DOCSLIB.ORG

Succulents Now Plant List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Succulents Now Plant List Succulents Now Email: [email protected] Telephone: 07 3802 0748 Plant List 10 November 2016 2” 2.5” 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” Plant Name 5 cm 6.3 cm 7.5 cm 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Ariocarpus agavoides 20 Ariocarpus agavoides (Tula) 20 Ariocarpus agavoides SB870 20 Ariocarpus bravoanus ssp. hintonii 25 30 Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus 20 25 Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus 25 30 x Ario. agavoides Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus v albiflorus 20 25 Ariocarpus retusus 35 40 Ariocarpus retusus v furfuraceus 50 Ariocarpus retusus x trigonus 45 Ariocarpus trigonus 20 Astrophytum asterias 10 14 Astrophytum asterias pink flower 15 20 Astrophytum asterias yellow and pink flower 15 20 Astrophytum asterias v. microsemium 14 Astrophytum capricorne 15 Astrophytum capricorne (spineless) 12 16 Astrophytum capricorne x ‘Superkabuto’ 12 16 Astrophytum caput-medusae 20 25 Astrophytum coahuilense 14 16 Astrophytum myriostigma fma 12 quadricostatum Astrophytum myriostigma fma 15 20 tricostatum Astrophytum myriostigma cv ‘Onzuka’ 20 25 Astrophytum hybrids A asterias x (A. coahuilense x 20 ‘Superkabuto) A. capricorne v. niveum (W-S) 15 x A. asterias cv. ‘Superkabuto’ (A. cap. x ‘Superkabuto’) 15 x (A. coahuilense x ‘Superkabuto’) A. coahuilense 15 x A. asterias cv. ‘Superkabuto’ Astrophytum myriostigma cv ‘Onzuka’ 15 20 x A. coahuilense Copiapoa serpentisulcata 12 Discocactus araneispinus 12 Discocactus boomianus 12 Discocactus zehntneri 12 Echinocereus rigidissimus ssp. rubrispinus 12 Escobaria minima 8 Mammillaria hernandezii 15 1 Plant Name 2” 2.5” 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 5 cm 6.3 cm 7.5 cm 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Notocactus uebelmannianus (yellow fl) 10 14 Notocactus uebelmannianus (yellow x purple fl) 10 Parodia horstii 8 Turbincarpus beguinii ssp. beguinii 10 14 Turbinicarpus lophophoroides 10 Turbinicarpus macrochele ssp. polaskii 10 14 Turbinicarpus pseudopectinatus 15 20 v. jarmilae (rubriflorus) Turbinicarpus swobodae 10 14 Turbinicarpus viereckii 13 Uebelmannia buiningi 35 45 2 2” 3’ 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10” 5 cm 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm Plant Name pot cm pot pot pot pot pot pot Pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Adenia repanda (caudex) 9 12 Adenia subsessilifolia (caudex) 15 Adenium arabicum (caudex) 8 12 Adenium boehmianum (caudex) 35 Adenium boehmianum x A. swazicum (caudex) 12 Adenium hybrids 6 10 14 18 Adromischus marianiae ‘herrei’ 25 (Kommagas) Adromischus triflorus 5 Aeonium ‘Sunburst’ 6 Aeonium ‘Sunburst’ crestata 8 Aeonium ‘Sunshine’ 10 Aeonium ‘Velour’ 8 12 Agave americana mediopicta Alba 10 Agave ‘Cornelius’ variegated 10 16 20 Agave desmetiana cv ‘Joe Hoak’ 12 (variegated) Agave ferdinand-regis 12 Agave flexispina 8 Agave geminiflora 10 Agave hartmannii 12 Agave parryi v. patonii 8 Agave parryi v truncata 12 16 Agave parviflora 8 