Integrated Statewide Network of Optional Express Toll Lanes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Statewide Network of Optional Express Toll Lanes Integrated Statewide Network Maryland’s Statewide of Optional Express Toll Lanes Express Toll Lanes Network Initiative Vision Maryland’s Statewide Express Toll Lanes (ETLs) Network Initiative will: • Provide a new type of optional transportation service with reliable, relatively free-fl owing travel for time-sensitive trips; • Provide a sustainable solution and long-term • Create infrastructure for regional express bus congestion relief; and service in the busiest commuting routes; • Make billions of dollars of congestion relief • Provide increased roadway capacity in the affordable decades sooner than traditional most severely congested transportation corridors; approaches would allow. Objectives • Offer reliable and predictable travel operational strategies that maximize times and choices by providing relatively sustainable transit and motorist movements A network of optional express toll free-fl owing travel options for transit riders and on a system-wide basis and that also would lanes will provide a cost-effective automobile occupants in the near term, not connect seamlessly to neighboring jurisdictions way for Maryland to manage way off in the future, while maintaining free in the region. congestion, increase roadway lanes for less time-sensitive trips. • Capture air quality and other capacity, create an expanded • Promote transit solutions by providing the environmental benefi ts by reducing vehicle regional transit system, infrastructure for a reliable system of express emissions and lessening the need for future bus routes as well as fi nancial incentives (e.g., highway widening and associated impacts and provide an option for splitting automobile operation costs, parking, on residences, businesses, and the natural relatively free-fl owing and tolls) to carpool and vanpool. environment. highway travel – and to • Build sustainable highway capacity • Improve incidence response times by do so decades sooner sooner than otherwise feasible by reducing congestion and providing adjacent than otherwise providing a new revenue source in the form of routing for emergency vehicles. feasible. tolls and using pricing techniques to manage • Take advantage of technological demand. (Revenue would fi rst be used for advances, including collecting tolls 100% maintenance and operation costs on the new electronically, without tollbooths or waits lanes with excess revenue used for capital costs – and to adjust tolls on a real-time basis to to build and maintain the network.) manage traffi c fl ow. • Develop an integrated highway system that optimizes effi ciency and maximizes fl exibility by pursuing construction and Statewide Express Toll Lanes Network Winter 2005 140 FREDERICK 97 LEGEND Express toll lanes (ETLs) will be considered where Example of express toll lanes operational in Minnesota. 26 BALTIMORE they can help ease the impact of congestion Express Toll Lane Facilities/Corridors in Design by making transportation improvements 6 1 I-95 from I-895 to north of MD 43 (10 miles) (Construction - late 2006) affordable decades sooner. The primary focus FREDERICK 1 95 of the Statewide Express Toll Lanes Network 695 2 Intercounty Connector (Entire Length) Initiative is to add new lanes to some of 26 7 40 Maryland’s most severely congested controlled 43 Express Toll Lane Facilities/Corridors in Project Planning 70 32 access highways such as Interstates. 