DOCSLIB.ORG

Author's Personal Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Author's Personal Copy Author's personal copy Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123 (2012) 766–778 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Naming the Bristol dinosaur, Thecodontosaurus: politics and science in the 1830s Michael J. Benton School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Several dinosaurs were reported from 1824 to 1842, the latter being the year in which Richard Owen Received 28 March 2012 named the ‘Dinosauria’. The fourth dinosaur ever named was Thecodontosaurus, based on numerous Received in revised form 5 July 2012 isolated bones from Late Triassic cave deposits, excavated in 1834 from a working limestone quarry in Accepted 14 July 2012 Bristol in south-west England. The genus was named in 1836, and it was the first dinosaur ever reported Available online 4 August 2012 from the Triassic. The remains were shown first to Samuel Stutchbury, curator of the museum of the Bristol Institution. He recruited the noted Bristol surgeon and anatomist Henry Riley to assist in Keywords: interpreting the bones, but local amateur geologist, the Reverend David Williams, was competing to be Dinosaur the first to report the fossils. The squabble between Stutchbury and Williams is reconstructed from Triassic Bristol manuscript letters, and it highlights the clash between individuals, but also between supposed Samuel Stutchbury professionals and amateurs in these early days of the development of geology and palaeontology as Henry Riley sciences. David Williams ß 2012 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction be named from the Triassic was Plateosaurus, reported a year later, in 1837, from southern Germany (Meyer, 1837). The circumstances of the discovery and naming of the first The importance of the specimens, the shortage of previously dinosaurs ever reported, Megalosaurus Buckland, 1824, Iguanodon published information about their discovery, and the emergence of Mantell, 1825, and Hylaeosaurus Mantell, 1833, have been outlined some fascinating new archival resources, provide the purpose for by several authors (e.g. Spokes, 1927; Curwen, 1940; Swinton, this account. 1951; Colbert, 1968; Delair and Sarjeant, 1975; Taquet, 1984; Relevant archives in the Bristol Record Office, B Bond, Smeaton Buffetaut, 1987; Torrens, 1992, 1995; Torrens, 2012). The fourth Road, Bristol, BS1 6XN (BRO), the Geology Department, City 1 dinosaur to be named from England, and perhaps from the world, Museum & Art Gallery, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1RL (BRSMG), the Thecodontosaurus antiquus Riley and Stutchbury, 1836, has largely Reference Library, Central Library, Bristol, College Green, Bristol, escaped historical notice, however. It was the first dinosaur to be BS1 5TL (CRL), and Somerset Heritage Service, Somerset Heritage reported from the Triassic period, the earliest division of the Centre, Brunel Way, Norton Fitzwarren, Taunton, Somerset, TA2 Mesozoic Era, during which dinosaurs originated, and it has 6SF (TTNCM), provided documents relevant to the discovery and subsequently been shown to be one of the most basal sauropo- later history of work on Thecodontosaurus. domorph dinosaurs, one of the three major divisions of Dinosauria (Huxley, 1870; Marsh, 1892; Seeley, 1895; Huene, 1908a; 2. The location Gauthier, 1986; Galton, 1990; Benton et al., 2000; Benton, 2004; Langer and Benton, 2006). The first relatively complete dinosaur to Specimens of ‘saurian animals’ were first noted in autumn, 1834 from the limestone quarries of Durdham Down, Clifton. At that time, Clifton, located in the county of Somerset, was a separate E-mail address: [email protected]. town from Bristol, which was part of Gloucestershire. However, the 1 Determining the order of naming of the first dinosaurs is a retrospective two towns adjoined, and Clifton was formally incorporated into the exercise in several senses. First, these reptiles were identified merely as ‘giant city of Bristol in the 1830s. lizards’ or crocodiles in the 1820s and 1830s. Second, even after Owen had named These quarries are now largely infilled or built over, and there the Dinosauria in 1842 for Megalosaurus, Iguanodon, and Hylaeosaurus, Thecodon- tosaurus was not included. It was recognized as dinosaurian only in 1870 (Huxley, has been some confusion over their exact location, and the location 1870). Streptospondylus Meyer, 1832 from France was described as a crocodile, but of the dinosaur finds (Fig. 1). The first indication of the site is given includes some dinosaurian vertebrae (Allain, 2001) and so might be a valid as ‘the quarry east of Durdham Down’ by Anon. (1835). dinosaurian name. Macrodontophion Zborzewski, 1834 from the Ukraine was Information in papers by Etheridge (1870) and Moore (1881) sometimes called a dinosaur too, but is based on an unidentifiable tooth. So, if Streptospondylus is a valid dinosaur, then Thecodontosaurus becomes the fifth allowed David Whiteside in 1982 to confirm this and identify the dinosaur to be named from anywhere in the world. site at the east end of a series of old quarries, and located beside a 0016-7878/$ – see front matter ß 2012 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.012 Author's personal copy M.J. Benton / Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123 (2012) 766–778 767 Fig. 1. Map of north Clifton and the Downs, Bristol, showing five suggested locations of the Thecodontosaurus find in 1834, numbered 1–5. The key map (top left) shows the distribution of Triassic exposures in England and Wales, and the locations of Bristol and London. The correct find spot is number 1. set of steps called Quarry Steps (Fig. 1; National Grid Reference, ST the site of the reptilian quarry on the eastern side of Durdham 572747; Benton and Spencer, 1995, p. 89). Etheridge (1870, Figs. 4, Down.’’ Moore (1881, p. 72) confirmed this, mentioning specifi- 5) gave two drawings showing the reptile deposit at about 320 ft cally a place known as ‘The Quarry and The Quarry Steps’ and states above mean sea level and noted (Etheridge, 1870, p. 188) that ‘‘the ‘‘Looking from it [the platform of Quarry Steps], along the Down spot where these remains were found is no longer recognizable or escarpment to the west, the eye takes in Bellevue Terrace determinable, having been many years ago quarried away, and the [=‘Belgrave Terrace’; numbers 19–23 Upper Belgrave Road], on site built upon. Fortunately, we have records of the exact position; the edge of the Down; and it was between these houses and the and many years since, W. Sanders . most accurately determined quarry, a distance probably of 200 yards, along the same face of Author's personal copy 768 M.J. Benton / Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123 (2012) 766–778 limestone, and on the same horizon, that the deposit containing The site of discovery of Thecodontosaurus, according to the the Thecodontosaurian remains was found. Unfortunately the testimony of Etheridge (1870) and Moore (1881) may still be seen, precise spot is unknown . and built over’’. This is only partly true, largely overgrown, forming a cliff behind a block of flats, and with as Etheridge (1870) had first-hand evidence from people who had an old set of stone steps (Quarry Steps) descending beside it. The witnessed the discoveries. First, he relied on testimony from topotype quarry contains at least one fissure with a lithology William Sanders (1799–1875), a keen amateur geologist who lived similar to that of the bone-bearing matrix, but all bones appear to in Clifton, and who from 1835 onwards produced a detailed have been quarried away. geological map of the whole area (Clark, 2004). Further, Etheridge Some confusion might arise from the slightly later discovery of a (1870, Fig. 6) was also able to reproduce a sketch he had been given bone-bearing fissure on Durdham Down, but this time a Pleistocene years before by Samuel Stutchbury, showing the position of the fissure containing fragmentary bones of ice age mammals, found bones in the cave breccia as they were being removed. early in 1842, and in which David Williams took an interest. He had Huene (1908a, p. 191) seemingly misunderstood Moore, begun his geological career in the 1820s with studies on the famous naming the site of discovery as Avenue Quarry at the end of Mendips bone caves at Banwell, Holwell, Bleadon, and Uphill. Avenue Road, but Moore (1881) had identified this Avenue Quarry However, Stutchbury and Riley carried out the excavations at as distinct from the Thecodontosaurus find site just noted, as a Durdham Down and specimens of rhinoceros, elephant, horse, location 680 yards away from Quarry Steps and terminating a hyaena, and bear were extracted for the Museum (Stutchbury, 1842; transect of workings that hosted fissures of different ages. Further, Wilson, 1886, 1890). The exact location of the fissure is unknown, Perceval (1907, p. 5) suggested a third possible location for the but it seems to have been in a quarry on the south side of Stoke Road, 1834 Thecodontosaurus discovery: ‘‘The exposure of rock from at map ref. ST 567752; the fauna indicates an Ipswichian age which they were obtained used to be visible on the west side at the (Hawkins and Tratman, 1977). south end of Worrall Road. This exposure is represented in the maps that accompanied Wright’s Bristol Directories of the years 3. The experts 1870–1874. At p. 111 of Arrowsmith’s Dictionary of Bristol, 1884, the locality is thus described: ‘Reptilian remains were found some The saurian bones found by the quarrymen apparently became years ago in a dike of new red conglomerate, near Lower Belgrave quite widely known among naturalists in Bristol, and some were Road Durdham Down.’ The exposure in Worrall Road is no longer brought to the Bristol Institution, where Samuel Stutchbury was visible, having apparently been built over.’’ This is the further, curator from 1831 to 1850.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M.A. TAYLOR 1 and R.D. CLARK 2 Methodology and Repositories
