Phytochemical Characterization and Sensory Evaluation of Macropiper Excelsum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phytochemical Characterization and Sensory Evaluation of Macropiper Excelsum TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Lebensmitteltechnologie Phytochemical Characterization and Sensory Evaluation of Macropiper excelsum Katja Obst Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt (WZW) der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Schieberle Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Engel 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Hofmann Die Dissertation wurde am 12.05.2014 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt (WZW) am 07.10.2014 angenommen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Professor Dr. Karl-Heinz Engel for his valuable scientific advice, his enlightening comments, and his interest in the progress of my thesis. I would like to show my gratitude to Dr. Gerhard Krammer, Senior Vice President Research & Technology Flavor & Nutrition, for the provision of this fascinating research project and his great interest in my work. This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and help of Dr. Jakob Ley, Director Ingredient Research. I sincerely appreciate his excellent supervision, his ideas and proposals, as well as his encouragement. Thank you also for your confidence in my work and the possibilities to present the results of my thesis to the scientific community in many talks and poster sessions at various meetings. I would like to convey my sincerest gratitude to Dr. Katharina Reichelt, Natural Product Chemistry/Functional Flavor Solutions, for her perpetual help in all phases of this work. I highly appreciate her outstanding enthusiasm and her motivation. Katharina, thank you also very much for the late discussion sessions, your great support during writing up my thesis, and the endless supply of cookies and chocolate. I give my cordial thanks to the team of Symrise Ingredient Research, Petra Hoffmann-Lücke, Maria Blings, and Gisela Kunze, for their helpfulness in the everyday laboratory routine and the enjoyable working atmosphere. I highly appreciate the support of Dr. Michael Backes, his valuable scientific advice concerning synthetic chemistry and the great discussions. My special thanks go to Susanne Paetz and Susanne Mundt for sharing their expert knowledge in sensory analysis and their exceptional assistance in the innumerable tasting sessions. I would also like to thank the flavorists Kathrin Langer, Thomas Riess, and Rüdiger Hupe for their support in sensory evaluation and helpful suggestions during the last three years. Thank you also to Rüdiger Wittlake, Thomas Begemann, and Ingo Eikenberg for carrying out the LC-MS measurements, Regina Beier for her help in preparative HPLC, and Dr. Wiebke Zander and Beate Hartmann for NMR measurement and structure elucidation of the isolated molecules. I highly appreciate the work of Martin Heinemeyer, carrying out the LC Taste® fractionation, and of Stefan Brennecke, who has helped my so many times to get the FCPC running. Special thanks also to Birgit Kohlenberg, Markus Eggers, Lars Grohmann, and Iulia Poplacean for their support in GC and GC-MS analysis. Finally, I would like to thank all panelists who took part in the countless numbers of sensory sessions for their help and endurance. And last but not least, I would like to thank my friends at home, in Holzminden, and from all over Germany who have supported me in so many ways, and my parents for their infinite support, their love and encouragement. Ich bin froh, dass es Euch gibt! TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ..... INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES .............................................. 1 2 ..... BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 4 2.1 MECHANISM OF SENSORY PERCEPTION ............................................ 4 2.1.1 Signal Transduction in Taste Buds and Taste Cells .................................. 5 2.1.2 Structure and Function of Taste Receptors ............................................... 8 2.1.3 Trigeminally Active Compounds .............................................................. 12 2.1.4 Astringency Perception ........................................................................... 16 2.1.5 Reduction of Unpleasant Taste and Flavor ............................................. 19 2.2 PRINCIPLES OF SENSORY ANALYSIS ................................................ 21 2.2.1 Time-Intensity Measurements ................................................................. 22 2.3 MACROPIPER EXCELSUM .................................................................... 23 2.4 EXTRACTION, PURIFICATION AND ISOLATION TECHNIQUES ......... 28 2.4.1 Extraction Techniques - Pressurized Solvent Extraction ......................... 28 2.4.2 Sensory-Guided Analysis ........................................................................ 30 2.4.2.1 Aroma Analysis using Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry (GC-O) ......... 30 2.4.2.2 Taste Analysis ......................................................................................... 