140 83 1 3 I-95/ I-495 (Capital Beltway) – Entire Maryland portion (42.2 miles) Express toll lanes are actively under consideration 4 I-270 from I-370 to I-70 (23 mile section) Working in concert with Governor Ehrlich’s 15 BALTIMORE 5 MD 5 from I-495 to US 301 (9.4 miles) in the Baltimore and Washington regions, Vision for a More Mobile Maryland, 70 270 27 97 702 KENT 301 including for I-95, I-270, I-495/I-95, and MD 5 development of an Express Toll Lanes Network 40 6 I-95 from north of MD 43 to MD 543 (10 miles) 40 395 (see map for details on the status of plans for will help ease the burden of congestion in the HOWARD 213 individual ETL facilities). State’s most traveled corridors. 4 95 Express Toll Lane Facilities/Corridors Under Feasibility Study 100 895 7 I-695 from I-95N to I-97 10 29 95 695 8 I-270 from I-495 to I-370 32 295 97 Example of express toll lanes on I-15 MONTGOMERY 10 Proposed Regional Variable Priced Lanes Scenario, 2030 in San Diego, California. for the TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study 11 100 GAITHERSBURG 370 2 9 The entire Capital Beltway (I-495/I-95) 14 100 QUEEN 8 ANNE 10 I-270 from I-70 to the Capital Beltway (I-495) 7 97 1 32 11 I-95 from the Capital Beltway (I-495) to the Baltimore Beltway (I-695) ROCKVILLE ANNE'S12 US 50 from the Chesapeake Bay Bridge to I-395 29 13 270 295 MD 5 from I-495 to US 301 95 301 25 14 Intercounty Connector (Entire Length) 28 9 SILVER COLLEGE 97 15 I-295 from Capital Beltway to Anacostia Freeway SPRING PARK BOWIE 213 16 Anacostia Freeway/KenilworthCAROLINE Avenue from I-295 to Route 50 15 ARUNDEL301 50 7 ANNAPOLIS 301 17 I-95 from Caroline/Spotsylvania County Line to Capital Beltway (I-495/I-95) 12 50 23 WASHINGTON 50 18 I-395 from the Capital Beltway (I-495/I-95) to I-295 24 16 19 MD 4 from US 301 to I-495 29 D.C. 1 50 26 30 95 20 MD 210 from MD 228 to I-495 35 295 50 21 US 301 from the Nice Bridge to US 50 (includes the proposed Waldorf Bypass) Optional Express Toll Lanes 66 34 495 28 22 I-66 from Warren/Fauquier County Line, over the Theodore Roosevelt Bridge, 50 31 E 66 32 33 to Rock Creek Parkway to Independence Avenue, to Maine Avenue, 395 • Express toll lanes will use added • Tolls will be collected 100 percent C SW to SE/SW Freeway 495 18 4 TALBOT lanes (in some instances, in electronically at highway speeds. 28 3 N19 23 Dulles Toll Road (VA 267) from VA 28 to I-66 combination with creating new 22 495 95 I MAP AREA EASTON 24 VA 28 from I-66 to VA 7 • Relatively free-fl owing conditions 5 options with converted lanes) to R 301 25 VA 7 from US Route 15 to the Dulles Toll Road will be maintained by varying toll 20 major highways such as Interstates. 27 5 26 Fairfax County Parkway from I-66 to VA 7 rates based on demand – either P 27 Franconia-Springfield Parkway from Sydenstricker Road to Frontier Drive • Express toll lanes will give motorists by time of day or actual traffi c 17 13 28 Braddock Road from Burke Lake Road to I-95 the option of paying a fee to drive conditions – increasing when 1 in separate, relatively free-fl owing the lanes are relatively full and 29 Chain Bridge highway lanes whenever they decreasing when the lanes have 4 30 Key Bridge CA need it most. extra capacity. 228 31 Memorial Bridge 95 210 50 32 South Capitol Street Bridge (Frederick Douglass Bridge) • Options will be preserved for toll- 33 Pennsylvania Avenue Bridge (John Phillip Sousa Bridge) free travel in general purpose lanes LVE 34 East Capitol Street Bridge (Whitney Young Memorial Bridge) for less time-sensitive trips. 21 CAMBRIDGE 35 Benning Road Bridge 301 CHARLES R.
