DOCSLIB.ORG

(Ochlerotatus) Camptorhynchus in Napier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Ochlerotatus) Camptorhynchus in Napier An integrated response to the In December 1998, the southern saltmarsh mosquito, establishment of the exotic Aedes camptorhynchus, was identified for the first time in New Zealand and an established population mosquito Aedes (Ochlerotatus) confirmed at Napier. Nationwide surveillance has camptorhynchus in Napier detected larvae at other sites on the east coast of the North Island and in Northland. Eradication has been The southern saltmarsh mosquito, Aedes (Ochlerotatus) successful at Napier, and has commenced camptorhynchus, is an aggressive biting mosquito and therefore a at the other east coast sites. A treatment significant public nuisance. In Australia it is a vector of three programme has commenced in pathogenic alphaviruses: Ross River virus(1), Barmah Forest virus(2) and Sindbis (Okelbo) virus. It has also been found carrying the Northland to contain, but not eradicate, flaviviruses Kokobera virus(3) and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. the mosquito. Ross River virus causes a significant, non-fatal but potentially Graham Mackereth, Co-author chronic and relapsing disease in humans(4), and its vertebrate host range also includes marsupials(5), dogs, horses, cattle, pigs and Eradication fruit bats(6). S-methoprene, which prevents the emergence of adult mosquitoes In 1999, after its detection at Napier, a serological survey of from the pupae, was the principal method used to eradicate the 353 animals, including horses, cattle and possums living near the mosquitoes at Napier. S-methoprene granules were applied by air at mosquito infested area, found no antibody to alphavirus or 6 kg per hectare, and pellets were used in deeper drains. Because flavivirus(7). The Ministry of Health surveyed 53 mosquito-bitten eggs can survive for long periods, a chemical with prolonged people from the Hawke’s Bay region for antibody to Ross River activity was required. S-methoprene was chosen because it is virus, and re-tested 20 later to detect any subsequent released slowly from granules and pellets. Effective residual levels of seroconversion. There is no evidence that the exotic mosquito active ingredient were maintained for a 20-month period by introduced any pathogenic viruses. application of granules every 21 days, and every 30 days for the pellets. Sites subject to variable water levels were monitored to In the presence of an established southern saltmarsh mosquito ensure that residual S-methoprene levels were maintained, and that population, one viraemic person bitten by a mosquito could result dry areas were not over-dosed. in an epidemic of Ross River virus, as is thought to have occurred in Fiji from a viraemic traveller(8). Failure to control the mosquito in The bacterial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis var israeliensis (Bti) New Zealand could eventually result in Ross River virus becoming was used for initial containment. In the eradication programme, endemic, with recurring epidemics of disease. ground teams applied it in situations where small-scale hand-held spray-pack applications were required. The route of entry of the mosquito into New Zealand is not known. It may have resulted from windborne dispersal from coastal Where possible, potential habitat was modified to make it Australian habitats, been introduced in the cabin or cargo space of unsuitable for larval development by filling depressions, clearing an international aircraft, or in association with soft-top container- blocked or ponded drainage channels, and maintaining water levels loaded ships and live sheep ships from Australia. in other channels. Habitat modification and Bti were used on an organic farm as an alternative to S-methoprene. Response The Ministry of Health managed the Napier mosquito incursion Ecological monitoring with advice from a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) and invited Several non-target aquatic species, including damsel flies, experts. The field response was managed by Healthcare Hawke’s Bay chironomids, mysids, seed shrimps and trout, were tested for at a Mosquito Response Centre in Napier. The main components of susceptibility to S-methoprene. Acute mortality tests were carried the response were mosquito surveillance and mosquito eradication. out using the standard field dose and 10 times the field dose. The standard dose caused no mortality in the monitored non-target The life cycle of Ae camptorhynchus is not completely described(9). species(10). Chironomids were susceptible at 10 times the standard The eggs, which are laid on moist mud above the water level, are dose, which was expected as S-methoprene is used overseas to resistant and survive desiccation for a long period. Flooding triggers control chironomids(11). Chironomids are