DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practices for Product Metadata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Best Practices for Product Metadata Guide for North American Data Senders and Receivers June 1, 2015 FEATURES Updated to provide more ONIX 3.0 examples & guidelines Reflects the changing requirements of publishers & booksellers Covers both US & Canadian markets Includes best practices for both senders & receivers Developed in cooperation with BookNet Canada Metadata Best Practices Best Practices for Product Metadata Guide for North American Data Senders and Receivers JUNE 1, 2015 Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 2 Metadata Best Practices Best Practices for Product Metadata: Guide for North American Data Senders and Receivers was written and compiled for the Book Industry Study Group, Inc. (BISG) and BookNet Canada by the BISG Metadata Committee, with additional material provided by Renée Register of DataCurate. Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015 Book Industry Study Group, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is based on Product Metadata Best Practices for Data Senders and Product Metadata Best Practices for Data Recipients, which in turn were partially based on The Canadian Bibliographic Standard published by BookNet Canada. Representatives of BookNet Canada were represented on the BISG Metadata Committee throughout the development of this document. Grateful acknowledgement is made to BookNet Canada for the right to use and adapt their materials. All references to ONIX data elements are taken from: ONIX for Books Product Information Message, Product Record Format, Release 2.1, Revision 02, © 2004; ONIX for Books Product Information Format Specifcation Release 3.0.1, © 2012 and Release 3.0.2, © 2014; ONIX for Books Implementation and Best Practice Guide © 2011-2014; and ONIX Code Lists, Issue 21, © April 2013, and Issue 24, ©. January 2014. Each of these documents is provided by EDItEUR Limited, and we gratefully acknowledge their permission to use eXcerpts from this material. Layout and cover design by Paige Poe, Augment Digital Workshop Copyedited by Patricia Fogarty Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 3 Metadata Best Practices Preface 6 General Technical Guidelines and Best Practices 7 Product Record 1. Product Identifer 9 2. Barcode Indicator 14 Product Description (Block 1) 3. Product Form / Format (including Product Form Detail[s]) 17 4. Weight and Dimensions (Measure) 22 5. Country of Manufacture 25 6. Digital Rights Management (DRM)/Usage Constraints /digital product license 27 7. Product Parts / Number of Pieces 32 8. Collections: Series, Sets, and Bundles 36 9. Title 55 10. Contributor 74 11. Contributor Biography 87 12. Contributor Country Code / Region Code 89 13. Edition Information 93 14. Language(s) of Product Content 99 15. Page Count, Running Time, and EXtent 103 16. Subjects 107 17. Intended Audience for Product (Including Age Range) 115 18. Leveling / compleXity 121 Marketing Collateral Detail (Block 2) 19. TeXtual Description of Content 126 Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 4 Metadata Best Practices 20. Digital Image of Product 140 21. Prizes 149 Content Detail (Block 3) 22. Content Details 154 Publishing Detail (Block 4) 23. Publisher / Imprint / Brand Name 156 24. Global Publishing Status 163 25. Global Publication Date and Other Publishing Dates 169 26. Strict On Sale Date / Embargo Date 176 27. Global Sales Rights / Territorial Rights 178 Related Material (Block 5) 28. Related Products and works 192 Product Supply (Block 6) 29. Markets 197 30. Distributor / Vendor of Record 199 31. Return Code 206 32. Product Availability Code 209 33. Case Pack / Carton Quantity 215 34. Price 217 35. Publisher’s Proprietary Discount Code 224 Appendix A: General Recommendations for Data Recipients 227 Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 5 Metadata Best Practices PREFACE Since the publication of the frst edition of BISG’s Product Metadata Best Practices in 2005, we have seen unprecedented changes in the businesses of publishing and bookselling. Although ebooks had been around for several years at the time of the frst edition, they had still not had a signifcant effect on the trade book publishing business or the trade bookselling business. As we all know, that is no longer the case. Print books still make up the majority of books sold in the world, but in some subject areas (e.g., reference works) they are no longer the primary form in which content is published. Ebook sales grow each year, and as they grow many long-standing business practices change. Although we do not eXpect print books to stop being published any time soon, the day is approaching when referring to a particularly lengthy book as a “doorstop” will seem quaint. These updated best practices take into account the changing landscape of publishing and bookselling. They are designed to be applicable to the hybrid print and digital world