DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Input to OHCHR Expert Workshops on Prohibition of Incitement To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Input to OHCHR Expert Workshops on Prohibition of Incitement To Input to OHCHR Expert workshops on prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred while ensuring respect of the freedom of expression Addendum I. Europe ..........................................................................................................................3 1. Albania...........................................................................................................................3 1.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...............3 2. Austria............................................................................................................................3 2.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...............3 3. Azerbaijan......................................................................................................................4 3.1 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both........4 4. Belgium..........................................................................................................................5 4.1. Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ..............5 4.2 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both........5 5. Bulgaria..........................................................................................................................8 5.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...............8 5.2 Other information or observations in relation to public discussion of both..............8 6. Czech Republic..............................................................................................................9 6.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...............9 6.2 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both......10 7. Denmark ......................................................................................................................13 1.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............13 1.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech..............................................................13 8. Estonia.........................................................................................................................14 8.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............14 9. France..........................................................................................................................14 9.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............14 9.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech..............................................................15 9.3 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both......16 10. Germany......................................................................................................................17 10.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........17 11. Greece .........................................................................................................................18 11.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........18 11.2 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both....18 12. Hungary .......................................................................................................................18 12.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........18 12.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech............................................................20 13. Iceland .........................................................................................................................20 13.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........20 14. Ireland..........................................................................................................................21 14.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........21 15. Italy ..............................................................................................................................21 15.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........21 15.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech............................................................22 16. Kyrgyzstan ...................................................................................................................22 16.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........22 17. Norway.........................................................................................................................22 17.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........22 17.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech............................................................23 18. Poland..........................................................................................................................23 18.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........23 19. Slovakia .......................................................................................................................23 19.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........23 19.2 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both....24 19.3 Relevant policies in relation to incitement to hatred and/or freedom of speech..25 1 20. Spain............................................................................................................................32 20.1 Examples of or information on relevant jurisprudence on incitement to hatred and/or freedom of speech............................................................................................32 20.2 Relevant policies in relation to incitement to hatred and/or freedom of speech..34 21. Switzerland ..................................................................................................................36 21.