the King-Timilty Council', most striking result. After the Council was organized, the white principals of

the King and Timilty schools applied for transfer. Immediately the Council (advised by some Harvard University professors and graduate students) pressed the Superinten- dent of Schools to recommend blacks to fill these posts.Since there were no blacks on the principals list, Superintendent Ohrenberger claimed he could do nothing.

(in Boston appointment to any post higher than that of teacher must be the appointment of someone from within the system).The School Committee, when approached,

referred the matter back to the Superintendent for "nominations".Two white men on the list were nominated by Ohrenberger and approved by the School Committee.

At this point several militant groups and self-designated militant leaders

Joined forces to pressure the King-Timilty Council to insist that the decision be

rescinded. They threatened that if the Council did not act they would use "their own methods".The Council, in turn, renewed their demands for the appointment of blacks. They threatened to dissolve themselves as an organization if the demands were not met (thereby depriving Boston of a tidy sum of federal money). In the meantime, the two new white principals asked for transfers. Both they and the

Superintendent seemed convinced there would be violence unless the demand for black appointees was met. Finally, the School Committee named two black assistant principals who were not on the list as "acting principals" of the King and Timilty schools. The vote was 3-2 with Chairman Eisenstadt and future Chairman John

Kerrigan voting "no". However, the Committee rejected the request that the Council have a part in selectito the appointees.

This was a remarkable event in the annals of Boston school history.Never before had a principal, even an acting principal, been appointed who was not ",: t'oe 16 -11- list" -- and certainly never before had a personnel decision of such import been taken so largely as a result of pressure from the community affected by it.The

Boston Teachers' Union passed a resolution objecting to by-passing the rated list but dO no more about the matter. On the other hand, the militants attempted to exploit their apparent advantage by takeover of the Christopher Gibson School, one of the feeder elementary schools in the district. The "community", meaning the militant leaders, named Benjamin Scott as principal of their "liberation" school.

With a small number of pupils and six teachers, the school remained open for about a month - after which most of the pupils returned to the Gibson and the teachers were dismissed. A somewhat similar attempt by a group of militants calling themselves the "king Cabinet" to take over and re-open the King school under their own control during a period when it had been closed due to student disorders lasted only part of one day. When the King school closed again at a later date, due to further disorders, the King Cabinet conducted Learning Centers which ran for about two weeks while the school remained closed. However, the centers disappeared when the King school reopened.

Despite the fact that their direct action tactics failed to gain them control of the Gibson or King schools, the militants' pressure on the King-TImilty Council leading to the Council's firm stanc,,*itch, In turn, led the School Committee for the first time in its history to appoint administrators not on the official promotion list and to share their appointment authority with the affected community is the most outstanding event in King-Timilty's history so far. it Is also significant that the Boston Teachers' Union raised only mild objection.

On the other hand, John Kerrigan who denounced the appointment of `le black acting principals, ran first 1'the subsequent School Committee electiw. (Themes

Eisenstadt did not run again.) And the Boston Teachers' Union was adamantly oppcosed when one of.the black acting principals having resigned, the Council proposed the appointment of a Negro from Newton as his replacement. The CaLincil finally obtained the appointment of Rollins Griffith, the black principal of the 17 -12- experimental Lewis School in Boston. So it is difficult to estimate just how much this particular breaking of precedent may mean for the future.

Another place where the King-Timilty Council has had some effect on personnel is in the appointment of community residents and parents as aides in the schools.

Some of the people they recommended were vetoed by the School Department.However, the Council has been urging that the aides be changed from temporary to regular appointees with many of the fringe benefits enjoyed by teachers.

In areas other than that of influencing personnel selection, the Council has been much less successful. A major task it set for Its first year -- organizing a broad base in the community -- has yet, in the middle of its second year, to begin. The failure has been due la part to the split between the militants and the Council; in part to the fact that energies were diverted to containing the severe student disorders which 'broke out in the Timilty and particularly in the King school during the first year;to delays in actually obtaining the federal funds which had been appropriated; but above all, perhaps to the inherent difficulty of involving parents in sustained effort vitlich requires regular attendance at meetings and a continued contribution of time and work from them.Only a minority of residents participate in such organizations in middle class American communities where voluntary associations are a characteristic institution. In communities like

Roxbury, where formal associations also abound amcag the middle class, but not among the low income group, the effort to organize a low-income neighborhood must be expected to produce a minority response. Nevertheless, the 119 out of

2000 eligible parents who voted to replace the self-recruited "interim" group with a duly elected King-Timilty Council in March, 1969, is evidence that the

Council has no broad base In the community.Also unfortunate was that there was almost no overlap in membership between the interim Council and the elected

Council. In other words, the political kncw-how acquired by the members of the

interim Council and their knowledge of the schools' affairs was to some extent

lost in the process of succession. 18 -13-

The King-Timilty Council has also been - to date - largely ineffective in

the matter of new curriculum -- for the schools or educational programs for the community. No curriculum changes of significant scope have been initiated.The

Council has not found a way to initiate such changes. One of the major obstacles has been the Implicit split between the parent-members and the school-staff members.

Both groups are deeply concerned about the low achievement of the children. Both are aware that graduates of the schools -- even those who are graduated with relatively high grades -- tend not to survive in the city-wide academic high school curriculum. Within the Council there has developed an unfortunate tendency for the community members to blame the schoolmen (black or white -- in fact, the blame has fallen largely on blacks); and for the schoolmen (black - the whites do not dare to be so critical) to blame the community. The community members claim that the teachers should be held accointable for teaching their children to read at grade level, for instance. This view is firmly rejected by the schooimen who accuse the community of failing to provide the kind of educational support at home which would make "average" grade level achievement possible. The parents do not understand the extent to which the home is implicated in educational achievement and in mar., cases, neither do the teachers. They simply accuse the parents of sending them such misbehaving, out-of-control pupils that they must spend the larger part of the school-day preserving order rather than teaching.

One interesting development has been a continuing dialogue between the Council and the Ooston Teachers' Union. On the whole, the Teachers' Union has supported rather than opposed the Council,For example, the Teachers in the King and

Timilty schools were promised overtime pay for staying in school an extra hour each day to plan the school-work of the coming days. The money for this extra time has not been forthcoming from the city and the Teachers' Union has backed the

King and Timilty teachers in their demands that they be paid for this planning time.

At present, while the King-Timilty Council is preparing a proposal to USOE 19 -14- for the continuation of its activities into a third year, a pervasive complaint of parent-members is that the "professionals", meaning the school-staff members and the paid full-time Council staff, have "taken over" - making all the decisions without consulting them except for rubber stamp approval.

How one evaluates the achievements of the King-Timilty Council depends on one's political stance. For the moment it appears that the two black principals have

"taken over". In return for promises of broad and swift cooperation from the Boston

School Department, they promised - and they have fulfilled the promise - to restore order to these very nearly chaotic schools. Both of the Hack principals are themselves long term members of the Boston school system, and It i5 very likely that they believe only trained schoolmen can hope to effect favorable change in these schools. It remains to be seen whether they are equally sensitive to the frustration in the lay community and to their opportunity to harness the community's strong resentmentagainst the Inadequacy of their children's academic performance and use It for positive educational ends.Restoring order In the schools falls far shot of what the black community wants and expects. It wants academic results -- unrealistically soon, no doubt. If the Council falls to produce these results, the black militants will use this as ,,ne more proof that nothing can be accomplished

"within the system" -- that the black community must in effect secede from the

"racist" Boston School system and create Its own network of clenunity-control led schools.

The King-Timilty Community School Advisory Council is the nearest thing to a large-scale experiment in community "control" of public schools which exists in

Boston. The Quincy School Community Council (QSCC)- an equally significant group - has had a quite different history. Thus far, It has had little to do with participation in the existing elementary schools of its district. Its main focus has been on planning a new K-5 Quincy school to replace - In part - the existing

Quincy and Abraham Lincoln elementary schools of the South Cove.QSCC was not directly a creation of Title III nor of any government or university agency. it 20 -15- came into existence rather as a community reaction to plar,ing activities of these agencies which were already under way.

For over two years prior to the formation of the Quincy School Community

Council, there was a Quincy School Project in Cie Planning Office of Tufts-New

England Medical Center (T-NEMC). The Plnnning Office was sub - contracted by the

Boston School Department to "plan an innovative environment" for the new Quincy

School, projected under a Title ill contract to replace the historic Quincy School on Tyler Street.Undlr another Title 111 contract, a team of health specialists

in the Medical Center were planning an experiment with delivery of health services

to children via the elementbry school.

The Quincy School Project had an Advisory Council on which were represented

the state and city agencies with a jurisdictiolal relationship to new schools in

Boston. It met monthly to hear progress reports and give advice.The South Cove

Recreation Committee representing a number of local agencies also advised the Pro- ject staff.

Nineteen sixty-six to sixty-seven was devoted mainly to planning on paper.

During 1967-68, the Project staff and health team began to test sore of their plans on a pilot basis in the existing Abraham Lincoln and Quincy schools. They carried

°a extensive physical and dental examinations of pupils, and they t.led out a social studies curriculum (which they Judged to be inappropriate for :these pupils).

The work brought them into contact with teachers, pupils and families. In late spring the staff felt that this contact ought not to lapse during the summer vacation but should be used as a springboard for broader community participation

in the project. To that 'Ad, two steps were taken.A summer recreation program serving children of the area WO mounted in Castle Square, (a D-3 housing project

in the South End) and the Educational Planning Center and T-NEMC jointly sApplied

funds to hire a community organizer.

A young woman with unique qualifications was found for the task. She time

Chinese-American, born in Boston, and had friends and relatives in Castle Square 21 -16- and Chinatown. She was also Li graduate student of social work and as such, had some professional acquaintance with the techniques of community organization. She was Joined in her work by a young man, also Chinese-American, who was employed by the Student Health Project (financed by the Social Research Service.)

These two spent the summer learning all they could about the Quincy School

Project and discussing its purposes and methods with the residents of Castle Square,

Chinatown, and to a lesser extent, Bay Village. They tried to make personal contact with evetione who had had anything to do with the Project, and in addition, with a large number of people who knew nothing of it. In this they had the in- valuable assistance of Chinese-speaking friends and relatives who could reach a portion of the constituency whom no non-Chinese speaker could contact.

By midsummer, they had compiled a list of interested community people.Given this groundwork, a meeting between the Tutts staff and 'embers of the community seemed likely to be successful (Such meetings had been called twice before with

little response).The meeting was scheduled for August 15 in Castle Square. it was advertised in print, by buil horn, and by word-of-mouth.Fifty to ixty residents of Ca tie Square, Bay Village and the greater South End attended. They heard a description of the Project by members of the staff and they asked challenging questions. The central challenge was: Why had the staff taken so long to ca e to the community? By what right did they plan for, rather than with, the community?

Chellenes like this had a familiar ring in the United States in 1568.The particular case aside, there was a widespread feeling, though not universally shared, that they deserved a serious response.

In the particular case, it was agreed that the matter be discussed further.

From among those present, representatives of each community and of Tufts were chosen for a Temporary Committee which met the following week -- and every week thereafter.

The August 15 meeting thus initiated a conversation -- between the Quincy 22 -17-

School Project staff and the cL4lunities; within each community; and within the

staff. Each component of the Temporary Committee had to establish its legitimacy

in the eyes of the others. The Project staff wanted assurance that it was dealing

with groups which could legitimately claim to represent China 3wn, Bay Village and

Castle Square, the three coifunitls in the catchment area of the new Quincy School.

Community representatives challenged the legitimacy of all decisions made without

their participation. They wanted to know what powers the Project staff commanded

and how far these powers would be shared with them.

Through September and October, the groups acted to meet each other's chal-

lenges. The three communities sought proce6-res for legitimizing their represen-

tation. In each case, the task was slightly' different. In Bay Village, a Neighbor-

hood Association chose delegates to represent it, giving each the power to vote the

Interests of the community as he saw them.A Castle Square Neighborhood Association

was in the process of being founded and building Its membership. In mid-Novembe.,

It designated delegates to represent the community in the permanent Council. The

Castle Square delegates adopted a procedure of caucusing each time there was a

vote -- first to determine whether to cast their votes as individuals or as a unit -

and if as a unit, how to cast them.

Chinatown had a recognized set of organizations which care for and represent

the community's interests. After meetings of the Chinese Benevolent Association

(C.B.A.) and the ChineaeAmer.ca-1 Civic Association (C.A.C.A.), the latter group was

designated by C.B.A. to choose delegates for Chinatown.Having been selected,

the Chinatown delegates decided to vote according to a unit rule.

The Tufts staff wrestled with the qiestion of whether they ought to act as a

liaison betseen the Planning Office aild the communities, or whether they ought

to have a closer link with the group which was taking form. They had to clarify

to the community representatives that they could speak only for the Planning Office and not for the whole T-NEMC. They also had to communicate large amounts of Infor- mation concerning their work of the previous twenty months -- and the community 23 -IC-

representatives had to absorb the information -- all very rapidly, The process was not without misilaps.

At the end of September, a community representative suggested a plan for a

permanent Quincy School Community Council.The Tufts staff developed the pion in

the form of a outing structure which gave them membership in the permanent group and made it possible for either the staff or the three communities to veto pro-

posals of the other. The community representatives rejected this structure and

countered with another which, after much discussion, was adopted at the end of

October. Chinatown was assigned 5 votes; Castle Square, 5; Bay Village, 3; the

South End, 1; and the Tufts staff, 5. Decisions could be made by majority vote with the minority having an option to write a dissenting report.

in the seven months after it was created, this voting mechanism was used oniy

two or three times. Virtually every decision the Quincy School Community Council made in that period, was made by consensus.Where a consensus could not be

reached, decisions were postponed in the hope that a consensus would have formed at a later date.

By th2 time the voting structure was adopted, the legitimacy of the Council's component groups for each other was reasonably well established.All parties had made concessions. The Tufts staff became part of the Council sans veto power.

They agreed that ail past decisions were subject to review, while reminding the

Council that there was not unlimiteo tire for the process.The Advisory Council had invited t(le Community Councii to send representatives to its meetings. At the

request of the Community Council they had also agreed to hold public meetings In

the future so that community residents who wished to might attend.

The three communities had gone to pains to develop legitimate procedures for ch-ns1n9 representatives to the Council. They met Tufts' plaint that there were no funds for comminity work with the offer to work without funds. Twelve well-

attended weekly meetings demonstrated that the offer was not an idle one. 1 estimate conservatively that through the end of May, 1969, 3.000 volunteer man- 24 -19- hours had gone into Council rmetings end at least an ecpal number into working subcommittee meetings. This lee!..s out of account the long hours of informal personal discussion within and between delegations which go far to explain the

Council's capacity to maintain a consensus.

The consensus was notable because the Council is in many ways a diverse group,

representing different interests. Bay Village is a neighborhood of white residents with a high average income. Many own their own homes, valuable property near the city's core. Castle Square is a D-3 apartment development with white, black, Puerto Rican and Chinese families and a considerably more modest average

income than Bay Village. Chinatown is heterogeneous, with second-and third- generation families and a new group of non-English speaking immigrants from Hong

Kong. Incomes range from very low to quite comfortable. On the Council there are parents and non-parents; conservatives, moderates and radicals; and an age group

from the teens to the sixties.

However, Council members share a characteristic which makes them somewhat alike for all their diversity: a high educations) level. A large proportion of active Council members arc college-eeucated, and several have formal schooling beyond the Bachelor's degree. They tend also to be community leaders. S,. ral

have occupational backgrounds which have been resources for the Council's .ork.

the chief instance, perhaps, Is the membership of several professionals in the

Field of education. They have been a Tir( with the Quincy - Lincoln school staffs and along with these staffs, with the world of contemporary educational ideas.

While the Council has been fortunate in its human resources, its material

resources have been meagre. On December 19, the Educational Planning Title 111 projects, made $3,000 available for hiring staff. On February 21, the Quincy Schoo

Project signed a contract with the Council paying it $5,332.00 (including the

$3,000 from the School Department) for consulting services through June 30,

1969. These funds paid the Council's tho coordinators and all other expenses.

The Boston Redeveloiment Authority made 3vallable an unused building for the 25 -20-

Council, at 34 Oak Street, near the Medical Center as temporary headquarters.

Although the voting structu.e was adopted October 29, one further organiza-

tional task was not accomplished until January, 1969. At the meeting of December

2, a member suggested that the staff at the Quincy-Lincoln School district be

invited to join the Council. The proposal quickly gained majority support.There

was debate over how best to approach the school staff.To understand the Council's

concern over the proper approach, one must recall that this was the year of the

prolonged teachers' strikes in New York City and of the tragic rift between the

teacher's unioa and several New York communities. After discussion, a letter was

sent to the Commonwealth Department of Education, the district superintendent,

the Boston Teachers' Union, the district principal and the teachers, sett:ng forth

the Council's purposes and inviting membership of the district staff. There were

inform,1 meetings at the schools on the teachers' invitation. The district

principal invited the Council to make a formal presentation at a staff meeting

in January. While the teachers have not yet taken up the invitation to voting

membership on the Council, a group of eight to ten found time to meet with the

subcommittee on curriculum, and contribute; to its work. Since the new Quincy

Cchool is planned for the K through 5 age group, it is not surprising that most

of the teacher-participants came from these grade levels.The number partici-

pating was roughly half the K through 5 teaclwrs in the district.

The voting structure once settled, the Tufts delegates insistently keminded

the Council of impending deadlines. The new Quincy School was scheduled to open

its doors in 1972. There was only so much time for planning and for buildiny. A

planning document had to be submitted to the Public Facilities Department and

reviewed by the Boston School Department. The Project Staff had written a first

draft which served as a jumpins-off point for work on a Council-written document.

If the multi-use urban building conceived by the Project staff were acceptable ( to the Council, it was necessary to demonstrate its feasibility by obtaining

commitments from appropriate agencies ! rent space and staff its various compo- 2G -21-

nents. The Project Staff had explored many possibilities for obtaining these

"letters of intent" but much remained to be done.

To accomplish its tasks, the Council sprouted sub-committees.A subcommittee

on Budget and Personnel was formed early to write the Job description for Council

coordinators, to advertise the position, screen applicants, and make recommendations. Two coordinators were hired on January 23rd.

A Committee on Curriculum was formed November 18th and began meeting -- some-

times In the evening, sometimes in the afternoon at the Lincoln School for the convenience of its tea..oer-members, to discuss in broad terms the kind of education

they would like to see in the new Quincy School.

A Committee on Goals and Policy was charged with the task of defining "a continuing process" through which the community might be permanently involved in

the new Quincy School. Occasionally, it was asked to work on a specific Issue when

the full Council failed to reach consensus, e.g., to incorporate or not to incorporate.

A Recreation Committee reviewed the recreational facilities for both school and community proposed by the Protect staff for the multi-use building.

All committees wrotE reports for eventual Incorporation into a planning document. Finally, a document-writing committee took on the task of pulling the

committee reports together. For several weeks it met three or four times a week

to write. When it had produced a rough draft, this was circulated to the entire mailing list (of about 200) with requests for reactions. Several Committee meetings were held for the same purpose. The document committee then wrote the final draft,

taking account of the critiques it had received.

The Council having agreed on thecbsirability of most of the components of the multi-use building (there was real controversy only over the character of the

housing to be built) continued the work of finding agencies which would write

letters of intent to rent, staff and operate them.This involved them in dealing with the Mayor's Office aboutthe possibility of a "little City Hall" In the building; 27 -22-

with the Library Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation concern:ng

the operation of the recreational facilities; with United Day Care, United Com- munity Services and United South End Services about the projected day care center and drop-in center for children and young people, with the Educational Facilities

Administration about potential housing; with the Department of Health and Hospitals

about space for health care, and others. Most of the work of the dealing with

these agencies necessarily fell on the shoulders of the paid full-time coordinators

and Tufts Project staff. Other Council members represented the body in these

negotiations when they were able to apare the daytime hours.'

In order to gain a firsthand impression of innovative educational methods,

Council members visited a number of schools. These included the Boardman, Lewis,

the McCormack, the Fayerweather, the Bridge and other schools in greater Boston

and the two Bridges school district in New York City.

'he Council also established contacts with organizations similar to itself, most notably the South End Community Education Council and the Friends of the

Mackey School. Thirty-four Oak Street, Council headquarters, immediately 11'63-

trated the shortage of recreational space for young people in the area: they knocked on the doors to ask if they could use it. At present 34 Oak is a drop-

in center and meeting place for a club of young people. They have sanded the

floor and painted the second story room where the Council meets and where they on other evenings, have held parties.

An inside joke is often the sign that a collection of people have become a cohesive group. The Council's joke is a McCiuhanesque cliche, "The process is

the product." The Council's most tangible product Is its planning document.

'The fact thatmany community residents can do volunteer work only in the evening and that service agencies work from 9 to 5 is not a trivial obstacle to community participation in this work. For example, It is difficult for parents, especially working parents, to get to school during the day, and equally difficult for teachers, who often travel home to their families in other communities, to return to school in the evening.

28 -23- its most significant products are not tangible and may be strong or fragile -- I find it hard to judge.

First, there has developed a network of personal relationships among residents of Bay Village, Castle Square, and Chinatown communities, which although geograph- ically contiguous have not been interrelated In this way before.The likelihood is thereby increased that the three communities can and will act together on matters of common interest beyond the Council's scope.

Second, many members claim that their experiences on the Council have been

"an education". They have seen progressive educational ideas in action. They have dealt with government agencies and learned something of how they function.

It is equally true that the agencies, in dealing officially with the Council have accorded it an important degree of recognition. On matters concerning the new

Quincy School the Council Is the established spokesman for the community .

The Council's planning document is now completed. It has been sent to the

Public Facilities Department (PFD), which is responsible for the building, and the

PFD and QSCC together by mutual agreement - have selected the architects to design the community center which will have the new Quincy School as its heart. A key consideration In choosing the architects was their presumed capacity to work on a continuing basis with the Council, consulting with them and clearing designs with th,% at every step along the way. This is hardly a usual procedu:e for architects, yet both the PFD and the architects chosen seem to agree with the Council's definition of the situation: the community Isthe client and the community's wishes must be served.

The Boston School Department must pass on tLe educational plans for the new

Quincy School. They have not yet been heard from. The document asks for a procedure whereby the community may take part in tne choice of personnel, In curriculum-building and in continuing decision-making concerning the school at every level. The Council has not demanded community control. It has asked that a procedure for continuing community participation be negotiated. Nonetheless, 29 -24- these mildly phrased requests are radical. Personnel recruitment, curriculum building and the choice of pedagogical pnilosophy underlying Itsoperations are the core professional activities of tip School Department. Its response to these requests is therefore crucial - for itself as well as theCouncil.

An acute immediate problem for the QSCC Is funds.Much less lushly funded than the King-Timilty Council to begin with, both it and theTufts Planning Office have now run out of funds almost completely. Unless they can find private foundation funding at a level at least sufficient to keep afull-time staff and an office, their effectiveness is likely to dwindle drastically.

A second problem is community organization. Like the King-Timilty Council

the QSCC does not, io fact, have a very ksroad community base. This is due in part to the large number cf non-English-speaking HongKong immigrants in its

area; in part to the lack of funds for door-to-doorcommunity organizers; and

in part to the natural reluctance of hardworking, poor peoplewith little spare

time to attend meetings and invest themselves, without compensation,in such an

exotic activity as planning a new school.

In short, there exists a distinct possibility that the QSCCwill quietly

expire for lack of money three years before the Quincy SchoolComplex Is

scheduled to open. If this occurs, the hoped-for community corporation which

would coordinate the various parts of the complex in the community'sinterest will

not exist. Rather, each agency, the YMCA, the famil service agency, the day

care center, the Department of Health, and so on,will operate its facilities

independently. The School Department will open the school in routine fashion,

keeping in its own hands the control over personnel selection,curriculum,

decisions concerning the grading vs. non-grading and othereducational matters.

However, if School Department is sufficiently clumsy, it might provide

the issue which would keep the ,C alive. A flat refusal to discuss the possi-

bility of community participation in educationaldecisions, for instance, would

probably revive and expand the Council's support in the South Cove andthroughout

30 -25- the city. It may be less what the School Department does than the way that it does it which will count. The Chinese constituency of QSCC is probably more interested in results, in terms of the building and its facilities - than it Is in the ideology of community participation. Handled with due respect, they would probably agree to a compromise very satisfactory to the school bureaucracy.

The members of QSCC who are committed to community participation above all as their goal would then have lost their war. The next two years should tell.

Boston Initiatives

In 1967 the Boston School Department hired Dr. Robert Anderson of Harvard university to work under the auspices of Its Office of Program Development (since renamed the Educational Planning Center -EPC to plan three new schools for

Dorchester. The schools were among those to be built in conformity with the

Racial Imbalance Law.

Dorchester is a section of Boston which borders on Roxbury. Traditionally it has been a Jewish community. At present it Is an area in transition as the

Jewish residents move out and black residents from Roxbury increasingly move in.

As it happens the three new schools are located right at a point where an old lower middle class white community is separated by a main artery from an expanding black community. At present the black children attend the Gibson School, an all-black school which was the scene of the takeover by militants described above.

The white children attend two other schools.The three new schools to be sub- stituted for these old ones will have a racial balance, roughly of 50/50. Dr.

Anderson's strategy apparently was to plan the schools and then seek community approval for his plans. This parallels roughly what wes done by the T-NEMC

Planning Office and the result was the same.The community objected in principle to being planned for and responded by forming its own organization to develop its own plan. At present the Dorchester Steering Committee, a biracial group, has nearly completed its planning document and is getting ready to hand it over to the Boston School Department for review. 31 -26-

The Educational Planning Center nas three responsibilities: I) it monitors

Title III projectsin Boston; 2)it cooperates with local communities In planning

new schools; 3)it writes proposals for federal funds under various titles of ESEA.

The strategy of the Center is to send one of its representatives into each

neighborhood where a new school is planned either to work with existing groups or

to form a neighborhood group to plan the school. The EPC involves school staffs as well as neigl :orhood residents in the organizations. In some neighborhoods,

there is very little interest and the EPC representative is left to deed op the plan himself. In other neighborhoods there is a great deal of interest and not

infrequent factional strife over the question of who legitimately represents the

neighborhood. One EPC representative, for instance, has been assigned to the

South Cover, the South End and Dorchester. That means that he :las been the

contact with EPC for the Quincy School Community Council among other groups.

The EPC reviewed the Courcil's (Q4CC) document, recommended some changes and

passed the document on to the Boston School Superintendent with a qualified

endorsement.

In the case of another South end group, the EPC contact man is faced with

a three way factional split as to who represents the community.He is trying

to weld the factions into one group which will endorse a planning document

outlining the educational and physical characteristics of the new school to be

built in their neighborhood. In still another case an all-black community has

refused any contact with the EPC representative (who in tnis case is black)

because he comes from the Boston School Department. At present this neighborhood

has no school of its own, its two sch Is laving been mysteriously burnt down a

few years ago. The children are by ed out of the community to a white neighbor-

hood to school. There Is neer houSIng going up in the neighborhood and by next

fall there will be 500 elementary age youngsters. The eighborhood organizations

declare that they are "fed up" with bussing; that they want their own schools in

their own neighborhood; but that, at the same time, they will have no 32 -27- communication with the Boston School Department. Some of thcm claim that they wit open and run their own "Freedom Schools" next fall. In fact, this mLiv turn out to be the most militant neighborhood, most adamantly insistent on "community control" that the Boston School Department will have to deal with in the ne r future. it

Is informally reported that parents in the area are willing to keep their children home next year rather than send them to a city-run school. There are two strong organizations In the neighborhood.

The strategy of the Boston School Department in the face of demands by local parent groups for participation in personnel selection, curriculum - making and determination of pedagogical methods seems to be very much what Harold Lasswell long ago labelled "limitation by partial incorporation". In specific instances, the School Department Jr School Committee makes what appear to be surprising concessions. For Instance, their appointment of black principals not on the list; their permission to the parents of the Mackey School in the South End to plan and implement a non-graded curriculum for their children In cooperation with teachers in the school; their accession to a request from the Dorchester Steering

Coumittee than an expensive primary health care unit be included in the plans for their schools; their agreement that members of the Boardman Parents' Associa- tion could be represented on the committee which selected teachers for the new

Monroe IroAer School. In every one of these cases standard procedure HOS violated. The School Department treated them all as "special cases" - as exceptions. The Department prefers that such "exceptional" agreements be reached with a minimum of publicity cnd they seem concerned to satisfy the immediate demands of specific groups of parents without at the same time having to change any existing procedure In principle or on a city-wide basis.

Thus far, the stratcgy appears to be quite successful. It remains to be seen whether It will succeed with the demands for community participttio).The

School Committee may well kel that it can afford to Ignore these demands. The outspoken boosters of the Boston schools -- Louise Day Hicks and John Kerrigan 33 -28- each ran first in this past autumn's elections for City Council and School Com- mittee respectively.As School Committeeman Paul Tierney told a meeting of the

Boston Education Alliance, the majority o' the people of Boston seem content with their schools. Yet the existence of that Alliance -- which was formed only last summer -- is a sign that the critics of the school system are uniting to increase their strength. Already they have won a victory.They have made a study of

Special Classes in the South End of Boston which shows definitely that these classes are being used in a way which is in violation of the law -- and the

School Committee has moved to take action on this damaging report.A similarly critical document - produced the Task Force on Children out of School - claims that thousands of Puerto Rican youngsters do not attend school in Boston and that the school system does nothing about it. The charge has been c,11, aggarated"

by the School Committee but the fact that there is a problem h c a denied.

It appears likely that the Task Force will be able to force the r ol Department to take some action on this matter as well.

The School Committee, In short, Is vulnerable to pressure - matters.

However, the requests for parent participation in educational r ''ons are radical demands. They go to the heart of the functions which the ho41 Depart- ment considers to be its central responsibilities and which ast likely

to share, even in part, without a struggle. Furthermore, it i ,r that any large group of parents in Boston is prepared to fight very harQ these demands.

Community participation has its strongest support in the bla ty and even then:, the "community control" position is still a minor ;.t the present time, there are three plans for new schools written 1 fty groups which ask for parent participation in the core aspects of c c liese three - plus possibly one or two others - will reach the School Depar , bout the

same time. If the de-Ores of these commuritles are brusquely t rff'd down, and if the communities unite In rejecting the refusal, the issue of 11c1 comnJnity autonomy with respect to the character of schools may yet beco-4, n '1o, issue 34 -29- in Boston. If so, it will affect mainly the black and Puerto Rican, and possibly the Chinese communities -- backed by some activists from the universities.

At the present moment, however, it seems to me that "community control" of schools has very little future in Boston. There may well be some concessions to the black community: recruitment of more black staff members In return for an end to demands for desegregation. But there Is little or no evidence that a change of this character, or for that matter that "community control" would quickly upgrade the academic performance of segregated, low SES, black elementary schools. The evidence is largely to the contrary.

Many of the university personnel1.1 greater Boston who are interested in

Improving the area's school systems are aware of this fact. They are also aware of the politically bleak future of desegregation.As a result there is a considerable ferment of both research and action directed to finding ways to improve the edLzation of low SES schools by means as yet largely undiscovered.

35 -30-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF BOSTON

1. Racial Composition and Population Size

Size of metropolitan area 2.605.452 (1965)

Size of tha city of Boston 616.326 (1965)

Percent Negro in Metropolitan area (1960)

Percent Negro in Boston 1950 2%

1960 9.1%

1968 14%

1970(est) 16%

1980(est)

Negro as Percent of Non-white 2/"(1260)

11. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in trdcts with 95% Negro

1965

1960 _(lOX of Roxbury population lives in tracts with 95% Nonwhite)

1950

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 70% (or more) Negro

1965 1960 __RI

1950

Comments:

If more recent figures were available, they migot show much increased

percentages. Roxbury was 44% Nonwhite in 1960 and 60% Nonwhite in 1968.

36 -31-

Most Heavily Negro Social Planning Areas

District Percent Negro Density Median Family % Below ($3000) Income PovertY Level

(1168) Roxbury 60% Nonwhite 33,968 per sq. mi. $4631. 27.4%

(1960) North Dorchester 9.9% Nonwhite 25,000 per $5709. sq. mi.

(1967) "Model City Area" (Parts of Roxbury, 54% $5500. 24% (1967) No. Dorchester, and Jamaica Plain)

(1960) Washington Park Above Average (Part of Roxbury 69% for Roxbury net in Model City)

Addltional_Facts_goncerning the High Negro Density Areas:

Medan Family Income in year $5500 (estimate)

Si 4c of area Roxbury - 2 mi + No. Dorchester - s.. ml (est) = 7 sq.

mi. Model City_- 1953 Acre;

Population Roxbury - 84,924 + No. Dorchester - 112,504 197,428; Model City

52.300

Number of elementary schools in area Roxbury 24;_ Model City 23

Delinquency rate Model City - Juvenile arrests = 19% of Clty Total (50%

higher than City Averam)

Population Density Roxbury + No. Dorchester 28.204 per sq. mi.; Model

City 32 per sq. acre

School Enrollment"Enrollment in Schools in Roxbury"- 11,925

Model City 5497 Negro + 962 White =6-1459

37 -32-

Unemployment Roxbury 2272 o Dorchester 2170 (est.) Model City -

Rate - 7.2; Underemployment - 24.7

Public Welfare "Roxbury Crossing" - 12,439; Dorchester - 20,261 (Model City

has 18.2% of Boston caseload).

Income Level $5500 median

Out of School youthNadel City dropout rate 36% higher than city average.

III. Poverty levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard(1960) Model City - 50%:

No. Dorchester 12.8%; Roxbury 40.7%.

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000 Model City

24% (1967); Roxbury 21.4% (1988); No. Dorchester 16.11_0,960

Unemployment rates in the city of Boston

Date Average Negro White

1950 5.7

1960 5.8 7.8 (nonwhite)

1966 Boston Metropolitan Area (Model City) 3.4 7.2

1968 Boston Statistical Area 4.1

Comments:

No recent racial breakdown.

38 -33-

A PROFILE OF THE BOSTON SCHOOL SYFTEM

I. Size of the System

Total number of schools 192 November, 1969

No. of elementary schools 150 date November. 1969

No. of Junior Schools 17 date November, 1969

No. of Senior High Schools 19 dateNovember. 1962

No. of Special Schools 16

11. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff and Students(October, 1968)

A. Staff No.

Negro 226 4.77

Negroes In white schools (under 10% Negro 39 17.2

Negroes in Negro schools (50%+ 148 65.5 Negro & 90%+ Negro) 99 43.8

In elementary schools 133 5.18

In Senior High schools 26 2.36

Certified personnel All teachers 100%

Classroom teachers 4500 (estimate)

Ratio pupils/teachers (elem.) 24.2

(Jr. high) 25.6

(sec.) 20.2

(K) 21.8

Mean years experience (teachers) No records

% first year teachers 10%

% non-degree 1%

% B.A. 34%

% M.A. 56%

% M.A. plus 30 hours 9% 39 -34-

Salary - minimum (Bach) $7,000

maximum (Bach) 410,300

B. Students

Negro enrollmentin elementary schools:

1'c:sr No.