in which we do business today. As was the case with the frst edition of these best practice guidelines, much of the guidance we give applies regardless of the format in which a book is published. We have, however, made every effort to refect the current state of digital workfows, and we will update these best practices frequently in order to keep them relevant to the changing business environment. Additionally, with the offcial sunset of the ONIX 2.1 standard on December 31, 2014, there is increased pressure on trading partners in North America to begin accepting and sending ONIX 3.0, for both international and domestic trade. In the most recent revision, new material was added to provide additional guidance for understanding and incorporating the changes introduced with ONIX 3.0. Note on the format of the sections of this document Each of the core data elements detailed in these best practices is described in the following format: 1. Product Block: Because ONIX 3.0 groups information in blocks, all data elements are grouped under the appropriate block heading. Blocks allow updates to be sent without resending a complete record. 2. Defnition and background. 3. The Business case for supplying this data element. 4. Data Requirement: Is this data element mandatory in all product records? Is it Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 6 Metadata Best Practices mandatory in product records that meet certain criteria? (Note that the element may be either technically mandatory within an ONIX record, or considered mandatory to meet BISG’s or BNC’s best practices or certifcation requirements.) 5. Schedule: When, in the life cycle of a product, should this data element be supplied? 6. Notes for data recipients on this data element. 7. Notes on the applicability and use of this data element for digital products. 8. Style and usage guide. 9. ONIX 3.0 guidelines for this data element. 10. ONIX 2.1 guidelines for this data element. GENERAL TECHNICAL GUIDELINES AND BEST PRACTICES This document is not a substitute for EDItEUR’s ONIX 2.1 or 3.0 Specifcations, or the ONIX 3.0 Implementation and Best Practice Guide. We do recommend that you refer to those resources for additional ONIX 2.1 or 3.0 guidance. 1. The publishing and bookselling industries have become more international since the frst edition of these best practices guidelines was published. The use of UTF- 8 Unicode is a best practice. Although it is still an acceptable practice, we can no longer describe the use of the ISO-8859-1 character set as a best practice, given that many publishers in the U.S. and Canada publish books in languages that use other character sets and many booksellers sell books in those same languages. 2. The use of deprecated data elements and code list values cannot be considered best practices, no matter how common some such practices might be. 3. It is a common practice (but not a good practice) for data providers to send teXtual data enclosed within a [CDATA] section in an effort to bypass the parsing rules in a data recipient’s ONIX parser. A best practice is to use simple XHTML markup to format teXtual content for display in recipients’ systems. Data providers cannot and should not rely on any formatting found inside a [CDATA] section being preserved in recipients’ systems. 4. It is a best practice for both data providers and data recipients to use schema validation during application development or when implementing new data feeds. Relying merely on DTD validation does not ensure that the code list values in an ONIX fle are valid. Book Industry Study Group, BookNet Canada — June 1, 2015 7 Metadata Best Practices 5. It is a best practice to begin to rely upon standard identifers such as ISTC (International Standard TeXt Code) to identify the work underlying a product and ISNI (International Standard Name Identifer) to identify the party underlying a name. Variants in the spelling or presentation of the titles of works or the names of parties will thus not result in mismatches between products and their underlying works or mismatches between names and their underlying parties. The use of proprietary work and contributor IDs can be an effective interim step in the identifcation of works and parties until the international standard identifers are adopted more widely. 6. This document is aimed at users of ONIX. However, for data providers using proprietary spreadsheets (either EXcel or browser-based portals for entering data), the intention behind and use of each of these data elements is the same as for ONIX, and the same data elements should be supplied and supported, regardless of message format. 7. Finally, the document has been revised to prioritize guidance on supplying data in ONIX 3.0. ONIX 2.1 was offcially sunset on December 31, 2014, at which time EDItEUR removed the online DTD/XSD XML validation tools from their website and began to archive ONIX 2.1 documentation.
Recommended publications
  • “The Scholarly Monograph's Descendants,” Mary M. Case, Ed., T

