Arxiv:2107.13991V2 [Math.AG] 1 Sep 2021 TBEVCO UDE NAHYPER-K a on BUNDLES VECTOR STABLE ..Telvsbpc Fa Betin Object an of Subspace LLV the 6.3

Home , Modularity theorem

arXiv:2107.13991v2 [math.AG] 1 Sep 2021 TBEVCO UDE NAHYPER-K A ON BUNDLES VECTOR STABLE ..TeLVsbpc fa betin object an of subspace LLV The 6.3. ..Sblerso h ohcidLeagbagnrtdby generated algebra Lie symplectic Hochschild holomorphic the a of of Subalgebras algebra Lie Hochschild 6.2. The 6.1. .Sal eeiesevswt ak1osrcinmpaem sheaves are of map Examples obstruction 1 modularity rank of 3.2. a Proof with sheaves reflexive 3.1. Stable 3. ..We a oua ha on sheaf modular a can When 3.3. ..Ra ( Real lattice LLV rational 2.2. The 2.1. .Ra ( Real 2. Introduction 1. .TeLVln fa betof object an of line LLV The group monodromy derived 6. The equivalence BKR 5. The 4. Date etme ,2021. 3, September : on ha etri h oieg-ut-ebtk atc o lattice Looijenga-Lunts-Verbitsky the in vector a sheaf a oso sheaves torsion xmlso uhmdlrsevseeg.Tefis orecon source first The emerge. sheaves modular sheaves such of examples that eodsuc soitst set a to associates source second fasysrprsefvaadrvdeuvlne h hr s third The equivalence. derived a via sheaf such sky-scraper of consists a source of second The manifolds. symplectic iesoa ouisaeo etrbnlso a on bundles vector of space moduli dimensional btuto map obstruction eomto of deformation pnadprilygnrlzsrslso .OGayfor O’Grady K. of results generalizes partially and upon iebnl of bundle line neuvlneΦ: Φ equivalence an eiesheaf flexive oteeuvratvco bundle vector equivariant the to a Abstract. K neapeo h rtsuc scntutduigasal an stable a using constructed is source first the of example An X surface 3 Z [ n ,p p, ] eom with deforms F ,p p, orsodn oteeuvratbundle equivariant the to corresponding RANK A -lse hc eano og yet rtodri l dire all in order first to type Hodge of remain which )-classes fpstv akwihaeioopi oteiaeΦ( image the to isomorphic are which rank positive of )-classes Let F X Z X L is . X ogttemdlrvco bundle vector modular the get to HH eso htif that show We . upre sln ude nhlmrhclgaga subman lagrangian holomorphic on bundles line as supported modular D ea reuil 2 irreducible an be X 2 b ( ( X nc-ieso n nmdl and moduli in one co-dimension in X 1 ) ) F BTUTO A R MODULAR ARE MAP OBSTRUCTION fisAuaaalgebra Azumaya its if , → → iharn btuto map obstruction 1 rank a with Ext D b G ( 2 { D Y ( G ⊠ ,F F, ftedrvdctgre ftoirdcbeholomorphic irreducible two of categories derived the of ) F b i ( YLMARKMAN EYAL · · · } X X sasoesal eeiesefo oiiern n the and rank positive of sheaf reflexive slope-stable a is i n n =1 a ak1 then 1, rank has ) dmninlhlmrhcsmlci aiod re- A manifold. symplectic holomorphic -dimensional Contents ⊠ hc eom nc-ieso in 1 co-dimension in deforms which ) edfre oa nwse ha on sheaf untwisted an to deformed be D of G b n on ( 1 X itntsal etrbnlsi h aetwo same the in bundles vector stable distinct X ) ⊕ K n σ F surface 3 ∈ E i h K-orsodne hsbuilds This BKR-correspondence. the via S nd nteHletscheme Hilbert the on n [ ( G F F L F σ n hc r smrhct h image the to isomorphic are which , rank f eom with deforms ) (1) sartoa oe ftecanonical the of power rational a is O] osrcino the of construction A [O2]. 2 = smdlr eascaet such to associate We modular. is uc ossso mgsΦ( images of consists ource HE AIODWITH MANIFOLD AHLER X ¨ ⊠ O h oua etrbundle vector modular the · · · it fsoesal reflexive slope-stable of sists b X HT ii etrbundle vector rigid d 2 ftesrcuesefvia sheaf structure the of ) yepaein hyperplane a ( ⊠ aiod31 manifold X G 2 .Tresucsof sources Three 2. + ) dlr12 odular ( σ X ( n X ) ) on ] → X oeeyKähler every to [ ifolds X n Ext ] associated , n tos9 ctions . 2 HH ( Z Y HT F such , 20 ? L G 16 ) 2 of ) ( 2 on F X ( X 31 ) 35 ) 38 12 10 28 25 9 2 2 EYAL MARKMAN

6.4. The LLV line 40 6.5. Torsion sheaves which deform in co-dimension 1 are supported on lagrangian subvarieties or points 47 7. Lagrangian surfaces in IHSMs of K3[2]-type 49 7.1. The Chern character of for a maximally deformable lagrangian surface Z 49 OZ 7.2. Lagrangian surfaces Z with Z having a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map 51 7.3. Integral constraints for the existenceO of smooth lagrangian surfaces 52 7.4. Lagrangian subvarieties with a positive LLV line may lead to new examples of IHSMs 54 8. Effective LLV lines 54 9. The Chern character of a modular vector bundle isomorphic to Φ( [2] ) 56 OK3 10. Modular vector bundles isomorphic to Φ( K3[n] ) 60 11. Modular vector bundles with isotropic MukaiO vector over Hilbert schemes 62 11.1. The Chern character of the Fourier-Mukai image of a sky-scraper sheaf 62 11.2. Proof of Theorem 1.6 65 12. The action of the derived monodromy group of S on the LLV lattice of S[n] 65 13. A reflexive torsion free Fourier-Mukai image of a lagrangian line bundle with a positive LLV line 69 13.1. Fourier-Mukai images of line bundles on the Fano variety of lines on a cubic 3-fold 69 13.2. Explicit description of the isospectral Hilbert scheme for n = 2 70 13.3. A local coordinate description of the strict transforms of diagonals 72 13.4. The kernel of the BKR-conjugate of the square of a spherical twist by 73 OS 13.5. Reflexivity of the Fourier-Mukai image of Z (k) 78 13.6. Proof of Proposition 13.2 O 81 References 85

1. Introduction An irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold is a simply connected compact Kähler man- 0 2 ifold X such that H (X, ΩX ) is one-dimensional spanned by an everywhere non-degenerate holomorphic 2-form. If X is 2-dimensional, then it is a K3 surface. It is well known that if E is a slope-stable vector bundle over a K3 surface X, then the projective bundle P(E) deforms with X to every complex deformation of X [Ve4]. The analogous statement fails if dim(X) > 2 even to first order, since c2( nd(E)) need not remain of Hodge type (2, 2). The starting point of this paper is the observationE that an analogous statement holds for torsion free reflexive sheaves satisfying the infinitesimal condition that the obstruction homomorphism (1.1) obs : HH2(X) Ext2(E, E) E → has rank 1 (Theorem 1.2). Above, HH2(X) is the second Hochschild cohomology of X, considered as the space of natural transformations from the identity functor id : Db(X) Db(X) → to its shift id[2], and obsE sends a natural transformation α to its value αE on E. The space HH2(X) parametrizes first order deformations of the category Coh(X) of coherent sheaves on X and those yield also first order deformations of the derived category Db(X) [To]. The VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 3

2 class obsE(ξ) is the obstruction to lifting ξ HH (X) to a first order deformation of the pair (Db(X), E) (see [To, Prop. 6.1]). ∈ Given an object F Db(X) of non-zero rank r, set κ(F ) := ch(F )exp −c1(F ) . If F is a ∈ r locally free coherent sheaf, then κ(F ) is a characteristic class of the projective bundle P(F ). We first observe that if X is a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold and F b is an object in D (X) with obsF of rank 1, then κ(F ) remains a Hodge class for all Kähler deformations of X (see Lemma 2.3). Given an equivalence of derived categories Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ), we have a commutative diagram → Φ HH2(X) ∗ / HH2(Y )

obsF obsΦ(F ) Hom(F, F [2]) / Hom(Φ(F ), Φ(F )[2]), Φ where the horizontal arrows are isomorphisms, and so the rank of obsΦ(F ) and obsF are equal. If rank(F ) = 0, then the restriction of obs to the subspace H0(X, ) of HH2(X) is injective, 6 F OX by [HL, Lemma 10.1.3]. Thus, rank(obsF ) 1 for every object F such that rank(Φ(F )) = 0, for some equivalence of derived categories Φ≥ : Db(X) Db(Y ). Three sources1 of objects6 F → with obsF of rank 1 emerge: b b (1) F = Φ( X ), where Φ : D (X) D (Y ) is an equivalence of derived categories of two projectiveO irreducible holomorphic→ symplectic manifolds. Note that Ext2( , ) is OX OX one dimensional and so obsF has rank 1. (2) F is the image of a sky-scraper sheaf of a point via an equivalence Φ as above (See Section 3.1). F is the image Φ(ι∗L) via an equivalence Φ as above, where ι : Z ֒ X is the embedding (3) of Z as a holomorphic lagrangian submanifold and L is a line bundle→ on Z, such that (a) ι∗ : H1,1(X) H1,1(Z) has rank 1, and (b) L is a rational→ power of the canonical line bundle of Z. Sources (1) and (2) above seem to be special cases of deformations of source (3). If, for exampe, X is the Hilbert scheme S[n] of n points on a K3 surface S and S contains a smooth b [n] rational curve C, then S[n] is the image via an auto-equivalence of D (S ) of the structure O [n] sheaf C[n] of the lagrangian projective space C (see Example 3.12). Similarly, assume that S admitsO an elliptic ﬁbration with a section and C S, 1 i n, are n distinct smooth i ⊂ ≤ ≤ ﬁbers. The sky-scraper sheaf Cp supported on the origin p of the lagrangian abelian variety n [n] b [n] A := i=1 Ci S is the image of A via an auto-equivalence of D (S ). We prove the following statement.⊂ O Q Theorem 1.1. (Theorem 6.24) Let ι : Z X be an embedding of a variety Z as a proper subvariety of an irreducible holomorphic symplectic→ manifold X. Let F be a torsion free coherent sheaf on Z. If obsι∗F has rank 1, then ι(Z) is either a lagrangian subvariety or a point.

1 n 2 n The rank of obsF is 1 for every P -object F , since then dim Hom(F, F [2]) = dim H (P ) = 1. However, all examples of Pn-objects we are aware of arise via one of sources (1) or (3) listed via equivalences of derived categories and deformations. 4 EYAL MARKMAN

The following theorem is a consequence of Verbitsky’s results on hyperholomorphic sheaves in [Ve5] and the fact that κ(F ) remains a Hodge class under all deformations for a sheaf F with a rank 1 obstruction homomorphism obsF . Theorem 1.2. (Theorem 3.4) Let F be a reflexive sheaf of rank r > 0 over an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X. Assume that obsF has rank 1 and that F is H-slope- stable with respect to every ample line-bundle H in some open subcone of the ample cone of X. Then for every irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold Y deformation equivalent to X there exists a possibly twisted coherent sheaf E over Y and a flat deformation of the pair (X, F ) to the pair (Y,E). Following is a sketch of the proof of Theorem 1.2. Results of Verbitsky in [Ve5] reduce the proof to showing that c ( nd(F )) remains of Hodge type (2, 2) under all deformations of 2 E X as a Kähler manifold. The latter reduces to showing that c2( nd(F )) remains of Hodge type (2, 2) under all first order infinitesimal complex deformationsE of X, by Lemma 2.3. Set 2 0 2 1 2 HT (X) := H (X, T X) H (X,TX) H (X, X ). The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism IHKR :∧HT 2(X⊕) HH2(X)⊕ composesO with obs to a rank 1 homomorphism → F obsHT := obs IHKR : HT 2(X) Ext2(F, F ). F F ◦ → 1 The class c2( nd(F )) remains of Hodge type in the direction of ξ H (X,TX), if and only E 2 ∈ if there exists a class θ H (X, X ), such that F deforms to first order in the direction of (0,ξ,θ) HT 2(X). Toda∈ proved thatO this is the case, if and only if (0,ξ,θ) HT 2(X) belongs ∈ HT HT ∈ to the kernel of obsF (here we use also a result of [Hua] that obsF is the obstruction map HT used by Toda, see Lemma 6.10). Now, if the rank of F does not vanish, then obsF maps 2 2 HT 1 H ( X ) injectively into Ext (F, F ). Thus, the intersection of ker(obsF ) and H (X,TX) 2 O 1 1 ⊕ H ( X ) must project onto H (X,TX). Hence, every ξ H (X,TX) lifts to a class (0,ξ,θ) in O HT ∈ ker(obsF ). Remark 1.3. Theorem 1.2 holds also for abelian surfaces (Remark 3.5). If F is an object in the derived category Db(X) of an abelian variety X of dimension 3, then the minimal rank of 2,0 2 ≥ 2,0 obsF is h (X) := dim(H ( X )). Slope-stable vector bundles F with obsF of rank h (X) are semi-homogeneous (see LemmaO 3.6). These were extensively studied by Mukai [Mu3]. Theorems 1.4 and 1.6 below exhibit two examples of sheaves F satisfying the conditions of the above Theorem. Let (S,H) be a generic polarized K3 surface, let G be an H-slope-stable locally 1 n free sheaf on S with vanishing Ext (G, G). Let the symmetric group Sn act on S permuting the factors. The Hilbert scheme S[n] of length n zero dimensional subschemes of S is isomorphic to an irreducible component of the Sn-Hilbert scheme of length n! zero-dimensional Sn-invariant n 0 subschemes Z of S , such that H ( Z ) is the regular representation of Sn [Hai]. There exists O [n] n a universal Sn-invariant subscheme Γ S S with a Sn-linearization ρ, such that the ⊂ × b n b [n] object ( Γ, ρ) is the Fourier-Mukai kernel of an equivalence BKR : DSn (S ) D (S ) O n →[n] between the Sn-equivariant derived category of S and the derived category of S [BKR]. ⊠n [n] The vector bundle G := G ⊠ G ⊠ ⊠ G over S comes with a canonical Sn-linearizarion ⊠ · · · ρ⊠. The object G[n] := BKR((G n, ρ⊠)) is isomorphic to a rank rn locally free sheaf over S[n]. 2i ⊠ ⊠ 2i Now, Ext ((G n, ρ⊠), (G n, ρ⊠)) is 1-dimensional, for 0 i n, hence Ext (G[n], G[n]) is Sn ≤ ≤ one-dimensional as well, for 0 i n, and so obs [n] has rank 1. ≤ ≤ G VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 5

Theorem 1.4. For every irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X of K3[n] deformation type there exists a possibly twisted locally free sheaf E and a deformation of the pair (S[n], G[n]) Pn i i Pn C to (X, E). E is a -object, i.e., Ext (E, E) ∼= H ( , ), and in particular E is infinitesimally rigid. E is slope-stable with respect to classes in an open subcone of the Kähler cone of X. The theorem is proved in section 10. The theorem was proved by O’Grady in case n = 2, where it was further proven that the moduli space of vector bundles with the same Chern classes as E is a single point [O2]. O’Grady proved that the Chern class c ( nd(G[2])) remains of Hodge 2 E type under all Kähler deformations of S[2] by explicitly computing this class. The current paper emerged from the author’s attempt to provide a conceptual explanation to O’Grady’s intriguing result. Remark 1.5. The pair (S, G) in Theorem 1.4 is related, via a finite sequence of deformations and derived equivalences, to the pair (T, T ), for some K3 surface T . More precisely, there O ′ ′ are two sequences (Si, Gi), 0 i N, and (Si, Gi), 0 i N 1, and derived equivalences b ′ b ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ − Φi : D (Si) D (Si+1), 0 i N 1, such that (S0, G0) = (S, G), (SN , GN ) = (T, T ), ′ ′ → ≤ ≤ − O (Si, Gi) is a deformation of (Si, Gi), and Gi+1 is a slope-stable locally free sheaf isomorphic ′ [n] [n] b ′ [n] b [n] to Φi(Gi). Now, T = T [n] and the BKR-conjugate Φi : D ((Si) ) D (Si+1) of the O ⊠ O → [n] derived equivalence Φ n : Db ((S′)n) = Db (Sn ) is an equivalence mapping (G′ )[n] to G . i Sn i ∼ Sn i+1 i i+1 [n] [n] [n] Hence, the pair (S , G ) is related to the pair (T , T [n] ) via a sequence of deformations and derived equivalences. O

Let (S,H) be a polarized K3 surface and MH (v) a 2-dimensional projective moduli space of H-slope-stable locally free sheaves over S with Mukai vector v of rank r. Then MH (v) is a K3 surface [Mu2]. Let be a universal vector bundle over S M (v), possibly twisted by U × H a Brauer class θ. Then the Fourier-Mukai transformation Φ : Db(M (v),θ−1) Db(S) is U H → an equivalence [Ca4, Theorem 1.3]. Choose n distinct points [Gi] in MH (v) corresponding to n vector bundles G , 1 i n. The vector bundle G := S G ⊠ G ⊠ ⊠ G i ≤ ≤ ⊕σ∈ n σ(1) σ(2) · · · σ(n) admits a Sn-linearization ρ and any two linearizations yield isomorphic objects (G, ρ) (Remark 4.1). The object BKR(G, ρ) is isomorphic to a rank (n!)rn locally free sheaf F over S[n]. Let p (M (v))[n] be the point corresponding to the length n subscheme of M (v) supported on ∈ H H the set [G ] : 1 i n . Let Φ[n] : Db(M (v))[n], (θ−1)[n]) Db(S[n]) be the BKR conjugate { i ≤ ≤ } U H → of Φ⊠n : Db ((M (v))n, (θ−1)⊠n) Db (Sn). F is isomorphic to the image Φ[n](C ) of the U Sn H → Sn U p sky-scraper sheaf Cp. Hence, obsF has rank 1. Theorem 1.6. For every irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X of K3[n] deformation type there exists a possibly twisted locally free sheaf E and a deformation of the pair (S[n], F ) to (X, E). E is slope-stable with respect to classes in an open subcone of the K¨ahler cone of X. The theorem is proved in Section 11. A criterion for the existence of an untwisted sheaf E in Theorems 1.4 and 1.6 is provided in Section 3.3. We do not know if the property that obsF has rank 1 is an open condition. A priori, the rank of obsF may increase after a deformation of (X, F ). However, the following theorem lists topological consequences of the fact that the rank of obsF is one, and those are clearly deformation invariant. Let X bea2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Consider the vector space H(X, Q) := Qα H2(X, Q) Qβ, ⊕ ⊕ e 6 EYAL MARKMAN endowed with the symmetric bilinear pairing with respect to which α and β are isotropic, (α, β) = 1, U := span α, β is orthogonal to H2(X, Q), and the pairing restricts to the Beauville-Bogomolov-Fujiki− { pairing} on H2(X, Q). Verbitsky and Looijenga-Lunts constructed a canonical (topological) representation of the Lie algebra so(H(X, Q)) on the cohomology ∗ ∗ H (X, Q) (see [LL, Ve3]). Denote by gX the image of so(H(X, Q)) in gl(H (X, Q)). The sub- ∗ ∗ 2 ring SH (X, Q) of H (X, Q) generated by H (X, Q) is isomorphice as a gX -subrepresentation to the irreducible subrepresentation V (n) of Symn(H(X, Q))e spanned by n-th powers of isotropic classes and V (n) appears with multiplicity 1 in H∗(X, Q). Hence, we get a canonical projection from H∗(X, Q) to SH∗(X, Q). Given ane equivalence Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) between two projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds we get an induced→ isomorphism φ : H∗(X, Q) H∗(Y, Q). Taelman proved that φ conjugates g to g and the restriction of → X Y φ to SH∗(X) is induced by an isometry φ˜ : H(X, Q) H(Y, Q). Furthermore, there exists a → canonical gX -equivariant isomorphism Ψ : SH∗(X,e Q) V (ne), → which is (φ, φ˜)-equivariant, up to sign [Ta, Theorems 4.7 and 4.9]. Given an object F of b D (X), let v(F ) := ch(F )√tdX be its Mukai vector and letv ˆ(F ) be the projection of v(F ) to SH∗(X, Q). Note thatv ˆ(F ) does not vanish, if rank(F ) = 0 or if F is a sky scraper sheaf, or if F is the image of such an object via an equivalence of derived6 categories. b Theorem 1.7. (Theorem 6.13) Let F be an object of D (X) with obsF of rank 1. Assume that vˆ(F ) does not vanish.

(1) The stabilizer gv(F ) of v(F ) in gX is equal to the subalgebra of gX annihilating a line ℓ(F ) in H(X, Q). (2) The isomorphism Ψ maps vˆ(F ) into the image of ℓ(F )n via the projection from Symn(H(X, Q)) to V (n).e (3) If the rank r of F does not vanish, then ℓ(F ) = span rα+c1(F )+sβ , for some rationale number s. { } (4) Given an equivalence Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) between two irreducible holomorphic sym- → plectic manifolds, we have ℓ(Φ(F )) = φ˜(ℓ(F )). Theorem 1.7 shows that H(X, Q) plays a role analogous to that of the Mukai lattice of a K3 surface in the classiﬁcation of objects F with obsF of rank 1. Note that the rank of obsF is 1 for every simple sheaf F overe a K3 surface, since Ext2(F, F ) is 1-dimensional. We refer to H(X, Q) as the rational LLV lattice. When X is of K3[2]-type2 there exists an integral lattice in H(X, Q), which is preserved by equivalences of derived categories and by monodromy operators [Ta,e Theorem 9.8]. [n] e The integral X √tdX for X of K3 and generalized Kummer deformation types was computed in [Sa, Prop. 19 and 21]. We use Sawon’s computations to show that ℓ( X ) = R [n] O span 4α + (n + 3)β , if X is of K3 deformation type, and ℓ( X ) = span 4α + (n + 1)β , if X is{ of generalized Kummer} deformation type (Lemma 6.18). O { }

2The author was notiﬁed by Thorsten Beckmann that he extended [Ta, Theorem 9.8] for every manifold of K3[n]-type, for all n ≥ 1. Partial results were obtained independently by the author and are included in this paper (Remark 8.2). VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 7

It is sometimes challenging to prove that obsF has rank 1, yet possible to prove the property in Theorem 1.7(1). We prove it in Lemma 7.3 for the structure sheaf of a smooth lagrangian OZ surface Z in X of K3[2]-type, when the restriction homomorphism H2(X, Q) H2(Z, Q) has → rank 1 and c1(ωZ ) belongs to its image. If F satisfies the property in Theorem 1.7(1) we say that F has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map (see Definition 6.11 (2)). The images of such objects F via derived equivalences each has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map as well. The modularity Theorem 1.2 above holds if we replace the property that obsF has rank 1 by the property that F has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map. The line ℓ( Z ) of the structure sheaf of a lagrangian submanifold Z of X, with having a rank 1 cohomologicalO OZ obstruction map, is computed in Lemma 6.25 when c1(ωZ ) belongs to the image of the pullback homomorphism ι∗ : H2(X, Q) H2(Z, Q) via the embedding ι : Z X. The homomorphism ι∗ necessarily has rank 1 in this→ case and we have → t(λ, λ) ℓ(ι ) = span λ + β , ∗OZ { 2 } ∗ ⊥ ∗ where c1(ωZ)= tι (λ) and λ = ker(ι ) (Lemma 6.25). The proof of Theorem 1.7 proceeds as follows. The Hodge decomposition exhibits H∗(X, C) ∗ a b as a module over the ring HT (X) := a,bH (X, T X). The action homomorphism m : ∗ ∗ 2 ⊕ ∧ HT (X) gl(H (X, C)) maps HT (X) into the LLV Lie algebra gC := gX Q C, by [Ve1] (see → ˜ HT ⊗ also [Ta, Prop. 2.9]). Let Σ(F ) be the image of ker obsF via the graded Duflo automorphism ∗ 2 of HT (X) given by contraction with √td . Then m : HT (X) gC maps Σ(˜ F ) into the X → stabilizer gC,v(F ) in gC of the Mukai vector v(F ) of F (see [Hua], or Lemma 6.10). We prove ˜ that m(Σ(F )) and its complex conjugate generate gC,v(F ), if the rank of obsF is 1 (Lemma 6.7). 2 Composing m with the action of gC on H(X, C) yields a homomorphism from HT (X) into gl(H(X, C)). Evaluation at a holomorphic 2-form on X, considered as an element of H(X, C), gives rise to a homomorphism µ : HT 2(X)e H(X, C) which pulls back the pairing on H(X, C) → to onee on HT 2(X), canonical up to a scalar (Lemma 6.3). We get the line Σ(˜ F )⊥ in HTe 2(X) orthogonal to Σ(˜ F ) and we set ℓ(F ) := µ Σ(˜ Fe )⊥ . We show that ℓ(F ) is defined overe Q and gC,v(F ) is the complexification of the subalgebra ofgX annihilating ℓ(F ) (Lemma 6.9). In Section 8 we include a conjectural discussion of the following.

Question 1.8. Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Which lines in H(X, Q) are of the form ℓ(F ), for some object F which has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map? e Very little is known even for X of K3[2]-deformation type. The question is related to the existence of lagrangian surfaces in the generic polarized such X. When ι : Z X is an ∗ 2 2 → embedding of a smooth lagrangian surface, ι : H (X, Q) H (Z, Q) has rank 1, and c1(ωZ ) ∗ → belongs to its image, then ι∗ι L has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map for every line bundle L on X, by Lemma 7.3. We show that for a primitive polarization L, the existence of such a lagrangian surface, which locally deform with all deformations of (X,L), implies that the Beauville-Bogomolov-Fujiki self-intersection 2d := (c1(L), c1(L)) of L satisﬁes the following arithmetic constraint: d/ gcd(3, d) is a perfect square. See Lemma 7.6 for a more detailed statement involving stronger arithmetic constraints. 8 EYAL MARKMAN

Equivalences of derived categories of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds of K3[n] deformation type are morphisms of a groupoid K3[n], i.e., a category all of whose morphisms are isomorphisms. We have the functor [n] : K3[1] K3[n], sending a K3 surface S to its Hilbert [n] → scheme S and sending equivalences of derived categories Φ : S1 S2 to the equivalences [n] b [n] b [n] → Φ : D (S1 ) D (S2 ) as in Theorems 1.4 and 1.6 above (see Section 4 for the definition). Let LLV be the→ groupoid, whose objects are irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds and whose morphisms are isometries of their rational LLV lattices. Taelman’s work gives rise to a functor H : K3[n] LLV . The values of the composite functor H [n] on morphisms are not → [n] ◦ [n] [n] equal to those one may naively expect. The composition H(Φ ) : H(S1 , Q) H(S2 , Q) was b b → computede for every equivalence Φ : D (S1) D (S2) of derived categoriese of K3 surfaces and for n = 2 in [Ta, Theorem 9.4]. We extend→ the computatione for allen in the followinge theorem as an application of Theorem 1.7 above. The space H2(S, Q) is naturally the subspace of H2(S[n], Q) orthogonal to the class δ, which is half the class of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes. The inclusion H2(S, Q) H2(S[n], Q) ⊂ extends to a natural isometric embedding of H(S, Q) onto the hyperplane δ⊥ in H(S[n], Q) [n] orthogonal to the class δ. Let ηΦ O(H(S , Q)) be the extension of H(Φ) leaving δ invariant. [n] ∈ 2 [n] It turns out that H(Φ ) is not equal to ηΦ in general.e Associated to a class λ H (eS , Q) is [n] ∈ an isometry Bλ of H(S , Q), which correspondse to the action of tensorizatione by a line bundle L whenever λ = c1e(L). e n+1 Theorem 1.9. (Theorem 12.2) H(Φ[n]) = det H(Φ) (B η B ). −δ/2 ◦ Φ ◦ δ/2 e [n] e b [n] b [n] Let χ be the sign character of Sn and let Φχ : D (S ) D (S ) be the BKR-conjugate of b n → the auto-equivalence of DSn (S ) of tensorization by the sign character. The proof of Theorem [n] [n] 1.9 is based on the observation that the isometries H(Φ ) all commute with H(Φχ ), and [n] [n] H(Φχ ) is, up to sign, the reflection of H(S , Q) with respect to the hyperplane orthogonal to the class B (δ)= δ + (n 1)β (Lemma 12.1). e e −δ/2 − e The vector bundle E in Theorem 1.4e has a negative definite LLV line ℓ(E) and that in Theorem 1.6 has an isotropic LLV line. In Section 13 we consider a particular example of a reflexive torsion free sheaf E, which has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map and with a positive LLV line ℓ(E). Let X be a cubic fourfold. The Fano variety of lines F (X) on X is holomorphic symplectic of K3[2]-type, by [BD]. The Fano variety F (C) of lines on a hyperplane section C of X is a lagrangian surface in F (X) and F (C) has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map, by Lemma 7.3. We exhibit reflexive torsion fOree sheaves E, which are Fourier- Mukai images of . Each E thus has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map. We expect OF (C) E to be slope-stable with respect to classes in an open subcone of the ample cone of F (X). Once proven, E would be modular, by Theorem 1.2. Results of [LSV, Vo2] suggest that the irreducible component M containing E of the moduli space of slope-stable sheaves on F (X) is birational to an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of O’Grady10 deformation type. A possibly naive hope is that this would lead to a description of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds M of O’Grady10 deformation type as moduli spaces of hyperholomorphic sheaves on holomorphic symplectic manifolds Y of K3[2]-deformation type. A program of constructing irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds as such moduli spaces is described in [Ve5]. Such VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 9 a modular description would enable the study of the cohomology ring of M via a universal sheaf on Y M. A modular description is currently provided only for the complement of an exceptional× divisor of a resolution M of singularities of a moduli space of sheaves on a K3 surface [O3]. We refer the reader to the table of content for the organization of the paper. A summary of each section is included in the opening paragraph of the section. Acknowledgements: This work is partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foun- dation (#427110). I am grateful to Andrei C˘ald˘araru and Shengyuan Huang for help with the proof of Lemma 6.10. I thank Giulia Saccàfor pointing out references [F, IM2, L]. I am grateful to Justin Sawon for pointing out his results in [Sa, Prop. 19 and 21]. I thank Thorsten Beckmann for comments on an early draft of this paper. Note: Thorsten Beckmann independently assigned vectors in the LLV lattice to various objects in the derived categories of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds, and he also proved Theorem 12.2 [Bec].

2. Real (p,p)-classes which remain of Hodge type to first order in all directions In Section 2.1 we review the action of the Looijenga-Lunts-Verbitsky Lie algebra on the cohomology of an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X. In Section 2.2 we prove that if a real cohomology class of Hodge type (p,p) on such X remains a (p,p) class under all ﬁrst order classical deformations of X, then it remains a (p,p) class under all K¨ahler deformations of X.

2.1. The rational LLV lattice. Let U be the even unimodular rank 2 lattice with basis α, β { } consisting of isotropic elements satisfying (α, β)= 1. Set UQ := U Z Q. Following Taelman − ⊗ [Ta, Sec. 3.1] we define the rational LLV lattice3 of a 2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X to be the orthogonal direct sum 2 (2.1) H˜ (X, Q) := H (X, Q) UQ, ⊕ where the bilinear pairing on the first direct summand is the Beauville-Bogomolov-Fujiki (BBF) pairing normalized so that (2n)! λ2n = c (λ, λ)n, λ H2(X, Q), X 2nn! ∀ ∈ ZX where the Fujiki constant cX is a positive rational number such that the pairing ( , ) is integral, primitive, and positive on Kähler classes [O4, Sec. 2.1]. The Fujiki constant is• calculated• for all known irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds in [Ra]. If X is of K3[n]-type, then cX = 1, and if X is a deformation equivalent to a generalized Kummer of dimension 2n, then 2 cX = n+1. We endow H˜ (X, Q) with a weight 0 Hodge structure extending that of H (X, Q(1)) so that classes in UQ are of type (0, 0).

3Taelman calls this vector space the Rational Mukai lattice. We prefer to distinguish it from C˘ald˘araru’s Mukai lattice deﬁned in [Ca2, Ca3]. LLV is short for Looijenga-Lunts-Verbitsky, as this vector space ﬁrst appears in their work [LL, Ve3] 10 EYAL MARKMAN

2 Set g := so(H˜ (X, Q)). Let g¯ be the subalgebra so(H (X, Q)) of g annihilating UQ. Given a class λ H2(X, Q) denote by e the element of g given by ∈ λ (2.2) e (α)= λ, e (λ′) = (λ, λ′)β, λ′ H2(X, Q), and e (β) = 0. λ λ ∀ ∈ λ Example 2.1. Let X be the Hilbert scheme S[n] of length n subschemes of a K3 surface S. Let π : S[n] S(n) be the Hilbert Chow morphism. The composition of the isomorphism → H2(S, Z) = H2(Sn, Z)Sn = H2(S(n), Z) with π∗ : H2(S(n), Z) H2(S[n], Z) induces an iso- ∼ ∼ → metric embedding ι of H2(S, Z) into H2(S[n], Z) [Be]. Hence, there exists a unique extension of ι to an isometric embedding, denoted by ι as well, of H˜ (S, Q) into H˜ (S[n], Q) satisfying ι e = e ι, for all λ H2(S, Z). It satisﬁes ι(α)= α and ι(β)= β. ◦ λ ι(λ) ◦ ∈ ∗ ∗ k Let h : H (X, Q) H (X, Q) be the degree operator acting by k dimC(X) on H (X, Q). 2→ ∗ ∗ − Given a class ω H (X, Q), denote by Lω : H (X, Q) H (X, Q) the operator of cup product ∈ → ∗ ∗ with ω. If ω is a K¨ahler class then there exists an operator Λω : H (X, Q) H (X, Q), such ∗ → that the triple (Lω, h, Λω) spans a Lie subalgebra of gl(H (X, Q)) isomorphic to sl2, by the Hard-Lefschetz Theorem. Explicitly, we have [L , Λ ]= h, [L , h] = 2L , and [Λ , h]= 2Λ . w w w w w − w We say that (L , h, Λ ) is an sl -triple with respect to h. The set of classes ω H2(X, Q), for ω ω 2 ∈ which there exists a necessarily unique operator Λw satisfying the above relations, is a Zariski dense subset of H2(X, Q), by the Jacobson-Morozov Theorem. Theorem 2.2. ([LL, Prop. 4.5] and [Ve3]) There exists a unique isomorphism between the ∗ Lie algebra g := so(H˜ (X, Q)) and the subalgebra of gl(H (X, Q)) generated by all sl2-triples 2 (Lω, h, Λω), ω H (X, Q), which sends eλ to Lλ. The subalgebra of g preserving the grading of H∗(X, Q) is∈g¯ Qh. ⊕ The isomorphism in the above theorem is proved by Verbitsky and Looijenga-Luntz over R, but their proof goes through over Q [GKLR, Theorem 2.7].

2.2. Real (p,p)-classes. Let X be an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Lemma 2.3. Let α Hp,p(X, R) be a real class of Hodge type (p,p). Assume that α remains of Hodge type under∈ all first order deformations of X as a complex manifold. Then α remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation of X. Proof. Let I be the complex structure of X and let (2.3) f : H∗(X, R) H∗(X, R) I → p,q be the Hodge operator acting on H (X,I) by (q p)√ 1. Then fI belongs to g¯R := g¯ Q R, by [Ve1, Theorem 8.1]. Every Kähler deformation− of an− irreducible holomorphic symplectic⊗ manifold is an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold [Be]. Hence, if the class α is g¯- invariant, then it remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation. We prove the g¯- invariance of α in two steps. Step 1: The class α belongs to the kernel of all homomorphisms in the image of the natural homomorphism H1(X,TX) Hom(Hp,p(X),Hp−1,p+1(X)), → VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 11 since α remains of Hodge type under all first order deformations. The above homomorphism is the restriction of the contraction homomorphism ι : H1(X,TX) Hom(H∗(X, C),H∗(X, C)), → where ι , η H1(X,TX), maps Hp,q(X) to Hp−1,q+1(X). The image of the homomorphism ι η ∈ is contained in the subalgebra g¯C, by [GKLR, Lemma 4.5], so that ι factors through a homomorphism 1 ˜ι : H (X,TX) g¯C, → which we recall next4. Fix a Kähler metric on X, let I be the complex structure on X and let ωI := g(I , ) be the fundamental form. We get the twistor data consisting of complex structures J and• • K, compatible with g and satisfying the quaternionic relations IJ = K, as well as the Kähler forms ωJ := g(J( ), ) and ωK := g(K( ), ), such that σ := ωJ + √ 1ωK is a global holomorphic (2, 0)-form on• •X with respect to• the• complex structure I [Be].− Let ∗ LI gl(H (X, C)) be cup product with ωI , define LJ and LK similarly, and let ΛI , ΛJ , and Λ ∈be the adjoint Lefschetz operators. Set Λ := 1 (Λ √ 1Λ ). Given η H1(X,TX), let K σ 2 J − − K ∈ Lιη(σ) be cup product with the (1, 1)-class ιη(σ). Then ιη = [Lιη(σ), Λσ] and the latter belongs 1 to g¯C, so that ι factors through the homomorphism ˜ι sending η H (X,TX) to [L , Λ ], ∈ ιη(σ) σ by [GKLR, Lemma 4.5]. The Lie algebra so(H1,1(X)) is the subspace of Hom[H1,1(X),H1,1(X)] of anti-self-dual homomorphisms with respect to the BBF-pairing. The one-dimensional Lie algebra so(H2,0(X) H0,2(X)) is characterized similarly. Elements of so(H2,0(X) H0,2(X)) have traceless diagonal⊕ matrices in the basis σ, σ¯ . The complex structure I induces⊕ a weight zero Hodge structure on 2 C { } 1,1 g¯C ∼= so(H (X, )), the Hodge decomposition is so(H (X))-invariant, and the Hodge direct summands are the following so(H1,1(X))-modules:

−1,1 2,0 1,1 g¯ ∼= Hom(H (X),H (X)), 0,0 1,1 2,0 0,2 g¯ ∼= so(H (X)) so(H (X) H (X)) 1,−1 0,2 ⊕1,1 ⊕ g¯ ∼= Hom(H (X),H (X)). Note that Hom(H2,0(X),H1,1(X)) is isomorphic to Hom(H1,1(X),H0,2(X)) via the BBF pairing and g¯−1,1 is embedded in the direct sum of the two. A similar remark holds for g¯1,−1. The image of ι is equal to g¯−1,1 and so α is inﬁnitesimally invariant with respect to g¯−1,1, i.e., annihilated by it. The class α is assumed to be real. Hence, it is invariant with respect to the complex conjugate subalgebra g¯1,−1. It remains to prove that the two Lie subalgebras g¯−1,1 1,−1 and g¯ generate g¯C. Step 2: The Lie bracket induces the following homomorphism of so(H1,1(X))-modules:

(2.4) g¯−1,1 g¯1,−1 g¯0,0. ⊗ → Normalize σ so that (σ, σ¯) = 1. We have (ι (σ), ι (σ)) = (σ, ι (ι (σ))), since ι belongs to η1 η2 − η1 η2 η1 g¯C, and ι (ι (σ)) is a scalar multiple ofσ ¯. We conclude that ι (ι (σ)) = (ι (σ), ι (σ))¯σ. η1 η2 η1 η2 − η1 η2 Given η H1(T X), letι ¯ ( ) := ι (¯) be the complex conjugate element. Note that ι (¯σ) = 0 ∈ η • η • η

4 2 The homomorphism ˜ι is extended in Corollary 6.2 below to a homomorphism HT (X) → gC. 12 EYAL MARKMAN andι ¯ (σ) = 0. The following equalities thus hold for all η , η , η H1(T X). η 1 2 3 ∈

[ιη1 , ι¯η2 ](σ) = (ιη2 (σ), ιη1 (σ))σ, [ι , ι¯ ](¯σ) = (ι (σ), ι (σ))¯σ, η1 η2 − η1 η2 [ι , ι¯ ](ι (σ)) = (ι (σ), ι (σ))ι (σ) + (ι (σ), ι (σ))ι (σ). η1 η2 η3 − η2 η3 η1 η1 η3 η2 1 Choose η H (T X) so that ιη(σ) is a non-isotropic real (1, 1) class of self intersection t. We ∈ 1,1 see that [ιη, ι¯η](σ)= tσ, [ιη, ι¯η](¯σ)= tσ¯, and [ιη, ι¯η] annihilates H (X). Hence, [ιη, ι¯η] spans the trivial so(H1,1(X)) submodule so−(Hom[H2,0(X) H0,2(X)), and so the latter is contained in the image of (2.4). ⊕ Choose non-zero elements η , η H1(T X), so that each of ω := ι (σ), i = 1, 2, is real and 1 2 ∈ i ηi (ω1,ω2) = 0. Then [ιη1 , ι¯η2 ] annihilates both σ andσ ¯ and [ιη1 , ι¯η2 ](ω)= (ω2,ω)ω1 + (ω1,ω)ω2, 1,1 1,1 − for all ω H (X). Thus, [ιη1 , ι¯η2 ] is a non-zero element of so(H (X)). Thus, the image of (2.4) must∈ contain the irreducible so(H1,1(X))-submodule so(H1,1(X)) as well. Remark 2.4. The analogue of Lemma 2.3 when X is a n-dimensional complex torus holds as well, except that the conclusion is that the real (p,p) class α must vanish if 0

3. Stable reflexive sheaves with a rank 1 obstruction map are modular In Section 3.1 we prove that stable reflexive sheaves with a rank 1 obstruction map are modular (Theorem 3.4). In Section 3.2 we exhibit examples of coherent sheaves with a rank 1 obstruction map. Let X and Y be deformation equivalent irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds and F a stable reflexive coherent (untwisted) sheaf on X with obsF of rank 1. In Section 3.3 we provide a necessary and sufficient conditions for there to be a coherent (untwisted) sheaf E on Y , such that (Y, E) is related to (X, F ) by a sequence of deformations and tensorization by line bundles (Lemma 3.13). We then provide an easy to check sufficient condition in the K3[n] and generalized kummer deformation types (Lemma 3.16).

