DOCSLIB.ORG

John Adams in the Continental Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Adams in the Continental Congress Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1939 John Adams in the Continental Congress William A. Dehler Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Dehler, William A., "John Adams in the Continental Congress" (1939). Master's Theses. 132. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/132 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1939 William A. Dehler JOHN ADAMS IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS by William A. Dehler, s. J. A THESIS SUBMITTED Il~ PARTIAL FULFILLiv:ENT OF TEE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IH LOYOLA 1J1UVERSITY AUGUST, 1939 VITA AUCTOiiiS William Andrew Dehler, s. J. was born January 24 1 1912 at Terre Eaute, Indiana. He received his elementary education at st. Benedict's Grammar School in that city from September, 1918 to June, 1926. He attended Wiley High School, Terre Haute, for one year. In September, 192'7, he was transferred to the high school division of St. IViarys College, St. Mary's, Kansas, and was graduated in June, 1930. In the fdllowing September, he matricu­ lated in the College of .Arts and Sciences of Notre Dame Univer­ sity. He entered the Novitiate of the Sacred Heart at Milford, Ohio, August 31, 1931, and was enrolled in the College of Arts and Sciences of Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio. In June, 1935, he received the degree of Bachelor of Literature from Xav­ ier University. He was transferred, in September, 1935, to West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, and was registered at the same time as a graduate student of Loyola University in the Department of History. TABIE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I The First Continental Congress 1 Chapter II The Appointment of Washington 18 Chapter III Toward Independence 35 Chapter IV The Declaration of Independence 54 Chapter v Committee Work 69 Chapter VI Character of John Adams 85 Bibliography 100 CHAP'rER I THE FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS Fearing that the Royal Governor would dissolve tl::.eir as­ sembly, the members of the Massachusetts House of Representatives ordered the doors of the chamber t.o be locked, June 17, 1774. They had important business to transact before they adjourned. By an overwhelming majority they voted to send delegates to Phil adelphia to consult with the delegates from the other colonies and to determine nwlse and proper measures ••• for the recovery and establishment of their just rights & liberties, civil and religious, and the restoration of union & harmony between Gre~t Britain and the Colonies.ttl Finally they selected five delegates to represent the colony of Massachusetts and passed a resolution to provide their expense money. Meanwhile tbe Governor's Secretary had brought an order for the dissolution of the House. He did not, however, gain ad­ mlttance, for the assembly confirmed by vote their previous order to keep the doors locked. In vain the Secretary published the proclamation on the stairs leading up to the chamber; the members of the House did not vote to adjourn until they had completed their work.2 Thus ended the last provincial assembly in Massa­ chusetts under the royal prerogative. One of the five delegates chosen was John Adams, a man of 2 thirty-eight years just rising to great prominence as a lawyer. Although he had gained considerable recognition by his formal protest against the Stamp Act before Chief Justice Hutchinson and had refused a lucrative post offered by the royal authorities as an indirect bribe, John Adams was far from being an outstand­ ing patriot leader. With full confidence, however, Samuel Adams and Joseph Hawley had often consulted him in a legal capacity; now they decided to call him to more direct service in the cause of American liberty. This choice was a surprise to John Adams. He had hoped to avoid public affairs. Now that he could reasonably expect his law practice to provide comfortably for his family needs, to sacrifice this professional career even for a time cost him not a little regret.3 A stronger reason for surprise was the con­ sciousness of his own lack of experience. In sharp contrast to his usual vanj_ty, John Adams confessed, ttThis will be an assembly of the wisest men upon the continent ••• I will feel myself unequal to this business. A more extensive knowledge of the realm, the colonies, and of cow~erce, as well as of law and pol­ icy, is necessary, than I am master of.tt4 He regarded the Con­ gress as a "school" and a "nursery of American Statesmen" and regretted that he could not prepare for the forthcoming term by reading points in Law, Politics, and Commerce.5 If only he were not obliged to make his professional circuit through the present state of Maine during the last two months before Congress con- 3 vened, he could review his Law and History, and then he nmight appear with less indecency before a variety of gentlemen, whose educations, travels, experience, family, fortune, and everything" gave them a vast superiority.6 Unfortunately, familiarity breeds contempt; this saner and truer outlook gave way to vain conceit soon after John Adams came in contact with the 11 wisest men upon tb.e continent. u Not w1til 1774 did Adams step out of the narrow confines of New :Sngland. The ride southward to Philadelphia in the com­ pany of his colleagues, Thomas Cushing, Samuel Adams, and