32 2.4.3 Fast Centrifugal Partition Chromatography (FCPC) ................................ 35 2.4.3.1 Principle of Countercurrent Chromatography .......................................... 35 2.4.3.2 Selection of Solvent Systems for FCPC .................................................. 39 3 ..... MATERIAL AND METHODS .......................................................... 41 3.1 MATERIAL .............................................................................................. 41 3.1.1 Chemicals ............................................................................................... 41 3.1.2 Plant Material .......................................................................................... 43 3.2 TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................................... 44 3.3 METHODS .............................................................................................. 47 3.3.1 Extraction of Plant Material ..................................................................... 47 3.3.1.1 Preparation of a Pentane/Diethyl Ether Extract of M. excelsum .............. 47 3.3.1.2 Preparation of an Ethanol/Water Extract of M. excelsum ........................ 47 3.3.1.3 Preparation of Extracts using the SpeedExtractor ................................... 47 3.3.2 Methods for Volatile Analysis of the n-Pentane-Diethyl Ether Extract ..... 48 3.3.3 High Temperature Liquid-Chromatographic Separation of the Ethanol/Water Extract ............................................................................. 49 3.3.4 Fast Centrifugal Partition Chromatography ............................................. 49 3.3.4.1 Selection of a Solvent System ................................................................. 49 3.3.4.2 FCPC – Fractionation of the Ethanol/Water Extract of M. excelsum ....... 49 3.3.5 Preparative HPLC ................................................................................... 50 3.3.6 Liquid Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry ........................................ 52 3.3.7 Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry Direct Inlet .......................... 52 3.3.8 Sensory Analysis ..................................................................................... 53 3.3.8.1 General Conditions .................................................................................. 53 3.3.8.2 Sensory Analysis of High-Temperature Liquid-Chromatography Fractions ................................................................................................................. 53 3.3.8.3 Flavor Language ..................................................................................... 54 3.3.8.4 Pre-Tests for Masking Trials .................................................................... 54 3.3.8.5 Intensity Variation Descriptive Methodology (IVDM) ............................... 55 3.3.8.6 Statistical Analysis ................................................................................... 56 4 ..... RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................... 57 4.1 MACROPIPER EXCELSUM .................................................................... 57 4.1.1 Volatile Compounds in M. excelsum ....................................................... 57 4.1.2 Non-Volatile Compounds in M. excelsum ................................................ 60 4.1.2.1 Authentication and Comparison with Piper methysticum ......................... 61 4.1.2.2 Sensory-Guided Analysis of the Non-Volatile Compounds via HTLC ...... 62 4.1.2.3 Identification of Compounds in M. excelsum Extract by Comparison of Reference Molecules ............................................................................... 65 4.1.2.4 Fast Centrifugal Partition Chromatography (FCPC) of M. excelsum Extract ................................................................................................................. 67 4.1.2.5 Isolation of Compounds from FCPC Fractions via Preparative HPLC ..... 70 4.1.2.6 Structure Elucidation of Isolated Compounds via NMR Spectroscopy .... 76 4.1.2.7 Comparison of the Contents of Non-Volatile Comounds in Different Parts of the M. excelsum Plant ....................................................................... 103 4.1.3 Sensory Evaluation of the Compounds Identifid in M. excelsum ........... 106
Recommended publications
  • Hall Road, Kerikeri to Create a Retirement Village with 200 Villas and 76 Aged Care Beds
    ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL VALUES AT 57C HALL ROAD AND 22 LIMELIGHT LANE, KERIKERI Report 2018 268 Prepared for KERIKERI LAND LIMITED NZE Quality System: Document Reference : p:\ Projects\2018 268 Kerikeri Land Report Revision : 2 Report Status : Final Prepared by : Dr Gary Bramley Reviewed by : Tricia Scott Approved by : Tricia Scott Date Created : 3 December 2018 Date Issued : 11 February 2020 Assessment of Ecological Values at 57C Hall Road and 22 Limelight Lane, KERIKERI Prepared for Kerikeri Land Limited TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODS ................................................................................................. 1-4 2. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT AND VALUES................................................................................. 2-5 2.1 ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................... 2-5 2.2 ECOLOGICAL VALUES .................................................................................................. 2-6 2.3 FAUNA VALUES .............................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.1 Aquatic Fauna................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • TRP Mediation
