Rebuilding Northern Uganda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey 2019-19 [MIS34]
UGANDA 2018-19 UGANDA UGANDA Malaria Indicator Survey Malaria Indicator Survey 2018-19 GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey 2018-19 Ministry of Health National Malaria Control Division Kampala, Uganda Uganda Bureau of Statistics Kampala, Uganda The DHS Program ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA March 2020 The 2018-19 Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey (2018-19 UMIS) was implemented by the National Malaria Control Division (NMCD) and the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Financial support for the survey was provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI), by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID), by the World Health Organization (WHO), and by the Government of Uganda with Global Fund support. ICF provided technical assistance through The DHS Program, a USAID-funded project offering support and technical assistance in the implementation of population and health surveys in countries worldwide. Additional information about the 2018-19 UMIS may be obtained from the National Malaria Control Division, Plot 6, Lourdes Rd., Wandegeya, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda. Information about The DHS Program may be obtained from ICF, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; telephone: +1-301-407-6500; fax: +1-301-407-6501; email: [email protected]; internet: www.DHSprogram.com. Recommended citation: Uganda National Malaria Control Division (NMCD), Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), and ICF. 2020. Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey -
Lands, Housing and Urban Development VOTE 012 &
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Ministerial Policy Statement For Lands, Housing and Urban Development VOTE 012 & 156 FY 2009/10 Presented to Parliament of the Republic of Uganda for the debate of the Estimates of Revenue and Expenditures By Daniel Omara Atubo (MP) MINISTER OF LANDS, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT th 30 June 2009 Table of Contents PRELIMINARY ........................................................................................................... 2 Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 2 Abbreviations and Acronyms....……………………………………...………...................3 Structure of the Report……………………………………………………….....................4 Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION A: MINISTRY AND VOTE OVERVIEW .................................................. 8 Vote: 012 Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development ....................................... 8 Vote: 156 Uganda Land Commission ............................................................................... 25 SECTION B: PAST PERFORMANCE AND FUTURE PLANS BY VOTE FUNCTION…………………………………………………………….32 Vote: 012 Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development................................32 Vote Function: 0201 Land Administration and Management .......................................... 32 Vote Function: 0202 Physical Planning and Urban Development .................................. -
Policing Politicians
Working paper Policing Politicians Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda - Preliminary Analysis Macartan Humphreys Jeremy M. Weinstein March 2012 Policing Politicians: Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda Preliminary Analysis Macartan Humphreys⇤ Jeremy M. Weinstein Columbia University Stanford University March 1, 2012 Abstract Identifying the conditions under which politicians are responsive to citizens’ needs and preferences is a central concern in the study of political economy. Does greater trans- parency improve political accountability? We use a simple model of political account- ability to derive a set of hypotheses linking access to information to political behavior and provide results from a multi-level field experiment designed to test these hypotheses in the context of parliamentary behavior in Uganda. Between 2006 and 2011, working with a Ugandan partner, we developed a scorecard with detailed information on the be- havior of Ugandan Members of Parliament (MPs), informed a randomly selected sample of MPs that the information would be disseminated in their constituencies, and provided voters with information about their MP’s performance through a variety of dissemina- tion channels. Evidence from survey experiments indicate that Ugandan voters are strongly receptive to new information about the performance of their MPs. Evidence from the dissemination campaigns, however, provides no evidence that MPs respond to a higher level of transparency or that their prospects for reelection are threatened by it. ⇤We thank our partners in the field at the Africa Leadership Institute; the Democratic Development Programme, International Growth Centre, and Innovations in Poverty Action for support for data collection; and the Trudeau Foundation for support during the analysis phase. -
Uganda Date: 30 October 2008
Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke. -
Program of the 4Th Scientific Conference
Makerere University College of Health Sciences Program for the 7th Annual Scientific Conference 20th – 22nd September 2011; Speke Resort Munyonyo Kampala, Uganda 20th SEPTEMBER 2011 Abstract No. Time Presentation 8.00-8.30 Arrival and registration PLENARY Chair: Dr Rhoda Wanyenze; Co-Chair: Dr. Freddie Bwanga 8.30 - 9.00 Key note address – All for Health – One Health: Dr. Jane Aceng Director General MOH PLENARY Health Systems, Health Policy & Healthcare Chair: Prof Fredrick Wabwire-Mangen; Co-Chair: Prof. David Guwatudde PP1001_20 9.00-9.10 Health Systems, Governance and Health Outcome: Dr. Freddie Ssengoba PP1002_20 9.10-9.20 Challenges and Future Systems in Uganda to Ensure Delivery of Quality Care: Dr. Robert Basaza PP1003_20 9.20-9.30 Transforming Education to Strengthen Health Systems in an Inter-department World: Prof. David Serwadda 9.30-9:40 DISCUSSION PP1004_20 9:40-9:50 Role of Cultural Institutions in Healthcare Delivery, Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Dr. Nelson Kawalya PP1005_20 9:50-10:00 Impact of Private for Profit Institutions in Healthcare Delivery and Health Systems Strengthening: Dr. Ian Clarke PP1006_20 10:00-10:10 HIV/AIDS programming through District based technical assistance programme: Experience from STAR-EC: Dr. Samson Kironde 10:10-10:20 DISCUSSION 10:20-10:50 TEA BREAK OFFICIAL OPENING CEREMONY: MC – Prof. Harriet Mayanja; Co-MC: Mr. Gerald Makumbi 10:50-10.55 Welcome remarks by Chair, 7ASC Organising Committee MakCHS: Dr. Freddie Bwanga 10.55-11.10 Announcement of the Bill & Melinda Gates Research Grant for Africa: Dr. Wong 11.10-11.10 Remarks on Translating Research into Policy and Healthcare Delivery by Chair, Research College of Health Sciences Makerere University: Prof. -