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........36 21.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech............................................................37 21.3 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both....37 21.4 Relevant jurisprudence on incitement to hatred and/or freedom of speech........40 22. Tajikistan......................................................................................................................41 22.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........41 23. Ukraine ........................................................................................................................42 23.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........42 23.2 Other information or observations in relation to the public discussion of both....43 23.3 Relevant policies in relation to incitement to hatred and/or freedom of speech..45 24. United Kingdom ...........................................................................................................48 24.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred ...........48 II. Africa ...........................................................................................................................49 1. Ghana ..........................................................................................................................49 1.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............49 1.2 Legislation protecting freedom of speech..............................................................50 2. Guinea Bissau .............................................................................................................50 2.1 Legislation protecting freedom of speech..............................................................50 3. Guinea Conakry...........................................................................................................50 3.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............50 4. Mali ..............................................................................................................................50 4.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............50 III. Asia Pacific .................................................................................................................50 1. Australia.......................................................................................................................50 1.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............51 2. Indonesia .....................................................................................................................51 2.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and religious hatred .............51 3. Malaysia.......................................................................................................................52 3.1 Legislation prohibiting incitement to national, racial and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KABAR KATHMANDU Lead Story Headline
    July 2017 | A Newsletter of the Embassy of Malaysia in Kathmandu Issue 1 KABAR KATHMANDU Lead Story Headline From the editor The first half of 2017 saw few activities that were undertaken in an effort to elevate bilateral relations between Malaysia and Nepal. We are happy to note that there is increasing interest from Nepal to engage with Malaysia on its nation building effort. We also saw the first discussion on the establishment of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Recruitment, Employment and Repatriation of Workers was Contents held in Kathmandu. In this issue, Kabar Kathmandu will also be highlighting the What’s happening 2 state of Pahang, one of the 13 states in Malaysia. Situated in Special Interest Articles 5 & 6 the east cost of Peninsular Malaysia, Pahang has declared 2017 as Visit Pahang Year and has lined up events and Tourism news 7 festivals galore for this purpose. We believe that through General Information 8 tourism, we could increase people–to–people contact between both sides that would benefit bilateral relations in the long run. Happy reading! Embassy of Malaysia Sanepa-2, Ring Road, Lalitpur, P.O. Box 24372 Kathmandu, Nepal +977-1-5545680/81 (General line), +977-1-5545689 (Immigration), +977-980-1008000 (Duty Officer/Emergency) Emel: [email protected] Visit our website at www.kln.gov.my/perwakilan/kathmandu Or interact with us through our official social media at: MalaysianEmbassyKathmandu MYEmbKTM What 2 What’s Happening HIMALAYA AIRLINES INAUGURAL FLIGHT TO KUALA LUMPUR Himalaya Airlines took its inaugural flight to Kuala Lumpur on 10 February 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • OL MYS 6/2018 28 December 2018
    PALAIS DES NATIONS • 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression REFERENCE: OL MYS 6/2018 28 December 2018 Excellency, I have the honour to address you in my capacity as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 34/18. Your Excellency’s Government has made several important and encouraging commitments to restore and protect freedom of expression in Malaysia. In light of these commitments, I am writing to provide a preliminary analysis of proposed and adopted legislation in the areas of sedition, press freedom, defamation, “fake news,” official secrets and film censorship, taking into consideration your Excellency’s Government’s obligations to respect, protect and promote the right to freedom of expression under international human rights law. I. INTRODUCTION Upon the election of the Pakatan Harapan coalition in May 2018, your Excellency’s Government promised to fight corruption and to “abolish laws that are oppressive and unfair”. In addition, the new Government has communicated to me its intention to reform laws and policies widely viewed as inconsistent with the country’s obligations under international human rights law. For instance, in June 2018, your Government responded to a communication concerning the Anti-Fake News Act of 2018 (ref. no MYS 1/2018), assuring this mandate that the Government had already begun the process of repealing the Act. At present, I understand that several laws that restrict freedom of opinion and expression in Malaysia remain in force.