The Evolution of Crustacean Mating Systems 31

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Evolution of Crustacean Mating Systems 31 DUFFY_Ch02.qxd 3/4/07 6:09 PM Page 29 The Evolution of Stephen M. Crustacean Mating Shuster Systems The alpha males of the isopod Paracerceis sculpta allow reproductive females (here inside the sponge) to enter their host sponges; beta males and tiny gamma males, which are morphologically identical to females and juveniles, respectively (here seen on the outer sponge surface), attempt to sneak past the 2 alpha male guarding the entrance to copulate with the females within. DUFFY_Ch02.qxd 3/4/07 6:09 PM Page 30 30 conceptual background and context There are two central issues in the study of animal mating systems: (1) the source of sexual selection and (2) the intensity of sexual selection. These issues are important because the approach researchers take to explore them determines (a) the processes that are presumed to cause sexual selection, (b) the procedures that are undertaken to observe these processes, and (c) the variables that are measured in hypothesis testing. The analysis of animal mating systems, until recently, has been based on the hypothesis that sex differences in parental investment are the source of sexual selection (reviewed in Shuster and Wade 2003; see also chapters 7, 9, 12). This emphasis was crystallized by Trivers (1972), who, following discussions by Darwin (1874), Bateman (1948), and Williams (1966), proclaimed, “What governs the operation of sexual selection is the relative parental investment of the sexes in their offspring” (p. 141). Indeed, most studies of mating systems are consistent with parental investment theory (PIT). According to this view, female reproduction is limited by the availability of resources required for parental investment, and because these resources vary in their abundance in space and in time, male reproduction is limited by the spatial distribution of resources and by the temporal distribution of sexually receptive females.To estimate the degree to which these latter distributions influence the inten- sity of selection, Emlen and Oring (1977) defined two measures: the operational sex ratio (OSR) and the environmental potential for polygamy (EPP). The OSR was originally defined by Emlen (1976, p. 283) as “the ratio of potentially receptive males to receptive females at any time.” There have been multiple interpretations of this description, but in its simplest form, OSR ϭ ϭ Ro N4/N5, where N4 and N5 equal the number of males and females, respectively (Shuster and Wade 2003).With OSR Ͼ 1, females are rare and competition for mates is presumed to be intense, although this assumption depends on the degree to which male mating success or failure is consistent among males throughout the breeding season. With OSR Ͻ 1, females are abundant and competition for mates is presum- ably relaxed, although again, depending on the cause of a female-biased sex ratio, such conditions may still allow certain males to contribute disproportionately to the next generation (Shuster and Wade 2003). The EPP measures the degree to which social and ecological conditions allow males to monopolize females. However, appropriate methods for quantifying female distributions, and the scale on which EPP should be measured were never defined. As a result, while serving as a conceptual proxy for the intensity of sexual selection, the uncertain relationship between EPP and selection intensity makes comparisons within and among species imprecise (Shuster and Wade 2003). Researchers emphasizing PIT have encountered further difficulties in putting its assumptions to rigorous empirical tests. Despite Trivers’s (1972) prediction, a sex difference in relative parental investment has proven extremely difficult to compare within and among species. Not only are the relative amounts of energy, cost, and risk associated with relative parental investment difficult to quantify (Strohm and Linsenmair 1999; see also chapters 7–9), but also, the correlation between sex differ- ences in parental investment and sexual dimorphism is dismal, particularly in species with sex role reversal (S.M. Shuster and M.J. Wade, unpublished data). Measures of sexual selection intensity based on PIT require laboratory conditions that are rarely encountered in nature (e.g., potential reproductive rate; Clutton-Brock and Vincent 1991) or make assumptions that underestimate the variance in mating success among DUFFY_Ch02.qxd 3/4/07 6:09 PM Page 31 the evolution of crustacean mating systems 31 individuals (e.g., Q, which focuses on individuals “qualified” to mate; Ahnesjö et al. 2001). Moreover, like other research paradigms grounded in optimality theory (reviewed in Cheverud and Moore 1998), PIT has an unfortunate tendency to empha- size adaptive outcomes, wherein researchers declare to what “should” evolve due to sex differences in parental investment or in expected fitness returns, and then proceed to look for evidence of adaptations