    molecules Review Remedia Sternutatoria over the Centuries: TRP Mediation Lujain Aloum 1 , Eman Alefishat 1,2,3 , Janah Shaya 4 and Georg A. Petroianu 1,* 1 Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates; [email protected] (L.A.); Eman.alefi[email protected] (E.A.) 2 Center for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates 3 Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman 11941, Jordan 4 Pre-Medicine Bridge Program, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +971-50-413-4525 Abstract: Sneezing (sternutatio) is a poorly understood polysynaptic physiologic reflex phenomenon. Sneezing has exerted a strange fascination on humans throughout history, and induced sneezing was widely used by physicians for therapeutic purposes, on the assumption that sneezing eliminates noxious factors from the body, mainly from the head. The present contribution examines the various mixtures used for inducing sneezes (remedia sternutatoria) over the centuries. The majority of the constituents of the sneeze-inducing remedies are modulators of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. The TRP channel superfamily consists of large heterogeneous groups of channels that play numerous physiological roles such as thermosensation, chemosensation, osmosensation and mechanosensation. Sneezing is associated with the activation of the wasabi receptor, (TRPA1), typical ligand is allyl isothiocyanate and the hot chili pepper receptor, (TRPV1), typical agonist is capsaicin, in the vagal sensory nerve terminals, activated by noxious stimulants.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetics of Daikenchuto, a Traditional Japanese Medicine (Kampo) After Single Oral Administration to Healthy Japanese Volunteers
    DMD Fast Forward. Published on July 1, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.040097 DMDThis Fast article Forward. has not been Published copyedited and on formatted. July 1, The2011 final as version doi:10.1124/dmd.111.040097 may differ from this version. DMD #040097 Pharmacokinetics of daikenchuto, a traditional Japanese medicine (Kampo) after single oral administration to healthy Japanese volunteers Masaya Munekage, Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Kengo Ichikawa, Junko Watanabe, Katsuyuki Aoki, Toru Kono, Kazuhiro Hanazaki Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan (M.M., H.K., K.I., K.H); Downloaded from Tsumura Laboratories, TSUMURA & CO., Ami, Ibaraki, Japan (J.W.); Pharmaceutical & Quality Research Department, TSUMURA & CO., Ami, Ibaraki , Japan (K.A.); Division of dmd.aspetjournals.org Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan (T.K.). at ASPET Journals on September 26, 2021 1 Copyright 2011 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. DMD Fast Forward. Published on July 1, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.040097 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. DMD #040097 Running title: Pharmacokinetics study of daikenchuto Address correspondence to: Kazuhiro Hanazaki, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Oko-cho kohasu, Nankoku-shi, Kochi 783-8505, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] , Phone: 81-88-880-2370, Fax: 81-88-880-2371 Number of text pages: 17 Downloaded from Number of Tables: 1 Number of Figures: 2 dmd.aspetjournals.org Number of References: 17 Number of Words: Abstract: 199 at ASPET Journals on September 26, 2021 Introduction: 377 Results and Discussion: 855 ABBREVIATIONS: TJ-100, daikenchuto; HAS, hydroxy-α-sanshool; HBS, hydroxy-β-sanshool; 6S, [6]-shogaol; 10S, [10]-shogaol; GRB1, ginsenoside Rb1; GRG1, ginsenoside Rg1; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LC, liquid chromatography; MS, mass spectrometry; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry 2 DMD Fast Forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Less Than Lethal Weapons
    PUBLIC ORDER MANAGEMENT Less Than Lethal Weapons UN Peacekeeping PDT Standards for Formed Police Units 1st edition 2015 Public Order Management 1 Less Than Lethal Weapons Background Before the inception of UN Peacekeeping mission, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations requests TCC/PCC to contribute with their forces to the strength of the mission. The UN Police component is composed by Individual Police Officers (IPO) and Formed Police Units (FPU). The deployment of FPU is subject to a Memorandum of Understanding between the UN and the contributing country and the compliance with the force requirements of the mission. The force requirement lists the equipment and the weapons that the FPU has to deploy with. Despite the fact ‘Guidelines on the Use of Force by Law Enforcement Agencies’ recommends the development and the deployment of less than lethal