Page 1 of 76 Uganda 03/10/2004
Uganda Page 1 of 76 THE SCARS OF DEATH Children Abducted by the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda Human Rights Watch / Africa Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project Human Rights Watch New York · Washington · London · Brussels Copyright © September 1997 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-56432-221-1 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 97-74724 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is based on research in Uganda from late May to early June of 1997. The research was conducted by Rosa Ehrenreich, a consultant for the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project, and by Yodon Thonden, counsel for the Children's Rights Project. The report was written by Rosa Ehrenreich, and edited by Yodon Thonden and Lois Whitman, the director of the Children's Rights Project. Peter Takirambudde, the director of Human Rights Watch's Africa Division, and Joanne Mariner, associate counsel for Human Rights Watch, provided additional comments on the manuscript. Linda Shipley, associate to the Children's Rights Project, provided invaluable production assistance. This report would not have been possible without the assistance of the UNICEF office in Uganda. In particular, we wish to thank Kathleen Cravero, Ponsiano Ochero, Leila Pakkala, and Keith Wright in Kampala, and George Ogol and Moses Ongaria in Gulu. We are also grateful to Professor Semakula Kiwanuka, the Ugandan permanent representative to the United Nations, and to the many Ugandan government officials who facilitated our mission, including Lieutenant Bantariza Shaban, the public relations liasion officer for the Fourth Division of the Uganda People's Defense Force (UPDF), Colonel James Kazini, Commander of the UPDF Fourth Division, and J.J. -
Programme Evaluation
End-term evaluation of the Strategic Partnership Right Here, Right Now (2016- 2020) Let’s talk about sex, baby. nd Final report. March 2 , 2021. Photo credit: The Third Gender by Jake Blues Photography “Let’s talk about sex, baby Let’s talk about you and me Let’s talk about all the good things And the bad things that may be” – Salt-n-Pepa 3 Preface. Let’s talk about sex, baby! Even in countries where talking about sex is still a major taboo, remarkable steps forward have been achieved. Brave organisations and A world where all young people are able to access quality dauntless individuals have found ways to and youth-friendly health services, and are not afraid to initiate Comprehensive Sexuality Education on openly express who they are and who they love. schools, engage with politicians and legislators, have found support to broaden the conditions That is the vision of the Strategic Partnership Right Here for legal and safe abortions, have put same-sex Right Now. marriage on the political agenda, and improved the acceptance by society of the LGBT+ To realise this vision, the right circumstances need to be communities. This list goes on. created where (young) people are empowered to talk about their gender identity, their relationships and also As part of the evaluation, we have assessed and about sex. Not just in the Netherlands, but everywhere. validated all outcomes that were harvested through Outcome Harvesting. We have Civil society organisations in all countries in the world conducted a Sprockler-based inquiry among have a vital role to play in the realisation of this vision. -
Janmyr Civil Militias in Uganda NJHR Aug 2014.Pdf (150.8Kb)
Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 2014 Vol. 32, No. 3, 199–219, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.937203 Recruiting Internally Displaced Persons into Civil Militias: The Case of Northern Uganda Maja Janmyr* Researcher, Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway This article explores the state-sanctioned recruitment of internally displaced persons (IDPs) into civil militias in northern Uganda between 1996 and 2006. Drawing upon international and Ugandan domestic law, as well as empirical research in Uganda, it provides an illustrative case study of the circumstances in which IDPs were mobilised into an array of civil militias. By applying a framework elaborated by the UN Commission on Human Rights, it discusses, and subsequently determines, the lawfulness of this mobilisation. When doing so, the article highlights how, in Uganda, civil militias were dealt with completely outside of domestic law, despite repeated calls from Ugandan MPs to establish their lawfulness. It finds that government authorities long denied any liability for the conduct of the militias, and argues that the uncertain position of the civil militias created plenty of room for unmonitored conduct and substantial human rights abuse. Keywords: Military recruitment; forced recruitment; civil militia; civil defence forces; auxiliary forces; internally displaced persons; Uganda 1. Introduction Military recruitment in the context of displacement has taken place on almost every continent and constitutes one of the most problematic security issues within refugee and internally displaced persons (IDP) camps.1 Refugees and IDPs have long been recruited by both state and non-state actors, forced or otherwise. At the same time, from the perspective of international law, one form of recruitment – recruitment into civil militias – is particularly understudied. -
Policing Politicians: Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda Preliminary Analysis