consistent with their initial predictions. In this chapter, I explain the utility of a quantitative approach for measuring the source and intensity of sexual selection (see also Shuster and Wade 2003). Using ecological, life history, and behavioral data that are commonly available for sexual species, here, using crustaceans as examples, I show how the magnitude of the sex difference in fitness variance, estimated using measurements of actual male and female fitness, can be used to classify mating systems. I also show how the sex difference in fitness variance is influenced, by the spatial and temporal crowding of receptive females, by female life history, by male and female reproductive behavior, and by runaway processes in various forms. My goal is to suggest an empirical framework for the study of sexual species that measures the selective forces responsible for sex differences in adult phenotype. The Sex Difference in Fitness Variance Most research on sexual selection and its effects on mating systems, including that of Darwin (1874) himself, has focused either on the context in which sexual selection occurs (i.e., via male combat or female choice) or on the evolutionary outcome of sexual selection (i.e., on descriptions of sexual dimorphism or mating behavior). These approaches, while interesting in their own right, consider neither the process nor the degree to which sexual selection may achieve its evolutionary effects. Shuster and Wade (2003) asked, “How can sexual selection be strong enough to counter the combined, opposing forces of male and female viability selection?” (p. 10). This Quantitative Paradox is resolved by measuring the fitness variance for males and females within and among species. This method illustrates when and why sexual selection can be strong enough to overwhelm the effects of natural selection and therefore how it produces the phenotypes its researchers find so compelling. Consider a hypothetical crustacean population consisting of 20 individuals. If each of the 10 females in the population produces a clutch of 10 ova, and if each clutch is fertilized by a single male, then the total number of offspring produced ϭ ϫ ϭ is Nototal (10 ova) (10 females) 100. Because each mating pair produces 10 offspring, the total offspring produced by all females, No5, equals the total offspring ϭ produced by all males, No4 100. Because there are 10 females and 10 males in our ϭ population, the average number of offspring per female, O5 Nototal/N5 is 10, which ϭ equals the average number of offspring per male, O4 Nototal/N4. Also, because each individual produces the same number of offspring (10), no variance in offspring ϭ ϭ numbers exists for either sex. Thus, Vo5 Vo4 0. Separately calculating the mean and variance in offspring numbers for each sex shows how differences in mate numbers between the sexes may influence these parameters. Now consider a case in which 1 of the 10 males secures more than one mate (e.g., 3) as might occur in harpacticoid copepods (Stancyk and Moreira 1988) or in DUFFY_Ch02.qxd 3/4/07 6:09 PM Page 32 32 conceptual background and context cypridinid ostracods (Morin and Cohen 1991). The total offspring produced by our ϭ ϭ ϭ population, Nototal 100, remains unchanged. Similarly, because N4 N5 10, the ϭ ϭ average offspring number per male, O4 Nototal/N4 10, equals the average offspring ϭ ϭ number per female, O5 Nototal/N5 10. Because each female still secures one mate with whom she produces a single brood, the variance in offspring numbers for females, Vo5, is 0. However, because one male has three mates, two males must be excluded from mating. That is, for every k mates obtained by one male, there must be k—1 males who are unable to mate. When this happens, the variance in offspring numbers among males, Vo4, must increase. How can we quantify this increase in fitness variance among males? If paternity data are available, we could simply calculate the statistical variance in offspring numbers for males (Shuster and Wade 1991). Unfortunately, such data can be difficult to obtain (see chapter 9). An alternative approach is to partition the variance in offspring numbers within and among the classes of mating and nonmating males. The data necessary to do this, the mean and variance in mate numbers for males, and the mean and variance in offspring numbers for females, are often available in standard life history analyses. Why should we do this? This approach allows us to measure the fitness variance within each sex, which is proportional to the intensity of selection. Measures of fitness variance provide direct estimates of selection intensity, and the sex difference in selection intensity estimates the degree to which the sexes will diverge in phenotype. We begin by identifying the classes of mating males and their population ϭ frequencies. There are three such classes: males who do not mate, po ( 2/10 ϭ ϭ ϭ males 0.2), males who mate once, p1 ( 7/10 males 0.7), and males who mate ϭ ϭ three times, p3 ( 1/10 males 0.1).