    “The Scholarly Monograph's Descendants,” Mary M. Case, Ed., T

    Association of Research Libraries (ARL®) Clifford A. Lynch, “The Scholarly Monograph’s Descendants,” Mary M. Case, ed., The Specialized Scholarly Monograph in Crisis, or How Can I Get Tenure if You Won’t Publish My Book? (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1999), pp. 137‐148. The Scholarly Monograph's Descendants Clifford Lynch, Executive Director, Coalition for Networked Information Introduction This paper looks at the possible evolutionary paths that the current printed scholarly monograph may take, paying particular attention to the ways in which technical, economic, and cultural factors may shape this evolution. It does not predict the demise of today's printed scholarly monograph, but suggests that it will coexist with a series of successors that will offer new points of balance among technical and economic constraints and opportunities and that will provide authors with new ways in which to communicate their research. For some works and purposes, the new forms will be superior; in other cases, the traditional printed monograph will likely remain the preferred form. I begin with a brief examination of the current state of the scholarly journal in its transition to electronic formats–or at least to electronic distribution. This transition is arguably more advanced and taking place on a broader scale than is the evolution of the monograph, and thus it may offer insights into what we can expect for the monograph. At the same time, I will argue that much of the experience with the journal may be misleading when extrapolated directly to the future of the monograph. I have chosen words carefully: I believe that what is happening to the journal is best described as a transition or migration, while what we will see with the monograph is the evolution of digitally based successor genres that will coexist with the current print monograph.
  • How to Read a Historical Monograph Like a Historian October 2018 Gks & Jr

    How to Read a Historical Monograph Like a Historian October 2018 Gks & Jr

    How to Read a Historical Monograph Like a Historian October 2018 gks & jr 1. Start with a BOOK REVIEW Professional historians do all the time. If you want to know a book well-for a discussion or for a research project-the book review is of course no substitute for reading the book. But a good book review will help you to understand the significance of the book you are going to read, its argument, its place in a broader conversation that has been going on. Book reviews have never been so easy to find and access. For a simple search, you might use JSTOR, a vast archive of scholarly journals. It contains the full text of journals running from their first year of publication up to a five years ago. To use JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org, accessible on campus), enter the title you'd like to search for, scroll down and check the box that says history journals, scroll down further and check the box that says reviews, then click on search. Other useful sources: Academic Search Premier, Historical Abstracts, American History and Life, H-Net Reviews. Of course, you have to read book reviews (as all else) with a critical eye. Reviewers, you will see, often disagree about the value of a book, an approach, or an argument. 2. Read the INTRODUCTION very carefully Ask yourself the following questions: * What historical problem is the author addressing? * Are there other interpretations (the work of other historians) that the author finds lacking? Why? * What evidence (what sources) is the author going to examine? * What questions is the author asking about the subject? * What are the answers to these questions? * What is the thesis of the book? All of these questions should be answered in the introduction.
  • The Digital Monograph

    The Digital Monograph

    DigitCult | Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures An Emerging Scholarly Form: The Digital Monograph Massimo Riva Department of Italian Studies Brown University Abstract Two recent initiatives, in the English-speaking world, are currently promoting monograph publishing in digital formats, with a specific focus on the arts and humanities but also including the social sciences. The American initiative is funded by the Andrew W. Mellon foundation; in the U.K., the Arts and Humanities Research Council has also promoted a similar initiative, the Academic Book of the Future, which produced a final report released in Spring 2017. This article describes some of the challenges and opportunities the author and his team are facing in designing a digital monograph on eighteenth and nineteenth-century visual culture, one of two pilot projects of the Brown University library Digital Publishing Initiative, funded by the Mellon foundation. Published 28 December 2017 Correspondence should be addressed to Massimo Riva, Brown University, 190 Hope St., Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Email: [email protected] DigitCult, Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to value international research and to present current debate on digital culture, technological innovation and social change. ISSN: 2531-5994. URL: http://www.digitcult.it Copyright rests with the authors. This work is released under a Creative Commons Attribution (IT) Licence, version 3.0. For details please see http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/it/ DigitCult 63 http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97888255099087 2017, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 63–74. DOI: 10.4399/97888255099087 64 | An Emerging Scholarly Form: The Digital Monograph doi:10.4399/97888255099087 Two Initiatives Two recent initiatives, in the English-speaking world, are currently promoting monograph publishing in digital formats, with a specific focus on the arts and humanities but also including the social sciences.
  • Monograph Or Anthology

