DOCSLIB.ORG

Micropropagation of Astrophytum Myriostigma Lem. Through Areoles Activation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Micropropagation of Astrophytum Myriostigma Lem. Through Areoles Activation Propagation of Ornamental Plants Vol. 20, № 4, 2020: 111-117 MICROPROPAGATION OF ASTROPHYTUM MYRIOSTIGMA LEM. THROUGH AREOLES ACTIVATION Kihwan Song1, Hyeonjeong Kang2, Doo Hwan Kim3, and Iyyakkannu Sivanesan3* 1Department of Bioindustry and Bioresource Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05006 Seoul, Republic of Korea 2 Babo Orchid Farm, Gyeonggi-do, 472-831 Namyangju-si, Republic of Korea 3Department of Bioresources and Food Science, Institute of Natural Science and Agriculture, Konkuk University, 1 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, 05029 Seoul, Republic of Korea *Fax: + 8224503310, *E-mail: [email protected] REFERENCES Castro-Gallo I. A., Meza-Rangel E., Pérez-Reyes M. E., Pérez-Molphe-Balch E. (2002). In vitro propagation of 10 Mexican cacti species. Scientiae Naturae, 4: 5-24 (in Spanish). Clayton P. W., Hubstenberger J. F., Phillips G. C. (1990). Micropropagation of members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 115: 337-343. Das A. B. (2008). Assessment of genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of ‘Star Cactus’ (Astrophytum) through chromosome and RAPD markers. Cytologia, 73: 179-88. Erwin J., Altman K., Esqueda F. (2017). Temperature impacts cactus and succulent development rate. HortTechnology, 27: 65-68. García-Rubio O., Malda-Barrera G. (2010). Micropropagation and reintroduction of the endemic Mammillaria mathildae (Cac- taceae) to its natural habitat. HortScience, 45: 934-938. Giusti P., Vitti D., Fiocchetti F., Colla G., Saccardo F., Tucci M. (2002). In vitro propagation of three endangered cactus spe- cies. Scientia Horticulturae, 95: 319-332. Infante R. (1992). In vitro axillary shoot proliferation and somatic embryogenesis of yellow pitaya Mediocactus coccineus (Slam-Dy- ck). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 31: 155-159. Kim D. H., Enkhtaivan G., Saini R. K., Keum Y-S., Kang K. W., Sivanesan I. (2019). Production of bioactive compounds in cla- dode culture of Turbinicarpus valdezianus (H. Moeller) Glass & R. C. Foster. Industrial Crops & Products, 138: Article 111491. Lázaro-Castellanos J.O., Mata-Rosas M., González D., Arias S., Reverchon F. (2018). In vitro propagation of endangered Mammillaria genus (Cactaceae) species and genetic stability assessment using SSR markers. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 54: 518-529. Lema-Rumińska J., Kulus D. (2014). Micropropagation of cacti: a review. Haseltonia, 19: 46-63. Machado M. F. P. S., Prioli A. J. (1996). Micropropagation of Cereus peruvianus Mill. (Cactaceae) by areole activation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 32: 199-203. Martínez-Vázquez O., Rubluo A. (1989). In vitro mass propagation of the near-extinct Mammillaria san-angelensis Sánchez- Mejorada. Journal of Horticultural Science, 64: 99-105. Mohamed-Yasseen Y. (2002). Micropropagation of pitaya (Hylocereus undatus Britton et rose). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 38: 427-429. Murashige T., Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plan- tarum, 15: 473-497. Papafotiou M., Balotis G., Louka P., Chronopoulos J. (2001). In vitro plant regeneration of Mammillaria elongata normal and cristate forms. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 65: 163-167. Pérez-Molphe-Balch E., Pérez Reyes M. E., Villalobos Amador E., Meza Rangel E., Morones Ruiz L. R., Lizalde Viramon- tes H. J. (1998). Micropropagation of 21 species of Mexican cacti by axillary proliferation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 34: 131-135. Pérez-Molphe-Balch E., Santos-Díaz M., Ramírez-Malagón R., Ochoa-Alejo N. (2015). Tissue culture of ornamental cacti. Scientia Agricola, 72: 540-561. Ramirez-Malagon R., Aguilar-Ramirez I., Borodanenko A., Perez-Moreno L., Barrera-Guerra J., Nuñez-Palenius H. G., Ochoa-Alejo N. (2007). In vitro propagation of ten threatened species of Mammillaria (Cactaceae). In Vitro Cellular & Devel- opmental Biology-Plant, 43: 660-665. Rowley G. (2003). What is an areole? British Cactus & Succulent Journal, 21: 4-11. Vázquez-Lobo A., Morales G. A., Arias S., Golubov J., Hernández-Hernández T., Mandujano M. C. (2015). Phylogeny and biogeographic history of Astrophytum (Cactaceae). Systematic Botany, 40: 1022-1030. Vyscot J., Jára Z. (1984). Clonal propagation of cacti through axillary buds in vitro. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 59: 449-452..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias) Recovery Plan September 2003 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. i-vii + 38pp., A1-19, B- 1-8. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 1-301-492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 The fee for the Plan varies depending on the number of pages of the Plan. Recovery Plans can be downloaded from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website: http://endangered.fws.gov. -i- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express great appreciation to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship Between Peyote (Lophophora Williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)
    A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship between Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). 1 2 2 TERRY, M. , D. PRICE , AND J. POOLE. 1Sul Ross State University, Department of Biology, Alpine, Texas 79832. 2Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Wildlife Diversity Branch, 3000 S. IH-35, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78704. ABSTRACT Astrophytum asterias, commonly called star cactus, is a federally listed endangered cactus endemic to the Tamaulipan thornscrub ecoregion of extreme southern Texas, USA, and Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Only three metapopulations totaling less than 4000 plants are presently known in Texas. Star cactus, known locally as “star peyote”, is highly sought by collectors. This small, dome-shaped, spineless, eight- ribbed cactus is sometimes mistaken for peyote (Lophophora williamsii), which grows in the same or adjacent habitats. Peyote is harvested from native thornscrub habitats in Texas by local Hispanic people and sold to peyoteros, licensed distributors who sell the peyote to Native American Church members. Annual peyote harvests in Texas approach 2,000,000 “buttons” (crowns). Although the peyoteros do not buy star cactus from harvesters, they cultivate star cactus in peyote gardens at their places of business and give star cacti to their customers as lagniappe. If even 0.1% of harvested “peyote” is actually star cactus, the annual take of this endangered cactus approaches the total number of wild specimens known in the U.S. This real but unquantifiable take, together with information from interviews with local residents, suggests the existence of many more star cactus populations than have been documented. ASTROPHYTUM AND LOPHOPHORA – Poole 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpted From
    Excerpted from © by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. May not be copied or reused without express written permission of the publisher. click here to BUY THIS BOOK CHAPTER ›3 ‹ ROOT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION Joseph G. Dubrovsky and Gretchen B. North Introduction Structure Primary Structure Secondary Structure Root Types Development and Growth Indeterminate Root Growth Determinate Root Growth Lateral Root Development Root System Development Adaptations to Deserts and Other Arid Environments Root Distribution in the Soil Environmental Effects on Root Development Developmental Adaptations Water and Mineral Uptake Root Hydraulic Conductivity Mineral Uptake Mycorrhizal and Bacterial Associations Carbon Relations Conclusions and Future Prospects Literature Cited rocky or sandy habitats. The goals of this chapter are to re- Introduction view the literature on the root biology of cacti and to pres- From the first moments of a plant’s life cycle, including ent some recent findings. First, root structure, growth, and germination, roots are essential for water uptake, mineral development are considered, then structural and develop- acquisition, and plant anchorage. These functions are es- mental adaptations to desiccating environments, such as pecially significant for cacti, because both desert species deserts and tropical tree canopies, are analyzed, and finally and epiphytes in the cactus family are faced with limited the functions of roots as organs of water and mineral up- and variable soil resources, strong winds, and frequently take are explored. 41 (Freeman 1969). Occasionally, mucilage cells are found in Structure the primary root (Hamilton 1970).Figure3.1nearhere: Cactus roots are less overtly specialized in structure than Differentiation of primary tissues starts soon after cell are cactus shoots.