Recommended publications
  • Three New Species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific Islands, with Comments on the Rarity of Bopyrids Parasitizing Brachyurans
    Zootaxa 4851 (1): 151–162 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4851.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B3E81FE-D1DC-4087-B36D-80158A178638 Three new species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific islands, with comments on the rarity of bopyrids parasitizing brachyurans JIANMEI AN1*, WANRUI ZHENG1§, JIELONG LIANG1§ & GUSTAV PAULAY2 1 School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, 041000, P. R. China [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-7327 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6040-5603 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-0412 2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7800, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-9797 *Corresponding author. § These two authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Three new species of the bopyrid genus Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 are described from crabs collected on Pacific Islands: Scyracepon polynesiensis n. sp. from the Society Islands, S. pseudoliomerae n. sp. from the Mariana Islands, and S. biglobosus n. sp. from the Line Islands. The first two were found infesting Xanthias lamarckii and Pseudoliomera sp. (Xanthidae), a new host family for species of Scyracepon, and the last was found parasitizing Schizophrys aspera (Majidae). Scyracepon now includes 11 species, all but one known from single collections, infesting 12 host species in 9 brachyuran families. The discovery of three new species, each rare, suggests that crab parasites are undersampled, and further suggests that the low relative diversity of bopyrids known from brachyurans may partly reflect this undersampling.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp
    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • California “Epicaridean” Isopods Superfamilies Bopyroidea and Cryptoniscoidea (Crustacea, Isopoda, Cymothoida)
    California “Epicaridean” Isopods Superfamilies Bopyroidea and Cryptoniscoidea (Crustacea, Isopoda, Cymothoida) by Timothy D. Stebbins Presented to SCAMIT 13 February 2012 City of San Diego Marine Biology Laboratory Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Division • Public Utilities Department (Revised 1/18/12) California Epicarideans Suborder Cymothoida Subfamily Phyllodurinae Superfamily Bopyroidea Phyllodurus abdominalis Stimpson, 1857 Subfamily Athelginae Family Bopyridae * Anathelges hyphalus (Markham, 1974) Subfamily Pseudioninae Subfamily Hemiarthrinae Aporobopyrus muguensis Shiino, 1964 Hemiarthrus abdominalis (Krøyer, 1840) Aporobopyrus oviformis Shiino, 1934 Unidentified species † Asymmetrione ambodistorta Markham, 1985 Family Dajidae Discomorphus magnifoliatus Markham, 2008 Holophryxus alaskensis Richardson, 1905 Goleathopseudione bilobatus Román-Contreras, 2008 Family Entoniscidae Munidion pleuroncodis Markham, 1975 Portunion conformis Muscatine, 1956 Orthione griffenis Markham, 2004 Superfamily Cryptoniscoidea Pseudione galacanthae Hansen, 1897 Family Cabiropidae Pseudione giardi Calman, 1898 Cabirops montereyensis Sassaman, 1985 Subfamily Bopyrinae Family Cryptoniscidae Bathygyge grandis Hansen, 1897 Faba setosa Nierstrasz & Brender à Brandis, 1930 Bopyrella calmani (Richardson, 1905) Family Hemioniscidae Probopyria sp. A Stebbins, 2011 Hemioniscus balani Buchholz, 1866 Schizobopyrina striata (Nierstrasz & Brender à Brandis, 1929) Subfamily Argeiinae † Unidentified species of Hemiarthrinae infesting Argeia pugettensis
    [Show full text]
  • California Bopyridae T
    California Bopyridae T. D. Stebbins, January 2012 (Crustacea, Isopoda, Cymothoida, Bopyroidea) Subfamily Species Host(s) Range Notes Pseudioninae Aporobopyrus muguensis Porcelain crabs Pachycheles Bodega Bay, northern California Shiino, 1964 holosericus, P. pubescens, and P. to central west Baja California; rudis in California 10-12 m Pseudioninae Aporobopyrus oviformis Porcelain crab Pachycheles Point Mugu, California and Shiino, 1934 pubescens in California Japan; 10-12 m Pseudioninae Asymmetrione ambodistorta Hermit crab Isocheles pilosus Southern California Markham, 1985 Pseudioninae Discomorphus magnifoliatus Porcelain crab Petrolisthes Pacific Grove, Monterey County, Markham, 2008 cinctipes California Pseudioninae Goleathopseudione bilobatus Galatheid crab Munidopsis Central California; 4100 m Because the stem name “Ione” Román-Contreras, 