    Monograph Or Anthology

    Register a monograph or an anthology You need to Be logged in Menu path See the next page for a more detailed description Research results/NVI Register result Select ‘Book’ Select sub-category Register author Register title Register publisher Register the year of publication, whether the book has been revised, the number of pages, and the NPI scientific field Save Picture guide Click on the main menu ‘Research results/NVI’ and sub-menu ‘Register results’. Select ‘Book’ under main category. You will see this form: Choose the appropriate sub-category. A monograph is a book in which all chapters are written by the same author(s). An anthology is a collection of texts with different authors and it usually has one or more editors. If you have written a chapter of a book that you want to register, you will have to register the book itself as an anthology first, and then the chapters can be linked to the anthology once they are registered. Register author(s) or editors Once you have selected a category, add the authors or editors of the book. For anthologies, first select the role of the person in question (editor, author or editorial board). You can add individuals by searching for their names and selecting them from a list of names. Employees of one of our member institutions are listed with a (P) and usually an institution acronym after their name. Remember to select this registration of the person in order to link the publication to their person profile. If the person is not registered in Cristin, you will have the option to register their name as an unidentified person.
  • Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents

    Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents

    Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents (use control+click to navigate directly to a section) Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations .............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Choosing Monograph Style ........................................................................................................................... 3 Who Decides When a Thesis or Dissertation is Ready to Be Archived? .................................................. 4 Format Requirements That Must be Met ..................................................................................................... 4 Elements of a Thesis or Dissertation—Front Matter, Body and Back Matter .............................................. 4 Other Format Requirements that MUST be met ...................................................................................... 5 Page Size ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Text ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Line Spacing........................................................................................................................................... 5 Margins ................................................................................................................................................
  • IGP® / VGL Emulation Code V™ Graphics Language Programmer's Reference Manual Line Matrix Series Printers

    IGP® / VGL Emulation Code V™ Graphics Language Programmer's Reference Manual Line Matrix Series Printers

    IGP® / VGL Emulation Code V™ Graphics Language Programmer’s Reference Manual Line Matrix Series Printers Trademark Acknowledgements IBM and IBM PC are registered trademarks of the International Business Machines Corp. HP and PCL are registered trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company. IGP, LinePrinter Plus, PSA, and Printronix are registered trademarks of Printronix, LLC. QMS is a registered trademark and Code V is a trademark of Quality Micro Systems, Inc. CSA is a registered certification mark of the Canadian Standards Association. TUV is a registered certification mark of TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc. UL is a registered certification mark of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. This product uses Intellifont Scalable typefaces and Intellifont technology. Intellifont is a registered trademark of Agfa Division, Miles Incorporated (Agfa). CG Triumvirate are trademarks of Agfa Division, Miles Incorporated (Agfa). CG Times, based on Times New Roman under license from The Monotype Corporation Plc is a product of Agfa. Printronix, LLC. makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding this material, including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Printronix, LLC. shall not be held responsible for errors contained herein or any omissions from this material or for any damages, whether direct, indirect, incidental or consequential, in connection with the furnishing, distribution, performance or use of this material. The information in this manual is subject to change without notice. This document contains proprietary information protected by copyright. No part of this document may be reproduced, copied, translated or incorporated in any other material in any form or by any means, whether manual, graphic, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Printronix, LLC.
  • Open Access Policy for Academic Books in the Netherlands

    Open Access Policy for Academic Books in the Netherlands

    Note – Towards an open access policy for academic books in the Netherlands To : NPOS steering committee From : Eelco Ferwerda (OAPEN), Hans de Jonge (NWO), Jeroen Sondervan (VSNU/UKB) & Astrid van Wesenbeeck (KB) Subject : Towards an open access policy for scientific books in the Netherlands Version management : Approved by the NPOS Steering Committee on 14 October 2019 Public version: : 1.0.1 Introduction Progress to open access is lagging behind when it comes to books. This note aims to look at the process through which academic books are published, especially (though not only) for academic monographs. We try to provide some information about the numbers of books published in the Dutch academic context: how many titles are we actually talking about? And we also offer recommendations with regards to developing a policy for promoting an increase in the number of open access books. This note includes an outline of the issues surrounding academic books, the main features of the book publishing process (as compared to journals), and advice on how to arrive at a plan and an accompanying policy for open access for books. Contents 1. The Issue .......................................................................................................................2 2. Definitions/demarcation ...............................................................................................3 3. Books & Journals: Different Publishing Cultures ......................................................4 4. Numbers – Outline of Current Situation......................................................................5
  • Linking USDA Nutrition Databases to IRI Household-Based and Store-Based Scanner Data, TB-1952, U.S