weapons and ammunitions, FPUs usually do not possess this type of equipment. Until the development of less-lethal weapons, police officers around the world had few if any less-lethal options for riot control. Common tactics used by police that were intended to be non-lethal or less than lethal included a slowly advancing wall of men with batons. Considering the tasks the FPUs are demanded to carry out, those weapons should be mandatory as part of their equipment. The more equipped with these weapons FPUs are, the more they will be able to efficiently respond to the different type of threats and situation. Non-lethal weapons, also called less-lethal weapons, less-than-lethal weapons, non- deadly weapons, compliance weapons, or pain-inducing weapons are weapons intended to be used in the scale of Use of Force before using any lethal weapon.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Compounds Activating Thermosensitive TRP Channels in Asian Herbal and Medicinal Foods
    J Nutr Sci Vitaminol, 61, S86–S88, 2015 Food Compounds Activating Thermosensitive TRP Channels in Asian Herbal and Medicinal Foods Tatsuo WATANABE and Yuko TERADA School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52–1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka 422–8526, Japan Summary There are several thermosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) ion chan- nels including capsaicin receptor, TRPV1. Food components activating TRPV1 inhibit body fat deposition through sympathetic nerve stimulation. TRPA1 is another pungency sensor for pungent compounds and is mainly coexpressed with TRPV1 in sensory nerve endings. Therefore, TRPA1 activation is expected to have an anti-obesity effect similar to TRPV1 activation. We have searched for agonists for TRPV1 and TRPA1 in vitro from Asian spices by the use of TRPV1- and TRPA1-expressing cells. Further, we performed food component addition tests to high-fat and high-sucrose diets in mice. We found capsiate, capsiconiate, capsainol from hot and sweet peppers, several piperine analogs from black pepper, gingeriols and shogaols from ginger, and sanshools and hydroxysanshools from sansho (Japanese pep- per) to be TRPV1 agonists. We also identified several sulfides from garlic and durian, hydroxy fatty acids from royal jelly, miogadial and miogatrial from mioga (Zingiber mioga), piper- ine analogs from black pepper, and acetoxychavicol acetate (ACA) from galangal (Alpinia galanga) as TRPA1 agonists. Piperine addition to diets diminished visceral fats and increased the uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT), and black pepper extract showed stronger effects than piperine. Cinnamaldehyde and ACA as TRPA1 agonists inhibited fat deposition and increased UCP1. We found that several agonists of TRPV1 and TRPA1 and some agonists of TRPV1 and TRPA1 inhibit visceral fat deposition in mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Oemona Hirta
    EPPO Datasheet: Oemona hirta Last updated: 2021-07-29 IDENTITY Preferred name: Oemona hirta Authority: (Fabricius) Taxonomic position: Animalia: Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Insecta: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae Other scientific names: Isodera villosa (Fabricius), Oemona humilis Newman, Oemona villosa (Fabricius), Saperda hirta Fabricius, Saperda villosa Fabricius Common names: lemon tree borer view more common names online... EPPO Categorization: A1 list more photos... view more categorizations online... EU Categorization: A1 Quarantine pest (Annex II A) EPPO Code: OEMOHI Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature Lu & Wang (2005) revised the genus Oemona, which has 4 species: O. hirta, O. plicicollis, O. separata and O. simplicicollis. They provided an identification key to species and detailed descriptions. They also performed a phylogenetic analysis of all species, suggesting that O. hirta and O. plicicollis are sister species and most similar morphologically. HOSTS O. hirta is a highly polyphagous longhorn beetle. Its larvae feed on over 200 species of trees and shrubs from 63 (Lu & Wang, 2005; Wang, 2017) to 81 (EPPO, 2014) families. Its original hosts were native New Zealand plants, but it expanded its host range to many species exotic to New Zealand, ranging from major fruit, nut, forest and ornamental trees to shrubs and grapevines. Host list: Acacia dealbata, Acacia decurrens, Acacia floribunda, Acacia longifolia, Acacia melanoxylon, Acacia pycnantha, Acer pseudoplatanus, Acer sp., Aesculus hippocastanum, Agathis australis, Albizia julibrissin, Alectryon excelsus, Alnus glutinosa, Alnus incana, Aristotelia serrata, Asparagus setaceus, Avicennia marina, Avicennia resinifera, Azara sp., Betula nigra, Betula pendula, Betula sp., Brachyglottis greyi, Brachyglottis repanda, Brachyglottis rotundifolia, Buddleia davidii, Camellia sp., Carmichaelia australis, Casimiroa edulis, Cassinia leptophylla, Cassinia retorta, Castanea sativa, Casuarina cunninghamiana, Casuarina sp., Celtis australis, Cestrum elegans, Chamaecyparis sp., Chamaecytisus prolifer subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Note: the Letters 'F' and 'T' Following the Locators Refers to Figures and Tables