present only in fringe the eggs to hatch. Larvae have been found in fresh (in Australia), areas of habitat in Hawke’s Bay(10). brackish and salt water. There are four larval instars before the pupal stage. Development from eggs to adults can occur in two to An expert review committee, which met in Napier to review eight weeks. When adults emerge from pupae they fly to find eradication progress in February 2000, concluded that since the shelter in vegetation, which can be some distance (5-8 km) from start of the programme there had been a 99.96% reduction in the breeding sites. adult saltmarsh mosquito population. Larval populations showed a page 14 Surveillance 28(3) 2001 during routine surveillance at Muriwai, south of Gisborne. Intensive surveillance was undertaken of the east coast from Wellington to Hick’s Bay. In October 2000, further infestation was found at the Wherowhero lagoon 20 km south of Gisborne and at a small site at Sponge Bay just north of Gisborne. An infested site was identified at the Maungawhio Lagoon, Mahia and 80 km south of Napier at Porangahau. Nationwide surveillance detected the mosquito at Kaipara in February 2001 and Mangawai in April 2001. The map shows the known locations of the mosquito. Eradication measures at Napier, Gisborne, Mahia and Porangahau are continuing. Containment and control has commenced at Kaipara and Mangawhai. Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge Sally Gilbert and Andrew Kilometres Forsyth, Ministry of Health, Steve Garner, Healthcare Hawke’s Bay, and Bryn Gradwell, Southern Monitoring Services. Location and date of detection of Aedes camptorhynchus as at April 2001. References similar decline in both numbers and positive sites. Adult and larval (1) Ballard JWO, Marshall ID. An investigation of the potential of Aedes camptorhynchus (Thom.) as a vector of Ross River virus. Australian Journal of numbers dropped rapidly in the first five months of the Experimental Biology and Medical Science 64,197-200, 1986. programme. Flooding 10 months into the programme resulted in (2) Lindsay MD, Johansen CA, Smith DW, Wallace MJ, Mackenzie JS. An outbreak of Barmah Forest virus disease in the south-west of Western Australia. the hatching of eggs (presumably on higher ground than Medical Journal of Australia 162, 291-4, 1995. previously) and a small increase in trapped adults and larvae that (3) Russell RC. Vectors vs. Humans in Australia – Who is on top down under? An month. The last adults were detected in April 2000, and the last update on the vector-borne disease and research in Australia. Journal of Vector Ecology 23,1-46, 1998. larvae in July 2000. (4) Boughton CR. Australian Arboviruses of Medical Importance. A Handbook for General Practitioners and Other Clinicians. Royal Australian College of General Surveillance Practitioners Services, Melbourne, 1996. (5) Azuolas JK. Arboviral diseases of horses and possums. Arbovirus Research in Surveillance was used to delimit the extent of the incursion and Australia 7, 5-7,1997. evaluate the success of eradication. Surveillance for exotic (6) Kay BH, Aaskov JG. Ross River virus (epidemic polyarthritis). In: Monath TP mosquitoes had previously focused on detecting freshwater (ed). The Arboviruses: Epidemiology and Ecology, Vol IV, pp 93-112. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1989. (12) container-breeding species at major seaports and airports . (7) Mackereth G. A survey for arbovirus infection in New Zealand livestock Nationwide surveillance for the southern saltmarsh mosquito was exposed to the exotic mosquito Aedes camptorhychus. Surveillance 26(4), 10-1,1999. undertaken by the regional public health services. Landcare (8) Marshall ID, Miles AR. Ross river virus and epidemic polyarthritis. Current Research NZ Ltd identified 619 zones with habitat suitable for the Topics in Vector Research 2, 31-56, 1984. saltmarsh mosquito, involving a total area of 86,900 hectares. (9) Noiton D, Brady H, Shulmeister J. Southern Saltmarsh mosquito literature review on the mosquito ecology and the transmission of Ross River Virus. A further 356 zones were identified as having evidence of some A report for the New Zealand Ministry of Health. August 2000. suitable habitat. Zones for which there is evidence of suitable (10) Browne GN, Taylor JF, Dunford PR. Acute Mortality of Non Target Organisms Exposed to S-methoprene (Prolink XR-G). Journal of American Mosquito habitat within 5 km of an airport or port exist at Kaitaia, Control Association (in press). Whangarei, Auckland, Whitianga, Tauranga, Gisborne, Napier, (11) Lothrop BB, Mulla MS. Field evaluation of controlled release pellet formulation Paraparaumu, Hokitika and Invercargill. of Methoprene against chironomid midges in man made lakes. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 14(3), 335-9, 1998. Detailed ground surveys were required to delimit suitable habitat, (12) Kay BH. Review of New Zealand Programme for Exclusion and Surveillance of Exotic Mosquitoes of Public Health Significance. Report to the Ministry of which can change depending on factors such as rainfall, tidal Health, Wellington, 1997. changes, irrigation systems and ground water levels. (13) Anon. Surveillance for the Southern Saltmarsh Mosquito. Guidelines for Public Health Services. Ministry of Health, 1999. Surveillance sampling methods include the trapping of adult G F Mackereth mosquitoes in light traps and dipping for larval mosquitoes in National Centre for Disease Investigation ponds(13), although the sensitivity of these methods has not been Email: [email protected] quantified.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Human Health: Risks and Responses
    Climate change and human health RISKS AND RESPONSES Editors A.J. McMichael The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia D.H. Campbell-Lendrum London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom C.F. Corvalán World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland K.L. Ebi World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, European Centre for Environment and Health, Rome, Italy A.K. Githeko Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya J.D. Scheraga US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA A. Woodward University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 2003 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Climate change and human health : risks and responses / editors : A. J. McMichael . [et al.] 1.Climate 2.Greenhouse effect 3.Natural disasters 4.Disease transmission 5.Ultraviolet rays—adverse effects 6.Risk assessment I.McMichael, Anthony J. ISBN 92 4 156248 X (NLM classification: WA 30) ©World Health Organization 2003 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dis- semination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution—should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Doh Multi-Page Template
    Medical Entomology 2016/2017 Annual Report Environmental Health Hazards Unit Environmental Health Directorate Public Health Division Department of Health, Western Australia PO Box 8172, Perth Business Centre Perth, 6849 Acknowledgements The extensive and diverse work program undertaken by the Department of Health’s Medical Entomology team outlined in this Annual Report could not have been completed without significant assistance and collaboration from many partners and stakeholders. In particular, the Medical Entomology team wishes to thank the Department of Health for its ongoing support in regards to this important public health program including: o the Environmental Health Directorate; o the Communicable Disease Control Directorate; o Population Health Units/Area Health Services o PathWest; and o Communications Directorate. The Pathwest laboratory continued to have a significant involvement in the program through provision of laboratory services for key components of the surveillance program for detection of arboviruses of public health significance to the State. We also acknowledge and thank the Population Health Units and the Western Australian Country Health Service for their role in reporting and follow-up of human cases of disease, and especially the role of Local Governments in the management of mosquitoes and the diseases they transmit. These organisations play an active role in the provision of data, case follow up investigations, care and bleeding of chickens for the sentinel chicken program, trapping of mosquitoes, mosquito control treatments and advice to the Western Australian community about disease risk through the media. In particular we thank Environmental Health Officers from the 139 Local Governments across WA, especially those within Contiguous Local Authority Groups (CLAGs), who respond to public complaints, undertake larval and adult mosquito surveys, and undertake mosquito control activities as part of their complex, integrated programs to manage the risks to public health and amenity within their regions.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: a Review
    viruses Review Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: A Review Oselyne T. W. Ong 1,2 , Eloise B. Skinner 3,4 , Brian J. Johnson 2 and Julie M. Old 5,* 1 Children’s Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; [email protected] 2 Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] 3 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; [email protected] 4 Biology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mosquito-borne viruses are well recognized as a global public health burden amongst humans, but the effects on non-human vertebrates is rarely reported. Australia, houses a number of endemic mosquito-borne viruses, such as Ross River virus, Barmah Forest virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. In this