    Linking USDA Nutrition Databases to IRI Household-Based and Store-Based Scanner Data, TB-1952, U.S

    Uniteited Sd Staates Ds Depaarrttmmeent of Af Aggricuultuuree Economic Research Linking USDA Nutrition Databases to IRI Service Household-Based and Store-Store-BasedBased Technical Bulletin Number 1952 Scanner Data March 2019 Andrea C. Carlson, Elina Tselepidakis Page, Thea Palmer Zimmerman, Carina E. Tornow, and Sigurd Hermansen United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov Recommended citation format for this publication: Andrea C. Carlson, Elina Tselepidakis Page, Thea Palmer Zimmerman, Carina E. Tornow, and Sigurd Hermansen. Linking USDA Nutrition Databases to IRI Household-Based and Store-Based Scanner Data, TB-1952, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, March 2019. Cover image: Getty images. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. To ensure the quality of its research reports and satisfy governmentwide standards, ERS requires that all research reports with substantively new material be reviewed by qualified technical research peers. This technical peer review process, coordinated by ERS' Peer Review Coordinating Council, allows experts who possess the technical background, perspective, and expertise to provide an objective and meaningful assessment of the output’s substantive content and clarity of communication during the publication’s review. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs).
  • Sejarah Perkembangan Dan Kemajuan the International Bussines Machines

    Sejarah Perkembangan Dan Kemajuan the International Bussines Machines

    SEJARAH PERKEMBANGAN DAN KEMAJUAN THE INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES MACHINES Oleh : ANGGARA WISNU PUTRA 1211011018 CIPTA AJENG PRATIWI 1211011034 DERI KURNIAWAN 1211011040 FEBY GIPANTIUS ZAMA 1211011062 NOVITA LIANA SARI 1211011118 RAMA AGUSTINA 1211011128 FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG BANDAR LAMPUNG 2014 BAB II PEMBAHASAN 2.1 Sejarah berdirinya THE INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES MACHINES (IBM) 1880—1929 Pada tahun 1880-an, beberapa teknologi yang akan menjadi bisnis IBM ditemukan. Julius E. Pitrap menemukan timbangan komputer pada tahun 1885. Alexander Dey menemukan dial recorder tahun 1888. Herman Hollerith menemukan Electric Tabulating Machine 1989 dan pada tahun yang sama Williard Bundy menemukan alat untuk mengukur waktu kerja karyawan. Pada 16 Juni 1911, teknologi-teknologi tersebut dan perusahaan yang memilikinya digabungkan oleh Charles Ranlett Flint dan membentuk Computing Tabulating Recording Company (CTR). Perusahaan yang berbasis di New York ini memiliki 1.300 karyawan dan area perkantoran serta pabrik di Endicott dan Binghamton, New York; Dayton, Ohio; Detroit, Michigan; Washington, D.C.; dan Toronto, Ontario. CTR memproduksi dan menjual berbagai macam jenis mesin mulai dari timbangan komersial hingga pengukur waktu kerja. Pada tahun 1914, Flint merekrut Thomas J. Watson, Sr., dari National Cash Register Company, untuk membantunya memimpin perusahaan. Watson menciptakan slogan, ―THINK‖, yang segera menjadi mantra bagi karyawan CTR. Dalam waktu 11 bulan setelah bergabung, Watson menjadi presiden dari CTR. Perusahaan memfokuskan diri pada penyediaan solusi penghitungan dalam skala besar untuk bisnis. Selama empat tahun pertama kepemimpinannya, Watson sukses meningkatkan pendapatan hingga lebih dari dua kali lipat dan mencapai $9 juta. Ia juga sukses mengembangkan sayap ke Eropa, Amerika Selatan, Asia, dan Australia. Pada 14 Februari 1924, CTR berganti nama menjadi International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).
  • Barcodes and Rfids