    Index Note: The letters ‘f’ and ‘t’ following the locators refers to figures and tables cited in the text. A Acyl-lipid desaturas, 455 AA, see Arachidonic acid (AA) Adenophostin A, 71, 72t aa, see Amino acid (aa) Adenosine 5-diphosphoribose, 65, 789 AACOCF3, see Arachidonyl trifluoromethyl Adlea, 651 ketone (AACOCF3) ADP, 4t, 10, 155, 597, 598f, 599, 602, 669, α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin, 711t, 814–815, 890 553 ADPKD, see Autosomal dominant polycystic aa 723–928 fragment, 19 kidney disease (ADPKD) aa 839–873 fragment, 17, 19 ADPKD-causing mutations Aβ, see Amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) PKD1 ABC protein, see ATP-binding cassette protein L4224P, 17 (ABC transporter) R4227X, 17 Abeele, F. V., 715 TRPP2 Abbott Laboratories, 645 E837X, 17 ACA, see N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic R742X, 17 acid (ACA) R807X, 17 Acetaldehyde, 68t, 69 R872X, 17 Acetic acid-induced nociceptive response, ADPR, see ADP-ribose (ADPR) 50 ADP-ribose (ADPR), 99, 112–113, 113f, Acetylcholine-secreting sympathetic neuron, 380–382, 464, 534–536, 535f, 179 537f, 538, 711t, 712–713, Acetylsalicylic acid, 49t, 55 717, 770, 784, 789, 816–820, Acrolein, 67t, 69, 867, 971–972 885 Acrosome reaction, 125, 130, 301, 325, β-Adrenergic agonists, 740 578, 881–882, 885, 888–889, α2 Adrenoreceptor, 49t, 55, 188 891–895 Adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Actinopterigy, 223 1023 Activation gate, 485–486 Aframomum daniellii (aframodial), 46t, 52 Leu681, amino acid residue, 485–486 Aframomum melegueta (Melegueta pepper), Tyr671, ion pathway, 486 45t, 51, 70 Acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic Agelenopsis aperta (American funnel web syndrome (AML/MDS), 949 spider), 48t, 54 Acylated phloroglucinol hyperforin, 71 Agonist-dependent vasorelaxation, 378 Acylation, 96 Ahern, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Invertebrate Fauna Trajectories in Remediation Sites of Winstone Aggregates Hunua Quarry in Auckland
    ISSN: 1179-7738 ISBN: 978-0-86476-417-1 Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 59 Assessing the invertebrate fauna trajectories in remediation sites of Winstone Aggregates Hunua quarry in Auckland by Kate Curtis1, Mike Bowie1, Keith Barber2, Stephane Boyer3 , John Marris4 & Brian Patrick5 1Department of Ecology, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647 2Winstone Aggregates, Hunua Gorge Road, Red Hill 2110, Auckland 3Department of Nature Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology, PO Box 92025, Auckland 1142. 4Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647. 5Consultant Ecologist, Wildlands, PO Box 33499, Christchurch. Prepared for: Winstone Aggregates April 2016 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………....................... 2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 37 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………………. 38 Acknowlegdements……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 39 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 1 Abstract This study monitored the invertebrates in restoration plantings in the Winstone Aggregates Hunua Quarry. This was to assess the re-establishment of invertebrates in the restoration planting sites and compare them with unplanted control and mature sites. This study follows on from
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION RESTORING ISLAND BIRDS and SEED DISPERSAL in NEW ZEALAND's FENCED MAINLAND ISLAND SANCTUARIES Submitted by Sara
    DISSERTATION RESTORING ISLAND BIRDS AND SEED DISPERSAL IN NEW ZEALAND’S FENCED MAINLAND ISLAND SANCTUARIES Submitted by Sara Petrita Bombaci Graduate Degree Program in Ecology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2018 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Liba Pejchar Sarah Reed Julie Savidge Melinda Smith Copyright by Sara Petrita Bombaci 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT RESTORING ISLAND BIRDS AND SEED DISPERSAL IN NEW ZEALAND’S FENCED MAINLAND ISLAND SANCTUARIES Island ecosystems are global biodiversity hotspots, but many island species face population declines and extinction. These losses are mainly driven by invasive mammals that consume or compete with native animals and degrade their habitats. The decline of island animal populations may also impact ecosystem processes that depend on them, e.g. seed dispersal, pollination, and nutrient cycling. The island nation of New Zealand has pioneered a unique solution – fenced mainland island sanctuaries – which exclude invasive mammals from natural habitats and provide opportunities to restore native birds and other wildlife. Yet, critics question whether sanctuaries, which are costly and require continuous maintenance, effectively conserve birds and ecosystems, given minimal research on sanctuary project outcomes. I assessed if sanctuaries are an effective conservation tool for restoring birds and seed dispersal in New Zealand. I compared bird population densities and bird-mediated seed dispersal in three fenced sanctuary sites to three paired reference sites (with minimal mammal control). From January- April 2016 and 2017, I set seed traps to measure dispersed-seed abundance, conducted focal tree observations to determine foraging rates for six tree species, and used distance sampling-based point counts to survey birds at randomly placed sampling locations within each site.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Mobility of Allyl Isothiocyanate and Chloropicrin As Influenced By