    [Show full text]
  • Ist Astrophytum Coahuilense Ein Naturhybrid? 37
    M6000E Heft 2 Februar 1993 Kakten Jahrgang 44 und andere Sukkulenten Kakteen und andere Sukkulenten Monatlich erscheinendes Organ der als Herausgeber genannten Gesellschaften Heft 2 • Februar 1993 • Jahrgang 44 • ISSN 0022 7846 Zum Titelbild: Astrophytum coahuilense (Moeller) Kayser gehört zu den interessantesten Pflanzen innerhalb der morphologisch so variablen Gattung Astrophytum Lemaire. Es ähnelt einerseits in der äußeren Wuchsform genau Astrophytum myriostigma Lemaire: wie dieses besitzt es meist fünf Rippen und ist dicht mit weißen Wollflocken bedeckt. Sobald jedoch die prächtigen, großen Blüten erscheinen wird andererseits klar, daß eine enge Verwandtschaft zu Astrophytum capricorne (Dietrich) Britton & Rose bestehen muß. Sie sind im Schlund orange bis tiefrot gefärbt und bei Befruchtung entwickelt sich eine purpur-violette, samenreiche Frucht. Die überraschende Mischung der vegetativen und generativen Merkmale bei Astrophytum coahuilense aus den Astrophytum-Linien des südlichen und nördlichen mexikanischen Hochlandes ist auch der Grund für einen noch heute andauernden Meinungsunterschied, wie diese schönen Pflanzen taxonomisch oder in ihrer evolutiven Entwicklung einzustufen sind. Einen Lösungsvor­ schlag hierzu finden Sie in einem Beitrag auf Seite 37. Astrophytum coahuilense sollte man an einem sonnigen Platz pflegen und von April bis Oktober maßvoll wässern. Ein rein mineralisches Substrat, wie beispielsweise Ziegelsplitt mit Sand gemischt, bietet dann nach trockener Überwinterung um 15-20°C die optimalen Voraussetzungen für regelmäßige Blüten während der sommerlichen Wachtumszeit. Heinz Hoock Foto: Josef Busek Inhalt: Erstbeschreibung Werner Rauh Euphorbia subpeltatophylla - eine bemerkenswerte Art aus Madagaskar 25 Artenschutz Hans Joachim Hilgert Neues vom Washingtoner Artenschutz-Übereinkommen 28 Aus der Praxis Rolf Pinter " Exotisches" Frühbeet ohne sichtbaren Platzmangel 29 In Kultur beobachtet Josef Prantner Lobivia formosa 30 Aus anderen Fachzeitschriften Klaus J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wonderful World of Cacti. July 7, 2020
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulents part 1: The wonderful world of cacti. July 7, 2020 Betzy Rivera. Master Gardener Volunteer OSU Extension – Franklin County OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulent plants Are plants with parts that are thickened and fleshy, capacity that helps to retain water in arid climates. Over 25 families have species of succulents. The most representative families are: Crassulaceae, Agavaceae, Aizoaceae, Euphorbiacea and Cactaceae. 2 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family is endemic to America and the distribution extends throughout the continent from Canada to Argentina, in addition to the Galapagos Islands and Antilles Most important centers of diversification (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Arias-Montes, 1993; Anderson, 2001; Guzmán et al., 2003; Ortega- Baes & Godínez-Alvarez, 2006 3 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION There is an exception — one of the 1,800 species occurs naturally in Africa, Sri Lanka, and Madagascar Rhipsalis baccifera 4 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family includes between ~ 1,800 and 2,000 species whose life forms include climbing, epiphytic, shrubby, upright, creeping or decumbent plants, globose, cylindrical or columnar in shape (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 5 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Cacti are found in a wide variety of environments, however the greatest diversity of forms is found in arid and semi-arid areas, where they play an important role in maintaining the stability of ecosystems (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 6 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family are dicotyledonous plants 2 cotyledons Astrophytum myriostigma (common names: Bishop´s cap cactus, bishop’s hat or miter cactus) 7 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION General Anatomy of a Cactus Cactus spines are produced from specialized structures called areoles, a kind of highly reduced branch.