2008 antonii is feminine, so should be “Goleathopseudione.” Thus, the correct species name should be “bilobata” (J. Markham, pers. comm.) Pseudioninae Munidion pleuroncodis Galatheid pelagic red crab Central California to central Markham, 1975 Pleuroncodes planipes Mexico Pseudioninae Orthione griffenis Markham, Mud shrimp Upogebia British Columbia to southern 2004 pugettensis and Upogebia California (Introduced species macginitieorum from Asia: China, Japan) Pseudioninae Pseudione galacanthae Galatheid crabs Galacantha British Columbia to Gulf of Need to confirm: Record from Hansen, 1897 diomediae and Munida California R. Brusca “List of California quadrispina Species” Page 1 California Bopyrid Isopods / T. D. Stebbins (January 2012) Subfamily Species Host(s) Range Notes Pseudioninae Pseudione giardi Calman, 1898 Hermit crabs of the genus Bering Sea to San Juan Islands, Added to SCAMIT Ed. 6 list Pagurus; plus 1 possible record Washington; possibly extended (SCAMIT, 2011) based on trawl record off PV (D. Cadien, pers. infesting the lithodid into California (see Notes) comm.); However, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Variation in Population Structure of the Isopod Urobopyrus Processaerichardson, 1904 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) Infesting
    Nauplius 23(1): 89-103, 2015 89 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-64972015002317 Temporal variation in population structure of the isopod Urobopyrus processae Richardson, 1904 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) infesting the branchial chamber of the night shrimp Ambidexter symmetricus Manning and Chace, 1971 (Decapoda: Processidae) Jennifer A. Rasch and Raymond T. Bauer Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, 70504, USA. E-mail: jennrasch@ gmail.com ABSTRACT - Caridean shrimps are often infested by ectoparasites from the isopod family Bopyridae. Urobopyrus processae is a widespread species of bopyrid parasitizing the branchial (gill) chambers of members of the caridean family Processidae, including Ambidexter symmetricus. We examined hypotheses on differential infestation based on gender, castration of the host by the parasite, correlation between host and parasite size, and the fecundity of female parasites. Infestation rates varied from 1.3 to 32.1% between 2010 and 2011. Infested shrimps ranged from 1.26 mm to 6.24 mm carapace length (CL) between 2010 and 2011. Female shrimps were infested at a higher rate than males (2010 P = 0.0376; 2011 P = 0.0023). We report for the first time the differential selection between left and right branchial chambers in a caridean shrimp by a bopyrid parasite (P = 0.0209). Female parasite total length (TL) increased with host size (CL) in both years of sampling 2 2 (2010 R adj = 0.6863; 2011 R adj = 0.8206). The size of male parasite TL was explained by 2 2 2 both host CL (2010 R adj = 0.4591; 2011 R adj = 0.5490) and parasite female TL (2010 R adj 2 = 0.5606; 2011 R adj = 0.6195).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Leidya Corn Alia and Panceri, 1861, And
    '0 A new species of Leidya and tne first record of Lobocepon A NEW SPECIES OF LEIDYA CORN ALIA AND PANCERI, 1861, AND THE FIRST RECORD OF THE GENUS LOBOCEPON NOBILI, 1905, BOTH FROM THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN, WITH A REVIEW OF THE PARASITES OF GRAPSID CRABS WORLDWIDE (ISOPODA, BOPYRIDAE, IONINAE) John C. Markham Arch Cape Marine Laboratory, Arch Cape, Oregon 97102-0105, USA jmarkham@seasurf. com ABSTRACT typus Duvernoy (1841) from an unknown host on the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius but using an emended Leidya infelix, new species, is described as a spelling of that name. Shortly afterward, Cornalia and parasite of the grapsid crab Pachygrapsus crassipes Panceri (1861) created the new genus Leidya and re- Randall from the west coast of Baja California, Mexico. assigned Leidy's species to it as the type-species, Leidya Another male belonging to the genus Leidya from the distorta, but did not examine any further material or same host and nearly the same locality may belong to add to the original description, which was seriously the same species, but that is not certain. A lone imma- deficient in some crucial details. Despite the common ture female bopyrid assignable to the genus Lobocepon occurrence of Uca pugilator along the carcinologically is recorded as a parasite of Grapsus grapsus (L.) from well-studied Atlantic coast of the United States, for over the Pacific coast of Nicaragua; although probably a rep- a century there were no further published records of resentative of a new species, it was not suitable for de- Leidya distorta. The inadequate description and draw- scription.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Isopoda) Parasites Found in the Eastern Pacific of the United States