Negro Oct. 68 25,482 27.05

Nonwhite Oct. 68 29,674 31.5

Nonwhite Nov. 69 29,258 30.83

Nonwhite 1965 24,167 24.7

Nonwhite 1961 14,955 16.4

Number of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools:

Year No.

In schools Oct. 68 17,323 67.9 50% + Negro

In schools 8.944 35.1 90% + Negro

Comments:

40 -35-

Student Performance

Test score (date: 1969) Schools 95-100% White (Standardized) Metropolitan Achievement Negro (95-100%)

Word Word Knowledge Reading KnowledgeReeding

Grade 2 4.7 4.1 6.4 5.7

Grade 4 4.7 3.8 5.8 5.1

Grade 6 4.8 4.6 5.3 5.0

Grade 8 3.6 3.0 5.0 4.6

Stanford Reading Achievement

End of 3rd Year (None 1968; 1969 not yet compiled) End of 6th Year

C. School Board

Method of selection: Biannual Citywide Election

Number of Negroes on School Board: None

Members of the Boston Board of Education ("School Committee")

John J. Kerrigan Paul R. Tierney Joseph Lee James W. Hennigan, Jr. John J. Craven, Jr.

41 -36-

,BIBLIOGRAPHY ON BOSTON

"Individual School Report " Elementary and Secondary School Survey, Form OS /CR 102, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Office for Civil Rights, Washington, D.C., October, 1968.

Peter Schrag, Village School Downtown, Beacon Press, Boston: 1967.

Jonathan Kozol, Death at an Early Age

The Rehabilitation Planning Game

Leila Sussman, TheApincy School Community Council

Barbara Jackson, KinvlimiltY

Boston Globe

Aoolication to Dept. of Urbbn Development, 1967 for Grant to set up Model City.

42 CHAPTER 2

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

IN TIX CLEVELAND, OHIO SCHOOL SYSTEM

Introluction

While the city of Cleveland Is feeling the pressures for community decentralization, the city's school administration's view is that the Bundy Plan would

"build iron curtains around the neighborhoods and freeze the ghetto". Instead, the school system seems to be moving in t:e direction of administrative decentralization whereby school principals and schools are being given a greater degree of involvement in the decision-making process In educational administration. This does not mean Oct Cleveland is moving to administrative decentralization on a geographic or district basis, but simply one In which individual school principals will have wider lattitude in which to function within a framework of city-wide minimum standards and curricula.

Cleveland's er'(4c tionat problems are multiplied by its urban plight which in many respects Is similr to that prevailing In other cities. Residential segregation continues to increase. The city's Negro population, which is 40% of its total population, resides In city districts in which they constitute from 72% to 98% of the population. At least 25% of the housing in Negro areas Is substandard. The rate of unemployment for Negroes In 1965 was 9% while that for the white population was 2.4%.

Cleveland's school system has been moving more and more in the direction of reflecting the population changes in the city. Negro ter hers constitute 43x of the city's teaching staff, while Negro teachers in the high density Negro schools constitute 73%. Negro pupils are distributed in greater density than Negro teachers.

In the elementary schools, Negro pupils constituted 57% of the enrollment.At the same time, 92% of the segregated schools (using 80% as an index of racial predominance) consisted of Negro pupil enrollment. The reading scores of Negro pupils are not unrelated to these factcrs In that they are one full point behind white 43 -38- pupils at the 6th grade level.

In the city of Cleveland, then, we hr a a picture of community moving towards a Negro population majority, a school pupil enrollment distribution in which Negroes constitute a majority, and a school teacher distribution in which Negroes are becoming a majority. While within these urban patterns there is segregation, will school decentralization provide an educational solution?Will community control

Introduce a new variable when the city's demographic trends move towards Negro majorities? Cleveland's school administration's tentative answer is that of giving eack school greater autonomy rather than looking at autonomy within a racial framework.

Citizen Parttplpationl

Several distinct meanings are attached to the term "citizen participation" by officials in Cleveland holding different idcnlogical positions about politics and professionalism. A simple typology is suggested below fcr the purpose of placing various activities IG which the Cleveland schools are engaged:

This Section has been prepared i thetatzeof this study by Ronald G. Corwin of Ohio State University, 1969.

44 -39-

TABLE 1

PERSONS PARTICIPATING TYPE OF PARTICIPATION

Consultation Decision - Making Powers

Expert Participation ; The use of astronauts 11. and writers as speakers and consultants, the use of businessmen in planning vocational education curriculum.

Community (lay) Participation in Decision Making III. Appointed Citizen IV. Self-appointed Committees Citizens Councils: A. City-wide Elected School Boards B. Neighborhood-based Student Councils

Parent involvement in School Activities V. PTA's; projects VI. enlisting parents to help children in the MM. home.

Cleveland central administrators stress the type of participation represented

in Cell I in which businessmen and citizens are called upon to give technical expert advice, always in an advisory capacity. Where citizen committees are used, they are appointed on a city-wide basis.The city-wide representation and the selection of citizens on the basis of their expertise predisposes the system to encourage the involvement of middle-class citizens.Although it should be noted that Cleveland Is experimenting with a form of decentralization in the Glenville area -- the Glenville School Committee Project -- in which the school administration works with a community to plan for the education and other needs of children in the area. Twenty-one schools are involved in the project, reaching 24,000 children.

This is described later.

At the other extrene, the Urban Coalition Is pressuring for locally elected neighborhood school boards as represented In C IV of the above table. The 43 -40-

education task force of the Urban Coalition has pledged to try to strengthen the

opportunity for citizens to participate in their schools. The Foundation which

provides one-half of the funds for the Coalition has endorsed this objective, al-

though the superintendent reportedly will attempt to block their efforts.

Recently, the Urban CoallAton called together representatives of 35 groups

which have been constituted into five panels to consider community participation.

The panels will hear a total of 15 neighborhood forums duri,Ig the second and third weeks of September. The produce of these forums should be recommendations to the

hoard on October 15. in addition, the panels themselves are likely to continue to

function as a political force to pressure for the adoption of their proposals.

The issue of citizen participation also will be an issue in the school board election this year. A united community group has put up a slate of candidates who support neighborhood school boards.

The situation, consequently, is going to be explosive. In the past ten months four schools have been burned out; ono within recent weeks. Last year there were several outbreaks Involving dissatisfied citizens in the inner city, which closed down some schools, including John Hay, John F. Kennedy and Pawlings Schools.Also

the central administration building was taken over by black militants last spring.

The School Board's Position

The superintendent, Paul Briggs, who has been in this office since 1964, writing

in the ill nois Schools Journal (Spring, 1969) listed several recommended programs:

"A partial list of some programs that must either be established or expanded in every urban center would include: a twelve month school year, new school buildings that are attractive, functional, and flexible; bigger libraries in all schools; procedures to make the new technology available for the education of children; sex education in elementary as well as secondary schools; new services for the physically and the emotionally handicapped; vastly increased health services; large scale recreational facilities so that every child can walk to a supervised playground, gymnasium, and swimming pool; a full-scale program in nutrition including breakfast for the inner-city child; massive increases in vocational and technical courses in comprehensive high schools; new work-study opportunities; financial aid for the high school graduate who does not qualify for a scholarship but needs assistance to go to college; rehabilitation opportunities for the dropout and the potential 46 -41- dropout; new partnerships with industry as we reclaim the dropout and prepare him for today's jobs and tomorrow's; expanded follow-up for the graduate; adult education classes to combat illiteracy and to update job skills; and modern management techniques in the operation of our schools."

It Is significant that he omitted any mention of demands for community control or for reorganization. The school administration fears that the Bundy plan would

"build iron curtains around the neighborhoods and freeze the ghetto".While some observers believe that decentralization of school boundaries in the Greater Cleve- land area might be a means of achieving metropolitan desegregation, Briggs' thinking is perhaps reflected in these passages from the same article:

" A thread that must run through all efforts to improve schools is more effective communication. Parents must be more actively involved in the education of their children. Administrators, supervisors, teachers, clerical workers, and custodial employees must be aware and sensitive to the needs of people in the communities they serve. The school can no longer be an island separate from the community it serves, but must be a center of activity, Conversation, and concern for the entire community family." ...(But) "As we move toward the solution of our problems, care will be needed to avoid the empire building, community fracturing, agency competition, and duplication of services and functions that have caused the failure of so many previous projects.

If our efforts tomorrow are to be more than exercises in futility, our attention and resources must be directed at helping people solve their problems rather than dissipated in jurisdictional squabbles between agencies."

The superintendent's report did mention that "we must give our individual schools, the staff and the principals a greater degree of involvement in the process of decision making." However, the school administration believes that the problem Is to find the decisiulis wiAch principals can most effectively make.

The Cleveland system,in any event, is not moving toward any form of administrative decentralization on a geographical or district basis. The system Is presently organized into one high school district and three eiemeatary school districts, each of which has a directing principal. Administrative circles prefer a uniform curriculum In which the entire system is subject to minimum standards and similar curriculum. He maintains that teachers can go beyond the minimum, but it must be done on en individual basis, and through the introduction of more variegated 47 -42- supplies, rather than on a regional basis. There is the problem of transiency, and the problem of categorizing people within ghetto schools, some of whom could benefit by more advanced curriculum.Moreover, the administration feels that decentralization would tend to increase sectionalism and the power of ward councilmen to exert pressure on the school system. Decentralization would sharpen segregation.

Administrative members feel that decentralization might be more appropriate in a gigantic system like Ch! ago or New York, but doubts that it will work even there.

To the extent that the members of the school administration reflect the official posture of the system, it can be said that the Cleveland School System is also suspicious of most forms of citizen participation in decision making; and, even more than that, it will resist community efforts in this direction. There appears to be several reasons, or rationalizations, for this position including:

a) the belief that the professionals are better prepared to make educational decisions than are amateur laymen. it is believed that teachers will not accept control by laymen, with power to fire them arbitrarily, and will leave the system. The model implicitly used here is that of the physician prescribing treatment for the ill patient. He recognizes that there are some bad teachers but his answer is that the profession itself needs to do a better job of policing itself in order to stem the tide of public criticism.Mr. Theobold does not believe that the meetings which educators have held with local citizens committees have been productive; he feels that these meetings are dominated by extremists who are not able or ready to present feasible programs.

b) Citizen committees have tended to be coopted by a small group of un- compromising radicals who are out to destroy the system rather than to work con- structively with school officials to improve it. Moreover, Theoboid feels that very few of these radicals have children in school, and ergo the parents themselves are not pressuring for community control; and the vocal lay committees donot necessarily reflect the needs or aspirations of the community.

c) Neighborhood control Is not legal since the central board cannot 48 delegate its responsibilities in this way. It also raises questions about how the neighborhood boards could be representatively selected, and, more important, about how to finance schools in poor neighborhoods. Also, it would splinter the community even further,

d) Finally, the narrow concept of community schools controlled by parents who themselves did not have doors opened up to them will result in demands for a separate and black curriculum which will keep their chlAren from becoming better assimilated into the society.

The difference between the thinking of the school system and certain influ- ential citizen groups recently came to a head when the superintendent of schools proposed that a school-community coordinator be hired for each school in the district for the purpose of strengthening the relationships between schools and communities. Since this has since become a focal issue, it will be described briefly here. The superintendent's annual report mentions (on page 5-6) that:

"With parents we must develop a sense of partnership as they Join the planning team for the improvement of the education of their children. To implement this latest step, we shall soon recommend the appointment of an administrative assistant to the principal for community-parent relations -- a person who will be part of the community and will work with the principal actively involving all parents in the education of their children. In addition, he will coordinate activities among the schools and send children to the high school."

The school board was about to consider this proposal, with an eye toward implementing it, when a number of groups in the community,including the Urban

League and the League of Women Voters raised opposition.

The Urban Coalition's_Position

The Urban Coalition asi,ed the school Word to defer any e2cision of this issue

9ntil a series of forums could be held to identify components of a good community school program. It was maintained by the groups opposing this proposal that

(a) there are no structures at present for ascertaining whether or not the community approved the person or persons who were to be appointed In this school- community coordinator position; (b) Moreover, there are several communities in a 49 -44- particular high school district; (c) finally, and most important, it was felt that the person who held this position would become another community official acting as little more than a pipeline for complaints. It was this issue which triggered the neighborhood forum on community participation.

The Director of the Coalition believes that it is likely that the forums this month will prmducc recommendations for local school boards modeled along the lines of a bill now in Michigan which provides for the following:

(1) representatives for the central board to run on a district basis as well as representatives who run at large.

(2) the election of district school boards in addition to the central school board.

(3) a clearly spelled out division of authority between the central and district boards, giving the district boards the right to recommend all professional staff and to fire professional staff (who in turn have the right to appeal to the central board); to se:_ curriculum within broad guidelines established by the central board.

(4) The central board, however, would have final control over all budgetary matters, including the fiscal responsibilities for taxes in the community at large. The Director believes that locally elected boards would be responsible for several improvements, Including:

(a) curricula would be deeeloped that is more relevant to preparing

Inner city children to live with reality rather than simply to go to

college;

(b)the schools would be held more accountable for what happens to

the children, instead of graduating children who can read at only a

sixth grade level.

community's confidence and pride in their school would be increased;

(d)improved attitudes on the part of teachers, who will no longer 50 -45-

be shielded by Civil Service protections, and who will barn to

understand the boundaries and the limitations of professional

expertise.

The Director also sees some risks in this proposal, including:

(a) there is no assurance that the best and most representative

people will be elected to the board (he concedes that in any

democratic process it is possible that the extremists will get

control) ;

(b) community control will increase the competition among local

communities for funds;

borhood school boards as they have the the P.T.A.'s.

In any event, he predicts more outbreak, unless the school system is willing to consider the possibility of locally elected school boards.

Activities of the Clevgland School System

For sake of convenience, the activities of the Cleveland schools will be described in terms of the categories suggested in the cells of Table 1.

Expert Consultation (Type 1)

1. A large number of committees are used composed of business people who advise in the technical curriculum problems involved in vocational and technical education programs. For example, experts are called upon to advise the school system of trends in supply and demand and needed machinery for courses in data processing.

2. Technical advisors also are used extensively in a city-wide Supplementary

Education Center. Each third grade and sixth grade class in the city spend a few days at the center each year in racially mixed classrooms composed of students from various parts of the city. This year, for example, an astronaut spoke to students about the space proyram.

3. Businessmen from the community are utilized in an advisory capacity with 51 -46- a work-study program, designed to return drop-outs to school.There Is also a

related program to provide work experience for children in banks.

4. A visiting scholars program is designed to bring In welters. poets, artists and educators to talk with teachers and department chairmen for several days each. This year a Negro writer, for example, worked with teachers on black

literature. During the past year about 30 outside speakers were used. In addition, most local schools used ten to twelve outside speakers, some of whom were members of the indigenous community.

Lay Consultation_(Type III)

i. There is a city-wide Student Council which has been responsible for the adoption of a city-wide dress code, and which has made recommendations to the school board for more effective use of studentsin advisory capacities In the schools,

including provisions for working with the staff informally to communicate student concerns and grievances. The council has also proposed dropping all eligibility criteria for membership on the student council, such as grade point average.

2. All federal programs require the appointment of lay citizens' advisory committees. In total, there are 77 Advisory Citizens Committees with a total membership of 706 individuals. There is very little evidence on how these committees have been used, although It appears that some of these committees are being used in only token ways.

One exception is a city wide Parents Advisory Committee, for the pre-school and early childhood Head Start Programs appointed from parents of children In

the program, Cleveland operates a pre-kindergarten program, for Inner city target areas, a kindergarten enrichment program in 48 inner city schools, a

Summer Head Start program, and a follow through program (Pre-K through 2). The parent advisory committees are elected at the classroom level, which In turn select representatives to the city wide Advisory Council. (Details of the general structure of Head Start may be found In a booklet entitled Head Start.) Councils meet once a month. In each classroom, one day a week is devoted to parents' 52 -47- meetings. The activities vary, but reportedly crafts and paintings and slide

demonstrations are used as vehicles to discuss mutual problems. Also each parent

observes classes four times a year; over 4,000 parents visited schools last year.

One theme of the program emphasizes the "parent as educator". The activities

include: use of parents in class as volunteers (for some reason mixed with volun-

teers from the suburbs); training of parents by the research department to do

simple testing and survey work; use of bi- lingial parents as aides to work with families; a newsletter jointly edited by staff and parents; art shows exhibiting work of both parents and students, using parents as hosts and hostesses.

These Headstart participants appear to have had some influence on the program.

Reportedly (though this is difficult to believe) they urged the system to cut

Head Start class meetings for their own children from two to four days so that

twice as many children can be served. Also, the breakfast program was initiated at the suygestion of parents who felt that this was a more important meal than

lunch. They also reportedly have applied pressure on the school board and the city to get needed facilities; while many of them are critical, reportedly they have not been destructively negative about it. There has been an increase in participation in schools at a time when traditional P.T.A.'s have been dwindling; children have shown gains of more than one year In reading readiness in a sixth month period; and the recent levy received the largest mandate in the history of

the Cleveland Schools. Nevertheless, It is reported that some teachers and parents do not like the program.

Parent involvement IType V)

1. The school has published a series of bilingual teaching guides which have been sent home to parents with the hope that the parent will be better prepared

to help his children with his school work.The program, entitled "The Succeed in

School Program", consists of a series of brochures, printed in both English and

Spanish, designed to acquaint illiterate parents with the basic curriculum used

in school, the report card system and other school programs. Parents and children 53 -W- are encouraged to visit the Art Museum, Aquarium, Health Museum and Zoo and to make use of other free cultural opportunities in the city. The brrchures a:so explain how to help the kindergarten through sixth grade child at home In reading, writing and arithmetic. Catholic schools -- it. Francis on the east side and St.

Patrick's on the west side also participoLe in this program.This prnwAm is funded through the General Fund add is available to all children. The exception being that the brochures printed in the Spanish langu le arc st;II noed under

Title I.

2. English as a Second wage is being used at five public schools and two

Catholic schools. Seven itinerant teachers work with eight indiginous teacher- aides (one per school) who act as a bridge between the child's class and the home.

According to one administrator, while there is sometimes a color difference, there is always a cultural differs e. One teacher serves as a Spanish resource teacher.

This teacher obtains material to help the children keep their heritage to the extent of traveling to Puerto Rico to see the heritage first-hand. A spanish- speaking social worker who visits the homes is also included in this program.

3. Jhe Child.Devalooment Protect.This is billed as "a unique educational experience, designed to reduce the cultural gap and increase the child's readiness

to enter kindergarten successfully". i seeks to help the four year old child to develop communication skills and experiences to succeed in kindergarten. This is a weekly parent involvement so the parent becomes aware of the goals of the program. The participation of parents is reportedly excellent. Parents are also encouraged to assist In the classroom t 3 a week.

4. There Is a Volunteer Program d sigr.f to allow laymen to assist with any program. Where money Is needed, it is funded under A.D.C.

5. The Kindergarten Enrichment Protect. This program for kindergarten children In high poverty areas i,:ludes activities for parents such as classroom observation, printed materials, invitations to group activities and opportunities to assist In classrooms and on trips. 54 -49-

o. The Child-Family-Society Relationships Protect. This is a program for

5200 sixth grade pupils in 54 elementary schools, which includes a three week section on social development (i.e., relationships with family members and friends). It includes a parent education program in each school "to enable parents to understand what their pupils are learning".

7. The_Child-School-Community Relationships Project. The stated purpose of this program is to improve communication between school and community through vulouteel services of professional and non-professional adults In the community.

It aims also to assist parents to be better informPd and more competent in home and community. The program is described below.Pupils are identified by parents and classroom teachers. A coordinator meets with parents and coordinates the work of volunteers and cooperating agencies.The program is part of a Coalition among

21 elementary and secondary schools in the Glenville area. jay Participation in Decisions (Type IV)

A half dozen citizen's groups have developed around schools -- outside of the PTA's and official organs -- reflecting public dissatisfaction with the schools and deepening alienation.Among these citizen's committees are:

John Hay Concerned Parents Rawiings Supportfor Progress thtough Education Glenville School-Community Project John Marshall Committee

Also, the Cleveland Committee for Imprcved Eiucation acts as a city-wide umbrella to coordinate the efforts of these local committees.

It also should be noted that historically, Cleveland was a pioneer in the concept of area associations based on geographical regions of the city; the Hough and Glenville association in particular, continue to be active.

2. The centre) office administrators have met in community settings with committees representing American Indians and with the Spanish-American Committee for a Better Community In order to discuss education issues.Also in-service meetings have been scheduled for principals of schools having large proportions of Spanish speaking children; officials are looking for materials and speakers 55 -50- to use in their in-service training sessions.

3. Cleveland Is one of the few cities in the nation in which a group of private citizens has succeeded in getting funds from 0E0 for a second Head Start

Program operated independently of the school system.

4. Several principals in the system apparently are making special efforts to use citizens' school advisory committees. Some of Clio cchqols mentluNeri vAlich may be doing more in this respect include:

Rawlings High School Captain Roth School Washington Irving School John F. Kennedy School Mary B. Morton School Lincoln High School Glenville High School John W. Raper School

Two of these efforts were explored and will be briefly described below.

Rawlings Supporters of Pfngress_Through Education. Last spring, students of Rawlings High School walked out on a strike precipitated by the transfer of a student because he had operated a movie projector showing what school officials believed to be a "pornographic film", but one which had been endorsed by a faculty member and his assistant.The students also were demonstrating for coeducational

recreation programs during the noon hour and after school. Though violence had been threatened, the principal refused to permit poiice to enter the building.A weekend of crisis developed during which the principal solicited the assistance of several community leaders, including ministers and representatives of a social service agency called the Garden Valley Training Center for Applied Social Science.

After long discussions with these groups, they rallied behind the principal and

the school was reopened.

Rawlings Supporters of Progress Through Education is an outgrowth of this

incident. it consists of the principal, two teacher representatives, one student representative for each grade level, one parent representative for each home room and one representative of any Interested community group. The organization carri:s out projects internally and sees itself as a pressure organization vis-a-vis the 56 -51- school board. Among accomplishments claimed are:

(1) appointment of an additional assistant principal and the organization of the unit principal system;

(2) securing improvements in the school, such as new curtains in the auditorium;

(3) agreement that any teacher who wants to come to Rawlings will be assigned there, so as to get teaches who are most interested in the school;

(4) authority to hire security guards to keep out outsiders who disrupt classes.

It also has Instituted a two-day institute for new teachers, students and

their parents, at which critical issues ,:re discussed, such as : how teachers can prepare themselves to teach by understanding the community, whether teachers have different values then parents, what white teachers expect of black students and the reverse, etc. Also weekly one hour small group meetings will be held throughout the year consisting of groups of the following composition: (a) groups of five teachers, balaoced by experience and race; (b) groups of three teachers and three students, balanced by experience and grade level; (c) groups of five students balanced by grade level. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss experiences and problems, and to give each other support, suggestions and in- sight. A monthly seminar also has been proposed to discuss topics such as: discipline and punishment, school-community relations, aggression, why there isn't more learning going at Rawlings, etc. Other recommendations require that homeroom teachers visit students at least once a year during the home room periods and that more emphasis be given to selecting teachers who will work with the community.

Though still skeptical, the principal is supporting the organlzatio,.He reports that the opening week of school has been the quietest in his five years there and he sees major improvements in the noise level between classes and cleanliness in the halls. He attributes these changes partly to the assistant 57 -52- principals hired this year (secured via pressure from the Rawlings Supporters), who helped with discipline problems, and partly to the greater commitment which

teachers seem to be showing toward the school, which he feels may stem from orientation institutes and small group sessions. He also believes that the attitudes of parents -- in support of authority in general and the school in particular -- must be changed before students will be willing to commit themselves to the schoo'; the alienation and cynicism of parents carries over into the students. He feels that some of this cooperation is being elicited through the

Rawlings supporters. He notes also that the teachers seem to have more security through the Rawlings supporters and feel free to come in and talk to him about anything, which they were reluctant to do before. He is often under pressure, out recognizes that pressures may be needed to force him to consider desirable changes.

(Note: But one cannot escape noting that the original incentive for this committee was that it proved to be instrumental to the administration in its bout with students, and that it offers the means of harnessing community power to better serve the school's purposes with respect to the school board. From the principal's point of view, there are also problems inherent in this dimension of power which underlies the Rawlings Supporter.For, there is the constant threat that the organization will get out of hand. It has tended to attract some radical teachers, giving them a vehicle for power.Apparently the organization is now distributing literature espousing the advantages of violence and summarizing civil rights data showing that segregation is harmful to children. It is this dimension of the program which seems to make Cie principal cautious about the degree of support he Is willing to give it.)

Glenville Schools Project.This experimental project, originally funded by privates foundation, is the closest approximation in Cleveland to decentralization, and it seems to entail the most systematic effort to involve parents. Ai- thous) it has not been in operation since mid -1968 -- it Is being revived with a 58 -53-

grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.Twenty-one elementary and junior high

schools which feed into the Glenville High School are included in the project

and are required to participate.The director is attached to the high school

principal's office.

The focal point of activities are families, i.e., the sibs and parents of

children at various stages in their school careers.The schools, located in more

than one attendance district, cooperate on attendance and health problems of

given families. They attempt to bring about better coordination between elemen-

tary, junior and senior highs by exchanging staff and arranging for students to

observe in new schools before being promoted. (There is also a felt need for

home visitors and school social workers which the schools cannot at the present

time afford.)

There is a parallel orgamization of P.T.A.'s consisting of the leadership

of the PTA's of each of the 21 schools.A brochure has been prepared explaining

to parents how they can help their children learn and listing phone numbers of

key agencies they can contact for help with various types of problems.Also, the

cooperation among the schools seems to have congealed the cooperation of members

of this formerlyJewish community. Groups of Jewish organizations are providing

volunteers to assist with problems that have been jointly identified by them and

school officials. One volunteer organization concentrates on high achievers;

over 100 lay counselors are matched with students and provide information on

colleges and scholarships and takes students to visit prospective colleges.

Another organization concentrates on low achievers, amd is organized around the

"Big Brother" and "Big Sister" concepts.Another group emphasizes vocational

guidance, exposing high school students to various careers, including visits to

job sites.

Plans for this coming year are aimed at establishing better lines of communication between school and community. They include establishing a monthly neighbor-

hood news letter; utilizing church bulletins and mass media for informing the r public about school affairs; establishing better coordination with other community organizations for the purpose of better assisting parents with housing, health, etc.; compiling a list of community resources identifying persons and organizations in the community and what they can offer to the school as volunteers; establishing monthly meetings of principals and P.T.A. and other leaders, and a quarterly "town hall" meeting in neighborhoods to provide information on levees, new teachers, new programs, and to hear the community's side of the story; initiating informal pot-luck suppers for each home room once a year; preparing information about the school on such matters as suspension procedures to the dress code and information on drugs and sex; starting of a community theater.

There are also plans to request certain businesses to give workers time off to permit fathers to participate in school activities (as they do for jury duty).

The major problem with these programs is that teachers have been reluctant to participate in them. In particular, they do not have the time or the inclina- tion,apparently,to visit homes and work more directly with the community.

Those involved in this project are advocating decentralization of authority.

They are finding that, in order to move in the desired directions, it is necessary for principals to have more direct control over hiring than they at present have.

They now have no voice in the budget, and they only can recommend for hiring.

Principals are not seeking to influence the selection of new teachers by providing orientation programs to new teachers and to strident teachers. But they would like to have more opportdoity to recruit and to have final authority over hiring. The Glenville administrators may request that this kind of authority be delegated to principals. Yet, while it is possible that the central administration would entertain the proposal, the prospects are very uncertain.

There seem to be several assumptions behind this project.One is that there is a latent concern among members of the community to participate in schools, which normally lies beneath the surface, but which becomes manifest in a negative way during crises. This project, then, Is designed to provide more positive 60 -55- channels of participation. It is pointed out that schools traditionally have called upon the local community for support only during the times of bond issues and seldom have been willing to share with them their problems or the opportunity to participate in their solutions.

A second assumption is actually an extension of the first, namely, that once parents are well informed, they will consider themselves to be partners in the school. Hence, not only will they be unswayed by a few people out to destroy the system, but further, they will become ardent supporters of the school and apply direct pressures on the school board in support of the local school. (In other words, the program is aimed partially at cooptinq the fence straddlers and at channeling their potential political influence.)

A third assumption is more pedagogical. Attitudes of parents are seen as

Important determinants of how the child learns. It is felt that children must be encouraged at home and will not get encouragement if parents do not respect or understand the school, if they feel alienated and if they are ignorant of what they can do to help.

Finally, there is some suggestion that the school might be better able to accomplish its own objectives if the school were to assume a more central role in coordinating community agencies and helping parents to solve their more basic problems of housing, unemployment, etc.

(It is not clear which of these presumptions predominate in this case.

However, reading between the lines, there seems to be a strong com.lnent of

"parent education" together with a sophisticated emphasis on public relations.

It is possible that parental participation Is seen as a vehicle for not only coopting parents but for explaining the improvements which schools have made and demonstrating the school's concern for, and competence to deal with its problems.)

While parents have had some leluences on policy -- the volunteer program came out of a school-community committee -- the officials in charge of the project 61 -56- do not see it developing into local school boards or other forms of community control. Rather, they are convinced that, while parents want to be heard, they do not want the responsibility that goes with control; i.e., they do not want to hire and fire teachers or determine curriculum. Insofar as parents use their power, it is felt, it will be in the form of pressures on the school, and more preferably on the school board, to get the kinds of facilities and support which professional educators need to solve their problems.

Other Instructional Programs

There are several programs funded by Title I which, though not directly relevant, can be noted:1

tamping protect in the fall gave selected city sixth graders a chance to spend a week living in the kind of setting they have known only in books.

Extended school daV_Pogram keeps 18 elementary schools open for an extra hour, five days a week, with supervised study and recreation activities.

Staff development provides continuing work-shops and in-service training for inner-city teachers, with two centralized display and distribution centers for new materials.

School supplies are furnished at no cost to needy youngsters so everyone has weekly current events papers, workbooks, crayons, paints, pencils, gym shoes, and miscellaneous small supplies that more affluent parents have no trouble providing.

Reading improvement service, in its second year, depends on the very special service of 20 teachers who la3t year were relieved of all regular teaching duties and were retrained as reading specialists.

Child development at 40 locations offer a semester of preschool

training to some 1,600 41-year-olds before they enter kindergarten, with strong emphasis on parent involvement.

'From the National Elementary Principal, Vol. MI, No. 3, January, 1967. -57-

new this year, stays with those who were In pre- schools or summer Head Start, and will help to guarantee that diagnosed health, speech, and adjustment problems will be cared for.

Free Breakfast Program. Initiation of the free breakfast program for over

27,000 children focused national attention on the Cleveland schools. Regular attendance In the inner-city schools, a persistent problem, was alleviated by

10 percent In those 29 elementary schools now participating in the free breakfast program. As equipment and a method of preparing lunches becomes available, the hot lunch program as offered in all secondary schools will be expanded. The system is experimenting with frozen lunches to be heated in special ovens at the school.

School Integration

"In 1960, greater Cleveland earned the distinction of being the most segregated community In America, in the sense of containment of non-whites within the central city. In the nine years following the Supreme Court's historic decision that separate is not equal in education, the percentage of Negro pupils attending totally segregated public schools In Cleveland more than quadrupled."1

Nelohbutood School policy

Since assuming leadership of the Cleveland school system in 1964, Superin- tendent Briggs has imaginatively and arduously labored for "neighborhood" school policy, stating that use of bus transportation of pupils to increase integration is "logistically impossible", referring to Cleveland's inadequate nstwork of streets. "The best way to get the Negro out of the ghetto is to give him the tools -- a good education," according to Dr. Briggs. "Does raising of the total system thereby provide an adequate education for the ghettoized Negro?"

The "neighborhood school" concept of education is the plan of operation in

Cleveland and has the continuing support of the Board of Education and the

Ilims, February 9, 1968. 63 -58-

Superintendent. Superintendent Briggs stated In his first report to the Board of Education, "I have concluded that where segregation exists in some of the

Cleveland schools, this has not been by intentional design of the Cleveland Public

Schools."

A Policy Statement from the Board of Education to eliminateAtfacto segregation Is one of the most Important steps taken in the school systems studied.

Racial Isolation In the Cleveland Public Schools states: "The Policy Statement on Human Relations, adopted by the Cleveland Board of Education, July 26, 1966,

is a theoretical resolution and Inadequate in light of the problems and consequences of segregation in Cleveland."

PACE

In the greater Cleveland area, the PACE Association has been working on a program with six suburban systems In an attempt to encourage Integrated educational

experiences. PACE, at first, approached each suburban system about adopting a policy on integration with only Cleveland Heights affirmatively responding.Two

schools in the suburban systems participated In a compulsory course on Human

Relations for all teachers lasy year. PACE is also promoting active recruitment of Negro teachers for the suburbs and has created a course In Human Relations using

films such as "Raisin in the Sun", television tapes, etc. for presentation and discussion in suburban schools. Encouraged by the success of the program last

fall, PACE Is currently seeking funds to continue and expand the program to 25 more school districts by September, 1969.

Supplementary Centers

Centers which draw from a wide area are being used to deal with racial iso-

lation. It is hoped that If expanded Into so-called "magnet schools" and

"educational parks.", and Include a majority of the city's school children, they will provide a transition step toward full Integration.However, they are limited

in Cleveland's program at present.

64 65 -59- Lwaj:IJALIcay.i-ho

In September, 1966, Superintendent Briggs stated In his report :o the Board of Education, "We shall develop a model high quality city-wide Integrated high school ..." This plan has been developed but construction activity has not materialized because of the unavailability of funds.

Supplementary LearnlnQ Center

Initially financed with $343,916. from Title III funds under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, this center's function Is to provide at a central location, services that cannot be found at any neighborhood school and to create a new kind of program that will bring together public and parochial school pupils of all races and backgrounds and educational experience.

In its first year of operation, all the sixth grade children from the Cleve- land School District, public androchial, visited the Center on two separate days. This year the program was expanded to Include all third graders and a music program for all fifth graders is currently being planned for next year. According to the brochure, the Supplementary Learning Center combines racial integration as well as education enrichment.As the children from different sections of the city arrive at the center, they number off and move through the center In their newly formed "mixed" groups. The same schools are paired at the second visit.

In the past, the children have been free to reunite with their classmates at the lunch period, thereby losing the opportunity to add further meaning and depth to the integrated experience.Therefore, the director and coordinators of the programs have decided to continue the number grouping through the h'nch period, utilizing a simple human experience to promote better understanding.

One floor Is devoted to science, with a small planetarium as its centerpiece.

Exhibits ring the area, and there are classrooms for small demonstrations.

