DOCSLIB.ORG

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 MARCH 1981 Limited Distribution Class IV orgs and above, qualified to deliver HRD training. HUBBARD HAPPINESS RUNDOWN AUDITOR COURSE NAME: DATE: DATE STARTED: DATE COMPLETED: PREREQUISITES: Class 1 auditor or above, Purification Rundown done, Objectives or SRD done. LENGTH OF COURSE: 2 weeks full time PURPOSE: The purpose of this course is to train an auditor thoroughly in the basics of auditing and on the Happiness Rundown. STUDY TECH: Full use of all Study Tech is required during this course. No going by misunderstood words; no Verbal Tech; study for application; demonstration and clay demos of important principles and drilling of processes/commands, all are required. CERTIFICATE: The graduate is awarded the certificate of HUBBARD HAPPINESS RUNDOWN AUDITOR (PROVISIONAL). BASIC REFERENCES: The student is required to own his own copies of the HRD course pack, the tapes and the booklet, “The Way to Happlness”, as these materials will be needed after the course as well as during the course. 0. INTRODUCTION 1. TAPE: 8103C10 INTRODUCTION TO THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN COURSE by Senior C/S International. _________ A. ORIENTATION 1. HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KSW Series 1 Reiss. 27.8 80 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING _________ 2. Demo: Demonstrate why constructive ideas seldom get group agreement. _________ 3. HCO PL 17 Jun 70R KSW Series 5 Rev. 9.4.77 URGENT AND IMPORTANT Reiss. 30.8.80 TECHNICAL DEGRADES _________ 4. HCO B 22 Jan 77 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT _________ 5. HCO B 13 Sep 65 OUT TECH AND HOW TO GET IT IN _________ 6. Demo: Demonstrate what a skilled auditor applies the Tech to. _________ 7. HCO B 21 Sep 65 OUT TECH _________ 8. HCO B 9 Feb 79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH _________ 9. HCO B 15 Feb 79 VERBAL TECH: PENALTIES _________ 10. Demo: Show how a technical interpretation could be imparted under the guise of “giving a checkout”. _________ B. STUDY TECH 1. HCO B 13 Oct 79 CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING _________ 2. Drill: Clear a word (Any word) until you understand it conceptually. _________ 3. HCO B 14 May 80 DEMONSTRATIONS 4. HCO PL 4 Apr 72R ETHICS AND STUDY TECH _________ Iss III Rev. 21.6.75 5. HCO PL 24 Sep 64 INSTRUCTION AND EXAMINATION RAISING THE STANDARD OF _________ 6. HCO PL 4 Oct 64 THEORY CHECKOUT DATA _________ Reiss. 21.5.67 7. Drill: Check your twin out on the above issue. _________ 8. HCO PL 19 Aug 79R HIGH CRIME - ADDITION Rev. 30.6.80 HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS AND WORD CLEARING _________ 9. Drill: Do a High Crime checkout on your twin on the above issue, per that issue. _________ 10. HCO B 7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING _________ 11. Drill: Find an actual false datum from your experience in life. Tell it to your twin. _________ C. BASIC AUDITING 1. HCO B 19 Jun 80 THE AUDITOR’S CODE _________ 2. PAB 38, 29 Oct 54 THE AUDITOR’S CODE 1954 _________ 3. PAB 39, 12 Nov 54 THE AUDITOR’S CODE 1954 (Concluded) _________ 4. HCO B 19 Jun 80 THE AUDITOR’S CODE 5. HCO B 16 Aug 71RA TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED Re-revis. 4.9.80 _________ 6. Clay Demo: How the ARC triangle relates to a session. _________ 7. Clay Demo: Axiom 28. _________ 8. Twin checkout on TRs 0-4 section of HCOB 16 Aug 71RA _________ 9. HCO B 18 Apr 80 TR CRITICISM _________ 10. HCO B 23 May 71 COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES Iss X _________ 11. Demo: What happens to a pc if the auditor enters Comm Cycle Additives. _________ 12. Clay Demo: THE AUDITING COMM CYCLE (Ref . Tech Dict.) 13. HCO B 5 Apr 80 Q & A, THE REAL DEFINITION _________ 14. Demo: Q & A. _________ 15. HCO B 23 May 71R THE MAGIC OF THE Rev. 4 Dec 74, Iss I COMMUNICATION CYCLE _________ 16. HCO B 23 May 71R THE TWO PARTS OF AUDITING Rev. 6 Dec 74, Iss II _________ 17. Clay Demo: Show an auditor and pc in communication. _________ 18. Clay Demo: An auditor doing something for the pc. _________ 19. HCO B 23 May 71 THE THREE IMPORTANT Iss III COMMUNICATION LINES _________ 20. Clay Demo: The “Itsa Maker line”. _________ 21. Clay Demo: The “Itsa line”. _________ 22. Clay Demo: The “What’s-it line”. _________ 23. HCO B 23 May 71R COMMUNICATION CYCLES WITHIN Rev. 4.12.74, Iss IV THE AUDITING CYCLE _________ 24. Clay Demo: How the auditor restimulates charge. _________ 25. Clay Demo: How the pc gets rid of the restimulation. _________ 26. Clay Demo: What happens if the pc doesn’t get to answer the question. _________ 27. Demo: Draw all the communication lines out on a scrap of paper (per HCO B 23 May 71R, Iss IV. _________ 28. HCO B 23 May 71R THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE Rev. 29.11.74, Iss V IN AUDITING _________ 29. HCO B 23 May 71 AUDITOR FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND Iss VI _________ 30. Clay Demo: Invalidation (in a session) _________ 31. Clay Demo: Evaluation (in a session) _________ 32. Tape: 6108C29 BASICS OF AUDITING _________ 33. Tape: 6109C05 PRINCIPLES OF AUDITING _________ 34. Tape: 6208C21 BASICS OF AUDITING _________ 35. Tape: 6209C18 DIRECTING PC’S ATTENTION _________ 36. Clay Demo: The meaning of “in-session”. _________ D. RUDIMENTS 1. Clay Demo: The definition of ARC break (Tech Dict). _________ 2. Clay Demo: The definition of PTP (Tech Dict). _________ 3. Clay Demo: The definition of missed withhold (Tech Dict). _________ 4. Clay Demo: The definition of overt (Tech Dict). _________ 5. Clay Demo: The definition of Invalidation. _________ 6. Clay Demo: The definition of Evaluation. _________ 7. Tape: 6411C10 PTPs, OVERTS AND ARC BREAKS _________ 8. HCO B 7 Sep 64 PTPs, OVERTS AND ARC BREAKS Iss II _________ 9. HCO B 4 Apr AD15 ARC BREAKS AND MISSED WITHOLDS _________ 10. Tape: 6101C24 (Presession 38) WITHOLDS AND IN-SESSION-NESS _________ 11. Tape: 6211C01 MISSED MISSED WITHHOLDS _________ 12. Clay Demo: The difference between a withhold and a missed withhold. _________ 13. Clay Demo: What happens if you audit over an ARC break. _________ 14. Clay Demo: What happens if you audit over a PTP. _________ 15. Clay Demo: What happens if you at dit over a M/W/H. _________ 16. HCO B 17 Msr 74 TWC CHECKSHEETS - TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS _________ 17. Clay Demo: “Itsa, earlier Itsa, to F/N” _________ E. FLOATING NEEDLES AND END PHENOMENA 1. HCO B 20 Feb 70 FLOATING NEEDLES AND END PHENOMENA _________ 2. HCO B 21 Mar 74 END PHENOMENA _________ 3. Clay Demo: The end phenomenon of a rudiment. _________ 4. Clay Demo: The end phenomenon of an L1C line. _________ 5. Clay Demo: The end phenomenon of an L1C. _________ 6. Clay Demo: The end phenomenon of a major process. _________ 7. Clay Demo: Overrun of an F/N. _________ 8. Clay Demo: A charged area bypassed. _________ 9. HCO B 18 Mar 74R E-METERS, SENSITIVITY ERRORS Rev. 22.2.79 _________ 10. HCO B 2 Dec 80 FLOATING NEEDLE AND TA POSITION MODIFIED _________ 11. HCO B 8 Oct 70 PERSISTENT F/N _________ 12. HCO B 3 May 80 PC INDICATORS _________ 13. Demo: “Indicator”. _________ F. STRAIGHTWIRE AND VALENCES 1. ABILITY Major 4 STRAIGHTWIRE _________ 2. Article Two of Ability Major 4, “Straightwire”. _________ 3. HCO B 23 May 71R RECOGNITION OF THE RIGHTNESS Rev. 4.12.74 Iss VIII OF THE BEING _________ 4. Clay Demo: Additives to a being. _________ 5. HCO B 2 May 58 BEINGNESS AGAIN _________ 6. Clay Demo: Valence _________ 7. HCO B 29 May 58 STANDARD CLEAR PROCEDURE AND AN EXPERIMENTAL ROAD: CLEARING BY VALENCES _________ 8. Clay Demo: Basic personality. _________ 9. Clay Demo: The adoption of a valence. _________ 10. Demo: The definition of “Valence” from Tech Dictionary (all parts). _________ 11. Clay Demo: Valence closure (Tech Dict). _________ 12. Clay Demo: Valence shlft (Tech Dict). _________ 13. Tape: 5410C07 ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE _________ 14. Tape: 5405C03 VIEWPOINT STRAIGHTWIRE _________ 15. HCO B 18 Nov 59 1ST MELBOURNE ACC MATERIAL _________ 16. Demo: Valence Differentiation. _________ 17. HCO B 29 Jul 80 CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY 18. Demo: The effect on Man of the idea that he is an animal. _________ 19. HCO B 30 Jul 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING _________ 20. HCO B 19 Dec 71 D OF P OPERATES BY OCAs _________ 21. Demo: How removing valences changes the OCA. _________ 22. Clay Demo: The term “Key-In “ (noun, Tech Dict) _________ 23. Clay Demo: The term “Key-Out” (Tech Dict) _________ 24. Clay Demo: How straightwire technique produces a key-out. _________ G. THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN 1. HCO B 24 Nov 80 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN HRD Series #1 _________ 2. HCO B 14 Feb 81 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN, ADMINIS- HRD Series #2 TRATION AND DELIVERY _________ 3. HCO B 12 May 80 DRUGS AND OBJECTIVE PROCESSES _________ 4. Demo: What objective processes do for a person. _________ 5. Booklet: THE WAY TO HAPPINESS. _________ 6. HCO B 16 Feb 81 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN, COMMAND HRD Series #3 SHEETS, page 1 instructions _________ 7. HCO B 9 Aug 78 CLEARING COMMANDS Iss II _________ 8. HCO B 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-METER _________ 9. HCO B 24 Feb 81 HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD HRD Series #4 _________ 10. HCO B 6 Nov AD14 STYLES OF AUDITING _________ 11.
Recommended publications
  • HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

    HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

    HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 JUNE 1961 CenOCon STUDENT SECURITY CHECK (HCO WW Sec Form 5) This is a Processing or a Security Check. As a Processing Check it is given in Model Session. The following Security Check is the only student security check (in addition to the standard Joburg and HCO WW Sec Form 6) to be used in Academies and courses. HCO WW SEC FORM 5 SCIENTOLOGY STUDENTS’ SECURITY CHECK (For Academies, ACCs, etc.) The first few questions below are for a student who has registered, but has not yet started on course, and who has never had a course in Scientology or Dianetics. The whole battery is given to a student actually on course, or who has had a previous course in Scientology, or Dianetics. Has anyone given, or loaned, you money to help cover your tuition, or expenses, while on this course? If so: Have you promised them something in return for this? If so: What exactly have you committed yourself to? If so: Do you intend to make good this obligation? Are you coming on this course in order to get away from someone, or something? Do you have any goal for being on this course which, if achieved, would result in harm to another person, his possessions, or his reputation? Are you here in order to get into anything? Have you promised anyone auditing which you do not intend to give? Have you read, or had read to you, the course Rules and Regulations? If so: Are there any which you do not intend to comply with? Are you here to find out whether Scientology works? Are
  • STUDENT HAT II 10.03.20 A) Table of Contents, in Checksheet Order

