War and Medicine: Exhibition Panel Brochure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

War and Medicine: Exhibition Panel Brochure WAR AND MEDICINE Exhibition panel brochure Facts and responsibility of participation of Japanese medical establishment to 15 years war Project exhibition in the 27th general assembly of the Japan Medical Congress Executive Committee of the War and Medicine Exhibition at the 27th General Assembly of the Japan Medical Congress Exhibition of the 27th General Assembly of The Japan Medical Congress: WAR & MEDICINE The Prospectus The 27th General Assembly of The Japan Medical Congress will be held in Osaka in 2007, the 60th anniversary year of the “Fifteen Years’ War”. This assembly, therefore, affords us a good opportunity to reflect upon the footsteps of the pre and postwar medical establishment of Japan, and in particular with reference to its association with the “War.” Along with the rapid development in medical science and practice, higher standards of medical ethics are required of scholars and doctors. To meet this requirement, one of our important tasks is to look back in a serious way at the path of medical science and practice on which we have trod. The main theme of the 27th Assembly is “the Origin of Life and Medicine̶LIFE, HUMANITY, DREAM,” which encourages the “information transmission from the origin.” This theme must respond to the strong demand on the medical profession for a “reflection from an original point of view.” However, the “reflection from an original point of view” will never be possible without reflecting upon the morality of Japanese medicine during the early Showa period and the “Fifteen Years’ War” to the following “postwar” period̶when the medical science and practice of Japan began to develop and modernize. Above all, the participation of the Japan Medical Association (JMA)/the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences (JAMS) in the “Fifteen Years’ War” and the “human experimentations” and “vivisections” performed by Japanese medical scholars/doctors call out for our inevitable and sincere repentance, considering the inheritance of the postwar medicine from such practices. The whole picture of the issue concerning Unit 731 during the Fifteen Years’ War (hereafter “the Unit 731 issue”) is not yet clarified because of the burning and scattering of contemporaneous documents and the “secrecy” and “concealment” of the remaining ones. GHQ, which occupied Japan at that time, questioned many medical scientists and doctors involved in the Unit but raised no question about war crimes and medical morality. Under these circumstances, among the circles of JMA/JAMS, the truth of the Unit 731 issue has been treated as “obscure,” and the issue itself as “resolved” or “taboo.” During these 60 years almost no commitment has been made to face this issue and the like seriously, and to learn a lesson therewith. In 1951, on its accession to the World Medical Association, JMA made a statement that “as the representative institution of Japanese doctors, JMA, on this occasion, reprimands the violence inflicted upon the people of the enemy countries, and condemns the alleged and in a few cases actually performed cruelties on patients.” This statement, although the only official comment on these issues, is not yet oriented towards a serious reflection on the wartime behavior of the Japanese medical profession, nor to a consequent reconsideration for the future of the ideal/morals of medical science and practice. In Germany, on the contrary, an ally of Japan during the wartime, the Berlin Medical Association (Die Ärztekammer Berlin) declared in 1988 that “we remember the doctors’ roles in Nazism and the unforgettable agonies of victims. The Berlin Medical Council bears that burden of the past. We feel sorrow and shame.” Thus “overcoming the past” has been promoted also in the medical arena. “Those who blink at the past also blink at the present”: this is the historical lesson we mean to learn. In order to make this 60th anniversary a turning point, we would like to expose the former relationship between war and medicine, with special reference to the atrocities committed by the medical scientists and doctors during the war, and to commence a discussion based on historical facts. In this way, we will be able to not only contribute to the establishment of medical ethics and the future of the medical profession, but to stop the growing movement to reverse the wheel of history in Japan. The executive committee of this exhibition has introduced two features: the exhibition booths and the international symposium (at the second site). We wish to dedicate these activities to your better understanding of the truth