Robert Treat Paine, was his first opportunity "to see the world and to form acquaintances with the most eminent and famous menu in the colonies.? With the ovations tendered the delez:sates in Connecticut, John Adams was very much pleased. The reception at lJew Haven excelledin ceremony the treatment accorded a ttGovernor of' a Provincett or a uGeneral of an Army.n A large escort came out to meet them; the people crowded to the doors and windows; bells rang; and cannons boomed out a welcome. Adams properly inter­ preted these respectful attentions as a demonstration of sy~pathy for the suffering province of Massachusetts and of expectation of great results from the Congress.8 Thus the journey was more like a triumph than a trip to the scene of labors. For the most part the people along the route were very :favorably inclined to the meeting of Congress, though Adams thought ttsome persons in 4 Hew York and Philadelphia wanted a little animation.u9 After nineteen days on the road the delegates from Massachusetts were escorted into the city of Philadelphia to the City Tavern.l0 During the next few days they were busy forming acquaintances with the delegates arriving from the other colonies. Before leaving their native province, the Bay Colony delegates had been warned against acting in a manner likely to hiEder the unity and harmony of the Congress. The opinion was somewhat prevalent in the other colonies that uMassachusetts gen­ tlemen ••• do affect to dictate and take the lead in continen­ tal measures" and ''to assume big and haughty airs.u Consequently, Joseph Hawley cautioned the delegates to act with circumspection. Knowing well the particular propensities of John Adams, Hawley assured him that men of. equal ability would represent the other colonies and wa.rned him against giving 11 umbra~:;e, disgust, or affront" to members of Dutch, Scotch, or Irish descent.ll Again at Frankfort, just before their arrival in Philadel­ phia, the four lilassachusetts .delegates received advice from Dr. Rush, ~ifflin, Bay&rd, and other "active sons of liberty" in Philadelphia, vfho had come out to meet them. '.L'he New ::i:nglan.d Tories had spread reports abroad that these four dele3ates were "desperate adventurerstt a::J.d poor men who courted popularity. Since their native colony had felt the chastening rod of England, the Massachusetts delegates were considered tttoo warm, too zeal­ ous, too sanguinett in their opposition to tho Eother Country. 5 Consequently, Dr. Rush and his companions pointed out that under these circumstances Adams and his colleagues must surrender the honor of leading to the delegates from the Old Dominion to whom the other colonies would willingly concede first place in the Congress. John Adams confessed himself deeply impressed by this sound advice and to i~ in later years, attributed the leadership of Virginians during the American Revolution.l2 In Congress a strong prejudice against the Bostonians in­ clined many members to listen to their sentiments with great caution. John Adams and his colleagues were forced to keep them selves "out of sight, and to feel pulses, and to sound the depths to insinuate ••• sentiments, designs, and desires, by means of other persons, sometimes of one province, and sometimes of another."l3 Surely they had a "delicate course to steer between too much activity and too much insensibility" in the critical situation of their province at this time.l4 The Bostonians were so circumspect and cautious that Caesar Rodney spoke of them as more moderate than the delegates from Virginia and the Carolinas, Even Galloway remarked that the Bostonians were very modest "in their Behavior and Conversationu yet "not so much so as not to throw out Hints.ttl5 While John Adams found many of the members "full of pre­ judices and jealousies" which he had not expected, he too was prejudiced and ignorant of other colonies.l6 Willingly, however he sacrificed himself for the sake of the cause.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carnival Time Comes Tonight
    - CARNIVAL TIME COMES TONIGHT FUN FOR ALL AT THE CARNIVAL 500-Driver Shows All Aclamsites To Car Safety Exhibit �N.£ � ii Attencl Gala Affair unusual and interesting exhibit willAn be on display in the auditorium today. It is an all-day program on Finally!! The opportunity many of automobile safety sponsored by the us have been eagerly anticipating is Champion Spark Plug Company. Mr. here. Surely there are many of you Jimmy Reese, who placed seventh in who have always wanted a chance to his first attempt at the 500-mile Me­ throw a pie at Larry Thompson! And morial Day Racing Classic at Indi­ where do you get this golden oppor­ anap0lis, will be program director. tunity? Why at the Senior Carnival, All students of driver education of course! will have access to this program as Tonight, from 7 to 9:30, any Adams well as those students who have student cannot only throw pies at study hall during the day. If at all either Larry Thompson or Ron Co­ possible, students should try to view hen, but they can play miniature goli this program because Mr. Reese, on the stage, throw basketballs in the holder of the third fastest time for gym, or send telegrams to any place the 500-mile track-145.513 m.p.h.­ in the carnival. Students with ro,­ should have a fast moving and sti­ Pie-throwing! Basketball! Get married! These are only samples he mantic inclinations can be married of t mulating program for all drivers. activities can find at tonight's Senior Carnival.