    HORTSCIENCE 54(4):706–714. 2019. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13836-18 and some soil arthropods, but it provides little control of fungi and weeds, whereas Met-Na controls weeds, nematodes, and some fungi. CP Soil Mobility of Allyl Isothiocyanate controls insects and fungi, but it has less activity against nematodes and weeds (Ajwa and Trout, and Chloropicrin as Influenced by 2004). The most promising MeBr alternatives are chloropicrin and Met-Na (Gao et al., 2012; Surfactants and Soil Texture Jacoby, 2016; Klose et al., 2008; Yates et al., 2002); therefore, more than 7000 tons of chlo- Feras Almasri ropicrin were used in 2011 (Nelson et al., 2013) Department of Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA in California. 95616 Although Met-Na is an effective fumigant (Nelson et al., 2002), the use of Met-Na is Husein A. Ajwa strongly regulated due to the excessive soil fu- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, 1636 East migant release into the atmosphere (Goodhue et al., 2016; Saeed et al., 1997). Because of Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905 this excessive release into the atmosphere, Sanjai J. Parikh Met-Na, Met-K, and DMTT labels require wide buffer zones and specific measures to University of California at Davis, Department of Land, Air and Water protect people from off-target movement Resources, Davis, CA 95616 (Guthman and Brown, 2016). Furthermore, 1 Met-Na, Met-K, and DMTT degrade in soil Kassim Al-Khatib to MITC, which is classified as a toxicity I Department of Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA category pesticide (Gao et al., 2012; Klose 95616 et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Trpa1) Activity by Cdk5
    MODULATION OF TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL CATION CHANNEL, SUBFAMILY A, MEMBER 1 (TRPA1) ACTIVITY BY CDK5 A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Michael A. Sulak December 2011 Dissertation written by Michael A. Sulak B.S., Cleveland State University, 2002 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2011 Approved by _________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Derek S. Damron _________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Robert V. Dorman _________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Ernest J. Freeman _________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Ian N. Bratz _________________, Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Bansidhar Datta Accepted by _________________, Director, School of Biomedical Sciences Dr. Robert V. Dorman _________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. John R. D. Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... vi DEDICATION ...................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. viii CHAPTER 1: Introduction .................................................................................. 1 Hypothesis and Project Rationale
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Materials to Cornea INTRODUCTION
    International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research Uluslararası Veteriner ve Hayvan Araştırmaları Dergisi E-ISSN: 2651-3609 2(1): 06-10, 2019 Toxic Materials to Cornea Eren Ekici1, Ender Yarsan2* 1Ankara Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophtalmology, Ankara, Turkey 2Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ankara, Turkey *Corresponding Author Received: February 12, 2019 E-mail:[email protected] Accepted: March 6, 2019 Abstract Every day; many chemical agents, materials or medicines whether in the pharmaceutical industry or daily life are offered for consuming for human beings. At this point, it has great importance that if the substances threaten heath or not. Because the toxicity of materials can lead to many target organ damage. The eye, together with many anatomical layers that make it up is among the target organs exposed to toxicity. In this review, we handled the classification, effects and treatment methods of toxic materials on the corneal layer of the eye. Keywords: Cornea, toxic materials, chemicals, eye INTRODUCTION and materials known to be toxic in high-risk situations (ie Toxic material is a chemical substance that breaks down aminoglycosides, some glaucoma medications, antivirals, normal physiological and biochemical mechanisms when chronic disease, dry eyes and patients on multiple topical it enters the living organism (human and warm-blooded therapies) is effective to protect from toxicity (Dart, 2003). animals) through mouth, respiration, skin, and infection, or Table 1: Classification by route of exposure and time course. causes the death of the creature in an excess amount. For Local action, immediate corneal toxicity; there are many methods of classification Examples effects based on the disease, route of exposure and duration or agent Caustic chemicals Acids and alkalis (Grant, 1986).
    [Show full text]