3.1. Proof of modularity. Let F be a coherent, possibly twisted, sheaf of positive rank r. We get the untwisted object G := F ⊗r det(F )∗ of rank rr in the derived category of X and we let κ(F ) H∗(X, Q) be the r-th root⊗ of ch(G) with value r in H0(X, Q), see [Ma4, Sec. 2.2] for a detailed∈ deﬁnition. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 13

An equivalence Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) of derived categories induces a graded isomorphism φ : HH∗(X) HH∗(Y ) of Hochschild→ cohomologies, by [Ca2]. Set HT k(X) := Hq(X, pT X). → ⊕p+q=k ∧ We have the graded Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism IHKR : HT ∗(X) HH∗(X). 2 2 1 0 2 → The space HT (X) = H ( X ) H (T X) H ( T X) parametrizes first order generalized deformations of the categoryO of coherent⊕ sheaves⊕ on∧ X, and also of Db(X) [To]. The Atiyah class of an object G in Db(X) is a class a in Hom(G, G Ω1 [1]) (see [Ka]). Let G ⊗ X a Hom(G, G Ωi [i]) be the i power of a . The exponential Atiyah class is G,i ∈ ⊗ X G exp a := a : G (G Ωi [i]). G ⊕i≥0 G,i →⊕i≥0 ⊗ X The contraction homomorphism (3.1) obsHT : HT 2(X) Hom(G, G[2]) G → 2 sends a class ξ HT (X) to the obstruction class ξ exp aG to first order deformation of G in the direction ∈ξ [To, Prop. 6.1]. Hence, if Hom(G, G·[2]) is one dimensional, then the kernel Σ(G) HT 2(X) has co-dimension at most one. ⊂ Given an object G in the bounded derived category Db(X) of a smooth projective variety 2 0 2 X, denote by Σ(G) HT (X) the kernel of (3.1). Note that Σ( X ) contains H ( T X) H1(T X), by the proof⊂ of [To, Lemma 4.3] in which Toda constructsO a first order deformation∧ of⊕ for each class in H0( 2T X) H1(T X). Given a closed point z X let be its sky-scraper OX ∧ ⊕ ∈ Oz sheaf and I its ideal sheaf. Now, Ext1( , Ω1 ) = H0( xt1 ( , )) Ω1 = End(T X), z Oz Oz ⊗ X ∼ E X Oz Oz ⊗ X,z ∼ z the Atiyah class a is the identity, and a is the identity endomorphism of 2(T X). Thus, Oz Oz,2 ∧ z Σ( )= H2(X, ) H1(X,TX) H0(X, ( 2T X) I ). Oz OX ⊕ ⊕ ∧ ⊗ z Hence, if X is an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold, then both Σ( X ) and Σ( z) have co-dimension 1 in HH2(X). O O The co-dimension of Σ(G) is one also for every object G over an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold Y , which is isomorphic to the image Φ(F ) of an object F with Σ(F ) of codimension one, via an equivalence of derived categories Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ), by [To, Theorem 4.7]. → Lemma 3.1. Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds and F an object in Db(X) of positive rank. Assume that the projection from HT 2(X) to its direct summand H1(T X) maps the intersection (3.2) Σ(F ) H2( ) H1(T X) ∩ OX ⊕ onto H1(T X). Then the class κ(F ) remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation of X. 1 2 Proof. Let β be an element of H (T X). There exists a class α H ( X ), such that the class (α, β, 0) HT 2(X) belongs to Σ(F ), by assumption. The object∈ F Odeforms in the direction (α, β, 0),∈ by [To, Prop. 6.1]. More precisely, there exists a perfect complex (i.e., locally quasi-isomorphic to a bounded complex of free modules) ofα ˜-twisted sheaves inF the category β β Mod( X , α˜) constructed in [To, Sec. 4], where X is the structure sheaf of the first order deformationO of X in the commutative directionOβ andα ˜ is the natural lift of α to a Brauer 2 X ∗ r class in H ( , X ). We get the rank 1 locally freeα ˜ -twisted X -module det( ) over , by [KM, TheoremX O 2], and the untwisted deformation det( )∗ (O∨)⊗r over ofF the objectX F ⊗ F X 14 EYAL MARKMAN

E := det(F )∗ (F ∨)⊗r. Hence, the class ch(E) remains of Hodge type in every direction β H1(T X).⊗ Thus, so does its r-th root κ(F ). The statement now follows from Lemma 2.3.∈ Remark 3.2. Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold and F an object of Db(X). We include the case where the rank of F is zero. If H1(T X) is contained in the kernel Σ(F ) of the obstruction map (3.1), then ch(F ) remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation of X, by the proof of Lemma 3.1. Proposition 3.3. Let Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) be an equivalence of derived categories of coherent sheaves of two projective irreducible→ holomorphic symplectic manifolds. Assume that an object G in Db(X) satisfies the following two conditions. (1) Σ(G) has co-dimension 1 in HT 2(X). (2) The rank of F := Φ(G) is positive. Then the class κ(F ) remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation of Y. Proof. The equality Σ(F ) = φ(Σ(G)) follows from [To, Theorem 4.7]. Hence, Σ(F ) has co- dimension 1 in HT 2(Y ), since Σ(G) is assumed to have co-dimension 1 in HT 2(X). We claim that the projection from HT 2(Y ) to its direct summand H1(TY ) maps the intersection Σ(F ) H2( ) H1(TY ) ∩ OY ⊕ onto H1(TY ). This surjectivity statement is equivalent to the condition that either the two 2 1 2 hyperplanes Σ(F ) and H ( Y ) H (Y,TY ) are equal, or H ( Y ) is not contained in Σ(F ). The obstruction map (3.1)O is defined⊕ as contraction with the exponentialO Atiyah class exp a Hom(F, F Ωi [i]), F ∈⊕i≥1 ⊗ Y 0 [To, Def. 5.5]. The direct summand of the latter in Hom(F, F ΩY [0]) = Hom(F, F ) is 2 ⊗ the identity. Hence, (3.1) restricts to H ( Y ) as the homomorphism u : Hom( Y , Y [2]) Hom(F, F [2]) induced by the unit natural transformationO from the identity functorO toO the com-→ position of the two adjoint functors of tensorization with F and F ∨. The composition of u with 2 2 2 the trace natural transformation tr : Ext (F, F ) H ( Y ) is multiplication of H ( Y ) by the rank r of F (see [HL, Lemma 10.1.3]). The obstruction→ O map (3.1) restricts to an injectiveO ho- 2 2 2 momorphism from H ( Y ) to Ext (F, F ), since r> 0, by assumption. Consequently, H ( Y ) is not contained in theO kernel Σ(F ) of (3.1). The statement now follows from Lemma 3.1. O Theorem 3.4. Let Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) be an equivalence of the derived categories of two projective irreducible holomorphic→ symplectic manifolds X and Y . Let F be a reflexive sheaf of rank r > 0, which is H-slope-stable with respect to every ample line-bundle H in some open subcone of the ample cone of Y . Assume that F is isomorphic to Φ(G), where Σ(G) has co- dimension one5 in HT 2(X). Then for every irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold Z deformation equivalent to Y there exists a possibly twisted coherent sheaf E over Z and a flat deformation of the pair (Y, F ) to the pair (Z,E). Proof. A Λ-marking for an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold Y is an isometry η : H2(Y, Z) Λ with a lattice Λ. There exists a moduli space M of Λ-marked irreducible → Λ 5 G could be, for example, OX , or the sky-scraper sheaf Op for some point p in X, or ι∗OZ for a lagrangian embedding ι : Z → X as in Example 3.8. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 15 holomorphic symplectic manifolds, which is a non-Hausdorff manifold of dimension b2(Y ) 2 (see [Hu1]). Choose an isometry η : H2(Y, Z) Λ with a fixed lattice Λ. Denote by M0 −the → Λ connected component of the moduli space MΛ containing (Y, η). By assumption, there exists ′ 2 ′ 0 an isometry η : H (Z, Z) Λ, such that (Z, η ) belongs to MΛ. Associated to every Kähler → 1 0 1 class ω on Y is a twistor line Pω in MΛ through (Y, η) and a twistor family ω Pω, such 1 Y →0 that its fiber t over t Pω represents the isomorphism class t as a point of MΛ [Hu1]. A Y ∈ ′ 0 twistor path from (Y, η) to (Z, η ) is a connected sequence of twistor lines in MΛ, such that every two consecutive lines intersect. A choice of an intersection point of every two consecutive lines is included in the data of the twistor path. If the chosen intersection points of every two consecutive lines are pairs (Yi, ηi) such that Pic(Yi) is trivial, then the twistor path is said to ′ 0 be generic. There exists a generic twistor path γ from (Y, η) to (Z, η ) in MΛ, such that its first twistor line corresponds to a Kähler class ω on Y with respect to which F is slope-stable, by [Ve3, Theorems 3.2 and 5.2e] and the assumption that F is slope-stable with respect to all ample classes in an open subcone of the ample cone. Let π : γ be the twistor deformation of Y over the twistor path γ. The first Chern class of every directY → summand of nd(F ) vanishes, since F is assumed H-stable, and so nd(F ) is H-semistable, with respect toE every H in an E open subcone of the ample cone of Y , see [Ma4, Lemma 7.2]. The class κ2(F ) remains of Hodge type along γ, by Proposition 3.3. Hence, the sheaf F extends to a reflexive twisted sheaf over the twistor deformation over the twistor line γ, by the generalization [Ma4, Prop. 6.17]F to the case of twisted reflexiveY sheaves of results of Verbitsky [Ve5] for reflexive sheaves. We let E be the restriction of to the fiber of π over the point (Z, η′) of the twistor path γ. F Remark 3.5. (1) The analogues of Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 3.3 hold when X is a complex torus if we replace the assumption that Σ(G) has codimension 1 by the assumption that Σ(G) has codimension equal to h0,2(X) := dim(H2,0(X)). The analogue of Theorem 3.4 holds as well if X is even dimensional (and so admits a hyperkähler structure). The proof of Lemma 3.1 is identical using Remark 2.4 instead of Lemma 2.3. The proof 2 of Proposition 3.3 shows that the restriction of exp aF to H ( Y ) is injective, and so 2 O 2 1 H ( Y ) intersect Σ(F ) trivially. Hence, the intersection Σ(F ) [H ( Y ) H (TY )] againO projects onto H1(TY ) and the hypothesis of Lemma 3.1 is∩ satisfied.O ⊕ The rest of the proof of Proposition 3.3 is identical. The proof of Theorem 3.4 is analogous, using the same result of Verbitsky and the twistor path connectivity of the moduli space of even dimensional complex tori [BI]. (2) Following are examples of sheaves G over abelian varieties X for which the codimension of Σ(G) is h0,2(X). Over an abelian surface every simple sheaf is an example. Examples of such sheaves over compact complex tori of dimension > 2 include the sky scraper sheaf, a line bundle on X, the structure sheaf of a connected abelian subvariety, as well as their images under Fourier-Mukai transformations. When locally free sheaves, these images are semi-homogeneous vector bundles. Recall that a vector bundle F on X is semi-homogeneous, if every translate of F by a point of X is isomorphic to F L, for some line bundle L Pic0(X). If F is a simple semi-homogeneous vector bundle⊗ over an abelian variety X∈, then it is stable and dim Ext2(F, F ) = h0,2(X), by [Mu3, Theorem 5.8]. In particular, one gets via the analogue of Proposition 3.3 (with Φ the identity endo-functor) an alternative proof of the fact that the graded summands κ (F ) Hp,p(X) of the class κ(F ) of a simple semi-homogeneous vector bundle F p ∈ 16 EYAL MARKMAN

vanishes for 0

1 otherwise, that H (T X) is contained in the kernel of the obstruction map. Then ch(ι∗ Z ) remains of Hodge type in the direction of every ξ H1(T X), by Remark 3.2. Hence,O so does the cohomology class [Z] Hn,n(X, Z) of ι(Z),∈ since [Z] is a graded direct summand of ∈ ch(ι∗ Z ). Let TZX be the subsheaf of T X of vector ﬁelds which are tangent to ι(Z). So TZ X is theO kernel in the short exact sequence 0 T X T X ι (N ) 0. → Z → → ∗ Z/X → 1 H (X, TZ X) is the space of ﬁrst order complex deformations of the pair (X, ι(Z)). It is known that the pair (X, ι(Z)) deforms with X over a co-dimension 1 smooth locus in the local Kuranishi deformation space of X and the sequence

c (L) H1(X, T X) H1(X,TX) 1 H2(X, ) 0 Z → → OX → is exact, where L is the line bundle on X such that the kernel of H2(X, C) H2(Z, C) is → orthogonal to c1(L) via the BBF-pairing [Vo1, Cor. 1.2]. In particular, the left homomorphism above has a one-dimensional co-kernel. Furthermore, the cohomology class [Z] remains of Hodge 1 type in a direction ξ H (T X), if and only if c1(L) does [Vo1, Cor. 1.4]. A contradiction. We 2 ∈ 2 conclude that Ext (ι∗ Z , ι∗ Z ) does not vanish and Σ(ι∗ Z ) has co-dimension 1 in HT (X). O O O

Remark 3.10. (1) Let X bea2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold, Z an n-dimensional compact complex manifold, and ι : Z ֒ X an embedding as a → k j lagrangian submanifold. Let be a line bundle on Z satisfying ∼= ωZ for some K K HT integers j, k with k = 0. Set F := ι∗ . We expect the obstruction map obsF , given in (3.1), to have rank 16 whenever the restrictionK homomorphism H2(X, C) H2(Z, C) has rank 1. The latter condition is equivalent to the homomorphism H1,1→(X) H1,1(Z) having rank 1. Equivalently, the homomorphism H1(X,TX) H1(Z,N →), induced → Z/X by the sheaf homomorphism T X ι∗NZ/X , has rank 1, as the symplectic structure of X induces a commutative diagram→

T X / ι∗NZ/X

=∼ =∼ 1 1 ΩX / ι∗ΩZ.

2 HT The domain HT (X) of obsF admits a direct sum decomposition by deﬁnition and its co-domain Ext2(F, F ) decomposes as a direct sum Hp(X, qN ), by the p+q=2 ∧ Z/X degeneration of the local-to-global spectral sequence at the 2E-page [Ml, Theorem 0.1.3]. L The homomorphism H2(X, ) H2(X, xt0 (ι , ι )) = H2(Z, ) vanishes, due OX → E X ∗K ∗K ∼ OZ to Z being lagrangian. The sheaf homomorphism T X ι∗NZ/X induces the zero homomorphism → H0(X, 2T X) H0(Z, 2N ) = H0(Z, xt2 (ι , ι )), ∧ → ∧ Z/X ∼ E X ∗K ∗K again due to Z being lagrangian. However, the obstruction map (3.1) need not factor through the direct sum of the above homomorphisms. 18 EYAL MARKMAN

(2) In order to prove that the obstruction map has rank 1 it suffices to prove that the image of H0(X, 2T X) via the obstruction map is contained in the image of H1(X,TX). 2∧ When ∼= ωZ the deformation quantization result of [DS] seems to suggest that H0(X, K2T X) is contained in the kernel of the obstruction map and so the latter has ∧ ∗ rank 1. It follows that whenever a square root of ωZ belongs to the image of ι Pic(X) HT ∗ → Pic(Z), then the obstruction map obsF has rank 1 for F = ι∗ι L, for every L Pic(X), ∗ 2 −1 ∈ b since if ι (L0) = ωZ, then tensorization by L L0 is an auto-equivalnce of D (X) ∗ ∼ ∗ ⊗ ∗ mapping ι∗ι L0 to ι∗ι L and so the rank of the obstruction map for F = ι∗ι L is equal ∗ to that for F = ι∗ι L0. (3) If Z is a lagrangian connected component of the fixed locus of a finite group G acting on X, then the image of H0(X, 2T X) via the obstruction map obsHT vanishes and ∧ ι∗OZ the obstruction map has rank 1. This is seen as follows. The universal Atiyah class aX is the extension class of the short exact sequence (3.3) 0 I /I2 /I2 /I 0 → ∆X ∆X → OX×X ∆X → OX×X ∆X → over X X. It induces a natural transformation from the identity endofunctor of Db(X) × 1 1 to the endofunctor of tensorization by ΩX [1]. We denote by aF Hom(F, F ΩX[1]) the b ∈ 1 ⊗ ∗ 1 value of aX at an object F of D (X). The Atiyah class aι∗OZ ExtX (ι∗ Z , ι∗ι (ΩX )) is thus the extension class of the short exact sequence of -modules∈ O OX (3.4) 0 ι ι∗(Ω1 ) E ι 0, → ∗ X → → ∗OZ → involving the Fourier-Mukai transforms of ι∗ Z with respect to the objects in (3.3). Note that the scheme theoretic support of E is theO (non-reducded) first order neighborhood of Z in X. The exact sequence (3.4) decomposes as a direct sum of (a) the short exact sequence of the G-invariant direct summands, 0 ι Ω1 EG ι 0, → ∗ Z → → ∗OZ → and (b) the short exact sequence 0 N ∗ N ∗ 0 0. Hence, a : ι → Z/X → Z/X → → ι∗OZ ∗OZ → ι ι∗Ω1 [1] factors through a morphism6 ι ι Ω1 [1] via the inclusion of ι Ω1 [1] as ∗ X ∗OZ → ∗ Z ∗ Z the G-invariant direct summand of ι ι∗Ω1 [1]. It follows that a : ι ι ι∗Ω2 [2] ∗ X ι∗OZ ,2 ∗OZ → ∗ X factors through the direct summand ι Ω2 [2] and so the image of H0(X, 2T X) via the ∗ Z ∧ obstruction map (3.1) vanishes, since the homomorphism ι∗Ω2 induced by an X → OZ element of the non-trivial 1-dimensional G-representation H0(X, 2T X) vanishes on 2 ∧ the G-invariant direct summand ΩZ. (4) We will verify in Lemma 7.3 that the rank of the cohomological obstruction map is 1 (a condition slightly weaker than the rank of the obstruction map being 1) in some examples of lagrangian surfaces. Example 3.11. Following are examples of embeddings ι : Z X of holomorphic lagrangian submanifolds Z with a rank 1 restriction homomorphism ι∗→: H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z) even though the second Betti number of Z is larger than 1. → (1) Z is a lagrangian complex torus. In this case the kernel of H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z) is ⊥ → c1(L) , for a line bundle L with isotropic c1(L) [W]. For a generic pair (X,Z) some

6 This morphism corresponds to the extension class as OX -modules and is diﬀerent in general from the extension class as OZ -modules. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 19

d ∗ power d of the line bundle L is base point free and the morphism ϕLd : X L is a lagrangian fibration onto its image with fiber Z [GLR]. Hence, [Z] is a scalar→ | multiple| n [n] of c1(L) , where n = dim(X)/2. If X is of K3 -type, then d = 1 and ϕL is surjective, n so [Z]= c1(L) , by [Ma5]. (2) Let W be a 6 dimensional complex vector space and let V P(W ) be a smooth cubic ⊂ fourfold. Let X be the Fano variety of lines on V . Then X is of K3[2]-type, by [BD]. Let Z be the Fano variety of lines on a smooth hyperplane section of V . Then Z is a lagrangian surface in X, by [Vo1]. The Hodge numbers of Z are h1,0 = 5, h2,0 = 10, and h1,1 = 25, and χ(Z) = 27, by [CG, Eq. (9.5), (9.12), and (10.12)]. Note that Z is the zero subscheme of a regular section of τ ∗, where τ is the restriction to X of ∗ the tautological rank 2 subbundle over Gr(2, 6). Hence, [Z] = c2(τ ). Let L be the restriction to X of the ample generator of Pic(Gr(2, 6)). The restriction of L to Z is the canonical line bundle of Z, by [CG, Prop. 10.3]. We have (c1(L), c1(L)) = 6. One can show that [Z] = 1 (5c (L)2 c (T X)). Ifτ ˜ : W W is an involution with a 8 1 − 2 → 5-dimensional 1-eigenspace W + and V isτ ˜-invariant and we choose Z to be the Fano variety of lines on V P(W +), then Z is a connected component of the fixed locus of the ∩ 2 2 restriction τ : X X ofτ ˜ and so the obstruction map HT (X) Ext (ι∗ Z , ι∗ Z ) given in (3.1) has→ rank 1, by Remark 3.10(3). → O O An example of an immersion of a smooth surface as a lagrangian subvariety in X of ∗ class 63c2(τ ) with a finite number of self intersection points is studied in [IM1]. [2] (3) Let X be of K3 -type admitting an ample line-bundle L satisfying (c1(L), c1(L)) = 2. The generic such X admits an anti-symplectic involution. O’Grady proved that its fixed locus, which is a lagrangian surface Z, embeds in L ∗ as a smooth surface of degree 40 | | 2 1 and Euler characteristic 192 [O1]. One can show that [Z] = 5c1(L) 3 c2(T X). The 2 2 − obstruction map HT (X) Ext (ι∗ Z , ι∗ Z ) given in (3.1) has rank 1, by Remark 3.10(3). → O O

Example 3.12. Let X be a K3 surface containing a smooth rational curve C, let δ : X X X → × be the diagonal embedding, and let πi, i = 1, 2, be the projection from X X onto the i-th factor. The shift [1] of the ideal sheaf of the diagonal ∆ := δ(X) is quasi-isomorphic× to I∆ the complex := [ X×X δ∗ X ], with δ∗ X in degree 0, and the latter is the Fourier- P O → O O L P ∗ b Mukai kernel of the auto-equivalence Φ := Rπ1,∗ ( Lπ1( )) of D (X) known as the P ◦ P ⊗ • spherical twist by the spherical object X [ST]. Φ ( X (C)) is isomorphic to the co-kernel of 0 O O the evaluation homomorphism H (X, X (C)) C X X (C) and is thus the push-forward ι N of the normal bundle of C byO the inclusion⊗ O ι :→C O X. Thus, the composition of ΦP ∗ C/X → with tensorization by (C) is an auto-equivalence Ψ of the derived category of X which maps OX to ι N . Note the isomorphism ι N = ι ω . Clearly, the latter sheaf deforms with OX ∗ C/X ∗ C/X ∼ ∗ C X only over the locus in the moduli space where the class of C in H2(X, C) remains of Hodge type. In this case we have

Σ(Ψ( )) H2( ) H1(T X) = Σ(ι ω ) H2( ) H1(T X) = H2( ) [C]⊥, OX ∩ OX ⊕ ∗ C ∩ OX ⊕ OX ⊕ where [C]⊥ is the hyperplane of H1(T X) along which C remains of type (1, 1). The second equality above si due to the fact that the right hand side is the unique hyperplane of H2( ) OX ⊕ H1(T X) projecting onto [C]⊥. 20 EYAL MARKMAN

3.3. When can a modular sheaf on X be deformed to an untwisted sheaf on Y ? Let X and Y be deformation equivalent irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds. Let E be HT be a reflexive sheaf of positive rank r on X with a rank 1 obstruction map obsE , given in (3.1). Assume that E is slope-stable with respect to Kähler classes in an open subcone of the Kähler cone of X. Then E can be deformed to a twisted sheaf F over Y , by Theorem 3.4. When can the Azumaya algebra nd(E) be deformed to the Azumaya algebra nd(F ) of an E E untwisted sheaf F over Y ? The answer depends on c1(E) and Pic(Y ). Lemma 3.13 provides a general necessary and sufficient condition and Lemma 3.16 provides a condition in a form easier to check for Y of K3[n] or generalized Kummer deformation type. Lemma 3.13. There exists an untwisted reflexive sheaf F such that (Y, nd(F )) is deformation equivalent to (X, nd(E)), if and only if there exists a parallel transportE operator 2 2 E 2 1,1 g : H (X, Z) H (Y, Z), such that g(c1(E)) + rH (Y, Z) belongs to the image of H (Y, Z) in H2(Y, Z)/rH→2(Y, Z). Proof. The existence of such a parallel-transport operator g is clearly necessary. We prove that it is sufficient. Assume first that F is locally free. Let µr be the group of r-th roots of unity. Denote by µr also the associated trivial local system over X. Let θ˜ : H1 (X,PGL ( )) H2(X,µ ) an r O → r be the connecting homomorphism of the short exact sequence 0 µ SL ( ) P GL ( ) 0. → r → r O → r O → The projective bundle P(E) determines a class [P(E)] in H1(X,PGL ( )). The exponential r O function exp : C C∗ maps the subgroup 2πi Z of C onto µ and induces the homomorphism → r r 2πi exp : H2 X, Z H2(X,µ ). r → r The following equality is proved in [HSc, Lemma 2.5] 2πi (3.5) θ˜([P(E)]) = exp c (E) . r 1 2 Choose an isometry η : H (X, Z) Λ with a fixed lattice Λ. Let MΛ be the moduli space of marked irreducible holomorphic symplectic→ manifolds recalled in the proof of Theorem 3.4. 0 0 Let MΛ be the connected component of MΛ containing (X, η). Then (Y, g η) belongs to MΛ, since g is a parallel-transport operator. Choose a generic twistor path γ from◦ (X, η) to (Y, g η) with first twistor line associated to a Kähler class with respect to which F is slope-stable. Then◦ P(E) deforms along γ to a projective bundle B with 2πi (3.6) θ˜([B]) = exp g(c (E)) . r 1 ∗ Let ι : µr X be the inclusion. There exists a locally free sheaf F over Y with P(F )= B, if → O ˜ 2 ∗ and only if the Brauer class ι(θ(B)) Han(Y, ) of B vanishes. This is the case, if and only ˜ ∈ O 1 ∗ 2 if θ([B]) belongs to the image of the connecting homomorphism δ : Han(Y, ) Han(Y,µr) of the short exact sequence O → ι (•)r 0 µ ∗ ∗ 0. → r → OY → OY → VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 21

This is the case, if and only if there exists a line bundle L Pic(Y ), such that the class c (L) g(c (E)) belong to rH2(Y, Z), as seen from the commutative∈ diagram 1 − 1 [L] θ([B])

r (•) δ ι 0 / H1(Y, ∗) / H1(Y, ∗) / H1(Y,µ ) / H2(Y, ∗) O O r O c1 =∼ c1 =∼ =∼ 2 Z 2 Z 2 Z Z 0 / H (Y, ) ·r / H (Y, ) / H (Y, /r )

2 c1(L) c1(L)+ rH (Y, Z) and the fact that the right vertical isomorphism above maps the right hand side of (3.6) to 2 g(c1(E)) + rH (Y, Z). The above argument goes through even if E is reﬂexive, but not locally free, since then E is locally free away from a closed analytic subset Z of co-dimension 3. In that case Poincare and Lefschetz dualities yield the commutative diagram whose vertical≥ arrows are isomorphisms.

=∼ H4n−2(X, Z) / H4n−2(X,Z, Z)

=∼ P.D. L.D. =∼ H2(X, Z) / H2(X Z, Z), \ where 2n is the complex dimension of X. The top horizontal arrow is an isomorphism as well, since H4n−k(Z, Z) vanishes for k < 6. Hence, the bottom vertical arrow is an isomorphism 2 2 as well. Consequently, the restriction homomorphism H (X,µr) H (X Z,µr) is an iso- P 2 → \ morphism as well and the classσ ˜( (E|X\Z )) H (X Z,µr) is the restriction of the class 2πi 2 ′∈ \ exp c1(E) in H (X,µr). Similarly,σ ˜(P(F )) is the restriction of the parallel transport r |Y \Z′ 2πi 2 ′ exp r g(c1(E)) in H (Y,µr). where Z is the singular locus of the deformed twisted reﬂexive sheaf F ′ along the twistor path γ, by [Ma4, Construction 6.9]. Deﬁnition 3.14. Let Λ be a lattice. A non-zero class λ Λ is primitive, if the rank 1 lattice ∈ spanZ λ is saturated in Λ. The divisibility div(λ) of a primitive class λ of Λ is the greatest common{ } divisor of (λ, λ′) : λ′ Λ . { ∈ } Let L be a lattice. Denote by O(L) the subgroup of isometries acting trivially on the dis- ∗ criminant group L /L. Let O+(L) be the subgroup of isometries preserving the orientation of the positive cone [Ma3, Sec. 4]. Lete SO(L) be the subgroup of isometries with determinant 1. Denote by SO+(L) the intersection of these three subgroups. Lemma 3.15. Let X be an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of K3[n]-type or gen- e eralized Kummer deformation type of dimension 2n, n 2, and let α be a primitive class in H2(X, Z) with div(α) = 1 or 2. Then the Mon2(X)-orbit≥ of α is determined by (α, α) and div(α). 22 EYAL MARKMAN

Proof. The assumption on div(α) determines the image of (α, )/div(α) in the discriminant group H2(X, Z)∗/H2(X, Z), since the latter is cyclic of even order,• so contains a unique element of order 2. Eichler’s criterion then implies that the O(H2(X, Z))-orbit of α is determined by div(α) and (α, α) [GHS, Lemma 3.5]. It remains to prove that the Mon2(X)-orbit of α is equal to the O(H2(X, Z)-orbit of α. The discriminante group H2(X, Z)∗/H2(X, Z) is cyclic of even order and The Mon2(X)-orbit of α is contained in the O(H2(X, Z)-orbit of α, since both 2 2 2 (α, α) and div(e α) are Mon (X)-invariant. Now Mon (X) contains SO+(H (X, Z)), by [Ma8, Cor. 1.8] and [Ma9, Theorem 1.4]. Hence, it suffices to provee that the O(H2(X, Z))-orbit and 2 ⊥ SO+(H (X, Z))-orbit of α are equal. The orthogonal complement α eof every class α contains 2 a copy of a unimodular rank 2 even lattice U of signature (1, 1) and O(Ue) and SO+(H (X, Z)) generatee O(H2(X, Z), where we embed O(U) as a subgroup of O(H2(X, Z) stabilizing α by extending each isometry via the identity on U ⊥. Hence, indeed, the O(H2(X,eZ))-orbit and 2 SO+(H (X,e Z))-orbit of α are equal. e e We provide next a sufficient condition for the existence of a parallel transport operator as in e Lemma 3.13 in a special case. Let X and Y be deformation equivalent 2n-dimensional, n 2, irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds of K3[n]-type or of generalized Kummer type.≥ Let E be the sheaf in Lemma 3.13 and r its rank. Write c1(E) = aα, such that α is a primitive class in H2(X, Z). Set ρ := r/ gcd(a, r). Lemma 3.16. Assume that gcd(ρ, div(α)) is 1 or 2. There exists a reflexive sheaf F on Y , such that (Y, nd(F )) is deformation equivalent to (X, nd(E)) if and only if there exist a primitive class β E H1,1(Y, Z) and an integer k satisfying gcd(E k, ρ) = 1, ∈ (3.7) gcd(ρ, div(β)) = gcd(ρ, div(α)), (β, β) (α, α) (3.8) k2 (mod ρ). 2 ≡ 2 Note that div(α) and div(β) divide 2n 2 in the K3[n]-type case and they divide 2n +2 in − the generalized Kummer case. In the K3[2]-type case the condition that gcd(ρ, div(α)) is 1 or 2 is automatically satisfied. Proof. Such F exists, if and only if there exists a parallel-transport operator g : H2(X, Z) H2(Y, Z), such that g(aα)+ rH2(X, Z) = bβ + rH2(Y, Z), for some integer b and a primitive→ class β H1,1(Y, Z), by Lemma 3.13. The order of the left hand side coset is r/ gcd(a, r) and the order∈ of the right hand side coset is r/ gcd(b, r). Hence, two integers a and b satisfying the a b latter equality must satisfy gcd(a, r) = gcd(b, r) and so gcd(a,r) and gcd(a,r) are both invertible modulo ρ. Furthermore, the equation of cosets above is equivalent to a b g(α)+ ρH2(X, Z)= β + ρH2(Y, Z) gcd(a, r) gcd(a, r) The latter equality is equivalent to (3.9) g(α)+ ρH2(X, Z)= kβ + ρH2(Y, Z), a for some integer k satisfying gcd(k, ρ) = 1, by the invertibility of gcd(a,r) modulo ρ. Equations (3.7) and (3.8) follow from Equation (3.9). Hence, if a sheaf F satisfying the condition of the VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 23

Lemma exists, then an integer k and a class β H1,1(Y, Z) satisfying the conditions of the Lemma exist as well. ∈ Conversely, assume that an integer k and a class β H1,1(Y, Z) satisfying the conditions of the Lemma exist. We prove the existence of a sheaf F∈by proving that there exists a parallel- transport operator g : H2(X, Z) H2(Y, Z) satisfying Equation (3.9). → 2 Step 1: We prove ﬁrst that there exists a class α1 H (X, Z), such that div(α + ρα1) = gcd(ρ, div(α)). There exists a class λ H2(X, Z), such∈ that gcd((α, λ), ρ) = gcd(ρ, div(α)). Choose x,y Z, such that x(α, λ)+ yρ∈ = gcd(ρ, div(α)). There exists a class δ H2(X, Z), such that δ⊥∈is unimodular isomorphic to the orthogonal direct sum U ⊕3 (generalized∈ Kummer ⊕3 ⊕2 [n] case) or U E8( 1) (K3 -type case), where U is the even unimodular rank 2 lattice of ⊕ − ′ ′′ ′ ⊥ signature (1, 1) and E8( 1) is the negative deﬁnite E8 lattice. Write λ = λ + λ with λ δ and λ′′ Zδ. Decompose−α = α′ +α′′ similarly. We may and do choose λ so that the saturation∈ ∈ ′ ′ ⊥ of the lattice spanned by λ and α is isometric to U. Indeed, choose a sublattice U0 of δ ′ ′ ′ ′ isometric to U containing α . Then there exists an element u of U0, such that (u, α ) = (λ , α ) and so we can replace λ by u + λ′′. Now α′, λ′, δ ⊥ contains a copy of U and so it contains { } classes α1 and α2 with (α1, α2)= y. Then div(α + ρα1) = gcd(ρ, div(α)), since