On another floor is a "heritage of Cleveland" center. Here is a mock-up of a country store, complete with cracker barrel. And there, the inside of a log cabin. There Is a city map big enough for a child to walk on. 60 -60- On its top floor is a very elegant restaurant. Twice a week, six of the children visiting the Supplementary Center are luncheon guests of a prominent

Cleveland civic leader or businessman at the new Erieview Plaza, a 38-story office building.

Other floors are being leveioped for music and art. The music project, pioneered during the summer, involves small classes taught by members of the

Cleveland Composers Guild, concerts by various ensembles and small group and

Individual instruction.

Textbooks

Superintendent Briggs has remarked on the lack of commercially prepared textbooks depicting the pluralistic nature of our society. Many of the materials now used in Cleveland have been written by the Cleveland staff.The League of

Women Voters has been critical of the textbooks, and point out that ti,e, basic reading materials used in the Cleveland system have not been changed In approxi- matey fourteen years, and that publishers did not begin printing integrated material before this time. Since then many major textbook publishers have produced materials which carry the Integration massage including integrated re- visions of materials used in Cleveland. The League Is especially critical of the fact that Cleveland attempts to answer demands for use of integrated teaching materials by the use of supplementary materials. These supplementary materials are not made available to every child as cre be$ic materials, and their use Is left to the discretion of teachers and principals.

An example of Cleveland's approach to the problem Is the recently developed elementary spelling series whose message of integration is carried to the pupil via minute illustrations of white and brown faces.

There are plans underway to bring into the Cleveland curriculum at the fifth, eighth, and eleventh grade levels, instruction on the history of the Negro In

America In the Social Studies. Cleveland has developed its own material and Is now looking for a publisher.The LWV report notes that it is questionable that -61- a text written for fifth graders can be used effectively Ly eleventh graders or vice versa, but this is the Cleveland system's present solution to the use of integrated text books.

In-Service Training.

A League of Women Voters' report recently concluded that there are no special courses for training inner-city teachers by the Board of Education. Local schOols, whether they are in the inner-city or in the advantaged areas, hold their own classes or meetings. The length of these meetings is controlled by union rates

(The Cleveland Teachers' Union and the Custodians' Union).At the end of the stipulated union time, the teacher way leave even though the meeting may not be over. At 4:30 everyone must leave, including the principal, for the Custodian's

Union rule states that a building must be locked at 4:30 p.m.

In-service training courses have been made available to all the employees of the Cleveland Public Schools to improve their awareness of the changing requirements for working in an urban school system.These courses are not mandatory so that 0.1 most timely courses, for example - Black History, may be virtually unattended becausg! of lack of teacher interest.

Cleveland is still losing teachers -- new, good and poor.The primary reasons are overcrowded classrooms (with little relief In the future for some areas), lack of updated books and supplies, the attitude of some principals and administrators.

Cievdand is beginning to see e new trend -- young principals resigning due to the fact they do not have strong unions and must satisfy conflicting demands from downtown, unions, parents and comrunity,

67 -62-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF CLEVELAND

I. Racial Composition andRoPulation_Sixe

Size of metropolitan area 2 million (11th largest in

Size of the city of Cleveland 81_0..000 ((100.000 fewer than in 1552)

Percent Negro In Metropolitan area

Percent Negro In Cleveland - 1950

1965

1970 (est) 40% - 300.000

Hegro as Percent of Non -white 99.1%

II. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 95% Negro

1965 __5:21.

1950 33%

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 704 Negro

/965 85%

1950

Comments:

Total segregation increase from 1910-1930 and has remained

stable. School age population is slightly more segregated than older

ages. At all Income levels, white families are segregated from non-

white families.

68 -63-

Eight Most Heavilv_Negyo social Planning Areas. 1965

District Percent Negro Density Median Family % Below income Poverty Level

Hough 88% 45.8 6117. 38.9

Glenville 94% 34.5 5085. 20.9

Central East 95% 31.8 2984. 32.0

Central 98% 21.0 - 29.6

Central West 80% 14.8 3966. 47.3

Kinsman 72% 16.0 3887. 39.9

Mt. Pleasant 89% - 6513. 15.7

Lee Miles 72% - - -

Additional Facts Concerning the High Negro Dens_lty_Areas:

Median Family income in year - 1964 - 0.050 (4400 families below poverty_level)

Size of area Six square miles

Population 60.000 - Complete turnover since 1940 _population more than

doubled during the decade of the 19501s.

Number of elementary schools in area 10 elementary schools serve the area. 7 of

them built since 1954.

Delinquency rate up 300% s1101110

Population Density Almost 100% greater than 411Y as a whole - 45.8 people per

acre and 2i times greater than Kinsman

School EnrollmentUp more than 10 since 1950

UnemploymentSame as cltkLUZ,+Ornore than 200%_of city rate in 1967.

Public Welfare up 700% since 1950 in both number of cases and proportion of

total expended InAtyllend

Income Level Down 12% since 1968 while for city askAple up 18%.

Out of school youth Rote 200% greater than city average) 69 -64-

III. Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing In Negro areas substandard - In most of the Negro areas

at least of housing is substandard. In Central the figure Is 60%.

Percentage of families in Negro areas with Incomes below $3000 - At least

one-fourth of the families in Negro areas had incomes below $31196000.li0

and had less than an 8th grade education' in Central the fl ures were both

one-half.

Unemployment Rates in the City of Cleveland:

Date Average 14.19122 White

July, 1965 5.4% 8.9% 2.4%

July, 1.864 6.8% -

July, 1960 7.6% 9-18%

Comments: The City of Cleveland was listed among major cities with sub-

stantial proportions of persistent unemployment until June,

1965 when employment conditit ds Improved.

70 -65-

A PROFILE OF THE CLFVELAND SCHOOL SYSTEM

1. Size of the System

Total number of schools 180 date 1969

No. of elementary schools 135 date 1965

No. of Junior schools 21 date 1965

No. of Senior High schools 13 date 1965

No. of students 151,+ 0(j9 date, 1262_

II. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff and Sti,dents

A. Staff

No.

Negro Teachers 43%

Negroes in white schools

Negroes In Negro schools 73X

In elementary schools 78X

In Senior High schools 53X

Certified personnel 5,915

Classroom teachers 5,270

Ratio pup!is/teachers (elem.) 10.7

(sec.) 26.3

Mtan years experience (teachers) 8 6

% first year teachers 10.3

% non-degree

% 8.A. 63.6

% M.A.

71 -66-

Salary - m!nimum (Bach) ____A6259,_

maximum (Bach) $7600.

Note: The beginning teaching salaries are higher than in the surrounding school systems listed, with one exception. This higher rate of pay, however, does not continue as the teacher gains experience, so that many teachers are lost to the Cleveland system.

B. Students

Negro enrollment in elementary schools:

Year No.

1952 25X

1963 54%

1969 57%*

*Note: Non-white school age population is 34%, but 2/5% of the whites send children to private schools.

Number of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools:

Year .124

1952 16,000

1963 44,500

Comments:

92% of Cleveland's public school puplis are attending segregated white or

Negro schools (using 80% as the index of racial predominance).

Of 94,000 elementary students, 34,770 attend schools with a population 95 to 100% wIlite, and 50,379 attend sch,ols with a population of 95 to 100%

Negro.

Between 1553 and 1965 - 27 schools were built; all of which opened with predominantly Negro or White student bodies. 72 -67-

Student Performance

Test Score (date: 1965 ) Schools 95-100% White Standardized Negro

Grade 2 97.6 105.9

Grade 4 91.4 100.5

Grade 6 90.1 97.7

Grade 8 92.6 103.1

Stanford Reading Achievement

End of 3rd Year 3.4 4.3

End of 6th Year 6.4 7.5

C. School Board

Method of selection: The Cleveland School Board 13 ele:tdd at large.

Number of Negroes on School Board: There are oresently two Negroes on the board,

neither of whom live in the inner city, lower class neighborhoods. At

least one of the Negroes, however, reportedly tries to work for inner city

citizens.

Members of the Cleveland Board of Education

Daniel O. Corrigan, President George Dobrea 1380 East Sixth Street One Terminal Tower Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Attorney, Corrigan and Gill Vice-President, Saunders, Stiver & Co.

Arnold R. Pinkney, Vice-President Joseph M. Gallagher 2131 FalrhIll Road 1380 East Sixth Street Cleveland, Ohio 44116 Cleveland, Ohio 44114 President, Plnkney-Perry Ins. Co. Aide to Congressman Michael A. Feighan

William F. Boyd Mrs. Edna C. Shalala 1005 East Boulevard 9412 Madison Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44108 Cleveland, Ohio 44102 Funeral Director, E.F. Boyd & Sons Engaged In the general practice of law. Hugh Calkins 1750 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Lawyer, Jones. Day Co,:kley & Reavie 73 74 _68-

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON CLEVELAND

U.S. Civil Rights Commission, Hearings for Cleveland, April, 1966, Supt. of Documents, No. CR1,8:059

Cleveland Public Schools Bulletin 1967 (weekly)

The League of Women Voters of Cleveland, "Cleveland Public School Study (DHR)", May, 1968, mimeo

Richau, Willird, Racial Isolation in the Public Schools, sponsored by U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1967 ( A copy of the study has not been located).

Briggs, Paul W., "Thoughts One Year Later", Illinois Schools Journal, Vol. 49, Spring, 1969, op. 28-37.

DEA, Research Report, "Survey of School Personnel", Vol. XXI, July, 1967.

DEA, Research Report, "Economic Survey of Ohio School Teachers", Vol. XXII, Octo- ber, 1968.

Taeuber, Karl E., "Population Distribution and Residential Segregation in Cleveland" 1966 (A special report prepared for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights).

Files on decentralization are available at GEA and at the Cleveland League of Women Voters

14***-kleirk

"Bibliography: Decentralization", compiled by Dorothy Christiansen, April, 1968 Center for Urban Education (includes chronological listing of Articles from New York Times.)

Brain, George, "Progress Report, School District Organization and the Big Cities", October, 1967 (Dr. Brain is Dean, College of Education, Washington State University and was head of Ohio Big City Study which was part of State Education Department's School Org. Study).

Cronin, Joseph, "The Board of Education in the 'Great Cities', 1890-1964", Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1965.

Cunningham, Lavern a.td Ray O. Nystrand, Citizen Partici_aa_tion htikhooi Affairs: A Report to the Urban Coalition, 1969

Summary of team evaluations of school-community relations in 13 cities. Includes short summaries by city: Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Duluth, Huntsville, Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia, Rochester, Rockford, San Francisco.

Fusco, Gene, SchoolHome Partnership in Depressed Urban Neighborhood, USDHEW (GRO, 1964).

Describes programs in schools serving five large urban school districts in 1964: Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia and St. Louis. -69-

Howells, Paul K. "Professional and Lay Participation in the Central Administration of Ohio's City and Exempted Village School Systems", O.S.U. (Ph.D. Disser- tation) ,1956.

Gorden, Edmund W. & Dorsey Wilkerson, CompensatorEducation for the Disadvantaged, College Entrance Exam Board, 1966

An inventory of specific programs. Included a (superficial treatment) section of community involvement and school-home-parent relations (pp. 86-121).

Johnson, Carroll F. and Michael D. Usden, Decentralization and Racial Integration, Teachers College, 1968.

12 essays - see"contents"of p. vii-viii.

" Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders.; Education Section, pp. 424-456. Bantam (paper) 1968.

Weinberg, Meyer, Integrated Education: A Reader, Free Press, 1968.

Reprint of articles on desegregation, including articles on the Allen Report (NYC), Survey of California schools, a parents' committee in NYC, biLlio- graphies.

75 CHAPTER 3

NARTIAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION IN PHILADELPHIA

Introduction

Philadelphia is a city In which within a twenty year period, the proportion of Negro population hes nearly doubled.The 1970 estimated percentage of Negro population Is at a level of nearly one-third or 31 per cent. U. employment for

Negroes Is high. In 1968 it was at the 6 per cent level. In the areas of the city in which the Negro population Is concentrated, 27% of the housing is substandard. in these eight areas of the city, six have a median family Income of below $5000 a year. Two of these areas have a median family Income below

$4000. a year.About 2/3 of the total Negro population is concentrated in census

tracts In which the Negro population Is at 70 per cent or more.

These densely concentrated Nelro areas of the city supply about 60X of the pupils in the Philadelphia School System. This same school system is served by about a one-third (33%) Negro staff. In those city schools which have dense concentrations of Negro pupils, Negroes constitute 49% of the staff. Philadelphia presentia pattern similar to other cities of dense concentrates Negro areas for housing and schooling of its population, although this concentration is not as dense as that of the city of Washington, D.C.

Ihs.Communitv School

Concern for the city school system cams to the forefront in 1966.A coalition

of businessmen, concerned civic groups and civil rights leaders elected a reform

Board of Education in that yens. The new Board immediately undertook the development of Improved relationships between itself, its administrative staff, and the community. The view adopted by the Board was that the school system needs the community In order to remain viable and become more effective. The new Board

expressed an Interest in further community involvement and the end result wasa

set of policies the Board adopted with the opening up of the way for greater

76 -71- community participation in school affairs. It also expressed itself as concerned with a greater responsiveness to community demands.

The Philadelphia School System has moved to a partial administrative decen-

tralization through a further centralization of the system's decision-making process. The Board adopted the Idea of the "community school" by reorganizing four such schools with Title 114 funds.These four schools were placed on after- hour, year round use of the school plant. Guidelines for the school nrogram were prepared in close cooperation with local civic groups and local advisory councils were established to oversee and plan these activities. This initial movement for local participation emphasized that the local school community use Its schools more effectively, that it not participate in the daily (!lr..cula life of the selool,

Model School District

Another adventure into community control by the Philadelphia School Systemwas a proposal for a model school district. The concept involved re-enforcing the

Board's commitment to work more closely with the community and meeting still another commitment to work with local universities in formulating new approaches

or urban schools. The schools serving the model school district were to be placed under the direction of an educator who would be given wide !attitude in developing heavy representation for the community.Under this plan, a Philadelphia university would Join in operating these schools. The Board, In this program, adopted the following policy - "decentralization of responsibility and authority Is proposed within the bound of legal limitations".

With the establishment of the model school district, the problem of its relationship to the Board of Education came to the forefront. The School Super- intendent took a leading position in defining the issues.He viewed the whole question of urban education as an Issue in the degree of responsibility which can be demanded of a bureaucracy. His concept of responsibility is one In which the school must be responsive to the needs of children, teachers, principals, and the community at large.The Superintendent emphasized the view of a need for 77 -72- greater teacher and principal involvement, plus that of the community, the students, and the need for building community participation into the entire system.

The guidelines developed for the model school district were that it emphasized community involvement, have its own administrative head, serve some part of North Philadelphia, and operate within the context of the Board's capital and operating budget.The program adopted for these schools involved the following specific proposals; the purpose of all programs were to be quality education; an emphasis on basic skills construction; tailoring to fit the individual; self -image and self-understanding to be stressed; experiences designed to show how to "exercise freedom"; I.Q. tests never used to determine potential; community resources used as part of school program; pupils and parents to find final counseling decisions; university resources to be used; and urban life to be stressed in curriculum and teachers.

:n the choice of a Superintendent for the model school district, the following criteria were stressed; the high ability to handle human relations; an established and well-known educator; and an individJal who was a Negro with a record as an innovator. In addition, the Youth Advisory Council, A Teachers Advisory

Council and a Business Advisory Coune'l were to be among the groups proposed for operation within the model school district.

These proposals were supported by the school Superintendent, but opposition to them became increasingly strong. Two especially difficult problems were the proposal to Include'Center City schools under the program.These proposnis were unanimously rejected by all school-community groups in Center City.The grounds given were rot racial, but clearly the factors at work were the feelings which developed about a possible threat of inundation within North Philadelphia schools.

The Model School District plan also thwarted Center City efforts on behalf of smaller scale schools to service their own growing needs. In addition, many

Center City groups raised such issues as that they were identified with other areas to the South; that there would be difficult transportation problems; 78 -73- emphasized the problems of concurrent admission of large nu .bers of black pupils into Center City schools.They all raised the issue that they had not been involved In the planning efforts. Other arguments were raised by the North City

Congress, that what was being talked about was evolutionary educational processes, but that the black community itself wanted revolutionary change and with change, control; that there was a need for the Superintendent to clarify his views on community participation and on the goals of the school district; that there was a need to define quality education and a need for detailed suggestioAs for change and improvement; and that there was a need for overall changes in school affairs and without system-wide changes local district changes would be difficult to achieve.

In addition to these loeal community arguments, the Board of Education itself came to the conclusion that It was unprepared to meet Its proposals, and that the model school district report did not have top priority In the minds of the School Board members. The result of all this was that the school Superinten- dent recommended putting the report aside and demioping a new approach to the model school district idea.With this, the Superintendent and his ataff turned again to administrative efforts to bring about roughly similar goals.

School Advisory Committees

The Philadelphia School system has used the device of school advisory committees as its approach to community participation at the school level. It has become a popular device for extending committee participation twortunities In schools throughout the city.At present, It is estimated that some 39 such committees exist, many of them having been formed in the post several leers.

Now every district has some schools with school advisory committees. The advisory committee includes parents (frequently home and school repeesentatives), and also business, professional, clerical and community organization representatives who have been interested in the local schools. The reason for their formation are varied, and no common model exists to explain their composition and powers. 79 -74-

Some have arisen in the wake of community confrontations, others have arisen in an effort to induce business interests In the local school and to provide Job opportunities for their school children.At times, principals have taken the

Initiative in creating these grovs for building constructive rather than hostile relationships in their communities. At other times, advisory committees have been self-appointed for the purpose of effecting program changes in the schools. or to challenge the principal or other personnel and effect their removal.

No formal gu!ddines exist to govern the makeup of the advisory committees or the methods they must use to assure their continuing representation. Each committee operates on a separately conceived and organized basis.As a matter of fact, the Board of Education has not taken any position or developed any administrative policy as to the legitimacy of these committees within the school system.

The specific functions of these committees within the school have been left to whatever arrangements are worked out between the principal and the advisory committee. The use of the advisory committee on this decentralized basis has been spreading not only In Philadelphia, but in other cities as well.

A Community Free School

As a result of the activities of a group of Negro parents in West Philadelphia, a movement began which, in essence, has resulted In the decentralization of a high school. The Negro parents were concerned with overcrowding In one of the

West Philadelphia Senior Nigh Schools and in the development of a more effective educational program. They brought their concerns to the Philadelphia Board of

Education and the nearby University of Pennsylvania.Among their concerns was the low scores of their children in the acquisition of basic educational 'tools and knowledge, AS well as their tack of interest in school. The parents expressed an interest In an educational program which would excite the children and motivate them In attaining college board scores which would admit them to a college education on an equivalent level with other students.

80 -75-

The approach to the problem of overcrowding in this high school has been made alcng the lines of emptying out of it perhaps half of its 5000 students.

This Is to be done by the school system acquiring a number of the residential houses In the immediate area of the school. Each house will contain no more than

200 students and each house will be a school In itself. The school system in acquiring these buildings will also maintain them, and the students will contribute by helping to paint the inside of the houses rnd naming each house according to their wishes. Each house will have a head teacher and six other teachers covering the basic subjects offered In the present high school.

The educational program will be ungraded and In this way, eliminate the grades traditionally known as 10,11 and 12. This will provide a means for individualized instruction.The program itself will be divided into two parts: the first part will behe basic program studied in the "hm:3es". This will be done in regular classes by tha assigned teachers with the assistance of teacher aides and community aides. The second part of the program will be carriedon in the community and In the high school building for electives and enrichment. In the houses, the students will work on mastering basic tools, and studying the required subjects of literature, social studies, mathematics, and foreign languages.The student will also carry on his work outside the house In "natural laboratories", in the community provided by work assignments in banks, railroads, industries, and city institutions. For enrichment and elective studies, the program will use some of its existing school system projects which are utilizing community institutions such as universities and museums.Students will continue to use the auditorium, gymnasium, science laboratories and iihrary of the present high school.

The present high school will become both a resource center and also continue to be the classroom center for about half of the present school ponutation. Shuttle busses will provide transportation for the students so they can move freely around the community. The program alms to have 50 per cent of the student's day spent away from the "house". 81 -76-

The concept of "house" organization involves the objectives of providing a relatively small number of pupils with a personal and intimate atmosphere and one of creating a sense of belonging to an entity which they come to conceive as their own. The ungraded program concept provides the pupils the chance to learn at their own rate and to receive extra help that they may need In areas where they have special problems. This program will be so organized so as to provide those pupils who are interested with a preparatory program for college entrance examinations.

The students for the "house" program will'1.4i sleeted by the principal and the advisory school committee. Selection of leachers will be decided by the advisory community committee, a member of the high school, and the director of the proyram. It is also visualized that the "houses" will have no particular routine set of hours as in traditional high schools. it is planned to keep the houses open at all times so that both pupils and teachers may feel free to come and go as they please. Teachers will be free to rearrange their classroom programs in terms of their personal Interests, but at the same time, one of the criteria being used for their selection is their unconcern with traditional school teaching hours, but with a concern for a high commitment and devotion to teaching and to an unconcern with the number of hours a week they may end up working.

Another principle which it is hoped to introduce into the overall program

Is that through participation on the part of teachers and students in planning thols atak,o1 program And their out-of-"house" program, it will produce the excitement and motivation which now constitutes a barrier to many of these pupils for competent perfonnancp and for the continuation of their education.

The Saturday Review pointed out, "The provision of alternatives to large numbers of people opens the possibility of creative use of talent and the implementation of reforms presently inhibited by the organizational needs of schools as they are presently constituted." The Philadelphia Free Community School con- 82 -77-

cept provides another alternative to the traditional approach to high school

teaching and it Is an approach which has the potential of increasing the competi-

tive spirit for alternatives on the part of school systems.

The Pennsylvania University faculty was asked by its administration for volun-

tary participation in the development of supplementary elective, enrichment courses. Such courses could involve from one to ten students meeting one hour per week or several hours each week.The University was interested in a flexible approach to the program. Faculty members are being encouraged to develop their own curriculum in a format suiting their interests, either academic or personal, and time available.

The University registrar is arranging to schedule classroom space for individual faculty members at their request on an as-available basis for courses which

they wish to teach. If laboratories, seminar roc libraries, or other special facilities under the jurisdiction of individual departments are needed, these are being made available siAject to the approval of the departmental chairman.

A special "catalogue" of course offerings will be prepared each year and the students in the Community Free School will be able to select from among those offered.

The Philadelphia school system, then, has approached the Issues of participation and school decentralization from a number of vantage points. It is not engaged in developing one answer. in a sense, it is experimenting with a number of possible answers. All of these, It should be noted, are under varying degrees of administrative control of the central administration of the Philadelphia school system. They also Involve varying degrees of parental participation. School decentralization in Philadelphia does not mean, as it now stands, an autonomous school district within a school district.As one example - the Community Free

School concept in West Philadelphia - means to the community parents an idea which promises more effective teaching and learning. They are less concerned

83 -78er with autonomous school decentralization; they are much more concerned with moving their children onto a successful ladder in which they can compete with white children on college entrance examinations.

An experiment such as the West Philadelphia high school one, would be more meaningful, if at the same time, a highly competent evaluation research project had been established at its very beginning so that at the end of a three year period or so, the school system would have a much better idea as to what was happening to the experiment and what changes, If any, were needed for its

Improvement. Of course, there will be one basic measure of evaluation which the parents are especially interestel ini and that is, how many of these children from the experiment enter college, and staythere.

84 -79-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

1. Racial Composition and Population Size/

Size of metropolitan area 4,342.897_0960)

Size of the city of Philadelphia 2.002.512 (1960)

Percent Negro in Metropolitan area 15.46

Percent Negro in Philadelphia: 1950 18.15

1965 26.43,(1960)

1970 (est) 31.39 (7/1/67) Non-whites*

1980 (est)

Negro as Percent of Non-White 98.92 (1980)

II. Racial Distribution2

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 95% Negro

1965 24.08% (1960)

1950 16.24%

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 70% Negro

1965 66.23% (1$60)

1950 49.07%

Comments:

* Population estimates by race are not available.However, population

estimates computed by the U.S. Bureau of Census gives White-Nonwhite

composition.

85 -80-

Eight Most Heavily Negro Social planning Areas3

District Percent Negro Density Median Family % Below income Poverty Level

Planning Analysis Subsections

1. E3 91.34 201 per Acre $3972.

2. D3 82.23 138 " $4083.

3. El 67.86 163 " 11 $2890.

4. D5 61.10 126 " If $5450.

5. D2 5729 112 " " $5375.

6. B2 54.61 182 " II $4525.

7. E2 46.33 180 " is $4175.

8. F2 39.26 137 " $4920.

A4dIAIonat Facts Aopcerning the titAb_HggEogensItY Areas:4

Median Family income In year $4557.

Size of area 4152_.6 Residential Acres

Population 649.834

Number of elementary schools in area

Delinquency rate Not available

Population density 156 per residential acre

School Enrollment 135.700

Unemployment 961-0 860)

Public Welfare Not available

Income Level Not available

Out of School Youth Not available

86 -81-

III. Poverty Levels5

Percentage of housing in Negrr areas substandard 27.0%

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000

Not available

Unemployment rates in the City of Philadelphia:

Date Average Negro White

1968* 3.9% 6.1% 2.9% (Non - white)

1960** 6.5% 10.7X 5.0% (Non-white)

Comments:

* The Information was gathered from a Press Release on March 6,

1969 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C., entitled

"Unemployment Rate Declines in 20 Largest Urban Areas in the U.S.

in 1968."

** Philadelphia City Planning Commission, December, 1966, Public

Information Bulletin 11, Recent Historial Trends.

87 WISTO.-10774-4

-82-

FOOTNOTES

I. Racial Composition - Most of the population estimates by the U. S. Bureau of Census do not give details by race. However, the provisional estimate as on July I, 1967 presents data by color.Hence the estimate of 7/1/67 is of nonwhite and white population and the figures shown are percent nonwhite in Philadelphia on 7/1/67.

2. Racial Distribution - Figuresfor 1965 are not available. Hence figures for 1960 are presented.They are based on the Census reports.

3. Eight Most Heavity_gegro Social Planning Areas:

The Philadelphia City ?tanning Commission has a social planning section andthis section deals with the social data.The term used for an area is Planning Analysis Section rather than Social Planning'Area. There are 12 Planning Analysis Sections in Philadelphia and these 12 sections are divided into 38 subsections. The details about these areas are available by color and not by race.

The information about eight heavily Negro populated areas are collect as follows:

(a) Eight planning Analysis Subsections (out of 38) which have the heaviest Negro concentration were selected. These subsections have certain number of census tracts and the population of Negro was collected from the Census reports of 1960, which present data by tracts.

(b) Density: It is computed on the basis of Net Residential Alla in the City, which means only land in residential use. It excludes streets, alleys and any othtr land use categories.

(c) Median Family income: Median family income of each Census Tract in the subsection was taken; these were weighted by the population of the tract; and the median for the subsection was computed.

(d) % below poverty level : not available.

4. Additional Facts: These pertain to the above eight areas (subsections).

Information on Delinquency rate, public welfare, income level, and out of school youth, was not available.

5. Poverty Level:

Percentage of substandard housing: The Information pertains to the above eight areas.There is no definition of 'substandard housing'. However, the City Planning Commission provides information about total housing units" and "sound conditions with all facilities". Thus the figure shown is the percent of housing units which are not In "sound condition with all facilities".

88 -83-

A PROFILE OF THE PHILADELPHIA SCHJOL SYSTEM

Size of the System

Total number of schools 279 date September. 1968

No. of elementary schools 221 date September. 1968

No. of Junior schools 16_ date September,_1963

No. of Senior High Schools 22 date September, 1968

11. Racial_ ompokiAlon and Distribution of Staff and Students'

A. Staff

No. 12_

Negro 5,675 33

Negroes in white schools 407 12.8

Negroes in Negro schools 3,429 48.8

In elementary schools 3,228 40

In Senior High Schools 690 18

Certified personnel

Classroom teachers 3,517 31

Ratio pupils/teachers (elem.) 46:1 (negro-negro) 77:1 (Total-Negro)

26:1 (tot-tot)

(sec.) 66:1 (Negro-Negro) 127 :1 (Total-Negro)

20:1 (Tot-tot)

Mean years experience (teachers) not available

% first year teachers not available

% non-degree not available

% D.A. See footnote

% M.A. See footnote

Sala,y - minimum (EtachN 57.300. September. 1969

maximum (Bach) 512,000. September. 1969 R9 -84-

B. Students2

Negro enrollment In elementary schools:

Year No. A-

September, 1968 102,413 60

Number of Negroes iu Selle5ate4 Flementat, trhoott..:*

Year No.

September, 1968 66,356 65 **

39 *A*

Comments:

* Per cent of Negro enrollment in elementary school.

**Per cent of total enrollment In elementary school.

*** 95% or more Negro students.

Student Performance 3

Test Score (date: Schools 95-)003; White lUandardIzed Negro

Grade 2

Grade 4

Grade 6 Not available - See Footnote

Grade 8

Stanford Reading_Achlevement

End of 3rd Year

End of 6th Year

90 -85-

C. School Board

Method of selection: The nine-member Board of Education is appointed by the

Mayor. In case of any vacancy, it is filled by an appointee, selected

from a list of three to six persons submitted to the Mayor by a 13-member

Educational Nominating Committee.Full term is six years and membership

is limited to two full terms.

Number of Negroes on School Board: Two

Members of the Philadelphia Board of Education

Mr. Richardson Dilworth President

Rev. Henry H. Nichols Vice-President

Mr. Gerald A. Gieeson, Jr. Member

Mr. George Hutt

Mr. William Ross

Mrs. Albert M. Greenfield ti

Mr. Jonathan E. Rhoads

Mr. Robert M. Sebastian

Mrs. Ruth V. Bennett 11

91 -86-

FOOTNOTES

1. Racial Composition

A. Staff

Negro: means total number of Negro staff members of all categories.

Negroes In white schools: means total number of Negro staff members in schools w;th 80 per cent or more pupils white.

Negroes in Negro schools: means total number of Negro staff members in schools with 80 per cent or more pupils Negro.

.he figures for elementary and senior high schools are Oven, thcorres- ponding figures for Junior high schools are 1128 and 35 per cent.

Certified personnel: not clear.

Ratio pupils/teachers:

Negro Pupil: All pupil: All pupil: Negro Teacher Negro teachers All teachers

Elementary Schools 46:1 77:1 26:1 (102,413:2219) (169,862:2219) (169,862:6082)

Jr. High Schools 40:1 65:1 23:1 (33,493:838) (54696:838) (54,696:2445)

Sr. High Schools 66:1 127:1 20:1 (30,536:460) (58418:460) (58.418:2874)

Mean years experience (teachers) % first year teachers -- The Board of Education % non-degree does not have this information.

% B.A. This Is not available by race. However, of all the % M.A. teachers In the school system 63% have B.A. Degrees and 31% M.A. degrees. The rest have other qualiflentIons.

2. Students - No. of Negroes In segregated elementary schools:A segregated elementary school means a school with 95X or more pupil Negroes.

3. Student Performance - information In the specific form desired is not available.

92 -87-

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON A0ELPHi

U.S. Census of Population and Housing: 1960 - Census Tracts, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-NJ, SMSA

U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Population estimates, Series P-25, No. 411, of December5,1968, "Provisional Estimates of the Population of 100 large Metropolitan Areas: July I, 1967."

Philadelphia City Planning Commission, December, 1966. Public information Bulletin No. II, Recent Historical Trends.

Philadelphia City Planning Commission, December, 1967, Public Information Bulletin No. 12, Land Use and Residential Density, Phi:adelphia, 1960.

Board of Education, the School District of Philadelphia, Facts and Figures 1968-69.

Office of Research and Evaluation, Summary of Personnel in the Philadelphia Public Schools, Board of Education, January, 1969.

Office of Research and Evaluation, 1959-1968 Negro Enrollment in the Philadelphia Public Schools, Board of Education, April, 1969.

Office of Research and Evaluation, The Philadelphia City Wide Testing Program: Report of the Spring 1968 Achievement Test Results, Board of Education December, 1968.

Office of Research and Evaluation, Enrollment: Negro and Spanish Speaking in the Philadelphia Public Schools- 1968-1?69, Board of Education, 1969.

93 CHAPTER 4

THE ADAMS-MORGAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL PROJECT:

WASHINGTON,D.C.

Introduction

Over the past fifteen years Washington, D.C. has been in the process of becoming a Negro city of impover.Jhed black settlers.As of 1970, the estimated

Negro population is 75% of the total city population of 848,500. In the high density Negro areas, the per cent of residents falling below poverty levelIs from 16% to 41%. The median family income for all high density Negro areas is

$4743.00. A White House Hunger Conference concluded that "close to one-third of Washington's population" is subsisting on poverty level incomes. The Negro unemployment rate In 1968 was 5.5 while the white unemployment rate was 2.4.

The city's school system reflects the characteristics described above.

The per cent Negro pupils in elementary school population of 88,069 in 1969 was

94.4. Negroes on the staff constitute about 77%.The majority of the Negro staff are in the elementary school system. In the senior high schools, Negroes constitute about 17% of the personnel.The STEP mathematics and reading scores reported in median percentile bands at the sixth grade level indicate a range of 22 - 36 for schools with 95-100X Negroes, and 76 - 86 for schools with more than 50% white. Eight of the eleven school Board members are Negroes.

Concept of a School

As far back as 1954 the principals of the two elementary schools, Adams and Morgan, decided on the need for community improvement of conditions in their neighborhood. The Adams-Morgan neighborhood includes 24,000 people in a Northwest section of Washington close to its downtown area. There are families on welfare payments and othe:. on $25,000 a year.However, the families whose children attend these two schools are preponderantly black and poor.

The deterioration of housing In the area since World War 11led to attempts in 1954 and 1958 to organize a halt to the spreading blight. In 1959, 94 -89-

the Adams-Morgan Community Council was formed to deal with the physical and

social problems of the neighborhood. One of the programs that emerged was the

Idea of a community-run school.

The definition of a community school as it emerged was as follows:

(1) The school must be governed by a representatively elected Board of local community people with broad powers.The Board must have maximum control of staffing, curriculum, financing, outside resources, and use of the physical pant.

(2) The school must reflect the needs and desires of the community

in its educational program, and in the other services and facilities it offers.

(3) The school building should serve as a community center providing educational, remedial, recreational, and enrichment programs for everyone In

the community.

What are the educational objectives of the comrinity school? The Adams-

Horgan School Council expressed itself as follows:

(1) A school whose children will learn those things they need to know

to survive in this society.

(2) A school where they and their children are treated with respect and allowed to carry themselves with dignity.

(3) A school where they and their children are welcomed, and does not

insult them by indicating that something is wrong with the way they 'gook, speak, or dress.