concerning the complicity of Japanese medical scientists/doctors in the “Fifteen Years’ War,” and to help improve medical ethics in Japan. September, 2006 Executive Committee of the “War and Medicine” Exhibition at the 27th General Assembly of the Japan Medical Congress 1 Introduction On March 30, 1949, at the annual meeting of the House of Delegates, the Japan Medical Association reached a unanimous decision: That the Japan Medical Association, representing the doctors of Japan, takes this occasion to denounce atrocities perpetrated on the enemy during the war period, and to condemn acts of maltreatment of patients which are alleged and in some cases known to have occurred. This statement, however, says nothing about the actual “cruelties.” Without a precise assessment of historical events, we cannot criticize or condemn those “cruelties.” This exhibition offers materials to identify the facts discovered so far, to repent and apologize as the Japanese medical establishment, and to express our resolution never to act against medical ethics. This exhibition consists of four parts: 1.Historical facts about the offences committed by medical scholars and doctors during the war 2.Japanese colonial medicine and practices 3. Influence of war policy/mobilization, and the war itself on medical science 4. Postwar medical establishment in Japan and the Unit 731 issue 2 Historical Background (1) Imperialism The 19th and early 20th centuries were the age of imperialism, when the world was divided by military force into territories of the great powers. Japan, the only imperialist country in Asia, with its slogans, “Enrich the Country, Strengthen the Military” (Fukoku Kyohei) and “Leave Asia and Enter Europe” (Datsua Nyuou), invaded its neighboring nations. 1840-1842 Opium War 1867 Restoration of Imperial Rule 1868 Meiji Restoration 1880s Partition of Africa by European powers 1889 Promulgation of the Constitution of the Empire of Japan 1894-1895 Sino-Japanese War (1895 Taiwan becomes a Japanese territory.) 1898 Spanish-American War (The Philippines become an American territory.) 1902 Anglo-Japanese Alliance 1904 Russo-Japanese War 1910 (Korea becomes Japanese territory.) 1914-1918 World War I 1915 Japan’s Twenty-one Demands on China 1918 Japan’s Siberian Intervention 3 Historical Background (2) Towards Peace and Cooperation After the ravages of World War I, there emerged a trend towards cooperation and reduction in military forces. The Nine- Powers Treaty was signed by the nine major countries including Japan, U.S.A, and Britain, to affirm the sovereignty and territorial integrity of China. In addition, the Treaty for the Renunciation of War (the Pact of Paris) included: Article 1 (renunciation of war). The High Contracting Parties solemnly declare in the names of their respective peoples that they condemn recourse to war for the solution of international controversies, and renounce it, as an instrument of national policy in their relations with one another. Article 2 (settlement of disputes by pacific means). The High Contracting Parties agree that the settlement or solution of all disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them, shall never be sought except by pacific means. 1920 Foundation of the League of Nations 1921 Washington Conference(Washington Naval Treaty) 1922 Nine Powers Treaty 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake 1925 Promulgation of the General Election Law and the Peace Preservation Law 1925 Geneva Protocol (prohibition of the use of chemical and biological weapons in actual warfare) 1927 Showa Financial Crisis 1927 Toho (East) Council (principles of the policy towards China) 1928 Chang Tso-lin murdered in Huanggutun Incident 1929 Pact of Paris (Treaty for the Renunciation of War) 4 Historical Background (3) Japan’s Militarism However, Japan with its militarist policy committed aggression against the Northeast and principal parts of China, which extended to the war in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Ocean. Eventually, more than 20 million people were killed, and Japan ended up in defeat in 1945. 1929 Great Depression 1931 Liutiaohu Incident 1932 Foundation of “Manchukuo” 1933 Japan's withdrawal from the League of Nations 1937 Lugouqiao (Marco Polo Bridge) Incident Nanjing Massacre 1939 Nomonhan Incident 1940 Tripartite Pact among Japan, Germany, and Italy 1941-1945 Pacific War 5 1. Historical Facts about the Offences Committed by Medical Scholars and Doctors during the War This exhibition demonstrates the fact that, mainly in overseas countries, Japanese medical scientists and doctors killed a total amount of, reportedly, thousands of people by performing experiments or practicing surgeries on them, from around 1932 till Japan lost the war in August 1945. The venues for these practices are chiefly the “Ishii Network”̶ including Unit 731̶organized by Shiro Ishii for research in military medicine, and the military hospitals in the occupied areas. Some other experiments were also conducted at prestigious academies, such as Manchuria Medical College and Kyushu Imperial University. 