Agave parviflora spp flexiflora 8 Agave potatorum Kichiokan variegate 14 17 20 23 Agave schottii 12 Agave verschaffeltii 12 Agave victoriae-reginae ornatum 6 10 Agave victoriae-reginae v. nickelsii 10 Agave victoriae-reginae variegate 10 ‘Golden Princess’ Alluaudiopsis marneriana (caudex) 8 12 Aloe aristata 6 Aloe brevifolia 6 Aloe haworthioides 4 Aloe jucunda 4 Aloe ‘Little Dainty’ 4 Aloe longistyla 10 Aloe ‘Peacock’ 5 Aloe plicatilis 12 Aloe Quicksilver 4 6 Aloe ‘Quicksilver’ x ‘Doran Black’ 4 6 Aloe ‘Silver Cloud’ 6 Aloe sladeniana x A aristata 6 Aloe ‘Sparkling Burgundy’ 5 7 Alluaudia procera 8 12 Anacampseros crinita 6 Anacampseros marlothii 6 10 16 Anacampseros retusa 8 3 2” 3’ 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10” 5 cm 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm Plant Name pot cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Avonia recurvata ssp buderiana 10 Begonia dregei (caudex) 8 Brachystelma barberae (caudex) 25 Bursera fagaroides (pachycaul) 8 12 Calibanus hookeri (caudex) 13 18 25 33 50 Ceropegia linearis ssp debilis (caudex) 6 Ceropegia linearis ssp woodii (caudex) Clone A 6 Ceropegia linearis ssp woodii (caudex) Clone B 6 Ceropegia ‘Rothii’ 8 Ceropegia stapeliiformis ssp. serpentina 8 Cissus tuberosa (caudex) 8 Coccinia sessilifolia (caudex) 8 Corallocarpus welwitschii (caudex) 9 Crassula argentea variegata 5 Crassula ‘Isabella’ 5 7 Crassula namaquensis 5 8 Cyanotis sp 6 9 Dioscorea mexicana (caudex) 8 Dorstenia foetida (caudex) 6 Dorstenia hildebrandtii v. schlecteri (caudex) 6 Echeveria ‘Agavmin’ 4 Echeveria ‘Bacarus’ (caruncles) 8 12 Echeveria ‘Big Red’ 5 Echeveria ‘Black Prince’ 4 Echeveria ‘Captain Nemo’ 4 Echeveria ‘Easter Bonnet’ 6 Echeveria ‘Fire Ball’ 4 6 Echeveria gibbiflora 4 6 8 Echeveria ‘Ginmei-Tennyo’ 4 7 Echeveria ‘Gypsy’ 4 Echeveria ‘Katella IV’ 4 6 Echeveria ‘Lemon Twist’ 4 6 Echeveria ‘Lola’ 4 Echeveria ‘Mander’s Hybrid’ 4 Echeveria ‘Marcus’ 4 Echeveria ‘Mary Butterfield’ 6 Echeveria ‘Mauna Loa’ (caruncles) 6 12 Echeveria ‘Paul Bunyan’ (caruncles) 6 12 Echeveria ‘Pinkie’ (Flore’s hybrid) 4 Echeveria ‘Rosa Lee’ 5 Echeveria ‘Rosea Grandis’ 4 Echeveria runyonii 4 Echeveria ‘Santa Barbara’ 4 6 8 Echeveria ‘Scopulorum’ 5 7 Echeveria spectabilis 4 Echeveria ‘stolonifera’ 4 Echeveria ‘Texas Rose’ 4 4 2“ 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10” 5 cm 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm Plant Name pot cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Echeveria ‘Tina’ 4 Echeveria ‘Zipper’ 4 Euphorbia ambovombensis (caudex) 8 Euphorbia bupleurifolia (caudex) 15 Euphorbia capsaintemariensis (caudex) 9 Euphorbia clandestina 7 10 14 Euphorbia francoisii (caudex) 12 Euphoribia geroldii 6 9 Euphorbia gorgonis (caudex) 6 9 12 Euphorbia inermis 8 Euphorbia obesa 12 16 Euphorbia primulifolia (caudex) 15 Euphorbia rossii (caudex) 7 10 Euphorbia sakarahaensis (caudex) 7 10 Euphorbia stellata (caudex) 8 Euphorbia stellata x knuthii (caudex) 10 14 Euphorbia valida 9 12 Euphorbia ‘Volkmannii’ (caudex) 10 14 Fouquieria diguetii (pachycaul) 7 10 Gasteroloe ‘Etwin’ 4 Gasteraloe ‘El Supremo’ 4 Gasteraloe ‘Thias’ 4 Gasteria carinata 4 6 