review, we synthesize the current state of mosquito-borne viruses impacting non-human vertebrates in Australia, including diseases that could be introduced due to local mosquito distribution. Given the unique island biogeography of Australia and the endemism of vertebrate species (including macropods and monotremes), Australia is highly susceptible to foreign mosquito species becoming established, and mosquito-borne viruses becoming endemic alongside novel reservoirs. For each virus, we summarize the known geographic distribution, mosquito vectors, vertebrate hosts, clinical signs and treatments, and highlight the importance of including non-human vertebrates in the assessment of future disease outbreaks. The mosquito-borne viruses discussed can impact wildlife, livestock, and companion animals, causing significant changes to Australian Citation: Ong, O.T.W.; Skinner, E.B.; ecology and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil, Food Security and Human Health: a Review
    European Journal of Soil Science, March 2015, 66, 257–276 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12216 Invited Review Soil, food security and human health: a review M. A. Olivera & P. J. Gregoryb,c aDepartment of Geography & Environmental Science, School of Human & Environmental Sciences, Soil Research Centre, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 233, Reading RG6 6DW, UK, bEast Malling Research, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK, and cCentre for Food Security, School of Agriculture, Policy & Development, The University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK Summary Direct effects of soil or its constituents on human health are through its ingestion, inhalation or absorption. The soil contains many infectious organisms that may enter the human body through these pathways, but it also provides organisms on which our earliest antibiotics are based. Indirect effects of soil arise from the quantity and quality of food that humans consume. Trace elements can have both beneficial and toxic effects on humans, especially where the range for optimal intake is narrow. We focus on four trace elements (iodine, iron, selenium and zinc) whose deficiencies have substantial effects on human health. As the world’s population increases issues of food security become more pressing, as does the need to sustain soil fertility and minimize its degradation. Lack of adequate food and food of poor nutritional quality lead to differing degrees of under-nutrition, which in turn causes ill health. Soil and land are finite resources and agricultural land is under severe competition from other uses. Relationships between soil and health are often difficult to extricate because of the many confounding factors present.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN SALTMARSH MOSQUITO 1. Description of The
    SOUTHERN SALTMARSH MOSQUITO 1. Description of the problem (a) Location of the case study East coast of the North Island of New Zealand, from Hawke’s Bay north to East Cape. (b) History (origin, pathway and dates, including time-period between initial entry/first detection of alien species and development of impacts) of introduction(s) Southern saltmarsh mosquitoes were first discovered in New Zealand in December 1998. It is not known how they arrived but possible pathways include by sea via the Port of Napier, possibly in soft-top containers, tyre imports or live- sheep ships returning from Australia. Mosquitoes were most likely present for more than one breeding season before discovery in 1998. From the initial site near Napier, three other populations have now been discovered, the most recent in November 2000. The mosquitoes were thought to be spreading by hitch-hiking on planes and ship containers, but the most recent find is near a town with no international airport or port, although fishing vessels, pleasure craft and top-dressing or other small aircraft will be present. Almost immediately after the mosquito was identified (on 25 December 1998) a response centre was set up. Spraying of Bacillus thuringiensis israeliensis (Bti) to contain the mosquito began one month later (21 January 1999). (Bti is a biological spray specific to mosquito, blackfly and gnat larvae). A health risk assessment was finalised in February and an eradication plan begun in August of that year. (c) Description of the alien species concerned: biology of the alien species (the scientific name of species should be indicated if possible) and ecology of the invasion(s) (type of and potential or actual impacts on biological diversity and ecosystem(s) invaded or threatened, and stakeholders involved) The southern saltmarsh mosquito, Aedes camptorhynchus, is believed to have come to New Zealand from Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eradication of Invading Insect Populations: from Concepts to Applications Andrew M