Policing Politicians: Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda Preliminary Analysis Macartan Humphreys∗ Jeremy M. Weinstein Columbia University Stanford University April 19, 2012 Abstract Identifying the conditions under which politicians are responsive to citizens' needs and preferences is a central concern in the study of political economy. Does greater trans- parency improve political accountability? We use a simple model of political account- ability to derive a set of hypotheses linking access to information to political behavior and provide results from a multi-level field experiment designed to test these hypotheses in the context of parliamentary behavior in Uganda. Between 2006 and 2011, working with a Ugandan partner, we developed a scorecard with detailed information on the performance of Ugandan Members of Parliament (MPs), informed a randomly selected sample of MPs that the information would be disseminated in their constituencies, and provided voters with information about their MP's performance through a variety of dis- semination channels. Evidence from survey experiments indicates that Ugandan voters are strongly receptive to new information about the performance of their MPs. Evidence from the dissemination campaigns, however, provides no evidence that MPs respond to a higher level of transparency with improved performance or that their prospects for reelection are threatened by it. ∗We thank our partners in the field at the Africa Leadership Institute; the Democratic Development Programme, International Growth Centre, and Innovations in Poverty Action for support for data collection; the Center for Global Development for support during the first stages of this research and the baseline survey; and the Trudeau Foundation for support during the analysis phase. -
African Studies Quarterly
African Studies Quarterly Volume 8, Issue 2 Spring 2005 Neither Peace nor Justice: Political Violence and the Peasantry in Northern Uganda, 1986-1998 ADAM BRANCH Abstract: Uncertainty abounds concerning the 19-year conflict in Northern Uganda between the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) and the Ugandan government. Two questions have received the most attention and could have the most bearing on efforts to resolve the conflict: first, why has the Ugandan government been unable or unwilling to end the war for nineteen years? Second, why has the LRA chosen to use extreme violence against the Acholi instead of trying to build popular support? First, this article addresses these questions, arguing that the debate has failed to take into account the political agency of the Acholi peasantry in the conflict and the relations between the peasantry and government, on the one hand, and the peasantry and the LRA, on the other. By putting the Acholi peasantry and its relations with government and rebels at the center of the analysis, the longevity of the war and the tendency by both rebels and government to use violence against the peasantry can be made sense of as a consequence of both sides' failure to realize an effective popular mobilization among the Acholi. Second, the article traces historically these failures of popular mobilization and the paths by which both the Ugandan government and the LRA came to see the population as a threat and potential enemy instead of as a potential support base. Third, by putting the people at the center of the analysis of the conflict, the groundwork is laid for putting the people at the center of the resolution of the conflict, transcending the current tendency of conflict resolution agendas to focus only on elites, treating the civilian population as passive bystanders or victims. -
UGANDA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
UGANDA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 20 April 2011 UGANDA DATE Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN UGANDA FROM 3 FEBRUARY TO 20 APRIL 2011 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON UGANDA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 3 FEBRUARY AND 20 APRIL 2011 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.06 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Political developments: 1962 – early 2011 ......................................................... 3.01 Conflict with Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA): 1986 to 2010.............................. 3.07 Amnesty for rebels (Including LRA combatants) .............................................. 3.09 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................... 4.01 Kampala bombings July 2010 ............................................................................. 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION.......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM .................................................................................................. -
Uganda National Health Laboratory Services Strategic Plan (2010-2015)
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Uganda National Health Laboratory Services Strategic Plan (2010-2015) 2010 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Uganda National Health Laboratory Services Strategic Plan (2010-2015) 2010 National Health Laboratory Strategic Plan, 2010 Page ii Foreword This Strategic Plan (2010/11-2014/15) is a major milestone in the journey towards quality, responsive, accessible and cost effective laboratory services. A well developed laboratory system is a fundamental and crucial component of any health system. Laboratory services range from diagnosis of health/disease conditions for individual patients to national disease surveillance and control of disease outbreaks. It therefore requires the necessary attention and resource investment to fulfill its function. The health system in Uganda aims to deliver a defined National Minimum Health Care Package (UNMHCP) to every member of the Ugandan population. To achieve this laboratory services must be well managed, coordinated and funded. The laboratory services of Uganda have lacked fiscal support required to fulfill their role resulting in increased health care delivery cost due to inadequate disease identification, missed diagnoses, poor case monitoring and management as well as delays in disease outbreak management. This strategic plan is a tool for implementing the National Health Laboratory Policy 2009 as part of the National Health Investment Plan 2010/11 – 2014/15 and aims to rectify this situation. The National Health Laboratory Services Policy was developed and launched in 2009. This policy outlines the vision, goals, and strategies for strengthening key thematic areas of laboratory services in the country to facilitate adequate support to the UNMHCP.