Gasteria ellaphiae 5 7 Gasteria gracilis 4 6 Gasteria ‘Little Brother’ 4 Gasteria ‘Little Warty’ 5 8 Gasteria ‘Silver Toad’ 5 Gasteria ‘Shimanu Fuji’ variegated 6 Graptopetalum mendozae 4 Graptopetalum superbum 4 Graptoveria ‘Acaulis’ 4 6 Graptoveria ‘Augusta’ 4 Graptoveria ‘Crystal’ 4 Graptoveria ‘Fanfare’ 4 6 Graptoveria ‘Fred Ives’ 4 6 Graptoveria ‘Gilva’ 4 8 Graptoveria ‘Margaret Reppin’ 4 6 Graptoveria ‘Marpin’ 4 6 Graptoveria ‘Norma’ 5 8 Graptoveria ‘Purple Delight’ 4 Graptoveria ‘Richard Huth’ 4 Haworthia attenuata v. clariperla 4 Haworthia attenuata ‘Korea’ 5 Haworthia ‘Cat’s Tongue’ 15 Haworthia cymbiformis variegata (Clone #1) 6 Haworthia cymbiformis variegata (Clone #2) 6 Haworthia ‘Dark Giant’ 10 Haworthia ‘Dark Joy’ 10 Haworthia ‘Fingers’ 10 5 2” 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10” Plant Name 5 cm 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm pot cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Haworthia luteo-rosea 5 Haworthia marumiana v. batesiana variegate 6 Haworthia ‘Mia’ 15 Haworthia nigra 7 Haworthia retusa ‘Grey Ghost’ 5 Haworthia ‘Sizunami’ 15 Haworthia ‘Slices’ 10 Haworthia turgida v longibracteata 4 Haworthia turgida v suberecta 4 Haworthia tessellata 5 Haworthia truncata ‘Lime Green’ 15 Haworthia truncata x asperula 4 7 (5 different clones) Haworthia venosa ssp tesselata cv ‘Silver Leaf’ 5 Haworthia venosa ssp tesselata cv ‘Neat’ 7 Huernia ‘Dark Knight’ 10 Huernia erinacea (asclepiad) 6 Huernia hystrix v. hystrix 6 Huernia recondita 6 Huernia‘Sunset’ 10 Huernia ‘Tawny’ 10 Huernia thuretii (Bathurst) 8 Huernia whitesloaneana 7 Ipomoea digitata (caudex) 12 Ipomoea platensis (caudex) 12 Jatropha podagrica (pachycaul) 6 9 25 40 Kalanchoe humilis 6 Kalanchoe millotii 4 Kalanchoe synsepala 7 Kalanchoe synsepala ‘Oakleaf’ 7 10 Kalanchoe synsepala ssp.dissecta 7 Kalanchoe tomentosa 5 Kalanchoe tomentosa ‘Chocolate Panda’ 7 Kedrostis africana (caudex) 8 12 Kedrostis hirtella (caudex) 8 Lithops pseudotruncatella v. archerae 5 Mirabilis jalapa (caudex) 8 Monadenium coccineum (caudex) 9 Monadenium guentheri 7 Monadenium invenustum (caudex) 7 Monadenium rubellum (caudex) 9 Monadenium stolonifera (caudex) 8 Monadenium yattanum (caudex) 7 Monsonia crassicaule (pachycaul) 9 Pachyphytum ‘Dr Cornelius’ 4 Pachyphytum linguifolium 4 Pachyphytum oviferum 5 Pachypodium bispinosum 12 Pachypodium densiflorum 8 6 2” 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10 Plant Name 5 cm 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm pot cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Pachypodium eburneum 14 Pachypodium gracilius 12 Pachypodium horombense 8 12 35 Pachypodium inopinatum 10 14 Pachypodium lamerei 12 15 20 25 30 Pachypodium makayense 12 16 Pachypodium rosulatum 8 12 Pachypodium saundersii 5 9 12 16 21 25 39 40 Pachyveria ‘Dr Huth’s Bronze’ 4 Pachyveria ‘Supreme’ 4 6 Pelargonium laxum (pachycaul) 7 10 Pelargonium luridum (pachycaul) 7 Plectranthus pentheri (caudex) 8 Sansevieria abyssinica 6 Sansevieria aethiopica 8 Sansevieria ballyi 6 8 Sansevieria 'Bantel's Sensation' 10 Sanseveria canaliculata 8 Sansevieria concinna 7 Sansevieria cylindrica v. cylindrica 