Recommended publications
  • 1542‐1550 First Street, Sw Design Review
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW 1542‐1550 FIRST STREET, SW DESIGN REVIEW WASHINGTON, DC August 4, 2017 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 17-13 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.17-13 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.17A Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC
    1 Reimagining DC 295 as a vital multi modal corridor: The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC Jonathan L. Bush A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Howard Ways, AICP Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes, M.Arch © Copyright 2017 by Jonathan L. Bush All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT Cities across the globe are making the case for highway removal. Highway removal provides alternative land uses, reconnects citizens and natural landscapes separated by the highway, creates mobility options, and serves as a health equity tool. This Capstone studies DC 295 in Washington, DC and examines the cases of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway, Milwaukee’s Park East Freeway, New York City’s Sheridan Expressway and Seoul, South Korea’s Cheonggyecheon Highway. This study traces the history and the highway removal success using archival sources, news circulars, planning documents, and relevant academic research. This Capstone seeks to provide a platform in favor DC 295 highway removal. 3 KEYWORDS Anacostia, Anacostia Freeway, Anacostia River, DC 295, Highway Removal, I-295, Kenilworth Avenue, Neighborhood Planning, Southeast Washington DC, Transportation Planning, Urban Infrastructure RESEARCH QUESTIONS o How can Washington’s DC 295 infrastructure be modified to better serve local neighborhoods? o What opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Congestion Analysis Report for the Baltimore Region Top 10
    Quarterly Congestion Analysis Report for the Baltimore Region Top 10 Bottleneck Locations 2nd Quarter 2018 Table of Contents About the region .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 How bottleneck conditions are tracked .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Maps Defined ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Top 10 Bottleneck Map .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Top 10 Bottleneck List ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 #1-10 Ranked Bottlenecks with Maps, Timeline, Traffic Counts and Notes .......................................................................................................................... 8-27 Speed Maps for the Baltimore Region (AM and PM Peak) ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Final Report
    I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study - FINAL REPORT- Presented to: Submitted By: September 2015 Cover Letter Tollway Towers North, Suite 870 15770 North Dallas Parkway Ali K. Soroush, Ph.D. Dallas, TX 75248 Project Manager Tel: 214-245-5300 [email protected] Fax: 214-889-5049 Date: September 23, 2015 To: Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. Program Manager Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships Virginia Department of Transportation Subject: I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Final Report Dear Mr. Farajian, C&M Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the Final Report of the I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study. This report presents an overview of the proposed project, an assessment of existing traffic conditions and socioeconomic data in the project area, and an overview of field data collection and analyses. The report also presents details regarding the modeling approach, methodology, and, most importantly, the traffic and revenue forecast. The C&M project team expresses its sincere gratitude to VDOT for providing the opportunity to participate in this project. Respectfully, Carlos M. Contreras, MBA Ali Soroush, Ph.D. President Project Manager I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Prepared For: By: Final Report September 2015 Disclaimer The results of this study constitute the opinion of C&M with respect to the tolled facility’s future traffic and revenue. The traffic and revenue projections provided in this report were developed based on standard professional practices and the information available at the time the study was executed, subject to the time and budget constraints of the study’s scope of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowie Washington Clinton Oxon Hill Camp Springs