    STUDENT HAT II 10.03.20 A) Table of Contents, in Checksheet Order

    SSTTUUDDEENNTT HHAATT Colour, Screen, read only (unsuitable for print) (CS, Colour, Screen Compiled 10. March 2020 STUDENT HAT II 10.03.20 a) Table of Contents, in Checksheet order: 1. 70-10-26 DEFINITION OF A STUDENT .......................................................................................................1 2. 70-10-27 THE INTENTION OF THE STUDENT............................................................................................3 3. 71-06-25 BARRIERS TO STUDY..................................................................................................................5 4. 78-03-23 CLEARING WORDS......................................................................................................................9 5. 79-07-17 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED................................................................................13 6. 81-02-13 DICTIONARIES............................................................................................................................19 7. 81-07-21 WHAT IS A CHECKSHEET .........................................................................................................27 8. 79-08-21 TWINNING...................................................................................................................................31 9. 80-05-14 DEMONSTRATIONS ...................................................................................................................43 10. 72-04-15 DEMONSTRATION......................................................................................................................47
  • L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER of DIANETICS and SCIENTOLOGY Volume POWER & SOLO

    L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER of DIANETICS and SCIENTOLOGY Volume POWER & SOLO

    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY Volume POWER & SOLO CONFIDENTIAL Contents Power Power Processes 19 Power Badges 20 Power Processes 21 Six Power Processes 22 The Standard Flight To Power & VA 23 Gain The Ability To Handle Power 25 The Power Processes 26 Power Process 1AA (Pr Pr 1AA) 32 Power Process 1 (Pr Pr 1) 32 Power Process 2 (Pr Pr 2) 32 Power Process 3 (Pr Pr 3) 32 Power Process 4 (Pr Pr 4) 32 Power Process 5 (Pr Pr 5) 33 Power Process 6 (Pr Pr 6) 33 The Power Processes All Flows 34 Data On Pr Prs 37 End Phenomena And F/ Ns In Power 38 L P - 1 40 Low TA Cases 41 Power Plus 43 Restoring The Knowledge You Used To Have 45 Power Plus Release - 5A Processes 46 Power Plus Processes All Flows 47 Rehab Of VA 48 GPM Research Material 51 Editors Note 53 Routine 3 54 Current Auditing 59 Routine 3M Rundown By Steps 61 Correction To HCO Bulletin Of February 22, 1963 66 R3M Goal Finding By Method B 67 Routine 2 And 3M Correction To 3M Steps 13, 14 68 Vanished RS Or RR 71 The End Of A GPM 74 R2- R3 Corrections Typographicals And Added Notes 79 Routine 3M Simplified 80 R3M2 What You Are Trying To Do In Clearing 89 Routine 3M2 Listing And Nulling 92 Routine 3M2 Corrected Line Plots 96 R3M2 Redo Goals On This Pattern 103 Routine 3M2 Directive Listing 107 Routine 3M2 Handling The GPM 109 Routine 3M2 Tips - The Rocket Read Of A Reliable Item 113 Routine 3 An Actual Line Plot 115 7 Routine 3 Directive Listing Listing Liabilities 120 Routine 3 Correction To HCOB 23 Apr.
  • Contents Qualifications Division 5

    Contents Qualifications Division 5

    CONTENTS QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION 5 (CORRECTION DIVISION) Part 1 FORM, PURPOSES, IDEAL SCENES, PRODUCTS AND STATISTICS 31 July 1965 Purposes of the Qualifications Division 1 30 Sept. 1965 Statistics for Divisions (excerpt: Qual Division 5) 2 Circa 1965 Qualifications Division 5 Org Board Outline 3 20 Nov. 1965 The Promotional Actions of an Organization (excerpt: Qual Division 5) 4 15 Dec. 1965 Additions to "The Promotional Actions of an Organization" si see—4 2 Nov. 1967 Qualifications Division, Departments of Examinations, Review and Certifications and Awards 5 2 Nov. 1967 Chaplain's Section (excerpt) 7 14 Mar. 1968 Policies Governing the Qualifications Division (reissued 8 May 1968) 86 17 June 1968 ARC Break Registrars and Auditors (corrects 2 Nov. 1967) 7 29 Oct. 1968 Stat for Class VIII C/S Qual 7 29 Mar. 1970 Qual Stats Revised (amends 30 Sept. 1965) (excerpt) 8 3 June 1970 Orders to Divisions for Immediate Compliance (excerpt: Division V) 9 17 June 1970 OIC Change-Cable Change (cancels 29 Mar. 1970, amends 30 Sept. 1965) (excerpt) 10 15 July 1970 Reorganization of the Correction Division 11 8 Aug. 1970 Reorganization of the Correction Division (amends 15 July 1970) 14 22 Sept. 1970 Ideal Scenes and Statistics for Correction Division Five 18 5 Feb. 1971 Org Gross Divisional Statistics Revised (excerpt: Qual Division 5) (amends 30 Sept. 1965, 17 June 1970 & 22 Sept. 1970) 22 7 Feb. 1971 FEBC Org Board Division 5 23 2 Aug. 1971 Additional Qual Stat 28 14 Aug. 1971 Div V Mini Qual Org Board (revised 5 Sept. 1971 & 19 Nov.
  • Case 1:15-Cv-00037 Doc #1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#1