8 Sansevieria elliptica 10 Sansevieria fischeri 8 Sansevieria ‘Flame’ 10 Sansevieria forskaoliana 7 10 Sansevieria grandis 7 Sansevieria hallii R8881 12 Sansevieria kirkii v. kirkii 10 Sansevieria kirkii v. pulchra ‘Coppertone’ 12 Sansevieria liberica 7 Sansevieria masoniana 10 Sansevieria nitida 10 Sansevieria parva 6 Sansevieria patens 8 Sansevieria phillipsiae 8 Sansevieria roxburghiana 8 Sansevieria scimitariformis R944 12 Sansevieria sinus-simiorum R2301 12 Sansevieria stuckyi 10 Sansevieria ‘Tom Thumb’ 7 Sansevieria trifasciata 'Craigii' (variegated) 20 Sansevieria trifasciata ‘Hahnii Streaker’ 6 Sansevieria trifasciata ‘Silver Hahnii’ 7 Sansevieria trifasciata ‘Silver Streak’ 10 Sansevieria zeylanica 8 Sedeveria 4 Sedeveria ‘Golden Goddess’ 4 Sedeveria ‘Paddy Peate’ 4 6 Sedum adolphi 4 Sedum clavatum 4 Sedum ‘Frosty’ 5 7 2” 3” 4” 5” 6” 7” 8” 9” 10” 5 7.5 10 cm 12 cm 15 cm 17 cm 20 cm 22 cm 25 cm Plant Name cm cm pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot pot $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Sempervivum ‘Pacific Red Rose’ 5 Senecio mweroensis ssp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LIV (2003) Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LIV (2003)
    ISSN 0486-4271 IOS Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LIV (2003) Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LIV (2003) Index nominum novarum plantarum succulentarum anno MMIII editorum nec non bibliographia taxonomica ab U. Eggli et D. C. Zappi compositus. International Organization for Succulent Plant Study Internationale Organisation für Sukkulentenforschung December 2004 ISSN 0486-4271 Conventions used in Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum — Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum attempts to list, under separate headings, newly published names of succulent plants and relevant literature on the systematics of these plants, on an annual basis. New names noted after the issue for the relevant year has gone to press are included in later issues. Specialist periodical literature is scanned in full (as available at the libraries at ZSS and Z or received by the compilers). Also included is information supplied to the compilers direct. It is urgently requested that any reprints of papers not published in readily available botanical literature be sent to the compilers. — Validly published names are given in bold face type, accompanied by an indication of the nomenclatu- ral type (name or specimen dependent on rank), followed by the herbarium acronyms of the herbaria where the holotype and possible isotypes are said to be deposited (first acronym for holotype), accord- ing to Index Herbariorum, ed. 8 and supplements as published in Taxon. Invalid, illegitimate, or incor- rect names are given in italic type face. In either case a full bibliographic reference is given. For new combinations, the basionym is also listed. For invalid, illegitimate or incorrect names, the articles of the ICBN which have been contravened are indicated in brackets (note that the numbering of some regularly cited articles has changed in the Tokyo (1994) edition of ICBN).