    Ichthyosaurs from the Lower Lias (Lower Jurassic) of Banwell, Somerset ICHTHYOSAURS FROM THE LOWER LIAS (LOWER JURASSIC) OF BANWELL, SOMERSET M.A. TAYLOR 1 AND R.D. CLARK 2 Taylor, M.A. and Clark, R.D. 2016. Ichthyosaurs from the Lower Lias (Lower Jurassic) of Banwell, Somerset. Geoscience in South-West England, 14, 59–71. Two Lower Jurassic ichthyosaurs, lost in a 1940s air raid, are identified from archival records and surviving 19th century plaster casts distributed by their owner, the Bristol Institution for the Advancement of Science, Literature and the Arts. One was the type specimen of Ichthyosaurus latimanus Owen, 1840. The other, initially labelled Ichthyosaurus intermedius Conybeare, 1822, was the first ichthyosaur in which remains of the soft tissue of the tail fin were identified, confirming Richard Owen’s earlier prediction. Unfortunately Owen’s published account conflated the two specimens, apparently by the erroneous transposition of a passage of text. Owen possibly regarded the second specimen as the type of I. intermedius. In 1889 Richard Lydekker referred it to Ichthyosaurus conybeari Lydekker, 1888. For unknown reasons, he caused further confusion by suppressing the fact that both ichthyosaur specimens came from Banwell. Banwell is shown to have been a minor but significant source of Lower Lias fossil vertebrates, and also the type locality of the fish Tetragonolepis monilifer Agassiz, 1837, apparently from quarries in the lowermost Jurassic beds at Knightcott. The Bristol Institution assisted Edward Wilson (1808–1888) to obtain at least some of the West Country marine reptiles which his brother Dr Thomas Bellerby Wilson (1807–1865) donated to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Silurian Rugose Corals of the Central and Southwest Great Basin
    Silurian Rugose Corals of the Central and Southwest Great Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 777 Silurian Rugose Corals of the Central and Southwest Great Basin By CHARLES W. MERRIAM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 777 A stratigraphic-paleontologic investigation of rugose corals as aids in age detern2ination and correlation of Silurian rocks of the Great Basin with those of other regions UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600082 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price $2.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-00363 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Systematic and descriptive palaeontology-Continued Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Family Streptelasmatidae-Continued Purpose and scope of investigation-------------------------------­ 1 Dalmanophyllum ------------------------------------------------- 32 History of investigation ----------------------------------------------­ 1 Family Stauriidae ------------------------------------------------------- 32 Methods of study-------------------------------------------------------­ 2 Cyathoph y llo ides-------------------------------------------------- 32 Acknowledgments------------------------------------------------------- 4 Palaeophyllum
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19Th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology
    Headwaters Volume 26 Article 14 2009 Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology Larry E. Davis College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Larry E. (2009) "Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology," Headwaters: Vol. 26, 96-126. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters/vol26/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Headwaters by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LARRY E. DAVIS Mary Anning of Lyme Regis 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology Ludwig Leichhardt, a 19th century German explorer noted in a letter, “… we had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of the Princess of Palaeontology, Miss Anning. She is a strong, energetic spinster of about 28 years of age, tanned and masculine in expression …” (Aurousseau, 1968). Gideon Mantell, a 19th century British palaeontologist, made a less flattering remark when he wrote in his journal, “… sallied out in quest of Mary An- ning, the geological lioness … we found her in a little dirt shop with hundreds of specimens piled around her in the greatest disorder. She, the presiding Deity, a prim, pedantic vinegar looking female; shred, and rather satirical in her conversation” (Curwin, 1940). Who was Mary Anning, this Princess of Palaeontology and Geological Lioness (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Enigmatic Dinosauriform Caseosaurus Crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and Its Implications for Early Dinosaur Evolution
    A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution MATTHEW G. BARON and MEGAN E. WILLIAMS Baron, M.G. and Williams, M.E. 2018. A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 129–145. The holotype specimen of the Late Triassic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis is redescribed and evaluated phylogenetically for the first time, providing new anatomical information and data on the earliest dinosaurs and their evolution within the dinosauromorph lineage. Historically, Caseosaurus crosbyensis has been considered to represent an early saurischian dinosaur, and often a herrerasaur. More recent work on Triassic dinosaurs has cast doubt over its supposed dinosaurian affinities and uncertainty about particular features in the holotype and only known specimen has led to the species being regarded as a dinosauriform of indeterminate position. Here, we present a new diagnosis for Caseosaurus crosbyensis and refer additional material to the taxon—a partial right ilium from Snyder Quarry. Our com- parisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Caseosaurus crosbyensis belongs in a clade with herrerasaurs and that this clade is the sister taxon of Dinosauria, rather than positioned within it. This result, along with other recent analyses of early dinosaurs, pulls apart what remains of the “traditional” group of dinosaurs collectively termed saurischians into a polyphyletic assemblage and implies that Dinosauria should be regarded as composed exclusively of Ornithoscelida (Ornithischia + Theropoda) and Sauropodomorpha. In addition, our analysis recovers the enigmatic European taxon Saltopus elginensis among herrerasaurs for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bristol Dinosaur Project
    Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123 (2012) 210–225 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Teaching Perspective The Bristol Dinosaur Project Michael J. Benton *, Remmert Schouten, Edward J.A. Drewitt, Pedro Viegas School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Dinosaurs have been fascinating to the widest public since the 1840s, and that interest has grown step- Received 18 April 2011 wise ever since. Public interest has been harnessed over the years especially by museums in blockbuster Received in revised form 8 July 2011 exhibitions, and in the form of best-selling books and films. Here we describe a major educational Accepted 8 July 2011 initiative, the Bristol Dinosaur Project, which has run for ten years and has reached tens of thousands of Available online 5 August 2011 children and adults, supported by substantial funding. The Bristol Dinosaur Project focuses on the fourth dinosaur ever named in the world, Thecodontosaurus, discovered in Bristol in 1834, and named in 1836. Keywords: The dinosaur is not in itself spectacular, being only 1–2 m long, but its evolutionary role as one of the first Dinosaurs plant-eating dinosaurs in the world justifies our current research, and provides a strong theme for the Education Engagement public presentation. Further, the fact that the dinosaur is found as disarticulated bones in ancient tropical Outreach cave systems, allows us to develop numerous key themes with all age groups: the geological time scale, Geosciences education continental drift, reconstruction of ancient environments, modern landscape analogues, the rock cycle, evolution, biomechanics, and critical assessment of geological and palaeontological evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of Antetonitrus Ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): Implications for the Origins of Sauropoda
    THE ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF ANTETONITRUS INGENIPES (SAUROPODIFORMES, DINOSAURIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINS OF SAUROPODA Blair McPhee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2013 i ii ABSTRACT A thorough description and cladistic analysis of the Antetonitrus ingenipes type material sheds further light on the stepwise acquisition of sauropodan traits just prior to the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Although the forelimb of Antetonitrus and other closely related sauropododomorph taxa retains the plesiomorphic morphology typical of a mobile grasping structure, the changes in the weight-bearing dynamics of both the musculature and the architecture of the hindlimb document the progressive shift towards a sauropodan form of graviportal locomotion. Nonetheless, the presence of hypertrophied muscle attachment sites in Antetonitrus suggests the retention of an intermediary form of facultative bipedality. The term Sauropodiformes is adopted here and given a novel definition intended to capture those transitional sauropodomorph taxa occupying a contiguous position on the pectinate line towards Sauropoda. The early record of sauropod diversification and evolution is re- examined in light of the paraphyletic consensus that has emerged regarding the ‘Prosauropoda’ in recent years. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express sincere gratitude to Adam Yates for providing me with the opportunity to do ‘real’ palaeontology, and also for gladly sharing his considerable knowledge on sauropodomorph osteology and phylogenetics. This project would not have been possible without the continued (and continual) support (both emotionally and financially) of my parents, Alf and Glenda McPhee – Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
    Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Giants from the Past | Presented by the Field Museum Learning Center 2 Pre-Lesson Preparation
    Giants from the Past Middle School NGSS: MS-LS4-1, MS-LS4-4 Lesson Description Learning Objectives This investigation focuses on the fossils of a particular • Students will demonstrate an understanding that group of dinosaurs, the long-necked, herbivores known as particular traits provide advantages for survival sauropodomorphs. Students will gain an understanding by using models to test and gather data about the of why certain body features provide advantages to traits’ functions. Background survival through the use of models. Students will analyze • Students will demonstrate an understanding of and interpret data from fossils to synthesize a narrative ancestral traits by investigating how traits appear for the evolution of adaptations that came to define a and change (or evolve) in the fossil record well-known group of dinosaurs. over time. • Students will demonstrate an understanding of how traits function to provide advantages Driving Phenomenon in a particular environment by inferring daily Several traits, inherited and adapted over millions of years, activities that the dinosaur would have performed provided advantages for a group of dinosaurs to evolve for survival. into the largest animals that ever walked the Earth. Giant dinosaurs called sauropods evolved over a period of 160 Time Requirements million years. • Four 40-45 minute sessions As paleontologists continue to uncover new specimens, Prerequisite Knowledge they see connections across time and geography that lead to a better understanding of how adaptations interact • Sedimentary rocks form in layers, the newer rocks with their environment to provide unique advantages are laid down on top of the older rocks. depending on when and where animals lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Rev. W.B. Clarke D.F