(α + ρα1, xλ + α2)= x(α, λ)+ ρ(α1, α2) = gcd(ρ, div(α)). 2 Step 2: There exists a class β1 H (Y, Z), such that div(β+ρβ1) = gcd(ρ, div(β)), by Step 1. ∈ 2 Setα ˜ = α + ρα1 and β˜ := β + ρβ1. The Mon (X)-orbit ofα ˜ consists of primitive classes λ with (λ, λ)=(˜α, α˜) and div(λ) = div(α), by Lemma 3.15. Similarly, the Mon2(Y )-orbit of β˜ consists of primitive classes λ with (λ, λ) = (β,˜ β˜) and div(λ) = div(β). Let f : H2(X, Z) H2(Y, Z) be a parallel-transport operator. There exists a class δ H2(Y, Z), such that δ⊥ is unimodular.→ ⊥ ∈ Set Λ2 := δ . Fix k solving the congruence (3.8). Then there exist integers x, y satisfying (˜α, α˜) k2(β,˜ β˜) − = xk + yρ, 2ρ since gcd(k, ρ) = 1. Case div(β˜) = 1: In this case δ⊥ contains classes in the Mon2(Y )-orbit of β˜. So β˜⊥ contains classes in the Mon2(Y )-orbit of δ and we may choose δ so that (β,˜ δ) = 0. Let T be the rank 2 lattice with basis t ,t satisfying { 1 2} (t ,t ) (t ,t ) (β,˜ β˜) x 1 1 1 2 = . (t ,t ) (t ,t ) x 2y 2 1 2 2 There exists a primitive embedding τ : T Λ such that τ(t )= β˜, by results of Nikulin (see → 2 1 [Ma8, Lemma 8.1]. Then γ := kβ˜ + ρτ(t2) is a primitive class of Λ2 satisfying (γ, γ)=(˜α, α˜). 2 Furthermore, div(γ) = 1, since Λ2 is unimodular. Hence, there exists an element h of Mon (Y ), 2 + such that h(f(˜α)= γ and h(f(δ)) = f(δ), since Mon (Y ) contains SO (Λ2), by [Ma8, Theorem 1.2] and [Ma9, Theorem 1.4]. So g := h f is a parallel-transport operator satisfying Equation (3.9). ◦ Case div(β˜) = 2: The Mon2(Y )-orbit of β˜ contains a class of the form 2β˜′ + δ, where β˜′ is ′ a primitive class in Λ2, by Lemma 3.15. Hence, we may assume that β˜ = 2β˜ + δ is of this form, possibly after modifying the choice of δ. Let T be the rank 2 lattice with basis t ,t { 1 2} 24 EYAL MARKMAN satisfying (t ,t ) (t ,t ) (β˜′, β˜′) x/2 1 1 1 2 = . (t ,t ) (t ,t ) x/2 2y 2 1 2 2 ′ There exists a primitive embedding τ : T Λ2 such that τ(t1) = β˜ , by results of Nikulin → ′ (see [Ma8, Lemma 8.1]. Then γ := kβ˜ + ρτ(t2) = (2kβ˜ + ρτ(t2)) + kδ is a primitive class satisfying (γ, γ)=(˜α, α˜). We claim that div(γ) = 2. Indeed, 2 divides div(γ), since ρ is even, ′ as gcd(ρ, div(β)) = 2. In addition, div(α) divides 2, since kβ˜ + (ρ/2)τ(t2) is a primitive class of 2 Λ2 and Λ2 is unimodular. Hence, there exists an element h of Mon (Y ), such that h(f(˜α)) = γ, by Lemma 3.15. Setting g := h f we get a parallel-transport operator satisfying Equation (3.9). ◦

Given a K3 surface S, let S(n) be its n-th symmetric power and let (3.10) θ : H2(S, Z) H2(S[n], Z) → 2 Z 2 (n) Z be the composition of the isomorphism H (S, ) ∼= H (S , ) with the pull-back homomorphism H2(S(n), Z) H2(S[n], Z) via the Hilbert-Chow morphism. → Example 3.17. Let X = S[2], S a K3 surface, and let E be the vector bundle G[2] over S[2] associated to a stable and rigid vector bundle G of rank r0 on S as in Theorem 1.4. Let δ H2(S[2], Z) be half the class of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes. Then c (E) = ∈ 1 r θ(c (G)) r0(r0−1) δ, by [O2, Prop. 5.8]. If v(G) = (r , c (G),s), then (v(G), v(G)) = 2, and 0 1 − 2 0 1 − so (c1(G),c1(G)) = sr 1. Assume that c (G) is a primitive class. If r is odd, then c (E)= r α, 2 0 − 1 0 1 0 where α = θ(c (G)) r0−1 δ is a primitive class of divisibility 1 satisfying 1 − 2 (α, α) (c (G), c (G)) r 1 2 r 1 2 (3.11) = 1 1 0 − = sr 1 0 − . 2 2 − 2 0 − − 2 If r0 is even, then c1(E) = (r0/2)α, where α = 2θ(c1(G)) (r0 1)δ is a primitive class of divisibility 2 satisfying − − (α, α) = 2(c (G), c (G)) (r 1)2 = 4sr 4 (r 1)2 . 2 1 1 − 0 − 0 − − 0 −

If r0 = 2 and c1(G) is primitive, then c1(E) = 2θ(c1(G)) 3δ is a primitive class of divisibility 2. So ρ = rank(E) = 4. An untwisted vector bundle− F exists on an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of K3[2]-type Y , such that (S[2], P(E)) is deformation equivalent to (Y, P(F )), if and only if there exists a primitive class β H1,1(Y, Z) of divisibility 2, by Lemma 3.16. Here we use the fact that if div(β) = 2, then∈ (β, β) 6 modulo 8 and if gcd(k, 4) = 1, then k2 1 modulo 4, so the congruence (3.8) is automatically≡ satisﬁed. ≡ If r0 = 3 and c1(G) is primitive, then c1(E) = 3α, where α = θ(c1(G)) δ is a primitive class of divisibility 1 satisfying (α, α)/2 1 (mod 3), by Equation (3.11). So− rank(E)=9 and ρ = 3. An untwisted vector bundle F exists≡ on an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of K3[2]-type Y , such that (S[2], P(E)) is deformation equivalent to (Y, P(F )), if and only if there exists a primitive class β H1,1(Y, Z) (with no constraint on its divisibility), such that (β, β)/2 1 (mod 3), by Lemma∈ 3.16. Note: The congruence condition (β, β)/2 1 (mod 3) follows also≡ from Remark 1.5 and Equation (9.3), which imply that 5 + 2(β, β) ≡0 (mod 3). ≡ VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 25

4. The BKR equivalence Let S be a smooth projective surface. We review in this section the equivalence between the equivariant derived category of coherent sheaves on the n-th cartesian product Sn and the derived category of coherent sheaves on the Hilbert scheme S[n]. This equivalence relies on results of Bridgeland-King-Ried [BKR] and Haiman [Hai]. Let X be a smooth projective variety on which a ﬁnite group G acts. A G-linearization ∗ of a coherent sheaf E on X is given by isomorphisms λg : E g E, for g G, satisfying λ = id and λ = h∗(λ ) λ . A morphism of linearized sheaves→ f : (E , λ ∈) (E , λ ) is 1 E gh g ◦ h 1 1 → 2 2 an -module homomorphism f : E E satisfying f = λ−1 g∗(f) λ , for all g G. We OX 1 → 2 2,g ◦ ◦ 1,g ∈ get the abelian category of G-linearized coherent sheaves, whose bounded derived category is b denoted by DG(X) [BKR, P]. Let (X, G) and (X′, G′) be smooth projective varieties with group actions. An equivariant morphism from (X, G) to (X′, G′) consists of a morphism f : X X′ and a group homomorphism ϕ : G G′ satisfying f g = ϕ(g) f, for all g G.→ We get the derived pullback ∗ b→ ′ b ◦ ◦ ∈ L(f, ϕ) : DG′ (X ) DG(X). When ϕ is surjective we get also the derived pushforward G b → b ′ ′ R(f, ϕ)∗ : DG(X) DG′ (X ) [P, Sec. 1.3]. When G = G and ϕ is the identity, or when ′ → ∗ ∗ G G ′ G G = 1, we will denote L(f, ϕ) by Lf and R(f, ϕ)∗ by Rf∗ . When G = 1, then Rf∗ (E, λ) is the G-invariant sub-object of Rf∗E with respect to the G-action on Rf∗E induced by λ. Let G act on two smooth projective varieties X and Y . Denote by G∆ the diagonal subgroup b of G G. Let (P, ρ) be an object of D (X Y ). Let (πX ,π1) : (X Y, G∆) (X, G) and × G∆ × × → (π ,π ) : (X Y, G ) (Y, G) be the projections from X Y to X and Y equivariant with Y 2 × ∆ → × respect to the projections from the subgroup G∆ of G G to the two factors. We get the Fourier-Mukai transformation Φ : Db (X) Db (Y ),× given by (P,ρ) G → G L (4.1) Φ ( )= R(π ,π )G L(π ,π )∗( ) (P, ρ) . (P,ρ) • Y 2 ∗ X 1 • ⊗ Tensorization of a linearization λ by a character χ of G yields the linearization (χ λ)g = χ(g)λg. b b ⊗ We get an auto-equivalence Φχ of each of DG(X) and DG(Y ) sending an object (E, λ) to (E,χ λ) and sending a morphism f : (E , λ ) (E , λ ) to itself under the equality of ⊗ 1 1 → 2 2 Hom((E1, λ1), (E2, λ2)) and Hom((E1,χ λ1), (E2,χ λ2)) as subspaces of Hom(E1, E2). Note that Φ commutes with the Fourier-Mukai⊗ transformation⊗ Φ above with kernel (P, ρ) χ (P,ρ) ∈ Db (X Y ), G∆ × (4.2) Φ Φ = Φ Φ . χ ◦ (P,ρ) ∼ (P,ρ) ◦ χ Let S1 and S2 be smooth projective varieties and assume that the Fourier-Mukai transfor- b b b mation ΦP : D (S1) D (S2) with kernel an object P D (S1 S2) is an equivalence. Let n n → ∈ × X = S1 , Y = S2 , and let G = Sn act on both by permuting the factors. We get the object ⊠ P n := P ⊠ ⊠P in Db (Sn Sn), endowed with the linearization ρ⊠ permuting the factors, · · · Sn,∆ 1 × 2 and b n b n (4.3) Φ ⊠n : D (S ) D (S ) (P ,ρ⊠) Sn 1 → Sn 2 is an equivalence as well. ′ The deﬁnition of the functor Φ(P,ρ) in (4.1) admits an obvious generalization when ϕ : G G ′ → is a surjective homomorphism, G acts on X, G acts on Y , and the subgroup G∆ is replaced 26 EYAL MARKMAN

′ by the subgroup Gϕ of G G , which is the graph of ϕ. We will use this generalization in the next paragraph with G′ =× 1. Let a finite group G act on a smooth projective variety X. Let G-Hilb(X) be moduli space 0 of G-clusters in X, i.e., of G-invariant 0-dimensional subschemes Z, such that H (Z, Z ) is the regular representation of G. When S is a surface, X is the n-th cartesian powerOSn of [n] S, and G = Sn acts by permuting the factors, then the Hilbert scheme S is isomorphic to n the connected component of Sn-Hilb(S ) which contains the free orbits, by [Hai]. We get a n [n] universal Sn 1-invariant subscheme Γ S S , so that Γ, with the natural linearization × b n [n] ⊂ × O ρ, is an object of DSn×1(S S ). When S is a smooth projective surface, the Fourier-Mukai transformation × (4.4) BKR := Φ : Db (Sn) Db(S[n]) (OΓ,ρ) Sn → is an equivalence, by [BKR, Cor. 1.3]. We are using here the convention7 of [Kr] for the derived McKay correspondence. Denote by b : Γ Sn the restriction of the first projection and by q :Γ S[n] that of the second projection. → → b q (4.5) Sn Γ S[n]. ←− −→ The morphism q is Sn-invariant and flat of degree n!. Note that q factors through the quotient of Γ by the index 2 alternating subgroup A of S , andq ¯ : Γ/A S[n] is a double cover of n n n → S[n] branched over the divisor D of non-reduced subschemes. Hence,

An q¯ = (q ) = [n] , ∗OΓ/An ∼ ∗OΓ ∼ OS ⊕L 2 where = [n] ( D). Let χ be the sign character of S . Denote by χ also the linearization L ∼ OS − n of n acting via the character χ. We get the isomorphisms OS Sn (4.6) BKR( n , 1) = Rq ( ) = [n] , OS ∼ ∗ OΓ ∼ OS Sn BKR( n ,χ) = Rq ( ,χ) = . OS ∼ ∗ OΓ ∼ L Given two smooth projective surfaces S and S and an object P Db(S S ), denote by 1 2 ∈ 1 × 2 (4.7) Φ[n] : Db(S[n]) Db(S[n]) P 1 → 2 [n] −1 the BKR-conjugate Φ := BKR Φ ⊠n BKR of (4.3). Denote by P ◦ (P ,ρ⊠) ◦ (4.8) Φ[n] := BKR Φ BKR−1 : Db(S[n]) Db(S[n]), χ ◦ χ ◦ i → i i = 1, 2, the auto-equivalence obtained by conjugating the functor Φχ of tensorization by the sign character of Sn. Equation (4.2) yields [n] [n] (4.9) Φ[n] Φ = Φ Φ[n]. χ ◦ P ∼ P ◦ χ Equations (4.6) yield

[n] (4.10) Φ ( [n] ) = . χ OS ∼ L 7 b [n] b n The Fourier-Mukai transformation from D (S ) to DSn (S ) with kernel the linearized object (OΓ,ρ) is an equivalence as well, which is often referred to as the derived McKay correspondence. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 27

Remark 4.1. (1) Let G be a ﬁnite group acting on a variety X, let Y be a subscheme of X, ∗ .[( let ι : Y ֒ X be the inclusion, and let F be a sheaf on Y . Set E := g∈G[g (ι∗F → ∗ ⊕ Endow E with the linearization λ, such that λf : E f E maps the direct summand ∗ →∗ g (ι∗F ) to itself via the identity map. Let χ : G C be a character. Let η : E E → ∗ −1 → be the automorphism acting on the direct summand g (ι∗F ) by χ(g ). Then η lifts to an isomorphism η : (E, λ) (E,χ λ). (2) Assume, furthermore, that→ the subschemes⊗ Y and g(Y ) are disjoint, for every g G. ∈ Set Z := g∈G g(Y ) and let e : Z ֒ X be the inclusion. Let (A, ρ) be an object of b ∪ ∗ → ∗ DG(X). Set F := ι A. The linearization ρ induces an isomorphism between e∗e A and ∗ −1 −1 the object E = g∈G[g (ι∗F )] above. Indeed, e restricts to g (Y ) as g ι g and so ⊕ ∗ −1 ◦ ◦ the direct summand of e∗e A supported on g (Y ) is

ρ −1 (g−1 ι g) (g−1 ι g)∗A = g∗ ι (ι∗(g−1)∗A) g g∗(ι ι∗(A)), ◦ ◦ ∗ ◦ ◦ ∗ → ∗ and the right hand side is the direct summand of E supported on g−1(Y ). We claim ∗ ∗ that e∗e (A, ρ) is isomorphic to the object (E, λ) above. In particular, e∗e (A, ρ) is ∗ isomorphic to e∗e (A, χ ρ). It suﬃces to prove, more generally, that any two linearizations (E, ρ) and (E, λ) of⊗ E are isomorphic. We need to construct an automorphism φ of E satisfying

λg (4.11) E / g∗E

φ g∗(φ) E / g∗E, ρg

for all g G. Let Eg(Y ) := g∗ι∗F be the direct summand of E supported on g(Y ). Let ∈ ∗ ρg(f(Y )) be the component of ρg : E g E supported on f(Y ). We identify the factor of Aut(g∗E) supported on Y with Aut(→E ) and deﬁne φ(g(Y )) Aut(E ) by g(Y ) ∈ g(Y ) −1 φ(g(Y )) = ρg(Y )(λg(Y )) .

Note that φ(Y ) = id, since ρ1 and λ1 are both the identity. The diagram above commutes over the component Y of Z, by deﬁnition of φ. Consider the diagram

λgf

∗ λf f (λg ) # E / f ∗E / f ∗g∗E

φ f ∗(φ) (gf)∗(φ) / ∗ / ∗ ∗ E ρ f E ∗ f g E. f f (ρg ) ;

ρgf The upper and lower domes commute, by deﬁnition of a linearization. The left and outer squares commute over the component Y , by deﬁnition of φ. Hence, the right square commute as well over Y . Hence, the square (4.11) commutes also over f(Y ), for all f G. ∈ 28 EYAL MARKMAN

5. The derived monodromy group Taelman introduced a natural action of the group Aut(Db(X)) of auto-equivalences of Db(X) on the rational LLV lattice H˜ (X, Q) [Ta, Theorem C]. We review Taelman’s results, as they play a central role in Section 6. Let IHSM be the following groupoid. Objects of IHSM are pairs (X,ǫ), where X is a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold satisfying the condition that if dimC(X) is divisible by 4 then the dimension of H2(X, Q) is odd. All known examples satisfy this latter condition. If the complex dimension of X is divisible by 4, then X is enriched with the data ǫ of an orientation of the vector space H2(X, Q) (which determines an orientation of H(X, Q)). If the complex dimension of X is not divisible by 4, then the data ǫ is empty. The morphisms in ′ ∗ ∗ HomIHSM ((X,ǫ), (Y,ǫ )) are vector spaces isomorphisms in Hom(H (X, Q),H (Y,eQ)), which are compositions of parallel transport operators and isomorphisms induced by derived equivalences (independent of the data ǫ). Explicitly, a morphism f Hom (X,Y ) is the compo- ∈ IHSM sition fn f2 f1, where Xi is an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold deformation equivalent◦···◦ to X, X◦ = X, X = Y , and f : H∗(X , Q) H∗(X , Q) is either a parallel trans- 0 n i i−1 → i port operator8 or the isomorphism induced by the correspondence π∗ td ch( )π∗ td , i−1 Xi−1 P i Xi where X and X are projective, Db(X X ) is the kernel of the Fourier-Mukai functor i−1 i i−1 i p p Φ : Db(X ) Db(X ), and Φ Pis ∈ an exact equivalence× of triangulated categories. P i−1 → i P Definition 5.1. The derived monodromy group DMon(X) is the subgroup HomIHSM ((X,ǫ), (X,ǫ)) of GL(H∗(X, Q)) (which is independent of ǫ). A derived parallel transport operator is a linear transformation φ : H∗(X, Q) H∗(Y, Q), which belongs to Hom ((X,ǫ), (Y,ǫ′)). → IHSM Let Lat be the category of rational vector spaces with a non-degenerate inner product. Morphisms in Lat are isometries. Taelman defines the functor (5.1) H˜ : IHSM Lat → sending an object X to its rational LLV lattice H˜ (X, Q) given in (2.1). The functor H˜ sends a morphism in f Hom ((X,ǫ), (Y,ǫ′)) to an isometry H˜ (f) : H˜ (X, Q) H˜ (Y, Q). If f is ∈ IHSM → induced by a parallel transport operator and dimC(X) = 2n for odd n, then H˜ (f) is induced by the restriction of f to the second cohomology extended via the identity to the direct summand UQ. If f is induced by a parallel transport operator, the dimension of X is divisible by 4, and H2(X, Q) is odd dimensional, then H˜ (f) is defined by the above description only up to sign, and the sign is chosen so that H˜ (f) is orientation preserving. If f is induced by a derived equivalence ΦP as above, then H˜ (f) is the isometry defined in [Ta, Theorems 4.7 and 4.9], which we will recall in Theorem 5.3 below. We get the homomorphism (5.2) H˜ : DMon(X) O(H˜ (X, Q)). → 2 If λ H (X, Q) is c1(L), for some line bundle L Pic(X), then tensorization by L corresponds to the∈ element of DMon(X) acting on H∗(X, Q)∈ by multiplication by ch(L) = exp(λ) and the ˜ 2 ˜ latter is mapped via H to exp(eλ) := id + eλ + eλ/2 in SO(H(X, Q)), where eλ is given in Equation (2.2), by [Ta, Theorem 3.1 and Prop. 3.2].

8 ∗ ∗ A parallel transport operator f : H (X, Q) → H (Y, Q) is the parallel-transport in the local system Rπ∗Q associated to a path from a point b0 to a point b1 in the analytic base B of a smooth and proper family π : X → B of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds, not necessarily projective, with ﬁber X over b0 and Y over b1. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 29

Let K3[n] be the full subgroupid of IHSM, whose objects are projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds deformation equivalent to the Hilbert scheme S[n] of length n subschemes of a K3 surface S. We get the functor (5.3) [n] : K3[1] K3[n] → sending a K3 surface S to its Hilbert scheme S[n], sending a parallel transport operator associated to the path in the base of a family of K3 surfaces to the parallel transport operator associated to the same path for the relative family of Hilbert schemes over the same base, and sending the morphism associated to an equivalence Φ : Db(S ) Dn(S ) to the morphism asso- 1 → 2 ciated to Φ[n] : Db(S[n]) Db(S[n]) obtained by conjugating Φ⊠ ⊠Φ : Db (Sn) Db (Sn) 1 → 2 · · · Sn 1 → Sn 2 with the BKR equivalence Db(S[n]) Db (Sn), i = 1, 2, given in (4.4). i → Sn i Let SH∗(X, Q) be the subalgebra of H∗(X, Q) generated by H2(X, Q). Then SH∗(X, Q) is an irreducible g-sub-module of H∗(X, Q), which is isomorphic to the irreducible submodule of the symmetric power Symn(H˜ (X, Q)) containing αn, by [Ta, Prop. 3.5 and 3.7]. The embedding is given by (5.4) Ψ : SH∗(X, Q) Symn(H˜ (X, Q)), → λ λ e e (αn/n!), 1 · · · n 7→ λ1 · · · λn 2 where λi H (X, Q), 1 i n, and eλ(x1 xn) := i x1 eλ(xi) xn. Note that Ψ(1) = αn∈/n! and ≤ ≤ · · · · · · · · · P n (5.5) Ψ([pt]) = β /cX , where cX is the Fujiki constant, by [Ta, Lemma 3.6]. The image of Ψ is equal to the kernel of the g-module homomorphism (5.6) ∆ : Symn(H˜ (X, Q)) Symn−2(H˜ (X, Q)), → ∆(x x ) = (x ,x )x xˆ xˆ x , by [Ta, Lemma 3.7]. Hence, the image of Ψ 1 · · · n i

∗ ∗ φ in HomIHSM ((X,ǫ1), (Y,ǫ2)). It follows that φ maps SH (X, Q) to SH (Y, Q), as each is an irreducible subrepresentation of the LLV algebra, which appears with multiplicity 1. Denote by SH(φ) : SH∗(X, Q) SH∗(Y, Q) → the restriction of φ to SH∗(X, Q). Theorem 5.3. ([Ta, Theorems 4.7 and 4.9]) Assume that X and Y are of dimension 2n and φ is a morphism in Hom ((X,ǫ ), (Y,ǫ )). There exists a unique isometry H(φ) : H(X, Q) IHSM 1 2 → H(Y, Q) making the following diagram commutative e e ǫ(H(φ))SH(φ) e ∗ ∗ SH (X, Q) e / SH (Y, Q)

Ψ Ψ SymnH(X, Q) / SymnH(Y, Q), Symn(H(φ)) e 1 if n ise odd, e where ǫ(H(φ)) = 1 if n is even and H(φ) is orientation preserving,   1 if n is even and H(φ) is orientation reversing. e − e Remark 5.4. Assume n is even. In that case Symn(H(φ)) = Symn( H(φ)). Let IHSM be e − n the full subcategory of IHSM, whose objects (X,ǫX ) consist of X of dimension 2n. There is a functor χ from the groupoid IHSM to the group µ e:= 1 , which ise defined as follows. The n 2 {± } image of Ψ : SH∗(X, Q) SymnH(X, Q) is an irreducible g := so(H(X, Q))-representation X → X spanned by the subvariety IsotX of n-th powers of non-zero isotropic classes in H(X, Q). The n analogous subvariety IsotX,R of Syme H(X, R) is connected (in the classicale topology) being the image of the complement of the origin in the quadric cone in H(X, R). Indeed, thee signature of H(X, R) is (4, b (X) 2) and so the complemente of the origin in the quadric cone in H(X, R) 2 − is homotopic to the product of a 3-sphere and a b (X) 3e sphere. The image Isot R of 2 − − X, Isote X,R under multiplication by 1 is disjoint from IsotX,R, since n is even. If φ belongse to − −1 Hom ((X,ǫ ), (Y,ǫ )), then Ψ SH(φ) Ψ maps Isot R isomorphically to one of IHSM X Y Y ◦ ◦ X X, IsotY,R or IsotY,R, and we set χ(φ) = 1, if the image is IsotY,R and 1 if it is IsotY,R. Note that the− functor χ is independent of the data of orientations. If φ arrises− from− a parallel transport operator, then χ(φ)=1. If φ corresponds to an equivalence of derived categories Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ) mapping the sky-scraper sheaf of some point to an object F of positive → −1 n rank, then χ(φ) = 1, since then (ΨY SH(φ) ΨX )(β /cX ) =Ψ(v(F )) and both cX and the coefficient rank(F )/n! of αn in Ψ(v(F◦)) are positive.◦ Taelman first proves that there exists an isometry H(φ), unique up to sign, such that the diagram

χ(φ)SH(φ) e SH∗(X, Q) / SH∗(Y, Q)

ΨX ΨY SymnH(X, Q) / SymnH(Y, Q) Symn(H(φ)) e e e VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 31 commutes. The orientations of the objects in IHSMn are introduced in order to determine the sign of H(φ) so that χ(φ)= ǫ(H(φ)). Remark 5.5. We sketch the more functorial description of Ψ as a natural transformation. We e e have the functor SH : IHSM Lat sending an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X to the subring SH∗(X, Q) of→H∗(X, Q), forgetting the ring structure but endowing it with the restriction of the Mukai pairing of H∗(X, Q) [Ta, Sec. 3.2]. We have the endofunctor Isotn : Lat Lat sending a rational vector space V with a bilinear pairing to the subspace →n V (n) of Sym (V ) spanned by n-th powers of isotropic vectors. We have the full functor Fn : IHSMn IHSM from the category IHSMn of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds of dimension→ 2n into that without dimension restriction. Then the above construction produces the natural transformation Ψ : SH F Isot H˜ F . ◦ n → n ◦ ◦ n

6. The LLV line of an object of Db(X) which deforms in co-dimension 1 in HH2(X) Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. In Section 6.1 we review results of Taelman and Verbitsky stating that two Lie subalgebras of End(H∗(X, C)) coincide, one is the LLV Lie algebra gX,C of X, defined in terms of the cohomology ring of X, and the other is an analogous Lie algebra defined in terms of the Hochschield cohomology of X. The 2 vector space HT (X) naturally embeds in gX,C. In Section 6.2 we show that if a hyperplane Σ in HT 2(X) annihilates a non-zero rational class n 1 in the subspace of Sym H(X, Q), n = 2 dimC(X), spanned by powers of isotropic classes, then Σ and its complex conjugate generate the Lie subalgebra of gX,C annihilating some non-zero rational class in H(X, Q)e (Lemma 6.9). Let F be an object in Db(X). In Section 6.3 we show that the kernel in HT 2(X) of the HT 2 obstruction map obse F , given in (3.1), is mapped via the Duflo automorphism of HT (X) into HT the stabilizer of the Mukai vector v(F ) of F . We use a result of Huang relating obsF and obsF , given in (1.1) [Hua]. In section 6.4 we associate to every object F in Db(X) with a rank 1 obstruction map HT 2(X) Hom(F, F [2]) a line ℓ(F ) in H˜ (X, Q) (Theorem 6.13). The construction is equivariant with respect→ to the Aut(Db(X))-action. We calculate the line ℓ(F ) when F is a sky-scraper [n] sheaf (Example 6.16) and when F is the structure sheaf X of X of K3 and generalized Kummer deformation types (Lemma 6.18). O In Section 6.5 we show that if a torsion sheaf F has a rank 1 obstruction map and is supported on a proper irreducible subvariety Z of X, then Z is either a lagrangian subvariety or a point (Theorem 6.24). We calculate the line ℓ(F ) for the structure sheaf of a lagrangian subvariety (Lemma 6.25).

6.1. The Hochschild Lie algebra of a holomorphic symplectic manifold. Let X be a 2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Let h be the endomorphism of H∗(X, C) acting on Hk(X, C) by multiplication by k 2n. Let h′ be the endomorphism of H∗(X, C) acting on Hp,q(X, C) by multiplication by q− p. Choose a holomorphic symplec- 0 2 n − tic form σ in H (X, ΩX ). The volume form σ induces the isomorphism of vector bundles γ : iT X Ω2n−i. Denote by γ : HT ∗(X) H∗(X, C) the induced isomorphism. Set ∧ → X → 32 EYAL MARKMAN

p,q ∗ HΩ∗(X) := p,qH (X). We identify HΩ∗(X) with H (X, C) via the Hodge decomposition, ⊕ ′ but the grading of HΩ∗(X) is determined by h , i.e., p,q HΩd(X)= H (X). q−Mp=d Let (6.1) m : HT ∗(X) End(HΩ (X)) → ∗ be the associative algebras homomorphism corresponding to the HT ∗(X)-module structure. The isomorphism γ relates the ring structure of HT ∗(X) with the HT ∗(X)-module structure of HΩ (X) as follows. Given a HT 2i(X) and b HT ∗(X) we have ∗ ∈ ∈ (6.2) m (γ(b)) = γ(a b). a ∧ For a HT k(X), the endomorphism m has degree k with respect to the grading h′, i.e. ∈ a ma : HΩi(X) HΩi+k(X). → 2 ′ We say that me, e HT (X), has the hard Lefschetz property with respect to h , if there exists an element f End(∈ HΩ (X)), such that the triple (m , h′,f) is an sl triple, i,e., ∈ ∗ e 2 [h′,m ] = 2m , [h′,f]= 2f, [m ,f]= h′. e e − e i i The symplectic form induces the isomorphism σ : T X ΩX . On the level of cohomology it induces a graded ring isomorphism σ : HT ∗(X) ∧H∗(X,→C). A Zariski dense open subset of H2(X, C) consists of elements e which have the Hard→ Lefschetz property with respect to h, by the Hard Lefschetz Theorem. It follows that a Zariski dense open subset of HT 2(X) consists of elements e, such that the endomorphism of HT ∗(X) of multiplication by e has the Hard Lefschetz property with respect to the grading of HT ∗(X). Consequently, a Zariski dense open 2 subset of HT (X) consists of elements e, such that the endomorphism me of HΩ∗(X) has the Hard Lefschetz property with respect to the grading h′, since γ is an isomorphism of graded ∗ ′ HT (X)-modules, by Equation (6.2). Let g be the subalgebra of End(HΩ∗(X)) generated by ′ 2 all sl2 triples (me, h ,f), where e is in HT (X). Composing the isomorphism γ with the inverse of σ we get the isomorphism η = γ σ−1 : j 2n−j ◦ Ω Ω inducing the isomorphism X → X ηi,j : Hi(Ωj ) Hi(Ω2n−j). X → X Set η := ηi,j : H∗(X, C) H∗(X, C). The following equality is evident ⊕0≤i,j≤2n → η h η−1 = h′. ◦ ◦ Equation (6.2) translates to (6.3) m (γ(b)) = η(σ(a) σ(b)), a ∪ for a HT 2i(X), where on the right the cup product is that of the cohomology ring structure. Denote∈ by e the endomorphism of H∗(X, C) of multiplication by σ(a), for a HT 2(X). σ(a) ∈ Equation (6.3) yields (6.4) η e η−1 = m ◦ σ(a) ◦ a ′ −1 ′ and (e ,h,f) is a sl triple, if and only if (m , h , η f η ) is. Thus, η conjugates gC to g . σ(a) 2 a ◦ ◦ −1 ′ (6.5) ηgCη = g . VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 33

The group Spin(H˜ (X, C)) acts on H∗(X, C) integrating the infinitesimal action of the LLV Lie algebra gC := so(H˜ (X, C)). Denote the resulting representation by (6.6) ρ : Spin(H˜ (X, C)) GL(H∗(X, C)). → It is known that ρ is injective, if the odd cohomology of X is non trivial. Furthermore, the restriction of ρ to the even cohomology factors through an injective homomorphism (6.7)ρ ¯ : SO(H˜ (X, C)) GL(Hev(X, C)). → The following is a fundamental result of Verbitsky. Theorem 6.1. [Ve1, Theorem 9.1 and 9.7(i)] The operator η is an involution and it belongs to the image of ρ. Consequently, we get the equality ′ (6.8) gC = g , since the left hand side of (6.5) is equal to gC. An alternative proof of Equality (6.8) is provided in [Ta, Prop. 2.9]. 2 2 Corollary 6.2. The image m(HT (X))) of HT (X) in End(HΩ∗(X)), via the homomorphism m given in (6.1), is contained in gC, yielding 2 (6.9) m : HT (X) gC. → ′ The operator h belongs to gC. ′ ′ Proof. The operator h belongs to g , by definition, hence also to gC. Similarly, ma belongs to ′ 2 g , for a Zariski dense open subset of HT (X), by definition, hence also to gC. The g-equivariance of Ψ, given in (5.4), and the fact that Ψ maps the class 1 SH0(X, C) to n n 4n n ∈ α /n! Sym (H˜ (X, C)) and the class [pt] SH (X, C) to β /cX , induces a Hodge structure on the∈ image of Ψ such that αn is of type (0,∈0), βn is of type (2n, 2n), Ψ is a morphism of Hodge structures, and the Hodge direct summand of weight (p,q) in Im(Ψ) is the common eigenspace of h and h′ of weights p + q 2n and q p respectively. The Lie algebra g is a sub Hodge structure of End(H∗(X, Q)) and,− given a− class λ Hp,q(X, C) with p + q = 2, the operator e : SH∗(X, C) SH∗(X, C) has Hodge type (p,q∈). Hence, the same holds for the operator λ → eλ acting on Im(Ψ) with respect to the induced Hodge structure. Any g-module gets endowed with a Hodge structure and in particular so does the rational Hodge lattice H˜ (X, Q) and the latter induces one on Symn(H˜ (X, C)) of which the image of Ψ is a sub Hodge structure with ˜ p,q respect to the same Hodge structure induced above. We will denote by Hfine(X) the Hodge direct summand of weight (p,q), in order to distinguish it from the Hodge decomposition of the pure Hodge structure of weight 0 on H˜ (X, Q) introduced in Section 2.1. The class α has weight (0, 0) and the class β has weight (2, 2) and the direct summand H2(X, Q) in H˜ (X, Q) is a sub Hodge structure with its original weight 2 Hodge structure. Theorem 6.1 determines an action of η on H˜ (X, C), by the inverse ofρ ¯, given in (6.7), of the restriction of η to the even cohomology of X. Conjugation by the operator η interchanges h and ′ ˜ p,q ˜ 2−p,q ˜ 2,0 h . Hence, η(Hfine(X)) = Hfine (X). Denote by σ the class in Hfine(X, C) corresponding to the chosen symplectic form under the identification H˜ 2,0 (X, C)= H2,0(X). Given λ Hi( jT X), fine ∈ ∧ 34 EYAL MARKMAN i + j = 2, the operator mλ, given in (6.9), has Hodge type ( j, i). Hence, mλ(σ) has Hodge type (i, i). We get the homomorphism − (6.10) µ : HT 2(X) H˜ (X, C) → λ m (σ). 7→ λ We have (η e η−1)(σ)= m (σ), by (6.4). Now η−1(σ)= cα, for a non-zero scalar c, and ◦ σ(λ) ◦ λ the homomorphism λ eσ(λ)(α) is injective. Hence, the homomorphism µ is injective as well. We have the commutative7→ diagram

ι % 2 e evα H (X, C) / gC / H˜ (X, C) O O O 1 σ Adη c η

2 HT (X) / gC / H˜ (X, C), m evσ 9

µ where ι is the natural inclusion and evα and evσ are the evaluations of an endomorphism of H˜ (X, C) on the elements α and σ. The top dome commutes by Equation (2.2) and the bottom by definition of µ. The left square commutes by Equation (6.4) and the right by the equality η−1(σ)= cα and the fact that η = η−1 (Theorem 6.1). Note the equalities (6.11) µ(H0( 2T X)) = Cα, µ(H1(T X)) = H1,1(X), and µ(H2( )) = Cβ. ∧ OX ˜ 1,−1 ˜ 2,0 The Hodge structure of Section 2.1 is related to the above by setting H (X)= Hfine(X), ˜ −1,1 ˜ 0,2 H (X)= Hfine(X), and H˜ 0,0(X)= H˜ 0,0 (X) H˜ 1,1 (X) H˜ 2,2 (X). fine ⊕ fine ⊕ fine In particular, the homomorphism µ, given in (6.10), is an isomorphism between HT 2(X) and H˜ 0,0(X). The homomorphism µ thus pulls back the Mukai pairing to a non-degenerate pairing on HT 2(X) satisfying

(6.12) (λ1, λ2) := (mλ1 (σ),mλ2 (σ)), 2 for all λ1, λ2 HT (X). The homomorphism µ depends only on the choice of σ, and is thus canonical up to∈ a scalar multiple. Hence, so is the pairing (6.12). In particular, a hyperplane Σ in HT 2(X) determines the orthogonal line Σ⊥ in HT 2(X), and hence the line ℓ(Σ) in H˜ 0,0(X), which is the image of Σ⊥ via (6.10). (6.13) ℓ(Σ) := µ(Σ⊥) := m (σ) : λ Σ⊥ . { λ ∈ } Assume σ is normalized so that (σ, σ¯) = 1. Lemma 6.3. The following equality holds for all λ , λ HT 2(X). 1 2 ∈ (6.14) m (m (σ)) = (µ(λ ),µ(λ ))¯σ. λ1 λ2 − 1 2 VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 35

Proof. We have (m (m (σ)),σ)= (m (σ),m (σ)) = (µ(λ ),µ(λ )), λ1 λ2 − λ2 λ1 − 1 2 where the first equality is due to the fact that mλ1 belongs to gC, by Corollary 6.2, and the ′ second equality follows by the definition of µ. Now mλ has degree 2 with respect to h , for all 2 ˜ 0,2 λ HT (X), and so mλ1 (mλ2 (σ)) belongs to Hfine(X) and is thus of the form tσ¯, for a scalar t.∈ We get that t = (σ, tσ¯) = (σ, m (m (σ))) = (µ(λ ),µ(λ )). λ1 λ2 − 1 2 6.2. Subalgebras of the Hochschild Lie algebra generated by a hyperplane in HT 2(X).

Lemma 6.4. Let Σ be a hyperplane in HT 2(X). Let ℓ be a line in H˜ 0,0(X)= Cα H1,1(X) 0 ⊕ ⊕ Cβ. The image m(Σ) of Σ in gC via (6.9) is contained in the subalgebra gC,ℓ0 of gC annihilating ℓ0, if and only if ℓ0 = ℓ(Σ). Proof. Let λ be a non-zero class in Σ⊥. Then m (σ) spans ℓ(Σ). Given a class λ HT 2(X) 0 λ0 ∈ we have mλ(mλ0 (σ)) = (λ0, λ)¯σ, by Equation (6.14) and the definition of the pairing on 2 − HH (T ). We conclude that mλ annihilates ℓ(Σ), if and only if λ belongs to Σ. Lemma 6.5. Let g O(H˜ (X, C)) be an isometry which leaves invariant every element of span σ, σ¯ . Then ∈ { } −1 (6.15) gmλg = mµ−1(g(µ(λ))), where µ−1 : H˜ 0,0(X) HT 2(X) is the inverse of µ. → −1 Proof. We have (gmλg )(σ) = g(mλ(σ)) = g(µ(λ)) = mµ−1(g(µ(λ)))(σ). Every element of H˜ 0,0(X) is of the form µ(λ′), for some λ′ HT 2(X), and ∈ ′ ′ −1 ′ m −1 (µ(λ )) = (g(µ(λ)),µ(λ ))¯σ = (µ(λ), g (µ(λ )))¯σ, µ (g(µ(λ))) − − (gm g−1)(µ(λ′)) = g[(µ(λ), g−1(µ(λ′)))¯σ]= (µ(λ), g−1(µ(λ′)))¯σ. λ − − Finally, both sides of (6.15) annihilateσ ¯. Lemma 6.6. Let U HT 2(X) be a 2-dimensional subspace such that the subspace µ(U ) of 0 ⊂ 0 H˜ (X, C) is defined over R and the restriction of the pairing to µ(U0) is non-degenerate. Let ⊥ 2 U0 be the subspace of HT (X) which is the orthogonal complement of U0 with respect to the ˜ ⊥ pairing (6.12). Then the subalgebra of gC := so(H(X, C)) generated by m(U0 ) and its complex conjugate m(U ⊥) is equal to the subalgebra so[H˜ 1,−1(X) µ(U ⊥) H˜ −1,1(X)] annihilating 0 ⊕ 0 ⊕ µ(U0). 1 Proof. The proof is identical to Step 2 in the proof of Lemma 2.3 replacing ι : H (T X) gC ⊥ → by m : U gC. 0 → Lemma 6.7. Let ℓ HT 2(X) be a 1-dimensional subspace such that the line µ(ℓ) in H˜ (X, C) is defined over R. Let⊂ Σ be the subspace of HT 2(X) which is the orthogonal complement of ℓ with respect to the pairing (6.12). Then the subalgebra of gC generated by m(Σ) and its complex conjugate m(Σ) is equal to the subalgebra gC,ℓ annihilating µ(ℓ). 36 EYAL MARKMAN

Proof. The subspace m(Σ) of gC is contained in gC,ℓ, by Lemma 6.4, and its complex conjugate m(Σ) is contained in gC,ℓ, since µ(ℓ) is deﬁned over R. Hence, the subalgebra a of gC generated by m(Σ) and m(Σ) is contained in gC,ℓ. Furthermore, a contains the subalgebra gC,U0 annihi- 0,0 lating U0, for every two dimensional subspace U0 of H˜ (X), which is deﬁned over R, contains µ(ℓ), and such that the induced pairing on U0 is non-degenerate, by Lemma 6.6.