    [Show full text]
  • The Huntington Botanical Gardens) Who Was Employed at the UC Garden at the Time
    June 30, 2005 Gary Lyons, Editor-in-Chief Joanne Gram, Editor Welcome to The Jumping Cholla. Click on the titles below to go directly to each article, or simply read the articles in order by scrolling down. Most photos may be viewed in a larger size if you click on them. When you want to return to the newsletter, just click on your Back button. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to email the editors by clicking on their names above. That will open a blank email pre-addressed to them. Contents Yuccas in the Huntington Desert Garden Milieu The Weird and Wonderful Boojum Tree, Fouquieria columnaris, and its Relatives Curator’s Comments New Additions to the Huntington's Website and a Little Desert Collections History Yuccas in the Huntington Desert Garden Milieu by Gary Lyons, Curator of the Desert Garden The spiky-leaved yuccas are among the oldest plants in the Huntington landscape. Plantings dating back to 1908 and still thriving give the garden much of its character. Their bright festive panicles of white blossoms add a cheery background and accent to the symphony of spring color in the lower Desert Garden. According to the latest authorities there are 45 yucca species and 14 varieties and they are placed in the agave family. Most of the species are found in the Southwest, northern and central Mexico and Baja California. But the genus is more widespread with species found along the Atlantic seaboard, the Great Plains, into Canada, and south as far as Guatemala. Yucca blossoms, with the exception of at least one species (the rose-tinged Yucca endlichiana) are mostly creamy white.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpted From
    Excerpted from © by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. May not be copied or reused without express written permission of the publisher. click here to BUY THIS BOOK CHAPTER ›3 ‹ ROOT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION Joseph G. Dubrovsky and Gretchen B. North Introduction Structure Primary Structure Secondary Structure Root Types Development and Growth Indeterminate Root Growth Determinate Root Growth Lateral Root Development Root System Development Adaptations to Deserts and Other Arid Environments Root Distribution in the Soil Environmental Effects on Root Development Developmental Adaptations Water and Mineral Uptake Root Hydraulic Conductivity Mineral Uptake Mycorrhizal and Bacterial Associations Carbon Relations Conclusions and Future Prospects Literature Cited rocky or sandy habitats. The goals of this chapter are to re- Introduction view the literature on the root biology of cacti and to pres- From the first moments of a plant’s life cycle, including ent some recent findings. First, root structure, growth, and germination, roots are essential for water uptake, mineral development are considered, then structural and develop- acquisition, and plant anchorage. These functions are es- mental adaptations to desiccating environments, such as pecially significant for cacti, because both desert species deserts and tropical tree canopies, are analyzed, and finally and epiphytes in the cactus family are faced with limited the functions of roots as organs of water and mineral up- and variable soil resources, strong winds, and frequently take are explored. 41 (Freeman 1969). Occasionally, mucilage cells are found in Structure the primary root (Hamilton 1970).Figure3.1nearhere: Cactus roots are less overtly specialized in structure than Differentiation of primary tissues starts soon after cell are cactus shoots.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Monthly Report
    June 2019 Monthly Report The June monthly report makes for a lot of interesting reading with many activities taking place that kept the Rangers on their toes. The report provides the usual monthly compliance statistics including the discovery of snares, followed by a report back on the Voortrekkers annual visit, activities surround alien plant control and fuel load reduction, maintenance and some interesting wildlife highlights from the month. This report then details an alien biomass expo the Rangers attended, the very intriguing washout of a rare beaked whale and the Conservancy’s involvement therein, a conversation piece on Haworthia conservation and the release of a lesser Flamingo. The report is then concluded with the Capped Wheatear which features as this month’s monthly species profile. Plough snails enjoying their jellyfish feast. ‘If we knew how many species we’ve already eradicated, we might be more motivated to protect those that still survive. This is especially relevant to the large animals of the oceans.’ – Yuval Noah Harari 2 JUNE 2019 Compliance Management Marine Living Resources Act During June, a total of 24 recreational fishing, spearfishing and bait collecting permits were checked by Taylor, Kei and Daniel. Of the 24 permits checked, 6 people (25%) failed to produce a valid permit and were issued a verbal warning. Snares On the 3rd of June the Rangers came across some very rudimentary snares whilst checking some of the woodcutting operations on Fransmanshoek. Old packing strapping was used to create snares and were found tied to the base of bushes with a simple noose knot made at the other end.