    EN61CH18-Liebhold ARI 1 February 2016 13:2 Eradication of Invading Insect ANNUAL Populations: From Concepts REVIEWS Further Click here to view this article's online features: to Applications • Download figures as PPT slides • Navigate linked references • Download citations • Explore related articles 1,∗ 2 • Search keywords Andrew M. Liebhold, Ludek Berec, Eckehard G. Brockerhoff,3 Rebecca S. Epanchin-Niell,4 Alan Hastings,5 Daniel A. Herms,6 John M. Kean,7 Deborah G. McCullough,8 David M. Suckling,9 Patrick C. Tobin,10 and Takehiko Yamanaka11 1US Forest Service Northern Research Station, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505; email: [email protected], [email protected] 2Biology Center of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 Ceskˇ e´ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic; email: [email protected] 3Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute), Christchurch 8540, New Zealand; email: [email protected] 4Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036; email: [email protected] 5Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California 95616; email: [email protected] 6Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691; email: [email protected] 7AgResearch Limited, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand; email: [email protected] 8Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; email: [email protected] 9New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research and University of Auckland, Christchurch 4704, New Zealand; email: [email protected] 10School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195; email: [email protected] 11Natural Resources Inventory Center, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan; email: [email protected] Annu.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Source of Blood Meals in Mosquitoes Collected From
    Gyawali et al. Parasites Vectors (2019) 12:198 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3455-2 Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Identifcation of the source of blood meals in mosquitoes collected from north-eastern Australia Narayan Gyawali1,2,3*, Andrew W. Taylor‑Robinson4, Richard S. Bradbury1, David W. Huggins5, Leon E. Hugo3, Kym Lowry2 and John G. Aaskov2 Abstract Background: More than 70 arboviruses have been identifed in Australia and the transmission cycles of most are poorly understood. While there is an extensive list of arthropods from which these viruses have been recovered, far less is known about the non‑human hosts that may be involved in the transmission cycles of these viruses and the relative roles of diferent mosquito species in cycles of transmission involving diferent hosts. Some of the highest rates of human infection with zoonotic arboviruses, such as Ross River (RRV) and Barmah Forest (BFV) viruses, occur in coastal regions of north‑eastern Australia. Methods: Engorged mosquitoes collected as a part of routine surveillance using CO 2‑baited light traps in the Rock‑ hampton Region and the adjoining Shire of Livingstone in central Queensland, north‑eastern Australia, were ana‑ lysed for the source of their blood meal. A 457 or 623 nucleotide region of the cytochrome b gene in the blood was amplifed by PCR and the amplicons sequenced. The origin of the blood was identifed by comparing the sequences obtained with those in GenBank®. Results: The most common hosts for the mosquitoes sampled were domestic cattle (26/54) and wild birds (14/54). Humans (2/54) were an infrequent host for this range of mosquitoes that are known to transmit arboviruses causing human disease, and in an area where infections with human pathogens like RRV and BFV are commonly recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • I MODELLING the DEMOGRAPHY and CONTROL of DISEASE
    MODELLING THE DEMOGRAPHY AND CONTROL OF DISEASE-CARRYING TROPICAL MOSQUITOES IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA By Siobhan Clare de Little A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Adelaide October 2011 i ii Statement of Originality I, Siobhan Clare de Little certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below*) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. *DE LITTLE, S. C., BOWMAN, D. M. J. S., WHELAN P. I., BROOK, B. W. & BRADSHAW, C. J. A. 2009. Quantifying the drivers of larval density patterns in two tropical mosquito species to maximize control efficiency. Environmental Entomology, 38:4, 1013-1021.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.06 Managing Mosquitoes in Coastal Wetlands