Choose such a U0. We get the flag gC,U0 a gC,ℓ, where the first inclusion is strict. The ⊂ ⊆ ⊥ ⊥ quotient gC/gC,U0 is isomorphic to the direct sum of so(U0) and U0 U0 . If a contains U0 U0 9 ⊗ ⊥ ⊗ then it is the whole of gC, since so(U ) is contained in the Lie bracket of U U with itself. 0 0 ⊗ 0 Hence, a intersects U U ⊥ either trivially, or along ℓ U ⊥, for some line ℓ U . If the 0 ⊗ 0 0 ⊗ 0 0 ⊂ 0 intersection is trivial, then a = so(U0) gC,U0 , which is impossible, since so(U0) is not contained ×⊥ in gC . Hence, the intersection is ℓ U , for some line ℓ U . Finally, ℓ must be orthogonal ,ℓ 0 ⊗ 0 0 ⊂ 0 0 to µ(ℓ), since a is contained in gC,ℓ. Lemma 6.8. Let K be a subfield of C, let ℓ be a line in H(X, C), and let j a positive integer. If the line ℓj in SymjH(X, C) is defined over K, then so does ℓ. e Proof. The Veronese embedding ϕ : P(H(X, C)) P(SymjH(X, C)), ℓ ℓj, is defined over Q e and is thus equivariant with respect to every automorphism→ g of C. Assume7→ that ℓj is defined over K. The injectivity of ϕ implies thate ℓ is invariant withe respect to every automorphism of C leaving K invariant. Hence, ℓ is defined over K. Lemma 6.9. Let f be a non-zero element of the kernel of ∆ : Symn(H˜ (X, Q)) Symn−2(H˜ (X, Q)) of Hodge type (0, 0). Let Σ be a subspace of HT 2(X) of co-dimension 1. Assume→ that m(Σ) is contained in the subalgebra gC annihilating f. Then the line ℓ(Σ) H˜ (X, C), given in (6.13), ,f ⊂ is defined over Q, is contained in H˜ 0,0(X), and f spans the image of the projection of ℓ(Σ)n to ker(∆). Furthermore, gC,f = gC,ℓ(Σ).

⌊n/2⌋ i n−2i 0,0 Proof. The element f has the form (σσ¯) fi, where fi belongs to Sym (H˜ (X)), since i=0 f has Hodge type (0, 0). X Step 1: We derive a system (6.16) and (6.17) of partial diﬀerential equations that the fi satisfy. Let x ,...,x be an orthonormal basis of H˜ 0,0(X). We have { 1 N } i 2 i−1 i ∆ (σσ¯) fi = i (σσ¯) fi + (σσ¯) ∆(fi). Hence, 2 (6.16) ∆(fi−1)+ i fi = 0, 2 for 1 i n/2 , since f belongs to the kernel of ∆. Given λ HT (X), we have mλ(xi) = (µ(λ≤),x≤)¯σ ⌊, by⌋ Equation (6.14). Thus, ∈ − i n−2i m (σσ¯)ix x = iµ(λ)σi−1σ¯ix x σiσ¯i+1 (µ(λ),x )x xˆ x . λ i1 · · · in−2i i1 · · · in−2i − ij i1 · · · ij · · · in−2i j=1 X 9 ˜ ∗ Choose and orthogonal basis {ei} of H(X, C) with e1,e2 ∈ U0. Let {ei } be the dual basis. Set A = ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ (e1,e1)e1 ⊗ e3 − (e3,e3)e3 ⊗ e1, B = (e2,e2)e2 ⊗ e3 − (e3,e3)e3 ⊗ e2, and C = (e1,e1)e1 ⊗ e2 − (e2,e2)e2 ⊗ e1. ⊥ Then A and B belong to the submodule of gC isomorphic to U0 ⊗ U0 , C spans so(U0), and [A, B]=(e3,e3)C. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 37

Let µ(λ)∗ be the element of H˜ 0,0(X)∗ satisfying µ(λ)∗(λ′) = (µ(λ), λ′), for all λ′ H˜ 0,0(X). Then ∈ m ((σσ¯)if )= iµ(λ)σi−1σ¯if σiσ¯i+1[f yµ(λ)∗]. λ i i − i

⌊n/2⌋+1 m (f)= (iµ(λ)f [f yµ(λ)∗]) σi−1σ¯i = 0, λ i − i−1 Xi=1 for all λ Σ, where we set f = 0. Hence, for all λ Σ and 0 < i n/2 + 1 we have ∈ ⌊n/2⌋+1 ∈ ≤ ⌊ ⌋ (6.17) iµ(λ)f [f yµ(λ)∗] = 0. i − i−1 So ix f = ∂fi−1 , if x belongs to µ(Σ). j i ∂xj j Step 2: We prove that ℓ(Σ) is defined over R. If n is odd, then f⌊n/2⌋ is linear and Equation (6.17) for i =1+ n/2 implies that f is orthogonal to µ(Σ) and so belongs to ℓ(Σ). Note ⌊ ⌋ ⌊n/2⌋ that fi is real, for all i, since f is rational. If f⌊n/2⌋ does not vanish, then ℓ(Σ) is defined over R. If f⌊n/2⌋ does vanish, let j be the maximal index, such that fj = 0, but fj+1 = 0. Equation n−2j 6 (6.17) for i = j + 1 implies that fj belongs to ℓ(Σ) , which is thus defined over R, and again we get that ℓ(Σ) is defined over R, by Lemma 6.8. If n is even, then fn/2 is constant. If it vanishes, then the above argument proves that ℓ(Σ) is defined over R. Assume that f = t, where t = 0. Set g := f . Assume first that ℓ(Σ) n/2 6 n/2−1 is not isotropic. We can then assume that x1 belongs to ℓ(Σ). Equation (6.17) for i = n/2 implies that ∂g = nt x , for j 2. So g = nt (x2 + + x2 )+ cx2. Equation (6.16) yields ∂xj 2 j 4 2 N 1 2 ≥ · · · tn = ∆(g)= nt(N−1) + c, so c = −tn(n+N−1) . We get − 4 4 4 nt tn(N + n) f = (x2 + + x2 ) x2. n/2−1 4 1 · · · N − 4 1 2 2 Now, t is real, as is fn/2−1. The element x1 + + xN is independent of the choice of an · · ·tn(N+n) orthonormal basis and is thus real. The coefficient 4 is a non-zero real number. Hence, 2 x1 is real and the line ℓ(Σ) is defined over R. Assume that n is even and ℓ(Σ) is isotropic. We claim that fn/2 = 0. Set t := fn/2 and g := fn/2−1. We may assume that ℓ(Σ) is spanned by x1 + √ 1x2. Then x1 + √ 1x2 belongs ∂g nt − − to µ(Σ). Equation (6.17) for i = n/2 implies that = xj, for j 3 and ∂xj 2 ≥ (n/2)(x + √ 1x )t = gy(x + √ 1x )∗ 1 − 2 1 − 2 So nt nt f = (x2 + + x2 )+ (x + √ 1x )(x √ 1x )+ a(x + √ 1x )2, n/2−1 4 3 · · · N 4 1 − 2 1 − − 2 1 − 2 for some scalar a. Equation (6.16) yields tn2 nt nt nNt = ∆(f )= (N 2) + = . − 4 n/2−1 4 − 2 4 Hence, t = 0 as claimed. We conclude once again that ℓ(Σ) is defined over R. Step 3: The subalgebra a of gC generated by m(Σ) and its complex conjugate m(Σ) is equal to the subalgebra gC,ℓ(Σ) of gC annihilating ℓ(Σ), by Lemma 6.7. The subalgebra m(Σ) is 38 EYAL MARKMAN contained in gC,f , since f is rational and m(Σ) is contained in gC,f . Hence, gC,ℓ(Σ) is contained in gC,f . n ˜ Let λ be a non-zero element of ℓ(Σ). The trivial gC,ℓ(Σ)-submodule in Sym (H(X, C)) has n−2i i ⌊n/2⌋ the basis λ q˜ i=0 , whereq ˜ is the gC-invariant degree 2 element given in Example 5.2. n { } n−2 ∆ : Sym (H˜ (X, C)) Sym (H˜ (X, C)) is a surjective gC-modules homomorphism, hence it → induces a surjective homomorphism of the respective trivial gC,ℓ(Σ)-submodules. We conclude gC,ℓ(Σ) that the trivial gC,ℓ(Σ)-submodule ker(∆) of ker(∆) is one-dimensional. If ℓ(Σ) is isotropic, then λn spans ker(∆)gC,ℓ(Σ) , and so f is a scalar multiple of λn. We conclude that ℓ(Σ)n is defined over Q, hence so is ℓ(Σ), by Lemma 6.8. If ℓ(Σ) is non-isotropic, then the projection of λn to ker(∆) spans ker(∆)gC,ℓ(Σ) , and so f n belongs to the projection of ℓ(Σ) . Hence, gC,f is contained in gC,ℓ(Σ). The equality gC,ℓ(Σ) = gC,f follows, regardless of whether ℓ(Σ) is isotropic. It remains to prove that ℓ(Σ) is defined over Q when ℓ(Σ) is non-isotropic. The quadric Q in P(H(X, C)) of isotropic lines is defined over Q and the morphism N + 1 P(H(X, C)) Q Gr , gC , e \ → 2 sending ℓ to gC,ℓ, is defined overe Q (and is thus equivariant with respect to the group of field automorphisms of C, and is injective. Hence, if gC,ℓ is defined over Q, then so is ℓ, as both are invariant under all field automorphisms of C. We already know that gC,ℓ(Σ) = gC,f is defined over Q. Hence, so it ℓ(Σ). 6.3. The LLV subspace of an object in Db(X). The Mukai vector of an object F Db(X) ∗ ∈ is the class v(F ) := ch(F )√tdX in H (X, Q). Let gv(F ) be the subalgebra of g annihilating v(F ). HT HT ˜ Let obsF be the obstruction map (3.1) and set Σ(F ) := ker obsF . Let Σ(F ) be the image of the subspace Σ(F ) of HT 2(X) via the graded Duflo isomorphism D : HT ∗(X) HT ∗(X), → given by contraction with √tdX . ˜ HT Σ(F ) := D(Σ(F )) = D ker obsF . Lemma 6.10. Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold and F Db(X) an object. The image m(Σ(˜ F )) of the subspace Σ(˜ F ) of HT 2(X) via (6.9) is contained∈ in the complexification of gv(F ).

Proof. The image m(Σ(˜ F )) is contained in gC, by Corollary 6.2. We prove that it annihilates v(F ) in two steps. Step 1: Let ∆ : X X X be the diagonal embedding. Then HHi(X) := Hom(∆ , ∆ [i]) → × ∗OX ∗OX and HH (X) := Hom(∆ [i], ∆ ), where ∆ is the left adjoint of ∆∗. We have ∆ = i !OX ∗OX ! !OX ∼ ∆ ω−1[ 2n], where dim(X) = 2n. Hence, HH (X) = Hom(∆ ω−1[ 2n], ∆ ). Elements ∗ X − 0 ∗ X − ∗OX of HHi(X) yield natural transformations from the identity functor id of Db(X) to id[i]. We get the homomorphism obs : HH2(X) Hom(F, F [2]) sending α to the value α of the F → F natural transformation on the object F . The Chern character ch(F ) is defined as an element ′ of HH0(X) [Ca2, Def. 6.2]. We prove first that the kernel Σ (F ) of obsF is contained in the ideal of HH∗(X) annihilating ch(F ). f b Given a smooth complex projective variety Y and an object E of D (Y ), let Let T rY : Hom(E, E ω [dim Y ]) Cfbe the Serre’s Duality trace (see [Ca2, Sec. 2]). The Chern ⊗ Y → VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 39 character ch(F ) satisfies T r (ch(F ) ν)= T r (ν ), X×X ◦ X F for all ν fHom(∆ , ∆ ω [2n]), where ν Hom(F, F ω [2n]) is the value on F of the ∈ ∗OX ∗ X F ∈ ⊗ X natural transformation ν from id to the Serref functor of tensorization by ωX [2n] [Ca2, Def. 6.2]. 2 In particular, for every α HH (X) and β Hom(∆∗ X , ∆∗ωX [2n 2]), setting ν = α β above we get ∈ ∈ O − ◦ T r ([ch(F ) α] β)= T r (α β ). X×X ◦ ◦ X F ◦ F −1 If αF = 0, then the element ch(F ) α of HH−2(X) = Hom(∆∗ω [ 2 2n], ∆∗ X ) pairs to zero ◦ f X − − O with every class β as above. Hence, ch(F ) α = 0, because the trace pairing is non-degenerate. Step 2: Consider the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenbergf ◦ isomorphisms f IHKR : HT ∗(X) HH∗(X), → I : HH (X) HΩ (X). HKR ∗ → ∗ K HKR −1 Set I := I D and let IK be given by IK (α)= IHKR(α)√tdX . We have IK (ch(F )) = ◦ K ch(F )√tdX = v(F ), by [Ca3, Theorem 4.5], and IK(I (α) ch(F )) = α IK(ch(F )), for all α HT ∗(X), by [CBR, Theorem 1.4]. Hence, the image via (◦IK )−1 of the kernel· Σ′(Ff) of obs ∈ F annihilates v(F ), by Step 1 of the proof. f f (6.18) m (IK )−1(Σ′(F )) g . ⊂ C,v(F ) HKR 2 We have obsF (I (α)) = (expaF )(α), for all α HT (X), by [Hua, Theorem A]. Hence, HKR ∈ HT ′ I maps the kernel Σ(F ) of the obstruction map obsF , given in (3.1), to the kernel Σ (F ) K −1 ′ of obsF . So(I ) (Σ (F )) = D(Σ(F )) = Σ(˜ F ). We conclude that m(Σ(˜ F )) annihilates v(F ), by Equation (6.18). Let X bea2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Composing the ho- 2 ∗ momorphism m : HT (X) gC, given in Equation (6.9), with the inclusion gC End(H (X, C)) followed by evaluation at v→(F ) we get the cohomological obstruction map ⊂ obsCoh : HT 2(X) H∗(X, C). F → Definition 6.11. (1) We say that an object F in Db(X) deforms in co-dimension c, if the kernel Σ(F ) of the obstruction map (3.1) has co-dimension c in HT 2(X). Coh (2) We say that F has a rank c cohomological obstruction map, if rank(obsF )= c, i.e., if 2 the annihilator gv(F ) of the Mukai vector v(F ) intersects m(HT (X)) in a co-dimension c subspace of the latter. (3) If F is θ-twisted of non-zero rank, we say that F has a rank c cohomological obstruction map if the assumption in Part (2) holds with v(F ) replaced byv ¯(F ) := κ(F )√tdX . If F deforms in co-dimension c, then F has a rank c cohomological obstruction map, since ˜ ≤ m(Σ(F )) is contained in gv(F ) by Lemma 6.10. Let k be a positive integer. If Fi, 1 i k, each deforms in co-dimension one and each k ≤ ≤ has positive rank, then i=1Fi deforms in co-dimension 2. Indeed, in this case Σ(Fi) does 2 ⊗ ≤ not contain H ( X ), as was explained in the proof of Proposition 3.3, and so the intersection Σ(F ) [H1(T XO) H2( )] is the graph of a linear homomorphism θ : H1(T X) H2( ) i ∩ ⊕ OX i → OX and F deforms in the direction ξ + θ (ξ) for all ξ H1(T X). Then k F deforms in the i i ∈ ⊗i=1 i 40 EYAL MARKMAN direction ξ + ( k θ )(ξ), for each ξ H1(T X). So Σ( k F ) [H1(T X) H2( )] contains i=1 i ∈ ⊗i=1 i ∩ ⊕ OX the graph of k θ . The linear homomorphism θ is computed in Lemma 6.22 below. Pi=1 i i Definition 6.12.P The LLV subspace of an object F in Db(X), is the subspace of H˜ (X, Q) given by W (F ) := µ(Σ(˜ F )⊥) generalizing Equation (6.13). Note that F deforms in co-dimension dim(W (F )). If one-dimensional, the LLV subspace W ( k F ) of the tensor product discussed above is described by Theorem 6.13 (3), while if ⊗i=1 i it is two dimensional it is computed in Lemma 6.22. Given a subspace W H˜ (X, Q), let gW be the subalgebra of g annihilating W . If F has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction⊂ map, and ∗ the projectionv ˆ(F ) of v(F ) to SH (X) does not vanish, then gv(F ) = gℓ(F ), for a rational line ℓ(F ) in H˜ (X, Q), by Lemma 6.9 applied with f = Ψ(ˆv(F )). The equality ℓ(F )= W (F ) holds, if furthermore F deforms in co-dimension 1. 6.4. The LLV line. Theorem 6.13. Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold and F Db(X) an object which deforms in co-dimension 1, so that Σ(˜ F ) has co-dimension one in∈ HT 2(X). Denote by ℓ(F ) the line ℓ(Σ(˜ F )) in H˜ (X, C) given in (6.13). Assume10 that the projection vˆ(F ) of v(F ) to SH∗(X) via (5.8) does not vanish.

(1) The line ℓ(F ) is deﬁned over Q and gv(F ) is equal to the Lie subalgebra gℓ(F ) annihilating ℓ(F ). (2) The embedding Ψ, given in (5.4), maps vˆ(F ) into the image of ℓ(F )n via the projection (5.7). (3) If the rank r of F does not vanish, then the line ℓ(F ) is spanned by an element of the form rα + c (F )+ s(F )β, for some s(F ) Q. 1 ∈ (4) Given an equivalence Φ : Db(X) Db(Y ), let H˜ (φ) : H˜ (X, Q) H˜ (Y, Q) be its → → associated isometry via the functor (5.1). We have ℓ(Φ(F )) = H˜ (φ)(ℓ(F )).

Proof. Part (1) The inclusion gℓ(F ) gv(F ) follows from the assumption that Σ(F ) has co- 2 ⊂ dimension one in HT (X), Lemma 6.7, and Lemma 6.10. The equality gℓ(F ) = gvˆ(F ) and the fact that ℓ(F ) is deﬁned over Q both follow from Lemma 6.9, by letting f be Ψ(ˆv(F )). We conclude that g = g from the evident inclusion g g . ℓ(F ) v(F ) v(F ) ⊂ vˆ(F ) Part (2) follows from Lemma 6.9, by letting f be Ψ(ˆv(F )). (3) The class κ(F ) is g¯-invariant, by Proposition 3.3. Hence, so is κ(F )√tdX . Set g := exp(e ) SO(H˜ (X, Q)). Then g acts on Hev(X, C), via (6.7), and κ(F )√td = g(v(G)), −c1(F )/r ∈ X by Theorem 2.2. The map F ℓ(F ) factors through v and the map v(F ) ℓ(F ) extends to an 7→ 7→ SO(H˜ (X, C))-equivariant map from the SO(H˜ (X, C))-orbit of v(F ) to the SO(H˜ (X, C))-orbit of ℓ(F ), since the embedding Ψ, the two projections (5.7) and (5.8), and the n-power map ℓ(F ) ℓ(F )n, are all SO(H˜ (X, Q))-equivariant. Hence, g(ℓ(F )) is g¯-invariant. So g(ℓ(F )) is 7→ contained in UQ.

10 The assumption holds if rank(F ) 6= 0, or c1(F ) 6= 0. The assumption depends only on the orbit of v(F ) under the derived monodromy group. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 41

Let w be a non-zero vector in ℓ(F ). Write w = r0α + λ + sβ H˜ (X, Q), with r0,s Q, and 2 ∈ ′ ∈ λ H (X, Q). Note that r0 = 0. Indeed, exp(eλ′ )(v(F )) is not g¯-invariant, for λ = c1(F )/r, ′∈ 2 6 6 − λ H (X, Q), and so neither is exp(eλ′ )(ℓ(F )), by the equivariance of the map v(F ) ℓ(F ). ∈ ′ 27→ But if r0 = 0, then ℓ(F ) is g¯-invariant, if and only if exp(eλ′ )(ℓ(F )) is, for all λ H (X, Q). ′ ′ ∈ r0 ′ (λ,λ ) r0(λ,λ ) Now, exp(e ′ ′ )w = r α + λ ′ λ + s ′ + β belongs to UQ if and only −λ /r 0 − r − r 2(r′)2 if λ′/r′ = λ/r . We know that exp(e )w belongs to U . Hence, λ/r = c (F )/r and 0 −c1(F )/r Q 0 1 (r/r0)w has the stated form. (4) Let φ : H∗(X, Q) H∗(Y, Q) be the isomorphism associated to Φ. Then φ(v(F )) = v(Φ(F )) and so φ(ˆv(F )) =→v ˆ(Φ(F )). Theorem 5.3 yields the commutative diagram

ǫ(H˜ (φ))φ SH∗(X, Q) / SH∗(Y, Q)

ΨX ΨY ker(∆X ) / ker(∆Y ), Symn(H˜ (φ)) where ∆ : Symn(H˜ (X, Q)) Symn−2(H˜ (X, Q)) is given in (5.6) and ∆ is its analogue. X → Y Hence, Symn(H˜ (φ)) maps Ψ(ˆv(F )) to Ψ(ˆv(Φ(F ))). This means that Symn(H˜ (φ)) maps the n n projection of ℓ(F ) in ker(∆X ) to the projection of ℓ(F ) in ker(∆Y ). The map sending ℓ(F ) n to the projection of ℓ(F ) , is injective, by the equality gC,vˆ(F ) = gC,ℓ(F ) in Lemma 6.9. Hence, H˜ (φ)(ℓ(F )) = ℓ(Φ(F )).

Remark 6.14. Assume that the rank of F is non-zero and X is of K3[2] or K3[3]-type. Then v(F ) is determined by its rank and the line ℓ(F ), by parts (2) and (3) of Theorem 6.13, since vˆ(F ) = v(F ) in this case. If X is of K3[2]-type the equalityv ˆ(F ) = v(F ) follows from the equality H∗(X, Q)= SH∗(X, Q). When X is of K3[3]-type, H∗(X, Q) decomposes as the direct ∗ Q ∗ Q 2 ˜ Q sum of two irreducible g-module H (X, ) ∼= SH (X, ) H(X, ), by [GKLR, Cor. 3.2]. 2 ⊕∧ The projection of v(F ) to H˜ (X, Q) must vanish, since the gℓ-invariant subspace of the latter vanishes. Hence, v(F ) is contained∧ in SH∗(X, Q) and again we get the equalityv ˆ(F )= v(F ).

Let D˜ : H˜ (X, Q) H˜ (X, Q) be given by D˜ (rα+λ+sβ)= rα λ+sβ. Let D : Hev(X, Q) Hev(X, Q) be the automorphism→ of the even cohomology ring acting− on H2i(X, Q) by ( 1)→i. If Σ(F ) has codimension one in HT 2(X), then so does the subspace Σ(F ∨) of the dual object− F ∨. Lemma 6.15. ℓ(F ∨)= D˜ (ℓ(F )).

Proof. Let Π : Symn(H˜ (X, Q)) ker(∆) be the projection (5.7). Then Π commutes with → Symn(D˜). The projection (5.8) commutes with D. The isometry Ψ : SH∗(X, Q) ker(∆), → given in (5.4), satisﬁes Ψ(D(θ)) = Symn(D˜ )(Ψ(θ)), for all θ SH∗(X, Q). The n-th power ∈ map satisﬁes Symn(D˜ )(λn) = (D˜ (λ))n, for all λ H˜ (X, Q). Let λ be a non-zero vector in ℓ(F ) satisfying Ψ(ˆv(F )) = Π(λn). Then ∈ Ψ(ˆv(F ∨)) = Ψ(D(ˆv(F ))) = Symn(D˜)(Ψ(ˆv(F ))) = Symn(D˜)(Π(λn)) = Π(D˜ (λ)n). Hence, D˜(λ) spans ℓ(F ∨). 42 EYAL MARKMAN

Example 6.16. Let X bea2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. Given ∗ a closed point z X we have ℓ( z) = spanQ β . Indeed, v( z) = [pt] belongs to SH (X, Q) n ∈ O { } O and Ψ(1) = β /cX , by (5.5). We will need the following multiplication table in the cohomology of X of K3[2]type, where 2 α is a class in H (X) and c2 is c2(T X). 2 1 α α c2 c2α [pt] 2 (α,α) α α 10 c2α c2α 30(α, α)[pt] 0  2 (α,α) 2  (6.19) α 10 c2α 3(α, α) [pt] 30(α, α)[pt] 0 0    c2 c2α 30(α, α)[pt] 828[pt] 0 0     c2α 30(α, α)[pt] 0 0 0 0     [pt] 0 0 0 0 0    Given classes α, β, γ, δ in H2(X), we have αβγδ = [(α, β)(γ, δ) + (α, γ)(β, δ) + (α, δ)(β, γ)][pt]. Example 6.17. Assume X is of K3[2]-type. We claim that ℓ( ) = span 4α + 5β . We have OX Q{ } v( )= √td =1+ 1 c (X)+ 25 [pt]. Set OX X 24 2 32 23 1 (6.20) b := y2/(y ,y ), X 23 i i i 1 X where y is an orthogonal basis of H2(X, Q). We have y4 = 3(y ,y )2 and for i = j we { i} X i i i 6 have y2y2 = (y ,y )(y ,y ), due to the vanishing of (y ,y ). Hence, X i j i i j j i Rj R 23 2 1 2 2 2 1 4 25 bX = 2 yi yj + 2 yi = , X 23  (yi,yi)(yj,yj) X (yi,yi) X  23 Z Xi

(6.23) Ψ(c2(T X)) = 30(˜q + αβ), 1 5 25 1 5 5 (6.24) Ψ( td ) = α2 + (˜q + αβ)+ β2 = (α + β)2 + q˜ , X 2 2 16 2 4 2 p VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 43 whereq ˜ is deﬁned in Example 5.2 and we used the equality

1 (6.25)q ˜ = [23˜b 2αβ]. 25 X −

1 5 2 The right hand side of the latter displayed equation is the projection of 2 (α + 4 β) from Sym2(H˜ (X, Q)) to the image of Ψ, by Example 5.2. So ℓ( ) = span 4α + 5β as claimed. OX Q{ } More generally, we have the following.

Lemma 6.18. Let X be a 2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. There exists a rational number t, such that tn = n! √td and ℓ( ) = span α + tβ . If X is of cX X X X Q [n] O { } K3 -type, n 2, then ℓ( X ) = spanQ 4α +R (n + 3)β . If X is deformation equivalent to a 2n-dimensional≥ generalizedO Kummer, n { 2, then ℓ( )} = span 4α + (n + 1)β . ≥ OX Q{ }

4i Proof. Let τ2i be the graded summand of √tdX in H (X, Q). So τ0 = 1 and τ2n = s[pt] [n] for s := X √tdX . It is known that s > 0, by [HSa, Sec. 6]. If X is of K3 -type, then (n+3)n s = 4nn!R, by [Sa, Prop. 19]. If X is deformation equivalent to a 2n-dimensional generalized (n+1)n+1 Kummer, then s = 4n(n!) , by [Sa, Prop. 21]. Choose a basis of H(X, Q) consisting of α, 2 β, and a basis of H (X, Q). We get a well defined notion of the degree degα(f) of an element n e ∗ of Sym H(X, Q) in α. Define degβ(f) similarly. Letτ ¯2i be the projection of τ2i to SH (X). n n Note thatτ ¯0 = τ0 = 1 andτ ¯2n = τ2n = s[pt]. Then Ψ(¯τ0) = α /n!, Ψ(¯τ2n) = sβ /cX , and for 1 i ne 1 we have deg (Ψ(¯τ )) < n and deg (Ψ(¯τ )) < n, by definition of Ψ. We know ≤ ≤ − α 2i β 2i that ℓ( X ) = span α + tβ , for some t Q, by Theorem 6.13. Furthermore, the projection of On { } ∈ n (α + tβ) to ker(∆) is a rational scalar multiple of Ψ( i=0 τ¯2i), by Theorem 6.13. Let V (d) be the kernel of ∆ : Symd(H(X, Q)) Symd−2(H(X, Q)). We have the decomposition into → P irreducible so(H(X, Q))-sub-representations e e e Symn(H(X, Q)) = ⌊n/2⌋q˜jV (n 2j), ⊕j=0 − e whereq ˜ is defined in Example 5.2 (see the proof of [LL, Prop. 2.14]). Now degα(˜q) = degβ(˜q)= 1, and so only the direct summand V (n) in the above decomposition of Symn(H(X, Q)) contains n elements f with degα(f)= n and similarly for degβ. Thus the coefficient of α in the projection n of 1 (α + tβ)n to ker(∆) = V (n) is 1 and the coefficient of βn is t . Hence, ten = s(n!) . We see n! n! n! cX n n+3 n [n] n n+1 n that t = 4 in the K3 -type and t = 4 in the generalized Kummer case. If n is odd, we are done. If n is even it remains to prove that t> 0. The inequality t> 0 is equivalent to (α + tβ,α +tβ) < 0. The inequality (α + tβ,α + tβ) < 0 follows from Remark 6.26 for X of K3[n]-type. Below we will prove the inequality t > 0 directly in the K3[n] and generalized Kummer deformation types. 44 EYAL MARKMAN

The coefficient of αn−1β in the projection of (α + tβ)n to ker(∆) = V (n) has the same sign as t. Indeed, we have ∆(˜bX )= ∆(˜q) = 1, ∆ αn−1β + (n 1)αn−2˜b = (n 1)(α, β)αn−2 + (n 1)αn−2∆(˜b ) = 0, − X − − X b (X) + 2 2 ˜b = 2 q˜ + αβ, X b (X) b (X) 2 2 (n 1)(b (X) + 2) b (X) + 2n 2 αn−1β + (n 1)αn−2˜b = − 2 αn−2q˜ + 2 − αn−1β. − X b (X) b (X) 2 2 Multiplying both sides of the last equation by b2(X) we see that the projection of αn−1β b2(X)+2n−2 to ker(∆) is b (X) 2 αn−1β + (n 1)αn−2˜b , b (X) + 2n 2 − X 2 − and the coefficient of αn−1β is indeed positive.h i n n−1 The only term in i=0 Ψ(¯τ2i) that contributes to the coefficient of α β is Ψ(¯τ2), by def- n−1 inition of Ψ. It suffices to show that the coefficient of α β in Ψ(¯τ2) is positive. Now, P 4 τ2 = c2(T X)/24. The projection of c2(T X) to SH (X) is monodromy invariant, hence a multiple of bX , and we claim that it is a positive multiple. Indeed, given a line bundle L on X, the co- 2n−2 n−1 c1(L) c2(TX) efficient of (c1(L), c1(L)) in the formula for X ch(L)tdX depends only on X (2n−2)! 12 n−1 and it is positive, by [Hu4, Examples 7 and 8], as is the coefficient of (c1(L), c1(L)) in 2n−2 R R the formula for X bX c1(L) , by [O4, Eq. (2.1.4)]. We conclude that Ψ(¯τ2) is a positive scalar multiple of Ψ(b ). Finally, the coefficient of αn−1β in Ψ(b ) = 1 αn−2[˜b + αβ] is R X X (n−2)! X positive. The computations of Example 6.17 generalize to yield the following statement. Lemma 6.19. Let X be of K3[2]-type and F an object of Db(X) of non-zero rank.

(1) If F deforms in co-dimension 1, then κ3(F ) = 0 and κ(F )= x + yc2(T X)+ z[pt], where x,y,z Q and ∈ (6.26) 450y2 + 3xy xz = 0. − In this case, 5x2 (c (F ), c (F )) (6.27) ℓ(F ) = span x2α + xc (F )+ + 30xy + 1 1 β . 1 4 2 2 (2) Conversely, if κ3(F ) = 0, κ(F )= x + yc2(T X)+ z[pt], and 450y + 3xy xz = 0, then F has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map. − b (3) If F1, F2 D (X) are of non-zero rank and F1, F2, and F1 F2, all deform in co- dimension∈1, then κ(F ) is a scalar multiple of κ( ), for i =⊗ 1 or i = 2. i OX Proof. 1) The class κ(F ) remains of Hodge type under every K¨ahler deformation of X, by Proposition 3.3. Hence, κ3(F )=0 and κ2(F ) is a scalar multiple of c2(T X). We have 1 25 κ(F ) td = (x + yc (X)+ z[pt]) 1+ c (X)+ [pt] X 2 24 2 32 p = x + (x/24 + y)c2(X) + (z + 25x/32 + 69y/2)[pt]. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 45

Set t = x/24 + y and s = z + 25x/32 + 69y/2. We have 2 2 Ψ(x + tc2(X)+ s[pt]) = xα /2 + 30t(˜q + αβ)+ sβ x 60t 2s = 30tq˜ + α2 + αβ + β2 . 2 x x The latter belongs to the projection via (5.7) of the square of a line, if and only if 450t2 = sx, in which case it belongs to the projection of the square of span α+ 30t β = span α+ 5 + 30y β , { x } { 4 x } by Example 5.2. This is the case, if and only if 450y2 + 3xy xz = 0. The equality v(F) = − √ 5 30y exp(ec1(F )/x)κ(F ) tdX implies that ℓ(F ) is spanned by exp(ec1(F )/x) α + 4 + x β , by the SO(H(X, Q))-equivariance of Ψ. Finally observe that

5 30y 5 (c1(F ), c1(F )) exp(ec (F )/x) α + + β = α + c1(F )/x + + 30y/x + β. 1 4 x 4 2x2 2) The assumptions imply that Ψ(κ(F )√tdX ) is invariant under the stabilizer of the line in Equation (6.27) in the LLV algebra g := so(H˜ (X, Q)). Hence, κ(F )√tdX is invariant under this subalgebra, by the g-equivariance of Ψ. 3) Set κ(Fi)= xi + yic2(X)+ zi[pt]. Then κ(F F )= x x + [x y + x y ]c (X) + [x z + x z + 828y y ][pt]. 1 ⊗ 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 Sety ¯ := y /x andz ¯ = z /x . Equation (6.26) for F F translates to the vanishing of i i i i i i 1 ⊗ 2 450(¯y +y ¯ )2 + 3(¯y +y ¯ ) (¯z +z ¯ + 828¯y y¯ ) = 1 2 1 2 − 1 2 1 2 (450¯y2 + 3¯y z¯ ) + (450¯y2 + 3¯y z¯ ) + 72¯y y¯ = 72¯y y¯ . 1 1 − 1 2 2 − 2 1 2 1 2 Hence, yi = 0, for i =1 or i = 2. Equation (6.26) and the vanishing of yi imply that zi =0 as well. Remark 6.20. Theorem 6.13 imposes the following cohomological constraint on the Todd class of a 2n dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold X. Denote byc ˆ2k the projection 4k of c2k(X) to the primitive subspace of H (X, Q) defined in [LL, Cor. 1.13]. Thenc ˆ2k generates an irreducible subrepresentation g(ˆc ) of the LLV algebra g isomorphic to the subspace V (n 2k) 2k − of Symn−2kH˜ (X, Q) spanned by powers of isotropic classes, by [LL, Lemma 2.8]. The direct sum ⌊n/2⌋g(ˆc ) is the minimal g invariant subspace containing √td . Theorem 6.13 implies ⊕k=0 2k X that the projection of √td to g(ˆc ) spans the image of the power ℓ( )n−2k of the same line X 2k OX ℓ( ) under the unique, up to scalar, isomorphism g(ˆc ) = V (n 2k). Note that when X is OX 2k ∼ − of K3[n]-type and n 4, thenc ˆ is non-trivial for 1 k n/2, by [Ma2, Theorem 1.10]. ≥ 2k ≤ ≤ Theorem 6.13 lists topological consequences about the Mukai vector of an object F deforming in co-dimension 1 (Definition 6.11). We emphasize next the evident fact that these topological consequences remain valid under deformations of the pair (X, F ). For simplicity we restrict to the case of locally free sheaves. Let π : B be a smooth and proper morphism over a connected analytic space B, all of which fibersX are → irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds. 2 ∗ Let θ be a class in H ( , X ), in the analytic topology, and let be a locally free θ-twisted X O F 2 ∗ sheaf of rank r. Denote by Xb the fiber of π over a point b of B and by θb H (Xb, ) and ∈ OXb F the restrictions of θ and to X . The rational LLV lattices H˜ (X , Q) then form a local b F b b 46 EYAL MARKMAN system Qα R2π Q Qβ, where Qα Qβ is a trivial local subsystem. Denote by g(X ) the ⊕ ∗ ⊕ ⊕ b ˆ ∗ LLV Lie algebra of Xb. Setv ¯(Fb) := κ(Fb) tdXb and let v¯(Fb) be its projection to SH (Xb, Q). 11 Corollary 6.21. Assume that for somep point b0 of B the class θb0 is trivial and that Fb0 deforms in co-dimension 1. Then

ℓ0 := exp e (ℓ(Fb )) −c1(Fb0 )/r 0 is a line in Qα Qβ and the following statements hold for every b B. ⊕ ∈ (1) The subalgebra g(Xb)ℓ0 of g(Xb) annihilating the line ℓ0 is equal to the subalgebra 2 g(Xb)v¯(Fb) annihilating the class v¯(Fb). In particular, v¯(Fb) is annihilated by so(H (Xb, Q)). ∗ n (2) The embedding Ψ : SH (Xb, Q) Sym H˜ (Xb, Q), given in (5.4), maps v¯ˆ(Fb) into the n → image of the n-th power ℓ0 of ℓ0 via the projection (5.7). Proof. The line ℓ is in Qα Qβ, by Theorem 6.13(3). The statements hold for X , by the 0 ⊕ b0 equivariance of Ψ with respect to the isometry exp e and by Theorem 6.13 parts (1) −c1(Fb0 )/r and (2). It follows for all b B, by the ﬂatness of the section associated to κ( )√tdπ in Rπ∗Q and the assumption that the∈ base B is connected. F