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    901 Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt Vol. 9, No. 5, October 2020 Malaysian Society’s Appreciation for Nationhood Symbols in the Face of Industrial Revolution 4.0 Challenges: An Initial Observation Mohamed Ali Haniffa#¹, Ayu Nor Azilah Mohamad*², Nor Azlah Sham Rambely#³ ¹ ³School of Languages, Civilisation and Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia ²Pusat Pengajian Teras, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, ¹[email protected]; ²[email protected]; ³[email protected] Abstract-This article discusses the importance of Malaysian the country in facing the challenges of Industrial society in appreciating the symbols of Malaysian nationhood. Revolution 4.0. The symbols of Malaysian nationhood are the country’s Coat of Arms, National Anthems, National Flags, National Flowers 3. Methodology and National Languages. It also discusses the appreciation and preparedness required by Malaysian society in sustaining the survival of Industrial Revolution 4.0. This article is a This study uses a qualitative method by focusing on preliminary study conducted based on reading, observation secondary sources as preliminary findings. A close and views. This study uses library resources. The findings examination is performed on printed materials such as based on the preliminary study indicate that Malaysians still books, articles, journals, brochures, newsletters, have a low level of knowledge and sensitivity to the Malaysian guidelines, and ministry policies. national symbols. 4. Literature Review Keywords-Appreciation, Symbols of Malaysian nationhood, Writings on nation, patriotism and nationalism are often Nationalism, Identity, Industrial Revolution 4.0. discussed by scholars both domestically and abroad. The basic reading of this title can be found in a paper entitled 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws of Malaysia
    Banking and Financial Institutions 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 372 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 2 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 Date of Royal Assent ………… 23 August 1989 Date of publication in the Gazette … 24 August 1989 PREVIOUS REPRINT First Reprint ... ... ... ... ... 2001 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 372 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Functions, powers and duties of Bank PART II LICENSING OF BANKING, FINANCE COMPANY, MERCHANT BANKING, DISCOUNT HOUSE AND MONEY-BROKING BUSINESSES 4. Banking, finance company, merchant banking, discount house and money- broking businesses to be carried on only under licence 5. Submission of application for licence to the Bank 6. Grant or refusal of application by Minister 7. Revocation of licence 8. Imposition of restrictions in lieu of revocation of licence 9. Power to impose new conditions and to vary or revoke conditions imposed on licence under subsection 6(4) or this section 10. Notice of revocation of licence, imposition of restrictions, or variation or revocation of conditions, or imposition of new conditions 11. Mandatory revocation of licence and restriction of licence in cases of emergency 12. Surrender of licence 4 Laws of Malaysia ACT 372 Section 13. Prohibition on carrying on of licensed business upon revocation, expiry of duration, or surrender, of licence 14.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPANIES ACT 1965 Incorporating Latest Amendments Act A1118/2001 First Enacted : 1965 (Act No
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 125 COMPANIES ACT 1965 Incorporating latest amendments Act A1118/2001 First Enacted : 1965 (Act No. 79 of 1965) Revised : 1973 (Act 125 w.e.f. 14 December 1973) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title Section 2. (Omitted) Section 3. Repeals Section 4. Interpretation Section 5. Definition of subsidiary and holding company Section 5A. Definition of ultimate holding company Section 5B. Definition of wholly-owned subsidiary Section 6. When corporations deemed to be related to each other Section 6A.Interests in shares PART II ADMINISTRATION OF ACT Section 7. Registrar of Companies, etc. Section 7A. Power of Minister to exempt from payment of fees Section 7B. Power to conduct inspection Section 7C. Power to conduct investigation Section 7D.PPower to call for examination Section 8. Company auditors and liquidators to be approved by Minister charged with responsibility for finance Section 9. Company auditors Section 10. Disqualification of liquidators Section 11. Registers Section 11A. Electronic filing of documents Section 12. Enforcement of duty to make returns Section 13. Relodging of lost registered documents PART III CONSTITUTION OF COMPANIES DIVISION 1 INCORPORATION Section 14. Formation of companies Section 14A Prohibition of registration of company limited by guarantee with a share capital Section 15. Private company Section 16. Registration and incorporation Section 17. Membership of holding company Section 18. Requirements as to memorandum DIVISION 2 POWERS Section 19. Powers of a company Section 20. Ultra vires transactions Section 21. General provisions as to alteration of memorandum Section 22. Names of companies Section 23. Change of name Section 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Why Friends, Why Friendship Into Poems