6 Ishii Network This was a network of military medicine built by the army surgeon Shiro Ishii. Its “Unit 731” produced biological weapons and violated international law by actually using them in the Nomonhan Incident and the second Sino- Japanese War. This Unit is said to have experimented on and killed approximately 3,000 Chinese and others for the investigation of military medicine. Those who performed the human experimentation flew back to Japan towards the end of the war and, by presenting the research data to the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Bubonic Plague
    THE BLACK DEATH, OR BUBONIC PLAGUE “I know histhry isn’t thrue, Hinnissy, because it ain’t like what I see ivry day in Halsted Street. If any wan comes along with a histhry iv Greece or Rome that’ll show me th’ people fightin’, gettin’ dhrunk, makin’ love, gettin’ married, owin’ th’ grocery man an’ bein’ without hard coal, I’ll believe they was a Greece or Rome, but not befur.” — Dunne, Finley Peter, OBSERVATIONS BY MR. DOOLEY, New York, 1902 An infectious virus, according to Peter Medewar, is a piece of nucleic acid surrounded by bad news. This is what the virus carried by the female Culicidae Aëdes aegypti mosquito, causing what was known as black vomit, the American plague, yellow jacket, bronze John, dock fever, stranger’s fever (now standardized as the “yellow fever”) actually looks like, Disney-colorized for your entertainment: And this is what the infectious virus causing Rubeola, the incredibly deadly and devastating German measles, looks like, likewise Disney-colorized for your entertainment: Most infectious viruses have fewer than 10 genes, although the virus that caused the small pox was the biggie exception, having from 200 to 400 genes: HDT WHAT? INDEX BUBONIC PLAGUE THE BLACK DEATH Then, of course, there is the influenza, which exists in various forms as different sorts of this virus mutate and migrate from time to time from other species into humans — beginning with an “A” variety that made the leap from wild ducks to domesticated ducks circa 2500 BCE. (And then there is our little friend the coma bacillus Vibrio cholerae, that occasionally makes its way from our privies into our water supplies and causes us to come down with the “Asiatic cholera.”) On the other hand, the scarlet fever, also referred to as Scarlatina, is an infection caused not by a virus but by one or another of the hemoglobin-liberating bacteria, typically Streptococcus pyogenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Honolulu Advertiser & Star-Bulletin Obituaries January 1
    Honolulu Advertiser & Star-Bulletin Obituaries January 1 - December 31, 1995 M Paul Lawrence Madison Jr. , a jazz tenor saxophonist who played with such greats as Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, died Jan. 22, 1995 at his Wahiawa home. He was 64. Madison was born Nov. 11, 1930 in Hutchinson, KA. His father was a musician and he received his first saxophone – a toy one – at age 3. Two years later he got a real one. By the time he was 15, Madison was heading up his own band. Among his musical associates were some of the greatest names in jazz. They included bassist Charles Mingus, Nat King Cole, guitarist Joe Comfort and pianist Art Tatum. “And of course Charlie Parker was his mentor,” said Madison’s wife, Classie. “He sort of sat at his knee and learned from him.” “From Gillespie, she said, Madison learned more than just blow.” He had a feel for quality and that’s what he tried to do in his music.Madison came to Hawaii in 1963 with a band, Classie said, and “stayed because he met me.” She was living in Haleiwa she said and was introduced to Madison by a close friend. They married on Jan. 19, 1965 and celebrated their 30th wedding anniversary a few days before Madison’s death. In Hawaii, Madison started a roofing business, but he condinued playing as often as possible. He played with the Doug McDonald Trio at the Ilikai Hotel and various other hotels, clubs and restaurants, including the Sheraton Waikiki’s Hanohano room. He once recorded a cassette with McDonald.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Warfare Issues
    CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Warfare Issues ISSUE NO. 30 DECEMBER 1995 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation OVER THE IMPASSE The dispute with the White House in which the Chair- Third, the Preparatory Commission needs to reach final man of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee decisions soon regarding management and technical mat- blocked action on the Chemical Weapons Convention and ters that require decision well before entry into force. Such other Executive Branch requests for most of this year has long lead-time matters include approval of the design and been resolved. funding of the Information Management System which On the floor of the Senate early this month the Foreign must be up and running before declarations containing con- Relations Committee Chairman, Senator Jesse Helms, an- fidential information can be processed by the Technical nounced that the Committee will resume hearings on the Secretariat; agreement on declaration-related and industry- Convention in February and that the Convention will be related issues to allow States Parties sufficient time to pre- moved out of committee no later than the end of April. As pare their declarations and facility agreements; and part of the agreement, the Senate Majority Leader, Senator agreement on conditions of service for OPCW personnel so Robert Dole, who controls floor scheduling, pledged to that recruitment of inspectors and others can proceed place the Convention before the full Senate within a “rea- smoothly. sonable time period” after it leaves the Committee. This means that the Senate could vote on the Convention in May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacific War As Total War
    [Chairman’s Summary] The Pacific War as Total War Junichiro Shoji The Forum of this fiscal year is the fifth project on the Pacific War starting from FY2007 and its theme was set as the “Pacific War as Total War”. In this year, the word called “post disaster” was born instead of “postwar” because of the Great East Japan Earthquake that occurred on March 11, 2011. This shows that the great earthquake had a considerable impact on the Japanese society and it is still in our mind. On the other hand, this year is the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of the Pacific War and the 150th anniversary of the U.S. Civil War that occurred in the U.S. mainland and caused a total of about 600,000 deaths from the two armies. This war is said to be a precedent of total war. Nowadays the word “total war” is used vaguely without careful consideration in many cases, and it is occasionally used as a pronoun that means “put all efforts”. For example, a commentator described the championship game between Japanese team and the U.S. team in the FIFAWomen’s World Cup as the “total war”. A person who introduced the concept of “total war” for the first time in the history is French politician Leon Daudet. He published La guerre totale (The Total War) in 1918 based on the lessons learnt from the battle with Germany in the First World War. In the background, there was recognition that World War I was a totally different type of war from traditional wars in which only armies participated.
    [Show full text]
  • My Neighbor, My Enemy: Understanding the Protracted Conflict Between China and Japan
    MY NEIGHBOR, MY ENEMY: UNDERSTANDING THE PROTRACTED CONFLICT BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English By Go Funai, B.S. Washington, DC May 1, 2009 The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to everyone who helped along the way, especially Professor Alan C. Tidwell, my thesis advisor, and Professor Fathali M. Moghaddam, my thesis committee member. Many thanks, Go Funai ii MY NEIGHBOR, MY ENEMY: UNDERSTADNING THE PROTRACTED CONFLICT BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN Go Funai, B.S. Thesis Advisor: Alan C. Tidwell, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Despite numerous attempts at political reconciliation and increasing levels of economic interdependence, tensions between China and Japan remain high. The bitter rivalry, ostensibly rooted in the Second World War, grabbed the world’s attention in 2005 when anti-Japan protests erupted in over 40 cities throughout China. This study examines why China and Japan remain sworn enemies even though they share realistic reasons to reconcile. While the existing literature acknowledges historical enmity as the primary source of conflict, it does not rigorously explain the underpinnings and dynamics of that enmity. Thus, the purpose of this study is to fill this analytic gap using ideas in conflict resolution and social psychology. I argue that China and Japan are mired in an identity-based conflict that is best understood by examining enmification, or the process of creating enemies, throughout its history of conflict dating back to the 16th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads of Technical Information