    [Show full text]
  • Richatd Henry Lee 0Az-1Ts4l Although He Is Not Considered the Father of Our Country, Richard Henry Lee in Many Respects Was a Chief Architect of It
    rl Name Class Date , BTocRAPHY Acrtvrry 2 Richatd Henry Lee 0az-1ts4l Although he is not considered the father of our country, Richard Henry Lee in many respects was a chief architect of it. As a member of the Continental Congress, Lee introduced a resolution stating that "These United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States." Lee's resolution led the Congress to commission the Declaration of Independence and forever shaped U.S. history. Lee was born to a wealthy family in Virginia and educated at one of the finest schools in England. Following his return to America, Lee served as a justice of the peace for Westmoreland County, Virginia, in 1757. The following year, he entered Virginia's House of Burgesses. Richard Henry Lee For much of that time, however, Lee was a quiet and almost indifferent member of political connections with Britain be Virginia's state legislature. That changed "totaIIy dissolved." The second called in 1765, when Lee joined Patrick Henry for creating ties with foreign countries. in a spirited debate opposing the Stamp The third resolution called for forming a c Act. Lee also spoke out against the confederation of American colonies. John .o c Townshend Acts and worked establish o to Adams, a deiegate from Massachusetts, o- E committees of correspondence that seconded Lee's resolution. A Declaration o U supported cooperation between American of Independence was quickly drafted. =3 colonies. 6 Loyalty to Uirginia An Active Patriot Despite his support for the o colonies' F When tensions with Britain increased, separation from Britain, Lee cautioned ! o the colonies organized the Continental against a strong national government.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Samuel Adams and Thomas Hutchinson
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-2007 Reputation in Revolutionary America: A Case Study of Samuel Adams and Thomas Hutchinson Elizabeth Claire Anderson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Anderson, Elizabeth Claire, "Reputation in Revolutionary America: A Case Study of Samuel Adams and Thomas Hutchinson" (2007). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1040 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Elizabeth Claire Anderson Bachelor of Arts 9lepu.tation in ~ Unwtica: a ~e studq- oj Samuel a.dartt;., and g fuun.a:, !JtulcIiUu,on 9JetIi~on !lWWuj ~ g~i6, Sp~ 2007 In July 1774, having left British America after serving terms as Lieutenant- Governor and Governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson met with King George III. During the conversation they discussed the treatment Hutchinson received in America: K. In such abuse, Mf H., as you met with, I suppose there must have been personal malevolence as well as party rage? H. It has been my good fortune, Sir, to escape any charge against me in my private character. The attacks have been upon my publick conduct, and for such things as my duty to your Majesty required me to do, and which you have been pleased to approve of.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Comprehension: Declaration of Independence
    Reading Comprehension: Declaration of Independence The main purpose of America's Declaration of Independence was to explain to foreign nations why the colonies had chosen to separate themselves from Great Britain. The Revolutionary War had already begun, and several major battles had already taken place. The American colonies had already cut most major ties to England and had established their own congress, currency, army, and post office. On June 7, 1776, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Richard Henry Lee voiced a resolution that the United States should be completely free of England's influence, and that all political ties between the two countries should be dissolved. Congress agreed and began plans to publish a formal declaration of independence and appointed a committee of five members to draft the declaration. Thomas Jefferson was chosen to draft the letter, which he did in a single day. Four other members—Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams—were part of the committee to help Jefferson. In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson explained that a body of people has a right to change governments if that government becomes oppressive (unfair and controlling). He further explained that governments fail when they no longer have the consent of the governed. Since Parliament clearly lacked the consent of the American colonists to govern them, it was no longer legitimate. The Declaration was presented to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on July 2, 1776. It was approved with a few minor changes. Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, John Hancock, of Massachusetts, was the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Hutchinson: Traitor to Freedom?