    [Show full text]
  • RMB-439 C-Formato.Indd
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 163- 175, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2010.001.186 Is geographical rarity frequent among the cacti of the Chihuahuan Desert? ¿Es la rareza geográfi ca frecuente entre las cactáceas del Desierto Chihuahuense? Héctor M. Hernández*, Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa and Gibrán Hoffmann Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-233, 04510 Mexico D. F., Mexico. *Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. With the aim of assessing the extent of geographical rarity of Mexican Cactaceae, we calculated the distribution size (area of occupancy) of 142 species from the Chihuahuan Desert. In addition, using 2 variables (number of localities and range size), we preliminarily assessed their conservation status using the current IUCN Red List criteria. The results showed enormous variation in the areas of occupancy, although from the biogeographic and conservation perspective the most exceptional group comprises the extremely narrow endemics (42 species), whose range is restricted to areas smaller than 10 km2. Our results reinforce the reputation of this plant family as exceptionally rare geographically. We suggest that geographical rarity of Cactaceae in the Chihuahuan Desert is a natural phenomenon; however, we propose that the range of several species has been infl uenced by human activities. Regarding the conservation status of the species, 75 of them are categorized as Least concern. The remaining 67 species (47.2%) fall in 1 of the 3 categories of threat (27 Vulnerable, 11 Endangered, and 29 Critically endangered). These fi gures confi rm the critical conservation status of Mexican Cactaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the TAXONOMY of CACTACEAE JUSS by the EVIDENCE of SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY and SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F
    European Journal of Botany, Plant Sciences and Phytology Vol.2, No.3, pp.1-15, October 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) ON THE TAXONOMY OF CACTACEAE JUSS BY THE EVIDENCE OF SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY AND SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F. Shalabi Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. ABSTRACT Numerical classification of 16 taxa of Cactaceae was studied using combination of micromorphological characters of seeds (using L.M and SEM) and SDS- PAGE analysis. Aspects of seed micromorphology and seed protein variation as defined were recorded and scored comparatively for the OTU's into a data matrix. Phenetic relationships of these taxa were established based on UPGMA-clustering method by using Jaccard coefficient of the NTSYS-pc 2.2 program. The results were compatible with the traditional relationships of some taxa as the split-off of Opuntia humifusa and Astrophytum myriostigma, at separate lines, these results are compatible with their placement in tribes Opuntieae (subfamily Opuntioideae) and Cacteae (Subfamily cactoideae) respectively, at the time, the placement of three taxa Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa, Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 1, and Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 2 together, the clustering of Hylocereus triangularis and Neobuxbaumia euphorbioides together at a unique tribe Phyllocacteae. The findings contradict in a number of cases the traditional studies, as the grouping of Trichocereus vasquezii with the two represents of genus Parodia despite of their placement in different tribes. KEYWORDS: Cactaceae, SDS-PAGE, Seed micromorpgology, SEM INTRODUCTION The Cactaceae are an exciting and problematic group of plants because of their varied morphology, succulence, and their showy flowers (Barthlott and Hunt 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Major Families and Genera of Succulent Plants
    SOME MAJOR FAMILIES AND GENERA OF SUCCULENT PLANTS Including Natural Distribution, Growth Form, and Popularity as Container Plants Daniel L. Mahr There are 50-60 plant families that contain at least one species of succulent plant. By far the largest families are the Cactaceae (cactus family) and Aizoaceae (also known as the Mesembryanthemaceae, the ice plant family), each of which contains about 2000 species; together they total about 40% of all succulent plants. In addition to these two families there are 6-8 more that are commonly grown by home gardeners and succulent plant enthusiasts. The following list is in alphabetic order. The most popular genera for container culture are indicated by bold type. Taxonomic groupings are changed occasionally as new research information becomes available. But old names that have been in common usage are not easily cast aside. Significant name changes noted in parentheses ( ) are listed at the end of the table. Family Major Genera Natural Distribution Growth Form Agavaceae (1) Agave, Yucca New World; mostly Stemmed and stemless Century plant and U.S., Mexico, and rosette-forming leaf Spanish dagger Caribbean. succulents. Some family yuccas to tree size. Many are too big for container culture, but there are some nice small and miniature agaves. Aizoaceae (2) Argyroderma, Cheiridopsis, Mostly South Africa Highly succulent leaves. Iceplant, split-rock, Conophytum, Dactylopis, Many of these stay very mesemb family Faucaria, Fenestraria, small, with clumps up to Frithia, Glottiphyllum, a few inches. Lapidaria, Lithops, Nananthus, Pleisopilos, Titanopsis, others Delosperma; several other Africa Shrubs or ground- shrubby genera covers. Some marginally hardy. Mestoklema, Mostly South Africa Leaf, stem, and root Trichodiadema, succulents.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER PROGRAM ANNUAL COUNTRY STORE - SEPTEMBER 28Th