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Nuclear Spaces: Simulations of Nuclear Warfare in Film, by the Numbers, and on the Atomic Battlefield Donald J. Kinney Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NUCLEAR SPACES: SIMULATIONS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE IN FILM, BY THE NUMBERS, AND ON THE ATOMIC BATTLEFIELD By DONALD J KINNEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Donald J. Kinney defended this dissertation on October 15, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Dissertation Joseph R. Hellweg University Representative Jonathan A. Grant Committee Member Kristine C. Harper Committee Member Guenter Kurt Piehler Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Morgan, Nala, Sebastian, Eliza, John, James, and Annette, who all took their turns on watch as I worked. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Kris Harper, Jonathan Grant, Kurt Piehler, and Joseph Hellweg. I would especially like to thank Ron Doel, without whom none of this would have been possible. It has been a very long road since that afternoon in Powell's City of Books, but Ron made certain that I did not despair. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Acervos Acadêmicos De Pesquisa: Possibilidades E Desafios
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7976.2016v22n34p13 THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BRAZILIAN- AMERICAN MILITARY ALLIANCE, 1942-1977 A ASCENSÃO E A QUEDA DA ALIANÇA MILITAR BRASILEIRA-AMERICANA, 1942-1977 Frank D. McCann* Abstract: The article examines how the military alliance took shape in the early years of World War II, how the Brazilian Expeditionary Force became symbolic of Brazil’s war role, and how end of war decisions effected Brazil’s gains. Brazilian leaders promised more than they could deliver. The post war era saw less cooperation but continued efforts at maintaining good relations. Vargas to Geisel years brought shifts that ultimately led to unilateral renouncement of the alliance. Even so the two militaries sought to maintain ties where possible. The text sketches the long term relations and it is based on archival research. Keywords: American and Brazilian armies; Brazilian Expeditionary Force; Cold War; Human Rights; Military Regime. * University of New Hampshire, Estados Unidos da América, e-mail: monteagleridge@ msn.com Revista Esboços, Florianópolis, v. 22, n. 34, p. 13-60, jul. 2016. 14 Resumo: O artigo analisa como a aliança militar tomou forma nos primeiros anos da Segunda Guerra Mundial, como a Força Expedicionária Brasileira tornou-se simbólica para o papel brasileiro na guerra, e como as decisões do final da guerra afetaram os ganhos do Brasil. As lideranças brasileiras prometeram mais do que podiam entregar. A era pós-guerra viu menos cooperação, mas os esforços na manutenção de boas relações continuaram. O período entre Vargas e Geisel anos trouxe mudanças que culminaram com a renúncia unilateral da aliança.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsetusuo Wakabayashi, Revealed
    Tsetusuo Wakabayashi, Revealed By Dwight R. Rider Edited by Eric DeLaBarre Preface Most great works of art begin with an objective in mind; this is not one of them. What follows in the pages below had its genesis in a research effort to determine what, if anything the Japanese General Staff knew of the Manhattan Project and the threat of atomic weapons, in the years before the detonation of an atomic bomb over Hiroshima in August 1945. That project drew out of an intense research effort into Japan’s weapons of mass destruction programs stretching back more than two decades; a project that remains on-going. Unlike a work of art, this paper is actually the result of an epiphany; a sudden realization that allows a problem, in this case the Japanese atomic energy and weapons program of World War II, to be understood from a different perspective. There is nothing in this paper that is not readily accessible to the general public; no access to secret documents, unreported interviews or hidden diaries only recently discovered. The information used in this paper has been, for the most part, available to researchers for nearly 30 years but only rarely reviewed. The paper that follows is simply a narrative of a realization drawn from intense research into the subject. The discoveries revealed herein are the consequence of a closer reading of that information. Other papers will follow. In October of 1946, a young journalist only recently discharged from the US Army in the drawdown following World War II, wrote an article for the Atlanta Constitution, the premier newspaper of the American south.