    503 Z7 to/from Laurel to/from Columbia 409 Z2 to/from Olney C8 to/from White Flint to/from Elkridge Z11 to/from Laurel Racetrack Burtonsville Park & Ride Montgomery 295 St 302 Main St Z6 Sandy Spring Rd 89M WESTFARM to/from Burtonsville/ RTA provides local service Castle Blvd Z7 Old Sandy 87 Z2 Z7 to/from throughout Central Maryland, Spring Rd Z8 Z6 Paul S. Sarbanes Transit Center to/from Greencastle/Briggs Chaney (Silver Spring m ) Sweitzer Ln including Laurel. 503 COLUMBIA PIKE 302 Gorman Ave 5th St WHITE OAK 409 K6 Industrial Intercounty Connector Van Dusen Rd 87 Pkwy CALVERTON 141 89 89M 89 Laurel Tech Broadbirch Dr 141 to/from Rd Galway Dr Gaithersburg Park & Ride Calverton Blvd Laurel 301 Washington Blvd Van Dusen Rd Fort Meade Rd B30 Z6 Z7 Regional Z7 302 LAUREL Baltimore-Washingtonto/from Pkwy BWI Airport via Arundel Mills Z7 502 Hospital Ashford 4th St LOCKWOOD DR Blvd 502 to/from Arundel Mills Z11 K9 R2 Beltsville Dr 87 C8 FDA Cherry Ln Z2 C8 Red Clay Rd PATUXENT RIVER Plum Orchard Dr Towne Centre 502 Old Z8 Mulberry St Laurel 87 Annapolis Rd Broadbirch Dr Broadbirch R2 Z6 95 301 White Oak Cherry Hill Rd 89 Cherry Ln Adventist St Cypress 302 502 89M Laurel-Bowie Federal Medical Center 87 Z7 Rd Research South Laurel NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE AmmendaleVirginia Rd B30 Muirkirk Park & Ride Center 86 Manor Ritz Way Baltimore Ave COLUMBIA PIKE Rd Rd Z7 Centerpark Powder Mill Rd Laurel-Bowie Rd89M 87 Office Park Contee Rd 301 89 Z2, Z6, Z7, Z8, Z11 to/from Powder Mill Rd Muirkirk Rd 89M Muirkirk Paul S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Capital Beltway and Its Impact on Industrial and Multi-Family Expansion in Virginia JULIA A
    The Washington Capital Beltway and Its Impact on Industrial and Multi-Family Expansion in Virginia JULIA A. CONNALLY and CHARLES O. MEIBURG, Bureau of Population and Economic Research, University of Virginia This paper reports on the impact of the Washington Capital Beltway on industrial and multi-family expansion in Northern Virginia. Between 1960 and 1965 industrial employment grew 71 percent, primarily because of the many industries which located near the Beltway. Interviews with 48 industry execu­ tives indicated that access to the circumferential was a sig­ nificant factor in their location decision. The wholesale­ distribution and research and development firms gave the greatest weight to accessibility to the Beltway. As well as promoting industrial growth, the Beltway has altered the com­ muting patterns of the industrial workers. One-half of 2, 100 employees surveyed used the circumferential to commute. The Beltway has expanded the labor market to include Maryland and a much larger section of Northern Virginia. The Beltway area also spawned more than 3, 000 new apartment units be­ tween 1964 and 1966. Like the industrial workers, 50 percent of the apartment residents commute via the Beltway, but their travel pattern is quite different. The large majority are em­ ployed in the District and Arlington County; only a few work in nearby industries. The implications of the study include the continued growth of industrial and multi-family development in the Beltway area, resulting in increased traffic on both the radials and the Beltway, with the greatest pressure occurring at the interchanges. The study concludes with an approach toward the control of land development in interchange areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT
    MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Status Report DATE: November 9, 2017 Status Report 1. Purchase of Road Deicing Salt The Public Works Department has located a contract for the purchase of road deicing salt with Montgomery County (IFB# 1041647) through two (2) vendors, upon which we will be able to piggyback. The current price for salt with Morton Salt, Inc. (Primary Vendor) is $68.12/ton and we intend to purchase up to 1,460 tons as needed this winter. We will sign a contract and issue a purchase order to Morton Salt, Inc. in the amount of $99,455.20. This is within the amount budgeted for FY18 in the Public Works Streets Operating Supplies Account. The current price for salt with Eastern Salt Co., Inc. (Secondary Vendor) is $77.10/ton. We will sign a contract and issue a purchase order to Eastern Salt Co., Inc. in the amount of $10,000. As provided for in the Montgomery County Contract, the Secondary Vendor would serve only as a backup salt supplier should the Primary Vendor be unable to fulfill a required order. As provided in Section 62 of the City Charter, this will serve as the required seven (7) day notice of intent to purchase. 2. Economic Development Committee (EDC)) The EDC held their regular meeting Wednesday and heard a briefing on the Prince George’s County Competitive Retail Market Strategic Action Plan given by Derick Berlage from MNCPPC and Larry Hentz from the County EDC. One of the ways the Plan is implemented is through a targeted effort to recruit grocery stores, high-quality restaurants, and women’s apparel stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater H Street NE Heritage Trail: Heritage Trail