    [Show full text]
  • Ist Astrophytum Coahuilense Ein Naturhybrid? 37
    M6000E Heft 2 Februar 1993 Kakten Jahrgang 44 und andere Sukkulenten Kakteen und andere Sukkulenten Monatlich erscheinendes Organ der als Herausgeber genannten Gesellschaften Heft 2 • Februar 1993 • Jahrgang 44 • ISSN 0022 7846 Zum Titelbild: Astrophytum coahuilense (Moeller) Kayser gehört zu den interessantesten Pflanzen innerhalb der morphologisch so variablen Gattung Astrophytum Lemaire. Es ähnelt einerseits in der äußeren Wuchsform genau Astrophytum myriostigma Lemaire: wie dieses besitzt es meist fünf Rippen und ist dicht mit weißen Wollflocken bedeckt. Sobald jedoch die prächtigen, großen Blüten erscheinen wird andererseits klar, daß eine enge Verwandtschaft zu Astrophytum capricorne (Dietrich) Britton & Rose bestehen muß. Sie sind im Schlund orange bis tiefrot gefärbt und bei Befruchtung entwickelt sich eine purpur-violette, samenreiche Frucht. Die überraschende Mischung der vegetativen und generativen Merkmale bei Astrophytum coahuilense aus den Astrophytum-Linien des südlichen und nördlichen mexikanischen Hochlandes ist auch der Grund für einen noch heute andauernden Meinungsunterschied, wie diese schönen Pflanzen taxonomisch oder in ihrer evolutiven Entwicklung einzustufen sind. Einen Lösungsvor­ schlag hierzu finden Sie in einem Beitrag auf Seite 37. Astrophytum coahuilense sollte man an einem sonnigen Platz pflegen und von April bis Oktober maßvoll wässern. Ein rein mineralisches Substrat, wie beispielsweise Ziegelsplitt mit Sand gemischt, bietet dann nach trockener Überwinterung um 15-20°C die optimalen Voraussetzungen für regelmäßige Blüten während der sommerlichen Wachtumszeit. Heinz Hoock Foto: Josef Busek Inhalt: Erstbeschreibung Werner Rauh Euphorbia subpeltatophylla - eine bemerkenswerte Art aus Madagaskar 25 Artenschutz Hans Joachim Hilgert Neues vom Washingtoner Artenschutz-Übereinkommen 28 Aus der Praxis Rolf Pinter " Exotisches" Frühbeet ohne sichtbaren Platzmangel 29 In Kultur beobachtet Josef Prantner Lobivia formosa 30 Aus anderen Fachzeitschriften Klaus J.
    [Show full text]
  • Plethora of Plants - Collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse Succulents
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 27 No 2 407-420* ZAGREB December 31, 2018 professional paper/stručni članak – museum collections/muzejske zbirke DOI 10.20302/NC.2018.27.28 PLETHORA OF PLANTS - COLLECTIONS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB (2): GLASSHOUSE SUCCULENTS Dubravka Sandev, Darko Mihelj & Sanja Kovačić Botanical Garden, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 9a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Plethora of plants – collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse succulents. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407- 420*, 2018, Zagreb. In this paper, the plant lists of glasshouse succulents grown in the Botanical Garden from 1895 to 2017 are studied. Synonymy, nomenclature and origin of plant material were sorted. The lists of species grown in the last 122 years are constructed in such a way as to show that throughout that period at least 1423 taxa of succulent plants from 254 genera and 17 families inhabited the Garden’s cold glass- house collection. Key words: Zagreb Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, historic plant collections, succulent col- lection Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Obilje bilja – zbirke Botaničkoga vrta Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (2): Stakleničke mesnatice. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407-420*, 2018, Zagreb. U ovom članku sastavljeni su popisi stakleničkih mesnatica uzgajanih u Botaničkom vrtu zagrebačkog Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta između 1895. i 2017. Uređena je sinonimka i no- menklatura te istraženo podrijetlo biljnog materijala. Rezultati pokazuju kako je tijekom 122 godine kroz zbirku mesnatica hladnog staklenika prošlo najmanje 1423 svojti iz 254 rodova i 17 porodica.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wonderful World of Cacti. July 7, 2020
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulents part 1: The wonderful world of cacti. July 7, 2020 Betzy Rivera. Master Gardener Volunteer OSU Extension – Franklin County OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulent plants Are plants with parts that are thickened and fleshy, capacity that helps to retain water in arid climates. Over 25 families have species of succulents. The most representative families are: Crassulaceae, Agavaceae, Aizoaceae, Euphorbiacea and Cactaceae. 