    [Show full text]
  • John Vandermeer
    JOHN VANDERMEER - THE DIALECTICS OF ECOLOGY: BIOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL INTERSECTIONS PUBLICATIONS OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 1 GERALD SMITH, Editor LINDA GARCIA, Managing Editor ELIZABETH WASON AND KATHERINE LOUGHNEY, Proofreaders GORDON FITCH AND MACKENZIE SCHONDLEMAYER, Cover graphics The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each are sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, Insects, Mollusks, and other topics is available. Address inquiries to Publications, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1079.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline for World War II — Japan
    Unit 5: Crisis and Change Lesson F: The Failure of Democracy and Return of War Student Resource: Timeline for World War II — Japan Timeline for World War II — Japan Pre-1920: • 1853: American Commodore Matthew Perry arrived in Tokyo harbor and forced the Japanese to allow trade with U.S. merchants with threat of military action. • 1858: Western nations forced Japan to sign the Unequal Treaties. These articles established export and import tariffs and the concept of "extraterritoriality" (i.e., Japan held no jurisdiction over foreign criminals in its land. Their trials were to be conducted by foreign judges under their own nation's laws). Japan had no power to change these terms. • 1868: Japan, in an effort to modernize and prevent future Western dominance, ousted the Tokugawa Shogunate and adopted a new Meiji Emperor. The next few decades saw rapid and successful industrialization during the Meiji Restoration. • 1899: With newly gained power from recent industrialization, Japan successfully renegotiated aspects of the Unequal Treaties. • 1899–1901: The Boxer Rebellion led China to a humiliating defeat by the Eight-Nation Alliance of Western powers including the United States and Japan, ceding more territory, and dealing one of the final blows to the struggling Qing Dynasty. • 1904–1905: The Russo-Japanese War began with a surprise attack and ended by an eventual Japanese victory over Imperial Russia. The Japanese took control of Korea. • 1914: During World War I, Japan and other Allies seized German colonial possessions. • 1919: Japan, as a member of the victorious Allies during World War I, gained a mandate over various Pacific islands previously part of the German colonial empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Where in the World War?
    Where in the World War? As an introduction to World War II in the Pacific, students will use classroom reference materials to learn the basic geography of the Pacific Theatre of Operations. Grades: 6, 7, 8 Disciplines: Geography, Social Studies, Reading Americans who served in the Pacific fought a very different kind of war. Whether in the jungles of New Guinea or on tiny atolls in the central Pacific, they confronted environments and cultures with fewer reference points. For all Americans at home, following news of the war in the Pacific meant learning the geography and place names across that vast ocean. Strangers in a Strange Land Places in the Pacific Sixty years ago, a generation of young Americans left their homes to fight a world war. That war was waged in two distant and very different places. In Europe, Americans faced hardship and danger. But they did so amid people and places that—while foreign—had important connections with their lives back in America. Terrain, weather, place names and, sometimes, ethnic ties were familiar links that provided some measure of comfort against the hardships of war. Americans who fought the Japanese in the Pacific fought a very different kind of war. Whether in the jungles of New Guinea or on tiny atolls in the central Pacific, they confronted environments and cultures with fewer reference points. Their war involved vast distances, isolation and harsh, unfamiliar surroundings that placed special burdens on them. Over two million young Americans went to war in the Pacific. They served in places as remote and far-flung as the Philippines, the Solomon Islands and Okinawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History
    3 ASIAN HISTORY Porter & Porter and the American Occupation II War World on Reflections Japanese Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The Asian History series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hägerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Members Roger Greatrex, Lund University Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University David Henley, Leiden University Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: 1938 Propaganda poster “Good Friends in Three Countries” celebrating the Anti-Comintern Pact Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 259 8 e-isbn 978 90 4853 263 6 doi 10.5117/9789462982598 nur 692 © Edgar A. Porter & Ran Ying Porter / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]