Lemma 6.22. Assume that Fi, 1 i k, each deforms in co-dimension one and its rank ri is positive. Then the following statements≤ ≤ hold. (1) Σ(F ) [H1(T X) H2( )] is the graph of the homomorphism θ : H1(T X) H2( ) i ∩ ⊕ OX i → OX given by λ mλ (c1(Fi)/ri). 7→ − k (2) The LLV subspace W ( F ) is contained in exp e k (span α, β ). i=1 i c1(Fi)/ri Q ⊗ Pi=1 { } 2 0,0 Proof. (1) The isomorphism µ : HT (X) H˜ (X, C), given by µ(λ) = mλ(σ) in (6.10), 1 2 1,1 → maps H (T X) H ( X ) to H (X) Cβ (see Equation (6.11)). The homomorphism µ maps 1 ⊕ O2 ⊥⊕ 1,1 1,1 Σ(Fi) [H (T X) H ( X )] to ℓ(Fi) [H (X) Cβ], hence to the graph of θ˜i : H (X) ∩ ˜ ⊕ O ∩ ⊕ → Cβ given by θi(x) = (x, c1(Fi)/ri)β, by Theorem 6.13(3). We have mθi(λ)(σ) = µ(θi(λ)) = θ˜ (µ(λ)) = (m (σ), c (F )/r )β, for all λ H1(T X). Pairing with α, we get: i λ 1 i i ∈ (α, µ(θ (λ))) = (m (α),σ), i − θi(λ) (α, θ˜ (µ(λ))) = (m (σ), c (F )/r ) = (σ, m (c (F )/r )). i − λ 1 i i λ 1 i i It remains to prove that m (α)= θ (λ). Now, m = η e η−1, by Equation (6.4), and θi(λ) i θi(λ) ◦ θi(λ) ◦ η e η−1 = e , since θ (λ) belongs to H2( 0T X), and e (α) = θ (λ), by deﬁnition ◦ θi(λ) ◦ θi(λ) i ∧ θi(λ) i (Eq. (2.2)). k 1 2 k 1 (2) The intersection Σ( i=1Fi) [H (T X) H ( X )] is the graph of i=1 θi : H (T X) 2 ⊗ ∩ ⊕ O → H ( X ), as observed in Section 6.3. Hence, µ maps the intersection to the graph of the O P 11 ˜ Strictly speaking, F is a twisted sheaf with respect to a co-cycle θ representing the class θ and Fb0 is a ˜ ˜ ˜ twisted sheaf with respect to the restriction θb0 of θ. The co-cycle θb0 is a co-boundary. We then abuse notation and denote by Fb0 also an untwisted coherent sheaf under an equivalence of the category of coherent sheaves ˜ on Xb0 with the category of θb0 -twisted sheaves. The isomorphism depends on a choice of a 1-co-chain whose co-boundary is θ˜b0 , and so is unique up to tensorization by a line-bundle. In particular, the condition that Fb0 deforms in co-dimension 1 is independent of the choice of the equivalence. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 47 homomorphism from H1,1(X) to Cβ given by k x x, c1(Fi)/ri β, 7→ ! Xi=1 1,1 by the proof of Part (1). The latter graph is precisely exp e k (H (X)). The c1(Fi)/ri Pi=1 k subspace W ( F ) is thus contained in the subspace exp e k (span α, β ) or- i=1 i c1(Fi)/ri Q ⊗ Pi=1 { } 1,1 thogonal to exp e k (H (X)). c1(Fi)/ri Pi=1 6.5. Torsion sheaves which deform in co-dimension 1 are supported on lagrangian subvarieties or points. Let X bea2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic man- 0 2 ifold. Let σ be a non-zero class in H (X, ΩX ). Lemma 6.23. Let F be an object of Db(X) such that F has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map (Def. 6.11). Assume that the line ℓ(F ) in H˜ (X, Q) is spanned by a class of the form 0α + λ + sβ, where λ is a class in H2(X, Q). Then ch (F ) = 0, for i

n n Assume that λ = 0. Let ω be a K¨ahler class on X such that (λ, ω) = 0. Then Lω((λ+sβ) )= n n 6 6 n!(ω, λ) β does not vanish. Now Lω belongs to gC, Ψ is gC-equivariant, and Ψ(ˆv(ι∗F )) spans n n n ℓ(ι∗F ) . Hence, Lω does not annihilatev ˆ(ι∗F ) and thus neither v(ι∗F ). Now Lω annihilates 2i n the graded summand vi(ι∗F ) in H (X, Q), for i>n. Thus Lω(vn(ι∗F )) = 0. We conclude that Z is n-dimensional. The subvariety Z is lagrangian by the vanishing of6 ch (ι F ) σ. n ∗ ∪ Let ι : Z X be an embedding of a compact K¨ahler manifold as a holomorphic lagrangian → 2 2 submanifold. Assume that the obstruction map (3.1) from HT (X) to Ext (ι∗ Z , ι∗ Z ) has rank 1. Then the homomorphism H1(X,TX) H1(Z,N ), induced by theO sheafO homo- → Z/X morphism T X ι N , has rank 1. Conjugating via the isomorphisms T X = Ω1 and → ∗ Z/X ∼ X N = Ω1 , induced by the symplectic structure, we get that H1(X, Ω1 ) H1(Z, Ω1 ) has Z/X ∼ Z X → Z rank 1. The restriction homomorphism H2(X, C) H2(Z, C) factors through the latter, since Z is lagrangian, and hence has rank 1. Let L Pic(→ X) be a line bundle, such that the sub- ⊥ ∈ lattice c1(L) orthogonal to c1(L) with respect to the BBF-pairing is equal to the kernel of the restriction homomorphism ι∗ : H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z). Assume that there exists a class 2 ∗ → 1,1 τ H (X, Q), such that ι (τ)= c1(ωZ). This is the case if h (Z) = 1, as in Example 3.8, if Z is∈ a complex torus, or if Z is the zero subscheme of a global section of a rank n vector bundle on X. (τ, c (L)) Lemma 6.25. ℓ(ι ) is spanned by c (L) 1 β. ∗OZ 1 − 2

Proof. Let γ := rα + λ + sβ be a non-zero element of ℓ(ι∗ Z ). The restriction homomor- ∗ 2 2 O phism ι : H (X, X ) H (Z, Z ) vanishes, so ι∗ Z deforms along gerby deformations of X. 2 O → O O ∗ Hence, H (X, X ) is contained in Σ(ι∗ Z ). The Duflo automorphism of HT (X) restricts to 2 O 2 O 2 H (X, X ) as the identity, and so H (X, X ) is contained in Σ(˜ ι∗ Z ). Thus µ(H (X, X )) O O 2 O O is orthogonal to ℓ(ι∗ Z ), by Theorem 6.13. Now, µ(H (X, X )) = Cβ (see Equation (6.11)). Hence, β is orthogonalO to γ and thus the coefficient r of α isO 0. The sheaf ι deforms with X in a direction ξ H1(T X), if and only if the line bundle L ∗OZ ∈ does, by [Vo1]. Hence, µ(Σ(˜ ι ) H1(T X)) = c (L)⊥ H1,1(X) and λ is a non-zero scalar ∗OZ ∩ 1 ∩ multiple of c1(L). We may and thus do choose λ to be c1(L), so that γ = c1(L)+ sβ. ∨ ∨ We have ℓ((ι∗ Z ) )= D˜ (γ)= c1(L)+ sβ, by Lemma 6.15. Local duality yields (ι∗ Z ) = O ∨ − n ∨ O ∼ ι∗(ωZ)[ n], so that v((ι∗ Z ) ) = ( 1) exp(τ) v(ι∗ Z ). Hence, ℓ((ι∗ Z ) )= exp(eτ )(ℓ(ι∗ Z )), which is− spanned by exp(O e )(γ)=− c (L) ·[s + (Oτ, c (L))]β. ComparingO coefficients− of β Owe − τ − 1 − 1 get s = s (τ, c (L)), so s = (τ,c1(L)) . − − 1 − 2 Remark 6.26. Let S be a K3 surface and let ι : C S be an embedding of a smooth rational curve C. Set X := S[n], n 2. We get the embedding→ ι[n] : C(n) X of the n-th symmetric product of C, hence a lagrangian≥ Pn in X. Example 3.12 exhibits→ an auto-equivalence Φ : b b [n] b b D (S) D (S) which maps S to ι∗ωC. We get the auto-equivalence Φ : D (X) D (X) → O b →⊠n which maps X to the object in D (X) corresponding to the Sn-equivariant sheaf i=1ι∗ωC n O b [n] over S via the BKR-correspondence. The latter object in D (X) is isomorphic to ι∗ ωC(n) . [n] ˜ [n] [n] Hence, the isometry φ of H(X, Q) associated to Φ maps ℓ( X ) to ℓ(ι∗ ωC(n) ). The latter is spanned by a class γ of the form 0α+λ+sβ, where s Q and λOis a primitive class in H2(X, Z), ∈ such that λ⊥ is the kernel of the restriction homomorphism H2(X, Z) H2(C(n), Z). The class → VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 49

λ has BBF self-intersection 2(n + 3) [Ba, Theorem 3]. This agrees with the fact that ℓ( X ) is spanned by the class 2α +−n+3 β of self-intersection 2(n + 3) (see Lemma 6.18). O 2 − 7. Lagrangian surfaces in IHSMs of K3[2]-type In Section 7.1 we use the determination of ℓ(ι ) in Lemma 6.25 to calculate the Chern ∗OZ character of ι∗ Z for the embedding ι : Z X of a smooth lagrangian surface Z in X of K3[2]-type (LemmaO 7.1). In Section 7.2 we→ show that ι has a rank 1 cohomological ∗OZ obstruction map if Z is a smooth lagrangian surface in X of K3[2]-type with a rank 1 restriction 2 2 homomorphism H (X) H (Z) with an image containing c1(ωZ) (Lemma 7.3). Integral constraints on the topological→ invariants of such surfaces are presented in Section 7.3 (Lemma 7.6). In Section 7.4 we explain why examples of such smooth lagrangian subvarieties with a non-vanishing first Betti number may yield new examples of holomorphic symplectic varieties. 7.1. The Chern character of for a maximally deformable lagrangian surface Z. OZ Keep the notation and assumptions of Lemma 6.25. Set λ := c1(L) and assume that (λ, λ) = 0 and c (ω )= ι∗τ, for some τ H2(X, Q). Then 6 1 Z ∈ ∗ c1(ωZ )= tι λ, for some12 t Q, since λ does not belong to λ⊥. Set ∈ 5 χ(Z) (7.1) c := , 4 (λ, λ) 3 | | r where χ(Z) is the topological Euler characteristic of Z. The following Lemma expresses ch(ι ) in terms of χ(Z) and λ. ∗OZ Lemma 7.1. Assume, furthermore, that X is of K3[2]-type. Then χ(Z) > 0 and the following equalities hold. 4 3χ(Z) 6 (7.2) t2 = . 5 (λ, λ) − 5(λ, λ) p| | (λ, λ) t2(λ, λ)2 (7.3) χ( ) = c + . OZ 10 4 (λ, λ) (7.4) ch (ι ) = [Z]= c λ2 c (X) . 2 ∗OZ − 30 2 ct (7.5) ch (ι ) = λ3. 3 ∗OZ − 3 t2(λ, λ)2 (λ, λ) (7.6) ch (ι ) = c [pt]. 4 ∗OZ 4 − 10 Proof. Lemma 6.25 yields the equality t2(λ, λ)2 (7.7) Ψ(ch(ι ) td )= aΠ λ2 t(λ, λ)λβ + β2 , ∗OZ X − 4 p 12In Section 7.3 we will assume that λ is a primitive class and derive arithmetic constraints on χ(Z) and (λ,λ). This is the reason we introduce the variable t, rather than allow λ to be a rational class. 50 EYAL MARKMAN for some a Q, where Π is the projection from Sym2(H˜ (X, Q)) to ker(∆). We get ∈ 1 Ψ [Z]+ ch (ι )+ ch (ι )+ [Z]c (X) = 3 ∗OZ 4 ∗OZ 24 2 t2(λ, λ)2 a λ2 (λ, λ)˜q t(λ, λ)λβ + β2 − − 4 Comparing the weight (2, 2) summands we get Equation (7.4), with a instead of c, using also Example 5.2, Equation (6.23), and the equality Ψ(λ2)= λ2 + (λ, λ)αβ. We have (λ, λ) (λ, λ)2 48 χ(Z)= [Z]2 = a2 λ4 c (X)λ2 + c (X)2 = a2 (λ, λ)2. − 15 2 900 2 25 ZX ZX Hence, χ(Z) > 0 and a = c. Equation (7.5) follows from the equality Ψ(λ3) = 3(λ, λ)λβ, by comparing the weight (3, 3) summands. Equation (7.6) follows by equating the weight (4, 4) summands using Equation (7.4). Equation (7.3) follows from the equality 1 χ( )= χ(ι )= ch(ι )td = ch (ι )+ [Z]c (X) OZ ∗OZ ∗OZ X 4 ∗OZ 12 2 ZX ZX and (7.6). It remains to prove Equation (7.2). We have the short exact sequence 0 TZ ι∗T X N 0. → → → Z/X → ∗ The isomorphism TZ ∼= NZ/X yields 1+ ι∗c (T X) = 1 c (TZ)2 + 2c (TZ). 2 − 1 2 1 ∗ 2 Hence, c2(TZ)= 2 ι c2(T X)+ c1(ωZ) . The equality χ(Z)= Z c2(TZ) yields c (ω )2 = 2χ(Z) [Z]c (T X)R. 1 Z − 2 ZZ ZX Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch over Z yields the first equality below. 1 χ(Z) 1 χ( )= c (ω )2 + c (TZ) = [Z]c (T X). OZ 12 1 Z 2 4 − 12 2 ZZ ZX Equation (7.4) and the definition of c yield χ(Z) c(λ, λ) 1 (λ, λ) χ(Z) (7.8) χ( )= = χ(Z) . OZ 4 − 5 4 − (λ, λ) 3 | |r ! Comparing the right hand sides of the above equation with that of Equation (7.3) and solving for t2 we get Equation (7.2). Remark 7.2. Note that Equation (7.2) and the definition of c yield 48 6 (7.9) t2 = c . 25 − 5(λ, λ) The latter, combined with Equation (7.3), yields 1 (λ, λ) χ(Z) (7.10) χ( )= χ(Z) . OZ 4 − (λ, λ) 3 | | r ! VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 51

The above and the definition of χ(Z) yield the two linear equations in three variables. χ(Z) 2 = h1,1(Z) 2h2,0(Z), ± r 3 − χ(Z) 2 = h1,1(Z) + 2h2,0(Z) 4h1,0(Z), − − where the sign in the first equation is that of (λ, λ). If (λ, λ) > 0, then 1 χ(Z) (7.11) h2,0(Z) = χ(Z) + 4h1,0(Z) 4 , 4 " − r 3 − # 1 χ(Z) h1,1(Z) = χ(Z)+ + 4h1,0(Z) . 2 " r 3 # Equation (7.10) yields χ(Z) = 3 h1,1(Z) 2 2h2,0(Z) 2 (the Euler characteristic is 3 times the signature minus 2 squared), or equivalently,− − 1 2 h1,0(Z)= 2 + 2h2,0(Z)+ h1,1(Z) 3 h1,1(Z) 2 2h2,0(Z) . 4 − − − If h1,1(Z) = 1, then h1,0(Z) = 1 (5h2,0(Z) + 6h2,0(Z)2), so h1,0(Z) = h2,0(Z) = 0. If, for − 2 example, h2,0(Z) = 0, then the pair (h1,0(Z), h1,1(Z)) is either (0, 1), or (1, 2). The former is realized by P2, while the latter implies χ(Z) = 0 which is impossible if (λ, λ) = 0, by Lemma 7.1. If h2,0 = 1, then the pair (h1,0(Z), h1,1(Z)) is either (1, 3), or (2, 4). The latter6 is realized by a lagrangian abelian surface, while the former can not occur if (λ, λ) > 0, by Equation (7.11). More generally, the last displayed equality implies that h1,1(Z) and 2+2h2,0(Z) are “close”, in the sense that if 2 + 2h2,0(Z) = ah1,1(Z), then h1,1(Z) a+1 , since h1,0(Z) 0, so a is ≤ 3(a−1)2 ≥ close to 1 for large values of h1,1(Z). 7.2. Lagrangian surfaces Z with having a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map. OZ Lemma 7.3. Assume that X is of K3[2]-type and that ι∗ : H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z) has rank 1, ∗ ⊥ → Let L be the line bundle over X such that ker(ι ) = c1(L) . Assume that (c1(L), c1(L)) = 0 and that c (ω ) = tι∗c (L), for some t Q. Then g = g , where ℓ is spanned6 by 1 Z 1 ∈ v(ι∗OZ ) ℓ c (L) t (c1(L),c1(L)) β. 1 − 2 Proof. Set λ := c1(L). It suffices to verify Equation (7.7) with a = c. Equation (7.7) would follow once we verify Equations (7.4), (7.5), and (7.6). The class [Z] H4(X, Q) is invariant ∈ 2 under the stabilizer of λ in the monodromy group of X. Hence, [Z]= aλ + bc2(T X), for some 0 2 ∗ a, b Q. Let σ be a non-zero element of H (X, ΩX ). The pull back ι σ vanishes. Hence, the ∈ ∗ cohomology class [Z] σ vanishes, since X [Z] σ ( )= Z ι (σ) ( ). We drop the symbol below. We have ∪ ∪ ∪ • ∪ • ∪ R R 2 0= [Z]σσ¯ = [aλ + bc2(T X)]σσ¯ = a[2(λ, σ)(λ, σ¯) + (λ, λ)(σ, σ¯)] + 30b(σ, σ¯) ZX ZX and (λ, σ) = 0. Hence, b = a(λ, λ)/30 and Equation (7.4) holds with c replaced by a. The − 2 equality a = c is proven using the equality χ(Z)= X [Z] as in the proof of Lemma 7.1. Equation (7.6) is equivalent to Equation (7.3), by Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch (and the fact R 2 that Equation (7.4) is verified and the vanishing of the direct summand of tdX in H (X, Q)). 52 EYAL MARKMAN

Now Equation (7.3) follows from Equation (7.4) and the fact that Z is lagrangian, see the derivation of Equation (7.8) which exhibits χ( Z ) as a function of only χ(Z) and the sign of (λ, λ). O 3 It remains to prove Equation (7.5). The class ch3(ι∗ Z ) must be equal to aλ , for some a Q, as it is invariant under the stabilizer of λ in the monodromyO group of X. We need to prove∈ the equality a = ct/3. We calculate χ(ι∗(L⊗nt)) in two ways. Using Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch on X we get− the polynomial in n n4t4 χ(ι∗(L⊗nt)) = 1+ ntλ + + λ4 ch(ι )td . · · · 4! ∗OZ X ZX The coefficient of n1 is 3at(λ, λ)2. On the other hand, Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch on Z yields the second equality below: n(n 1) χ(ι∗(L⊗nt)) = χ(ω⊗n)= χ( )+ − c (ω )2. Z OZ 2 1 Z ZZ The coefficient of n1 is 1 1 (λ, λ) c (ω )2 = c(λ2 c (T X))t2λ2 = ct2(λ, λ)2. −2 1 Z −2 − 30 2 − ZZ ZX Comparing the two coefficients of n1 we get the equality a = ct/3. − Example 7.4. If we let Z = P2 in Lemma 7.1, then (λ, λ) = 10, the divisibility (Definition 1 3 − 3.14) of λ is 2, c = 8 , and t = 5 . If Z is the Fano variety of lines on a hyperplane section of a ± 5 cubic 4-fold, as in Example 3.11(2), then (λ, λ) = 6, the divisibility of λ is 2, c = 8 , and t = 1. If Z is the fixed locus of an anti-symplectic involution, as in Example 3.11, then (λ, λ) = 2, the divisibility of λ is 1, c = 5 (since χ(Z) = 192), and t = 3, by [F, Prop. 1.10]. 7.3. Integral constraints for the existence of smooth lagrangian surfaces. Lemma 7.5. Let X be of K3[2]-type and let λ be a primitive class in H2(X, Z). (1) If div(λ) = 1, then 1 5λ2 (λ,λ) c (T X) is a primitive class in H4(X, Z). gcd(5,(λ,λ)) − 6 2 1 2 (λ,λ) 4 Z (2) If div(λ) = 2, then (λ,λ) 5λ 6 c2(T X) is a primitive class in H (X, ). gcd40,5+ 2 − The proof of Lemma 7.5 uses the integral generators for the cohomology ring H∗(X, Z) found in [Ma0]. The proof is omitted. Smooth lagrangian surfaces satisfying the hypotheses of Lemma 7.1 must satisfy the following arithmetic constraints. Let c be the rational number given in Equation (7.1). Lemma 7.6. Let ι : Z X be an embedding of a smooth projective lagrangian surface in X of K3[2]-type. Assume that→ the kernel of the restriction homomorphism ι∗ : H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z) ⊥ → is equal to c1(L) for a line bundle L with primitive λ := c1(L), such that (λ, λ) > 0. Assume furthermore that c (ω )= tι∗τ, for some class τ H2(X, Z) and t Q. Then 1 Z ∈ ∈ (1) 5 does not divide (λ, λ). (λ,λ) (2) If 3 divides x := 2 , then div(λ) = 2, x 3 modulo 8, 8c/5 is an integer, and both 3x and 16cx 5 are perfect squares. ≡ − VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 53

(3) If 3 does not divide x := (λ,λ) , then x and 3(16cx 5) are perfect squares. If div(λ) = 1, 2 − (λ,λ) c then c/5 is an integer. If div(λ) = 2, then gcd 8, 5+ 2 5 is an integer. Proof. Assume ﬁrst that gcd(5, (λ, λ)) = 1. If div(λ) = 1, set n := 0. If div(λ) = 2, let n the n (λ,λ) k 2 (λ,λ) integer, such that 2 := gcd 8, 5+ . Then [Z]= n 5λ c (T X) , for an integer 2 2 − 6 2 c/5 if div(λ) = 1, k = by Lemmas 7.1 and 7.5. Hence, 2nc/5 if div(λ) = 2, 48k 6 6(23−nk(λ, λ) 1) = − 5 2n − 5(λ, λ) 5(λ, λ) · must be the square of the rational number t, by Equation (7.9). Equivalently, (λ, λ) 15 (23−nk(λ, λ) 1) 2 − is a perfect square. Set x := (λ,λ) . Then 15x(24−nkx 1) is a perfect square. Let p be a prime integer. If p 2 − divides x, then p does not divide (24−nkx 1). Thus, either both 3x and 5(24−nkx 1) are perfect squares, or both x and 15(24−nkx − 1) are perfect squares. Part (3) follow from− the second case. The ﬁrst case implies that n =− 3, since otherwise 5(24−nkx 1) 1 modulo 4 and it can not be a square. Hence, if 3 divides x, then div(λ) = 2, x = (λ,− λ)/2≡ −3 modulo 8, k = 8c is an integer, and both 3x and 5(2kx 1) are perfect squares. Part (2) follows.≡ 5 − Assume next that 5 divides (λ, λ). Then the primitive lagrangian class is 1 λ2 (λ,λ) c (T X) , 2n − 30 2 n (λ,λ) where n = 0, if div(λ) = 1, or 2 = gcd 8, 10 + 1 , if div(λ) = 2, by Lemma 7.5. Thus, k 2 (λ,λ) n (λ,λ) [Z]= n λ c (T X) , for the integer k = 2 c. Set x := . Then 2 − 30 2 10 48k 6 1 3(24−nkx 1) = − 25 2n − 5(λ, λ) 5 x s · r should be a rational number. Hence, 3x(24−nkx 1) is a perfect square. If a prime p divides x, then it does not divide (24−nkx 1). Hence,− either both x and 3(24−nkx 1) are perfect squares, or both 3x and 24−nkx −1 are perfect squares. If both x and 3(2−4−nkx 1) are perfect squares, then n 2, since− 3 is not a square modulo 8. Hence div(λ) = 2.− It not possible for both 3x and≥ 24−nkx 1− to be perfect squares, since in that case 3 divides x and so 24−nkx 1 1 modulo 3, which− is not a square. We conclude that x is a perfect square. Now 10x −2x ≡−modulo 8 and 10x = (λ, λ) 6 modulo 8, since div(λ) = 2. Hence x 3 or 1 modulo 8.≡ The latter contradicts the fact≡ that x is a perfect square. Thus 5 does not≡ divide− (λ, λ) and Part (1) follows. Remark 7.7. Following are two cases satisfying the arithmetic constraints above. The case (λ, λ) = 8, div(λ) either 1 or 2, c = 620 (so that χ(Z) = 3 214 312), and t = 69/2. The case (λ, λ) = 54, div(λ) = 2, c = 245/8 (so χ(Z) = 3774), and· t =· 23/3. A statement similar to Lemma 7.6 can be formulated for (λ, λ) < 0 and proven essentially with the same argument. 54 EYAL MARKMAN

Remark 7.8. Singular lagrangian ruled surfaces, which deform with a polarized holomorphic symplectic manifold (X,L) of K3[2] deformation type, are more common and their existence is proven13 in [CMP] for all but finitely many deformation types of the polarization L. 7.4. Lagrangian subvarieties with a positive LLV line may lead to new examples of IHSMs. Though rather constrained, additional examples of lagrangian surfaces satisfying the assumptions of Lemma 7.1 would be potentially interesting. Smooth lagrangian subvarieties Z of projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds X satisfying the conditions (1) H1,0(Z) does not vanish, (2) the restriction homomorphism ρ : H2(X, Z) H2(Z, Z) has rank 1, (3) the lattice orthogonal to ker(ρ) is spanned by→ an ample class λ, are interesting from the point of view of the classification of holomorphic symplectic varieties for the following reason. The ampleness of λ implies that (λ, λ) > 0 and so λ⊥ is a non-degenerate sublattice of co-rank 1 in H2(X, Z). The pair (X,Z) deforms over an open subset of the period ⊥ domain Ωλ⊥ of weight 2 Hodge structures associated to the lattice λ [Vo1]. The class λ 1,1 remains ample over an open dense subset in moduli. Note that dim(Ω ⊥ ) = h (X) 1. Let λ − M be the connected component of the moduli space of λ-stable sheaves on X containing ι∗L, ∗ where ι : Z X is the inclusion and L is a line bundle on Z with c1(L) spanQ ι λ, c1(ωZ ) . Let B be the→ irreducible component of the Hilbert scheme of X containing∈ Z.{ Then Z is} a smooth point of B and dim(B)= h1,0(Z), since the normal bundle of Z in X is isomorphic to ∗ 0 ′ ′ ′ T Z [Vo1]. A Zariski open subset M of M parametrizes pairs (Z , ι∗L ), where Z is a smooth lagrangian subvariety of X and L′ is a line bundle over Z′. M 0 is holomorphic symplectic and the support morphism π : M 0 B is projective and a lagrangian fibration, by [DM, Theorem 8.1]. Being quasi-projective, M→0 admits an ample divisor class, which restricts non-trivially to the projective fibers of π, as well as the pull back of an ample class from B. In particular, the rank of the Neron-Severi group of any compactification M¯ of M 0 is at least 2. Assume that M 0 admits a compactification M¯ , which is an irreducible symplectic variety with at worst Q-factorial terminal singularities. Then the moduli space of complex deformations of M¯ admits a surjective and generically injective period map onto the period domain ΩΛ of weight 2 pure Hodge structures on the lattice Λ := H2(M,¯ Z), by [BL]. In particular, the moduli space of M¯ has dimension h1,1(M¯ ) and the locus in moduli of M¯ , arising from varying (X,Z) via the above construction, has co-dimension L2, since such symplectic varieties with Picard rank r vary in co-dimension r in moduli. Hence,≥ the dimension of is at most h1,1(M¯ ) 2. The locus 1,1 L − is expected to have the same dimension h (X) 1asΩλ⊥ , which would imply the inequality Lh1,1(M¯ ) h1,1(X) + 1. Only one deformation type− of irreducible symplectic varieties with second Betti≥ number 24 is known, namely O’Grady’s desingularization of a 10 dimensional moduli space of sheaves≥ on a K3 surface [O3, Ra]. The latter is related to the above strategy in the papers [LSV, Vo2].

8. Effective LLV lines Let X be a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold. We say that a line ℓ in H˜ (X, Q) is eﬀective, if ℓ = ℓ(F ) for an object F in Db(X), such that F has a rank 1

13The existence of a uniruled divisor in X in the linear system of L is proven in [CMP] and a choice of a curve in the base of the ruling determines a lagrangian surface. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 55 cohomological obstruction map (Definition 6.11). We say that a line ℓ in H˜ (X, Q) is potentially effective, if there exists a projective irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold Y and a derived parallel transport operator φ˜ : H˜ (X, Q) H˜ (Y, Q), such that φ˜(ℓ) is effective. Clearly, if ℓ is potentially effective, then so is every line→ in the orbit of ℓ under the derived monodromy group. Theorem 3.4 makes the following plausible. Conjecture 8.1. A line ℓ in H˜ (X, Q) is effective, if it is potentially effective and is contained in H˜ 0,0(X, Q). Assume that X is of K3[2]-type. Choose a class δ H2(X, Z) of divisibility 2 satisfying (δ, δ)= 2. Set B := exp(e ), for λ H2(X, Q). Set ∈ − λ λ ∈ (8.1) Λ := B (Zα + H2(X, Z)+ Zβ) H˜ (X, Q). X −δ/2 ⊂ The subgroup ΛX of H˜ (X, Q) is independent of the choice of δ. We refer to ΛX as the integral LLV lattice, since it is invariant under the derived monodromy group of X, by [Ta, Theorem 9.8]. Remark 8.2. Assume that X is of K3[n]-type. Choose a primitive class δ H2(X, Z) of divisibility 2n 2 satisfying (δ, δ) = 2 2n. Define Λ as in Equation (8.1). ∈ − − X (1) Let us show that the lattice ΛX depends only on the Mon(X)-orbit of δ. Notice that B (H2(X, Z) + Zβ) = H2(X, Z) + Zβ and B (α) = α δ/2 + 1−n β. Given −δ/2 −δ/2 − 4 g O(H2(X, Z)) we get that B (α) B (α) = (δ g(δ))/2. It suffices to ∈ −g(δ)/2 − −δ/2 − show that the latter difference belongs to H2(X, Z). Indeed, the discriminant group H2(X, Z)∗/H2(X, Z) is cyclic generated by δ/(2n 2) and the coset δ/2+ H2(X, Z) is invariant under Mon(X), as the monodromy action− on H2(X, Z) factors through a (surjective) homomorphism onto the subgroup of O+(H2(X, Z)) of elements acting on the discriminant group by 1, by [Ma2, Theorem 1.2 and Lemma 4.2]. ± (2) The lattice ΛX is invariant under Mon(X), by part (1). Indeed, we have the equalities −1 2 g B−δ/2 = (g B−δ/2 g ) g = B−g(δ)/2 g, which takes Zα H (X, Z) Zβ to ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ [n] ◦ ⊕ ⊕ ΛX if g Mon(X). When X = S , for some K3-surface S, then ΛX is DMon(S)- ∈ [n] invariant, by Theorem 12.2, as well as with respect to the auto-equivalence Φχ which is the BKR-conjugate of tensorization with the sign character of Sn (Lemma 12.1). [n] Hence, ΛX is invariant by the subgroup of DMon(S ) generated by these three types of elements. [2] Assume that X is of K3 -type. A rank 1 sublattice of ΛX determines a unique orbit of primitive elements in ΛX for the action of the derived monodromy group DMon(X).

Question 8.3. Which primitive elements of ΛX span potentially effective lines in H˜ (X, Q)? As is well known, the positive cone + := x H˜ (X, R) : (x,x) > 0 is homotopic to the C { ∈ } + 3-sphere (see for example [Ma3, Sec. 4]). DMon(X) contains the index 2 subgroup O (ΛX ) of O(Λ ) acting trivially on H3( +, Z), by [Ta, Theorem 9.8]. It follows that the self intersection X C (x,x) and the divisibility of a class x ΛX determine the DMon(X)-orbit of x, by [GHS, Cor. 3.7]. ∈ We have seen that the primitive isotropic element β of divisibility 1 is effective, by Example 6.16. The element 0α + λ + 0β is potentially effective, for every primitive isotropic class λ ∈ 56 EYAL MARKMAN

H2(X, Z), by Example 3.11(1). The latter two examples represent the same DMon(X)-orbit, since every primitive isotropic class in ΛX has divisibility 1 (see for Example [Ma5, Lemma 2.5]). 5 The primitive element 2α+ 2 β of self intersection 10 and divisibility 2 is effective, by Example − 2 6.17 of the trivial line bundle X . The class λ + 3β is potentially effective, for λ H (X, Z) primitive of divisibility 2 withO (λ, λ)= 10, by Example 7.4 of a lagrangian P2. The∈ latter two examples represent the same DMon(X−)-orbit. The class λ 3β, for λ H2(X, Z) primitive of divisibility 2 with (λ, λ) = 6 is potentially effective, by Example− 7.4 of∈ the lagrangian Fano variety of lines on a cubic threefold and Lemma 7.3. So is the class λ 3β, for λ H2(X, Z) primitive of divisibility 1 with (λ, λ) = 2, by Example 7.4 of the lagrangian− fixed∈ locus of an anti-symplectic involution and Lemma 7.3. Reference [CMP] may lead to more effective classes associated to singular lagrangian surfaces (see Remark 7.8).

9. The Chern character of a modular vector bundle isomorphic to Φ( [2] ) OK3 We calculate the Chern character of a modular vector bundle obtained from the structure sheaf of X of K3[2]-type via equivalences of derived categories and deformations. The higher Chern classes of F are determined by its rank and ﬁrst Chern class and the values of the latter two are constrained. [2] Let X be of K3 -type. Let ΛX be its integral LLV lattice and let B−δ/2 be the isometry of H˜ (X, Q) both given in (8.1). We have

1 1 (9.1) B (α) = α δ β, −δ/2 − 2 − 4 (λ, δ) B (λ) = λ β, λ H2(X, Q), and −δ/2 − 2 ∀ ∈ B−δ/2(β) = β.

Note the equality

2 2 (9.2) B−δ/2(H (X, Z)+ Zβ)= H (X, Z)+ Zβ.

Lemma 9.1. Let F be a vector bundle over X which is obtained via a sequence of equivalences [2] of derived categories and deformations from the structure sheaf Y , where Y is of K3 -type as well. Then rank(F ) = r2, for some integer r . Set h := c (FO). Then h = r0 η for an 0 0 1 gcd(r0,2) integral class η H1,1(X, Z). The class η satisﬁes ∈ (9.3) r (5 + 2(η, η)) if r is odd, 0 | 0 (η, η) (9.4) r 5+ if r is even. 0 | 2 0 1 2 Furthermore, Ψ(v(F )) = 8 (γ + 10˜q), where

5r2 + 2(h, h) (9.5) γ = 2r α + 2h/r + 0 β 0 0 2r3 0 VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 57 is a primitive class of divisibility 2 in the lattice Λ satisfying (γ, γ)= 10. Consequently, X − 2 2 h 1 r0 ch2(F ) = 2 + − c2(X), 2r0 24 3 2 h (1 r0) ch3(F ) = 4 + − 2 hc2(X) 6r0 24r0 2 2 2 2 4 6 4(h, h) r0 + 20(1 r0)(h, h) + 25r0 46r0 + 21r0 ch4(F ) = − 4 − [pt]. 32r0 Proof. Let Λ be the integral LLV lattice of Y , given in (8.1). The line ℓ( ) is spanned by Y OY the class 4α + 5β, by Example 6.17. We have (4α + 5β)= B−δ/2(4α + 2δ + 4β) and 2α + δ + 2β 2 5 is a primitive class in Zα + H (X, Z)+ Zβ of divisibility 2. Then γ0 := 2α + 2 β is a primitive class of divisibility 2 in ΛY satisfying (γ0, γ0) = 10. Let H(φ) : ΛY ΛX be the integral isometry associated to a derived parallel transport− operator φ : H∗(Y, Q)→ H∗(X, Q), which is → induced by a sequence of equivalences of derived categories ande deformations used to obtain F from Y (see Theorem 5.3). Set γ := (H(φ))(γ0). Then γ is a primitive class of divisibility 2 in O 2 ΛX satisfying (γ, γ)= 10, since φ is an isometry. Note that H (X, Z) is contained in ΛX and 2 − 2 δ the component in H (X, Q) of a class ine ΛX belongs to H (X, Z)+ Z 2 , by Equations (9.1) and (9.2). Write γ = rα + λ + sβ, with r, s Q and λ H2(X, Z)+ Z δ . Then r = (γ, β) ∈ ∈ 2 − is an even integer by the divisibility of γ. Set r := r/2. Furthermore, s belongs to 1 Z, since 0 2 (γ,B (α)) = (γ, α δ/2 β/4) = s + r0 (λ, δ/2) is an even integer and (λ, δ/2) belongs −δ/2 − − − 2 − to 1 Z. We have v(F )= φ(v( )) and the equality 2 OY 1 1 (9.6) ǫ(H(φ))Ψ(v(F )) = (γ2 + 10˜q)= r2α2 + λ2 + s2β2 + 2rλα + 2rsαβ + 2sλβ + 10˜q , 8 8 by Equatione (6.24) and Theorem 5.3. The coefficient of α2 in Ψ(v(F )) is rank(F )/2 and the 2 2 2 coefficient of α in the right hand side is r /8, so ǫ(H(φ)) = 1 (by Remark 5.4) and rank(F )= r0. 2 2 Let h = c1(F ). Note that Ψ(h)=Ψ(eh(1)) = eh(α /2) = hα. The coefficient in H (X, Q) of α in the left hand side of (9.6) is h and the coefficiente on the right hand side is (r0/2)λ. Hence, 2 4(h,h) 5 (h,h) 5r0+2(h,h) h = (r0/2)λ. We have 10 = (γ, γ)= 4r0s + 2 . So s = 2r + 3 = 3 , and − − r0 0 r0 2r0 2 2 5r0 + 2(h, h) γ = 2r0α + h + 3 β, r0 2r0 verifying Equation (9.5). The above displayed formula yields 2 5r2 + 2(h, h) r4 (h, δ) γ = B 2r α + h + r δ + 0 − 0 + β . −δ/2 0 r 0 2r3 r 0 0 0 We see that 2 h is an integral class. Hence, (h,δ) is an integer, since δ has divisibility 2, and so r0 r0 3 2 4 2r0 divides 5r0 + 2(h, h) r0. − 2 3 2 If r0 is odd, then h = r0η, for η H (X, Z), and r0 divides r0(5 + 2(η, η)), so Equation (9.3) ∈ 2 3 2 holds. If r0 is even, then h = (r0/2)η, for η H (X, Z), and r0 divides r0(5 + (η, η)/2), so Equation (9.4) holds. ∈ 58 EYAL MARKMAN

2 2 5 Let us ﬁrst calculate κ(F ) = exp( h/r )(ch(F )). Set κ(γ) := exp( h/r )(γ) = 2r0α + β. − 0 − 0 2r0 Equation (9.6) yields the ﬁrst equality below

2 (6.25) 2 2 25 2 46 ˜ 8Ψ(κ(F ) tdX )= κ(γ) + 10˜q = 4r0α + 2 β + (bX + αβ). 4r0 5 p 2 46 25 46 1 Hence, 8κ(F )√tdX = 8r0 + bX + 2 [pt], by Equation (6.22), and using bX = c2(X), 5 4r0 5 3 established in Equation (6.21), we get

−1 2 1 25 κ(F ) = ( tdX ) r0 + c2(X)+ 2 [pt] . 24 32r0 p Now, (√td )−1 = 1 1 c (X)+ 21 [pt] and we get X − 24 2 32 1 r2 1 25 (9.7) κ(F )= r2 + − 0 c (X)+ 21r2 + 46 [pt]. 0 24 2 32 0 r2 − 0 h h2 h3 h4 4 2 2 Multiplying both sides by 1 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 4 and using h = 3(h, h) and c2(X)h = r0 2r0 6r0 24r0 X 30(h, h) we get R h2 1 r2 h3 (1 r2) ch(F ) = r2 + h + + − 0 c (X) + + − 0 hc (X) + 0 2r2 24 2 6r4 24r2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 6 4(h, h) r0 + 20(1 r0)(h, h) + 25r0 46r0 + 21r0 − 4 − [pt]. 32r0

Remark 9.2. The determination of the Chern character of F in Lemma 9.1 in terms of rank(F ) and c1(F ) agrees with O’Grady’s [O2, Prop. 5.8]. Example 9.3. Let S be a K3 surface and X = S[n]. Let F be the vector bundle corresponding i via the BKR equivalence to G ⊠ G ⊠ ⊠ G C χ , for a rigid slope-stable vector bundle G on S. If n = 2, Lemma 9.1 applies to the· · vector · ⊗ bundle F , by Remark 1.5. We use Lemma 9.1 to show that ℓ(F ) is spanned by

2 2 r0(r0−1) (c1(G),c1(G))+2 r0 r0(r0−1) r0α + r0c1(G) 2 + 2 + 4 2 β if i = 0, − 2 −  r2α + r c (G) r0(r0+1) + h (c1(G),c1(G))+2 + r0 r0(r0+1) i β if i = 1.  0 0 1 − 2 2 4 − 2 h i We start with comments for all n, which will be used in the following Remark 9.4 to calculate ℓ(F ) for all n. The line ℓ(F ) is invariant under the action of the stabilizer of ℓ(G) in the isometry group of the sublattice H˜ (S, Q) of H˜ (S[n], Q), where the isometry group of the former is embedded as a subgroup of the isometry group of the latter via the homomorphism h making the diagram below commutative.