    On this self-guided walking Hub, Home, tour of Greater H Street, historical markers lead you to: Heart – Swampoodle, whose residents helped build the Capitol GREATER H STREET NE and the White House. HERITAGE TRAIL – The route British forces marched on their way to burn the Capitol and White House. – Gallaudet University, recognized as the center of American Deaf Culture. – Trinidad rowhouses, built on a former brickyard and baseball field. – The small brick storefronts where hundreds of immigrant families got their toe-hold in Washington. – Union Terminal Market, purveyor to the city. – The arena where the Beatles performed their first U.S. concert and Malcolm X spoke. – The performing arts center that is spurring the neighborhood’s most recent renewal. A bustling, working-class neighborhood grew up here alongside the railroad and streetcar. Mom-and-pop businesses served all comers in the city’s leading African American shopping district. Discover how, even aἀer the devastating 1968 civil disturbances, the strong community prevailed to witness H Street’s 21st-century revival. Welcome. In 2005 the Atlas Performing Arts Center opened in a renovated Atlas movie theater. Restaurants and clubs followed, and a new chapter began for the long-neglected H Street, NE, commercial corridor. What stories do these old brick storefronts hold? Follow Hub, Home, Heart: Greater H Street, NE Heritage Trail to meet the entrepreneurial families who lived and ran businesses here. Along the way, learn how the neighborhood became an important transportation hub and a bustling, working-class community. This eepsakek guide summarizes the 18 signs of the city’s 13th Official Walking Tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward 7 Heritage Guide
    WARD 7 HERITAGE GUIDE A Discussion of Ward 7 Cultural and Heritage Resources Ward 7 Heritage Guide Text by Patsy M. Fletcher, DC Historic Preservation Office Design by Kim Elliott, DC Historic Preservation Office Published 2013 Unless stated otherwise, photographs and images are from the DC Office of Planning collection. This project has been funded in part by U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund grant funds, administered by the District of Columbia’s Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Depart- ment of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Department of the Interior. This program has received Federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the District of Columbia. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its Federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • DC Circulatort National Mall Service G St G St GALLERY
    BROOKLAND / NORTHEAST Lowell St PARKRD Monro Pl Monroe St Lawrence St t n St ray e roe St rto Lu t St Mo Av St St e t S St St le St t Mon nt S St Lamont St o r m Lawrence St d y th La h th Irving St M t Oa h Kearny St h t n th S nt St t Lamo t k Pine S St 38 Pl n m S 13 ckso 7 Kilbou Keefer Ja 6 l t rne Pl 18 22 24 E 1 Mt W 1 Klingle Pl Co Kenyon St a 35 r t Pleas Kenyon St St d S St t h St e M nnec th Cathedral Ave Irving St Trinity ng St h S Irving St r Irvi t COLUMBIA th t i S l t ls 5 t E National Zoo 20 a a t S 2 26 S t nt t r HEIGHTS A t l College t 32nd S S C St h WOODLEY St P mlin h v S ia Rd Ha S e Gareld St t mb t l St St Colu rt Pl 010.5 Miles e h ba h h n St tic Ho 7 t Colmar t t 6 Hamlin St h t th Harvard St 0 r t Cle 1 4 1 5 5 h th 3 a PARK t t t 7 1 l tson Pl t 1 G 38 ut St S Girard St A h S ve 2 t St Michigan Ave Y 29 v e 27 S Manor Park Wa h la h o e St Harvard St Dr Rd t o t s th St th nd h h a S t 5t 6 rg Franklin St c t P Fulton St Wood WOODLEY Franklin St h 36 A 0 35 ley Rd ea l t R t McMillan ve B umbi Girard St i Pl l 2 3th ive a St 8 S Anacostia St 1 PARK Co t 1 r Edmunds St nier A e vie S Evarts St v Evarts St th Howard nd v Reservoir th La Fairmont St A w h Buses run every 10 minutes on the following schedule: e D t d t a S River Stream 14 22 r g 28 o S University Davis Pl Tu Davis St t St d t ver o t u Cal Calvert St 16 h Douglas St Douglas St S h Euclid St t R S a C t S e n Ave r t h t h k 7t S Valley Park r a r law t a S 2 m 1 Wi S n D Calvert St Rd Clifton St Channing St g o S nd 4 Channing St 6 n Biltmore St d Channing St Y l in a 41st 18 a t in t B n h t 6 h n k n o 42 Rd r g l o o sc ri y t t RHODE w S o th 2 an i S Rd S U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's Interstate and Beltway Mileage