2 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family is endemic to America and the distribution extends throughout the continent from Canada to Argentina, in addition to the Galapagos Islands and Antilles Most important centers of diversification (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Arias-Montes, 1993; Anderson, 2001; Guzmán et al., 2003; Ortega- Baes & Godínez-Alvarez, 2006 3 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION There is an exception — one of the 1,800 species occurs naturally in Africa, Sri Lanka, and Madagascar Rhipsalis baccifera 4 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family includes between ~ 1,800 and 2,000 species whose life forms include climbing, epiphytic, shrubby, upright, creeping or decumbent plants, globose, cylindrical or columnar in shape (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 5 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Cacti are found in a wide variety of environments, however the greatest diversity of forms is found in arid and semi-arid areas, where they play an important role in maintaining the stability of ecosystems (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 6 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family are dicotyledonous plants 2 cotyledons Astrophytum myriostigma (common names: Bishop´s cap cactus, bishop’s hat or miter cactus) 7 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION General Anatomy of a Cactus Cactus spines are produced from specialized structures called areoles, a kind of highly reduced branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Map for the Riversdale Domain
    VEGETATION MAP FOR THE RIVERSDALE DOMAIN Project Team: Jan Vlok, Regalis Environmental Services, P.O. Box 1512, Oudtshoorn, 6620. Riki de Villiers, CapeNature, Private Bag X5014, Stellenbosch, 7599. Date of report: March 2007 Suggested Reference to maps and report: Vlok, J.H.J. & de Villiers, M.E. 2007. Vegetation map for the Riversdale domain. Unpublished 1:50 000 maps and report supported by CAPE FSP task team and CapeNature. 2 Dedication: For Anne Lise, my dear wife, who motivated so strongly for this study to be done. I sincerely hope that this work will enable her, current and future CapeNature colleagues to contribute more towards the conservation and sustainable use of the biodiversity of the rather remarkable biodiversity of the Riversdale region. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The vegetation of a circa 800 000 ha area in the Riversdale region of the southern Cape was classified and mapped at a scale of 1:50 000 for the CAPE Fine-Scale Conservation Plan task team. The vegetation was mapped as their occurrence was perceived to be in the 17th century, thus before any transformation due to European impacts. The classification system follows a six-tier hierarchy in order to facilitate analyses at biome, habitat type and vegetation unit level. Aquatic and terrestrial systems are recognized, with two biomes within aquatic ecosystems and five biomes within the terrestrial ecosystems. Aquatic ecosystems cover approximately 12 percent of the domain and terrestrial ecosystems 88 percent. At habitat level, 47 habitat types are recognized; six are within the aquatic ecosystems and 41 in the terrestrial ecosystems. Brief descriptions and a photograph are provided for each habitat type.
    [Show full text]
  • Haworthia ×Subattenuata 'Kinjoh' by Mr Shinnosuke Matsuzawa and Published in the Catalogue of Yokohama-Ueki 1925
    Haworthia ×subattenuata ‘Kinjoh’ Contents Some Observations on Roots. Harry Mays, UK. ................................................................................................. 2-5 Aloe mossurilensis Ellert, sp. nov. Anthon Ellert, USA ........................................................................................ 6 Cultivar publication dates ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Haworthia ×subattenuata ‘Kinjoh’. Mays-Hayashi, Japan ............................................................... Front cover,6 Bruce Bayer’s Haworthia. Update 5 ........................................................................................................................ 7 White Widows and their Common-Law Hubbies. Steven A. Hammer, USA .................................................. 8-9 Rick Nowakowski - Natures Curiosity Shop. ....................................................................................................... 10 Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum (The Rep), offer David Hunt, UK ..................................................... 10 Two Japanese Cultivars Distributed by Rick Nowakowski. ................................................................................ 11 ×Gasteraloe ‘Green Ice’. David Cumming ........................................................................................ Back cover,11 Index of plant names Volume 9 (2009) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RMB-439 C-Formato.Indd