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol. 141, p. 1–31, 2008 ISSN 0035-9173/08/02001–31 $4.00/1 Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Rev. W.B. Clarke d.f. branagan and t.g. vallance Abstract: Four previously unpublished letters, with memoranda of Rev. W.B. Clarke to W.S. Macleay, written between 1842 and 1845 clarify the ideas of both about the mode of formation of coal and the age of the stratigraphical succession in the Sydney Basin. Clarke makes the first mention of his discovery of the Lake Macquarie fossil forest, the first identification of the zeolite stilbite in New South Wales and gives details of his study of the volcanic rocks of the Upper Hunter Valley. Keywords: Clarke, Macleay, coal formation, Sydney Basin, stilbite INTRODUCTION essentially self-contained, although, of course, almost no letter can stand alone, but depends When Dr Thomas G. Vallance died in 1993 a on the correspondents. Each letter has some considerable amount of his historical jottings importance in dealing with aspects of Clarke’s and memorabilia on the history of Australian geological work, as will be noted. science, and particularly geology, was passed The first and longest letter, which is ac- on to me (David Branagan) through his wife, companied by a long series of memoranda and Hilary Vallance. For various reasons, only now a labelled sketch fits between two letters from have I been able to delve, even tentatively, into MacLeay (28 June & 4 July 1842) to Clarke. this treasure house. The present note con- Both these MacLeay letters have been repro- cerns four letters of the Reverend W.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Anning: Princess of Palaeontology and Geological Lioness
    The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon Volume 84 Issue 1 Article 8 1-6-2012 Mary Anning: Princess of Palaeontology and Geological Lioness Larry E. Davis College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Larry E. (2012) "Mary Anning: Princess of Palaeontology and Geological Lioness," The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon: Vol. 84: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass/vol84/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Figure. 1. Portrait of Mary Anning, in oils, probably painted by William Gray in February, 1842, for exhibition at the Royal Academy, but rejected. The portrait includes the fossil cliffs of Lyme Bay in the background. Mary is pointing at an ammonite, with her companion Tray dutifully curled beside the ammonite protecting the find. The portrait eventually became the property of Joseph, Mary‟s brother, and in 1935, was presented to the Geology Department, British Museum, by Mary‟s great-great niece Annette Anning (1876-1938). The portrait is now in the Earth Sciences Library, British Museum of Natural History. A similar portrait in pastels by B.J.M. Donne, hangs in the entry hall of the Geological Society of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Skull Remains of the Dinosaur Saturnalia Tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil): with Comments on the Early Evolution of Sauropodomorph Feeding Behaviour
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Skull remains of the dinosaur Saturnalia tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil): With comments on the early evolution of sauropodomorph feeding behaviour 1 2 1 Mario BronzatiID *, Rodrigo T. MuÈ llerID , Max C. Langer * 1 LaboratoÂrio de Paleontologia, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de a1111111111 São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 2 Centro de Apoio à Pesquisa PaleontoloÂgica, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] (MB); [email protected] (MCL) a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Saturnalia tupiniquim is a sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Late Triassic (Carnian±c. 233 OPEN ACCESS Ma) Santa Maria Formation of Brazil. Due to its phylogenetic position and age, it is important for studies focusing on the early evolution of both dinosaurs and sauropodomorphs. The Citation: Bronzati M, MuÈller RT, Langer MC (2019) Skull remains of the dinosaur Saturnalia tupiniquim osteology of Saturnalia has been described in a series of papers, but its cranial anatomy (Late Triassic, Brazil): With comments on the early remains mostly unknown. Here, we describe the skull bones of one of its paratypes (only in evolution of sauropodomorph feeding behaviour. the type-series to possess such remains) based on CT Scan data. The newly described ele- PLoS ONE 14(9): e0221387. https://doi.org/ ments allowed estimating the cranial length of Saturnalia and provide additional support for 10.1371/journal.pone.0221387 the presence of a reduced skull (i.e. two thirds of the femoral length) in this taxon, as typical Editor: JuÈrgen Kriwet, University of Vienna, of later sauropodomorphs.
    [Show full text]