(4) A school where the staff and Board are responsible to them and

their needs, and should not dictate to tl:em what someone else has decided is

"good for them".

(5) A school where the program should be fashioned from "the nature rf the people living in the community, 'nd from the children utilizing the school

rather than rigidly defining itself as an institution accepting only those peoplt who already fit into a set definition." -90-

(6) A school with a minimum of social problems because what is socially acceptable in a community should be worked with and tolerated within the school setting.

(7) A school where children are not abused, either physically or emotionally.

(8) A school where children are not made to feel embarassed or inadequate, and where they feel that everyone in the school is working for them and not against them.

(9) A school where everyone is encouraged to remain continually involved in learning, and to work continually to improve his life and the life of the community.

(10) A school where competition has no place, and where ?Ii should be willing to help one another whenever help is needed.

School-Community Relations

In an article in the Harvard Educational Review of Spring, 1968, Paul tauter, who as a member of the Antioch-Putney Graduate School of Education, and the first

Director of the Adams-Morgan Project wrote: "It is a measure of the desperation of the urban school crisis that a project so new, so untried, and - as yet - so devoid of significant results has attracted so much attention."In the eyes of all concerned, the Adams-Morgan project became one of the major testing grounds for the "community school" approach.

Effective control of the Morgan elementary school was turned over to Antioch

College for a five year period beginning in 1967. Antioch, with the advice of a

"Parents Advisory Board" would select staff, determine curriculum, and allocate resources within normal budget allotments.Actually, what emerged was a threefold partnership In decision - making; Antioch College, the "Advisory Board", and the Board of Education - a partnership in collaborative administration which did not work. The "maximum autonomy" given to Antioch did not define what powers the Board of Education retained or the community was given. The Board of Education -91- from the inception of the project has maintained that it could not give up Its legal powers and responsibilities, and that It was simply delegating some of its powers. The "Advisory Board" objects to even the assertion on the part of the

Board of Education of its theoretical powers. The AdaMs-Morgan Community Council has a wide-ranging cause with its core being the neighborhood school and its community residents.

Lauter, in his Harvard Educational Review article, describes the Council as follows: "The Council was and Is, dominated largely by white and middle-class people living west of 18th Street; it has a strong contingent of young professionals, liberal and wishing to be politically active. Many of them had moved

Into the neighborhood, bought houses, and wanted to find some means to make an

'Integrated community' a reality, though their school-age children up to that time attended Adams (mostly Negro, but middle-class) or, more likely, Oyster

(across Rock Creek Park and predominantly white).Many of the people who participate in the Council have an interest in tha arts, and the summer programs it has run mainly forthe poor and black children in the neighborhood have strongly emphasized the arts."These members, In a sense "outsiders", who had adopted the poor Negro residents and their children, developed the idea of working for

"true quality education". The objective of quality education, the Council members reasoned, could best be achieved by having the neighborhood run its own schools.

From the first, the impetus for "community control" came from the white members, and the plannkg hardly involved the population "served" by the Morgan school project. However, In the course of the past three years some local Negro leadership has emerged devoted to the concept of "running their own school". The city's

Board of Education which has a majority of Negroes Is regarded as part of a dis- tant bureaucracy, and not fitting their conception of "Ottir people" running their own schmis.

The significant factor in the development of the Morgan School was the fact that the original planning was done without the Morgan School parents and the 97 -92- school administration.The parents of most of the Morgan children were excluded from the development of the program, as well as most of the school administration.

The School Superintendent and one or two Board members were involved In the early negotiations. However, claims were made about the anger of the community at the schools. The result was a good deal of resentment and non - involvement In the

Project on the part of school officials.

Antioch's involvement was in recruiting a teaching staff, many of them still in use. The Morgan School had experienced nearly a complete turnover with the inception of the Project.The staffing of the school was reorganized from an allocation of 27 teachers and 3 specialists to 17 certified teachers, 14 non- professional community interns, and 11 Antioch interns.Classes were organized into ungraded teams. The Issue of black vs. white staff never occurred at Mor- gan, since the staff had been all black before it became a community school.The changes brought in six white staff members.The first few months of the new school under Antioch administration was characterized by chaos and dissention.

In addition to operating and staffing the school, Antioch was to lobby for additional funds and improvements.These problems plus the overwhelming ones of staff changes within a limited budget pushed the contractual relationships between Morgan and Antioch to an abrupt end at the end of one year.

The new Negro teachers and Interns were upsetting to not only some of the older teachers, but to many members of the Negro community. Talk about black power and the very term "black" came at first, as a shock.Others in the Negro community saw the school's new staff as a threat to their relationships with the local white power structure. The concept of black power was also a.threat to some members of the white community and their views of building an Integrated community. The new curriculum that the Morgan school was introducing came to be defined as a race pride curriculum. The basic divergencies of white and

black prents began to emerge. White parents and; some middle-class Negroes wanted French In the curriculum; black parents contemptuously dismissed French 98 93- as a frill.Disputes arose as to whether only black teachers could be effective teachers in ghetto schools, and as to whether there was a need to use the school to build a meaningful black culture for Negroes.The extent of local Negro participation was evidenced by the fact that 3 per cent of the white school population was able to elect five wit of a total local board of ten.

The chaos in the school in Its first year was reacted to more strongly by

Negro parents. They preferred order and obedience among the children to experimentation. Their own attitudes reflected the rather authoritarian perspective of the community. To them, the chief purpose of the School was to bring about the obedience and discipline they had failed to impart, so that their children could parallel the achievtJments of white children. But how could this be done with interns from the community whom they knew to have little, if any, training.

The new program came to be defined as one which was imposing untrained staff members to teach their children. "Control" of chili behavior to the local Negro community person meant physical discipline, and this was not taking place. Middle- class professionals were undisturbed by this, and proceeded with patience to build a school atmosphere that was not authoritarian, but at the same time, had "built- in controls".

The changes in the school and the staff have had some positive impact. The schools pupils have settled down to classroom work with teachers and interns and learned to function within the new related permissive atmosphere. The newer teachers have brought new excitement to teaching and learned something about the need for organization and structure while introducing experimentation. At the same time, the experiments have not changed in any significant manner, the work of the experienced teacher.

Strained relations remain between the Adams-Morgan Project and the School

Board. The most militant position of the Project is that of obtaining comi.lete autonomy. This, the school Board cannot legally and will not, administratively, assent to. The failures of the Project will, thenefore. continue to be blamed -94+- on the School Board. At the same time, the Project has developed a core of committed and hard working black parents, and some impact on Project pupils is being made. They have given expression to a new atmosphere of friendliness, protectiveness of the school, accomplishment pride, and race consciousness.

Decentralization and community participation, in this sense, has made positive contributions. But the Project is an elementary education complex.What happens to these children in the schools they move onto in Washington? What Is their drop-out rate in high school compared to others?No one knows, and until questions of this type are answered, the judgements about the Adams-Morgan School

Project will continue to be surrounded by partisan arguments and emotional claims.

Lauter, in his Harvard Educational Review article expresses his judgements

as follows: " 1 do not wish to end on a note of pessimism, but it is hard to avoid it. There are endless years of social frustration and anger now being played out in the educational arena. It is hard to see how the fundamental issues of racisim and exploitation in this country can be resolved in schools -- especially when they have not been resolved In Congress or the coLrts. Neither can the educational issue -- of curriculum, or "discipline', for example -- be resolved simply by political decisions about who controls, or seem to control, the schools.

In saying that Adams-Morgan was both more and less than a community school, I

was hinting at the root of the difficult lesson I draw from our experience: the issues of community participation, teachers' attitudes and preparation, classroom organization and curriculum, and the roles of outside agencies all must be worked out together or the educational fabric will unravel almost as quickly as it is stitched."

100 -95-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, D.C.

I. Racial Composition and Population Size

Size of metropolitan area/ 2.717.818

Size of the city of Washington2 848,500

Percent Negro in Metropolitan area3 22.0

Percent Negro in Washington4 1950 35.0

1965 60.2

1970 (est) 75.0

1980 (est) 80.0

Negro as Percent of Non-white5 98.0

II. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 95% Negro6

1965 51.9%

1950 13.1%

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 70% Negro 7

1965 80.4%

1950 47.5%

Comments:

Figures In both sections Immediately above are for proportion of

Negro population in tracts with 70% or more Negro population and 95% or

more Negro population. Data for both years probably understate the degree

of Negro concentration due to undercounting of the Negro population,

especially in heavily negro census tracts. 101 -96-

Most Heavily Negro Social Planning Areas 8

DIstrict9 Percent Negro Density10 Median Family % Below Income Poverty Level ($3,000/yr)

Statistical Area 5 83.5 3.43 $5,283 21.0

Statistical Area 7 91.8 3.26 $3,494 41.0

Statistical Area 14 98.7 3.96 $4,922 21.5

Statistical Area 15 89.1 3.81 $4,740 23.0

Statistical Area 16 81.5 3.29 $5,363 15.8

Additional Facts Concerning the High Negro Density Areas:11

Median Family Income in year __Iy,743

Size of areaapproximately 6.3 square miles

Population 207,993

Number of elementary schools in area 55

Delinquency rate Not available for comparable areas

Population Density

School Enrollment 57,212 (includes 34,138 in 55 elementary schools, 14,409 in

13 junior high schools and 8 665 in six high schools in the area.

Unemployment 6.2

Public Welfare 35,826

Income Level 24.5% below $3,000 annual income (families)

Out of School Youth* High school dropout rates are now estimated at approximately

50 per cent by Mr. William H. Simons, President Washington, D.C. Teachers

Union; the Board of Education cites a 40 per cent figure.

* In this context, dropout rate refers to the percentage of students entering high school who fall to graduate.The Board of Education figure is taken from a news story In the December 29, 1969 Washington, post. The figure given by Mr. Simons was obtained from personal conversation during a quest lecture to an Urban Sociology class at Howard University on December 11, 1969. 102 -97-

111. Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard :12 18.9

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3,00013 24.6

Unemployment rates in the City of Washington, D.C.14

Date Avereqe Negro White

1960 4.4 5.6 3.1

1968 4.5 5.5 2.4

23.1 26.3 )5.9 Comments:

As indicated in several places elsewhere, the above figures are gen-

erally based on 1960 census data. On January 1, 1970 the Washington Post

carried a news story reporting the findings of a conference panel of

nutrition problems in the District of Columbia. The panel concluded that

"close to one-third of Washington's population" is subsisting on poverty

level incomes.

103 -98-

Footnotes

1. Figure cited is drawn from study of Washington, D.C. and its metropolitan area by Hammer, Greene, and Slier Associates (private research group) for 1967.

2. Figure cited is for 1967 and was provided by the Statistical Information Systems Group, District of Columbia Management Office, Demographic Unit.

3. Figure cited is based on data drawn from study of Washington, D.C. and its metropolitan area by Hammer, Greene and Slier Associates (private research group) for 1967.

4. Figure cited for 1950 is based on U.S. Bureau of the Census data.Figure for 1965 is based on data provided by the Statistical Information Systems Group, District of Columbia Management Office, Demographic Unit in 1968 publication, Population of Census Tracts in the District of Columbia by Age and Race: April 11960 and July 1, 1965. Estimates for 1970 and 1980 are based on data provided by the Statistical Office, National Capital Planning Commission, which stresses the extreme caution to be exercised when dealing with population projections of this nature.

5. Figure cited is based on 1960 U.S. Bureau of the Census data and est' provided by Statistical information Systems Group, District of Colun-b, Management Office, Demographic Unit.

6. Figure cited for 1950 is based on U.S. Bureau of the Census data. Fl r cited for 1965 is based on data provided by the Statistical Informat c Systems Group, District of Columbia Management Office, Demographic U in 1968 publication, PopJlation of Census Tracts in the District of c( by Age and Race: Aprii1,12b2Ardlulti. 1965.

7. ibid.

8. The areas for which data are reported contained more than 90% non wi populations in 1967. All figures cited in this section are from 196() J. Bureau of the Census data. Comparable data for 1969 would probably. r a higher percentage of Negro families in most of the statistical ;Ire,s as well as little, If any, improvement in median family income and ptice.J. below poverty level indices.

9. District of Columbia census tracts are divided by many city agencies

statistical areas. Statistical Area 5 contains tracts 33,34,87, and ' Statistical Area 7 contains tracts 46, 47,48,49,50, and 86. Statisticai Area 14 contains tracts 78.1, 78.2, 78.3, 78.4, 78.5, and 78.6.Statistical

Area 15 contains tracts 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, and 85. Statistical Are.% I contains tracts 88.1, 88.2, 89, 90, and 91.

10, The density figures cited refer to populations per household.

11. The figures immediately following combine data for the five statistical areas cited above and are generally based on 1960 U.S. Bureau of the Census data. The population density figure is for population Leer household in the area. The unemployment figure Is an average (arithmetic mean) of tine unemployment rates for the 27 census tracts contained in the five statistical 104 -99-

areas. This figure does not include those individuals not in the labor force at the time data were collected and is therefore, an under-representation of the area's employment diffkuities. The data on the numberof elementary schools in the area and school enrollment are for 1969 and are based on material provided by the Department of Automated Information Services Statistical Office for the Public .Schools of the District of Columbia In- cluding their November 18, 1969 report, Pu 11 Memhership in Regular Day Schools On October 16, 1969 compared wittiOctobey)Schooajlay_Grades and by Race. The public welfare figure is the only figure in this section referring to the entire District of Columbia. The figure, supplied by the D.C. Department of Welfare, is for January 1, 1969. Then, approximately six per cent of all black residents of the District of Columbia were receiving public assistance.

12. The percentage of "substandard" housing refers to those housing units in the area classified either as "dilapidated" or "deteriorating" in the 1960 U.S. Bureau of the Census. These may be regarded by some as underestimatin g the degree of substandard housing actually existing.

13. Negro areas examined are the five statistical areas cited above. Data examined again refer to 1960 figures.

14. The figures cited for 1960 are from the U.S. Bureau of the Census data. The figures cited for 1968 are from U.S. Department of Labor, Manpower Administration, Washington, D.C., Summary District of Columbia Sub-Employment Index, 1968. The first set of 1968 figures gives the total district, Negro, ano white unemployment rates. The second set of figures gives the sub- employment rates which yield a more complete picture of an area or group's economic plight.Unemployment is defined as "those persons actively looking for work and unable to find it." The unemployment rate "represents the number unemployed as a percent of the civilian labor force." The flb- employment rate not only takes account of those who are unemployed but also those who are working part-time "because full-time work is not available", those who are "not working and not looking for work but wi I would probably enter the labor force if they were provided the proper assistance," and those who are "subsisting on an annual income at or below the poverty level." The 1960 and 1968 figures for Negroes were actually reported in both the 1960 U.S. Bureau of the Census report and the U.S. Department of Labor Manpower Administration report for non-whites. The differences between these figures and those here reportted for Negroes are assumed to have been minimal.

105 -100-

A PROFILE OF THE WASHINGTON SCHOOL SYSTEM

1. Size of the Systeml

Total number of schools 186 date 10/6

No. of elementary schools 140 date 10/69

No. of Junior High Schools 30 date 10/69

No. of Senior High Schools2 16 date 10/6a

II. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff andStudents3

A. Staff

ilt 2/2...

Negro 6,421 76.6

Negroes in white schools 17) 3.0

Negroes in Negro Schools 5,574 97.0

In elementary schools 4,133 53.3

In Senior High Sc' .110 1,303 16.8

Certified personnel5 5,279 73.5

Classroom teachers(' 7,182 85.7

Ratio pupils/teachers (elem.) 22.8:1 7 (sec.) 16.3:1

Mean years experience (teachers)

% first year teachers 5,4

% non-degree 2.6

% B.A. 72,1 8 % M.A. 25.3

Salary - minimum (Bach) $7,000 9 maximum (Bach) $10.850 or $12,040

106 -101-

8. Students

Negro enrollment in elementary schools:

Year No.

1968 88,666 93.9

1969 88,069 94.4

Number of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools:

'. No. .1.. OefinitiOn of Segregated Year .

1969 85,573 97.2 80% or more Negro

83,132 94.4 90% or more Negro

60,554 68.8 99% or more Negro

Comments:

See table immediately above for possible operational definitions of

"segregated elementary school."

107 -102-

Sequential Tests of Educational Progress (STEP) Mathematics

Student Performance Median Percentile Bands*

Test Score (date: 10/69) Schools 95-100X White (Standardized Negro (More than 50% white)

Grade 2 Data not available

Grade 4 0 - 51 (82) 72 - 89 (9)

Grade 6 22 - 36 (82) 76 - 86 (9)

Grade 8 Data not available

Grade 9 15 - 4O (24) Of no meaning

Students' Reading Achievement Sequential Tests of Educational Progress (STEP) - Reading jdate: 10/(9)

End of 3rd Year Data not available

End of 4th Year 25 - 46 (97) 71 - 80 (9)

Ena of 6th Year 27 - 42 (97) 74 - 88 (9)

* The STEP Mathematics and Reading scores for each District of Columbia Public School are reported as median percentile bands. A percentile band guards against too rigid an interpretation of a particular score. The data reported here are, therefore, medians of all the medians given for the types of schools in question. The number of schools of each type (e.g., 95-1006 Negro or White) are given in parenthesis In the above tables. They do not represent the total number of 95-100% Negro or White schools, but they do represent all the schools of these types for which data were available. No Mathematics Grade 9 Percentile Band is provided for White Schools, as only two fell into this category.Their median percentile bands were 47 - 70 and 71- 88.

108 -103-

C. School Board

Method of Selection: Members are elected by those voting among eligible District

of Columbia residents. Eight school board members represent specific city

wards while three represent the total city on an at-large basis. The

Board of Education appoints the Superintendent of Schools for a three

year term.

Number of Negroes on School Board:1° 8

Members of the Washington Board of Education11

Mrs. Anita Ford Allen

Mr. Charles Cassell

Mr. Bardyl Tirana

Mrs. Muriel Alexander

Rev. James E. Coates

Mr. Edward L. Hancock

Mr. Nelson C. Roots

Mr. Albert A. Rosenfield

Mrs. Martha Swaim

Mrs. Mettle G. Taylor

Mrs. Evie Washington

Actiag Superintendent of Schools - Dr. Benjamin J. Henley

109 -104 -

Footnotes

1. Data in this section were obtained from Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Pupil Membership in Regular Day Schools on October 16. 1969 Compared with October 17. 1968, by Schools, by Grades and by Race, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical Office, November 18, 1969, HEW 5140 series.

2. The total number of 16 includes 11 senior high schools and five vocational high schools.

3. Data in this section were obtained from the following sources: Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Number of Regular Full-Time Educational Employees On October 17. 1968 by Type of Position. School level_,Race, and Sex, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical Office, February 10, 1969; Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Numbers of Teacher Positions, Pupil Membership, and Pupil-Teacher Ratios for All Schools Levels on October 171968, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical Office, March 3, 1969; Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Degrees Held b Teachers on October 17, 1968, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical Office, July 8, 1969; Public Schools of the District of Columbia, 1.12211 Membership in Regularity,. Schools on October 16, 1969 Compared with October 17, 1968,by_Schools, by_ Grades and by Race, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical Office, November 18, 1969; Facts and Figures 1968-1969, Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C.; Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Years of Teaching Experience - D.C. Public School leachers, prepared by Department of Automated Information Systems Statistical bffice, July 30, 1969; and Test Results - Grades 4,6,9, and 11- Reading and Mathematics, Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Department of of Pupil Personnel Services, Pupil Appraisal Division, July 1969. Stanford Achievement data were not available. Although all the STEP data were gathered in March 1969, they are to be Interpreted as October 1968 estimates. Alldata pertaining to staff as well as teacher/pupil ratios are based on 1968 figures. Salary figure,. only refer to the 1969 schedules.

4, The number and percentage of staff in senior high schools includes the personnel in vocational high schools.

5. The Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Board of Examiners, reports that all personnel are certified in a technical sense. However, a distinction is drawn among permanent, probationary, and temporary teachers. Temporary teachers are regarded as non-certified in the reported data.

6. The percentage reported for classroom teachers refers to the percentage of the entire educational ataff (i.e. all educational employees) employed as classroom teachers.

7. The pupils/teachers ratio for secondary schools includes the vocational high schools' students and teachers.

8. The percentage includes teachers possessing either a Doctor's Degree or additional credits beyond the Masters Degree.

110 -105-

9. The max'mum salary with a B.A. is $10,850 after 13 years of service and $12,040 after 18 years of service.

10. As of January, 1970.

II. As of January, 1970.

icidek-kirkieleirkir

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON WASHINGTON, D.C.

District of Columbia Laws and Statutes, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,

D.C., 1967.

The Nation's Capital, U.S. National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C.

1961.

Washington, Potomac Books, 1966.

Note: Beyond those sources cited in the footnotes to the two preceding sections, there exists a wide selection of U.S. Census Bureau reports on various vital statistics for the District of Columbia. There are also numerous surveys on the District of Columbia which have been conducted by the U.S. Labor Department, the National Capital Planning Commission, and the various Washington, D.C. social science research organizations (e.g. Bureau of Social Science Research, Washington Center for Metro- politan Studies, etc.). These reports are available on request from the relevant agencies.

( 111 CHAPTER 5

LOS ANGELES: GUIDED PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL

Introduction

While Los Angeles has a relatively low proportion of Negroes (21.5%) as over against other urban areas, it does have a high propotion of recent ethnic migrants

(Mexican, 20% and Asiatic, 5%). The result of these demographic characteristics

is a large population of school children with special school problems, and a

large parental population who, In the past, were outside the school system and

today pave become interested in it. In general, it Is a population which Is also on poverty levels of income (25% below $3500 in high density Negro areas In 1969) and with high unemployment rates (Central City, 1968 non-white, 0.6%; white 4.6%).

These population groups reside for the most part In large homogeneous highly dense areas of the city, and their children attend schools located in the same areas.

In 1969 about 25% of the pupils In attendance at the city's elementary schools were Negro. At the same time, about 15% of the staff employed by the school

system in 1968 were Negro.

The problem of Los Angeles Is further aggravated by community unrest, that

leads to deliberate interference with the educational process. The population mobility which Is reflected in the movement from the rural to the urban area by

the minority and low-income groups and their children reflects Itself

In Inferior education In urban areas ;,r these children. Now, to further compound

the problem, the urban crisis Is located In most parts of the city where the

incidence of Infant mortality is the highest, the incidence of neurological damage

from malnutrition and other factors contributing to the failure to learn is the highest, the incidence of tuberculosis is the greatest, crime and deaths by violence Is the greatest, reading scores are lowest, transiency is highest, measured I.Q. scores are the lowest, the number of school age children with

112 -107 - police records isthe highest, the income levels are the lowest, the number of people receiving aid or on welfare or receiving aid for families with dependent children is the highest, the educational levelis the lowest, the unemployment is the highest -- all of these factors are characteristics of these parts of the city.These problems are so frustrating and seemingly endless that the tendency is for some to seek out simple solutions, particularly legislative simple solutions. Most of the city's group, regardless of their vested interests and regardless of their point of view recognize the need for improving the educational product, in their view. Improving the educational product means a youngster who reads better, writes better, comminicates better, adds better, subtracts better, and whose values are improved and attitudes improved.This is the kind of project all really agree upon.

School Problems

The public schools in Los Angeles, the critics state, have not been able to teach black youngsters and brown youngsters to read, write, add and subtract competently. They state that it's not the fault of the children, it's not the fault of the schools, however, they point out and state that the schools have the children for 1/6 of their waking hours. The problem is that the schools bring little influence to bear in the five or six hours a day that they have the youngsters independent of their family background and economic status. In other words, the schools as they are now organized cannot possibly offset the effects of living in the ghettos and all the social problems that go along with it. This does not relieve the public schools of the meaning for value reform in order to be more effective in what they do and in order to produce a product of excellence.

Disenchantment, then, on the part of the minority groups developed in Los Angeles and the feeling that "Whitey is never going to give it to us". The view has emerged among some that the only way they are going to succeed was to do it themselves. These groups wish to have complete control of the school program.

"The process is called decentralization sometimes", a school official 113 -108 - pointed out, "but really hit it means is local control. And then you look at where we are going - as you look at the pressures and the things in our own society and our own campuses, pressures for separate black dorms, separate black studies and no one, except black students, for example, In the black studies programs. The teachings on the part of some of the black organizations for self-

recognition and separateness - it makes you wonder, are we headed down the road now to a separate but legal system? It's important then, that we look at the

term 'decentralization' and see what It really means and what people are really

talking about. If we accept the fact that the ultimate objective of education

is the highest quality product ppssible, then decentralization or local control becomes a means to an end, and must be clearly considered a means to an enl, rather than an end in itself."

The need, then, is to ask of decentralization -- decentralization of what.

Services, control, or participation in decision-making7We need to examine, too, the question of the size of the public school system. Is size or bigness the real issue? Are there built -In aspects of a district the size of New York or the size of Los Angeles?Are they automatically prevented from being able to offer as effective a program of education than a smaller district, for example?

Is a large district Incapable of being responsive to the changing needs of a community as these needs are perceived and often perceived differently? The feeling in Los Angeles is that size in Itself need not be a disadvantage.

Historically, it's been a considerable advantage - the advantages in terms of the depth and breadth of services provided, the economic base and the economy of operation. In fact, two cr three years ago, the Legislature In the state demanded the unification of small districts In order to fyim larger districts that provided e sounder economic base. So the question is and the critical issue is, how can the advantage of size and 4igness be utilized without losing the sensitivity and responsiveness to the needs of the people being served? 114 -109-

The Los Angeles School District

Los Angeles has grown from a 28 square mile district to today's 711 square miles. Secondly, the mobillti of the minority population within the boundaries of the school district itself needs to 'e examined. It should be polited out that the Los Angeles Unified School District is larger than the city of Los

Angeles and there is no administrative or political relationship to the Mayor.

It is an independent district. Actually, there are a large number of cities and communities within the District. The City of Los Angeles, for example, is 450 square miles; the District Is 711 square miles.The source of nourish- ment for this growth has been the movement of population. Originally the District was centered around the Plaza area of Los Angeles. By the turn of the century, annexations into the District brought the service to 46 square miles. Six years later, further annexations were made. By 1909 it had grown to 90 square miles. During the next year, other areas voted on annexation and the District grew to 229 square miles. The following year, six more annexations brought the service area to 295 square miles.During the next three years, four areas were annexed intothe District and Beverly Hills became the first area to withdrew and form its ovrt school district, but the District then served an area of 289 square miles. In May, 1915 the largest single annexation took place with 170 square miles of the San Fernando Valley electing to join the District. Nine additional annexations brought the service area to 507 square miles. During the next five years, the people of 25 other areas voted to Join the district.

At the beginning of the "Twenties", the District was serving an area of 619 square miles. The growth continued into the mid-twenties and the Palm Springs area became the second to withdraw and form its own school district. Even with this 24 square mile area leaving, it still served an area of 620 square miles.

Fifty-one annexations took place during the following six years, with nine community areas electing to join the District.

In the second year of the Depression, the District served an area of 688 115 -110 -

square miles. In the next two years, the area now known AS Southgate and

Huntington Park City joined the District and after that, annexations were very

few. By 1942, it served an area of 724 square miles. The Fighting Forties was

an era of realignment, and in 1947 Florence withdrew to form its own school

district, and by 1952 it served an area of 701 square miles. Then came forty-

seven annexations which were little more than minor boundary relocations and

the decade was highlighted by the fact that on July 5, 1960, the District

officially became known as the Los Angeles Unified School District.By 1961, it

served an area of 696 square miles. The following year the Topanga School

District electorate voted to join the District.With only minor annexations

since then, it now serves an area of 711 square mile..

Los Angeles County consists of 38 unified school districts. In addition,

there are as elementary districts within 9 union high school districts.The

County district covers over 4,000 square miles with a student population in

excess of 11 million pupils. It is significant to notethat while serving only

17% of the County area, it provides an education for almost 42% of all the students

in grades K through 12.

While this history of growth and development of the Los Angeles Unified

School District is informative, knowledge of the District would be incomplete without a look at the present and past ethnic composition of the District.The

primary concentration of the Negro population is in the vicinity of Santa Barbara

and Central Avenues.A small concentration in what is now known as Watts

developed by 1940. During the next 10 years, the concentration became more in-

tense in this Central Avenue area and there has been a westerly migration in

the vicinity of Adams Boulevard and Western Avenue. The denrity continued to

Increase in the Watts area. A small percentage Is now present in the area of

the San Fernando Valley. By 1960, the Negro distribution extended from the

south of Watts northerly to the central portion of Los Angeles In the vicinity

of Washington Boulevard and westerly to LaCieneqa Boulevard, and there is A

11G -11I- continuing increase in this area.Today the Negro student population is concentrated in the central metropolitan area of Los Angeles which extends from

Rosecranz Boulevard on the south to the vicinity of Wilshire Boulevard on the north.

In 1950 and 1960 California was one of five states that reported Spanish surname categories separately. In 1950 a moderate to heavy concentration of

Spanish surname population is seen in the East Los Angeles area. A moderate concentration also appears in several other areas, a heavy concentration is reported In the western sect.)n of the city of San Fernando. By 1960, a continued increase in density appears in the East Los Angeles area, the harbor area, and the San Fernando Valley area. It should be noted that while the density in the Watts area was decreasing, new growth was appearing in several other areas throughout the District. Through 1968, there was a continued concentration in the East Los Angeles area and the western portion of the city of

San Fernando. A light, but much more widespread distribution appeared in many areas of the District. There Is no significant Spanish surname enrollment in the Watts area at this time. Using the same ratio in an ethnic survey with other school districts immediately adjacent, Los Angeles appeared with a total

Spanish surname enrollment of 20.396, as compared with Glendale, 6.2%; Santa

Monica, 11.1%; and Beverly Hills with 2.0X.

The legal framework which the Legislature has established for Los Angeles sets the criteria for the establishment of any new unified school districts.

These are set out in the Education Code which is the series of laws which governs the schools In California. It requires that there be an average daily attendance of at least 10,000 youngsters in any new unified district formed.

Secondly, that any new district be adequate In terms of fiaancial ability and should not vary by any more than plus or minus 9X. It requires, thirdly, that the new districts must be organized on the basis of substantial community

Identity and fourthly. there must be omyisions for an eaultable division of 117 -112 - capital assets of the districts and lastly, that no new district formed may promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation.

Decentralization

It is important to examine the term - decentralization.What does it really mean? There is no one commonly accepted definition of the term. There is really a continuum of decentralization that extends all the way from complete autonomy at the local school level to the situation as it exists now In large districts that are very highly centralized, and in between these two are various shades.

It is important to look now at three points on this continuum, the three points that the District has. Most districts, or most states, have introduced into the Legislature bills that would require large districts to break up or separate or decentralize or do different things.The first point on the continuum would be to separate the District Into from 5 to 16 separate districts. There was one bill that literally required that Los Angeles separate into 10 districts. The second approach would be to retain the present structure of the existing District and create sub-districts with either elected or appointed Boards of Trustees at this level who would be given certain degrees of freedom of responsibility. This may be referred to as a metropolitan system which has the Central Board with the Superintendent and the sub-districts with their advisory boards and superintendents. The third point on the continuum would use the present administrative structure, but would decentralize services and resources, but most importantly, would decentralize the decision-making process to the local school level.

The general theory of separation of large districts into smaller ones is based on ,he assumption that education is best achieved in school systems that serve cities that have smaller populations than the large ones. If the city of Los Angeles, a city of 3i million people, Is divided into 10 parts, we are talking about smaller cities of about 350,000 that would have a school population of 60,000 to 65,000.Cities this size are a collection of ethnic, rAlinimic and economic communities; they are generally a heterogeneous collection 118 -113 -

of wealth, talent, poverty, educational level, religious areas, racial stock --

they are a mixture of all the "melting poelhat goes to make up America.These

are the things that one would find in a normal town of 350,000.Cities of

this size stretch across the country, and they appear to have responsible

school officials that understand the dreams and aspirations of the citizens;

they appear to be large enough to be efficient and yet small enough to be

responsive tothe community. They appear not to have the problems that the

large systems have and, therefore, separation is put forth as a solution to

the problems of large urban areas. If a large district was separated into 10 districts, great responsibility for authority and policy is placed in the hands of the locally elected or appointed Board of Education. The professional

responsibility and authority for execution of this policy is placed inthe hands of a Superintendent who is selected by the locally elected or appointed by the

Board of Education. And there is no greater differerme, then, between lay

responsibility and professional responsibility than in a large district, except now it goes ten ways instead of one.Keeping this in mind with the five criteria pointed out a while ago, the average daily attendance, community iden-

tity and division of assets, and the most neglected, separations, etc an attempt was made to divide the City of Los Angeles into ten districts.

The dimensions of these two attempts to divide did not take into consideration

the requirement for substantial community identity. There are 54 communities within the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles itself.There are 25 incorporated cities all or part within theboundaries of the school district, which

Includes the City of Los Angeles, and there are 15 that are identified but unincorporated, and an additional 15 that might become incorporated within

the school district boundaries itself, but it has not been possible to figure out how to crack that, as yet. It was found that it was not possible to separate on the basis of average daily attendance and assessed valuation without adding

the additional factor of community identity. and this could not be done without 119 -114 -

using the schools as an instrument to contribute to racial and ethnic segregation.

One school official expressed himself as follows: "People who will argue that

separation is the cure for what ails a large city are really contending that

all you have to do is take a city, like Los Angeles, draw lines around certain

areas calling them school boundaries and call that a school district.We feel

that any one of these that you might draw on this map, or on any other city map

as far as that is concerned, couldn't possibly produce a cross-section of the

population of a large city. The truth is, any new districts thSi may be formed

from a large city district, are going to come up with lesser districts that are

fa: more homogeneous than they are heterogeneous.But if a district is divided on the bosis of average daily attendance or any other way, the result is districts that are de juris segrated districts -- districts that have unequal assessed valution, districts that have unequal wealth and, under these circum- stancv:, separation will not provide for any better community identification

than now exists and would not improve the city. There is one overall objective

to look for in attempts to adjust our organization and this would be a better education for each child."

A second alternative Is the use of the metropolitan board idea. This would

retain the present Board of Education as the metropolitan board; it would be

responsible for the overall administration of the district.This plan envisioned a number of locally elected or appoInted area Boards of Trustees to whom would

be delegated powers and responsibilities that relate to curriculum, courses of

study, pupil conduct, pupil personnel; that is, whatever was decided to allocate or whatever degrees of freedoms were decided to be given.Now, this decentralized

structure would allocate responsibility and authority for educational policy and decision-making, or would sub-divide this authoriti between the Metropolitan

Board and the ten local appointed or elected area Boards of Trustees. Professional

responsibility for execution of policy would be organized between the Superinten- dent of the Metr000litan Board and the ten Suoerintendents of tle locally 120 -115 - appointed or elected Boards.The nature of this plan, then, basically is the withholding from local Boards of Trustees of full responsibility for poiicy decisions, and the local Superintendent has withheld from him total responsibility for administering the schools in his district or area.The groundwork then is laid for confusion, misunderstanding and dissension. It is clear looking at the East Coast, that if this system is going to be effective with degrees of freedom and responsibility that are handed to local boards, they have to be carefully and thoroughly agreed upon and specifically stated. This system or model could work if assignments are made carefully and specifically as to who is responsible for what, and if some provision is madefor reaching agreements among the people who disagree on these matters.An additional factor can be designated a self-corrective mechanism, for it is entirely possible to achieve an improved product on the educational production line within the present pattern or organization.