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 163- 175, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2010.001.186 Is geographical rarity frequent among the cacti of the Chihuahuan Desert? ¿Es la rareza geográfi ca frecuente entre las cactáceas del Desierto Chihuahuense? Héctor M. Hernández*, Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa and Gibrán Hoffmann Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-233, 04510 Mexico D. F., Mexico. *Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. With the aim of assessing the extent of geographical rarity of Mexican Cactaceae, we calculated the distribution size (area of occupancy) of 142 species from the Chihuahuan Desert. In addition, using 2 variables (number of localities and range size), we preliminarily assessed their conservation status using the current IUCN Red List criteria. The results showed enormous variation in the areas of occupancy, although from the biogeographic and conservation perspective the most exceptional group comprises the extremely narrow endemics (42 species), whose range is restricted to areas smaller than 10 km2. Our results reinforce the reputation of this plant family as exceptionally rare geographically. We suggest that geographical rarity of Cactaceae in the Chihuahuan Desert is a natural phenomenon; however, we propose that the range of several species has been infl uenced by human activities. Regarding the conservation status of the species, 75 of them are categorized as Least concern. The remaining 67 species (47.2%) fall in 1 of the 3 categories of threat (27 Vulnerable, 11 Endangered, and 29 Critically endangered). These fi gures confi rm the critical conservation status of Mexican Cactaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the TAXONOMY of CACTACEAE JUSS by the EVIDENCE of SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY and SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F
    European Journal of Botany, Plant Sciences and Phytology Vol.2, No.3, pp.1-15, October 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) ON THE TAXONOMY OF CACTACEAE JUSS BY THE EVIDENCE OF SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY AND SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F. Shalabi Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. ABSTRACT Numerical classification of 16 taxa of Cactaceae was studied using combination of micromorphological characters of seeds (using L.M and SEM) and SDS- PAGE analysis. Aspects of seed micromorphology and seed protein variation as defined were recorded and scored comparatively for the OTU's into a data matrix. Phenetic relationships of these taxa were established based on UPGMA-clustering method by using Jaccard coefficient of the NTSYS-pc 2.2 program. The results were compatible with the traditional relationships of some taxa as the split-off of Opuntia humifusa and Astrophytum myriostigma, at separate lines, these results are compatible with their placement in tribes Opuntieae (subfamily Opuntioideae) and Cacteae (Subfamily cactoideae) respectively, at the time, the placement of three taxa Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa, Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 1, and Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 2 together, the clustering of Hylocereus triangularis and Neobuxbaumia euphorbioides together at a unique tribe Phyllocacteae. The findings contradict in a number of cases the traditional studies, as the grouping of Trichocereus vasquezii with the two represents of genus Parodia despite of their placement in different tribes. KEYWORDS: Cactaceae, SDS-PAGE, Seed micromorpgology, SEM INTRODUCTION The Cactaceae are an exciting and problematic group of plants because of their varied morphology, succulence, and their showy flowers (Barthlott and Hunt 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem Child of Taxonomy by Bruce Bayer
    TOP LEFT and RIGHT: Species show variability among populations as these two Haworthia retusa ‘turgida’ plants from Slangriver Heidelberg demonstrate. BELOW RIGHT: Haworthia retusa 'turgida' from Albertinia. Haworthia BELOW LEFT: Haworthia retusa ‘retusa’ from Riversdale. The problem child of taxonomy by Bruce Bayer y experience with Haworthia dates back to my childhood and spans nearly 70 years of continuous observation. My interest Mwas only able to properly manifest when I began work at the Karoo National Botanical Garden in 1969 and it has since been through many phases. I wrote a formal taxonomic revision of the genus in 1999 and have spent a good bit of the last nine years adding to and verifying what I wrote. Haworthia has always been regarded as a problem child of botany, to be avoided by professional taxonomists for various reasons including an apparent phobia of the many amateur collectors peering over the shoulder while at work. This has puzzled me because it seemed to me genera of the Alooideae (a sub-family) of the Asphodelaceae (the aloe that if the need for good classification and identification was so strong family) are not comfortably classified and the three sets of plants that there was an obligation for botanists to provide the service. So my constitute the genus Haworthia are not only florally distinctive, they involvement has been largely by default. are also phytogeographically and behaviourally different. Thus while I was trained in an agricultural and entomological tradition with a there is this huge flaw at the generic level, can sense ever reign at the totally different and unsophisticated approach to things like taxonomy, species level? The proliferation and confusion of names, coupled with the systematics and nomenclature.
    [Show full text]