    Barcodes and Rfids

    Barcodes and RFIDs Martin Dodge and Rob Kitchin For: Globalization in Practice (edited by Nigel Thrift, Adam Tickell and Steve Woolgar) Introduction One of the key phenomena of the globalization of commerce has been the internationalisation of goods and brands. A set of diverse practices and processes, including the transformation of transport infrastructure and logistics and the virtualisation of money, have enabled both producers (e.g., goods manufacturers) and sellers (e.g., wholesalers, supermarkets) to massively extend supply chains, to globally expand their markets, and to increase their turnover and profits. A key technology in improving the efficiency and productivity of logistical organisation and operation has been development of sophisticated identification systems that overcome the anonymity of manufactured products by assigning unique numerical identifiers – digital thumbprints - to material products. These identification systems allow products to be effectively and unambiguously processed, shipped and traced through complex logistical networks, to monitor sales, aid account management, refine supply chains and inform marketing strategies. Conceptually they have two distinct components, first an agreed allocation of unique id code numbers and, second, an agreed media to physical store the code. The most obvious manifestation of this technology for product identification and tracking are the parallel black and white printed stripes of barcodes. Barcodes Barcodes, visible on nearly all, retail products are the physical manifestation of UPCs (Universal Product Code) – a code that uniquely identifies a product regardless of location or language. The original UPC concept can be traced back to 1940s, but gained widespread acceptance and usage in the 1970s with the development of a UPC standard by a group of U.S.
  • Tips for Marketing Fresh Produce to Retail Grocers: Using PLU and UPC Codes a Guide for Producers

    Tips for Marketing Fresh Produce to Retail Grocers: Using PLU and UPC Codes a Guide for Producers

    Working with Local Fresh Produce in Retail Settings Tips for Marketing Fresh Produce to Retail Grocers: Using PLU and UPC Codes A Guide for Producers What is a PLU? What is a UPC? PLU and UPC codes help retailers identify or scan your product into their cash register system. Being knowledgeable about the differences in these labels in advance of approaching a retailer may help you get your foot in the door. These codes are not only a necessity for some retailers, but also a marketing tool for your farm, because they carry information about your farm and products along the supply chain. This informational sheet contains information adapted from the Produce Marketing Association. NC Growing Together, a CEFS-led initiative, is funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, grant #2012-68004-20363 www.ncgrowingtogether.org PLU and UPC Codes PLU Codes_________________________________________________________________ A PLU code, or price look up code, is a 4 or 5 digit code that is unique to a particular produce item; based upon the commodity, the variety and the size group; and will typically appear on a small sticker that is applied to the individual piece of fresh produce. These codes are standard across the produce industry and in all retail grocers. They help cashiers identify the variety and therefore the price of a product. For example, a hydroponic/greenhouse tomato has the PLU 4799, while a slicing tomato has the PLU 4805. The retailer may charge $2.99 per lb for a hydroponic, but $1.49 per lb for a slicing tomato.
  • Monograph Output of American University Presses, 2009-2013

    Monograph Output of American University Presses, 2009-2013

    Monograph Output of American University Presses, 2009-2013 A Report Prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation February 10, 2017 Prepared by: Joseph J. Esposito Karen Barch Esposito & Barch re university press monograph output 1 Table of Contents I. Summary 3 II. Introduction 3 III. Methodology 8 IV. Phase One: The Pilot Project 13 V. Phase Two: The Core Database 20 VI. Sidebar: Output for All Titles (not just monographs) 42 VII. Phase Three: An Experiment with OCLC 44 VIII. Discussion 47 Esposito & Barch re university press monograph output 2 I. Summary This is a report on a linked series of projects to study the output of American university presses in the time period 2009-2013. A large amount of data was collected from the presses themselves; it was then aggregated and analyzed. This analysis yielded reports for the internal use of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation ("Mellon"), the sponsor of this research. Subsequently we prepared individual reports for the participating presses. We also experimented on a project with OCLC1 in which we attempted to map (with only partial results) the database of press titles to the holdings in WorldCat. This report (the "public report") represents an edited version of the various private reports submitted to Mellon and the presses. The primary thrust of the project can be found in Section V: Phase Two: The Core Database. II. Introduction The genesis of this project came about from conversations in 2013-2014 within the academy concerning the condition and future of university press publishing and, in particular, the academic monograph, which is an essential component of scholarly communications and which also plays a role in the credentialing of scholars.