DMon(S) / DMon(S[n])

h O(H˜ (S, Q)) / O(H˜ (S[n], Q)), VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 59

[n] [n] [n] The top horizontal arrow above is : HomK3[1] (S,S) HomK3[n] (S ,S ) induced by the functor (5.3). The homomorphism h is given by h(g) =→ det(g) (B ι(g) B ), where · −δ/2 ◦ ◦ δ/2 ι(g) is the extension acting trivially on span δ (see Example 2.1), and B is exp(e ), by [Ta, { } λ λ Theorem 9.4] when n = 2 and by Theorem 1.9 for general n. It follows that Bδ/2(ℓ(F )) is a line in the plane spanned by ℓ(G) and δ. (9.8) B (ℓ(F )) ℓ(G)+ Qδ. δ/2 ⊂ n n−1 Now, if the rank of G is r0, then the rank r of F is r0 and c1(F ) = r0 c1(G)+ tδ, under the inclusion H2(S, Z) H2(S[n], Z) given in (3.10), where t is an integer depending on the exponent i 0, 1 of χ⊂and δ is half the class of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes. The ∈ { } n line ℓ(F ) is spanned by a vector of the form r0 α + c1(F )+ s(F )β, for some s(F ) Q, by Theorem 6.13(3). ∈ 2 r0 2 Assume n = 2. The coeﬃcient s(F ) t 4 of β in Bδ/2(r0α + c1(F )+ s(F )β) must be equal − − 2 r0 (λ,λ)+2 r0 s(G), by (9.8), yielding s(F )= r0 s(G)+ + t. Set λ := c1(G). Then s(G)= and · · 4 2r0 (λ, λ) + 2 r2 s(F )= + 0 + t. 2 4

On the other hand, multiplying the coeﬃcient of β in (9.5) by r0/2 we get that 2 2 2 2 5r0 + 2(c1(F ), c1(F )) 5r0 + 2r0(λ, λ) 4t s(F )= 2 = 2 − . 4r0 4r0

4 2 2 2 r0 −r0 Comparing the above two expressions for s(F ) we get that t + r0t + 4 = 0, so that r (r 1) r (r + 1) t 0 0 − , 0 0 . ∈ − 2 − 2 O’Grady calculated in [O2, Prop. 5.8] that t = r0(r0 1)/2 if i = 0 and t = r0(r0 + 1)/2 if i = 1 as follows. Using the notation of (4.5) we− have the− short exact sequence− over Γ

χi+1 ∗ ∗ ⊠ ⊠ 0 q F b (G G) (G G)| 0, → → → Dˆ → h i where Dˆ Γ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up b :Γ S S centered along the diagonal. ∗ ⊂ ∗ ∗ → × Now q (δ) = [E], c1(b (G ⊠ G)) = r0q (λ), and so

χi+1 ⊠ r0(r0 1)/2 if i = 0, (9.9) t = rank (G G)| = − − Dˆ r0(r0 + 1)/2 if i = 1. h i O’Grady denotes F by G[2]+, if i = 0, and by G[2]−, if i = 1. Note that G[2]− is isomorphic to ∗ + ∗ − (G [2] ) S[2] ( δ), by Lemma 13.4. Indeed, the above description of ℓ(G[2] ) agrees with ⊗∗ O + ∗− that of ℓ((G [2] ) [2] ( δ)) via Lemma 6.15. ⊗ OS − Remark 9.4. The argument of Example 9.3 generalizes to calculate ℓ(F ) for the vector bundle i F corresponding via the BKR equivalence to G ⊠ G ⊠ ⊠ G C χ , for a rigid slope-stable · · · n−⊗1 vector bundle G on a K3 surface S, for all n. Again c1(F )= r0 c1(G)+ tδ and the coeﬃcient 60 EYAL MARKMAN

1−n rn +(1 n)t+s(F ) of β in the image B (rnα+c (F )+s(F )β) must be equal to rn−1s(G)= 4 0 − δ/2 0 1 0 n−2 (c1(G),c1(G))+2 r0 2 , by (9.8). We get that (c (G), c (G)) + 2 n 1 s(F )= rn−2 1 1 + rn − + (n 1)t. 0 2 0 4 − It remains to calculate t. The quotient Γ/An of Γ by the alternating group is a double cover of S[n] branched over the divisor of non-reduced subschemes q q Γ 1 Γ/A 2 S[n]. −→ n −→ We have the short exact sequence over Γ/An 0 q∗F (q (b∗(G ⊠ ⊠ G)))An Q 0. → 2 → 1,∗ · · · → → The quotient sheaf Q is again supported over the inverse image of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes in S[n]. Away from the locus of co-dimension 2, where more then two points come n−2 together, Q is locally free of rank r0 times the right hand side of (9.9). We conclude that rn−1(r 1)/2 if i = 0, t = 0 0 − − rn−1(r + 1)/2 if i = 1. 0 0

10. Modular vector bundles isomorphic to Φ( [n] ) OK3 We prove Theorem 1.4 in this section. Proposition 10.1. Let X , 1 i n, be compact complex manifolds with trivial Picard groups i ≤ ≤ and let Vi be a θi-twisted vector bundle over Xi or rank ri. Assume that Vi does not have any non-zero subsheaf of rank less than ri. Then the vector bundle V1 ⊠ V2 ⊠ ⊠ Vn does not have n · · · any non-zero subsheaf of rank less than i=1 ri. The proof of the proposition will use theQ following lemma. Lemma 10.2. Let X be a connected compact Kähler manifold with a trivial Picard group. Let V be a possibly twisted rank r vector bundle over X. Assume that V does not have any non-zero subsheaf of rank less than r. Let U be a vector space and E U C V a saturated non-zero ⊂ ⊗ subsheaf. Then there exists a subspace W U, such that E = W C V . ⊂ ⊗ Proof. The vector bundle V is slope-stable with respect to every Kähler class on X. The determinant of Hom(E,U C V ) is trivial, since Pic(X) is trivial. The statement is thus a special case of the the more⊗ general fact that saturated subsheaves of polystable sheaves of the same slope are direct summands. Proof. (of Proposition 10.1). The proof is by induction on n. The case n = 1 is clear. Assume that n > 1 and the statement holds for n 1. Let E be a non-zero saturated subsheaf of − V := V1 ⊠ ⊠ Vn. Denote the rank of E by e. There exists an open subset U of Xn, such that the restriction· · · of E to ( n−1 X ) p maps to a non-zero subsheaf E of rank e of the i=1 i × { } p restriction Vp of V , for all p U. Then there exists a subspace Wp of the fiber Vn,p of Vn at p, ∈Q n−1 such that the saturation of E in V is V ⊠ ⊠ V C W and e = dim(W ) r , by the p p 1 · · · n−1 ⊗ p p i=1 i induction hypothesis and Lemma 10.2. We conclude that there is a rank e/ n−1 r subsheaf Qi=1 i W of Vp, such that E is a subsheaf of V1 ⊠ ⊠ Vn−1 ⊠ W . But the saturation of W must be · · · Q VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 61 equal to Vn, as Vn does not have non-zero saturated subsheaves. Hence, E must be equal to V .

Proof. (of Theorem 1.4). Being H-slope-stable, G is projectively H-hyperholomorphic [Ve5] (see also [HSc]). Hence, the triple (S,H,G) determines a twistor family π : P1 and a possibly twisted vector bundle over , such that each fiber S of π over t SP1 →is endowed G S t ∈ with a Kähler class ωt and the restriction Gt of to St is ωt-slope-stable. We may assume, possibly after replacing H by another ample classG with respect to which G is slope-stable, that 1 Pic(St) is trivial, for a generic t P . Then Gt does not have any non-zero saturated proper ∈ n subsheaves. Thus, the vector bundle Gt ⊠ ⊠ Gt over (St) does not have any non-zero saturated proper subsheaves, by Proposition· 10.1. · · The isospectral Hilbert scheme Γ Sn S[n] is the reduced fiber product of Sn and S[n] over the symmetric product S(n), by⊂ [Hai,× Def. 3.2.4]. Hence, we have a relative isospectral n [n] n subscheme over the base of the twistor deformation with fiber Γt St St . Let bt :Γt S [n] ⊂ × 2 → and qt :Γt St be the restriction of the two projections. The Brauer class αt Han(St, S ) → 2 ∈ O of Gt is the image of a classα ˜t H (St,µr), where r is the rank of Gt, as pointed out in ∈ ⊠n ⊠ ⊠ Equation (3.5). The Brauer class αt of Gt Gt is thus the image of an Sn-invariant 2 n · · · 2 (n) class in H (St ,µr), which is the pullback of a class in H (St ,µr). Hence, the Brauer class ∗ ⊠n ∗ ⊠ ⊠ 2 [n] bt (αt ) of bt (Gt Gt) is the pullback via qt of a class in Han(St , [n] ). The morphism · · · OSt ∗ ⊠ ⊠ qt is flat, by the proof of [Hai, Prop. 3.7.4 ]. The pushforward qt,∗bt (Gt Gt) is thus a well defined locally free twisted sheaf. Set · · ·

G[n] := (q b∗(G ⊠ ⊠ G ))Sn . t t,∗ t t · · · t [n] [n] A non-zero proper saturated subsheaf E of Gt over the Douady space St determines an Sn-invariant non-zero subsheaf E˜ of Gt ⊠ ⊠ Gt of the same rank as E, since qt restricts to a · · · [n] Galois covering over the complement of the divisor in St of non-reduced subschemes. We have ˜ [n] seen that such a subsheaf E does not exist. Hence, the vector bundle Gt does not have any [n] non-zero saturated proper subsheaves. Thus, Gt is slope-stable with respect to every Kähler [n] class on St . The paragraph before the statement of Theorem 1.4 establishes that obsG[n] has rank 1. Hence, the class κ(G[n]) remains of Hodge type under every Kähler deformation of S[n], by Proposition 3.3 (applied with Φ the identity endofunctor). The same thus holds for the class [n] [n] [n] κ(Gt ). We conclude that Gt deforms with St to a pair (X, F ) of a vector bundle F over [n] every Kähler deformation X of St , by [Ma4, Prop. 6.17] (applied via an argument identical to the one used in the proof of Theorem 3.4). j The vector space Ext (Gt, Gt) is one dimensional, for j = 0 and j = 2, and it vanishes j [n] [n] otherwise. Hence, the vector space Ext ((G , ρ⊠), (G , ρ⊠)) is one dimensional, for j = 2i, Sn t t j [n] [n] 0 i n, and it vanishes otherwise. We conclude that Ext (Gt , Gt ) is one dimensional, for j ≤= 2i≤, 0 i n, and it vanishes otherwise, since BKR is an equivalence of categories. Now j [n] ≤ [n≤] j [n] [n] [n] Ext (Gt , Gt ) is isomorphic to H (St , nd(Gt )) and nd(Gt ) is a poly-stable hyperholomorphic vector bundle. The dimensions ofE sheaf cohomologieE s of poly-stable hyperholomorphic 62 EYAL MARKMAN vector bundles are constant along twistor deformations, by [Ve4, Cor. 8.1]. Hence, the de- [n] Pn i i Pn C formations of Gt remain -objects in the sense that Ext (F, F ) ∼= H ( , ). In particular, Ext1(F, F ) vanishes and F is infinitesimally rigid.

11. Modular vector bundles with isotropic Mukai vector over Hilbert schemes In Section 11.1 we compute the Chern character of a vector bundle on an irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of K3[n]-type, which is the Fourier-Mukai image of a sky-scraper sheaf. The Chern character is determined by the rank and first Chern class of F . Let S be a K3 surface. In Section 11.2 we prove Theorem 1.6 about the modularity of the BKR images on S[n] of equivariant vector bundles on Sn constructed from n vector bundles G n on S, where { i}i=1 all Gi belong to the same two dimensional component of the moduli space of stable sheaves on S. 11.1. The Chern character of the Fourier-Mukai image of a sky-scraper sheaf. Let Φ : Db(S ) Db(S) be an equivalence of derived categories of K3 surfaces. Assume that for 0 → every point p S0, the image Φ( p) of the sky-scraper sheaf of p is isomorphic to a vector ∈ O n bundle of Mukai vector v on S. Let pi i=1 be a set of n distinct points on S0 and denote by G the vector bundle isomorphic to{ Φ(} ). Let Z S be the length n zero dimensional i Opi ⊂ 0 subscheme of S with support p n . Denote by z the corresponding point of S[n]. Note that 0 { i}i=1 0 the object ⊠ ⊠ is isomorphic in Db(Sn) to the sky scraper sheaf . Opσ(1) · · · Opσ(n) 0 O(pσ(1),...,pσ(n)) The “usual” BKR equivalence is given by the functor (11.1) bkr := Φ : Db(S[n]) Db (Sn) OΓ,ρ → Sn using the same object as in (4.4) as Fourier-Mukai kernel, but going in the reverse direction. We see that the sky-scraper sheaf corresponds via bkr to the S -equivariant object Oz n S ⊠ ⊠ ⊕σ∈ n Opσ(1) · · · Opσ(n) ⊠ h i over Sn. The equivalence Φ n : Db (Sn) Db (Sn) takes the above displayed object to 0 Sn 0 → Sn (11.2) G := S G ⊠ ⊠ G z ⊕σ∈ n σ(1) · · · σ(n) with its natural S -linearization. Let Φ˜ [n] :Db(S[n]) Db(S[n]) be the composition n 0 → ⊠ Φ˜ [n] := BKR Φ n bkr, ◦ ◦ [n] where BKR is given in (4.4). Let Fz be the sheaf over S isomorphic to BKR(Gz). Then Fz [n] 2 [n] is isomorphic to Φ˜ ( z) and hence Σ(Fz) has codimension one in HT (S ). Fz is locally free n O of rank n!r0 , where r0 is the rank of the Mukai vector v. Let Y S be a length n subscheme supported on n distinct points y ,...,y . Let y S[n] ⊂ { 1 n} ∈ be the point representing Y . Let Gi,yj be the fiber of Gi over yj. The fiber Fz,y of Fz over y is

Fz,y = Gσ(1),yτ(1) Gσ(n),yτ(n) . ⊗ ··· ⊗ ! τM∈Sn σM∈Sn

The Sn-linearization of Gz identifies the fiber Gσ(1),y1 Gσ(n),yn over (y1,...,yn) of the direct summand of G corresponding to σ with the fiber⊗···⊗G G over z σ(τ(1)),yτ(1) ⊗···⊗ σ(τ(n)),yτ(n) VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 63

(yτ(1),...,yτ(n)) of the direct summand corresponding to σ τ by permutation of the factors, for all σ, τ S . Hence, ◦ ∈ n Sn

F = G −1 G −1 z,y ∼ σ(τ (1)),y1 ⊗ ··· ⊗ σ(τ (n)),yn τ∈S σ∈S ! Mn Mn Sn γ=σ◦τ −1 = G G . ∼  γ(1),y1 ⊗ ··· ⊗ γ(n),yn  τ∈S γ∈S Mn Mn   and the fiber F is naturally isomorphic to S G G . z,y ⊕γ∈ n γ(1),y1 ⊗ ··· ⊗ γ(n),yn A relative version of the construction over S[n] produces a vector bundle F over S[n] S[n], 0 0 × ⊠ ˜ [n] b [n] [n] which is the image of the structure sheaf ∆ [n] of the diagonal via 1 Φ : D (S0 S0 ) S O 0 × → Dn(S[n] S[n]) and F is the restriction of F to z S[n]. 0 × z { }× Lemma 11.1. Let X be of K3[n]-type. Let F be a vector bundle over X which is obtained via a sequence of equivalences of derived categories and deformations from a sky scraper sheaf z, [n] ∗ O z Y , where Y is of K3 -type as well. Then v(F ) belongs to SH (X, Q). Set h := c1(F ). ∈ n n The rank of F is equal n!r0 , for some rational number r0, and Ψ(v(F )) = γ , where h (h, h) (11.3) γ = r α + + β 0 n−1 2 2n−1 n!r0 2(n!) r0 is an isotropic class. In particular, ℓ(F ) = span γ . Q{ } Proof. Let φ : H∗(Y, Q) H∗(X, Q) be the derived parallel transport operator associated to the sequence of derived equivalences→ and deformations used to obtain F from the sky scraper sheaf. Let H(φ) : H˜ (Y, Q) H˜ (X, Q) be the image of φ via the functor (5.1). Then v(F ) = φ(v( )) = φ([pt]), the class→ [pt] belongs to SH∗(Y, Q), and φ restricts to an isomorphism from Oz SH∗(Y, Q) ontoe SH∗(Y, Q), by [Ta, Theorem B]. Hence, v(F ) belongs to SH∗(Y, Q). n n Set γ := (H(φ))(β). Then Ψ(v(F )) = ǫ(H(φ))γ , by the equality Ψ(v( z)) = β of Example 6.16 and the equivariance of Ψ with respect to derived parallel transportO operators (Theorem 5.3). When en is odd ǫ(H(φ)) = 1, by definition,e and the fact that the rank of F is positive implies that ǫ(H(φ)) = 1 also when n is even, by Remark 5.4. Write γ = r0α + λ + sβ. Then e n n n n Ψ(ev(F )) = γn = rn−kλkαn−k + sk(r α + λ)n−kβk. k 0 k 0 Xk=0 Xk=1 n n The coefficient of α on the left hand side is rank(F )/n! and on the right hand side it is r0 , so n 2 n−1 rank(F )= n!r0 . The coefficient in H (X, Q) of α on the left hand side is h/(n 1)!, since n n−1 n−1 − n−1 Ψ(h)= eh(α /n!) = hα /(n 1)!, and on the right hand side it is nr0 λ, so λ = h/(n!r0 ). We have − (h, h) 0 = (γ, γ)= λ2 2r s = 2r s. 0 2 2n−2 0 − (n!) r0 − (h,h) We get that s = 2 2n−1 and Equation (11.3) is verified. 2(n!) r0 64 EYAL MARKMAN

Lemma 11.2. Keep the notation and hypotheses of Lemma 11.1 and assume that n = 2. Then h (h,h) γ = r0α + + 3 β is a primitive isotropic class of divisibility 1 in the LLV lattice ΛX given 2r0 8r0 2 in (8.1). In particular, r0 is an integer, h = r0ψ, for a class ψ H (X, Z) of divisibility 2, (ψ,ψ) ∈ such that 2 divides div(ψ), 2r0 divides (ψ, ψ), and r0 (mod 4). Furthermore, 2r0 ≡ 2 1 2 r0 ch2(F ) = 2 h c2(X) 4r0 − 12 1 3 1 ch3(F ) = 4 h c2(X)h 24r0 − 24 (h, h)2 5(h, h) 21r2 ch (F ) = + 0 [pt]. 4 26r6 − 16r2 16 0 0 n h (h,h) Proof. We have Ψ(v(F )) = γ , where γ = (H(φ))(β)= r0α + + 3 β, by Lemma 11.1. We 2r0 8r0 get that 1 er (h, h) (h, δ) r γ = B r α + h + 0 δ + + 0 β . −δ/2 0 2r 2 8r3 4r − 4 0 0 0 1 r0 2 Hence, r0 is an integer, η = h + δ is a class in H (X, Z), and h = r0(2η r0δ). Set 2r0 2 − ψ := 2η r0δ. Then 2 divides div(ψ). Furthermore, the coeﬃcient of β in the above displayed formula− is an integer equal to (h, h) (h, δ) r r2[4(η, η) 4r (η, δ) 2r2] 2r [(η, δ)+ r ] r (η, η) + 0 = 0 − 0 − 0 + 0 0 0 = . 8r3 4r − 4 8r3 4r − 4 2r 0 0 0 0 0 Hence, 2r divides (η, η). Now, (ψ, ψ) = 4(η, η) 2r2 and so 2r divides (ψ, ψ). We have 0 − 0 0 (ψ, ψ) (η, η) = 4 r0, 2r0 2r0 − (ψ,ψ) hence, r0 (mod 4). 2r0 ≡ We have Ψ(h)= hα, Ψ(h2)= h2 + (h, h)αβ, and Ψ(h3) = 3(h, h)hβ. Hence,

1 (h, h) (h, h) (h, h) 2 γ2 = r2α2 + hα + h2 + αβ + hβ + β2 0 4r2 4r2 8r4 8r3 0 0 0 0 1 1 (h, h)2 = Ψ 2r2 + h + h2 + h3 + [pt] = Ψ(v(F )). 0 4r2 24r4 26r6 0 0 0 2 Using c2(X)h = 30(h, h)[pt] we get 1 1 (h, h)2 1 21 ch(F ) = v(F )( td )−1 = 2r2 + h + h2 + h3 + [pt] (1 c (X)+ [pt]) X 0 4r2 24r4 26r6 − 24 2 32 0 0 0 p 1 r2 1 1 (h, h)2 5(h, h) 21r2 = 2r2 + h + h2 0 c (X) + h3 c (X)h + + 0 [pt] 0 4r2 − 12 2 24r4 − 24 2 26r6 − 16r2 16 0 0 0 0 VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 65

11.2. Proof of Theorem 1.6. The following will be needed for the proof of Theorem 1.6. Lemma 11.3. Let X be a connected compact K¨ahler manifold with a trivial Picard group. Let V , 1 i n, be vector bundles, possibly twisted, but if so then with respect to the same i ≤ ≤ Brauer class. Assume that Vi does not have any non-zero saturated proper subsheaf, 1 i n. Assume that V and V are not isomorphic, if i = j. Let S act on Xn by permuting the≤ factors.≤ i j 6 n Choose the linearization ρ of W := S V ⊠ ⊠V permuting the factors of each direct ⊕σ∈ n σ(1) · · · σ(n) summand. Then W does not have any Sn-invariant non-zero saturated proper subsheaf. Proof. The direct summands of W are stable, by Proposition 10.1, are pairwise non-isomorphic, and W is polystable with respect to every K¨ahler class on Xn. Let E be a saturated subsheaf of W . Then det( om(E,W )) is the trivial line bundle, since Pic(Xn) is trivial. Hence, E is H a direct sum of a subset of the direct summands of W . If E is Sn-invariant, then this subset must be the whole of Sn and so E = W .

Proof. (of Theorem 1.6). Being H-slope-stable, each Gi is projectively H-hyperholomorphic [Ve5] (see also [HSc]). The proof is the same as that of Theorem 1.4, except that one replaces the use of Proposition 10.1 by that of Lemma 11.3 and the reference to the paragraph before Theorem 1.4 by that before Theorem 1.6.

12. The action of the derived monodromy group of S on the LLV lattice of S[n] We prove in this section Theorem 1.9 describing the composite homomorphism (H [n]) : ◦ DMon(S) O(H(S[n], Q)) from the derived monodromy group of a K3 surface to the isometry group of the→ rational LLV lattice of its n-th Hilbert scheme. e [n] b [n] b [n] Let Φχ : D (Se ) D (S ) be the auto-equivalence (4.8), which is BKR-conjugate to → [n] ∗ [n] ∗ [n] tensorization by the sign character χ. Let φχ : H (S , Q) H (S , Q) be the derived [n] [n] →[n] [n] monodromy operator corresponding to Φχ . Let H(φχ ) : H(S , Q) H(S , Q) be the [n] 2 1,1 [n] → induced isometry via (5.2). Clearly, (H(φχ )) = id. Let δ H (S , Z) be half the class of ∈ the divisor of non-reduced subschemes. Denote by (r,e λ, s) the elemente rα+λ+esβ of H(S[n], Q) e (12.1) (r, λ, s) := rα + λ + sβ. e [n] n+1 Lemma 12.1. The isometry H(φχ ) is ( 1) times the reﬂection with respect to the hyperplane orthogonal to u := (0,δ,n 1) = B− (0, δ, 0), 0 − −δ/2 e (x, u ) H(φ[n])(x) = ( 1)n+1 x + 0 u . χ − n 1 0 − Proof. Let e :Γ Sn S[n]ebe the inclusion. The kernel of the functor BKR−1 is isomorphic ∨ → × ∨ to (ι∗ Γ) [2n], the derived dual (ι∗ Γ) is ι∗ωΓ[ 2n], and ωΓ is a line bundle, since Γ is a normalO Cohen-Macaulay and GorensteinO variety,− by [Hai, Theorem 3.1]. So BKR−1 has Fourier-Mukai kernel ι ω , while the functor bkr given in (11.1), has kernel ι , each with its ∗ Γ ∗OΓ natural linearization. Let p S[n] correspond to a reduced subscheme supported on the subset x , ..., x of S, x = x ∈for i = j. The restriction of ω to the S -orbit of (x , ..., x ) { 1 n} i 6 j 6 Γ n 1 n −1 is trivial. Hence, BKR (C ) = bkr(C ) = S C , ρ , for a linearization p ∼ p ∼ ⊕σ∈ n (xσ(1), ..., xσ(n)) [n] ρ, which is isomorphic to C ,χ ρ by Remark 4.1, so Φχ (C ) = C . Hence, (xσ(1), ..., xσ(2)) ⊗ p ∼ p 66 EYAL MARKMAN

[n] n [n] H(φχ ) maps the line ℓ(Cp) = spanQ (0, 0, 1) to itself, Sym (H(φχ )) maps Ψ(v(Cp)) to [n] { } [n] itself, and φχ (v(Cp)) = v(Cp). If n is even, it follows that det(H(φχ )) = 1, by the equality e n [n] [n] [n] e Sym (H(φχ )) Ψ=Ψ [det(H(φχ ))φχ ] in Theorem 5.3. If n is odd, it follows that ℓ(Cp) ◦ [n] ◦ e is an eigenline of H(φχ ) with eigenvalue 1, as the eigenvalue is 1 as well as an n-th root of e n e[n] [n] ± unity by the equality Sym (H(φχ )) Ψ=Ψ φχ in Theorem 5.3. e [n] ◦ ◦ Note that the action of H(φχ ) is independent of the complex structure of the K3 surface [n] e [n] [n] [n] S. Furthermore, H(φχ ) commutes with H(g ) : H(S , Q) H(S , Q), for every g in → DMon(S), by Equation (4.9).e Let V be the subspace of H(S[n], Q) spanned by the DMon(S) e e e [n] e [n] orbit of the line ℓ(Cp) = spanQ (0, 0, 1) . The subspace V is H(φχ )-invariant and H(φχ ) acts { } e [n] on V as the identity, if n is odd, and V is contained in either the 1 or 1 eigenspace of H(φχ ), if n is even. e − e 1 Assume that S admits an elliptic fibration π : S P and let E1,..., En be n distincte smooth → [n] fibers. The abelian variety A := E1 En embeds as a lagrangian subvariety of S . Let [n] ×···× ι : A S be the embedding. Set A˜ := S E E . We get the equivariant → ∪σ∈ n σ(1) ×···× σ(n) embedding ˜ι : A˜ Γ into the universal subscheme Γ S[n] Sn. Let b :Γ Sn and q :Γ S[n] be the restriction→ to Γ of the two projections. Then⊂A˜ is contained× in the→ open subset where→ b is an isomorphism and q is étale. Given a line bundle on S[n], then Lq∗(ι ι∗ ) = ˜ι ˜ι∗(Lq∗ ) L ∗ L ∼ ∗ L in Db (Γ). Denote the linearization of Lq∗ by λ. Then ˜ι (˜ι∗Lq∗ , ˜ι∗λ) is isomorphic to Sn L ∗ L ˜ι (˜ι∗Lq∗ ,χ ˜ι∗λ), by Remark 4.1, as the irreducible components E E are disjoint ∗ L ⊗ σ(1) ×···× σ(n) S2,∆ ∗ ∗ ∗ for different permutations σ Sn. Furthermore, Rb∗ ˜ι∗(˜ι Lq ,χ ˜ι λ) is isomorphic to S2,∆ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∈ L ⊗ χ Rb∗ ˜ι∗(˜ι Lq , ˜ι λ), since b is an equivariant morphism with respect to the isomorphism ⊗ L −1 ∗ −1 ∗ [n] ∗ ∗ Sn Sn. It follows that BKR (ι∗ι ) = χ BKR (ι∗ι ). Thus, Φχ (ι∗ι ) = ι∗ι . → L ∼ ⊗ L 2 L ∼ L Now, ℓ( A) = span (0, f, 0) , where f is the class of a fiber of π in H (S, Z) considered as the O 2 [n]{ } ∗ subspace of H (S , Z) orthogonal to δ, by Lemma 6.25. Thus, ℓ(ι∗ι ) = exp(ec1(L))(0, f, 0) = [n] L (0, f, (f, c1( ))). We see that H(φχ ) leaves invariant the lines span (0,f,s) , whenever f is an isotropic primitiveL class in H2(S, Z) and there is a complex structure{ on S such} that f is the class of a fiber of an elliptic fibratione and there exists a line bundle on S, such that s = (f, c1( )). [n] L ⊥ L We conclude that H(φχ ) acts by multiplication by 1 or 1 on W := (0, 0, 1), (0, δ, 0) . Assume that the elliptic fibration π has a section and− all its fibers{ are integral. Then} S is isomorphic to the modulie space MH (0, f, 0) of H-stable sheaves F of rank 0, c1(F ) = f, and χ(F ) = 0, for a suitable choice of a polarization H on S [Br]. Furthermore, there exists over M (0, f, 0) S a universal sheaf and Φ : Db(M (0, f, 0)) Db(S) is an equivalence [Br]. H × P P H → Choose the length n subscheme p of S to consists of the n distinct points pi of intersection of the section with the fibers E , 1 i n. The Fourier Mukai transform Φ : Db(S) = i ≤ ≤ P ∼ Db(M (0, f, 0)) Db(S) satisfies Φ[n](C ) . Hence, Φ[n](C ) ι . We conclude H P pi ∼= Ei P p ∼= ∗ A that W is contained→ in V . O O Note that V contains the LLV line of the vector bundle (11.2). The latter line is not contained in W , by Lemma 11.2. Hence, the co-dimension of V in H˜ (S[n], Q) is at most 1. Recall that [n] ℓ( [n] ) = span (4, 0,n+3) , by Lemma 6.18. Equation (4.10) implies that H(φχ ) interchanges OS { } the two lines ℓ( [n] ) and ℓ( [n] ( δ)) = span (4, 4δ, 7 3n) . Hence, V is a co-dimension 1 OS OS − { − − } e VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 67

[n] [n] [n] subspace of H˜ (S , Q). Furthermore, H(φχ ) is neither id, nor id. Hence, H(φχ ) is either the reflection R in V or R . The reflection R must map (4, 0,n−+3) to (4, 4δ, 7 3n), as the V − V V ± − − two have the same self-intersection. Furthermore,e (4, 0,n +3)+ RV ((4, 0,n +e 3)) belongs to V . If RV ((4, 0,n+3)) = (4, 4δ, 7 3n), then (4, 0,n+3)+RV ((4, 0,n+3)) = 4(0,δ,n 1) and so V = (0, 0, 1)⊥. This contradicts− − the− fact that V contains LLV lines of vector bundles− of positive ⊥ rank as in Lemma 11.2. Hence, RV ((4, 0,n + 3)) = (4, 4δ, 7 3n), and V = (0,δ,n 1) , 1 − − − since (0,δ,n 1) = 4 [(4, 0,n + 3) RV ((4, 0,n + 3))]. When n is even we observed above that [n] − [n] − [n] det(H(φχ )) = 1 and so H(φχ )= RV . When n is odd we observed above that H(φχ ) maps [n] − (0, 0, 1) to itself, and so H(φχ )= RV . e e e Let v = (1, 0, 1 n) be the Mukai vector of the ideal sheaf of a length n subscheme of a K3 − e surface S. Then the co-rank 1 sublattice v⊥ of the Mukai lattice H(S, Z) contains H2(S, Z). Let θ : H2(S, Z) H2(S[n], Z) be the homomorphism (3.10). Denote by θ : H2(S, Q) → → H2(S[n], Q) the induced homomorphism as well. Let θ˜ : H(S, Q) He (S[n], Q) be the extension → mapping α to α and β to β. Let η : O(H(S, Q)) O(H(S[n], Q)) be the homomorphism extending an isometry by acting as the identity on the orthog→ e onal complemente span (0, δ, 0) of Q{ } the image of θ˜. Explicitly, ηg(θ˜(x)) = θ˜(g(x)),e and ηg(0, δ, 0)e = (0, δ, 0), for all g O(H(S, Q)). The following was proven for n = 2 in [Ta, Theorem 9.4]. Given an element φ∈of DMon(S) denote by φ[n] its image in DMon(S[n]) via the functor (5.3). Denote the image ofe φ[n] in O(H˜ (S[n], Q)) via (5.1) by H(φ[n]). Define H(φ) O(H˜ (S, Q)) similarly. ∈ Theorem 12.2. H(φ[n]) = det(H(φ))n+1 B η B . e e−δ/2 ◦ φ ◦ δ/2 + Proof. Recall thateDMon(S) =eO (H(S, Z)), by [Ta, Prop. 9.2]. Let us first verify the theorem for all φ O+(H(S, Q)) satisfying φ(α) = α and φ(β) = β. Note that in this case B η B =∈η . Such φ belongse to the monodromy group O+(H2(S, Z)) of S. Then the −δ/2 ◦ φ ◦ δ/2 φ image φ[n] of φ in the monodromye group of S[n] acts on H2(S[n], Z) via φ[n](θ(x)) = θ(φ(x)) and φ[n](δ)= δ. This determines the action SH(φ[n]) of φ[n] on the subring SH(S[n], Q)) generated by H2(S[n], Q). The action of H(φ[n]) on the image of Ψ in Symn(H(S[n], Q)) is determined as follows. If n is odd, then Ψ is equivariant, by Theorem 5.3. If n is even, then e e Ψ det(H(φ[n]))SH(φ[n]) = Symn(H(φ[n])) Ψ, ◦ ◦ by Theorem 5.3. Now Ψ is monodromye equivariant withe respect to the action of ηφ on H(S[n], Q). If n is odd, the theorem follows for φ. If n is even we get that det(H(φ[n])) = 1 η if det(H(φ)) = 1, and so H(φ[n])= φ e η if det(H(φ)) = 1. e φ − e − + It remainse to verify the theorem for the index 2 subgroup SO (H(S, Z)) of DMon(S). The statement of the theorem for this subroupe is equivalent to the statement that the composition e ˜ [n] B− δ θ : H(S, Q) H(S , Q) 2 ◦ → is SO+(H(S, Z))-equivariant, since SO+(eH(S, Z)) doese not have any non-trivial characters, and so must act trivially on the one-dimensional orthogonal complement span u , u := { 0} 0 e e 68 EYAL MARKMAN

(0, δ, 1 n)= B− δ (0, δ, 0), of its image. Note ﬁrst the equality − 2 [n] (12.2) (Bλ) = Bθ(λ), for all λ H2(S, Q). It suﬃces to prove (12.2) for integral λ, and by varying the complex structure,∈ we may assume that λ is of type (1, 1). Given a line bundle L on S, the equivariant line bundle (L⊠ ⊠L, ρ⊠) over Sn is a pullback of a line bundle on the symmetric product · · · L S(n). We have the commutative diagram

Γ ❋ ②② ❋❋ b ② ❋❋ q ②② ❋❋ ②② ❋❋ |②② # Sn S[n] ❉❉ ② ❉❉ ②② ❉❉ ②② q¯ ❉❉ ② ¯ " |②② b S(n). S S Hence, BKR((L ⊠ ⊠ L, ρ⊠)) = Rq n (Lb∗Lq¯∗ ) = Rq n (Lq∗L¯b∗ ) = ¯b∗ . We get that · · · ∼ ∗ L ∼ ∗ L ∼ L S ∗ ∗ ∗ BKR((F ⊠ ⊠ F, λ) (L ⊠ ⊠ L, ρ⊠)) = Rq n (Lb (F ⊠ ⊠ F, λ) Lq L¯b ) = · · · ⊗ · · · ∼ ∗ · · · ⊗ L ∼ S ∗ ∗ Rq n (Lb (F ⊠ ⊠ F, λ)) L¯b = BKR(F ⊠ ⊠ F, λ) BKR((L ⊠ ⊠ L, ρ⊠)), ∗ · · · ⊗ L ∼ · · · ⊗ · · · where the second isomorphism is via the projection formula. The equality (12.2) thus follows ∗ for λ = c1(L) from the well known equality θ(c1(L)) = c1(¯b ). Passing to Lie algebras we get the homomorphism L (12.3) [n] : so(H(S, Q)) so(H(S[n], Q)) → and the equality e[n] = e . As B[n] commutes with H(φ[n]), by Equation (4.9), so does e[n] λ θ(λ) λ e e χ λ and hence so does e . This agrees with the fact that the eigenspace V := (0.δ, n 1)⊥ of θ(λ) − [n] 2 e H(φχ ) is e -invariant, for all λ H (S, Q). θ(λ) ∈ Every non-trivial 24-dimensional representation of so(H(S, Q)) is isomorphic to H(S, Q). Hencee there exists an isomorphism γ : H(S, Q) V e e → of so(H(S, Q))-modules, which must also be an isomorphism of SO+(H(S, Q))-representations. e 2 The element β of H(S, Q) spans the common kernel of eλ, λ H (S, Q). Hence, the element γ(β) muste belong to the common kernel span β of e , λ ∈H2(S, Qe ). We may normalize γ { } θ(λ) ∈ to satisfy γ(β)= βe. Letγ ˜ : H(S, Q) H(S, Q) be the compositionγ ˜ = θ˜−1 B γ, where θ˜−1 : (0, δ, 0)⊥ → ◦ δ/2 ◦ → H(S, Q) is the left inverse of θ˜. Thenγ ˜ is SO+(H2(S, Z))-equivariant (the two actions, via [n] and viaeη coincide fore this subgroup, as demonstrated in the ﬁrst paragraph of the proof). ˜−1 + 2 + 2 Indeed,e both θ and Bδ/2 are SO (H (S, Z))-equivariant and γ is SO (H (S, Z))-equivariant as it is SO+(H(S, Q))-equivariant by assumption. Hence,γ ˜ must map H2(S, Q) to itself and act on it by 1. Being an isometry,γ ˜ maps the orthogonal complement U := span α, β of 2 ± 2 { } H (S, Q) to itself.e Furthermore,γ ˜(β)= β, andγ ˜ commutes with eλ, for all λ H (S, Q). Thus γ˜(α)= α, since α is the unique isotropic class in U which pairs to 1 with β∈. Finally,γ ˜(λ)= − VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 69

˜ + γ˜(eλ(α)) = eλ(˜γ(α)) = eλ(α) = λ. Henceγ ˜ is the identity. Hence B− δ θ is SO (H(S, Q))- 2 ◦ equivariant. The theorem is thus verified also for the subgroup SO+(H(S, Z)) of DMon(S). e e 13. A reflexive torsion free Fourier-Mukai image of a lagrangian line bundle with a positive LLV line Let S be a K3 surface of degree 6 in P4. The Fano variety of lines on a smooth cubic 3-folds C containing S embeds as a smooth Lagrangian surface Z in the Hilbert scheme S[2]. In Section 13.1 we state the main result of this section that the images Ek of the natural line bundles (k) on Z via a particular Fourier-Mukai auto-equivalence Φ[2] of Db(S[2]) are reflexive OZ P,χ torsion free sheaves, for k sufficiently large, and we compute the LLV line of Ek (Proposition 13.2). The auto-equivalence Φ[2] is the BKR-conjugate of the auto-equivalence of Db(S S) P,χ × induced by tensoring with the sign character χ of S2 the cartesian-square of the spherical twist Φ of Db(S) with respect to . In Section 13.2 we describe in more detail the equivalences P OS BKR : Db (S S) Db(S[2]) and Φ ⊠ : Db(S S) Db(S S). In section 13.3 we provide S2 P P a local coordinate× description→ of strict transforms× of cert→ ain diagonals× in the cartesian square S\S S\S of the blow-up S\S of the diagonal in S S. In Section 13.4 we provide an × × × [2] [2] × × [2] explicit complex over S S representing the Fourier-Mukai kernel of ΦP,χ (Lemma 13.6). × [2] In Section 13.5 we provide a general criterion for the Fourier-Mukai image via ΦP,χ of a line- bundle over a lagrangian surface in S[2] to be a reflexive torsion free sheaf (Lemma 13.8). We then verify that the hypotheses of this criterion are satisfied for sufficiently large powers Z (k) of the natural ample line bundle over the Fano variety of lines Z over a cubic 3-fold. In SectionO 13.6 we complete the proof of Proposition 13.2.