Historically, in Los Angeles, the school organization has adapted to meet the problems, and the needs, and to meet the pressures that have been the Los

Angeles history. A historical review of the organization and decentralization in Los Angeles City School District has disclosed that a centralized type of organization was in effect in 1930, nearly forty years ago. It is not unreason- able to assume that efforts of decentralization preceded that day by a good many years. In fact in the strictest sense, decentralization occurs in a school district with the establishment of a second school and the delegation of responsibility to the principal of that school. As a result of the 1934 Survey of the Los Angeles School District, the six existing elementary instructional areas became instructional sections each with an assistant superintendent who was responsible for elementary, secondary and evening schools. Then in 1938, apparently as a result of internal problems, the six instructional sections were abandoned and replaced with four elementary districts, with administrative responsibility fo secondary and evening schools moved to the central office. 121 -116 - Probably because of financial problems in 1942, the number of elementary districts was reduced from four to three. Then, several year later, in 1945, a central office, division of elementary education, was established together with four decentralized district offices. By 1947, the growth in the San Fernando Valley resulted in a fifth elementary district. Ten years later, continued growth of the Valley required the division of the Valley district into separate East Valley and West Valley districts.

Administrative Decentralization

In 1960, two management firms recommended to the distkict eight elementary administrative areas, and four secondary administrative areas be established, and in 1965, this was done. Since 1965, several other decentralization moves have taken place. Four curriculum development centers have been opened, and an East Los Angeles instructional planning center has been activated. The eight elementary administrative areas are also considered as assignment. areas, teachers employed by the school district are able to request assignment to specific areas.

School assignments are then worked out by the area offices.Two certificated employment offices, one in the Valley and the other in the South Harbor supple- ment the downtown personnel division employment office. It should be noted that eight decentralized maintenance areas have boundaries which are similar with those of the elementary administrative areas. Four secondary areas have continued in effect since 1965. The four areas are also considered assignment areas for secondary teachers.

There are six classified employment offices in the city covering 17 geographic areas to which classified employees can request assignment. Four health offices are located in conjunction with four of these employment offices.Eight decentralized welfare and attendance service offices serve eight areas with somewhat different boundaries than the eight elementary administrative areas. In addition to the established pattern of decentralized administrative control and service functions. the size of the district has enabled it to provide msny 122 -117 - specialized services.Although centrally administered, these services are dis-

persed throughout the district; the services are thus available where the need

is. Pupils with health problems in Los Angeles can receive help at one of ten health centers, five guidance centers and twelve dental clinics. These facilities are provided with the cooperation of the PTA. Programs for trainable mentally-

retarded children are available at 8 school locations.These pupils are bussed

to and from school. Additional epecial education programs are maintained throughout the district and include 8 elementary and 2 secondary schools for physically

handicapped or crippled children, I school for the blind and 2 schools for the deaf. Sight-saving classes, speech therapy classes and educationally handicapped classes are located in regular schools where there is available classroom space.

Over 200 students from other school districts surrounding Los Angeles are enrolled

in special programs offered by the school district. In recent years Los Angeles has been receiving a growing number of non-English-speaking children from Mexico and other Latin American countries. Twenty-nine of the 83 junior high schools have special foreign speaking and "English as a second language" classes. Twenty- one of the 54 high schools also maintain "special English as a second langauge" classes. The school district operates 67 children centers with a large proportion of them serving in areas with a large minority group population. There are, in

Los Angeles, 27 community adult schools in over 600 branch locations.

Title III Projects

The Title 111 Center services the total Los Angeles District. It is under an assistant superintendent at Headquarters of the Board of Education. It has as one of its responsibilities, working with people in the development of new projects, Innovative ideas, planning or the working with those that have already been funded, in refunding, budgeting, etc.There are Title III projects which have been funded under Title 111, and there are also those which have been funded under Title III as separate funding.The Title III Center has the responsibility for the Jordan education...1 complex and the Garfield complex. 123 -118 - The reason for that is that these two complexes cut across all levels of education;

elementary, secondary, and adult. There is one adult school, 1 high school,

1 junior high school and 4 elementary schools in the Garfield complex.

Each one of the Garfield schools has a school community advisory committee

that works with its own school. Each of these advisory committees has formed a complex advisory board which functions for the total area. This board is made

up of parent, teacher and, in some cases, student (mostly from the high school)

representatives from all of these and they have the control of that which takes place within the funds of the complex. When a program is written, they are in on the writing. This was all funded with Title 111 funds of $1,320,000.00

The activities and program are continuing a school community advisory committee, complex advisory board, family centers which hit the students at 31,

4 or 5 years old, kindergarten program which was new to the area where there was a teacher teaching a single session for 3 hours and usethe other time to work with small groups and parents. It is now a State law and all schools in the State and city will go into a single session next year. The individualized Instruction

in reading started with first grade and second grade last year, and has been extended to tHrd grade this year. The curriculum development aspect of it is

the curriculum necessary for the continuing of these projects. The past year

$877,000 was spent to operate the center and it averaged to $144.91 per pupil.

Some of these were adults which didn't use the money. Only the pupil cost was

Included; the in-service training cost was not included in total cost figures.

The number of kindergarten teachers, number of individualized instruction and number in articulation and the number in senior high schools -- the biggest bulk of the money was at these levels In estimating costs. If cost estimates were made on a program basis, which should be done, it would be much higher.

Kindergarten costs would actually be double.

The Center is involved in other projects ; there is an 18-school project,

an instructional management program, a Title I data base, a demographic information 124 -119-

b2se, end 20 new programs are being developed right now.A year ago, the

District formed what is called the 18 School Project. This year 5 other schools were added so there are 9 elementary and 9 secondary schools. These schools have been working very closely with their communities in the city -wide adoption of advisory committees at the local level. It is recommended for all schools and the report shows what schools havelhem and tohat degree, who is on them, etc. But even though the Superintendent's Bulletin said all schools should move in this direction, the District concentrated on the 13 schools last year in order to try to find guidelines for the City.

The principals and committee members were in agreement that the project

is proceeding in the right direction, and as expected, problems have been encountered, but a willingness has been found among school staff and community people

to work these problems through in the best interests of the children of the school.

The unique part about the Project is that local school programs are being decided cooperatively by community people and school personnel following a plan of assessing the needs of the children in that school setting, priorities, and developing alternate plans and selecting plans to meet the needs of the youngsters.

And this is the unique part about It -- the fact that is making it different from other projects in the City.

The parents do not conduct need surveys. The project provides the necessary

information using resource people In the schools -- the school nurse, the counselor,

the teachers themselves, records that are in the school -- and when the Information

is compiled, itis then shared with the advisory committee of the school planning council and from the information they have, they usually meet in committees and set up a priority of needs as they see it. In addition, the school is also doi-ig likewise.

It is important to note that there is a lot of emphasis placed upon the determination of needs and setting of priorities locally. 1Wo to three years 125 -120 - ago, the determination of needs and setting of priorities was done on a district- wide basis.The project maintains that the needs for a large city like Los

Angeles is different from one school to the next, from one community within a district to the next, so that the needs and the priorities which are set should be within that school or within that area. The parents set the groundwork for establishing the particular program. This procedure is set out in Superintendent's

Bulletin 19. Each school has a parent-school planning council. The council meets twice a month, more often if it is needed. The school staff will bring to their attention problems in the school or they, in turn, will bring their concerns to the school staff, to these meetings. And in these meetings, they discuss their concerns and come up with some recommendation that is passed along to the principal and the faculty and then the principal will meet together again with the committee and work again for some workable solution to the concerns of the community.At one particular school, an inner-city school, the school is Involved with double seszions -- the children are attending school half-days.

This was a major concern of the community advisory committee and En cooperation between the committee and the principal, they were able to work out a solution whereby the children attend school full time without additional facilities.

Community Advisory Committees

The Board of Education has not relinquied any powers whatsoever to the local groups, it is strictly advisory. The Chairman of the Jordan Educational

Complex expressed her views on advisory group powers -- the power to fire teachers, etc. -- as follows: "We don't need all these powers, we can get all these things by running a good program, because if we run a good progrwn in our schools, we will get rid of the unsatisfactory teachers." And a school official commented:

"I thought her philosophy was really good. You don't need the power to tell a teacher he or sheis no good, run a good program and they don't fit, so they will get out. And Ithink if these committees can function in this way, it will bring about local Involvement without too much uproar." 126 -121 - in the schools, the advisory committee meetings are set up su they are open meetings. Members of the community may come to the meetings and there is aspace on the agenda for them to express their feelings and they do, often quite

strongly. The meetings often last for three or four hours at a time making sure

the Garfield Complex is engaged in it's stated goals. Specific complaints about

teachers has not been A dominant phase of the program. There are, however, other

types of manifestations.At the Jefferson High School, a black principal was demanded; then the black principal had to leave. Now there Is a black principal

there. At Manual Arts, a white principal was there; now they hive a black vice- principal who is working with the 18 School Project. When they were having all the problems at Jefferson and the former principal left, he told the

community "Look, I came in -- you asked me to come in -- you didn't give me any

support, so I'm leaving" and he left the District.At the same time, the advisory

committee at Manual Arts welt to a white man in an all black community and

said, "Look, you're not going to leave us, are you? You're doing a good job."

it would seem, therefore, that people want people doing a good job -- black or white. In the Garfield area, they wanted more Mexican-American administrators

because there are very few in the District that have gone through what is called

the administrative branch. There have been pressures from two places - one is

to form what is called a Mexican-American Commission which was formed last year

and is operational now. One of the emphasis was to bring more teachers and more

Mexican-American administrators into the system. There had been one person, who had been a Supervisor of Foreign Language or years in the District, he is

now principal. He was not on a list, but he was appointed to this position.

There was one other person who was a Mexican-American and he was assigned to go

to East Los Angeles, and he refuted to go.He wanted to stay where he was and

the community didn't come to the Board and demand that he come there. They

said he had his right to go where he wanted to. The morale is high and one school official pointed out: " 1can cite for you isolated instances of complaints 127 -122 - we have them. But I think, and Ican say this with pretty good vecification,

in our Jordan area and in the Garfield aria where we developed these complexes with advisory committees, etc., there have been no walkouts, there have been no closings of the schools -the schools around them have, but they haven't.

Jefferson, Fremont, Manual Arts, yes; but not at Jordan, because we have the advisory committee there, they are working as a unit in the community.When some outsider from outside the area cones In and tries to stir things up, the

Committee Chairman says, 'get out of here, you're not part of our group.We're

running our community.' The same is true in the Garfield area. Garfield is surrounded by Lincoln and Roosevelt these two were the ones that were having

the most problems. They closed down the schools for a couple of days.Garfield

has its problems , the problems have been internal within the complex such as

'you didn't appoint the man we wanted to be the counselor at the school within

the complex, we want this man.'The advisory committee recommended names, the principal recommended names, and finally they took the people off the list and they got results. It took a long time, It took longer than they thought it would take, but it was solved at the local school level."

The complex itself tends tooperate as far as pt)grams within its community as a separate entity. Yet the principal of that schoolIs responsible to the

Area Superintendent.The line staff is still there, but the other phase, such as Project Director is appointed as a Director and not as a Superintendent, so he is directing the operation of the complex as It ties with the regular operations, and he then reports to the Assistant Superintendent for Urban Affairs. However, the principal reports to the Area Superintendent if he has a staff problem, or he goes to the Director. If the staff problem Is a personal one -- "I don't

like the way you are teaching, you're not doing a good job, and I'm thinking of relieving you" -- that is a purely staff line-Area Superintendent reporting system. But If it involves dismissal, that is the principal's responsibility.

The procedure for innovation is that the curriculum must to approved by the 128 -123 - County Superintendent. A course cannot be introduced directly by the teacher. if you want to introduce a course in the Influence of the Chinese on the Culture of California and you are in a school where there Is interest in Oriental language, the procedure is to take It in paperwork form through the Instructional and Planning Services Branch, It then gets numbered and put into the catalog and becomes legal. It is a procedure that becomes finally approved by the Board.

All the people along the line aren't giving judgement on it.The course content is looked at by the Supervisor in Curriculum and if he says that the outline covers the material, then it is worth a course.

Ethnic Oesentralizatlon Prolects

The decentralized unit has to respond to and deal effectively with the problems of teacher recruitment, teacher tenure, administrators, monies for construction, monies to Implement what parents feel and believe they need.The unit has to have flexibility inpackaging several sources of funds, and most important, in narrowing the creditibility gap between community, parental, and student requests and the ability of a decentralized unit to produce. The Board of

Education Is making an effort to respond to an urban crisis In the education of ethnic groups. "Community groups and parents know what they want; they are questioning whether they want decentralization, though,"a school official pointed out.

Los Angeles set up two separate systems, one in South Los Angeles ano one in East Los Angeles. They picked an area where all the elementary schools continually sent 100% of their youngsters to the junior high school which sends

100% of its youngsters to a senior high school. They selected two areas In the city which had some kind of community Identity, in South Los Angeles they selected

Watts, which was not too long after the Watts riots, and people in that community were making at that time, and still are, an effort to even more effectively do something about their own problems. They then picked a cummunity in East Los

Angeles. They had all kinds of assurances from everybody and were promised at 129 that time, $10 million out of the research funds from the Title 11 office,

$5 million in each complex, 5,000 youngsters total in each site. The idea caught on, and the next thing they knew, there was a conference in Washington about sub-systems in large districts, and they gave away the promised $10 million.

The result of all this was to end up with $ million.

The Garfield Educational Complex which Is the Title III Project located

in the Mexican- American area is related to a second complex located in the Watts area. The communities served by these two projects are characterized by high drop-out rates, a high rate of student absenteeism, a high percentage of welfare

recipients, low employment and low acac'emic achivement.Their combined pupil

enrollment- exceeds 18,000.The idea originated early in 1)67 as a step towards decentralization and as an attempt to meet the specific educational needs of distinct communities. A $35,000 planning grant was originally funded and obtained from the Federal government in order to form a four-man planning team.

The new approach adopted was to reverse the traditional approaches and go into '

the community anti in any way possible, seek to determine the educational needs

by personal contact and through this assessment, have them set the priorities

for the proposal to be submitted.The new program attempted to involve everyone

in the target area to the best of their ability; they had night and day meetings;

they met in large groups and small groups; and they met groups of every variety

and philosophy and made personal some calls if individuals wanted to request

information.A strong effort was made to contact everyone within the given

period of time and development of the planning team and their proposal. In

this way, they: were able to assess the needs of the community In a very distinct and very strong manner. The intent was to provide an articulated educational

experience from pre-kindergarten through the twelfth grade to the adult level.

The funding of $1,500,000 for two complexes on July 1, 1968 did not allow for

this anticipated articulation, but did provide for certain programs that met

the top priorities that had been set by the community.The emphasis actually 130 -125 - was really on the elementary school in a preventive way, rather than remedial or secondary, although there were a small number of programs in the junior high school and senior high, but not what had been anticipated In a very articulated sense.

The idea of a centrally located advisory board resulted after interest was expressed !n having a community group who would have the responsibility of the complex. This plan has brought about the unity of purpose to the program.The

Adviaory Board is made up of members of each of the school's advisory committees and they are elected at that local level. The Boards include teachers, secondary students, and representatives of Headstart. They have since added one representative of the administration of the seven complex schools in the Berkeley area and one administrative representative; and they have also included a new category to allow one of the coordinators of the complex staff to sit in. Recently, the

Mexican-American Commission requested a new category be added to the Board and that a member of the Mexican-American Commission be allowed to sit in, but this was turned down. The Advisory Board is providing a very positive liason between the school and the community.The Board is very serious and they have accepted their responsibilities. They have organized themselves to the point where they are not at all afraid to assert themselves and to make their position clear on issues which they'feel are within their jurisdiction.

The Protect Board

the members of a Board meet in a central location and are responsible for the total complex program. It Is made up of representatives from advisory committees representing each of the complex schools.There are two parents from each school, there is a non-parent or a community representative, there is a teacher from each school, and then there are the two students, one from the junior high and one from the senior high schools, plus the two Headstart representatives, and they use anadministrator and a coordinator. The community is represented

75% in its involvement and so the representation is 75%.They discuss issues at their central meeting which pertain to the complex; they have the right to 131 -126 - set the priorities of the program, they oftentimes request that monies be trans- ferred from one section to another section in order to meet specific needs, and they set the priorities for the next proposal.The proposal which Is being presented to them is an issue which has come about which they will decide upon and discuss, but it contains the elements of decision-making and involvement. One proposal to be presented to the Advisory Board is to have them consider the acceptance of an art-mobile which is a huge trailer or a traveling art gallery on wheels, which is to be used in the complex schools. This requires the use of complex funds to maintain its operation, The decision, it is felt, should be theirs to make if the school system really believes in a decentralized approach and meaningful decision-making.

The Watts Elementary School Ad4sory Committee

The Committee meets every month, once a month. They have elected a Chairman of the Council who is one of the parents. She makes an agenda every month and confers with the principal first, not because she Is forced to, but because she has to know what is going on and she actually adds many items to the agenda her- self. The parents on the Council have been mostly interested in policies of the school -- what the discipline policy is -- and to reinforce this, they want the children to have an education in a calm atmosphere. They are interested in report cards and what the school is doing about that.The school has changed their policy and now writes something to go along with the report cards because the school feels the cards are inadequate, they Just indicate too much failure with no explanation about the children from disadvantaged environments.

The parents want strict discipline, sometimesstricter than the school's positron on discipline.They want their children to be orderly and learning, and they went the children who cannot do this to be removed from the situation so their children have the chance to be able to learn. The school developed a policy with the Council to set up rules, and mailed them out after discussion.

It 1.wrived such things as if a pupil Is In a fight, parents have to bring the 132 -127 - child back to school and have a conference; what the dress code of the school should be; the use of profanity, etc. These rules wele sent home with each child so that parents would know about It and the children were taken to the auditorium in groups and it was explained to them. There was agreement with the Council that there are extenuating circumstances and you can't always follow rules in a routine fashion. The implementation cf the rules and their interpretation was to be left up to the administration of the 'school. As each case comes up in discipline, the school has been keeping a record.When a child Is sent to the office an envelope Is made up and this is a duplicate of the form that is kept in the office and when the child comes back the next time, the school knows what occurred and what was said.As closely as the school can, it sticks to the rules that have been established. It has really helped a great deal and has cut down on pupil fights.

The parents are all for physical punishment of pupils and the principal administers a paddling. The first thing the parents say is "whoop 'em, beat them up, hlt them". In other words, they are used to this at home, but are unaware that it has not worked.The principal finds that the best way to help the problem children is just call the parents and let them do the punishing If that is necessary. He has found cooperation; just one in athousand doesn't cooperate.

He states; "Physical punishment is being phased out slowly, there has been too

much of it, in my opinion, because I don't think it does that much good. Usually you have to do it because you have forgotten to do something else, like good planning and meting the needs of the children. They are frustrated and they do these bad things and you end up smacking them, but after you do that ten times, then that has lost its effectiveness too, and it only makes them bitter and

angry -- that's the way I feel about it working here. And Ireally don't do It much at all."

The PTA, because of their charter, really is not allowed to be an advisory group to the principal. It is more of a welfare type of an organization.The 133 -128-

PTA has a regular PTA program. The principal informs the Committee of these events that are coming up. The Important thing is that they are advising, the advice is being listened to and heard, and the school has learned a lot on the educational side from them about what goes on in the community and they learn from the school and like the school better for It.A couple of the people on the Council were, at one time, very militant in this neighborhood, they had gone to the Board and they were so milltant about some of the things that were happkning.Now they are right on the team so thls is a great benefit for the children.

One Indication that the community might think that the children are doing better is the Peanut Sale. The Peanut Sale for the school got double the amount of money from peanuts sold than ever before at any other drive at the school.

The principal hopes that behind this, is a good feeling for the school and that the parents know the school will help the children with the money taken In.

The children brought in $1257.00 in 9 days selling peanuts. This is an impoverished area -- at least 80-85% of the people are on welfare.They took them to the factories, etc. which the principal discouraged, because he didn't want the children to go door to door, but he knew that they had to have done something like this. Parents were coming in saying they wanted forty cans and that they would take them to work. So this is an indlcation that the parents must have thought it leas worth the trouble to go and do that for the school.

At least 80% of the school area Is on welfare. Most of the children come from broken families. Most of them do not have a father or man in the household.

The householders seem to be mostly women with several llttle children, so that is why they do not work and why they are on welfare. They cannot work when they have babies and the mothers that are working mothers usually have a male in the house. The mothers on welfare are actively involved in the school just as much as the others. In the PTA, the President Is on welfare. On the ;ouncll, of the five people there, two or three are on welfare. Usually they are not able to give the time either, they are on welfare because they have the kids in the 134 -129 - house and they do not have any time to come tothe school. For instance, the

President of the PTA who is on welfare has to pay somebody $1.00 to babysit for her children every time she comes to the school for a meeting.The money comes out of her welfare. Some PTA Presidents are allowed $5.00 a month for expenses.

In the present Federal program, the school is able to buy a lot of materials and equipment that it never could before because there is money for it.

The school has found, to begin with that it has a very low reading level, and very low math level so there are innovating programs to upgrade curriculum and to bring the reading level up. They are doing this through testing and through departmentalized reading in the upper grades, with the result that these pupils are at least two years behind national reading norms, particularly in the upper grades. At the primary level, the children are already at the lower level and there is not much lattitude in being dropped. Now they are getting the benefit of the innovating programs wfiere the upper grade children did not have anything hefore this. They had classrooms with 39 in an old building and there is quite a difference between the sixth graders now and what the second graders have had.

The teachers, however, are noticing that the children are showing progress -- this Is Just on the teacher evaluation level which can be a valid type of evaluation.

Before the school had a full time librarian, the children were not able to use the library as often as they are now. The school has a teacher - librarian who gives a prepared lesson and the children are able to take books back to their classroom for use. Also, as a part of the departmentalization, in the morning the librarian is in charge of individualized reading and she takes about 22 of the top readers reading seventh grade or above for individualized help every morning from about 9:10 to 10:20. Taking books home is not encouraged at the moment, but the school is looking forward to being able to do this.

The principal pointed out some things that they do. "First of all, with some of our funds at various times, we have bought paperback books and put them into the classrooms, the teachers will allow them to take the books hone and if they 135 -130 - get lost, so what?Another thing was that a year ago, a wonderful thing happened that has not happened in many schools -- an outfit called the Book Lift Fund came here and they were Just great. It IF a charitable organization that collects funds and they came here and we had a Fair, like a Book Fair. The parents came and helped stamp these books, three for each child in the school. The parents donated cookies and gave the child a bag of cookies, so it was like a party.

We set up a room with these approximately 1500 volumes, we had 500 children, and each child went in by grade level and chose three volumes that Were there that they wanted.They took them home In the bag with the cookies and it was theirs to keep. This, to me, was a great motivation forreading, and the children were really thrilled. The fifth and sixth graders as one of their three books could take a dictionary, and some of them were just really thrilled at getting their own dictionary. So this type of thing -- if they could expand

something like this -- there Is money around for many things, I think this would be a great motivation for better reading.And there are so many homes that do not provide this at home so maybe the government or schools should help them to get more books, because the children want them."

136 -131 - A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES

I. Racial Comoosition and Population Size

Size of metropolitan area Zilaaajaprps))1(22c.-11_,

Size of the city of Los Angeles 2.964.365 (Approx. - 1969)

Percent Negro in Metropolitan area 11% (780,000 Aporox..2_192).____

Percent Negro in Los Angeles 1950 171.209 (11.9%)

1965 454,623 (16.66%)

1970 (est) 611.845 (20.64%)

1980 (est) 874.460 125.73%)

Negro as Percent of Non-white 1950 (80.91): 1960 (80.27): 1965 (82,90); 19_70_1_86,BY; 198_QA89.98/,

II. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population In tracts with 95% Negro

1965

1960 10.=

i950 7,72%

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 70% Negro

1965

1960 59.44%

1950 53,25%

Comments:

I. Figures for 1965, 1970, and 1980 % Negroes In the City of Los

Angeles are based on the projections calculated by the Systems and Data Services

Division of the City Planning Department.

II, 1965 data not available in Part 11(racial distribution).

137 -132- massfteayllyBear-olggiALLIargAIninreas

District Percent Negro Density Median remily % Below Income Poverty Level

Urban Employment Survey Area* 73,24% 20.6/A $5,900 I) 45.85% Negro only below $5,000

2) 24.65% below $3,500

Additional Facts concerning the High Negro Qensity Areas:*

Median Family Income in year 15,00

Size of area x,160 acres

Population 65,235

Number of elementary schools in area

0011;Iguency rate

Population Density 20,6 persons/acre

School enrollment Unemployment .Appro4,...16,2%,/ (Includes ajlag2Lgsons)______Public Welfare income Level

Out of school youth

* See Urban Employment Survey conducted In Los Angeles during period July 1968 June 1969.

138 -133- Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000

Unemployment rates in the County of Los Angeles (1968 annual average)

Area Average pon-Whlte ...it.C.

Los Angeles - Long Beach S.M.S.A. 4.7 8.5 4.2

Suburban Ring 4.3 9.0 4.0

Central City 5.4 8.6 4.6

C.E.P. Areal 10.3 16.2 6.12

Comments:

1C.E.P. area figures are for June 1968-July 1969 (See map for L.E.P. areas)

2Spanlsh-American only.

139 -134- A PROFILE OF THE LOS ANGELES SCHOOL SYSTEM

1. Size of the System

Total number of schools 559 date September, 1969 , (Does not No. of elementary sc:lools e35 date September. (include (special edu- No. of junior high schools 76 September, 1969 (cation schools (crippled, No. of Senior High schools 48 date September. 19.62, (etc.

II. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff* and Students

A. Staff

Negro (dlst.-wide, incl.sp. ed.) 3936 14.5

4egroes in white schools DNA

Negroes in Negro schools DNA

In elementary schools 2417 17.9

In junior High schools 801 13.0

In Senior High schools 533 8.8

Certified personnel 27,134

Classroom teachers DNA

Ratio pupils /teachers (elem.)

(sea.)

Mean years experience (teachers)

% first year teachers

% non-degree

% B.A.

% M.A.

Salary - minimum (Bach)

maximum (each)

140 -135-

B. Students

Negro enrollment in elementary schools: **

ea r ha,

1967 83,759 23.9

1968 90,773 24.5

1969 90,552 24.9

Autober of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools:

Year tio.

NONE

CommenLs:

Note: The City of tos Angeles and the Los Angeles Unified School

District are not coterminous.The School District includes several other municipalities.

* "instructional staff" as defined in OCR Racial S Ethnic Survey, Fall, 1968.

** Because of differences in data collection requirements, data are not entirely comparable from year to

141 -136-

Student Performance

Test Score (date: City-Wide Data ,(Standard!zedl Raw Score Nat'l Percentile

Grade 2 (5/69 - Stanf. Read.) 34.58 23

Grade 4 DNA

Grade 6 (11/68 - Stanf. Read.) 44.50 24

Grade 8DNA

Stanford Reading Achievement

End of 3rd Year (5/69) 56.83 24

End of 6th YearDNA

C. School Board

Method of selection: Election at large by voters of school district.

Number of Negroes on School Board: None

Members ...Di tbelQs Angeles Board of Education

142 -137 -

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON LOS ANGELES

Los Angeles Planning Department, Los Census, June 1, 1969.

Los Angeles Planning Department, Population Estimate and Housing Inventory as of April 1. 1969.

Los Angeles Community Analysis Bureau, Moustng Segre.gation and Changes In Minority Concentrations, August I, 1969.

Stambier, Howard V., "New Directions in Area Labor Force Statistics", Monthly Labor Review, August, 1969.

U.S. Department of Labor, Jureau of Labor Statistics, Pacific Region, "Urban Employment Survey", October 1969

U.S. Bureau of the Census, "Characteristics of the South and East Los Angeles Areas", 1965.

143 CHAPTER 6

ATTITUDES ABOUT DECENTRALIZED AND COMMUNITY

CONTROLLED SCHOO!S: OAKLAND

Introduction

The city of Oakland is characterized by a rapid growth in Its Negro population

In the years from 1940 to 1970.Today this Negro population constitto.es 34% of the city's population. Unemployment rates are unusually high for this population group, running about 20% as over against 11% for the white population. This large, impoverished Negro population is concentrated in a few sections of the city, resulting in an unbalanced school population whereby one high school has grown in the past seven years to a Negro pupil concentration of 72X.

The city's school system is dominated by a conservative segment of the upper socio-economic elements of the city.While there are two Negroes on the Board, the strong militant black faction of the city find them unacceptable representatives of the Negro community. The school system itself has not been overly responsive to educational change.As a matter of fact, the various social and economic minorities have criticized the Board and the dty school administration for resisting experiments of any kind including even a survey of its activities and responses to the decentralization community control movement.

The Oakland School Board members, while aware of the demands for decentralization and community control, remain attached to the concept of centralized school control. However, the School Board has established a community control program for one of its all-black schools. The Board retains ultimate legal control, is

is the case in such cities as Chicago, and Washington, D.C.The Board's position on decentralization as a whole, and the experiment on community control In West

Oakland, is supported by the California Teachers Association.

Change In the Oakland School System has come to be viewed as a power struggle around racial issues. This situation is so much In contrast with the Los Angeles 144 -139 -

School system in the some city. The school administration in Los Angeles has been Innovative and experimental developing programs and assigning skilled staff to assist schools. Oakland, on the other hand, seems to be frozen Into a motion- less stance around conflicting ideologies resulting in very little, if any, movement towards educational change.

Social and EconomIc_Chanciesi

The city of Oakland is, like many other American cities, a partially decayed industrial town of sharp contrasts: great afflueAce and serious poverty, both stability and transiency, progress for some and retrogression for some, with much controversy over programs for urban developirent, education, and many other phases of the city's life, all complicated by severe class and racial tensions. The cleavage between the haves -- largely white -- and the have-nots -- largely blacks and Mexican Americans -- Is fairly serious, and there is very little evidence of either side seeing the world from the point of view of the other.

There has been a continuous exodus from the city by the white middle-class, and a corresponding increase in the non-white population.

Between 1940 and 1960, the number of Negroes Increased tenfold, from 8642 to 83,618 or from 2 percent to 22.8 percent, and Is currently about 34 percent of the population. In that same period, 53,000 whites left the city and 36,000 blacks moved. into Oakland. Though it Is difficult to know whether this same trend is continuing, It is a fact that the percenteoe of black students enrolled

In the schools is steadily increasing. 1960 Census data Indicated that some

43,000 adults in the city had less than an 8th grade education. Of these, about

17,000 had not gone beyond the fourth grade. School drop-outs and immigration continue to add to the numbers of the inadequately educated.

Unemployment rates have been consistently high in the last eecade. In 1964, the Federal Area Redevelopment Agency declared Oakland e depressed area on the

'This section has been prepared In the course of this study by GlenP. Nimnichtof the Educational Rese.rch and Development Institute, Inc. 145 -140 - basis of the high unemployment rate. At the time, it was the only urban area west of the Mississippi River to be so designated. In June, 1964, overall unemployment figures for Oakland were estimated i)t11 percent, but for the non-white population the figure was over 20%. This unemployment Is concentraced among the younger medbers of the population and was heavier among women than among men.

A are number of these unemployed are heads of households. It has been estimated that between 20 and 30 percent of the unemployed minority population could be capable of working at higher levels of skills, responsibility, and salary. Com- pounding the situation, it appears that unemployed persons in Oakland are unemployed for longer periods of time than is the case in other cities. There is little immediate hope for any change in this picture.

Oakland has always had substantial numbers of various minority groups, and in many ways is similar to the State of California as a whole. But the situtation of many of the oewer Negro residents is much more serious than that of earlier disadvantaged minorities.Their numbers and concentration, the damaging effects of a history of discriminatory treatment and lack of opportunity, along with the increased training and skills demanded by employers constitute a critical and urgent problem.

The effects of this situation on the educational picture are not difficult to foretell. The concentration of large proportions of Negroes in certain parts of the city affect the racial balance In the schools. In 1940, severe racial imbalance affected a small number of schools in western Oakland. By 1960, this condition had spread north into Berkeley and south to the city limits, where large concentrations of Negroes live. One effect of this concentration is indicated in the change of one high school (Castlemont) population from 44 percent

Negro students in 1963 to 72 percent In 1965.

146 -141-

Oakland School District

There are 64,000 students from kindergarten to 12th grade in 88 school buildings.

The schools are governed by an elected Board of Education ofseven members who for- mulate policy for the schools, which are administered by a Superintendent. There are 65 K - 6 elementary schools, 15 7 - 9 junior high schools, six 10 - 12 senior high schools, two continuation high schools, an adult center, three evening adult schools, one development center for handicapped minors, and 14 children's centers, as well as special schools for the physically handicapped, the trainable mentally retarded, and the deaf and hard-of-hearing. Average daily attendance is 63,484, but both enrollment and attendance are declining. The student population is 55 percent black, 5 percent Oriental, 8 percent Mexican-American, and 32 percent white.

Approximately 12,000 students are from homes receiving public assistance.

Class size averages about 10 percent higher than the acceptable standard, and

the high school counseling ratio is I to 500, nearly twice that of accepted standards. Because of financial limitations, 3000 students in 19 schools were on double sessions in the primary grades in 1968-69.Several state and federal programs have supported special programs in the schools but so far with little tangible result. Recently, it was revealed that federal funds Intended for programs for disadvantaged students had been misused, wasted, or diverted from the poor to the general funds of the district. This, In the face of a situation where 37 percent of the students In the elementary schools are reading one or more years below grade level, and about half the students are considered educationally disadvantaged.

Morale In the city's schools is quite poor. Confrontations by individuals and groups are common, physical violence is common, vandalism and arson are increasing, absence and truancy are growing, respect cor authority decreasing, teacher resig- nations increasing.

Board of Education members In the city have traditionall,. been members of the dominant white upper middle class establishment. They include an executive 147 -142 - of a large food chain, an official of the Alameda County Health Department, and several lawyers. Though there are two Negroes on the current board, the more militant blacks of Oakland do not consider them to be spokesmen for their community.

Though Board members are elected by the voters of Oakland, the usual practice is for a member to resign sometime 3 to 12 weeks before the end of his term. At this point, a replacement is selected by the Board to fill out the term. This individual is then the incumbent in the next election, and generally wins out over any challenger. At the present time, five of the seven 8card members are Republi- cans and two are Democrats.