    -at AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Charles Garrison Danforth for the Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology (Name) (Degree) 'Major) Date thesis is presented April 12, 1963 ' Title "Bopyridian (Crustacea, __ Isopoda) parasites found in the eastern Pacific, of the United States " Abstract approved Major professor The study of the Epicaridea suborder of the Isopoda on the . west coast of the United States has not been extensive, with the result that there is much to be learned about the distribution, the life histories, and the genera present. In order to attempt an investigation of the Bopyridae in this obscure but interest- ing suborder, it was necessary to review the pertinent litera- ture covering at least the past century, and to determine the status of the eastern Pacific forms in relation to members from the rest of the world. Workers in other nations, notably England, France, India, Italy, Japan, Norway and Russia have written voluminously on the epicarids, and from this the author compiled a listing of the known genera and species comprising the Bopyridae family of the world. Despite similarities in latitude and temperature with bopyrid -rich areas elsewhere, the western United States marine waters seem to support remarkably few parasitic isopeds. It is assumed therefore, that the looped fauna might actually be quite plentiful, and that the apparent paucity is due only to a lack of field work. Collecting was done in Canada, Washington, Oregon, Calif- ornia and Hawaii. In the last locale, a new form (as yet un- named) was obtained. By experimentation carried out in aquaria, it was deter- mined that copepods (particularly Calanus) were the intermediate host of the west coast bopyrid Argeia Dana.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission
    THE DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS OF BEAUFORT, N. C.~ AND THE SURROUNDING REGION By W. P. Hay and C. A. Shore Contribution from the United States Fisheries Biological Station. Beaufort. N. C. Blank page retained for pagination THE DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS OF BEAUFORT, N. C., AND THE SURROUNDING REGION. By W. P.RAY and C. A. SHORE. Contribution from the United States Fisheries Biological Station. Beaufort, N. C. ,;f­ INTRODUCTION. The following report on the decapod crustaceans of the region surrounding Beaufort, N. C., was begun by the junior author in 1904, while a student in the University of North Carolina, and was worked on actively for three years. During that time the crustacean material which had accumulated at the United States fisheries laboratory was studied and identified, much collecting was done and descriptions of most of the species known to occur in the region were prepared for publication. An extensive series of photo­ graphs was also made for the purpose of illustrating the paper. At this point other duties intervened and made it necessary to permanentlyabandon all hope of completing the report. In 1912 the senior author took up the work. It was hoped at first to bring the paper to an early conclusion, but it soon became evident that several seasons' work would be required to produce a satisfactory result. The nomenclature and synonymy of the species already described had to be brought up to date, the rather extensive coIIections of five or six years had to be worked over, and numerous additional descrip­ tions and photographs had to be prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key to the Epicaridean Isopods of the South Atlantic Bight
    AA KKeeyy ttoo tthhee EEppiiccaarriiddeeaann IIssooppooddss ooff tthhee SSoouutthh AAttllaannttiicc BBiigghhtt Jana N. Thoma and Richard W. Heard Thirty species of the isopod suborder Epicaridea Latreille, 1831, a diverse group of parasites occurring on various crustacean hosts, are known from the South Atlantic Bight (SAB) between Cape Lookout, North Carolina, and Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA. Illustrated keys to those species are provided here. Images modified from Markham, 1988 & 1985; Wells & Wells, 1966; Markham, 1978 & 1985; Boyko & Williams, 2003 (left to right, top to bottom) Preprint of the key from Thoma & Heard (in prep..) for the NOAA Professional Papers Series (layout prepared by the Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center for online use) Index Table of species in the South Atlantic Bight ..................................................... 