13.1. Fourier-Mukai images of line bundles on the Fano variety of lines on a cubic 3-fold. Let S be a K3 surface. Let ∆ : S S S the diagonal embedding, and let ΦP : Db(S) Db(S) be the auto-equivalence with→ Fourier-Mukai× kernel the complex given by →∆ supported in degrees 0 and 1. is quasi-isomorphic to the ideal sheafP of the OS×S → ∗OS P diagonal. We will denote ∆∗ S by ∆S and use a similar abuse of notation for subschemes 4 [2] [2] O O of S and S S .ΦP is the spherical twist with respect to the spherical object S. We × b b O get the auto-equivalence ΦP ⊠ ΦP : D (S S) D (S S) of S2-equivariant categories. S2 × → S2 × Denote by Φ[2] : Db(S[2]) Db(S[2]) its conjugate (4.7) via the BKR equivalence. Let Φ be P → χ the auto-equivalence of Db (S S) corresponding to tensorization with the sign character χ of S2 × [2] b [2] b [2] S and let Φχ : D (S ) D (S ) be its conjugate (4.8) via the BKR equivalence. Set 2 → Φ[2] := Φ[2] Φ[2]. P,χ χ ◦ P Let Q be a quadric in P4 and let C be a cubic in P4 satisfying the following. Assumption 13.1. (1) Q and C are smooth and their intersection S := Q C is smooth. (2) S does not contain any line. ∩ (3) C does not have any Eckhardt points, i.e., through every point of C pass only ﬁnitely many lines on C. 70 EYAL MARKMAN

Note that S is a K3 surface. The Fano variety F (C) of lines on C is a smooth surface, by [CG]. Let (13.1) g : F (C) S[2] → be the morphism sending a line ℓ on C to the length 2 subscheme ℓ Q of S. Let (1) ∩ OF (C) be the pull back of the line bundle Gr(2,5)(1) via the inclusion F (C) Gr(2, 5). Set h := 2 O[2] ⊂ c1( S(1)) and let h˜ := θ(h) H (S , Z) be its image via (3.10). Set Z := g(F (C)) and O(1) := g (1). Keep the∈ notation for elements of the rational LLV lattice as triples OZ ∗OF (C) introduced in Equation (12.1). Following is the main result of this section. Proposition 13.2. The image g(F (C)) is a smooth lagrangian surface in S[2] and g has ∗OF (C) a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map (Definition 6.11(2)). For all integers k sufficiently large the object Φ[2] (g (k)) is isomorphic to a reflexive torsion free sheaf E over S[2] of rank P,χ ∗OF (C) k 45k2 and c (E ) = 15kh˜ 45k(k+1) δ. The sheaf E has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction 1 k − − 2 k map and ℓ(E ) is spanned by 45k2, 15kh˜ 45k(k−1) δ, 45k(k−2) . The sheaf E fits in a short k − − 2 − 4 k exact sequence 0 0 ak (13.2) 0 E H (Z, (k + 1)) C [2] H (Z, (k)) C [2] ( δ) F 0, → k → OZ ⊗ OS ⊕ OZ ⊗ OS − → k → ˜ where Fk is a torsion free sheaf of rank 12 and c1(Fk) = 15kh 6δ. The restriction of ak to − the first direct summand is surjective onto Fk, while the image of its restriction to the second summand is isomorphic to F [2] ( δ). k−1 ⊗ OS − The proposition is proved at the end of this section. Note that E is the image of g via k ∗OF (C) an auto-equivalence, hence dim Exti(E , E ) = dimExti(g , g ) = dim Hi(F (C), C), k k ∗OF (C) ∗OF (C) where the latter equality follows from [Ml, Theorem 0.1.3]. In particular, Ek is simple, i.e., 1 2 Hom(Ek, Ek) = C, dimExt (Ek, Ek) = 10, and dim Ext (Ek, Ek) = 45, by Example 3.11(2). ∼ 14 We do not know if Ek is slope-stable for line bundles in some open subcone of the ample cone. If it is, then Theorem 3.4 would apply and the Azumaya algebra nd(E ) would deform with E k S[2] to every irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifold of K3[2]-type. Remark 13.3. Assumption 13.1 does not rule out the case where S contains a smooth conic and hence admits an elliptic fibration onto the pencil of hyperplane sections containing the conic. In this case S[2] admits a lagrangian fibration the generic fiber of which is the product of two elliptic curves. Techniques for proving stability of vector bundles over IHSMs admitting lagrangian fibrations were developed in [O2, Prop. 3.6]. 13.2. Explicit description of the isospectral Hilbert scheme for n = 2. Let S be a K3 surface. Let b : S\S S S be the blow-up of the diagonal, and q : S\S S[2] the × → × × → quotient map by the natural S2-action. The BKR equivalence, given in (4.4), BKR : Db (S S) Db(S[2]) S2 × → is the composition RqS2 Lb∗, where RqS2 : Db (S\S) Db(S[2]) is the equivariant pushfor- ∗ ◦ ∗ S2 × → ∗ b b \ ward associated to the homomorphism S2 1 , and Lb : D (S S) D (S S) is the → { } S2 × → S2 × 14 We check in Remark 13.13 that the intersections of Ek with each of the two direct summands in (13.2) do not slope-destabilize Ek for polarizations in an open subcone of the ample cone. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 71

S2 equivariant pullback. The functor Rq∗ takes an S2-equivariant object F to the S2-invariant S2 direct summand (Rq∗(F )) of the object Rq∗(F ). The morphism (b, q) : S\S (S S) S[2] embeds S\S isomorphically onto the isospectral × → × × × Hilbert scheme Γ. The sheaf Γ admits a natural S2 1 linearization ρ and ( Γ, ρ) is the Fourier-Mukai kernel of the functorO BKR given in (4.4).× Its inverse has Fourier-MukaiO kernel ( ∨[2], ρ∨) = (ω , ρ ) in Db (S[2] (S S)), where ρ is the natural linearization (see Γ ∼ Γ ω 1×S2 ω O × × ∗ [Hu3, Cor. 3.40 and Prop. 5.9]). Note the isomorphism ωΓ ∼= Γ(D) ∼= q S[2] (δ), where D Γ is the exceptional divisor of b and δ is half the class ofO the divisorO of non-reduced ⊂ [2] ∗ subschemes in S . The pulled back linearization on q S[2] (δ) sends a global section to minus 0 [2] O itself, since H (S , [2] (δ)) = 0. On the other hand, the linearization ρ corresponds on ω OS ω Γ to the one which sends a global section to itself. Hence, Φ : Db(S[2]) Db (S S) is the (ωΓ,ρω) → S2 × S2 ∗ composition of tensorization by [2] (δ), followed by R b χ Lq , where χ is the non-trivial OS ∗ ◦ ⊗ character of S2. Indeed,

(13.3) BKR( , 1) = [2] , and OS×S ∼ OS BKR( ,χ) = [2] ( δ), OS×S ∼ OS − −1 −1 as observed already in (4.6), and so BKR ( S[2] ) = ( S×S, 1) and BKR ( S[2] ( δ)) = O ∼ O −1 O − ∼ ( S×S,χ), which agrees with the above description of BKR . O [2] b [2] b [2] The following lemma describes the involutive auto-equivalence Φχ : D (S ) D (S ), given in (4.8), which is the BKR conjugate of tensorization with the sign character→χ. Lemma 13.4. The following isomorphisms holds for every object E in Db(S[2]) and every object (F, ρ) in Db (S S). S2 × [2] −1 −1 ∨ ∨ Φ (E) := BKR(BKR (E) χ) = (BKR BKR (E)) [2] ( δ), χ ⊗ ∼ ⊗ OS − ∨ ∨ ∨ BKR(F, ρ χ) = (BKR(F , ρ )) [2] ( δ). ⊗ ∼ ⊗ OS − Proof. The existence of the second isomorphism is equivalent to that of the first, by setting E = BKR(F, ρ). We prove the second. ∨ [BKR(F ∨, ρ∨)]∨ = RqS2 (Lb∗(F ∨, ρ∨)) = RqS2 ((ω , ρ ) Lb∗(F, ρ)) ∼ ∗ ∼ ∗ S[×S ω ⊗ h S2 ∗ i ∗ S2 ∗ = Rq [χ Lq [2] (δ) Lb (F, ρ)] = [2] (δ) Rq (Lb (F, ρ χ)) ∼ ∗ ⊗ OS ⊗ ∼ OS ⊗ ∗ ⊗ = [2] (δ) BKR(F, ρ χ), ∼ OS ⊗ ⊗ where the first isomorphism is a definition, the second is by equivariant Grothendieck-Verdier ∗ duality, the third by the isomorphism (ω , ρ χ) = Lq [2] (δ), the fourth by the projection S[×S ω ⊗ ∼ OS formula, and the fifth by definition of BKR. Denote by S the diagonal subgroup of S S . The non-unit of S acts by (x ,x ,x ,x ) 2,∆ 2× 2 2,∆ 1 2 3 4 7→ (x2,x1,x4,x3). We get the S2,∆-equivariant object ⊠ := Lπ∗ Lπ∗ P P 13P⊗ 24P over (S S) (S S), endowed with the linearization ρ⊠ acting by permuting the factors. The object ×⊠ ×is represented× by the complex P P α β (13.4) 4 , OS → O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 → O∆13∩∆24 72 EYAL MARKMAN

4 where ∆ij S is the subvariety of quadruples (x1,x2,x3,x4) satisfying xi = xj, β is the diﬀerence of⊂ the natural homomorphisms from each direct summand, and α is the direct sum of the two natural homomorphisms. Note that ker(β) is ∆13∪∆24 and so the above complex is O b quasi-isomorphic to the ideal sheaf ∆ ∪∆ . The integral transform Φ ⊠ : D (S S) I 13 24 (P P,ρ⊠) S2 × → Db (S S) is an auto-equivalence, which is conjugated via the BKR equivalence to an auto- S2 equivalence× [2] b [2] b [2] Φ := Φ Φ ⊠ Φ : D (S ) D (S ), P (OΓ,ρ) ◦ (P P,ρ⊠) ◦ (ωΓ,ρω) → by [P, Lemma 5(3)]. Composing Φ(P⊠P,ρ⊠) with the auto-equivalence Φχ of tensoring with the sign character χ of S2 we get the auto-equivalence Φ(P⊠P,χ⊗ρ⊠) and we denote its BKR- conjugate by Φ[2] : Db(S[2]) Db(S[2]). The projections π : (S S) (S S) (S S), P,χ → i × × × → × i = 1, 2, are equivariant with respect to the natural isomorphism S S , and we get 2,∆ → 2 Φ Φ ⊠ =Φ ⊠ Φ . We have χ ◦ (P P,ρ⊠) (P P,ρ⊠) ◦ χ Φ[2] =Φ[2] Φ[2] =Φ[2] Φ[2], P,χ χ ◦ P P ◦ χ by Equation (4.9). [2] [2] Lemma 13.5. Φ ( [2] ) = [2] ( δ)[ 4] and Φ ( [2] ( δ)) = [2] [ 4]. P.χ OS ∼ OS − − P.χ OS − ∼ OS − Proof. The isomorphism Φ ( ) = [ 2] explains the third isomorphism below. P OS ∼ OS − [2] −1 Φ ( [2] ) = BKR χ Φ ⊠ (BKR ( [2] )) P.χ OS ∼ ⊗ (P P,ρ⊠) OS (4.6) = BKR χ Φ ⊠ ( , 1) = BKR (χ ( [ 4], 1)) ∼ ⊗ (P P,ρ⊠) OS×S ∼ ⊗ OS×S − (4.6) Lemma 13.4 ∨ = (BKR( [4], 1)) [2] ( δ) = [2] ( δ)[ 4]. ∼ OS×S ⊗ OS − ∼ OS − − The proof of the second isomorphism is similar. [2] −1 Φ ( [2] ( δ)) = BKR χ Φ ⊠ (BKR ( [2] ( δ))) P.χ OS − ∼ ⊗ (P P,ρ⊠) OS − = BKR χ Φ ⊠ ( ,χ)) = BKR(( , 1)[ 4]) = [2] [ 4]. ∼ ⊗ (P P,ρ⊠) OS×S ∼ OS×S − ∼ OS − 13.3. A local coordinate description of the strict transforms of diagonals. We will need a local coordinates description of S\S S\S and its exceptional divisors. We replace 2 × × × S by C and let (xi,yi) be coordinates on the i-th factor of S. Let (s : t) be homogeneous coordinates on P1. The blow-up of C2 at the origin is the hypersurface V (xt ys) in C2 P1. Let z = s/t denote the aﬃne coordinate on P1 (1 : 0) . Away from C2 −(1 : 0) the blow-× \ { } × { } up has coordinates y, z and x = yz. The exceptional divisor Dˆ is V (y) in these coordinates. Consider the map C2 C2 C2 C2, × → × ((x ,y ), (x ,y )) ((x ,y ), (x x ,y y )). 1 1 2 2 7→ 1 1 1 − 2 1 − 2 The blow-up of the left copy of C2 C2 along the diagonal corresponds to the blow-up along × C2 0 via the above change of coordinates. Hence, S\S embeds as the subvariety × { } × V ((x x )t (y y )s) 1 − 2 − 1 − 2 VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 73

2 2 1 of C C P and has coordinates x1,y1,y2, z, and x1 x2 = (y1 y2)z, away from the divisor×C2 ×C2 (1 : 0) . The exceptional divisor is V (y− y ) in these− coordinates. Over × × { } 1 − 2 S\S S\S we get the coordinates × × × (x1,y1,y2, z1; x3,y3,y4, z2) satisfying x1 x2 = (y1 y2)z1 and x3 x4 = (y3 y4)z2. The strict transform ∆ˆ 13 of ∆13 in \ \− − − − S S S S corresponds to V (x1 x3,y1 y3). The strict transform ∆ˆ 24 of ∆24 corresponds to×V (y× y×,x x ), where x = x− z (y− y ) and x = x z (y y ). The intersection 2 − 4 2 − 4 2 1 − 1 1 − 2 4 3 − 2 3 − 4 ∆ˆ ∆ˆ is given by 13 ∩ 24 ∆ˆ ∆ˆ = V (x x ,y y ,y y , (y y )(z z )), where 13 ∩ 24 1 − 3 1 − 3 2 − 4 1 − 2 1 − 2 Dˆ Dˆ = V (x x ,y y ,y y ,y y ) ×S 1 − 3 1 − 3 2 − 4 1 − 2 ∆ = V (x x ,y y ,y y , z z ). S[×S 1 − 3 1 − 3 2 − 4 1 − 2 Note that x x ,y y ,y y , (y y )(z z ) is a regular sequence, and so ∆ˆ ∆ˆ is a 1 − 3 1 − 3 2 − 4 1 − 2 1 − 2 13 ∩ 24 complete intersection. Consider the sections s1 := (x1 x3,y1 y3) and s2 := (y2 y4,x2 x4) ⊕2 − − − − of . The Koszul complex associated to s1 is a locally free resolution of ˆ and OS[×S×S[×S O∆13 the one associated to s is a locally free resolution of . The tensor product of these two 2 ∆ˆ 24 O ⊕4 Koszul complexes is the Koszul complex associated to the section (s1,s2) of , which OS[×S×S[×S is exact, as the section (s1,s2) is regular. Hence, the torsion sheaves ori( ˆ , ˆ ) vanish, T O∆13 O∆24 for i> 0.

13.4. The kernel of the BKR-conjugate of the square of a spherical twist by S. Let I S[2] S[2] be the incidence variety consisting of pairs of ideals of non-disjoint subschemes.O ⊂ × Let ν : I˜ I be its normalization. Let ∆ˆ be the strict transform of ∆ in S\S S\S. → ij ij × × × Let δˆ : S\S S\S S\S be the diagonal embedding and denote its image by ∆ . Let × → × × × S[×S Dˆ S\S be the exceptional divisor of b. Then ∆ˆ ∆ˆ =∆ Dˆ Dˆ and each of ∆ˆ ⊂ × 13 ∩ 24 S[×S ∪ ×S 13 and ∆ˆ 24 is naturally isomorphic to I˜. The diagonal involution interchanges ∆ˆ 13 and ∆ˆ 24 leaving Dˆ Dˆ pointwise invariant. Thus Dˆ Dˆ embeds naturally in I˜ and we denote its image by ×S ×S Dˆ S Dˆ as well. Denote by ˜ ˆ ˆ the ideal sheaf of Dˆ S Dˆ in I˜. The homomorphism × II,D×S D × ˜ ∆ maps a local function vanishing to order 1 along Dˆ S Dˆ to an anti-invariant OI → O S[×S × function with respect to the diagonal involution. We have the short exact sequence ∗ 0 I,D×SD∪∆ ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ ∆ π1 [2] ( δ) 0. →I S[2] → II,D×SD → O S[2] ⊗ OS − → [2] b [2] b [2] Lemma 13.6. (1) The auto-equivalence ΦP : D (S ) D (S ) is the Fourier-Mukai transformation with kernel →

[2] ∗ ∗ ∗ a := π [2] (δ) π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ) ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ , P 1OS ⊗ { 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − } → II,D×S D h i where the homomorphism a is surjective and is induced from the restriction homomorphism [ [ ˆ ˆ via push-forward via q q and taking the S2,∆-anti- OS×S×S×S → O∆13∪∆24 × invariant subsheaves. 74 EYAL MARKMAN

(2) The auto-equivalence Φ[2] : Db(S[2]) Db(S[2]) is the Fourier-Mukai transformation P,χ → with kernel [2] ∗ ∗ ∗ aχ := π [2] (δ) [2] [2] [π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ)] , Pχ 1OS ⊗ OS ×S ⊕ 1OS − ⊗ 2OS − → OI h i where the homomorphismaχ is surjective and is induced from the restriction homomorphism [ [ ˆ ˆ via push-forward via q q and taking the S2,∆-invariant OS×S×S×S → O∆13∪∆24 × subsheaves. [2] ∗ S2,∆ ∗ ⊠ Proof. (1). Step 1: The kernel of ΦP is isomorphic to π1 S[2] (δ) R(q q)∗ (L(b b) ( )) , by the argument below using the following diagram. O ⊗ × × P P

S\S S\S ✐ ❱❱❱ ✐✐✐✐× × × ❱❱❱❱ q×q ✐✐✐ ❱❱❱❱b×b ✐✐✐✐ (q,b)×(b,q) ❱❱❱❱ ✐✐✐ ❱❱❱❱ t✐✐✐ ❱❱+ S[2] S[2] o [S[2] (S S)] [(S S) S[2]] / (S S) (S S). × π14 × × × × × π23 × × × Above π is the projection onto the product of the i-th and j-th factors, where each (S S) is ij × regarded as a single factor of the middle bottom variety in the diagram. Letπ ˆi be the projection from S\S S\S to the i-th factor, i = 1, 2. The object Lπ∗ R(b, q) is isomorphic to × × × 34 ∗OS[×S the structure sheaf of [(S S) S[2]] Γ. Similarly, Lπ∗ R(q, b) is isomorphic to the × × × 12 ∗OS[×S structure sheaf of Γ [S[2] (S S)]. The transversality of these two subschemes yields the isomorphism × × × (13.5) [Lπ∗ R(b, q) ] Lπ∗ R(q, b) = R((q, b) (b, q)) . 34 ∗OS[×S ⊗ 12 ∗OS[×S ∼ × ∗OS[×S×S[×S [2] The kernel of ΦP is isomorphic to

S2,∆ ∗ S ∗ S ∗ Rπ [Lπ R(b, q) 2 ( , 1)] [Lπ R(q, b) 2 (ω , ρ )] Lπ ( ⊠ , ρ⊠) = 14,∗ 34 ∗ OS[×S ⊗ 12 ∗ S[×S ω ⊗ 23 P P ∼ n S2,∆ S2,∆ ∗ ∗ o Rπ R((q, b) (b, q)) (Lπˆ (ω , ρ )) Lπ ( ⊠ , ρ⊠) = 14,∗ × ∗ 1 S[×S ω ⊗ 23 P P ∼ S2,∆ n S2,∆ ∗ ∗ o Rπ R((q, b) (b, q)) Lπˆ (ω , ρ ) L(b b) ( ⊠ , ρ⊠) = 14,∗ × ∗ 1 S[×S ω ⊗ × P P ∼ n S2,∆ ∗ ∗ o R(q q) Lπˆ (ω , ρ ) L(b b) ( ⊠ , ρ⊠) = × ∗ 1 S[×S ω ⊗ × P P ∼ ∗ n S2,∆ ∗ o π [2] (δ) R(q q) (L(b b) ( ⊠ ,χ ρ⊠)) , 1OS ⊗ × ∗ × P P ⊗ where the ﬁrst isomorphism is due to (13.5) and cohomology and base change, the second isomorphism is due to the projection formula and the equality b b = π ((q, b) (b, q)), the × 23 ◦ × third is due to the equality q q = π14 ((q, b) (b, q)), and the fourth is due to the projection × ◦ × ∗ formula, the equality π (q q)= q πˆ , and the isomorphism (ω ,χ ρ ) = Lq [2] (δ). 1 ◦ × ◦ 1 S[×S ⊗ ω ∼ OS It remains to exhibit the isomorphism

S2,∆ ∗ ∗ ∗ a (13.6) R(q q)∗ (L(b b) ( ⊠ ,χ ρ⊠)) = π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ) ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ . × × P P ⊗ ∼ 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − → II,D×SD h i Step 2: (Calculation of L(b b)∗( ⊠ ,χ ρ⊠)). Recall that ∆ˆ is the strict transform of ∆ × P P ⊗ ij ij in S\S S\S. Let ∆˜ and ∆˜ be the strict transforms of ∆ and ∆ in S\S (S S). × × × 13 23 13 24 × × × VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 75

The subscheme ∆13 is transversal to ∆12 and ∆˜ 13 is transversal to ∆˜ 34, by a computation in local coordinates, and so L(b b)∗( ) is represented by . Then L(b b)∗( ⊠ ) is ∆13 ∆ˆ 13 L × O O × P P isomorphic to ˆ ˆ , which is isomorphic to I∆13 ⊗I∆24 L [ [ [ ˆ ] [ [ [ ˆ ], OS×S×S×S → O∆13 ⊗ OS×S×S×S → O∆24 and hence to the complex

αˆ βˆ L (13.7) [ [ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ . OS×S×S×S → O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 → O∆13 ⊗ O∆24 Note that ∆ˆ ∆ˆ is the union of the diagonal embedding of S\S and the ﬁber product 13 ∩ 24 × Dˆ Dˆ , where Dˆ S\S is the exceptional divisor of b. Hence, the intersection of ∆ˆ and ×S ⊂ × 13 ∆ˆ 24 is not transversal along the diagonal embedding of Dˆ. Nevertheless, ∆ˆ 13 ∆ˆ 24 is a complete L ∩ intersection and so the derived tensor product ˆ ˆ is represented by the usual tensor O∆13 ⊗ O∆24 product ˆ ˆ , which is isomorphic to ˆ ˆ , and the sheaves ori( ˆ , ˆ ) O∆13 ⊗ O∆24 O∆13∩∆24 T O∆13 O∆24 vanish for i> 0 (see Section 13.3). The complex (13.7) thus becomes

αˆ βˆ (13.8) [ [ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ OS×S×S×S → O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 → O∆13∩∆24 in degrees 0, 1, and 2 and with sheaf cohomology only in degree 0, so it is a right exact sequence. The homomorphismsα ˆ and βˆ are analogous to α and β in (13.4). Furthermore, the short exact sequence

0 ˆ [ [ ˆ 0 →I∆13 → OS×S×S×S → O∆13 → yields the isomorphism ori( ˆ , F ) = ori+1( ˆ , F ), for every coherent sheaf F and for T I∆13 ∼ T O∆13 i > 0, and similarly for ˆ . The symmetry of the functor or yields ori( ˆ , ˆ ) = I∆24 T T I∆13 I∆24 ∼ or ( , ) = 0, for all i> 0. Hence, the complex (13.8) represents the sheaf i+2 ∆ˆ 13 ∆ˆ 24 ∆ˆ 13 ∆ˆ 24 T O O L I ⊗I (as well as the object ˆ ˆ ). Finally, ˆ ˆ is isomorphic to the kernel ˆ ˆ I∆13 ⊗I∆24 I∆13 ⊗I∆24 I∆13∪∆24 ofα, ˆ by the right exactness of (13.8). Step 3: (First step in the construction of the homomorphism a in (13.6)). The quotient \ \ [2] [2] map q q : S S S S S S restricts to the complement of ∆ˆ 13 ∆ˆ 24 in each of ˆ × ˆ × × × → × ∩ ∆13 and ∆24 as an isomorphism onto I [∆S[2] D S D], but I is singular along ∆S[2] , as \ ∪ ×15 q q :∆ ∆ [2] has degree 2, while it is smooth along [D D] ∆ [2] . The diagonal × S[×S → S ×S \ S involution interchanges ∆ˆ 13 and ∆ˆ 24. We conclude that both ∆ˆ 13 and ∆ˆ 24 are isomorphic to

15 The kernel of d(q × q) at a point p of S\× S × S\× S is the sum of non-trivial characters of S2 × S2. Let 4 σij ∈ S2 × S2 be the transposition interchanging xi and xj in (x1,x2,x3,x4) ∈ S . At a point p of ∆ˆ 13 ∩ ∆ˆ 24 the trivial eigenspace in Tp[S\× S × S\× S] of each of σ12 and σ34 has codimension 1, and the kernel of d(q × q) is the 2-dimensional −1-eigenspace of the diagonal involution σ12σ34. The latter interchanges Tp∆ˆ 13 and Tp∆ˆ 24, and so if ξ ∈ Tp∆ˆ 13 is a −1-eigenvector of σ12σ34, then ξ belongs to Tp∆ˆ 13 ∩ Tp∆ˆ 24. The computation in local ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ coordinates in Section 13.3 shows that ∆13 and ∆24 intersect transversally along D ×S D \ [∆S[×S]. Hence, at a point p of the latter, Tp∆ˆ 13 ∩ Tp∆ˆ 24 = Tp[Dˆ ×S Dˆ ] is contained in the 1-eigenspace of σ12σ34 and so d(q × q) restricts to Tp[Dˆ ×S Dˆ ] as an injective homomorphism. 76 EYAL MARKMAN the normalization I˜ of I and q q restricts to each as the normalization morphism ν : I˜ I. × → The linearizationρ ¯⊠ induced by ρ⊠ on ˆ ˆ is the usual one, O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 ∗ ρ¯⊠,g : ˆ ˆ g ˆ ˆ = ˆ ˆ , O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 → O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 O∆24 ⊕ O∆13 h i ρ¯⊠,g(f1,f2) = (f2,f1), for g the involution in S2,∆. On the other hand, the linearization on ˆ ˆ induced by ρ⊠ is the sign character χ, so that the diﬀerence homomorphism βˆ in O∆13∩∆24 (13.8) is S2,∆-equivariant. Now,

(q q)∗( ˆ ˆ ) = ν∗ ˜ (ν∗ ˜ C χ) × O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 ∼ OI ⊕ OI ⊗ and we get the isomorphisms

S2,∆ ν∗ ˜ = R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ , ρ¯⊠), OI ∼ × O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 S2,∆ (13.9) ν∗ ˜ = R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ ,χ ρ¯⊠). OI ∼ × O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 ⊗ \ \ Set DI1 := ∆ˆ 13 [Dˆ S S] and DI2 := ∆ˆ 13 [S S Dˆ]. We have DI1 DI2 = Dˆ S Dˆ . ∗ ∩ × × ˆ ∩ × × ∩ × Now, (q πˆi) [2] ( δ) restricts to ∆13 as ˆ ( DIi). Hence, the sum of the restriction ◦ OS − O∆13 − homomorphismsc yields the surjectivec homomorphisms c c ∗ ∗ c (q πˆ1) [2] ( δ) (q πˆ2) [2] ( δ) ˆ ˆ ˆ , ◦ OS − ⊕ ◦ OS − → I∆13,D×SD ∗ ∗ (q πˆ1) [2] ( δ) (q πˆ2) [2] ( δ) ˆ ˆ ˆ . ◦ OS − ⊕ ◦ OS − → I∆24,D×SD Note the isomorphism ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ (q πˆ ) [2] ( δ) (q πˆ ) [2] ( δ) = L(q q) (π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ)). ◦ 1 OS − ⊕ ◦ 2 OS − ∼ × 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − S2,∆ The right hand side comes with a natural S2,∆-linearization. Evaluating the functor R(q q)∗ on the homomorphismα ˆ in (13.8) χ we get × ⊗ S (13.10) R 2,∆ ,χ ν . q×q,∗ OS[×S×S[×S → ∗OI˜ Step 4: We show next that the above displayed homomorphism factors through a surjective homomorphism ∗ ∗ a (13.11) π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ) ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ . 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − → II,D×SD The complex R is isomorphic to the pushforward (q q) , which q×q,∗OS[×S×S[×S × ∗OS[×S×S[×S decomposes as the direct sum of four character line subbundles for the S S -action 2 × 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ R = [2] [2] π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ) [π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ)]. q×q,∗OS[×S×S[×S ∼ OS ×S ⊕ 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − ⊕ 1OS − ⊗ 2OS − S2,∆ ∗ ∗ Thus R ,χ is the rank two vector bundle π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ). The q×q,∗ OS[×S×S[×S 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − homomorphism α ˆ in (13.8) restricts to

S2,∆ ∗ ∗ S2,∆ R(q q)∗ (ˆα) : π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ) R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ ,χ ρ¯⊠) = ν∗ I , × 1OS − ⊕ 2OS − → × O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 ⊗ ∼ O S2,∆ whose image is claimed to be ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ . The exactness of R(q q)∗ implies that to verify II,D×S D × S2,∆ the latter claim it remains to prove that R(q q)∗ (ker(βˆ) χ) is isomorphic to ν∗ ˜ ˆ ˆ , × ⊗ II,D×S D where βˆ is the homomorphism in (13.8) χ. ⊗ VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 77

S2,∆ S2,∆ Note that R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ ,χ) = 0 and R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ , 1) = D× D. Similarly, × OD×SD × OD×S D O S S2,∆ R(q q)∗ ( ∆ ∩Dˆ × Dˆ ,χ) = 0. The short exact sequence × O S[×S S

0 ∆ ∪Dˆ × Dˆ ∆ [ Dˆ × Dˆ ∆ ∩Dˆ × Dˆ 0 → O S[×S S → O S×S ⊕ O S → O S[×S S → yields the isomorphisms

S2,∆ S2,∆ ∗ (13.12) R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ ,χ) = R(q q)∗ ( ∆ [ ,χ) = ∆ π1 [2] ( δ), × O∆13∩∆24 ∼ × O S×S ∼ O S[2] ⊗ OS − S2,∆ (13.13) R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ , 1) = [∆ ∪D× D]. × O∆13∩∆24 ∼ O S[2] S The kernel of S (13.9) 2,∆ ˆ S2,∆ R(q×q)∗ (β) S2,∆ ν∗ ˜ = R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ ,χ ρ¯⊠) R(q q)∗ ( ˆ ˆ , 1) = [∆ ∪D× D] OI ∼ × O∆13 ⊕O∆24 ⊗ → × O∆13∩∆24 ∼ O S[2] S S is equal to the image ν of R(q q) 2,∆ (ˆα). Indeed, if f is a local function on ∆ˆ then ∗ I,˜ Dˆ ×SDˆ ∗ 13 I ∗× ∗ the local anti-invariant section (f, σ σ (f)) of ˆ ˆ is mapped via the diﬀerence − 12 34 O∆13 ⊕ O∆24 homomorphism βˆ to the restriction of f + σ∗ σ∗ (f) to Dˆ Dˆ ∆ . If, furthermore, f is in 12 34 ×S ∪ S[×S the kernel of R(q q) (βˆ) then the restriction of f to ∆ is anti-invariant and its restriction × ∗ S[×S to Dˆ S Dˆ vanishes. This completes the proof that the morphism (13.10) factors through the sheaf× homomorphism a in (13.11). The construction of the isomorphism (13.6) is thus complete. S2,∆ Proof of part (2): Evaluating the functor R(q q)∗ on the short exact sequence (13.8) we get × S S 2,∆ 2,∆ ˆ ∗ ∗ (q×q)∗ (ˆα) (q×q)∗ (β) ∗ 0 [2] [2] [π1 [2] ( δ) π2 [2] ( δ)] ν∗ ˜ ∆ π1 [2] ( δ) 0, → OS ×S ⊕ OS − ⊗ OS − −→ OI −→ O S[2] ⊗ OS − → S2,∆ where we used the isomorphism (13.12). Now, (q q)∗ (ˆα) factors through the surjective homomorphism a onto . × χ OI [2] b [2] [2] [2] ∗ Remark 13.7. (1) The kernel χ in D (S S )ofΦ is the tensor product of π [2] (δ) P × P,χ 1OS with the pushforward to S[2] S[2] of the ideal sheaf in the quotient S\S S\S/S × × × × 2,∆ of the quotient (∆ˆ ∆ˆ )/S . 13 ∪ 24 2,∆ (2) The sheaves Ek and Fk in Proposition 13.2 have the following geometric interpreta- \ \ ′ tion. Set X := S S S S/S2,∆ and I := (∆ˆ 13 ∆ˆ 24)/S2,∆. Letπ ˜i be the × × ×[2] ∪ two projections from X to S , i = 1, 2. Set Z := g(F (C)). Then (˜π1, π˜2)∗ X is ∗ ∗ O [2] [2] [π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ)]. We have OS ×S ⊕ 1OS − ⊗ 2OS − π˜ (˜π∗g (k)) = π (˜π , π˜ ) π˜∗g (k) = π π∗g (k) (˜π , π˜ ) 2,∗ 1 ∗OF (C) ∼ 2,∗ 1 2 ∗ 1 ∗OF (C) ∼ 2,∗ 1 ∗OF (C) ⊗ { 1 2 ∗OX } ∗ ∗ ∗ = π π g (k) [2] [2] [π [2] ( δ) π [2] ( δ)] . ∼ 2,∗ 1 ∗OF (C) ⊗ OS ×S ⊕ 1OS − ⊗ 2OS − Thus, the graded sheaf of algebras 0 0 := [H (Z, (k)) C [2] ] [H (Z, (k)( δ)) C [2] ( δ)] A OZ ⊗ OS ⊕ OZ − ⊗ OS − k≥0 M [2] −1 over S has relative Proj the subschemeπ ˜1 (Z) of X. The k + 1 direct summand of appears in (13.2) due to the isomorphism (1) = (δ) established in Lemma A OZ ∼ OZ 78 EYAL MARKMAN

′ 13.12 below. The restriction ofπ ˜1 π˜2 to I is an isomorphism of the latter onto I. [2] × −1 ′ [2] [2] Hence, (Z S ) I is isomorphic toπ ˜ (Z) I . Let pi : (Z S ) I S be × ∩ ∗ ∩ × ∩ → the restriction of πi. The line bundle p1 Z (δ) corresponds to the graded -module [p p∗ (k)(δ)], which is isomorphicO to F , and E isA a graded ⊕k>0 2,∗ 1OZ ⊕k≥0 k+1 ⊕k≥0 k+1 -module corresponding to the ideal of (Z S[2]) I = π˜−1(Z) I′ inπ ˜−1(Z). A × ∩ ∼ ∩ 1 [2] 13.5. Reflexivity of the Fourier-Mukai image of Z (k). Let be a line bundle over S . [2] [2] O L Let πi be the projection from S S onto the i-th factor, i = 1, 2. Let Z be a two-dimensional non-singular subvariety of S[2]. Denote× by e : Z S[2] the inclusion. → Lemma 13.8. Assume that the following three conditions hold. (1) The projection π restricts to the intersection (Z S[2]) I as a finite and surjective 2 × ∩ morphism onto S[2] (13.14) π : (Z S[2]) I S[2]. 2 × ∩ → (2) Hi(Z, e∗ ) = 0 and Hi(Z, e∗( (δ))) = 0, for i> 0. (3) Let d be theL maximal length ofL fibers of the finite morphism (13.14). The homomorphism 0 ∗ 0 H (Z, e ( (δ))) H (A, (δ)|A ) is surjective, for every zero-dimensional subscheme A of Z ofL length → d. L ≤ Then Φ[2] (e e∗ ) is represented by a torsion free reflexive sheaf. P,χ ∗ L Proof. Note that Φ[2] (e e∗ ) is represented by the complex P,χ ∗ L 0 ∗ 0 ∗ aχ ∗ (13.15) H (Z, e ( (δ))) C [2] H (Z, e ) C [2] ( δ) π π ( (δ)) [2] , L ⊗ OS ⊕ L ⊗ OS − → 2,∗ 1 L ⊗ O(Z×S )∩I by Lemma 13.6 and assumptions (1) and (2). Furthermore, the homomorphism aχ is surjective, by assumption (3), and so Φ[2] (e e∗ ) is represented by the sheaf ker(a ). Each of the P,χ ∗ L χ irreducible components of (Z S[2]) I is 4-dimensional, since it has dimension 4 and is [2] × ∩ ∗ ≥ finite over S . Hence, the sheaf π π ( (δ)) [2] is torsion free and so ker(a ) is 2,∗ 1 L ⊗ O(Z×S )∩I χ reflexive, being a saturated subsheaf of a locally free sheaf. [2] Remark 13.9. (1) The sheaf ker(aχ) is locally free away from a closed subscheme of S of co-dimension 3 as it is reflexive. We claim that this closed subscheme of singularities ≥ of ker(aχ) is contained in Z. It suffices to show that the morphism (13.14) is flat over [2] ∗ S Z, since then the sheaf F := π π ( (δ)) [2] is locally free over \ 2,∗ 1 L ⊗ O(Z×S )∩I S[2] Z and the kernel of a surjective homomorphism of locally free sheaves is locally \ free as well. The length of the fiber of (13.14) over y S[2] is equal to the length of the ∈ intersection subscheme (Z S[2]) I (S[2] y ) of S[2] S[2], which is independent of × ∩ ∩ × { } × L L y as long as it is of the expected dimension 0 and the object [2] [2] OZ×S ⊗ OI ⊗ OS ×{y} is represented by the tensor product sheaf, i.e., all the higher torsion sheaves vanish. This is the case if the intersection (Z S[2]) I (S[2] y ) is contained in the × ∩ ∩ × { } non-singular locus of I. Indeed, in that case each of Z S[2], I, and S[2] y is non singular at every point p of their common intersection× and their local equations× { } at p yield a regular sequence for the subscheme (Z S[2]) I (S[2] y ) locally around × ∩ ∩ × { } VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 79

p. The Koszul complex associated to that regular sequence is exact on the one hand, and is isomorphic to the tensor product of the three Koszul complexes associated to the local equations of each of the three subvarieties. Hence, the higher torsion sheaves vanish, and the intersection multiplicity at each point p is equal to the length of the intersection subscheme at p. We have seen in Step 3 of the proof of Lemma 13.6 that the singular locus of I is the diagonal ∆S[2] . Hence, if y does not belong to Z the fiber over y is contained in the non-singular locus of I. The morphism (13.14) is thus flat over S[2] Z, by [Har, Theorem III.9.9]. (2) The sheaf\ F is not locally free over Z, hence not reflexive. Indeed, if y Z and y ∈ is reduced, then the intersection I (S[2] y ) consists of two smooth surfaces in ∩ × { } S[2] y meeting at (y,y), and so the intersection of I (S[2] y ) with Z y is a subscheme× { } with stalk at (y,y) of length at least 3 (while∩ the intersection× { } multiplicity× { } is 2 if Z is transversal at y to each of the two surfaces), by [Har, Appendix A, Example 1.1.1]. Nevertheless, ker(aχ) is locally free over the generic point of Z, being reflexive.