    Chapter 3.6 — Managing mosquitoes in coastal wetlands • 321 3.6 Managing mosquitoes in coastal wetlands Dr Cameron Webb1,2 1University of Sydney & Pathology West - ICPMR Westmead, Westmead, Australia 2Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Level 3 ICPMR, Westmead Hospital NSW 2145 Australia Abstract The mosquitoes associated with estuarine wetlands represent some of the most important pest species in Australia. The saltmarsh mosquito, Aedes vigilax, and the southern saltmarsh mosquito, Aedes camptorhynchus, are both adapted to estuarine conditions and are often exceptionally abundant during periods of favourable environmental conditions. In those regions where abundant populations occur, these species play a locally significant role in the transmission of disease-causing pathogens, in particular Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus. A range of strategies are available to manage the risks associated with these estuarine mosquitoes. These may include the use of control agents targeting the aquatic immature mosquitoes and/ or habitat modifications that reduce the suitability of estuarine habitats. Local authorities must remain mindful of these strategies as an increased abundance of mosquitoes in association with wetland construction and rehabilitation projects may be a concern. While the ecological importance of these estuarine mosquitoes has not been fully demonstrated, any mosquito management program must consider the indirect impacts of mosquito population suppression, particularly on insectivorous vertebrates that may utilise mosquitoes as a food supply. Mosquitoes are a natural part of estuarine wetlands and living with the risks associated with mosquito-borne disease requires balance between reducing the nuisance-biting and public health risks while minimising any adverse environmental or ecological impact of mosquito management activities.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT Zz Zz
    What Type of Mosquito z Avoid Being Bitten z y GENERAL REPELLENT GUIDELINES y z Avoid Being Bitten z y WHAT ABOUT MY PETS? y zzMOSQUITO zz y is Annoying You? y Prevention of mosquito bites is your first line of Insect repellent containing diethyltoluamide (DEET) or There are a number of other things you can do In addition to transmitting diseases to people, There are almost 100 different species of mosquito defence against mosquito-borne disease. picaridin are the most effective. As a general rule, the to help avoid being affected by mosquitoes: mosquitoes are also responsible for the transmission MANAGEMENT y in WA. The four main disease carrying mosquitoes found greater the percentage of DEET or picaridin, the longer Recognise and avoid areas of mosquito activity of heartworm in pets. Heartworm can affect dogs and in the Cockburn and Kwinana region are described the product will remain effective. e.g. swamps, salt marshes, billabongs and river cats, although infection is more common in dogs. below. Can you identify the mosquito biting you? z COVER Up. REPEL. CLEAN UP. z floodplains particularly around sunrise Symptoms include coughing, fatique, weightloss, y Always follow instructions on the label. IN COCKBURN AND KWINANA and sunset. listlessness and a rough hair coat. In severe cases, y Choose a repellent with an appropriate y heartworm can be fatal. Southern Saltmarsh Mosquito: Aedes camptorhynchus Many mosquitoes are at their biting best around dusk Plan outdoor activities. If you are hosting an This species is prevalent in the Cockburn concentration of DEET or picaridin to match the outdoor BBQ have repellent available for your The risk of heartworm infection can be lowered by and dawn, but some will bite day and night.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation of a Core Virome in Aedes Mosquitoes Across Different
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.058701; this version posted April 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 The conservation of a core virome in Aedes 2 mosquitoes across different developmental stages 3 and continents 4 5 Chenyan Shi1,#, Lu Zhao2,3,#, Evans Atoni2,3, Weifeng Zeng4, Xiaomin Hu5, Jelle Matthijnssens1, 6 Zhiming Yuan2,3,*, Han Xia2,3,* 7 8 1. KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of 9 Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Laboratory of Viral Metagenomics, Leuven, Belgium 10 2. Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of 11 Sciences, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China 12 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China 13 4. Liwan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510176, Guangdong, China 14 5. College of Life Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China 15 16 17 18 # These authors contributed equally to this work. 19 *Correspondence: Zhiming Yuan (Email: [email protected]) and Han Xia (Email: [email protected]) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.058701; this version posted April 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 32 Abstract 33 Mosquitoes belonging to the genus Aedes can efficiently transmit many pathogenic 34 arboviruses, placing a great burden on public health worldwide.
    [Show full text]