    Case 1:15-Cv-00037 Doc #1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#1

    Case 1:15-cv-00037 Doc #1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURT FOR THE WESTERNDISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Civil Action No. LAUREN PREVEC, an Ohio Citizen; JANNETTE PREVEC, an Ohio Citizen; and FRANK PREVEC, an Ohio Citizen, Plaintiff, V. NARCONON FREEDOM CENTER, INC.; ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL; NARCONON EASTERN UNITED STATES; NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, and DOES 1-100, ROE Corporations I - X, inclusive, Defendants. Jeffrey P. Ray (P31098) Attorneys for Plaintiff JEFFREY P. RAY, P.C. 2500 Lake Lansing Road, Suite A Lansing,MI 48912 (517)372-5700 i eff(%Qtisravlaw,com Plaintiffs Lauren Prevec, Jamiette Prevec, and Frank Prevec("Plaintiffs"),through counsel, JEFFREY P. RAY, P.C., allege the following: I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiffs Lauren Prevec, Jannette Prevec, and Frank Prevecwere, and at all relevant times to this Complaint are residents of Ohio. 1 Case 1:15-cv-00037 Doc #1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 14 Page ID#2 2. Defendant Narconon Freedom Center, Inc. (hereafter "NFC"), is, and at all times relevant to this Complaint was, a corporation incorporated under the laws of, and with its principal place of business in, the State of Michigan. NFC has been at all relevant times transacting business in Albion, Michigan. 3. Defendant Narconon International ("NI") is a California coiporation with its headquarters in Los Angeles, California. 4. N1 is the principal and licensor of Defendant NFC. N1 exercises control over the time, manner, and method ofNFC's operations. 5. N1 was doing business in the State of Michigan by and through its agent and licensee Defendant NFC.
  • Benefits I Have Received from Scientology Auditing and Train

    Benefits I Have Received from Scientology Auditing and Train

    14 August 1997 Dear I have been asked to describe certain 'secular' benefits I have received from Scientology auditing and training that are not generally understood to be religious or spiritual in nature and how these have affected my community services activities. From my own schooldays I had a purpose to help other children gain a good education and to this end became a qualified teacher and pursued this profession until I married and had a family. I then came into contact with Scientology and through it gained greater self reliance and greater confidence in handling projects Also I was trained in the use of the study method developed by L Ron Hubbard and decided that I wanted to use it to help children to study better in school. With the help of a local West Indian businessman and other volunteers I started Riving supplementary teaching in the evening to disadvantaged children in Brixton , something which was especially wanted by West Indian parents in the drea. This project which we named B.E.S.T, ( the Basic Education and Supplementary Teaching .Association ) is now an authorised charity and continues to provide supplementary teaching and vacation projects in the Brixton area. More recently I have taken on another volunteer activity, that of bringing this study method to teachers in a country in Southern Africa. The education authorities in that country had become aware that the academic results being achieved in their schools were not sufficiently being translated into success in the professions and the workplace. L Ron Hubbard's Study Technology with its emphasis on fully understanding and being able to apply the data being studied was demonstrated in a pilot project and was shown to markedly increase student interest and comprehension and to greatly reduce truancy and its introduction was approved.
  • Association for Narconon Easter