Lemma 13.10. The morphism g, given in (13.1), is a closed immersion. Z := g(F (C)) is a lagrangian surface in S[2] and the projection π restricts to (Z S[2]) I as a ﬁnite and 2 × ∩ surjective morphism of degree 12 onto S[2].

Proof. Let q(x0,...,x4) and c(x0,...,x4) be homogeneous quadratic and cubic forms with zero divisors Q and C respectively satisfying Assumption 13.1. Set

d(x0,...,x4,x5) := x5q(x0,...,x4)+ c(x0,...,x4) and let X be the corresponding cubic fourfold in P5. Then X has a single ordinary double point at p := (0:0:0:0:0:1). The Fano variety F (X) of lines on X is birational to S[2], as observed in [Mu1, Example 4.3]. Let F0(X) F (X) be the open subset of lines not passing through p. [2] ⊂ 4 Let A S the the divisor of subschemes y, such that the line ℓ¯y in P is contained in Q. Note that A⊂admits a morphism of degree 3 onto the Fano variety F (Q) of lines on Q, and that the latter is isomorphic to P3. Note also that A admits a morphism

(13.16) φ : A S, → by sending a subscheme y A to the point of ℓ¯ C complementary to y. In fact, φ : A S is ∈ y ∩ → a conic bundle, which is the restriction to S of the following conic bundle φ˜ : A˜ Q. Given a point a Q, let a⊥ be the hyperplane in C5 orthogonal to a with respect to q and→ denote by q ∈ a the non-degenerate quadratic form on a⊥/a induced by q. Then the ﬁber of φ˜ over a Q is the ⊥ ∈ conic in the plane P(a /a) deﬁned by qa, as the latter conic parametrizes lines on Q through [2] a. Let S0 be the complement of A. Let ι : S F (X) be the embedding of S as the singular locus of F (X), sending q S to the line pq through→ p and q. The following is a slightly more detailed version of [Mu1, Example∈ 4.3].

Claim 13.11. There exists a canonical morphism f : S[2] F (X), which restricts to an → isomorphism f : S[2] F (X). Furthermore, f restricts to an isomorphism from Z onto F (C), 0 → 0 80 EYAL MARKMAN which is the inverse of g, and the following diagram is commutative

f S[2] / F (X) O O ∪ ι

A / S. φ

Proof. Let Qˆ and Cˆ be the cones over Q and C given by q and c considered as forms in x0,..., x5. A line on X passes through p, if and only if it is contained in both Qˆ and Cˆ. Indeed, if ℓ 1 passes through p then a general point of ℓ is of the form (sa0 :sa1 :sa2 :sa3 :sa4 :t), (s:t) P , 2 3 ∈ so that d(sa0, sa1, sa2, sa3, sa4,t) = ts q(a0, . . . , a4)+ s c(a0, . . . , a4) vanishes for all (s : t), so that a := (a0 : :a4) is a point of S. Conversely, if ℓ is contained in Qˆ Cˆ, then it must pass through p, since· · · otherwise it would project to a line in S contrary to our∩ assumption that S does not contain any lines. [2] Let H be the hyperplane x5 = 0. Given a point y of S , we get the line ℓ¯y in H intersecting 16 5 S along a subscheme containing y, hence we get the plane Py in P spanned by p and ℓ¯y. Py is not contained in X, since otherwise it would be contained in Qˆ Cˆ, by the above discussion, ∩ and so project to a line in S. If y consists of two distinct points a and b of S, then Py intersects X along three lines, two of them are pa and pb, and we set f(y) to be the third line. If y is non-reduced supported set theoretically on a point a of S, then Py intersects X along 2pa+f(y) for a line f(y) in Py. We claim that f(y) passes through p, if and only if y belongs to A. Indeed, let a = (a0 :a1 :a2 :a3 :a4 :0), b = (b0 :b1 :b2 :b3 :b4 :0), and choose coordinates (s:t:u) for Py via

η(s:t:u)= s(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, 0) + t(b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, 0) + (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, u). Then the cubic form d pulls back to 2q(a, b)ust + 3s2tc(a, a, b) + 3st2c(a, b, b)= st[2q(a, b)u + 3c(a, a, b)s + 3c(a, b, b)t], where the symmetric bilinear form q( , ) is the polarization of q and the symmetric trilinear • • form c( , , ) is that of c. The morphism η maps the line s = 0 to bp, the line t = 0 to ap, and the• line• • cut out by 2q(a, b)u + 3c(a, a, b)s + 3c(a, b, b)t to f(y). Note that q(a, b)=0 if and only if the line ℓy is contained in Q. Now, η(0:0:1) = p, so f(y) passes through p if and only if q(a, b) = 0. A similar argument shows that f(y) passes through p if and only if y belongs to A also in the case where y is non-reduced. The commutativity of the diagram in the statement of the claim follows. If a line ℓ on X is contained in Qˆ, then it is contained in Cˆ and so passes through p. Hence, if a line ℓ on X does not pass through p, then it intersects Qˆ along a length 2 subscheme. ¯ [2] Thus, the projection ℓ of ℓ from p intersects Q along a length 2 subschemeg ˜(ℓ) S0 . We [2] ∈ [2] get a morphismg ˜ : F0(X) S0 , which is clearly the inverse of the restriction of f to S0 . [2] → We conclude that f : S0 F0(X) is an isomorphism. This completes the proof of Claim 13.11. →

16 The scheme ℓ¯y ∩ S is equal to y, if and only if y does not belong to A. If y belongs to A, then y is a proper subscheme of ℓ¯y ∩ S, as the latter is equal to ℓ¯y ∩ C and so has length 3. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 81

The Fano variety of lines F (C) is identified with F (X H). The point p does not belong to X H, and so F (X H) is contained in F (X). The∩ subvariety F (X H) of F (X) is ∩ ∩ 0 ∩ lagrangian, by [Vo1]. Hence, Z :=g ˜(F (X H)) is a lagrangian surface in S[2]. Through a generic point of C pass 6 lines lying on C,∩ by [CG], and the set of lines on C through every [2] point of C is finite, by Assumption 13.1. The fiber of the restriction of π2 to Z S I over a point y S[2] consists of length 2 subschemes of S lying on a line passing through× ∩ one of the two points∈ of y and is hence finite. If y consists of two distinct points a, b through each of which pass exactly 6 lines on C, and such that the line ab does not lie on C, then the fiber of (13.17) π : (Z S[2]) I S[2] 2 × ∩ → over y consists of precisely 12 points, as none of the 12 lines on C through a or b lies on Q, since S does not contain a line. The morphism (13.17) is projective and has finite fibers, hence is a finite morphism (see [Har, Ex. III.11.2]). The morphism (13.17) is clearly surjective. This completes the proof of Lemma 13.10.

13.6. Proof of Proposition 13.2. Let h = c ( (1)) be the class of a hyperplane section of 1 OS S in P4. Let h˜ be the nef class of Pic(S[2]) corresponding to h via (3.10). Let δ Pic(S[2]) be half the class of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes. ∈ Lemma 13.12. (1) The class of the divisor A is [A]= h˜ 2δ. − (2) The pullback via f of (1) is λ := 2h˜ 3δ. OF (X) − (3) If Pic(S)= Zh, then the nef cone of S[2] is λ, h˜ . (4) The restrictions of λ and δ to F (C) are equal.h i Proof. (1) We may and do assume that Pic(S) is cyclic generated by h, as the parts of the lemma not assuming it follow from this case by continuity. The contraction f : S[2] F (X) of the divisor A in Claim 13.11 admits the following modular interpretation. The divisor→ A consists precisely of those subschemes y, such that Iy(1) is not generated by global sections. Indeed, y belongs to A, if and only if ℓ¯y intersects S in a length 3 subscheme. Every hyperplane 0 section of S containing y contains S ℓ¯ , so H (S,I (1)) generates the subsheaf I¯ (1) of ∩ y y ℓy∩S Iy(1). Let M(2, h, 1) be the moduli space of h-stable sheaves on S with Mukai vector (2, h, 1). There is a natural isomophism η : M(1, h, 2) M(2, h, 1), by [Ma1, Theorem 3.21] and the fact that the moduli space M(2, h, 3) is empty.→ M(1, h, 2) parametrizes sheaves of the form [2] Iy(1), where y is a length 2 subscheme of S, and is thus naturally isomorphic to S . The divisor η(A) is precisely the divisor of non-locally-free sheaves in M(2, h, 1), by construction of 0 η. Explicitly, given y A, let ev : H (Iy(1)) C S Iy(1) be the evaluation homomorphism. Then ker(ev) belongs∈ to M(2, h, 2), which is⊗ zeroO dimensional,→ so ker(ev) is isomorphic to the unique rigid and stable vector− bundle E with Mukai vector (2, h, 2). The torsion free sheaf ∗ ∗ − η(Iy(1)) is a subsheaf of E and the quotient E /η(Iy(1)) is supported on the point φ(y) of S complementary to the subscheme y in ℓ¯ S. We get the commutative diagram y ∩ η |A A / P(E∗)

φ S = / S, 82 EYAL MARKMAN where φ is given in (13.16) and the right vertical arrow is the natural projection. The contraction f : S[2] F (X) is identified with the Gieseker-Li morphism from M(2, h, 1) to the normalization of the→ Uhlenbeck-Yau compactification [Li]. Set v := (1, h, 2) and w = (2, h, 1). The divisor A corresponds to the image of the Mukai vector (2, h, 2) in H2(M(w), Z) via the Mukai Hodge ⊥ 2 ⊥ isometry θw : w H (M(w), Z) between the latter and the sublattice w of the Mukai lattice → 2 2 of S orthogonal to w, by [Ma7, Lemma 10.14]. The isometry η∗ : H (M(v), Z) H (M(w), Z) is the image mon(γ) via the parallel-transport representation mon in [Ma8,→ Theorem 1.6] of the isometry γ := D R of the Mukai lattice, where D(r, c, s) = (r, c, s) and R is − ◦ (1,0,1) − (1,0,1) the reflection with respect to the sublattice orthogonal to (1, 0, 1) [Ma1, Theorem 3.21]. Now, ⊥ ⊥ mon(γ) corresponds, via the Mukai isometries θv and θw, to the isometry γ| : v w , which is minus the restriction of the isometry γ. The isometry γ sends v to w− and sends→ the class (2, h, 2) to itself. Hence, the class of A in H2(M(v), Z) is [A]= θ ((2, h, 2)). − v The class of the divisor of non-reduced subschemes in M(v) is 2δ, where δ := θv((1, h, 4)). The nef class h˜ orthogonal to δ, corresponding to the class h H2(S, Z), is h˜ = θ ((0, h, 6)). ∈ v The equality [A]= h˜ 2δ follows. (2), (3) The extremal− rays associated to the two divisorial contractions correspond via the 2 isomorphism H (M(v), Q) H2(M(v), Q), α (α, ), to the rays spanned by the classes [A] and δ (see [Ma7, Cor. 3.6]).→ The nef cone of M7→(v) is• thus dual to the cone generated by the classes [A] and δ. F (X) is a subvariety of Gr(2, 6) and (1) pulls back via f to a nef OGr(2,6) class λ satisfying (λ, λ)=6 and λ is orthogonal to [A]. Hence λ corresponds to θ ((3, h, 0)). − v The equality λ = 2h˜ 3δ follows. The nef cone is thus λ, h˜ . (4) The restriction− of λ and of δ to F (C) are equal,h as λi= 2[A]+ δ and A is disjoint from F (C).

We are ready to prove Proposition 13.2.

Proof. The surface g(F (C)) is smooth and lagrangian, by Lemma 13.10. Let L be the line bundle over S[2] with class λ, so that L = f ∗ (1), by Lemma 13.12. The ampleness of OF (X) the restriction of L to g(F (C)) and Lemma 13.10 imply that the object Φ[2](Lk g ) P ⊗ ∗OF (C) satisfies the three conditions of Lemma 13.8, with = Lk, for all k sufficiently large, and is hence isomorphic to a torsion free reflexive sheaf. L The pair (S[2], g ) is the limit of a flat family of pairs (F (X ), ), where X ∗OF (C) t OF (Xt∩Ht) t is a smooth cubic fourfold and X H is a smooth hyperplane section, as S[2] is the minimal t ∩ t resolution of an A1 singularity along the embedding of S as the singular locus of F (X), by Claim 13.11. Such a flat family is obtained from a flat deformation of F (X) after passage to a double cover of the base of that family, see [Ma6]. (This was the main point of Mukai’s [Mu1, Example 4.3], as remarked in [Mu1, Footnote 38]). The sheaf g thus has a rank 1 cohomological ∗OF (C) obstruction map, by Lemma 7.3 and Example 7.4. Ek has a rank 1 cohomological obstruction map as well, as the property is invariant under derived equivalences. The exact sequence (13.2) is obtained from (13.15), with = Lk, by adding the kernel of L the homomorphism aχ and using the equality of the restrictions to Z = g(F (C)) of δ and of L established in Lemma 13.12. The rank of Fk is 12, by Lemma 13.10. The rank of Ek, for k sufficiently large, is thus 12 + dim H0(Z, (k + 1)) + dim H0(Z, (k)). − OZ OZ VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 83

The multiplication table (6.19) and Lemma 7.1, with (λ, λ) = 6, c = 5/8, and t = 1 as in Example 7.4, yields the third equality below.

2 k 2 χ( Z (k)) = ch( Z ) exp(kλ)tdX = χ( Z )+ [Z]λ + k ch3( Z ))λ O [2] O O 2 [2] [2] O ZS ZS ZS 45k2 45k k(k 1) = 6+ = 6 + 45 − . 2 − 2 2 2 Hence, the rank of Ek, for k sufficiently large, is 45k . It remains to calculate ℓ(Ek) and c1(Ek). The latter is determined by rank(Ek) and the former, by Theorem 6.13(3). Now ℓ( Z ) = (0, λ, 3), by Lemma 7.3, ℓ( Z (k)) = Bkλ(0, λ, 3) = O [2] − [2] [2] O − (0, λ, 6k 3), and ℓ(E ) is the image via Φ =Φχ Φ of ℓ( (k)). Φ acts on the Mukai − k P,χ ◦ P OZ P lattice of S via φ (r, α, s) = (s, α, r). According to [Ta, Prop. 9.3] Φ[2] acts on the LLV P − P lattice of S[2] by H(φ[2]) = det(φ )(B ι(φ ) B ), P P −δ/2 ◦ P ◦ δ/2 where ι(φ ) leaves the class δ H2(S[2]) invariant and acts of δ⊥ by φ via the natural P e ∈ P identification of δ⊥ with the LLV lattice of S. Note that det(φ )= 1, λ = 2h˜ 3δ, (δ/2, λ) = 3, P − − B (0, λ, 6k 3) = (0, λ, 6k), and ι(φ )(0, λ, 6k) = (6k, 2h˜ 3δ, 0). Hence, δ/2 − P − − H(φ[2])(0, λ, 6k 3) = B (6k, 2h˜ 3δ, 0) = (6k, 2h˜ (3 + 3k)δ, 3 (3/2)k). P − − −δ/2 − − − − − − − [2] ∗ [2] ∗ [2] [2] [2] Lete φχ : H (S , Q) H (S , Q) be the automorphism induced by Φχ . Let H(φχ ) : → H(S[2], Q) H(S[2], Q) be the induced isometry via (5.2), which appeared in Lemma 12.1. → [2] [2] [2] e Lemma 12.1 yields the equality H(φχ φP )= R(0,δ,1) H(φP ), and so e e ◦ − ◦ 3 H(φ[2] φ[2])(0, λ,e 6k 1))) = 6k, 2h˜ (3ek 3)δ, 3 k . χ ◦ P − − − − − 2 e Thus, c (E )= 15kh˜ 45k(k−1) δ, by Theorem 6.13(3). 1 k − − 2 ′ ′′ Remark 13.13. Let ak be the restriction of ak to the first direct summand in (13.2) and let ak ′ ′ ′′ ′′ be its restriction to the second direct summand. Then Gk := ker(ak) and Gk := ker(ak) are ′′ ′ saturated subsheaves of Ek and Gk ∼= Gk−1( δ). Let us determine the open subcone of the [2] ′ ′′ − ample cone of S , where Gk and Gk do not slope-destabilize Ek, when Pic(S) is cyclic. In that case the nef cone of S[2] is h,˜ 2h˜ 3δ , by Lemma 13.12. Hence, the class κ := jh˜ δ, j Q, is ample precisely when j >h 2/3 and− everyi rational ample class is a multiple of such− a κ.∈ The [2] normalized κ-slope of a sheaf F on S of positive rank r is µκ(F ) := (κ, c1(F ))/r. The equality

3 κ c1(F ) = 3(κ, κ)(κ, c1(F )) [2] ZS implies that the slope of F is 3(κ, κ)µκ(F ), and is hence proportional to µκ(F ) by a positive constant independent of F . The normalized κ-slopes with respect to κ of the three sheaves are 84 EYAL MARKMAN as follows.

sheaf rank c1 µκ E 45k2 15kh˜ 45k(k−1) δ 2j+k−1 k − − 2 − k G′ 6+ 45k(k+1) 15kh˜ + 6δ −60kj+8 k − 2 − 15k(k+1)−4 G′′ 6+ 45k(k−1) 15(k 1)h˜ + 12 45k(k−1) δ 16−(k−1)[30k+60j] k − 2 − − − 2 15k(k−1)−4 ′ ′′ k+1 The inequality µκ(Gk) >µκ(Gk) holds, for k 2. Hence, for j > 2 and k 2 the normalized ′ ′′ ≥ ≥ κ-slopes µκ(Gk) and µκ(Gk) are smaller than µκ(Ek). Lemma 13.14. We have the short exact sequence

′ ′ η 0 (13.18) 0 G E H (Z, (k)) C [2] ( δ) 0, → k → k → OZ ⊗ OS − → ′ 0 where the homomorphism η is the natural one arising from the isomorphism H (Z, Z (k)) ∼= ∗ ′ [2] O Hom(E , [2] ( δ)) . The sheaf G is isomorphic to the image via Φ of the object k OS − k P.χ ∗ (13.19) (k) [2] [4] C Hom ( (k), [2] [4]) OZ → OS ⊗ OZ OS in degrees 0 and 1. Proof. The exact sequence (13.18) follows from the Snake Lemma and the commutative diagram with short exact rows the second of which is (13.2)

a′ ′ 0 k 0 / G / H (Z, (k + 1)) C [2] / F / 0 k OZ ⊗ OS k id 0 0 0 / Ek / H (Z, Z (k + 1)) C [2] H (Z, Z (k)) C [2] ( δ) / Fk / 0. O ⊗ OS ⊕ O ⊗ OS − ak The exactness of both rows follows from Proposition 13.2. E is isomorphic to Φ[2] ( (k)) k P.χ OZ [2] ′ and [2] ( δ) is isomorphic to Φ ( [2] [4]), by Lemma 13.5. The morphism η is the OS − P.χ OS [2] 0 image via ΦP.χ of the natural morphism in (13.19), where we identify H (Z, Z (k)) and ∗ O Hom ( (k), [2] [4]) via Serre’s duality and the triviality of the canonical line bundle of OZ OS S[2]. Lemma 13.15. We have the exact sequence

′′ ′′ η 0 0 G E H (Z, (k + 1)) C [2] F /F [2] ( δ) 0. → k → k → OZ ⊗ OS → k k−1 ⊗ OS − → ′′ 0 The homomorphism η is the natural one under the identiﬁcation of H (Z, Z (k + 1)) with ∗ O Hom(E , [2] ) . k OS Proof. The exact sequence is obtained via the Snake Lemma after replacing the ﬁrst row in the diagram in Lemma 13.14 by ′′ 0 0 G H (Z, (k)) C [2] ( δ) F [2] ( δ) 0. → k → OZ ⊗ OS − → k−1 ⊗ OS − → VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 85

[2] ′′ The trivial line bundle is isomorphic to ΦP.χ( S[2] ( δ)[4]), by Lemma 13.5. The morphism η [2] O − is the image via ΦP.χ of the natural homomorphism ∗ (k) [2] ( δ)[4] C Hom( (k), [2] ( δ)[4]) , OZ → OS − ⊗ OZ OS − 0 ∗ where we identify H (Z, (k + 1)) with Hom( (k), [2] ( δ)[4]) via Serre’s duality, the OZ OZ OS − triviality of the canonical line bundle of S[2] and Lemma 13.12(4).

References [AC] Arinkin, D., C˘ald˘araru, A.: When is the self-intersection of a subvariety a fibration? Adv. Math. 231 (2012), no. 2, 815–842. [Ba] Bakker, B. A classification of Lagrangian planes in holomorphic symplectic varieties. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 16 (2017), no. 4, 859–877. [Be] Beauville, A.: Varietes Kähleriennes dont la premiere classe de Chern est nulle. J. Diff. Geom. 18, p. 755–782 (1983). [Bec] Beckmann, T.: Derived categories of hyper-Kähler manifolds: extended Mukai vector and integral structure. Preprint, arXiv:2103.13382. [BD] Beauville, A., Donagi, R.: em La variétédes droites d’une hypersurface cubique de dimension 4. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 301 (1985), no. 14, 703–706. [BL] Bakker, B., Lehn, C.: The global moduli theory of symplectic varieties. Preprint arXiv:1812.09748. [BKR] Bridgeland, T., King, A., Reid, M.: The McKay correspondence as an equivalence of derived categories. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), no. 3, 535–554. [BI] Buskin, N., Izadi, E.: Twistor lines in the period domain of complex tori. arXiv:1806.07831. [Br] Bridgeland, T., Fourier-Mukai transforms for elliptic surfaces. J. Reine Angew. Math. 498 (1998), 115– 133. [CBR] Calaque, D., Rossi, C., Van den Bergh, M.: C˘ald˘araru conjecture and Tsygan formality. Ann. of Math. (2) 176 (2012), no. 2, 865–923. [Ca1] C˘ald˘araru, A.: Derived categories of twisted sheaves on Calabi-Yau manifolds. Thesis, Cornell Univ., May 2000. [Ca2] C˘ald˘araru, A.: The Mukai pairing I. The Hochschild structure. Preprint arXiv:0308079v2. [Ca3] C˘ald˘araru, A.: The Mukai pairing II: the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism. Adv. in Math. 194 (2005) 34–66. [Ca4] C˘ald˘araru, A.: Nonfine moduli spaces of sheaves on K3 surfaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002, no. 20, 1027–1056. [CG] Clemens, H.; Griffiths, P.: The intermediate Jacobian of the cubic threefold. Ann. of Math. (2) 95 (1972), 281–356. [CMP] Francois; C., Mongardi, G.; Pacienza, G.: Families of rational curves on holomorphic symplectic varieties and applications to zero-cycles. Preprint arXiv:1907.10970. [DM] Donagi, R., Markman, E.: Spectral covers, algebraically completely integrable Hamiltonian systems, and moduli of bundles. Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme, 1993), 1–119, Lecture Notes in Math., 1620, Springer, Berlin, 1996. [DS] D’Agnolo, A., Schapira, P.: Quantization of complex Lagrangian submanifolds. Adv. Math. 213(1), 358–379 (2007) [F] Ferretti, A.: The Chow ring of double EPW sextics. Algebra Number Theory 6 (2012), no. 3, 539–560. [GHS] Gritsenko, V.; Hulek, K.; Sankaran, G. K.: Moduli spaces of irreducible symplectic manifolds. Compos. Math. 146 (2010), no. 2, 404–434. [GKLR] Green, M., Kim, Y-J., Laza, R., Robles, C.: The LLV decomposition of hyperkähler cohomology. Preprint arXiv:1906.03432. [GLR] Greb, D.; Lehn, C.; Rollenske, S.: Lagrangian fibrations on hyperkähler manifolds?on a question of Beauville. Ann. Sci. Ec.´ Norm. Supér. (4) 46 (2013), no. 3, 375–403 (2013). [Hai] Haiman, M.: Hilbert schemes, polygraphs and the Macdonald positivity conjecture. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), no. 4, 941–1006. 86 EYAL MARKMAN

[Har] Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag 1977. [HSa] Hitchin, N., Sawon, J.: Curvature and characteristic numbers of hyper-Kähler manifolds. Duke Math. J. 106 (2001), no. 3, 599–615. [HSc] Huybrechts, D.; Schröer, S. The Brauer group of analytic K3 surfaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003, no. 50, 2687–2698. [HT] Hassett, B., Tschinkel, Y.: Hodge theory and Lagrangian planes on generalized Kummer fourfolds. Mosc. Math. J. 13 (2013), no. 1, 33–56, 189. [Hua] Huang, S.: A note on a question of Markman. Preprint arXiv.math:2011.10207.v2. [Hu1] Huybrechts, D.: Compact Hyperkähler Manifolds: Basic results. Invent. Math. 135 (1999), no. 1, 63-113 and Erratum: Invent. Math. 152 (2003), no. 1, 209–212. [Hu2] Huybrechts, D.: A global Torelli Theorem for hyperkähler manifolds [after M. Verbitsky]. Séminaire Bourbaki: Vol. 2010/2011. Astérisque No. 348 (2012), Exp. No. 1040, 375–403. [Hu3] Huybrechts, D.: Fourier-Mukai Transforms in Algebraic Geometry. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006. [Hu4] Huybrechts, D.: Compact hyperkähler manifolds. Calabi-Yau manifolds and related geometries (Nord- fjordeid, 2001), 161–225, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2003. [HL] Huybrechts, D., Lehn, M: The geometry of moduli spaces of sheaves. Second edition. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2010. [IM1] Iliev, A., Manivel, L.: Cubic hypersurfaces and integrable systems. Amer. J. Math. 130 (2008), no. 6, 1445–1475. [IM2] Iliev, A., Manivel, L.: Fano manifolds of degree ten and EPW sextics. Annales Scientifiques de l?Ecole´ Normale Supérieure, Elsevier Masson, 2011, 44 (3), pp. 393–426. [Ka] Kapranov, A.: Rozansky-Witten invariants via Atiyah classes. Compositio Math. 115 (1999), no. 1, 71–113. [KM] Knudsen, F., Mumford, D.: The projectivity of the moduli space of stable curves. I. Preliminaries on “det” and ”Div”. Math. Scand. 39 (1976), no. 1, 19?55. [Kr] Krug, A.: Remarks on the derived McKay correspondence for Hilbert schemes of points and tautological bundles. Math. Ann. 371 (2018), no. 1-2, 461–486. [Li] Li, J.: Algebraic geometric interpretation of Donaldson’s polynomial invariants of algebraic surfaces. J. Diff. Geom. 37 (1993), 417–466. [L] Logachev, D.: Fano threefolds of genus 6. Asian J. Math. 16 (2012), no. 3, 515–559. [LL] Looijenga, E., Lunts, V.: A Lie algebra attached to a projective variety. Invent. Math. 129 (1997), no. 2, 361–412. [LLSv] Lehn, C., Lehn, M., Sorger, C., van Straten, D.: Twisted cubics on cubic fourfolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 731 (2017), 87–128. [LSV] Laza, R.; Saccà, G.; Voisin, C.: A hyper-Kähler compactification of the intermediate Jacobian fibration associated with a cubic 4-fold. Acta Math. 218 (2017), no. 1, 55–135. [Ma0] Markman, E.: Integral generators for the cohomology ring of moduli spaces of sheaves over Poisson surfaces. Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 622–646. [Ma1] Markman, E.: Brill-Noether duality for moduli spaces of sheaves on K3 surfaces. J. Algebraic Geom. 10 (2001), no. 4, 623–694. [Ma2] Markman, E.: Integral constraints on the monodromy group of the hyperkähler resolution of a symmetric product of a K3 surface. Internat. J. of Math. 21, (2010), no. 2, 169–223. [Ma3] Markman, E.: A survey of Torelli and monodromy results for holomorphic-symplectic varieties. In “Complex and Differential Geometry”, W. Ebeling et. al. (eds.), Springers Proceedings in Math. 8, (2011), pp 257–323. Available at arXiv:1101.4606. [Ma4] Markman, E.: The Beauville-Bogomolov class as a characteristic class. J. of Algebraic Geometry, 29 (2020) 199–245. [Ma5] Markman, E.: Lagrangian fibrations of holomorphic-symplectic varieties of K3[n]-type. Algebraic and complex geometry, 241?283, Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 71, Springer, 2014. [Ma6] Markman, E.: Modular Galois covers associated to symplectic resolutions of singularities. J. Reine Angew. Math. 644 (2010), 189–220. VECTOR BUNDLES ON A HYPER-KAHLER¨ MANIFOLD WITH A RANK 1 OBSTRUCTION MAP 87

[Ma7] Markman, E.: Prime exceptional divisors on holomorphic symplectic varieties and monodromy reflec- tions. Kyoto J. Math. 53 (2013), no. 2, 345–403. [Ma8] Markman, E.: On the monodromy of moduli spaces of sheaves on K3 surfaces. J. Algebraic Geom. 17 (2008), no. 1, 29–99. [Ma9] Markman, E.: The monodromy of generalized Kummer varieties and algebraic cycles on their intermediate Jacobians. arXiv:1805.11574v3 [Mi] Milne, J.: Etale´ cohomology. Princeton University Press 1980. [Ml] Mladenov, B.: Degeneration of spectral sequences and complex lagrangian submanifolds. Electronic preprint arXiv:1907.04742. [MM] Markman, E., Mehrotra, S.: Integral transforms and deformations of K3 surfaces. Preprint, arXiv:1507.03108. [Mu1] Mukai, S.: Moduli of vector bundles on K3 surfaces and symplectic manifolds. Sugaku Expositions 1 (1988), no. 2, 139?174. [Mu2] Mukai, S.: On the moduli space of bundles on K3 surfaces I, Vector bundles on algebraic varieties, Proc. Bombay Conference, 1984, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies, no. 11, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 341–413. [Mu3] Mukai, S.: Semi-homogeneous vector bundles on an Abelian variety. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 18 (1978), no. 2, 239–272. [N] Nieper-Wißkirchen, M.: On the Chern numbers of generalised Kummer varieties.. Math. Res. Lett. 9 (2002), no. 5-6, 597–606. [O1] O’Grady, K. G.: Irreducible symplectic 4-folds and Eisenbud-Popescu-Walter sextics. Duke Math. J. 134 (2006), no. 1, 99–137. [O2] O’Grady, K.: Modular sheaves on hyperkähler varieties. Preprint arXiv:1912.02659v4. [O3] O’Grady, K.: Desingularized moduli spaces of sheaves on a K3. J. Reine Angew. Math. 512 (1999), 49–117. [O4] O’Grady, K.: Higher-dimensional analogues of K3 surfaces. Current developments in algebraic geometry, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 59 CUP (2012), pp. 257–293. [P] Ploog, D: Equivariant autoequivalences for finite group actions. Adv. Math. 216 (2007), no. 1, 62–74. [Ra] Rapagnetta, A.: On the Beauville form of the known irreducible symplectic varieties. Math. Ann. 340 (2008), no. 1, 77–95. [Sa] Sawon, J.: Rozansky-Witten invariants of hyperkähler manifolds. PhD Thesis, arXiv:0404360. [S] Soldatenkov, A.: On the Hodge structures of compact hyperkähler manifolds. Preprint arXiv:1905.07793. [ST] Seidel, P., Thomas, R.: Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves. Duke Math. J. 108 (2001), no. 1, 37–108. [Ta] Taelman, L.: Derived equivalences of hyperkähler varieties. Preprint arXiv:1906.08081v2. [To] Toda, Y.: Deformations and Fourier-Mukai transforms. J. Differential Geom. 81 (2009), no. 1, 197–224. [Ve0] Verbitsky, M.: Hyperholomorphic bundles over a hyperkähler manifold. arXiv:alg-geom/9307008. [Ve1] Verbitsky, M.: Mirror symmetry for hyper-Kähler manifolds. Mirror symmetry, III (Montreal, PQ, 1995), 115–156, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., 10, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999. [Ve2] Verbitsky, M.: Trianalytic subvarieties of the Hilbert scheme of points on a K3 surface. Geom. Funct. Anal. 8 (1998), no. 4, 732–782. [Ve3] Verbitsky, M.: Cohomology of compact hyper-Kähler manifolds and its applications. Geom. Funct. Anal. 6 (1996), no. 4, 601–611. [Ve4] Verbitsky, M.: Hyperholomorphic bundles over a hyper-Kähler manifold. J. Alg. Geom. 5 (1996), no. 4, 633–669. [Ve5] Verbitsky, M. Hyperholomorphic sheaves and new examples of hyperkaehler manifolds, alg-geom/9712012. In the book: Hyperkähler manifolds, by Kaledin, D. and Verbitsky, M., Mathemat- ical Physics (Somerville), 12. International Press, Somerville, MA, 1999. [Ve6] Verbitsky, M.: Coherent sheaves on general K3 surfaces and Tori. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 4 (2008), no. 3, part 2, 651–714. [Ve7] Verbitsky, M.: A global Torelli theorem for hyperkähler manifolds. Preprint arXiv:0908.4121 v7. 88 EYAL MARKMAN

[Vo1] Voisin, C.: Sur la stabilitédes sous-variétés lagrangiennes des variétés symplectiques holomorphes. Complex projective geometry (Trieste, 1989/Bergen, 1989), 294–303, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 179, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992. [Vo2] Voisin, C.: Hyper-Kähler compactification of the intermediate Jacobian fibration of a cubic fourfold: the twisted case. Local and global methods in algebraic geometry, 341–355, Contemp. Math., 712, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2018. [W] Wieneck, B.: On polarization types of Lagrangian fibrations. Manuscripta Math. 151 (2016), no. 3-4, 305–327.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA Email address: [email protected]