It is the feeling of those working for basic change in the educational structure that the Board, despite many public statements about the need for change, constitutes one of the most obdurate groups blocking significant change, at least the kind that would be truly responsive to the needs of minority students. The system as a whole has a reputation for being backward and has strongly resisted educational experments of any kind.

The operating procedures of the Board in the search for a new superintendent

In the last year is a typical example. At the resignation of Stuart Phillips, a selection committee of eminent persons from the University of California and elsewhere was formed to search for a new superintendent. Eighty candidates were screened, but the Board selected Dr. James I. Mason, then superintendent of schools

in Las Vegas who had not been Included in the screening process. He was approved unanimously in a Board session lasting less than five minutes, and allowing for no debate and at a salary $4,500 above the budget allotment.Immedlately after this announcement, stories of a conflict-of-interest suit against Dr. Mason were made public. Teachers' union officials had revested that action on the appointment be delayed until teacher organizations, school-community councils, and student organizations had been consulted. One Board member said there had never been any

Intention to Involve the community In the selection process. However, the Board did withdraw the offer of the superintendency because of public reactions to the 148 -143 -

disclosure that Dr. Mason had accepted en honorarium from a textbook company after

his school district had purchased $1 million worth of books from the company.

Another superintendent, Dr. Ercell Watson, was selected, this time a black,

from Trenton, New Jersey, a community very similar to Oakland. Though the militant

Black Caucus approved of this selection after severe! Cau,-u nerbers had talked with

him, they continued to condemn the doard's "secret negotiations" by which he was chosen. Dr. Watson, however, declined to come to Oakland because of his commitment

to stay in Trenton. At this point, November, 1969, the Black Caucus called for the establishment of a process by which the community can be involved in the selection of a new superintendent. To date, no new candidate has been proposed.

Bond issue

Because California State law requires all school districts to bring schools built before 1933 up to specific earthquake standards, Oakland oust finance building modifications that could cost up to $28.5 million through a bond election. In addition to this, a second bond election in 1972 totalling $21.9 million for improvement of an additional ten schools now classified as "least structurally inadequate" may develop. However, architects who have prepared studies of the various school

sites have indicated that in many cases the cost of structural work and m,-ernization

would be greater than the outright demclition of existing structures and building

new schools. In the face of this situation, there is some concern about population

shifts In the city, and one Board member said that because of the need for desegre-

gation, it may be that what is being looked at today in school planning may not be

the issues to be placed before the voters,

In an attempt to develop city-wide support for the passage of such bond issues,

the Oakland school establishment has fostered the development of school community

relations advisory councils In each elementary and secondary school in the city.

Council members are appointed by principals of each school working through the

PTA's. It is these groups which are looked to by the Board as their liaison with

the community. 149 -144 - Attitudes Toward Community Control of Schc3is in Oakland

When the si.,rvey was first planned by a group including the school director, a teacher, and four students, it was decided to Interview a sampling of all persons

in the school district, i.e., Board members, principals, teachers, and students.

Permission was requested from the Superintendent's Office to enter the schools for the purpose of talking to students, teachers and principals. The Acting Superin- tendent, however, denied tl .s permission "in light of the district's heavy involvement in our own evaluation programs as well as with otherresearch studies, we do not feel that we can ask our personnel to participate in another study at this time."

It was decided, then, that Bay High School students would interview Oakland

High School students after school and just off the school grounds, that a few teachers could be interviewed through the Oakland Federation of Teachers, the most militant union group, and that members would be interviewed individually by telephone. The results of this interviewing follows.

§chool_kokrd Members

Each member of the school board was interviewed by telephone about community controlled schools. In addition, a public meeting of the school board was attended in November, 1969, at which the Board formally approved a partially community- controlled program for one of the Oakland High Schooh(McClymonds High School, an all-black school In West Oakland with a high drop-out rate and notoriously poor morale). At the meeting the Board voted unanimously to approve the McCiymorxis

Project essentially as presented by the consulting firm (black-owned) which developer the plan. The only objection to the plan came from an Irate group of McCiymonds teachers, both black and white, who protested vigorously about the fact that the staff and students at McCiymonds had never been consulted, about the proposed program.

Board members were asked to respond to the following questions: What is your understanding o' the nature of a community controlled school? Has this kind of a 150 -14+5 -

school arrangement been seriously discussed by tne Oakland School Board? If yes,

what were the reactions of the Board members? Would you support community schools

in Oakland?Why?

All Board members realized that community control of large city school districts

was being demanded and all accepted thls as the next stage of organization of such

systems. However, their answers to the first question of what they understand as

a community controlled school varied from those who believed control should be given

outright to neighborhood groups, including control over hiring and firing of

teachers, educational policies, and fiscal matters, to those who felt that many

variations between partial and full control were possible, with one member (con-

sidered the most liberal member) saying that he would !Ike to see a gradual trans-

fer cf control from the central board to neighborhood groups. He would favor cen-

tral board control urtil such time as the local group was "ready" to handle thelr

own affairs. Most of the Board members recognized the need for more involvement

by parents in school affairs generally.However, almost every member stressed the

feet that under existing laws, control of t'e schools was the legal responsibility

of th central bard, and until such time as that was charged, they could do nothing

to move toward neighborhood control. There was, in short, no willingness to help

the process of change move more quickly and smoothly.

One %bite member felt that Oakland schools were, in fact, community controlled

right now.He would not support community control because those who control must

report to the community and the community must be able to change the controlling

individual by elections, and he said any other ad hoc arrangement would be abhorrent

to him.

All Board members felt that the HcClymonds Project was a solid first step toward community control of schools, though in this case, the Board still assumes

ultimate responsibility for the program, Including those parts of the program involving University of Calirornia professional persons and students. Ole Board member acknowledged the fact that the schools were not producing quality products 151 -146 - and that this situation would be changed when all elements in the community were involved in school operations.

Most of the members indicated that community control had not come up as a topic for Board discussion prior to consideration of the McCiymonds plan which is considered a transitional phase between full board control and complete community control. But, two of those interviewed indicated that the Board is currently opposed to community control.

Teacher Attitudes

Because official permission to interview teachers and principals in their schools was withheld by the Acting Superintendent, the only group of teachers whom we were able to talk to were union members. In a telephone conversation with union leaders, the following responses were elicited:

The president of the small (30 members) Independent Classroom Teachers Associ- ation, which was originally organized to deal with teacher grievances, said: "Any- thing designed Wbreak up a s'd-moving, conservacive school board is in the right direction. White teachers want job security. They see what happened in New York, and they would want to make sure that situation would not be rep'ated. i am not sure whet can be done, but firing of teachers could not bo controlled only by the community board. The teachers would probably t...a happier if there were some other way to give a greater voice to blacks."

Oakia-d Education Association, an affiliation of the California Teachers

Association, an NEA group, takes a generally pro-Board position.

At a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Oakland Federation of Teachers, teachers were asked, "What is your understanding of a community controlled school?

Has it been discussed In your school?Would you like to see Oakland create community schools? Why? Would you like to teach in a community controlled school?

These teachers are a very select group of Oakland's teachers -- predominantly forward-looking, articulate, well-Informed, NIlitant teachers with a large proportion of young members In their ranks. 152 -10

Ail the teachers in thir. group said they were for community controlled schools.

Only a few indicated it had peen discussed in their schools, either in any formal

way 01.k:formally. McClymonds teachers said the current project had been exten-

sively discussed.A couple of the teachers indicated that they thought students

should be Included on the community boards.All the teachers in this group feel

that community control would be superior tothe bureaucratic control, but some of

the younger, more sophisticated teachers were aware of the fact that as v.hites,

they would probably be out of jobs, or if not, that they would have serious con-

flicts with the more traditional black parents in control of school policy.How-

ever, all the teachers felt that parents should be far more in touch with and in

control of what happens in the schools.

Again, It should be borne in mind that this was by no means a representative

sample of teacher opinions throughout the district.

Though it was our intention to include principals in the survey, none was

actually contacted because of the restriction on going into the schools.

student Attitudes

Again, because interviewing within the school grounds was not possil)le, Bay

High School student interviewers were restricted to after school hours near school

buildings. Four students Interviewed a total of about 60 students In High Schools

representing the entire spectrum of student population, from 99% black to a p.e-

dominantly white Oakland High School,

At Skyline High School (mainly middle class white), the responsei from the

students indicated that none of them had ever heard of community controlled schools,

but all felt that it was a good idea when it was ,xplained to them. One respondent

felt that the students, too, should be Involved In any kind of community control.

Respondents from this school Included the entire range of Oakland High School youth,

from white middle class to black ghetto students who attend this school in the hills.

Thirty-five Oakland High School students in 10th and lith grades responded to

the question of "What do you think of community controlled schools?" as follows: 153 -148-

30 students did not know what it meant but when the term was explained, they said they were in favor of such an arrangement,A few expressed skepticism about when such an arrangement might take place, and none seemed to think It would happen while they were in 1th school.Five of the respondents felt that control should be retained by the school board.

At McClymonds High School, 18 students responded to the interviewer, a former student there himself. None had ever heard the term before.None of them knew that their school was about to become the first in the city for an experiment in community control. One very militant student said he would be in favor of it so long as black people had full control. Three people did not have enough education to take over control of their schools.Eight students really discussed the idea,

Many felt that it might notwork because parents might be domineering at home about school affairs. These students did-lit want to be bussed In school buses, but preferred to have lowered prices on commercial transportation. One student thought parents needed guidance at first from outside by a black person not previously associated with Oakland schools. None of the students wanted an integrated school situation.

In a discussion of this plan in October, 1969, the Board unanimously approved the plan, but several members brought up questions about the plan. One Negro Board member questioned whether every student at McClymonds would want to be involved

In this program. Another Negro member wanted assurance that the money for the project would not be cut off at some early point. He also wanted to know whether

Oakland industries were involved in sustaining the program in the event that government funds were withheld.One member questioned the procedure for parental

Involvement in the program.

Several members of the MCCIymonds High School faculty attended the meeting and vigorously protested the proceedings.They had not seen a copy of the plan.

They hdd not been consulted in any way by Social Dynamics, the group that had written the proposal, nor by the Board -4 Education. They objected to the 154 -149 - characterization of McClymonds as having 85% drop-out-prone students; they objected to the school being used repeatedly for experimental plans developed by outsiders, all of which had failed, leaving the faculty and students to clean up the pieces; and most importantly, they raised the question of whether ox plan can succeed on the high school level with students whose elementary education had been so inadequate and pleaded for a comprehensive change in the entire structure and policy of the Oakland schools.

Black Caucus

The Black Caucus is an organization comprised of at least 40 East Bay civil rights and community organizations, including such groups as NAACP and CORE. On the issue of a new superintendent for Oakland, the Caucus had demanded the following qualifications for any appointee: He must favor community control of the schools.

He must have "Positive Attitudes" on the Black Student Union.He must be in favor of mandatory black student programs. He must be sympathetic to letting out con- tracts to black contractors and favor in-house promotions of black teachers and administrators. He must seek a mandate of support from the Board to have a free hand to fashion a new school program in Oakland. And he must be reviewed, screened, and approved by the Black Caucus and local Black Student Unions.

Position of Mrs. Electra Price

Mrs. Price Is an extremely knowledgeable black woman who has twice run for the school board (and been twice defeated), and who serves as consultant for the

Black Caucus. Her views on community controlled schools are therefore, of special

Importance.

She believes, first, that it Is unlikely that she will see in her lifetime a truly community controlled situation in Oakland. It is her contention that any arrangement short of giving the money directly to community groups to run :heir school, will be doomed to failure.

She is fully aware of the many problems tat will be faced by a community group. For one, many black parents do not feel that they are qualified to prescribe 155 -150- cducational programs for their children. They do not want to administer the programs on a day-to-day basis, but, rather, want to have a voice in policies governing the school. She stated flatly that community control of schools does not necessarily mean better education for the children in those schools. The issue at hand Is whether the control is in the hands of people who are concerned about the education of children. Sbe sees the problem In American education generally as how to educate the non-elite. Education has been designed primarily for those who will accept the estabiishment for what it is.

The fear of many who are resisting the changeover in control of the schools

(and in other areas as well) stems from the fear that black people and other minority groups will use their power as white power has been used.She feels this will not happen with black people given all the other problems they will have to face.

156 -151-

A PROFILE OF THE CICY OF OAKLAND

I. Racial Composition and Population Size

Size of Metropolitan area9 counties of BayArea-

Alameda & Contra Costa Cvs - 1,448,400 (I/70)

Size of the city of Oakland 385,700 (1218)

Percent Negro in metropolitan area 57.3% Alameda-Contra Costa

Percent Negro In Oakland 1950 12.4%_- 47-562

1960 22.8 - 83.618

1966 30% - 110,100

1970 (est) 35 - 39%

1980 (est)

Negro as percent of Non-white (1960) 26.4% non-white_22.8% Negro

Ii. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 95% Negro

1960 270.523 blacks in Oakland - 367.548 whites

There were no census tracts with 95% Negro in either the 1950 or 1960 census figures. No projections had been made for 1965 for Oakland.

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 7096 Negro

1950 25.630 Negroes, or 5X, lived in areas of 70%+ Negro population.

1960 167.068 Negroes. or 62%. lived in areas of 5 + Negro population.

In 1960 there were no areas (census tracts) with 95% or more Negro population.

Comments:

157 -152 -

Most Heavily Negro Social Planning Areas

District Percent Negro Density Median Family % Below Income Poverty Level

i966 12§2 Model Cities areas 86,090 of $4906 all 2218 households A B C D 142,058 or No exact N. families out of 25,539 61X figures in Oakland households 9% 13% overcrowded 90.3% houses built before 1939. Low - $.2719 High - $6228 in target areas

Additional Facts concerning the High Negro Density_A eas:

Median Family income in year $6087 (1966)___

Size of area 40 to 60% of city size

Population 142,057

Number of elementary schools in area LI__

Delinquency rateTotal number of Juveniles referred to Probation Dept. (1965)

2,431 or 16,7% .___Total over 18 deferred in 1964 - 28.418 or 24.2 .

Population Density 1966 target areas - 4530 households had 6 or more persons

(Oakland total 6160)

School Enrollment 24.908

Unemployment in all target areas 4.890 or 14.3%

Public Welfare no figures available income Level 1966 - all target areasala+0 families. 180 families under $1000

to 60 families at $25.000 and over.

Out of School youth no figures avallabln

158 -153-

$11. Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard 13,343 or 38%

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000

86090 persons

Unemployment rates in the City of Oakland

pate Average Negro White

1966 8 12.9 5.94

Target areas for Model Cities project area - 14.7% both men and women

Comments;

These figures are from the Application for Planning Grant Model

Cities Program, City of Oakland, April 3, 1967.

159 ------

-154 - Unemployment Rates foLOakland by Sex. Race, Las, and Area of City. 1966

Percent of Civilian Labor Force Unemployed Total Target Other Population Groups Oakland, Areas Areas

All Persons 0.0 13.1 5.3

By Sex Male 6.4 10.6 4.3 Female 10.1 16.3 6.8

By Race White, excluding Mexican American 5.9 10.6 4.4 Mexican American 9.9 14.9 a Negro 12.9 14.7 7.4

By Age Persons 14 to 19 years old 31.0 41.2 25.0 Persons 20 to 24 years old 10.5 17.9 6.9 Persons 25 to 34 years old 6.8 12.3 3.7 Persons 35 to 44 years old 6.2 10.0 4.0 Persons 45 to 64 years old 3.8 6.9 2.5 Persons 65 years old and over 2.8 a a

8Sample of insufficleot size to provide meaningful rate for category.

Despite the small loss in total population that occurred between 1960 and 1966, the city's resident labor force Increased by 6,700 people. Durlrg the past six years, the male labor force fell by just over four percent, while the female labor force grew nearly 20 percent. In addition, the unemployment rate for males dropped slightly, while the female unemployment rate rose by over one-half. While specific percentages for the Target Areas,' of which the Model City area is a part, are different, the pattern

41thin the Target Areas of the city live 80 percent of all Negro residents of the city, 70 percent of all white residents of Mexican descent, and 40 percent of all other nonwhite residents.

160 -155-

A PROFILE OF THE OAKLAND SCHOOL SYSTEM

I. Size of the System

Total number of schools 90 date October. 1969

No. of elementary schools 67 date October 1969

No. of Junior schools lc date October I969

No. of Senior High Schools 8 date October. 1968

11. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff and Students

A. Staff

Negro

Negroes In white schools

In elementary schools NO RUN AVAILABLE In Senior High Schools

Certified personnel

Classroom teachers

Ratio pupils /teachers (elem.)

(sec.)

Mean years experience (teachers)

% first year teachers

% non-degree

% B.A.

% M.A.

Salary - minimum (Bach)

maximum (B,ch)

161 -156-

8. Students

Negro enrollment in elementary schoola:

Year No.

October, 1969 20,749 57.4

Number of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools:

Year liz.

October-0969 13,408 92

Comments:

State definition of unbalanced school is one In vilich there is

15% or more beyond the proportion of the minority group in the

nelghborhcmd.

162 -157-

Student Performance

Test Score (date: Schools 95-10014 White (Standardized) --82919---

Grade 2

Grade 4

Grade 6

Grade 8

Stanford Agadinci Achievement

End of 3rd Year

End of 6th Year

C. School Board

Method of selection: Elected city-wide

Number of Negroes on School Board: Two

Members of the Oakland Board of Education

Melvin J. Caughell

Charles W. Coady

Barney E. Hilburn

Lorenzo N. Hoopes

Carl B. Munck.

Seymour M. Rose

Hrs. Ann Cornielle, President

163 gx-n8Rzl=n=8=ngnmm:. =S,T.i=17..t=2,7gi;1=7,2;2=-4,1=2:=2:;:=2 ...... &&r.g&&V;SZ:ggg==&:=MS:g&ng&t.Tgt&M&MM=IM=St:t:ge= . . r7g . mmmm ,,m.,!,...,.,. .41,c, . ... . ,r ...... , ...... -....,..,+,,,.. .. ' ... . , 14 P., .i.a.,..6.6..; .... 4..4...... i.....w...... wi .. .;

.S. 9K...... ,..4..! ..... ,....,..,

.- 13. CC= 13 FO 6wi . ..6.4,i.6.6 . wiwl.iwiwivantrwnwl.lei.iwi .. wi . wit.i.i.wi...... 4.4.44,1 .. win. ..: ... i .034 EQ '' OC=M r, _ ...... ft,-.....ftoo ...... ! ...... 0, ...... m.- i.,ririe.i..4a-inniwt,en.....ei % .1;_ 1.ZZ.t. wieif4,46.-E.i6.4....irieiri,i6 .. 6.4einni,6.4e44.4.4 . nme.m.*;nri .. no4 .. .-i .. e;ri . ....-3ein mz,i oaw F.iria-i=iricimeivimvirierisitiviririmricirimnriri.c.eiei . eirieinnew, 4

(1) ,,, ...0,..,..e.m ..... OP..Nwmme...... , .. flo...... mmoww.r..no.-.4,...... , cx mr,rimmr.ftc..ne.c...... m.o- . 4...... e,c4c4r,g,e.ftnie...e.m,..c...... :,....t: 17.7=1 E-" .1.,^, --.a Vt cio:r:0404e:e4c.r:r .. e4r4r:rieice.,-4 -..;=; . ,,; . ,,,,,..,,;,,,..rin V co !.1-.,n, ngnr,=== .. =====n-======rt , ..1 rt,t.f_ rotr-.=rr.,r,rrotrrrrr . rrrrrrr.Irre . r7,,,...,, . r . r 7r.rrrrrr D I!- tr.o J :,* Z51 r . r ... r-rrr.c!rr,.>rrrrrrrr-- ..!..40 ...pr. ... .! .. va.e.e..!47 . .e.00,,..q4e47 .5-: 6 ,..t- t4 4%16 N /3 Es ri:...,___-_ g___,g=.t-47,...:!...;=7:;=%...22rx.,7A. ert.62 ...v1.%--ts,,0_,,-.29,1-:,1..c1-_-1-1-2,1_.....__-.,,trI,1-___ Er= , .... --00...m...... ;...... ,..m.,...... nelea E r- -158-

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alameda County Growth indices, Air Transportation, Finance, Real Estate, Building and Construction, Utilities, Transportation. Oakland Chamber of Commerce, March, 1969.

Plamada County Profile, Alameda County Human Relations Commission, December 30, 1969.

Alliance For Community_glImgation at Malymonds HighSrhool Dropput_Preention aglagi. Title VIII of Public Law 90-247 Social Dynamics, Incorporated, Consultant and the Oakland Unified School District, November, 1969.

Analysis of Federal Decision Making and Impact:The Feder& Government in

Oakland. Vol I and II. Oakland Task Force, San Francisco Federal Executive Board. July 1969. gibliograohy - Research studies on Oakland (Collection from an unpublished manuscript) Electra Price

Budget Sundry - City of Oakland 1969,:22 Prepared by Jerome Keithly, City Manager and Staff

Board Meetiga; and Mernbersiand City Government, City Clerk, Gladys Murphy. April through Octiver, 1969.

California Voice, E. A. Daly, Editor. (Weekly Black Newspaper)

Central District-Urban Renewal Plan, Redevelopment Agency-Oakland, May 27, 1969

Characteristics of the Population of Oakland, California 1966, Prepared for the Department of Employment - State of California. 701 Sample Census of Oakland Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. December 2, 1966. William L. Nichols, li, Study Director.

Comparative Data. Nine Bay Area Counties and Metropolitan Areas, Current information on the most significant measures of economic activity effecting growth and development of the Bay Area Counties. Research Department, Oakland Chamber of Conneme, 1969.

Community Leaders - City of Oakland (unpublished research).

Liesresslorartuly.Special Report - Urban Problems and Civil Disorders, Congressional Quarterly Service, Washington, D.C., September 8, 1969. crime and Juvenile Delinquency -City Wide, Target Areas.Oakland Model Cities Proposal, 1967.

Digest of Current Federal Progrems in the City of Oakland October 1969. Prepared for Mayor John H. Reading by Jeffery L. Pressman with the assistance of the Redevelopment Agency and the City of Oakland.

Ethnic Census - Oakland Public Schools. Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High. October, 1969, Oakland Unifird School Dist-ict. 165 -159-

Federal Information System. County Compiled Nr the Executive Office of the President by the Office of Economic Opportunity.

Fifty Largest Private and Governmental Employers in Alameda County, December 1965 Research Department - Oakland Chamber of Commerce. falui The People...A, All The People. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1969. A Report on Equal Opportunity in State and Local Government Employment.

Major Occupational Categories Within Maior Industry Groups. Non-Agricultural Wage and Salary Workers.Alair.tda County, July 1966, Percent Distribution. East Bay Manpower Survey, Alameda County 1966-1977 California Department of Employment. OakiLrid 701 Protect.

Manpower Commission Final Report Summary of Findings. Contract No. 7-35214, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Technical Assistance Project.City of Oakland, California, Manpower Commission, October 1968.

Manpower Commission Final Report, Contract NO. 7-35214. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Oepartment of Commerce, Technical Assistance Project, Dissolution of Commission, City of Oakland, California, Manpower Commission, May, 1969.

Maps -Attendance Areas.Oakland Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School. Oakland Unified School District, November, 1968.

Haps - Central District Urban Renewal Area, Land Acquisition. Oakland Redevelop- ment Agency, May 23, 1969.

Map - Central District Urban Renewal Area - Land Use Plan Map.Oakidnd Redevelop- ment Agency, May 23, 1969.

Main - City_Couricll DIstrrcts, Oakland Tribune, 1968.

Map: - Housing Conditions 1960. Oakland Redevelopment f.gency, 1967.

Maps - Median Annual Income - 1960, Oakland Rede.lopment Agency, 1967.

Maps - Oakland School Bourdaries_1940-1964. Committee on Oakland Schools, East Bay Conference on Religion and Race, September 29, 1964.

Model Cities Program - City of Oakland. Application for Planning Grant.Oakland Redevelopment Agency, April, 1967.

tiontclarlon - Fred Graeser, Editor (M111 Area Weekly)

Negro lOrket Report - Research Report #1. KOIA Radio Station, Oakland, Oilfornia.

Oakland: A ?emonstration City. Redevelopment Agency, Oakland, California, May 1966.

Oaklani Lawyers Committee Newsletter. October 15, 1969. 160 -160-

Oakland Looks Ahead. The Search For a New Superintendent, Ha-ry McPherson, Advisor, Wilson Riles and William Odell, Associate Advisors. June, 1969.

Oakland Police Department Yearly Statistical Summary, Part 1 and Part 1, Offenses. 1961-1968.

Oakland Post, Thomas Berkey, Editor. (Black Weekly Newspaper)

Oakland Redevelopment News. Quarterly Bulletin. Redevelopment Agency, City of Oakland.

Oakland Tribune - William F. Knowland, Editor (Daily Newspaper)

Organizational_Chart - City of Oakland, Office of the City Manager, 1968.

Outlook - Oakland. Alameda County. Oakland Chamber of Commerce, Vol. XXII, No. 4 October/November 1969. lipp

Riots. Ctyll and Criminal Disorders. Part I. Hearings Before the Permanent Sub- committee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations. United States Senate, Ninetieth Congress First Session. November 1,2,3, and 6,1967. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

San Francisco Chronicle, Daily Newspaper

Plannieljolut111stolisban Educational Problems, an E.S.E.A. Title III Project, June I, 1969, Oakland PuolIc Schools Urban Educational Services. program Needs to Further Quality Education in Oakland - For Study.Oakland Unified School District. Oakland, California, March, 1967.

Press and the 0.E.D.C.I.. The. 1965-1968. Oakland Economic Development Council, Inc., Oakland, California.

Provisional Overall Economic Development Program F07 she City of Oakland.RedevelOp- ment Area Organization, 1964. Oakland, Califoroi. Hospital Services, p. 35.

Racial Comalis ion by Feeder Pattern - OaRand Public Schools.Electra !'rice, December, 1968.

Urban_Health Brochure, West Oakland Health Council, September, 1969, Grand Openlog West Oakland Health Center.

Youth Opportunity Report. Issue: Jobs for Youth Report on 1968 Campaign. City of Oakland. September, 1968.

Youth_Opportunitv Report., Recreation and Leisur^ Programs. Final Summary Report. Prepared by Oakland Recreation Department. September 15, 1969.

inS-1414tic

Poverty and Poverty Programs in Oakland. (Selected results from the 701 household survey of Oakland. Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. William L. Nichoels, II, Study Director. September, 1969.

Oakland,"The Mellovi,C1ty,-wrItten and Illustrated by eighth grade students, 1967-68 of Herbert Hoover Jr. High School. Oakland, 1969. Jenior League of Oakland, Inc. 167 -161-

Oakisnd's Not For Burning, Amory (a dynamic experiment in urban development) Brad,ord. David ompany, Inc., New York, 1968.

Oakland. A_Histor, G. A. Cummings anJ E. S. Pladwell.Grant D. Miller Mortuaries, Inc., Oakland, Calif. 1942. Educaiorit_agela, a report to the ;alifornla St.ite Committee on Public Education.Alan B. Wilson, Arthur R. Jensen, and David L. Elliott. Unlwrsity of Calkfornia, Berkeley, California, December, 1966.

Education inftisland, Jim Power.April, 1967 (Skyline High School Student)

Grants to Schoo Boards to Assist in Dealing with Problems _Incident to Desegregation, Memorandum from David S. Seeley, Director, Equal Educational Opportunities Program. Departmeet of Health. F;Jucation and Welfare, Office of Education, Washington, D.C., January 2.5, 1965.

9igest of Current Federal Programs !n the Cltv_of Oakland. California. Redevelop- ment of tht city of Oakland, August, 1966.

Digest of Current Federal Programs in the City of Oakland, Jeff Pressman (gr2cluate student U.C.) and Redevelopment i.gency, City of Oakland, October, 1966.

Alliance for Community Education of McClymonds High School Oakland. California, a dropout prevention proposal under E.S.E.A. Title VIII. Social Dynamics, Inc., Consult.nts, Ercest G. Howard, President and Oakland Unified School District, Oakland, Calif, November, 1969.

Applications for PlanniNg Grant Model Cities Program, City of Oakland, Redevelopment Agency, Oakland., April 3, 1967.

168 CHAPTER

DETROIT: VOLUNTARY "DECENTRALIZED SCHOOL PLAN"

the city of Detroit's population of one and one-half million Is within a metropolitan areas four and one-quarter million and constitutes one of the major urban areas containing a large and co.,centrated Negro population.The most rapidly growing population segment is the Negro population in the city of

Detroit. While the Negro population constitutes only about 15% of the metropolitan area's population, the 1970 estimated Negro population for Detroit is 43%.

In 1965, Detroit's rapidly growing Negro population constituted only about 30% of the total Detroit population.

More than half (53%) of Detroit's Negro population live in areas which have a Negro population density of 74 or more.The most heavily Negro populated sub-communities range in the percentage below the poverty level( an income level of $3000. or less per year). The median family income for these areas ranges from $2800. to $7200. per year. The population density of these areas ( as measured In terms of persons per residential acre) ranges from 34 to 118. At the same time, the percentage of housing in these areas in "not sound condition" in 1960 ranged from 6% to 43%. It should be noted that the delinquency rate for these same areas ranged from a low of 5% to a high of 28%. In 1964 in the city as a whole, 75% of the welfare case load came from the city's Negro population. These same areas of the city produce nearly 57,000 of the school pupils in the city. Civic leaders and educational leaders have become concerned about the city's school system and its educational effectiveness especially since learning that the sixth grade level of the city's pupils are one year behind In terms of national norms. The concern expresses itself in a worry as to whether their students will be able to compete for jobs 4Ith others if they fail behind educationally.The answer to this by the Board of Education has been that the solution is a political one needing the restructuring of the educational organization os that they can do a better job.The community,

1G9 -1b3- or the militant black segments of it, state the the answer to th, problem of

effective schooling Is community control and providing greater freedom thereby

for imoroving the educational system.Community control, they state, would give

them better education because It would be carried out by the local members of the

community. They argue that the school system as it exists, has been resisting

innovation. An the other hand, civic leavers argue that the community as a whole

is fundamentally not interested In public education and the community has lacked

the support for public education. The proponents of a different political struc-

ture argue that political changes, if they had occurred, would have by now forced a different educational system.They point out the tremendous problems in housing and employment and in the quality of education. They propose that greater and

informal community involvement by members of the community would bring about adequate changes In the scLool system. This arguement Is met by civic leaders who

point out that it is a fact that there has been insufficient support of education and that is the explanation for the educational problems, and the other community

problems. This argument, in turn, is countered by the statement that the ideas

involved in community control will bring about greater community involvement and

thereby greater support ot public education.

The community control people also argue that it is true that the kind of districting for the school system that they went will bring about de facto or will entrench - de facto segregation, and, as a matters fact, even legitimize it.

Povever they state that attempts at integration have failed. They, therefore, claim that the attempts at integration will continue to fall and that the present

schooling In Detroit :s not providing adequate :ducation for the children.They argue, therefore, that not only do they want to try community control, but they are convinced that community control will bring about such changes that improvement will be inevitable. However, at the same kime, they admit that in the Introduction of these changes they have no way of knowing when and if they will get quality education. 170 -164-

They ..iso argue, supported by black members of Detroit's school system, that inexperienced teachers are placed In black schools.They feel, therefore, that involving local people In the community In community control activitio; make the school system more accountable. They also argue that this type of decentralization has a positive effect on teachers, parents and pupils in the school system.

Militant leaders among the school systemq. tf!ach:rs are raising questions about effective teaching. One of the problems that they are concerned with is to study learning processes among Negro children. They state that If language patterns begin at eighteen months of age for a child, then schooling should begin at a much earlier age than now and the learning processes should be studied to determine how best to begin early age learning on the part of Negro children. Tney, ton, are interested In how learning transfers are made on the part of children and how to apply this to black children.Teachers and administrators, they point out, need greater analytical skills for their Jobs anA especially in dealing with

4,1E. ;:o is 3LU4 the sequence of skilled development on the part of children.They claim that one of the failures of the present school system is that teachers don't see themselves

In a total learning situation and a framework of the growth development of children.

Community control leaders argue that the vital factor In community control

Is the power of decision-making. For example, theypolnt out, that Miller Junior

High School serves both a poor+ black area and an affluent area. However, the affluent area residents refuse to send their children to the ghetto school, and their decision in this respect has been abided by. They were concerned that the district boundaries that night come out of the 8111 in the Legislature on decentralization would provide for non-contiguous boundaries and therefore, break up de facto segregation in school districts.They reasoned that, as a result, therefore, they would not be able to elect enough of their own members to control their districts.

171. -i65-

The community control people believe that if you permit the community to be involved through democratic processes that this would enable the schools to function more effectively. At present, they view the school system as cum%ersome because school principals cannot do anything about any of the local problems that arise, whether it is broken windows or sufficient heat for their building. if the system was decentralized and if you had a democratic electoral process, then they would have sufficient power (the principals) to work within and with their local community leaders and make purely local decisions.

Some of the teachers think that many children are incapable of learning. The militant community control leaders disagree. They take the position that children have learaing problems If they have inadequate role models on which to model themselves In developing adequate motivation for learning.They also feel that these same children gro, up in an environment in which they learn in many ways that nelih6- they nor the adults in the community or the teachers have control over the environment In such a way as to affect it significantly and make fundamental decisions. This conception of what they define as "fate control" they view as of utmost importance in influencing the pupils' ability to learn.

They assert that changes in the environment In which there would be adequate

role models, such as competent black male teachers and female teachers and local community control, would bring home to the children the feeling of fate control and with it, sufficient motivation to learn and to achieve.

Within this framework they also view the Detroit school curriculum as completely Inadequate. They see such reading materials as "Dick and Jane at the Beach" or "Dad Coming Home from the Office" as irrelevant materials. They assert that both the reading materials and the tests which are derived from these materials should have black individuals in the illystrations used and the accounts should depict experiences from the black community. They want to see materials of black contributors Integrated into the teaching instruments used In the schools. 172 -166 -

These views, as expressed by militant community control advocates do not stop with a demand for change In the school system, but go on to advocate changes in the police system and the social work system. They are interested, they state, in the child In his total environment and not lust the school environment.They are interested In the total life s*yle of the hdividual awl they assert that their interest derives from a concern about the presently alienated individual in the ghetto community.They state that this problem has to be dealt with first and basically before one can grapple with problems of school achievement.

Under the present circumstances, they assert, the black child starts with

V.)ries about his history and American history which In essence reject him.The black child learns early In his school experiences that he is not an accepted

Individual and that he must accept an inferior role.Ee learns that his black parents have accepted this inferior role and the black parent expresses by his attitudes and behavior, an Inferior role.They want to teach parents and children their conception of Negro history and to reject this inferior role and dead op a self image and self concepts which are within the framework of fate control.