    ASIATIC, VOLUME 7, NUMBER 2, DECEMBER 2013 Notes on Why Friends, Why Friendship into Poems Edwin Thumboo1 National University of Singapore Abstract History is especially important in a nation that does not have a long past. For the writer who has to work in cross-cultural terms, the study of English Literature would have stressed the importance of a working history, tapped to provide a sense of context, location and continuity. This is the case with Singapore, which is without a direct historical hinterland. But because it is small, economically strong and politically stable, there is need for the writer to construct missing continuities. This he does by looking not only at the past, but also into the present, its multi-racial, multi-ethnic character. For the present case, friends are both the crystallisation and detailing of this precise historical context, essential for the penetration of both contemporary culture as well as their antecedents. They represent experience as well as repository, a combination that makes them excellent conduits. In the case of Singapore, these cultures mean for the writer specifically the Chinese, Indian, Malay and Eurasian. Keywords Friendship, history, nation-making, linkages, colonialism, cross-cultural creativity Octogenarians who were born, grew up and spent most of their lives at home in Southeast Asia lived, inter alia, through colonialism, war, military occupation, liberation, post-war recovery, the traumas that can follow the first flush of sovereign independence, the mobilisation of nationalism as a constructive force, the search for identity, cross-cultural encounters and an accelerating globalisation. Each would have been close, personal, with some of their forces still unravelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Asian Art and Exhibitions Connectivities and World-Making
    Contemporary Asian Art and Exhibitions Connectivities and World-making Contemporary Asian Art and Exhibitions Connectivities and World-making Michelle Antoinette and Caroline Turner ASIAN STUDIES SERIES MONOGRAPH 6 Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Antoinette, Michelle, author. Title: Contemporary Asian art and exhibitions : connectivities and world-making / Michelle Antoinette and Caroline Turner. ISBN: 9781925021998 (paperback) 9781925022001 (ebook) Subjects: Art, Asian. Art, Modern--21st century. Intercultural communication in art. Exhibitions. Other Authors/Contributors: Turner, Caroline, 1947- author. Dewey Number: 709.5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover illustration: N.S. Harsha, Ambitions and Dreams 2005; cloth pasted on rock, size of each shadow 6 m. Community project designed for TVS School, Tumkur, India. © N.S. Harsha; image courtesy of the artist; photograph: Sachidananda K.J. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2014 ANU Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Introduction Part 1 — Critical Themes, Geopolitical Change and Global Contexts in Contemporary Asian Art . 1 Caroline Turner Introduction Part 2 — Asia Present and Resonant: Themes of Connectivity and World-making in Contemporary Asian Art . 23 Michelle Antoinette 1 . Polytropic Philippine: Intimating the World in Pieces . 47 Patrick D. Flores 2 . The Worlding of the Asian Modern .
    [Show full text]
  • Position and Jurisdictions of Syariah Courtin Malaysia
    International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science Vol. 8 No. 4 April 2020 The administration of Islamic Justice: Position and Jurisdictions of Syariah Courtin Malaysia Ramizah Wan Muhammad Department of Islamic Law, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Published: 29 April 2020 Copyright © Muhammad. Abstract Malaysia operates a dual legal system: Common/Civil law and the Islamic legal system. The common law system is a legacy of British colonialism, 1824-1957. The Shari‘ah based system is Islamic in which Islamic law is implemented in the country. The Supreme law in Malaysia is the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, which was created right after Malaysia gained independence in 1957. The constitution is the supreme law of the land in which all laws created in Malaysia, Islamic or civil law, must conform to the federal constitution. This paper discusses the position and roles of the Syariah Court in Malaysia as an Islamic institution in safeguarding the faith of the Muslims and upholding Islamic law as the basis of justice. The history of Syariah Court as one of the oldest institutions in the legal history in Malaysia is also highlighted so that one could see the original position of the court prior to the colonisation and after the colonisation. It is equally important to look at the jurisdiction of Syariah Courts in Malaysia which is divided into civil and criminal jurisdiction. This information is significant to see the extent of the application of Islamic criminal law in Malaysia, as a modern Muslim state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecri Report on Ukraine
    CRI(2017)38 ECRI REPORT ON UKRAINE (fifth monitoring cycle) Adopted on 20 June 2017 Published on 19 September 2017 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II - Democracy Council of Europe F-67075 STRASBOURG Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0) 3 90 21 46 62 E-mail: [email protected] www.coe.int/ecri ECRI REPORT ON UKRAINE (fifth monitoring cycle) Adopted on 20 June 2017 Published on 19 September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................ 7 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 11 I. COMMON TOPICS ......................................................................................... 11 1. EXISTENCE OF LEGISLATION AGAINST RACISM AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION .. 11 - CRIMINAL LAW ........................................................................................... 11 - CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ................................................................. 12 - NATIONAL SPECIALISED BODIES .................................................................. 13 2. HATE SPEECH ........................................................................................... 14 - DATA ........................................................................................................ 14 - HATE SPEECH IN POLITICAL AND OTHER PUBLIC DISCOURSE ......................... 15 - EXTREMIST