3 Overview of general bopyrid morphology ........................................................ 4 Key to families of the suborder Epicaridea (adult females) .............................. 5 Key to the Bopyridae (adult females) .......................................................... 6 Key to Bopyrinae (adult females) .......................................................... 7 Key to Bopyrinae (adult males) ............................................................. 8 Key to species of Probopyrinella (adult females) ..................... 9 Key to species of Probopyrinella (adult males) ........................ 9 Key to species of Synsynella (adult females) .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.First Report of the Parasite Crustacean Leidya Distorta (Isopoda
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Romero-Rodríguez, Jesús; Guillén-Hernández, Sergio; Simões, Nuno First report of the parasite crustacean Leidya distorta (Isopoda: Bopyridae) on the fiddler crab Uca spinicarpa (Decapoda: Brachyura) in Yucatán coasts, Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 88, núm. 2, junio, 2017, pp. 459-463 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42551127023 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88 (2017) 459–463 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Research note First report of the parasite crustacean Leidya distorta (Isopoda: Bopyridae) on the fiddler crab Uca spinicarpa (Decapoda: Brachyura) in Yucatán coasts, Mexico Primer reporte del crustáceo parásito Leidya distorta (Isopoda: Bopyridae) en el cangrejo Uca spinicarpa (Decapoda: Brachyura) en las costas de Yucatán, México a a,∗ b Jesús Romero-Rodríguez , Sergio Guillén-Hernández , Nuno Simões a Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Km 15.5 carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil, Apartado postal 4-116, 97000 Itzimná, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico b Programa de Biodiversidad Marina de Yucatán (BDMY), Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigacio´ın (UMDI-Sisal), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Puerto de Abrigo s/n, 97356 Sisal, Yucatán, Mexico Received 14 February 2016; accepted 4 November 2016 Available online 3 May 2017 Abstract Parasitic isopods, particularly members of the Bopyridae that infest crustacean hosts, have received scant study in many geographic regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographia Bopyridarum Prepared and Maintained by John Markham
    Bibliographia Bopyridarum Prepared and maintained by John Markham, Arch Cape, Oregon, USA. Any reports of errors or omissions greatly appreciated; please contact [email protected] Abed-Navandi, D., & P. C. Dworschak, 1997. First record of the thalassinid Callianassa truncata Giard &- Bonnier, 1890 in the Adriatic Sea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Callianassidae). Annalen des naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 99B: 565-570. Abele, L. G., 1972. A review of the genus Ambidexter (Crustacea: Decapoda: Processidae) in Panama. Bulletin of Marine Science 22: 365-380. Abele, L. G., & W. Kim, 1989. The Decapod Crustaceans of the Panama Canal. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 482: i-iv, 1- 50. Abu-Hakima, R., 1984. Preliminary observations on the effects of Epipenaeon elegans Chopra (Isopoda: Bopyridae) on reproduction of Penaeus semisulcatus de Haan (Decapoda: Penaeidae). International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 7 (1): 61-62. Adams, J., 1960. A contribution to the biology and post larval development of the Sargassum fish, Histrio histrio (Linnaeus), with a discussion of the Sargassum complex. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 10: 55-82. Adams, M. J., 2008. Intertidal organisms EZ-ID guides. Orthione griffenis (Griffen’s isopod). www.beachwatchers.wsu.edu/ezidweb/animals/Orthionegriffenis.htm n. p. Adema, H., 1980. De heremietkreeft (Pagurus bernhardus Linne, 1758) en haar parasieten. Het Zeepard 40 (2): 32-35. Adema, J. P. H. M., 1981. Ione thoracica (Montagu,1808) (Isopoda, Bopyridae) alweer een nieuwe pissebed in nederlanse wateren. Het Zeepard 41 (3): 61-62. Adema, J. P. H. M., 1991. De krabben van Nederland en België (Crustacea. Decapoda, Brachyura). Leiden: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum.
    [Show full text]