The community control view takes the position that under the present circumstances, neither the school system, the black teacher, or the black professor Is accountable to the black common man.They want to make the black professional, whether he be teacher or professor, accountable to the members of the community, that is, the members of the black community.

School militants are involved in a somewhat different set of questions.They are more concerned about who will be principal, that Is, who will be principal

In a racial sense rather than in a merit sense. Others want principals removed because they are "white;'! They argue that suburban school systems have accountability and they want accountability in the ghetto schools.They want achievement tests for teachers and principals and not Just pupils. They reject analysis which advances the notion that deprivation may interfere with learning, and focus their attention on power as the answer to all learning wld schooling problems.

173 -167 -

One of the results of all this is that it Is claimed that all white principals are frightened and that the black are aware of this. Therefore, this type of

principal will not be an open person. in any case, this type of black leader be-

lieves that the white will not be able to survive in the blackconunnnl ty control

situation and will inevitably leave.To some extent, this is what has been happening in the city.

The Pupil and School Achievement

The view of the school administration is that if the parent is not supportive of the school, then the child will not be an achiever. in addition, among ghetto children so frequently, there is a problem of a sack of "concept of self';" The child in such instances has a negative view of himself, and no self regard. Parents who are supportive of the schools become involved and they, in turn, develop a feel ing of status in educational matters and transfer this to their children. The view is advanced that such children will become achievers in school,

The school administration is concerned with academic performance. They do see that social symbols and the emphasis on them are important Ir. academic performance. They also accept the view that cultural origins or the teaching of cultural origins and a self-conception of cultural origins is important to the child in motivating him to higher academic performance.

Some members of school administration believe that the period of attempts at integration are over, and they agree with various Negro organizations that school decentralization should be so organized so as to provide for a system of de facto segregation whereby black community control could be achieved. They express this as simply a matter of keeping and maintaining the present system of de facto segregation but making it work.They also see that their problem now

is to develop adequate leadership that can negotiate with other segments of the community and carry on a fruitful dialogue.

Urban institutional Support of Education

Detroit is one of the few cities in this study in which the major university

1 /A -168 -

located within its boundaries Is both concerned and involved in the urban problems of the city and its related educational questions.They have been making efforts to Improve the university's relations with the surrounding community and to work with the community on mutual problems,The university's school of education and its center for urban studies has arrangements to do research on urban educational problems and to encourage programs related to urban educational problems throughout the university.

The university has encouraged academic departments to Increase offerings in urban studies. It has fostered several critical studies of the university's role

In the city and has brought groups of graduate and undergraduate students together in interdisciplinary studies of urban educational problems and has held workshops to make university expertise Available to city officials and inner city groups.

Members of the faculty and graduate students in these programs are active members of these various inner city committees concerned with urban educational problems.

The university, through its division of urban extension, added a program of community extension centers in the inner city. The first center located in a predominantly black section in the east side of Detroit began operation in the spring of 1969. The university hopes to have such centers In other parts of

Detroit, but plans for a center on the west side have beta stalled by budget problems. The east side extension center is located In what was formally an activities building for a church across the street. It has a library, rooms for community meetings and classes, and a gymnasium that is used for athletics, cultural activities, and large meetings. The center Is staffed by community residents, professionals, and Wayne State students, most of whom come from the area where the center is located. The athletic programs have probably done more than anything else to get neighborhood youths involved in the center's programs and, in this way, they get to know the staff and eventually to talk to them about educational programs. The center offers 17 college-credit courses enrolling about 125 students.

Most of the students are between the ages of 13 and 30, but some are as old as 50. 175 -169 -

Because most of the students are poor, 90% receive some type of financial assistance. The center also provides tutorial and other supportive services. Classes are held at night to allow students to work during the day. All the courses are taught by regular faculty members who are carefully chosen. Most of the students could not get into the university under its regular adAssions standards.Students with 12 hours of B, or IS hours of C are automatically admitted to the university.

The result is that this type of center serves as a feeder between higher education and the high schools. The center hes an advisory committee of community residents helping to make sure that it meets the community's needs and to provide communi- cations with the community.

Administrative Decentralization, 1920

In the spring of 1970, the Detroit School Board in a move toward desegregation changed high school feeder school patterns to push the white students, bunched in schools near the city's outsk'ets, bad. toward the inner city. in Detroit, as in other major cities, in the North, the public schools have been turning black racially, the educational quality has fallen, and violence has occurred occasionally.

The Detroit school officials did, however, move some t'me ago in an effort to face racial issues.Two thirds of the 300,000 or 'o public school students here are non - white, but so are 2/5 of the teachers and 1/4 of the administrators, principals, assistant principals, and ccnse;ors.

The Michigan Legislature which had been studying the redistricting of the city's school system overruled the Detroit school officials' new boundary system and, at the same, time, voted a new bill decentralizing the c'.j,s school system.

In what was widely regarded as a white backlash, school board members who had voted for the boundary switches were recalled.

At this poht, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that the State could not stop a local integration plan. Detroit's

School Board, in turn, gave the Federal Court several plans from which to choose.

The Court in a ruling in December, 1970 rejected the approach of changing 176 -170 - boundaries and forced bussing and called instead for the voluntary approach with what was described as "magnet" schools. The statement was that "integration for

Integration's sake alone is self-defeating."In his plan,th.1 Judge calls for

the establishment of magnet high schools around the city, specializing In voca-

tional, science, arts, or business programs with students choosing the school and program they want. Such a voluntary program would be in contrast to forced bussing programs imposed by other Federal programs and is expected to become effective this fall.

The NAACP reaction to this plan was to state that " it is a free choice plan and was no doubt chosen because it would not result in any white children attending black schools:"The Court statement was as follows: " in a heterogeneous society such as ours, we are satisfied what (a quality education) cannot be attained without integration. Our objective then Is not integration in itself - which

if achieved in the wrong way canbe counter proziuctive - but the best education possible, with its sine qua known integration. integration for integration's sake alone is self-defeating, it does not advance the cause of integration, except in the short haul, nor does It necessarily Improve the quality of education."

The magnet plan is based on high quality schools drawing an integrated student body and providing a good education such as, for example, Detroit's Cass

Technical High School, or its equivalent, the Bronx High School of Science.

Under this plan, some of the high schools in each of the city's eight decentralized

regions would specialize in various programs.

Integration vs. "Community Control"

Tho question Is raised by the opponents of "community control" in Detroit - what about "integratIon"?The question Is important since the assumption is made that Negro pupil achievement is enhanced in an "integrated" school environment. However, in most urban settings, integration has proved elusive thus far, if rot Impossible, for both demographic-housing or political reasons.

At the same time, there is a growing shift of emphasis by minority group members 177 themselves away from Integration. Most of the proponents of these views view

Integration as desirable as a long range goal, however, they argue that it cannot be achieved as a short term objective.This argument advances the view that

integration can be attained only through success in an intermediate phase in which blacks control their schooling, and possibly all their community institutions.

These views accept the basic principle that control by Negroes overpredomlhalitly

black schools defers integration as a primary short term goal; atthe same time

it is denied vigorously that this implies acceptance of a"separate bit equal"

doctrine.

The philosophy that is advanced by the "community control"advocates assumes

that when Negroes achieve quality education by their owneffort, that Is, through

control over their institutions, they will gain a sense of"potency and racial

solidarity," This will provide the bnsis for their enteringinto a system of

integrated relationships with the white society on a foundationof parity and

equality, rather than dependency and inequality as at present.

Urban Schoei Reforms

Mario D. Fantini, in an unpublished paper on "CommunityControl and Quality

Education In Urban School Systems" summarizes the fundamentalreforms Implied In

the views of the zommunity control advocates:

A. Governance - a shift from professional dominance to a meaningful parental and community role In the education process.

B. Goals - an evolution to a humanistically-orientedcurriculum, modifying the skill-performance standard by which educational quality is primarily measured.

C. Personnel - opening the educational system to a farbroader base of talent than the conventionally prepared career educator, and training teachers through the reality of community needs and expression.

Fantini distinguishes these characteristics offundamental reform from the

characteristics of the traditional school system in thefolioNing manner:

178 -172- Traditional Reformed

Center of Professional monopoly The public, the community Control

Role cf parent To participate as active organizations To interpret the school to the agents in matters subcommunity, for public relations stantive to the educational process

Bureaucracy Centralized authority, limiting Decentralized decision- flexibility and initiative to making allowing for the professional at the indi- maximum local lay and vidual school level professional initiative and flexibility, with central authority con- centiatIng on technical assistance, long-range planning and system wide coordination.

Educational Emphasis on grade level Emphasis on both cognitive Objectives performance, basic skills, and affective development. cognitive achievement Humanistically oriented objectives, e.g., identity, connectedness, powerlessness

Test of professional Emphasis on credentials and Emphasis on performance efficiency and promotion systematized advancement with students and with through the system parent-community participants

Institutional Negative self fulfilling prophecy, Positive self fulfilling philosophy. student failure blamed on learner, prophecy - no student and his background failures only program failures - accountable to learner and community

Basic learning unit Classroom, credentialized The community, various teacher, school building agents as teachers, including other students and paraprofessionals'

Fantini concludes in an unpublished paper on "Participation, Decentralization,

Community Control and Quality Education", as follows:

''This participation made a great deal of sense, given the present reality. If the schools are still largely segregated and an inferior quality of education is continued, the natural approach seems to be for the community to take a hand in reshaping the institution toward quality education. Many of l'nnse favoring greater local control claim that those who are now talking about desegregation and integration are using this as an excuse for not allowing communities to pursue the option of community participation and Increased involvement In decision-making.

179 -173 -

The clients of our city schools are demanding a voice in updating. in so doing, they are rekindling certain philosophical and theoretical principles which takes us to the conceptual level of justification for community participation.

The first concept concerns public accountability and control of education. Incur society, public schools belong to the public. 't is the public that decides on policies and objectives for the school; it is the public that delegates to the professional the role of implementor and reserves for itself the role of accountant. The people are the trustees of the schools. Theyhove a right to ask why Johnny can't read. Moreover, if 85 per cent of the Johnnies can't read, as is the case in most of our so-called inner city schools, then the public has the right and resn.:.nsibility, as trustee, to supervise or monitor the needed changes -- changes aimed at reducing the discrepancy between policy and implemenOtion.

This process has in essence been in effect; black parents and community residents have been asking why so many black children are failing.Yhe usual ansveris that the children are "culturally deprivA" or "disadvantaged." in short, black child-on are failing because there Is something wrong with them. This verdict has increasingly been rejected, and in the absence of improvement In the performance of the children, the public -- in the fJrm of certain communities -- has begun to exercise its role as both accountant and trustee. Those in the forefront of this urban movemer.t poignantly ask: What would happen in Scarsdale or Grosse Pointe if 85 per cent of the children in these schools were academically retarded and if I per cent went to college? What would be the reaction of the parents and the community?

Many black parents who had patiently waited for improvement through such efforts as compensatory education and desegregation have begun to turn away from these efforts. Increasingly, communities are rendering the diagnosis that the problem is not with the learner; the problem is with the system, with the Institution. The cry now is: "We need a new system, one that is responsive to our kids and to us. It is up to us to build this new and relevant system."

Sincere schoolmen have been aware of the crises for some time but they were and still are victimized by the constraints of an outdated system. Often the professionals have become defensive, feeling that the public appears to expect the school and the schoolmen to solve all the ills of society. Many educators attempted to respond to the problem by programs of remediation on the one hand and token desegregation on the other. Both approaches were further stimulated by federal legislation but they have been less than successful. Some educators attribute the failures to the assumption which undergirds them -- namely, that the problem was with the learner and not with the institution. Certainly It is difficult, If not impossible, for those trying to keep the present system running to serve :Aso as the major agents of institutional change. Other legitimate parties are needed. And surely the parents and students constitute legitimate parties of the public school. Therefore, one could argue 180 -174 -

further that if the problem Is with the institution, then the movement generated by I.S. 201 offers us hope for real reform.

But even if school people were able, by themselves, to bring about radical institutional changes, they would thereby by denying opportunities for parents and students to learn and grow through the process of involvement and participation. For example, throu0 involvement, parents and students can learn more about the complexities of teaching and learning and relate this learning to their own roles of parents as teachers or students as teachers. Through involvement, parents and students can be more attuned to the role of the schooiman as an individual In a setting which places severe constraints on him; have a better view of program options; be more cog- nizant of the need for increased funds for education. Even more important, perhaps, is the realization that if the professional tries to go it alone this could lead to a professional, monopoly for the gradual utilization of processes not unlike those of totalitarian societies.

The second major principle emerging from the new partici- patory movement concerns the importance of process. Communities are no longer accepting the process of some:-.hing being done for or to them -- even if the product Is desira5le. Increasingly, the acceptance process is with or la the community, and this include; students as ',Jell. This principle 's intrinsically tied to the broader self-determination movemnt embraced by many blacks and other minority groupings.

The views of Fantini on black educational self determination have been resisted by the Detroit court and modified into an "integrated" plan without necessarily negating his "reform" recomendations.

A black school administrator in Detroit. in discussing the city's school probleks pointed out the following, which in a manner of speaking summarizes

Detroit's problems; "The question of relevance as it is supposed to be In the so-called middle class dominated schools. is in dispute. Yet at the same

time, the people who push that point, and I do, too, know that somewhere along the road, the child Is going to have to develop skills which will allow him to Interact with the mainstream of society. He Is going to have to develop the kind of language that permits him to do that. There Is the view where the initial attempt will be to make this institution "relevant" ... and not worry about d:v.!lopment of skills until you have accomplished that objective.

After that you can get them to transfer -- you can motivate :hem to develop these skills. Whether this can be successful is to be seen ..." 181 -175-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF DETROIT

I. Racial Composition and Population Size

Size of metropolitan area 4.250.000 population 1968

Size of the city of Detroit 1.570.000 Populatton 1.968

Percent Negro in Metropolitan area (non-white)

Percent Negro In Detroit 1950 16.4% ( non-white) 1965 30.2.%

1970 (est) 434Q

1980 (est)

Negro as Percent of Non-white 93.27,

Ii. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 95% Negro (Subcommunity data only

1965 0

1950 0

Proportion of Negro population In tracts with 7096 Negro (70-92%) (subcommunity data only)

1965 35.1 x

1950

Commvits: Most demographic data for Detroit is collected by

subcommunity rather than census tract. There are 49 subcommonities,

each containing a cluster of census tracts.See attached map showing

subcommunity boundaries.

182 NORTHLAWN SOD 111110010 COuT EN 1:C s .1....1.C A PALMER 10C STATIC FAIR VC PERSHING C Nev400,90 MT. OLIVFT SO 111.1113ANK IC LOOLSY CLEVELAND 9S FOREST LAWN SC CONNEe eA 1.1014TMOOR 12A III WYOMING LAWTON 3C 10001 CHANCRES 71 1 SCI4001.CRAFT IIA la 6 LIVERNOIS 36 6 CENTER 4A OAKLAND HARPER SA MACK 60 PARKOA WARRENDALE 131 MACKENZIE 14A a ROGLIVARD 3A s. IWARREN 15C T1K/MAN 15A CADILLAC SPRINGWILLS 0 FORD 156 MICHIGAN VDRT IA DAV CREEK L6C VIRMC/11 166 CIT I of DETROIT B Y DELRAY 16A SUBCOMMUNITY 1960 A upgANREsEARcriLABORATGRyWAYNE STATE UNIvERStry scLe , A.& uh; TED vI MUROPOLITAft IDURCST Cemmun,TY A SERVICES -176-

Most Heavily Negro Social Planning, Areas

District Percent Negri Density* Median Family % Below (Subcommunity) (non-white) Income Poverty Level ($3000)

10D 89.6 33.7 $6030 19

I5A 91.3 57.6 5240 28.2

3C 89.7 69.0 6460 18.2

1B 87.8 118.1 2800 53.2

3B 78.0 59.1 6450. 17.4

4A 71.9 72.6 5480 27.6

10B 72.7 51.6 6450 17.5

15C 71.2 49.7 5780 23.7

16o 81.4 43.6 7240 9.9

lA 89.5 68.0 5920 23.9

4(3 92.2 71.0 4030 35.4

6c 81.4 61.4 5570 21.5

*Density reported is persons per residential acre.

Additional Facts concerning the High Negro Density Areas: (See attached table for this information)

Median Family Income in year

Size of area

Population

Number of elementary schools in area

Delinquency rate

Population Density

School enrollment

184 camas sub- it Po ulatior 1965 ADDITIONAL FACTS CONCERNING THE Housing notin sound1960 schoolsnumber ofin area enrollmentHIGH NEGRO schoolDENSITY AREAS1969 Delinquency 1960rate employment Un- 15A10D 1B3C 43,48026,03738,72638,176 43.415.2 8.2 5. 7 961 3,6417,5687,958 438 2815 9 9.81.72.93,9 10B15C 48,32914,38621,13039271 , 11.410.7 6.3 278 2,1852,3987,1206,563 11142216 1.42.72.1 .7 16D6c 3A 29,65028,80346,68720,368 11.417.432.012.4 856 16:4;4,5773,516 162019 5 1.13.12.82.7 TotalMeanNumber ofschools. schools in area and school enrollment includes elementary and junior high 395,343 16.4 68 56,849 13.8 2.9 15C15A10810D CENSUS TRACTS CONTAINED IN EACH SUBCO11JNITY 161,170,305A, 159, 171, 3058 160, 172, 157, 173 158 1B3A3B3C 212,178,211,546,179,1761, 181202,213, 547,180, 176B, 201,251, 544,154, 176C, 111,168, 545,155, 176D, 18,169112;43 , 166, 167,174,19? 175,21 177, 165, 182, 164 I 44AAn 8 186,22,535,74_553, 151, 537,183, 7g.554, 152,K7A_536,184, 5;5, 153,C7R538,191 556, 187, 552527 , ,528542, 551, 533, 557,188, 189, 190, 558,532, 185, 534,559 -177-

Unemployment

Public Welfare 1961wasNeroNofv

Income Level

Out of school youth Information not available

Ill. Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard see Table

Percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000

24.6%

Unemployment rates in the City :If Detroit:

Date Average Negro White (non-what)

1968 5.1% 7.3X 3.9%

1967 5.2 9.8 2.9

Comments: Unemployment figures prior to 967 were not kept by race.

186 -178-

A PROFILE OF THE DETROIT SCHOOL SYSTEM

1. Size of the System

Total number of schools 293 dateOct.. 1969

No. of elementary schools 223 date Oct.. 1961 (includes 14 K-9)

No. of Junior schools 38 date Oct., 1962

No. of Senior High Schools 24 date Oct., 1969

Special schools

II. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff and Students

A. Staff No. Negro 4,879 39.6

Negroes in white schools (10 all white schools) 19 .1+

Negroes in Negro schools (23 all Negro schools) 415 8.5

In elementary schools 2,925 59.9

In Senior High schools 753 15.6

Certified personnel (The statistical breakdown for (Detroit is Instructional vs. Classroom teachers (non-Instructional staff

Ratio pupils/teachers (elem.) 27:1

(sec.) 25:1

Mean years experience (teachers) 10.5

% first year teachers 16,3

% non-degree not available

% B.A. (or less) 67.5

% H.A. 27.3

% M.A. plus

Note: All figures glven for teachers should read instructional staff.

187 -179-

Salary - minimum (Bach) $7616. (Salary is for 39 weeks) maximum (Bach) $12.436.

B. Students

Negro enrollment in Publicschools:

Year ND.

1961 130,765 45.8 1963 150,565 51.3 1964 155,852 53.0 1965 161,487 54.8 1965 168,299 56.7 1957 171,707 58.2 1968 175,474 59.4 1969 180,630 61.5

Humber of Negroes in Segregated Elementary Schools: (including junior high schools)

1964 3,576 2.3 1965 5,912 3.6 1968 15,031 8.6 1969 14,400 11.0

Comments: Under Negro enrollment the figure is for public schools which

includes Junior High and High School.Figures for segregated schools include elementary and junior high. Segregated schools has been interpreted as schools which are all Negro.

188 -18u-

Student Performance

Test Score (date: Oct., 1968) Schools 95-100% White (Standardized) Negro

Iowa Test oF Basic Skills

Grade 2 - not administered MOP

Grade 4 3.1 3.9

Grade 6 4.8 5.7

Grade 8 6.0* 8.5*

*These scores based on only two schools.

Stanford Reading Achlevemont

End of 3rd Year Standardized reading tests are not regularly administered. No End of 6th Year scores were available.

C. School Board

Method of Selection: There are 7 members of the school board elected for

a 4-year term in a non-partisan, at-large election.

Number cf Negroes on School Board:Three. A. Perdue, Rev. D. Stewart, Dr.

R. Robinson.

Members of the Detroit Board of Education:

J. Hathaway P. Gryilis A. Zwerdling P. McDonald A. Perdue Dr. R. Robinson D. Stewart

189 -181-

BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR DETROIT

Achievement Test Scores of Pu2JIs in Detroit Public Schools, Department of Research and Development, Detroit Public Schools, July, 1969.

Racial-Ethnic Distribution of Students and Employees In Detroit Public Schools, Department of Integroup Relations, Detroit Public Schools, October, 1969. .October 1968. October 1967.

Neighborhood Youth Information, Detroit Commission on Children and Youth, Winter 1965.

A Profile of Southeastern Michigan, Detroit Region Transportation and Land Use Study, August, 1968.

Population and Oc.cuoied Dwelling Units In Detroit Region, South East Michigan Council of Governments, May 1969.

The Non-White Population of Metropolitan otrolt, United Community Services, Research Department, 1955.

A Profile of the Detroit Negro 1959-1964, Detroit Urban League, Research Department, June 1965.

Residential Densities Table by 1960 Census Tract. City of Detroit, '. City Plan Commission, Research Division, April, 1966.

Information was also obtained from the following sources:

Department of Statistical Reporting, Detroit Board of Education

Department of Research and Statistics, Michigan Employment and Securities Commission.

City Plan Commission

Transportation and Land Use Study (TALUS)

ECHO Study, DeparWent of Health

190 CHAPTER 8

CHICAGO: CONTROLLED ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION

IN AN URBAN SCHOOL SYSTEM

Demographic and Educational Characteristics

The city of Chicago with its population of 3,351,500 has, as of 1970, about one-third of its population or 32% Negro. It is expected that by 1980 this percentage will grow to 41%. At the same time, the facial distribution of population hos been underyoing some geographic shifting. City tracts which were 95% Negro lost population between 1950 and 1965, while tracts which were less dense (70%

Negro) gained Negro population in the same period.

Many of the areas with a high percentage of Negro residents have high percentages on a poverty level. Of the 15 Social Planning Areas of the city in 1966, there is data available for seven. These seven areas report the percentage below poverty level as ranging from 20 to 42%. Three of these areas has 40% or more of their population below the poverty level. Eight of the fifteen areas had a median family Income ranging from $5000. to $6000, One area had a median family

Income of less than $4000. The percentage of families in Negro areas with incomes below $3000. was 30% (1966). In 1968 the white unemployment rate was about A.

In a study by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that it regards as fairly representative for all poor Negro areas based on a sample of 117,000, it found an unemployment rat. of about 9 per cent.

The city school system had, in 1969, a total of 536 schools, of which 470 were elementary and 57 senior high schools. These schools contain over 570,000 pupils. The elementary school population totaled nearly 430,000 and there were more than 140,000 in the secondary schools. In addition, during the summer of

1966 over 120,000 were enrolled In various educational programs. About 243,000

(56%) of these students come from the highly dense Negro areas. Ninety per cent of these Negro students are In segregated elementary schools.The total

Negro teaching staff, inciLding assistant principals, numbers7844 or 34%.

191 -183 -

The administrative staff has 633 Negroes, Or 25 per cent. One hundred per cent of the staff have B.A.'s while 25% of these have their M.A.'s.

The total budget approved for the calendar year 1967 was approximately

$418 million. There are about 515 schools and 99 branches. Of these, there are

57 high schools with 32 branches and 458 elementary schools with 67 branches.

In the past 5 years, nearly 2,000 classrooms have been added as a result of opening 33 new school buildings, modifying existing facilities and rehabilitating

14 buildings. There are now over 17,000 classrooms available. The school system employs about 34,000 people of which number teachers, principals, supervisors, and superintendents are approximately 23,500.

A basic educational problem Chicago has in common with other urban areas is revealed by the test scores.City-wide, 52 per cent of the entering pupils scored as "ready fcr school" in contrast to 69 per cent of the norm group.The first test of school learning ability, the Kuhlmann-Anderson Intelligence Test, is administered in the middle of the same year. The city-wide group median was at the 54th percentile.

In the tests administered to pre-fourth grade, sixth grade and eighth grade pupils, the following were the city-wide median percentile ranks for the grade level indicated:

Grade SLA Reading Arithmetic Computation

Pre-4 37 34 45

6 38 29 35

8 38 38 28

The achievement tests used in all instances are different levels of the

Metropolitan Achievement Tests.The Kuhlmann-Anderson Intelligence Test is used in the pre-fourth grade testing and the California Test of Mental Maturity,

Short Form is used in sixth and eighth grades.

The school system's planning department has estimated that student enrollment will increase by about 35,000 to 605,000 by 1971.The School Board has

192 -184 - been desirous of reducing the size of individual -lasses, but at the same time, it must provide a program to increase facilities and increase the teaching staff and to enlarge its funds. The increase in student enrollment will, however, bring other demands on the system's educational and administrative structure.

The shifting population in the various sections of the city create a need to revise attendance units and balance the educational workload. The result is, that as these changes occur, educational programs need to be modified to express the variety of needs of the local student population.The result is that there is a continuing necessity to explore new educational concepts such as educational parks and comprehensive high schools; a demand and a necessity that is cumbersome in as huge a centralized bureaucracy as that of the Chicago educational system.

School System Oraaniz3tional Changes

The organization survey of 1967 resulted in adopting a plan for the decentralization of the Chicago school system. This decentralization plan carried with it the concept of moving a great deal of responsibility to the "field", and to the lowest organizational levels considered practical.

The plan gave the Board the responsibility for setting policy, for examining major issues facing the school system, and for considering recommendations made by the general superintendent. It delegated responsibility for administration and operations to the general superintendent and through him to the school system personnel. The Board's primary function was to be that of review and approval of plans and policies for the school system.

The general superintendent's role was defined as one of being responsible for the educational program, developing facility plans to fit the educational requirements and establishing financial programs to support the educational and facility programs. He also was given the responsibility of assessing how effectively programs and facilities were meeting the objectives of the system and introduce changes that were appropriate.The Superintendent also was made responsible for the effectiveness of the school system's employees, and for

193 -185 - school system's relationships with citizen groups and agencies of the city, state and federal government.

The organization survey followed up the definitions of the general superintendent's functions by establishing a system of staff support that he would require. The staff support given him under this framework consisted of a planning arm, an evaluative branch, direct suppc.-t in the community and human rektions areas on system wide matters, and general administrative assistance. In essence, this staff support provides a core of the central bureaucracy at the city's school system headquarters. These functions and the staff required to carry them out deal with developing integrated plans for educational programs, facilities, finances, an operations analysis group to evaluate the effectiveness of educational and administrative programs, e community relations group, a human relations department, a deputy superintendent and administrative assistants.

The rationale for the central office was to be that functions which are system wide in nature and which are highly specialized or, which for cost reasons, need to be handled centrally would make 'p the central office organization.

The concept used was that these are functions which can be performed most effectively at this level without impairing, it was thought, the administrative authority and prerogatives of the new decentralized field r.rganization.

Decentralized Administrative Areas

As a result of the organization survey, a plan was adopted for dividing the city into three major areas, each headed by an associate superintendent. The plan did not rule out the possibility of expanding the number of areas to four or five if this was found to advance the educational administ:ative effectiveness of the school system. The principle on which the subdivisions were made was a geographic one which would establish a balanced work load for each of the areas.

The two main factors in balancing the load that were used were (1) size, measured in terms of number of students in schools and (2) socio-economic characteristics.

The associate superintendent in charge of each area in effect became the 194 -18b- general superintendent of a sizeable school operation. He was given direct line of communication to the deputy superintendent of schools and his field office was given the authority to administer the educational program of the system in his area. He was also given an adequate organization to carry out the program for the area. His responsibilities involved the preparation and administration of his area budget and the assignment and transfer of personnel within existing guidelines. However, central headquarters retained the function of recruiting personnel for the entire system.

The organization and composition of the area organization included the present central office staff groups which operate in the field and all their functions. The area associate superintendent had assigned to him the district superintendents for his area who were to seve as "assistant area associate superintendents" with responsibility for a group of elementary and secondary schools.Area staff personnel were to be distributed among the districts, but they would not exercise line authority over the school principals. Line authority responsibility would be part of the role of the area associate superintendent and district superintendents. Area staff personnel would receive functional guidance from their counterparts on the central office staffs. Services that are required in the schools, the plan indicated, would be provided by personnel on the staff of the area associate superintendent. These personnel work throughout the area or in specific districts depending on the need.

The introduction and the implementation of this system of administrative decentralization has brought about a first step as the school system indicated, towards a decentralized system.However, it remains a long way from 4 system of decentralization which would allow greater contact, communication and participation by local communities. The huge school system and its centralized bureaucracy remain very much in evidence.The result in dissatisfaction on the part of those who were demanding decentralization, un the one hand, and dissatisfaction on the part of many members of the school system in making 195 -107-

this cumbersome system operate effectively.Area associate superintendents are often accused of being only low level area managers who must turn for all important

decisions to central headquarters.The retention of many functions at central headquarters enhances this view of the new system on the part of many community

leaders, especially the activists and the militants.This latter group will, however, never be satisfied until the school system is broken down to a multitude of small autonomous school districts. The schal board resists moving in this

direction and the deaands of the militants are not reinforced ay any concrete

evidence that a multitude of autonomous small school districts would solve the problems of education in Chicago.Nor do these advocates have a plan which would make such a completely decentralized system operate in terms of the vast fiscal and tax problems, let alone the administrative and educational problems.

Central school headquarters is more interested in community involvement than

in community control.They see their problems as making the system work more

effectively. They find that some of the principals and lower level superintendents are using the facilities and resource's that they have effectively. Within the

present framework, they state, the community can look at the school and state

their criticisms and priorities.As far as textbooks are concerned, principals

can state what are needed, but there are limits within the framework of professional

suggestiois. The principal can bring in experts to help them with educational

review and research, and he can go to the Board of Education for assistance.

Central headquarters sees community involvement as desirable in the selection of

principals.

Decentralized Area A. South Side

Area A is one of the three decentralized areas of the city. It has more

blacks than any other area, about 75-80X of its population. It has nine districts,

some of which are 95-100% black. Each district within it has a district super-

intendent with a school system from K through 12.Area A has its own budg4t,

personnel department, and system of facilities. 196 -183 -

The area superintendent decides on all personnel from assistant principals

and up. The Department of Personnel at central headquarters decides on all

teaching appointments. It also decides on the city wide teacher/pupil ratio

of 311 pupils per teacher, however, the area superintendent can make some exceptions.

The area superintendent also appoints substitutes from within his own personnel

list.

The area superintendent is assisted by five directors who have many of the

duties of central headquarters staff people.He has a fiscal and budget officer, and he conducts relations with parent groups.Area A has within it 190 schools

including 16 high schools. These have 19,000 pupils and 6800 teachers. Forty per cent of the teachers are black. The area superintendent has available to him

curriculum services and consultants in the areas of home economics, art and music, physical educati -n, modern math, and industrial arts studies. These consultants

teach the teachers techniques and ideas. Their job is to stay on top of developments in these fields.

A real effcrt is bellg mode to develop independence and decision-making abilities on the part of principals. They are free to use curriculum guides as

they wish. The principal is the teaching leader and a good principal can operate with a great deal of freedom. The principal does have limitations on him with

respect to the financial budget.

The Woodlawn District

Four pastors In the community were deeply concerned about the conditions of Woodlawn In the late fifties. They, with the help of liberal elements in the area, began the Woollawn organization. These elements drew up a statement which

found that " (1)the Wvodlawn community as a whole was not represented by any one organization; (2) that blight, overcrowding of residential buildings,

transiency, crime and social disorganization was dangerously on the increase;

(3)that this community deterioration began slowly during the Depression of the

Thirties and was sharply accelerated by the housing shortage during World 1,:arji

197 -189 - and was intensified by post war inflation coupled with rent control; and (4)

that racial change in the community began around 1949-50 and within 6 years the population became some 90% non-white."

The new organization received assistance to the extent of $50,000. from the

Catholic Church. The Schwartzhaupt Foundation contributed $69,000. and $21,000. came from the First Presbyterian Church of Chicago.The Industrial Areas Found- ation served as a means of encouraging the contribution of funds to the Woodlawn organization. The Woodlawn organization, in addition to attacking unfair business practices and conducting rent strikes, was very much concerned with community school problems. They saw the importance of the school to them as making the community a desirable place to live in, by providing good education in local schools.

The first concern was that schools in the ghetto are an abysmal failure.

They were very much concerned with the views of school people that the slum child was uneducable and that they were throwing their failures on the back of the parents. They disagreed strongly that since the children come from underprivileged homes where there are no books, that this was the fundamental problem of schooling.

They placed these views within a framework that the whole educational system was designed to meet the needs of the white middle class child who comes out of an environment where there are books and educated parents, and where even the

language spoken is significantly different from that of the slum child.They adopted the view that the educational system must devise new approaches to education just as education devised new approaches to teaching the hard of hearing and the blind.

They advanced the view that the curriculum was foreign to the ghetto child.

The middle class first readers, they stated, present statements such as "See

the cow. See the beautiful grass," and that such statements were not oriented

toward the reality of the ghetto child. Such a child finds it very hard to

relate to Dick and Jane in a small town with beautiful lawns, tricycles, and 198 -190 -

the friendly corner policeman.They saw the "Dick and Jane" representing the white society as a threat to the survival of black children.They consider the new readers as only slightly better. These readers feature urban life and black as well as white characters, but they state that they still fail to reach ghetto children. They view the compensatory program such as Upward Bound and Headstart as failures in that they are not changing the educational system itself. They claim that as soon as the child is out of that temporary phase of compensatory education and back in th,: system, he loses within a year or two, whatever he had

learned. They demanded that meaningful experimentation must go on in the school system and that this experimentation can involve the whole community. They also demanded that the organized community should have some voice in the choosing of a principal in that school. They presented the view that a man may be well qualified academically and administratively to run a middle class white school, however, they claim that his psychological point of view toward black children and the black community might make him unqualified in the ghetto.

The Woodiawn Urban Education Development Protect

The Woodlawn organization, the Chicago public schools and the University of

Chicago decided to establish a cooperative educational venture. In order to carry out their goals, they developed a project proposal to the U.S. Office of Education.