    Bound Away: The Liberty Journal of History Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 3 June 2018 Thomas Hutchinson: Traitor to Freedom? Kandy A. Crosby-Hastings Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ljh Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Crosby-Hastings, Kandy A. (2018) "Thomas Hutchinson: Traitor to Freedom?," Bound Away: The Liberty Journal of History: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ljh/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bound Away: The Liberty Journal of History by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas Hutchinson: Traitor to Freedom? Abstract Thomas Hutchinson is perhaps one of the most controversial figures of the American Revolution. His Loyalist bent during a time when patriotism and devotion to the American cause was rampant and respected led to his being the target of raids and protests. His actions, particularly his correspondence to Britain regarding the political actions of Bostonians, caused many to question his motives and his allegiance. The following paper will examine Thomas Hutchinson’s Loyalist beliefs, where they originated, and how they affected his political and everyday life. It will examine Thomas Hutchinson’s role during America’s bid for freedom from the Mother Country. Keywords Thomas Hutchinson, Loyalism, the American Revolution Cover Page Footnote I would like to thank my family for supporting me in my writing endeavors. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Tim H. Blessing Alvernia College Sseptember 21, 1791, Governor
    THE LEWISTOWN RIOTS, 1791-1793: A MICRO-ANALYTIC APPROACH Tim H. Blessing Alvernia College SSeptember 21, 1791, Governor Thomas Mifflin notified the Pennsylvania Assembly of riots in the center of the state so seri- ous that he intended to "exert the Constitutional powers of the Executive" to bring the riots "against the government" [emphasis addedi to an end.' Indicating his belief that he might have to use the force of arms to stop the riots, he also told the legislature that he was "confident ... that any legislative aid [that] may be want- ing ... you will cheerfully and liberally afford." Mifflin's address to the legislature reflected his response to communications received from Judge Thomas Smith of Carlisle (presiding judge of the Fourth Judicial District) regarding a riot against the courts of Mifflin County. These communications apparently were based on a report from Mifflin County's State Attorney, John Clark.2 Clark had reported to Smith that over the course of three days, at least three of the official militias of the county, led by their elected colonels and perhaps a state judge, had attacked the courthouse, harassed officials, attempted a jailbreak, and PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY: A JOURNAL OF MID-ATLANTIC STUDIES, VOL. 7 1, NO. 3, 2004. Copyright © 2004 The Pennsylvania Historical Association PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY eventually brought court proceedings to a halt. Another county militia had, on the second day of the riots, marched into Lewistown (the county seat) with the intention of defending the government and its officials against the other militias. In short, with three or more state militias at bayonet point with each other and with state officials, the governor had every reason to believe that the center of the state was dissolving in chaos and violence.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 Long Has Been Regarded As One of the Decisive Events in Early American History
    THE WHISKEY INSURRECTION: A RE-EVALUATION By JACOB E. COOKE* THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 long has been regarded as one of the decisive events in early American history. But on the question of why it was significant there has been a century and a half of disagreement. Fortunately for the historian, how- ever, there have not been many interpretations; indeed, there have been only two. And, as anyone would guess, these have been the Federalist and the anti-Federalist, the Hamiltonian and the Jeffersonian. It is not the purpose of this paper to describe the fluctuating historical reputations of Jefferson and Hamilton; at one period of time (say, *the Jacksonian era) Jefferson was in the ascendancy; at another time (say, the post-Civil War period) Hamilton crowded Jefferson out of the American historical hall of fame. But for the past half-century and longer, the interpretation that our historians have given to the American past has been predi- cated on a Jeffersonian bias, and the Whiskey Insurrection is no exception. The generally accepted interpretation of the Whiskey Insur- rection reads something like this: In March, 1791, under the prodding of Alexander Hamilton and against the opposition of the Westerners and some Southerners, Congress levied an excise tax on whiskey. This measure was an integral part of Hamilton's financial plan, a plan which was designed to soak the farmer and to spare the rich. There was sporadic opposition to the excise in several parts of the country, but the seat of opposition was in the four western counties of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • David Library of the American Revolution Guide to Microform Holdings