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on MEASURES to COMBAT DISCRIMINATION Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC
    European network of legal experts in the non-discrimination field REPORT ON MEASURES TO COMBAT DISCRIMINATION Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC COUNTRY REPORT 2011 BELGIUM EMMANUELLE BRIBOSIA AND ISABELLE RORIVE State of affairs up to 1st January 2012 This report has been drafted for the European Network of Legal Experts in the Non-discrimination Field (on the grounds of Race or Ethnic Origin, Age, Disability, Religion or Belief and Sexual Orientation), established and managed by: Human European Consultancy Migration Policy Group Maliestraat 7 Rue Belliard 205, Box 1 3581 SH Utrecht 1040 Brussels Netherlands Belgium Tel +31 30 634 14 22 Tel +32 2 230 5930 Fax +31 30 635 21 39 Fax +32 2 280 0925 [email protected] [email protected] www.humanconsultancy.com www.migpolgroup.com All reports are available on the website of the European network of legal experts in the non-discrimination field: http://www.non-discrimination.net/law/national-legislation/country-reports-measures- combat-discrimination This report has been drafted as part of a study into measures to combat discrimination in the EU Member States, funded by the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity – PROGRESS (2007-2013). The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the European Commission. European network of legal experts in the non-discrimination field TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 4 0.1 The national legal system ........................................................................... 4 0.2 Overview/State of implementation .............................................................. 7 0.3 Case-law ................................................................................................... 25 1 GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 79 2 THE DEFINITION OF DISCRIMINATION ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Voice from the Slavic Studies Edge: on Being a Black Woman in the Field Kimberly St
    August 2020 • v. 60, n. 4 NewsNet News of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies A Voice from the Slavic Studies Edge: On Being a Black Woman in the Field Kimberly St. Julian-Varnon, University of Pennsylvania When I sat down to brainstorm what I wanted to say in a In June, the hashtag #BlackintheIvory began trending newsletter that would reach hundreds of ASEEES members, on Twitter. Thousands of Black academics shared their I immediately thought that I had to be careful because I experiences with racism and prejudice, from undergraduate am an incoming doctoral student whose academic career students to tenured faculty. I knew and had shared their is relatively non-existent. I was afraid of the backlash of ordeals. I was not surprised by any of their stories. Instead, being seen as a troublemaker or someone who “plays the I felt relief. I knew it was not just me who felt alienated race card.” My concern represents a more significant issue and alone in an overwhelmingly white field.1 It was a within my chosen field, Soviet/Russian/Ukrainian history, depressing confirmation because it was not better to be and academia. Beyond the ivory tower, the United States Black elsewhere in the academy. is experiencing a pivotal moment. Black people and their My experience in the field is relatively unique. I am one of allies are protesting for justice and the reform of the police a handful of Black people who work on Russian/Soviet/ and other institutions that maintain the status quo of racial Post-Soviet history.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia, Xenophobia and the Climate of Hate
    ISSN 1463 9696 Autumn 2006 • Bulletin No 57 EUROPEAN RACE BULLETIN Islamophobia, xenophobia and the climate of hate “It is not immigration that threatens our culture now, but nascent fascism and neo-Nazism, with the violence and intimidation that are associated with those political creeds.” Daphne Caruana Galizia, Maltese journalist Contents Preface 2 Racial violence 3 Islamophobia and xenophobia 16 National security, anti-terrorist measures and civil rights 26 The IRR is carrying out a European Race Audit supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Specific research projects focus on the impact of national security laws and the war against terrorism on race relations and the impact of the EU’s new policy of ‘managed migration’ on refugee protection. The Institute of Race Relations is precluded from expressing a corporate view: any opinions expressed here are therefore those of the contributors. Please acknowledge IRR’s European Race Audit Project in any use of this work. For further information contact Liz Fekete at the Institute of Race Relations, 2-6 Leeke Street, London WC1X 9HS. Email: [email protected] © Institute of Race Relations 2006 Preface In this issue of the Bulletin, we document around eighty of the most serious incidents of racial violence that have taken place across Europe over the last eleven months. These attacks occurred as the war on terror heightened prejudices against Muslims and foreigners. As Islam has been essentialised (by commentators, politicians and the media) as inherently violent and migration has been depicted as a threat to national security, 'Muslim' has become synonymous with ‘terrorist’, and migrant and foreigner with ‘crime’.
    [Show full text]