    BALTIMORE BELTWAY MILEAGE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020 Total County Route Begin Description End Description Mileage Anne Arundel IS 695 East of IS 97 Baltimore County Line 2.920 Baltimore IS 695 Anne Arundel County Line MD 695 East of IS 95 27.590 Baltimore IS 83 IS 695 IS 695 1.520 Baltimore MD 695 IS 695 East of IS 95 Baltimore City Line @ Francis Scott Key Bridge 13.660 Baltimore City MD 695 Baltimore County Line Anne Arundel County Line 3.336 Anne Arundel MD 695 Baltimore City Line IS 695 East of IS 97 2.480 Baltimore Beltway Mileage 51.506 MARYLAND'S CAPITAL BELTWAY MILEAGE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020 Total County Route Begin Description End Description Mileage Prince George's IS 95 Virginia State Line IS 495 26.110 Prince George's IS 495 Montgomery County Line IS 95 1.750 Montgomery IS 495 Virginia State Line Prince George's County Line 14.380 Maryland's Capital Belway Mileage 42.240 The Maryland Department of Transportation - State Highway Administration, Data Services Division, MARYLAND'S INTERSTATE SYSTEM AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020 The following Interstate Highways are Maintained by the Maryland Department of Transportation - State Highway Administration. Route Description Miles IS 68 West Virginia State Line to IS 70 80.680 IS 70 Pennsylvania State Line to Baltimore City Line 91.710 IS 81 West Virginia State to Pennsylvania State Line 12.080 IS 83 Baltimore City Line to Pennsylvania State Line 27.800 IS 95 Virginia State Line to Southwestern Baltimore City Line (Including IS 95X) 50.270 IS 97 US 50/301 (IS 595) to IS 695 at IS 895A 17.620 IS 195 BWI Airport to MD 166 4.350 IS 270 IS 495 to IS 70 (Including IS 270-Y) 34.695 IS 295 IS 95 to Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • I-495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION Virginia Department of Transportation
    I-495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION Virginia Department of Transportation Cooper Middle School PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING 977 Balls Hill Rd., McLean, Va. June 11, 2018 Agenda § Welcome and introductions § Project background § About the study § Scope of the study § Agency stakeholder coordination § Project website § Schedule § Questions and feedback Virginia Department of Transportation 2 Project Background I-495 Express Lanes History § Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision issued by FHWA – June 2006 § Included Express Lanes improvements to George Washington Memorial Parkway § Environmental document (NEPA) reevaluations completed § May 2007 (revised IJR project limits to south § May 2009 of Old Dominion Drive) § July 2009 § June 2008 § Dulles Interchange November 2009 § December 2008 § Express Lanes and Dulles Interchange open to traffic November 2012 § I-495 North Shoulder Lane Use Project (1½ mile Express Lanes merge to GW Parkway) § Study completed June 2014, Open to traffic June 2015 Virginia Department of Transportation 3 Project Background Existing Conditions § I-495 congestion routinely extends between American Legion Bridge and Tysons (south of Dulles Toll Road) § Multiple hours of congestion during AM and PM peak periods and weekends § Cut-through traffic using local roads and residential streets on either side of I-495 Virginia Department of Transportation 4 Project Background Northern Virginia Express Lanes Network § 90+ mile express lanes network by late 2022 § 54 miles in service § I-95, I-495, I-66 Inside the Beltway § 31 miles under construction § I-395 Northern Extension, I-66 Outside the Beltway § 10 miles in development § I-95 to Fredericksburg § 3 miles under study § I-495 Northern Extension § Three individual operators Virginia Department of Transportation 5 About the Study Potential Express Lanes Access Dulles Toll Road (VA Route 267) at I-495 Existing Express Lane Access New Express Lane Access To Be Studied 495 South to Rt.
    [Show full text]