    DAVID LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GUIDE TO MICROFORM HOLDINGS Adams, Samuel (1722-1803). Papers, 1635-1826. 5 reels. Includes papers and correspondence of the Massachusetts patriot, organizer of resistance to British rule, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Revolutionary statesman. Includes calendar on final reel. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 674] Adams, Dr. Samuel. Diaries, 1758-1819. 2 reels. Diaries, letters, and anatomy commonplace book of the Massachusetts physician who served in the Continental Artillery during the Revolution. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 380] Alexander, William (1726-1783). Selected papers, 1767-1782. 1 reel. William Alexander, also known as “Lord Sterling,” first served as colonel of the 1st NJ Regiment. In 1776 he was appointed brigadier general and took command of the defense of New York City as well as serving as an advisor to General Washington. He was promoted to major- general in 1777. Papers consist of correspondence, military orders and reports, and bulletins to the Continental Congress. Originals are in the New York Historical Society. [FILM 404] American Army (Continental, militia, volunteer). See: United States. National Archives. Compiled Service Records of Soldiers Who Served in the American Army During the Revolutionary War. United States. National Archives. General Index to the Compiled Military Service Records of Revolutionary War Soldiers. United States. National Archives. Records of the Adjutant General’s Office. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty and Warrant Application Files. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Rolls. 1775-1783. American Periodicals Series I. 33 reels. Accompanied by a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Pen & Parchment: the Continental Congress
    Adams National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior PEN & PARCHMENT INDEX 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 a Letter to Teacher a Themes, Goals, Objectives, and Program Description a Resources & Worksheets a Pre-Visit Materials a Post Visit Mterialss a Student Bibliography a Logistics a Directions a Other Places to Visit a Program Evaluation Dear Teacher, Adams National Historical Park is a unique setting where history comes to life. Our school pro- grams actively engage students in their own exciting and enriching learning process. We hope that stu- dents participating in this program will come to realize that communication, cooperation, sacrifice, and determination are necessary components in seeking justice and liberty. The American Revolution was one of the most daring popular movements in modern history. The Colonists were challenging one of the most powerful nations in the world. The Colonists had to decide whether to join other Patriots in the movement for independence or remain loyal to the King. It became a necessity for those that supported independence to find ways to help America win its war with Great Britain. To make the experiment of representative government work it was up to each citi- zen to determine the guiding principles for the new nation and communicate these beliefs to those chosen to speak for them at the Continental Congress. Those chosen to serve in the fledgling govern- ment had to use great statesmanship to follow the directions of those they represented while still find- ing common ground to unify the disparate colonies in a time of crisis. This symbiotic relationship between the people and those who represented them was perhaps best described by John Adams in a letter that he wrote from the Continental Congress to Abigail in 1774.
    [Show full text]
  • The Articles of Confederation Creating A
    THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION During the American Revolution, Americans drafted the Articles of Confederation to set up a new government independent of Britain. The Articles served as the constitution of the United States until 1789, when a new constitution was adopted. In the years leading up to the American Revolution, tension grew between the colonists and Britain. In 1765, 27 delegates from nine colonies met to oppose legislation passed by Parliament imposing a stamp tax on trade items. The delegates to the Stamp Act Congress drew up a statement of rights and grievances and agreed to stop importing goods from Britain. Parliament repealed the Stamp Tax Act. But it continued to impose new taxes on the colonies, and hostility to Britain kept growing. In 1773, some colonists protested a tax on tea by dressing up as Indians, boarding three British ships, and dumping their cargo of tea into the harbor. In response to the Boston Tea Party, Britain closed the Port of Boston. In turn, colonists convened the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia in September 1774. There was significant disagreement among the delegates. Many had supported efforts to repeal the offensive laws, but had no desire for independence. Even after battles broke out at Lexington and Concord in 1775 and the colonies began assembling troops to fight the British, many delegates remained loyal to the king. John Hewes, a delegate from North Carolina wrote in July 1775: “We do not want to be independent; we want no revolution . we are loyal subjects to our present most gracious Sovereign.” Many delegates felt a strong sense of loyalty to the Empire.
    [Show full text]