    Association for Narconon Easter

    Case 1:15-cv-00054 Doc #1 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTMCT OF MICHIGAN Civil Action No. JOSHUA CURREY, a West Virginia Citizen, Plaintiff, V. NARCONON FREEDOM CENTER; ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL; NARCONON EASTERN UNITED STATES; NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, and DOES 1-100, ROE Corporations I - X, inclusive, Defendants. Jeffrey P. Ray (P31098) Attorneys for Plaintiff JEFFREY P. RAY, P.C. 2500 Lake Lansing Road, Suite A Lansing,MI 48912 (517)372-5700 i eff(%otisraylaw. corn Plaintiff Joshua Currey ("Plaintiff"), through counsel, JEFFREY P. RAY, P.C., alleges the following: I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Joshua Currey is, and at all relevant times to this Complaint was, a resident of the State of West Virginia. 2. Defendant Narconon Freedom Center (hereafter "NFC"), is, and at all times relevant to this Complaint was, a corporation incorporated under the laws of, and with its principal place of 1 Case 1:15-cv-00054 Doc #1 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 15 Page ID#2 business in, the State of Michigan. NFC has been at all relevant times transacting business in Albion, Michigan. 3. Defendant Narconon International ("NI") is a California corporation with its headquarters in Los Angeles, California. 4. N1 is the principal and licensor of Defendant NFC. N1 exercises control over the time, manner, and method ofNFC's operations. 5. N1 was doing business in the State of Michigan by and through its agent and licensee Defendant NFC. 6. NFC and N1 are agents of the Association for Better Living and Education ("ABLE").
  • The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L

    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L

    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY Volume VIII 1972-1976 _____________________________________________________________________ I will not always be here on guard. The stars twinkle in the Milky Way And the wind sighs for songs Across the empty fields of a planet A Galaxy away. You won’t always be here. But before you go, Whisper this to your sons And their sons — “The work was free. Keep it so.” L. RON HUBBARD L. Ron Hubbard Founder of Dianetics and Scientology EDITORS’ NOTE “A chronological study of materials is necessary for the complete training of a truly top grade expert in these lines. He can see how the subject progressed and so is able to see which are the highest levels of development. Not the least advantage in this is the defining of words and terms for each, when originally used, was defined, in most cases, with considerable exactitude, and one is not left with any misunderstoods.” —L. Ron Hubbard The first eight volumes of the Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology contain, exclusively, issues written by L. Ron Hubbard, thus providing a chronological time track of the development of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume IX, The Auditing Series, and Volume X, The Case Supervisor Series, contain Board Technical Bulletins that are part of the series. They are LRH data even though compiled or written by another. So that the time track of the subject may be studied in its entirety, all HCO Bs have been included, excluding only those upper level materials which will be found on courses to which they apply.
  • Scientology in Court: a Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion

    Scientology in Court: a Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion

    DePaul Law Review Volume 47 Issue 1 Fall 1997 Article 4 Scientology in Court: A Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion Paul Horwitz Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Paul Horwitz, Scientology in Court: A Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion, 47 DePaul L. Rev. 85 (1997) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol47/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCIENTOLOGY IN COURT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND SOME THOUGHTS ON SELECTED ISSUES IN LAW AND RELIGION Paul Horwitz* INTRODUCTION ................................................. 86 I. THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ........................ 89 A . D ianetics ............................................ 89 B . Scientology .......................................... 93 C. Scientology Doctrines and Practices ................. 95 II. SCIENTOLOGY AT THE HANDS OF THE STATE: A COMPARATIVE LOOK ................................. 102 A . United States ........................................ 102 B . England ............................................. 110 C . A ustralia ............................................ 115 D . Germ any ............................................ 118 III. DEFINING RELIGION IN AN AGE OF PLURALISM
  • The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology

    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology

    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY Volume XIV THE O.T. LEVELS _____________________________________________________________________ I will not always be here on guard. The stars twinkle in the Milky Way And the wind sighs for songs Across the empty fields of a planet A Galaxy away. You won’t always be here. But before you go, Whisper this to your sons And their sons — “The work was free. Keep it so.” L. RON HUBBARD 2 L. RON HUBBARD Founder of Dianetics and Scientology 3 4 CONTENTS 5 Contents ORIGINAL OT 1.......................................................................................................13 OT 1 Checksheet ................................................................................................15 Clear And OT.....................................................................................................16 An Open Letter To All Clears .......................................................................17 Floating Needles ................................................................................................19 OT 1 Instructions ...............................................................................................20 OT 1 Steps..........................................................................................................22 NEW OT 1..................................................................................................................27 New OT 1 Instructions .......................................................................................29
  • Volume 5, Issue 4 July—August 2021

    Volume 5, Issue 4 July—August 2021

    The Journal of CESNUR $ Volume 5, Issue 4 July—August 2021 $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Director-in-Charge | Direttore responsabile Marco Respinti Editor-in-Chief | Direttore Massimo Introvigne Center for Studies on New Religions, Turin, Italy Associate Editor | Vicedirettore PierLuigi Zoccatelli Pontifical Salesian University, Turin, Italy Editorial Board / International Consultants Milda Ališauskienė Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania Eileen Barker London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom Luigi Berzano University of Turin, Turin, Italy Antoine Faivre École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris, France Holly Folk Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, USA Liselotte Frisk (†) Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden J. Gordon Melton Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA Susan Palmer McGill University, Montreal, Canada Stefania Palmisano University of Turin, Turin, Italy Bernadette Rigal-Cellard Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Bordeaux, France Instructions for Authors and submission guidelines can be found on our website at www.cesnur.net. ISSN: 2532-2990 The Journal of CESNUR is published bi-monthly by CESNUR (Center for Studies on New Religions), Via Confienza 19, 10121 Torino, Italy. $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Volume 5, Issue 4, July—August 2021 Contents Articles 3 1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III? Ian C. Camacho 58 Labeling Scientology: “Cult,” “Fringe,” “Extremist,” or Mainstream? Rosita Šorytė 77 The Tai Ji Men Case: A Legal Analysis Chen Tze-Lung, Huang Chun-Chieh, and Wu Ching-Chin $ The Journal of CESNUR $ 1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III? Ian C. Camacho Independent Scholar [email protected] ABSTRACT: Former Scientology archivist and ex-Scientologist Gerald “Gerry” Armstrong asserts that founder L.
  • EXHIBIT 21 6:14-Cv-00187-RAW Documentnarconon 261-21 of Filed Oklahoma in ED/OK on 07/22/14 Page 2 of 10 Executive Directive

    EXHIBIT 21 6:14-Cv-00187-RAW Documentnarconon 261-21 of Filed Oklahoma in ED/OK on 07/22/14 Page 2 of 10 Executive Directive

    6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 261-21 Filed in ED/OK on 07/22/14 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 21 6:14-cv-00187-RAW DocumentNarconon 261-21 of Filed Oklahoma in ED/OK on 07/22/14 Page 2 of 10 Executive Directive NN of Oklahoma ED # 196 May 25, 2002 To: ChiefR egistrar Course NN OK Info: Executive Director NN OK P&CSupNN OK Hatting Officer NN OK Staff Section Officer NN OK From: Qual Sup NN OK Narconon of Oklahoma Division Six B, Department 17B *** ChiefRegistrar *** Full Hat Checksheet DATE= ----~- DATE STARTED: _______ DATE COMPLETED: --- --- Prerequisites: I) Narconon Basic Staff Hat 2) Basic Study Manual Study Tech: Study Tech is to be applied in full throughout this course. The materials are to be studied and drilled in sequence. By initiating the blank after each chccksheet entry, you are attesting that you fully understand and can apply the data. DRILLS AND PRACTICALS ARE TO BE DONE FULLY TO THEIR RESULT. If you are not a fast flow student, you must star-rate check out on all items marked with an asterisk (*). (Ref: HCOB 13 Aug 72RB, Fast Flow Training). Thjs course does not require nvinning. Purpose: To train and hat the Chief Registrar to carry out the duties of the post and get the products of that post. Length of Course: 3 Y2 Weeks part time. Certificate: Narconon Fully Hatted Chief Registrar 6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 261-21 Filed in ED/OK on 07/22/14 Page 3 of 10 2 Product: A Narconon fully hatted Chief Registrar who is capable of effectively and competently producing the products of the post in volume.