    Next Meeting MONDAY September 28 Sacramento CactusThorny & Succulent Society September Issues 2015 | Volume 56, IX Photo by Gerhard Bock Gerhard Photo by SEPTEMBER PROGRAM ANNUAL COUNTRY STORE - SEPTEMBER 28th e have an exciting meeting this month! Our annual Country Store is finally here! Members and welcomed guests will find a feeding frenzy of plants, food, plus a silent auction of succulent related items. Raffle tickets are 50¢. Members may donate plants to each of the following tables: Cactus, Other Succulents, and House Plants, whichW include non-succulent plants (i.e., bulbs, geraniums), and related items (extra pots, labels, etc.) Green thumb gardeners may donate their extra produce – tomatoes, zucchini, jars of jam, etc., to the Produce Table. Those who are working their way through Julia Child’s cookbooks may donate to the Sweet Shoppe where all things must be butter-and sugar-laden. Please place your baked goods on small paper plates and cover with plastic wrap for ease of raffling. To finish off the evening is the Succulent Silent Auction where donations of Succulent related items – books, tee shirts, better plants, kitschy stuff – will be fought over by those who haven’t spent all their money at the Sweet Shoppe. All proceeds go to the club’s treasury for future cactus and succulent adventures. Bring your donations, bring your money, bring your appetite and bring boxes to haul home your loot. This is a non-business meeting; doors open at 6:30 and we get rolling promptly at 7:00 pm. Bring your cuttings or pups to the Country Store! SEPTEMBER SUCCULENT AND CACTUS MINI SHOW Mini Show Descriptions by Steve Goodman.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cactaceae Juss.) Species
    Acta Agrobotanica DOI: 10.5586/aa.1697 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-05-24 Accepted: 2016-10-03 Anatomical and morphological features Published: 2016-12-20 of seedlings of some Cactoideae Eaton Handling editor Barbara Łotocka, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw (Cactaceae Juss.) species University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Poland Halyna Kalashnyk1*, Nataliia Nuzhyna2, Maryna Gaidarzhy2 Authors’ contributions 1 HK: carried out the experiments Department of Botany, Educational and Scientific Center “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, and wrote the manuscript; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, S. Petlyury 1, Kyiv 01032, Ukraine 2 NN: designed the anatomical Scientific laboratory “Introduced and natural phytodiversity”, Educational and Scientific Center experiment and contributed “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, S. Petlyury 1, to data interpretation; MG: Kyiv 01032, Ukraine designed the experiment, * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] critically read the manuscript and contributed to data interpretation Abstract Funding Three-month-old seedlings of 11 species of the subfamily Cactoideae Melocac( - This study was financed from the research project tus bahiensis, Melocactus curvispinus, Echinopsis eyriesii, E. mirablis, E. peruviana, No. 14БП036-01 at the Taras Oreocereus celsianus, Rebutia flavistyla, Rebutia minuscula, Astrophytum myrios- Shevchenko National University tigma, Mamillaria columbiana, and M. prolifera) have been studied. These plants of Kyiv. exhibit a uniseriate epidermis, covered by a thin cuticle. Except for E. peruviana Competing interests and A. myriostigma, no hypodermis could be detected. The shoots of all studied No competing interests have specimens consist mainly of cortex parenchyma with large thin-walled cells. The been declared.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Cactus Recovery Plan (Plan) Will Both Ensure the Species’ Survival and Provide the Information Necessary to Develop Delisting Criteria
    D R A F T STAR CACTUS (Astrophytum asterias) RECOVERY PLAN Astrophytum asterias (Zuccarini-Lemaire). Photo courtesy of Charlie McDonald, USDA Forest Service Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico October 2002 Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 D R A F T STAR CACTUS (Astrophytum asterias) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by: Loretta Pressly U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Corpus Christi, Texas for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2 Albuquerque, New Mexico Approved:______________________ Regional Director, Region 2 Date: ______________________ Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 Acknowledgments The author wishes to express great appreciation to Ms. Angela Brooks for her work on this draft recovery plan. Without her devotion to endangered species protection with emphasis on plant conservation in South Texas, this recovery plan would not be complete. Additionally, the author appreciates the review and editing work performed by Robyn Cobb, Sharon Becton, Mary Orms, and Tracy Scheffler of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and thanks Ms. Jackie Poole, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, for her involvement in the development of this draft recovery plan, as well as her continued support for protecting endangered, threatened, and rare plant species in Texas. Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]