After lengthy negotiations, they received a grant of $70,000. from the U.S. Office of Education. The objectives for this project were as follows: "The Woodiawn organization is primarily Interested in building leadership for the redevelopment of the community and in changing the basic educational program and the allocation of resources so that the educational system will be geared to the needs of the youth and the community."The staff was concerned with providing an assessment of

the problems including the perceptions and opinions of persons in the schools, in

the neighborhood and on the university campus. This was done by interviews with children, parents, teachers and school staff members in addition to principals of

three elementary schools, one upper grade center and one high school.The assess- 199 -191- ment uncovered many programs which they considered promising. The problems they found and learned, however, were overwhelming and the means for dealing with them insufficient. They found that there was a great need for more qualified adults to work with the children. They learned that the teachers needed more help in the classrooms from specialists than they were getting.They found that administrative decisions were often made without consulting the people in the schools whom the decisions would affect. They found also that conditions in the home and the community were detrimental to school learning. The presence of gangs in the community was found to be a major detriment to learning. They found some parents apathetic and hostile toward the schools. These parents criticized principals and teachers for lack of interest in the ghetto child and in the parent, and indicated that their value orientations were much different than that of the teachers. They found poor discipline in the classroom and teachers reported that the children often came to them inadequately prepared for reading, speaking and listening, making it impossible for them to perform at the required grade level. The City

Board of Education accepted the recommendations of the Project Staff to retain a tripartite collaborative administrative structure for the Woodlawn Community

Board and the staff to be free to work out a detailed proposal for the program in the experimental schools. A formula was developed whereby the Woodlawn School

District would, in essence, be an autonomous district governed by the Woodlawn eommunity Board, and together they developed a proposal for an experimental school district, for Woodlawn and Tttle III funding.

The Woodlawn Community Board was established with 21 members, four of them from the University of Chicago, ten from the community and seven from the Board of Education. The Board came into existence on July I, 1968 in the administrative decentralized system which the Board established for the city. Under this system, recommendations come up from the staff members in various areas and also from the Woodlawn Community Board, and these recommendations go to the central Board of Education and if and when approved, (and all so far have been approved) then

200 -192 - they are submitted to the school staff and administrative personnel for implementation.

Thus far the Woodlawn Community Board has recommended that black architects be used and that black union people be used in construction of facilities, and this has been approved.The Board has also recommended that black literature be introduced into a number of courses and that a number of course recommendations that were wade by the staff be approved; this was subsequently approved by the central Board of Education. The Woodlawn Board also asked for changes in curriculum, which were subsequently approved. Thus far the staff Is developing some new literature for these recommended courses.

The experimental school project director believes that It is extremely impDrtant that local people be involved in given issues end that they be free to make their own decisions.The project director also believes that these people should be free to make their own mistakes and to introduce the improvements that they wish. The project director claims that if this were always the case, that community people would make few mistakes, and certainly fewer mistakes than have been made in the past by others and their achievement of success will inevitably be high.

The Project Director, however, advances the view that the fundamental controls of decision-making for the school system and in particular for the

Woodlawn area, rests in the hands of the real estate people who control the city's

Board of Education. Her view Is that these individuals who own and represent the owners of property in the city make fundamental decisions for the populous people of the city. As long as this continues the Woodlawn School Project will not have the autonomy that it needs and desires and therefore will not be able to accomplish or achieve its goals.

The Woodlawn Project began with a director of research under the Project

Director to develop an assessment over the three year life of the project. At the end of two years when the Project Director was asked about the achies,ements

201 -193 - of the project, her response was that it as difficult to indicate at that point in time, the results of the experiment; but that at the end of three years, results would be reported.However, at the same time, she did report that there were many difficulties but was hopeful about the results. In the course of this study, it was learned the research director was no longer on the project or carrying out the assessment. This was learned accidentally from the University of Chicago faculty members who are members of the tripartite Woodlawn organization. It therefore means that no assessment report can be expected from the Woodlawn project at the end of its three years of experimental existence.

Chicago has taken small steps towards Qecentralization, it however, remains a large cumbersome bureaucratic system. It is even taking steps towards experimenting with autonomous sub-districts as in the case of the Woodiawn project. The

Woodlawn Project, however, is proving not to be a helpful venture in the direction of the concepts about school decentralization. The Project's problems, difficulties and failures have led to verbose verbalizations about barriers existing in some large fundamental social system of a tenuous ideological character.The failure to realize the factors stressed in the Coleman Report and in the socio- logical and social psychological literature about the fundamental importance of the family, of the community and of pupil peers has led the Woodlawn Project leaders into vast expectations as to what could be accomplished by changes in school personnel and changes in classroom materials and school and community leaders.

These failures have not led to the recognition of the importance cf family, community and school but rather to the erection of new theologies about the barriers to educational achievement of their children. The centralized bureaucracy of both the school system and the professionals in it continue to dominate the school system and while various types of experiments and small changes occur, and will continue to occur, the hop3d for changes in improving the overall school system continue to lag.

202 -194-

A PROFILE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

I. Racial Composition and Population Size

Size of metropolitan area Cook Country: 5,449,000: Chicago SMSA:

6,845,000 (Agri1, p968)

Size of the city of Chicago 3,351,500 (January 16, 1270)

Percent of Negro in Metropolitan Area 16.7%

Percent Negro in Chicago 1950 13.6'4

1965 26.7%

1970 (est) 31.9%

1980 (est) 41.0%

Negro as Percent of Non-white 97.0%

II. Racial Distribution

Proportion of Negro population in tractslwith 95% Negro2

1965 32.1%

1950 50.0%

Proportion of Negro population in tracts with 70% Negro3

1965

1950 5.5%

Comments:

1These data were compiled on the basis of Chicago communityareas

each of which encompasses several census trac'3; these areas are quite

homogeneous in racial composition.

295% - 100% Negro

370% - 95% Negro

203 -I95- Most Heavily Negro Planning Areas (April 1966) (greater than 70% Negro) Median Family % Below District Percent Negro Density Income Poverty Level2

East Garfield Park 86.8% 32,563/sqm $5260 not available

West Garfield Park/ 66.1 33,204/sqm 5670 not available

North Lawndale 94.3 34,677/sqm 5670 31%

Douglas 88.7 30,279/sqm 5752 42%

Douglas B3 96.1

Oakland 97.8 44,964/sqm 4050 27%

Fuller Park 97.2 I4,568/sqm 5180 not available

Grand Boulevard 99.0 47,399/sgm 5130 20% 4 Kenwood 82.5 36,377/sqm 8240/6440 26.1%

Washington Park 98.9 28,378/sqm 5990 not available

Woodlawn 97.7 36,330/sqm 5508 41%

Chatham`' 87.6 15,356/sqm 8420 not available

Riverdale 86.4 3,228/sqm 3810 40%

Englewood 82.3 29,840/sqm 6080 not available

Greater Grand Crossing5 96.4 17,091/sqm 7130 not available

/This area was included because migration patterns indicate that thisarea now has a Negro population substantially greater than 70%; an area (Near South Side) has been excluded which is now believed to be below 70% though it was above that figure in April, 1966.

2These are percentage estimates from a sample of residents in public housing in the respective community areas taken from the 1968 proposal of the Chicago Model Cities Planning Commission. These are the only data available on families below poverty level (since the 1960 census) and are not too reliable.

3The Douglas area was subdivided into a lake shore strip and an inland strip. The lake shore strip is an integrated area of middle income level families living in high-rise apartments. The inland area is segregated Negro. Douglas B represents the inland area. Douglas is the entire area, the median figure weighted for population. Douglas B families have a median income of $4600 per year. The source did not give a geographic base for his subdivision, which Is not a standard one.

4The two figures for median income for a lake and inland strip with there- marks above generally applying. No geographic or population base is given for subdiyision. Middle Income level Negro areas, % below poverty level probably not far from city average. 204 -196 -

Additional Facts concerning the High Negro Density_ Areas:

Median Family income in year $5885 (1966)

Size of area 29,028 square miles (1960)

Population 765,423 (1966)

Number of elementary schools in area 1991

Delinquency rate only available in aggregated form by six are districts

with heavy concentration of white population

Population Density 26,368/sum Inc, Riverdale; 29,644 exc. Riverdale

School Enrollment 294,1811

Unemployment 8.6% (6/68-6/69

Public Welfare Active Caseload - pejment cases,_78 046

Estimated Number of Persons Receiving Aid - 219,209

Income Level $5885 (1966)

Out of School Youth not available

111. Poverty Levels

Percentage of housing in Negro areas substandard not available

Percentage of families In Negro ar%a with incomes below $3000

29.8% (1965) 1

Unemployment rates In the City of ChIcago

Date Average Negro White

1968 ('69 not 3.8% 7.14 2.7% yet available)

Comments;

1Ichool districts are not congruent with community areas. These figures are for schools with greater than 707 Negro enrollment.

2This figure is from a study by the Bureau or Labor Statistics ina concentrated employment program area in the Chicago commun:ty areas of East and West Gardleid, North Lgwndale and parts of the near west side (sample = 117,000). It should be a fairly representative figure for all poor Negro areas listed.

3For all Negro families; data not available by community area.

205 A PROFILE OF THE CHICAGO SCHOOL SYSTEM

I. Size of the System

Total number of schools _536 inc. special schools date Seotember,_j91.9

No. of elementary schools 470 date Ilamzi1969Seteri

No. of Junior schools none date

No. of Senior High Schools 57 date September, 1969

II. Racial Composition and Distribution of Staff and Students

A. Staff (September, 1969)

Negro Administrative Staff 633 25.1 Teachers incl asst. princ. 7844 34.0 White 52:911.% Negro 99.7.1091 Negroes in white schools) ) 448 (5.7%) 549 (7.9%) 6839 (87.373 Negroes in Negro schools)

In elementary schools 5962 36.9

In Senior High schools 1883 27.3

Certified personnel 16,311 67.61 (includes specially funded positions -- averages 1300 per month)

Classroom teachers 23,079 (exc. specially funded pos.)

Ratio pupils/teachers (elem.)2 26.9: 1

(sec.) 2 21.1: I

Meen years experience (teachers) 5 years3

% first year teachers

% non-degree none3

% B.A. 100%3

% M.A. 25% 3

1among all teachers; data on certified personnel are not available by race. -These figures are deceptively low. Counselors and assistant principals who do not teach are nevertheless counted as teachers. An independent oral communication gave the ratios as follows: elem: 34.5:1; sec: 23.9:1. 3by oral communication. The Board of Educ. refused to allow examination of its records. 206 -198-

Salary - minimum (Bach) S8000 + ten days Raid vacation

maximum (Bach) $12,750 + ten days paid vacation

B. Students

Negro enrollment in elementary schools:

Year No. % of total city enrollment

September 26, 1969 242,763 55.9

Number of Negroes In Segregated Elementary Schools: 90-100% Negro

Year No. % of Negro elementary enrollment

September 26, 1969 2'7,320 89.6

Comments:

207 -199-

Student Performance

Test Score (date: Schools 95-100X White fStandardizedi_ Negro

Grade 2

Grade 4

Grade 6

Grade 8 See: "Report of the 1968-69 City-Wide Testing Program", Chicago Fublic Stanford Reading Achievement Schools, Board of Education, City of Chicago, 1969. End of 3rd Year

End of 6th Year

C. School Board

Method of selection:Members are appointed by the mayor of the city of Chicago.

The mayor selects from nominations made by the City Commission on School

Board Nominations. However this commission has no legal status and the

mayor can by-pass its recommendations.

Number of Negroes on School Board: 3(out of a total of 11).

Members of the Chicago Board of ?Education

Mrs. David Certa

Alvin J. Boutte

Warren H. Bacon

Thomas J. Murrary

Frank M. Whiston

Bernard S. Friedman

Mrs. W. Lydon Wild

Mrs. Carey B. Preston

John D. Carey

Mrs. Louis A. Malls

Jack Witkowsky

208 -200-

Bibliography on Chicago

Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Official Report of the Proceedings of the Board, 1968-69.

, Report of the 1963-69 City-Wide Testing Pro- gram, December, 1969. Bureau of Research, Development and Special Projects, Directory of the Chicago Public Schools 1969, Board of Education of City of Chicago.

, Facts and Figures 1968-69, Board of Education of the City of Chicago.

, Racial Headcount of staff (unpublished).

Racial Headcou]it of Students (unpublished).

Chicago Police Department, Chicago Police Annual Report 1968 19G9, Chicago Police Department.

Cook County Department of Public Aid, Public Assistance Division, Analysis of Grants 1969 tunpublished).

de Viso, Pierre, Chicago's Widening color Gap 1967, Interuniversity Social Research Comattee,

Hospital Planning Council for Metropolitan Chicago, Population Estimates for Municipalities and CouLties in the Chicago Consolidated Area: 1965 and 1966. December, 1966, Chicago Association of Commerce and fOilary (unpublished).

Hospital Planning Council for Metropolitan Chicago, Population Estimates for Municipalities and Counties in the Chicago Consolidated Area: 1967 and 1968. July, 1968, Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry (unpublished).

Hospital Planning Council for Metropolitan Chic.),go, Population Estimates for Municipalities and Counties in the Chicago Consolidated Area: 1969January, 1979, Chicano Association of Commerce and Industry (uiipublisheu).

Kitacaua, Evelyn and Hauser, Phillip, ed., Local Community Fact Book for Chicago Metronolitan Area, 19507 Community Renw:al Program Study, Chicago. Hitagawa, Evelyn and Taeuber, Karl, ed., Local CommunitFact Book for Chicago Metropolitan Area, I GO. 1 3, C cago Community Inventory, University of Chicago, Chicago.

)

209 -201-

Model Cities Planning Commission, Proposal for Chicago Model Cities Program (unpublished),

U.S. Department of Labor, Employment .end Earnings and Monthly Report on the Labor ForceMarch, 1969 (vol. 15 No. p), Bureau of Labor Statistics (U.S. Government Printing Office). Washington.

, Employment and Earnings and Monthly Report on the Labor Force January, 197b (vol. 16 No. 7), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

, Employment Situation in Poverty Areas ofSix Cities October, 1561, Nieau of Labor Statistics, Waglington (unpublished).

210 CHAPTER 9

RESEARCH ON DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL

The concern about decentralization and community control in all of the eight cities discussed in this report arises out of the fundamental interest in bringing about more effective education and improvements in the public school system, in These cities and especially in their central urban ghetto areas. Under- lying these concerns is the interest in bringing about equalization of educational opportunities for all of the pupils in ail of these cities. It is part of the

American dream of equality. The school system is seen as the major social system for bringing about this equality. The most recent immigrant to the city, the

American Negro, has come to view the city school system as the most efficacious means for realizing equality not only of education, but eiso of realizing educational quality as a means to economic equality. Decentralization and community control have been proposed as the most recent set of answers to re- vitalizing, renewing, and spurring the public educational system on to new levels of achievement.

Will decentralization and community control change teachers, change teaching, change learning on the part of pupils and bring about the dreamt of quality education for urban children to equal the assumed quality education of suburban children? Will decentralization and community control change the attitudes toward education on the part of parents, children, teachers, and school administrators? Will decentralization and community control alter the academic performance of pupils and the expectations about pupil performance?

Will decentralization and community control alter the interest, concern and participation of pdientc in school affairs and their children's school performance? Will decentralization and community control have an impact on community confusion and flower into A concerned and enlightened leadership on the part of perents in leading their schools to new high levels of performance? Will' decentralization and community control affect the morale of ghetto communities, 211 -203 alter the children's self image, and change their self-conceptions about fate control? Will decentralization and community control change the perceptive

systems of all those involved -- teachers, pupils, parents, community leaders --

in such a way that it will lead co a creative and cohesive effort and will express

itself in not only a high level of participation in community affairs, but a new high level of school performance and achievement on the part of the children

involved? Will decentralisation and community control break down the barriers

to rapid and effective educational mobility on the part of ghetto children and enable them to enter the occupational system in at least numbers equal to their pruportion in the population at large?

These questions are at the base of the assumptions made about educational change in the cities which have been discussed in this report. Notwithstanding

the claims made and the ensuing conflicts, the questions mentioned remain only questions and their implied assumptions remain assumptions. Very little research

has been done and very little research is being done with respect to these issues.

However, before we can turn systematically to the research questions involved,

It is necessary to quickly summarize the character of the urban educational

systems discussed in this report so that the implied research questions can be

related.

Types of School Svstems In Response To Social Movements for Decentralization and Communitv Control

The selected cities in this study may be viewed as being on a continuum

from a possibility of developing an integrated social system within the urban community to the opposite end of the continuum where no such possibility exists.

Another way of looking at the continuum for these cities Is to express it as

follows: a city (Roston) at one end within *filch there remains sufficient

flexibility in movement for change which includes the participation of all elements of the community, to the other end of the continuum where these factors

of flexibility are not present (Oakland) and in which the divisions created by

.specially race emphasize both a status quo within the community and within the 212 -204 - school system. Another way of examining this continuum 1s to describe it as at one end of the continuum a city with a relatively low percentage of Negro population and, at the other end, a city with a fairly high percentage of Negroes.

The examination of the continuum begins with the city of Boston:

1. Soston

Boston is a city with a low percentage of Negores. However, it has, over the past few years, been concentrating on discussions and movements

towards decentralization and community control. Decentralization and community control has moved towards importance and towards State bills along these lines out of the rise of ideological movements which stress the concepts of decentra-

lizeition and community control rather than out of the demographic and social characteristics of the city. Because of its basic urban characteristics there

remains a small chance that Boston will ch3ose the path of school integration and community integration rather than decentralization.

2. Cleveland

Cleveland is a city with a high percentage of Negro population.

This Negro population is highly concentrated in segregated areas of the city.

However, the ideology of decentralization and community control and the social movements wh!ch express it do not have the dynamic impetus that is found in other cities. The school system, therefore, has moved more in the direction of administrative decentralization with a great deal of school principal autonomy

rather than in the direction of decentralization and community control.

3. Washington. D, C.

This is a city with a very high proportion of its population

Negro, who are highly concentrated in alarge number of segregated areas. It

Is a city with a very high proportion of its school population being Negro.The

School Board and the school system which also has high proportions of Negro members in it has been less concerned with decentralization and community control and more concerned with its problems of improving the system as a whole. However,21 It hae mnuod Pwnortmisntally to tho ottahltehmont of An ovnorimential Oprontraltvod -205-

school project Involving two schools. It has endowed the decentralized school ' project with a good deal of autonomy, but has retained the final legal authority with regard to these schools.

4. Chicago

This vast city, with its enormous school system, has taken small steps towards administrative decentralization. In establishing threefold decentralized school system, it placed most of the city's Negro population in one of the three districts. In doing this, they have created a 4rtinnl gystcm that is still highly centralized but has both the appearance and the flexibility of some degree of decentrall7atinn on a very extensive basis. It has also permitted a small and vocal district in the area which contains the most of the city's Negro population to experiment with a high degree of autonomy.The city of Chicago falls somewhere in the middle of the continuum of cities which run from possibilities and characteristics of an integrated system to the other end of the continuum where such possibilities are absent.

5. Philadelphia

Philadelphia has been experimenting with partial administrative decentralization and has been utilizing large numbers of experimental projects

In different parts of the city to give the city school system some degree of flexibility. There is some pressure for school decentralization and community control on the part of some segments of the community, however, these very same segments arc more interested in performance and achievement levels than in the pure ideology of decentralization and community control.

6. Detroit

Detroit has strong ideological movements towards decentralization and community control. It has been expressed in political efforts in the city and the state. These efforts have resulted In state law which has recently been overruled and now Detroit is experimenting with the concept of magnet schools. The pressures for racial subdivisions aiong segregated lines are214 -206 - powerful in this city and the chances for separatism are much stronger than the chances for integration which is assumed in the concept of the magnet schools.

2,_ Los Angeles

This city has moved towards partial administrative decentralization.

It operates in a school system with community advisory committees. It has a very capable and active administration which has been fostering a variety of school community projects in various parts of the city. There are a number of conflicting ideological movements both In the direction of racially and ethnic separatistic subdivisions and efforts and movements for integration. Legal attempts have been made to establish decentralization and commuoity control with court barriers to this. The chances for integration are low and the chances for separatism without the implementation of decentralization and community control high.

8. Oakland

This is a city not in motion. This Is a city in which the social system of the status quo is uppermost. This is a city where separatism is deep, and emotions are high. This is a city with strong movements towards decentralization and community control, but at the same time, strong movements opposing this. The result is an equilibrium which maintains the status quo with ineffective leadership on both sides and deep emotion pervading the entire urban atmosphere.

Assumoticns About Decentralizatim

it is necessary to select out the key assumptions about decentralization and to develop research which would test them, and thereby enable us to go back to these cities and to others with the findings from this research and translate

them Into developmental changes within these cities.The following basic assumptions about decentralization are detailed and the research involved described as follows: 215 -207-

1. Assumption That Decentralization Will Energize the School System By Re- distributing Power Within It.

Let us examine further a subdivision of the Chicago School System such as the Woodlawn School District. Let us establish a research project whose purpose it would be to induce the Chicago School System to create in Woodlawn

the utmost autonomy. Let this be done by obtaining a statement from the school people and community leaders in Woodiawn as to all of the autonomy demands that

they can think cf. Such a project should be established for at least a three year period and sufficient resources supplied to the community and school leaders

for conducting the school affairs of their autonomous school district. At the

same time, establish a research assessment project with the cooperation of the

school district leaders to assess to changes accomplished by the provision and

the granting of power as defined by the local community and given to them. At

the same time, select a comparbble area in a city like Philadelphia In which a

similar project Is set up and is established in a partially administrative decentralized system. A similar project in terms of edu,:atIonal changes and

their measurement differing, however, in that it is not an autonomous school district with its own powers to make decisions, but that it is a project guided' and directed to a large extent from central school headquarters.

Each project should operate at a level from $30,000. to $40,000. a year

for a three year period and the cost would be about $180,000. to $240,000. for

the entire study.

2. The Assumption That the Most Powerful Energy Source is That of Parents and the Community At Large.

The project on pier should include the testing of this assumption since the power implied in Assumption iis the power which would accrue to

the parents and the community if they had the autonomy and the resources to

conduct their school affairs.

216 -208-

3. The Assumption That Decentralization Offers Professionals An Ally in the Participation of Parents Enhancing the Professionals Attempts at Improving The School System.

Sioue Los Angeles has a high lev31 of competence in its administration and in many of its teaching staffs, let us select the Los Angeles School System to study this assumption. The Watts High School in Los Angeles has an advisory community board. A research project should be established which would undertake, over a three year period, to study the relationships and the participation of this parental board in its impact on the professionals employed or on the staff of the school.At the same time, the Morgan School District in Washington, D.C. should also be selected for a study of the relationships and ipact of its community advisory board on its professional staff. The purpose of this com- parison would be that the Morgan School District has a great deal of autonomy; the Watts High School has much less autonomy, and at the same time, is open a great deal to the impact of the school system's administrative specialized personnel. If the participation of parents constitutes an important ally to professionals In improving their school, then the Morgan Schpol should make greater progress than the Wat's High School. At the same time, the Ninth Street

Elementary School in the Mexicar area in West Los Angeles should also be selected. here is a school where the professionals, with the aid of central school board specialists, are making a tremendous impact on their pupils and on their community without an advisory community board with any of the powers of either the Watts High School or the Morgan School District. A three year controlled study of these three types of schools would clarify this assumption.

This study, it is estimated, would run at about $20,000. to $25,000. a year for each school and, therefore, would cost from $180,000. to $225,000.

4. The Assumption That Decentralization Constitutes a Means of Reducing the Size of Bureuucracy.

The school system in Chicago which has Instituted the threefold decentralized system, and the Cleveland School System which has a form of 217 -209 - administrative decentralization should be selected and examined carefully In

terms of the budgetary cost changes. The budgetary cost changes over a one

year period should be studied as to whether decentralization of this type has

in any way reduced the size of bureaucracy. The Manning Tables can be obtained

for these school systems prior to the establishment of decentralized administra-

tive systems and following the establishment of these systems. Administrative

personnel for these two time periods can be separated from staff personnel.

Changes in appointments and positions can be determined and criteria established

for defining administrative decisions in these two time periods. At the same

time, a third city should be selected, such as Detroit, which has not adopted decentralization, but is now experimenting with magnet schools to c:atermine also in the same t-ae period, the size of admi6strative ataffs and the size

of staffs before the adoption of magnet schools and after the adoption of magnet schools.

This study should cost from about $25,000. to $30,000. per year for

the three cities and, therefore, the total cost should run about $75,000. to

$105,000. At the same time, this study could examine the related -

5. Assumption That Decreasing the Size of Units Increases The Efficiency of the Total System.

6. The Assumption That Decentralization Reduces the Size of Bureaucratic 11rits and Therbby Reduces Ali:nation and Anomie.

This study should be launched in relationship to the study on redusing

the size of the bureaucracy through decentralization.However, it should be a separate study in the same cities and should address itself to the attempt

to measure the Impact of administrative decentralization on indices of alienation and anomie In these cities for selected subdistricts and for selected areas of

the bureaucracy. This study, however, has a number of built in difficulties.

it involves the need for obtaining a measure of alineation and anomie prior to the institution of a reduction of the size of the bureaucratic units, and 218 since this cannot be obtained, it demands the creation of en experimental study. -210 -

A school system such as this to be found In Chicago or Philadelphia would have

to be identified which would be willing to establish a small decentralized

school area whereby it would be possible to develop some measures of alienation

and anomie before the district was established, and study the changes and

attempt to measure them after the new subdistrict had been established. By

maintaining contact with each of these school systems in this report, It might

be possible to learn of a move in this direction in one of these cities in time

to establish this kind of an experimental project. Under the circumstances,

no cost estimate is feasible.

7. The Assumption That Decentralization Will Improve The Quality of Education In Central Areas of Major Cities.

Much has been written about the inadequacy of public school systems,

and especially the terrible inadequacies of public schools in the ghetto areas

of the city.The shabby and outmoded school buildings have been described,

the ineffective teaching quality of much of the staff has been written about,

and the limited and often incompetent utilization of teaching materials which,

in many cases, are claimed to be inappropriate and irrelevant has been much

discussed. It has been argued that the Improvement in quality of education

can come about only through tremendous amounts of new financial resources for

these school areas. On the other hand, the Coleman Report point. out that the

resources of the school system and even the system itself have little, if any,

actual effect on educational achievements and that the two major determinants

are the family background of thl student and the influence of the student's

peer group.

To provide adequate answers to this assumption, it is necessary to

select three urban uhoto areas:

a) a small ghetto area In Detroit should be selected and

declared an experimental decentralized district. This area should be provided

with tremendous financial resources for the improvement of its school system. 2.1A -211 -

b)a second ghetto area should be selected in Oakland, California and similarly declared an experimental decentralized district.This school area should concentrate on a program of working with the parents of children

In these schools fethe purpose of motivating these children to school achievement. Secondly, a small experimental busing program should be estab-

lished in order to provide a mixed pupil population. These two factors should provide, if carefully designed, the necessary crucial variables for producing change in school and pupil achievement in accordance with the Coleman Report.

A third small school district should be Included from the Mexican area in

West Los Angeles to introduce the additional variable of ethnic differences.

The school district in Los Angeles that should be included is the one which already is experimenting on the part of the school faculty in affecting pupil motivation through parents.

This experimental project should be established for a three year period with the necessary assessment resources to measure changes In these three areas over a three year period.

Depending on the size of the decentralized sub-districts created, the annual cost of each of these projects would run anywhere from $50,000. to

$100,000. per year.Therefore, the annual cost would be anywhere from $150,000. to $300,000. per year and the total project for the three year period would run from $450,000. to $900,000.

8. The Assumption That Decentralization Will Solve the Problems of The Advantages Accruing to Children With Parents of High Educational and Economic Bae.kground.,

It is argued that social class milieu is the major factor in educational achievement. it is arg,Jed that social class milieu is more important than socill integration for educational achievement.On this basis it

Is maintaineq that the higher the educational level of all the children's parents in a school, the higher the achievement of children of all backgrounds. Two small school districts should be selected, The first should be220 -212 - a segregated ghetto small school district made up of either Japanese or

Mexican pupils and parents. The second should be a small middle-class suburban school district. The first school district should be the object of a controlled and emphatic program of effecting and improving family and motivation for their children's school achievement. The second school district should have no changes introduced into it by the experiment. Over a three year period both districts should be subject to assessment of child performance.

If the comparisons are valid and the controls carefully designed, and the ghetto school children's rate of achievement significantly Increases or equals that of the suburban district children, then it should be clear that other factors are at work other than social class milieu in child performance.

Related to the basic assumptions about decentralization is a fun - damental assumption mbout community control. This assumption has a variety of forms, but basically it states that community control will widen public participation on the part of ghetto residents and lead to educational restructuring and Introduce new incentives for higher participation on the part of lower socio-economic groups. These high levels of participation will inevitably introduce such social changes as to make for effective teaching and high level performance on the part of pupils.

This assumption can perhaps be best tested In ccnnection with a project in Philadelphia In a school district just north of the University of

Pennsylvania. Here, a number of community residents in an urban black ghetto are Involved In a project for decentralizing a city high school to create a more effective learning environment. This project is in effect and pupil performance data can be obtained beginning with the project's starting date and records can be obtained about the project and its performan.e since Its initiation. it can be studied for the amount of community participation, and the quality and character of it;it also can be studied as to whether this community participation has had a profound effect on restructuring education221 -213 - or as to whether the major influences in educational changes have come from

the participation of University of Pennsylvania faculty in this project. It has been in operation for about a year and it can be followed for at least another two years in order to determine the amount and nature of change. It

is possible that this project established some assessment means at its initiation out! therefore, it should be possible to obtain this data. In any case, since

it has close connection with the University of Pennsylvania, this is one of the few places inhere cooperative project relationships exist between the

University and an urban school district on the issues of decentralization and community control, and it would be of extreme interest to support this under- taking and follow it.

Solutions to Problems of Decentralization

1. Supplementary School Educational Systems for Ethnic Groups

In the course of the history of ethnic and racial groups in the

United States, they were faced with a large number of problems in adjusting to both the new urban communities they found themselves in, and the linguistic and cultural differences they faced. In order to enable them to adjust to these problems, they, in a number of instances, developed their own supplementary school educational systems. These were a variety of types of schooling which either followed on the regular school day in facilities whleh they provided themselves or on Sundays in Sunday School facilities, or In the utilization of evening schools for newly arrived ethnic groups.The American Negro as the most recent Immigrant to the urban areas of thu United States has encouAtered many of the same types of problems, but has not been assisted either by

developing its own supplementary school educational system, or ; r the provision of special types of evening schools for them. It is therefore proposed that urban school systems develop a supplementary schmo educational system for ghetto blacks; these classes to be conducted following regular school hours 222 In facilities provided by the public school system due to the low economic -214 - levels of this group, and staffed by specially selected teachers for this work.

Such schooling would have to be on a voluntary level and there would be the opportunity for the assumptions about community control to be put Into effect. Here, too, the opportunity for black militant leaders to give expression to their assumptions about relevant teaching materials and their consequent effect on school pupil achievement.

In the course of establishing such a system of supplementary school educational systems, it would be possible to select out two or three key examples to study and to assess. The -sessment should include measuring the impact of this type of schooling on the pupil's achievement and performance, the selected teaching materials, and the performance and participation of teachers and parents

In this selected educational system. Since participation in the supplementary school would have to be voluntary, it would provide an opportunity to test the assumptions about community control and test the assumptions about the relationship between what has been described as relevant activities in the school and their ability to draw large numbers of pupils into extra educational activities and thus affect their performance levels.

These supplementary schools should be given as much autonomy as their teaching staff desire and have the resources to carry out educational activities to express the goals end the objectives of their teaching staffs.There should be as little school board influence and achrol administrative influence as possible in the organization, administration and the conduct of teaching in these schools as possible. The model for their organization and administration should be that of the ethnic supplementary school systems which have flourished In the past in the Un'ttsi St,. (;:s and still exl!t to some extent in parts of the United States.

The city to start in would be Los Angeles.

number of other assumed solutions have been encountered In the course of this study and might be translated into the following list of hypotheses: 223

I. Raising levels of professionalization In uroan schools and management -215 - I of them will raise the level of school performance.

2. Management of tensions sytems through mediation will increase the

effectiveness of schooling.

3. Mobilization for citizen participation will raise the level of

pupil performance.

4. New concepts of investment In central city schools will increase

the effectiveness of them.

5. A variety of heterogencous boundary lincs for city schools should be

developed on schools and school districts should not be defined in terms of one

type of boundary alone but that schools, if they had several types of boundaries,

would thereby increase the heterogeneity of its pupils and contribute to the peer

effect of the Coleman Report.

6. All city schools should be encouraged to have advisory councils and

cs this would have an impact on increasing school effectiveness.

7. Sub-school districts of the city should have Boards of Trustees,

the 'by de-emphasizing limited community control and provide a more stable type

of leadership for the sub-school districts thereby Increasing their effectiveness.

8. There must be effective education in all schools no matter what the

percentage of racial distribution. While negro separatism constitutes a risk of

fragmentation of public school education, it may also be the basis for a new

pluralism and a more effective educationalequality for all schools and children.

9. Design schools which blend school experience with non-school

experience under the control and guidance of the school teaching staff In such a

way as to interrelate classroom learning with experience in a variety of community

Institutions so as to Increase the immediate practical relevancy of the classroom

experience and effect the learning motivation of the pupils involved. Which types

of school system a)the traditional school system, b) the supplementary school

system, c) the blended school-non-school experience system, provides the most

effective solution for assisting social mobility? 224 -216.-

10. Does the "magnet" type of school enhance significantly the movement

towards integration and mixed peer classroom population and higher levels of performance, or does It leave the system of segregation of the city untouched and

thereby the school performance levels untouched?

11. Do city busing programs, where they have been tried voluntarily such

as in Los Angeles, affect pupil peer mixtures and pupil performance levels?

The collaboration and interest of universities in the issues of decen-

tralization and community control for the cities studied were not found to be overwhelming. The cooperative relationships which do exist can be outlined as follows:

In Boston - there is work being conducted by Tufts, Harvard and 0.1.T.

In Chicago - the participation of the University of Chicago in the Woodlawn organization and its involvement in the whole general problem of decentralization in the city.

In Philadelphia - the involvement of the University of Pennsylvania in especially the experimental project on the decentralization of a high school In the University of Pennsylvania area.

In Detroit - the participation of the school of Education and the Urban Studies enter in issues of school decentralization and educational research.

The limited amount of involvement of universities in the areas of the

particular cities of this study is a matter of major concern. The universities

in these areas, as well as universities in areas not in this study, need to pay

attention to the problem of urban education and the related problem of a multi-

racial society's accommodations.The research proposed cuts across disciplines

and traditional proem categories.Many segments of the university would

necessarily be involved in these research undertakings, and by their involvement

would stimulate major resources and talent In the university in conjunction with

large federal resources for their solution and modification.

The research listed has been drawn up with a concern for priorities. It

has also been drawn up with a concern for the most relevant urban location for

each research project both for the necessary urban and educational factors and 225 -217- /- I 5.. the consequences of the impact of the research on the local school community.

226