Arnold Arboretum Popular Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Aquatic Macrophytes of Northeastern Brazil: Checklist, Richness
Check List 9(2): 298–312, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Aquatic macrophytes of Northeastern Brazil: Checklist, PECIES S richness, distribution and life forms OF Edson Gomes de Moura-Júnior 1, Liliane Ferreira Lima 1, Simone Santos Lira Silva 2, Raíssa Maria ISTS 3 4 5* 4 L Sampaio de Paiva , Fernando Alves Ferreira , Carmen Silvia Zickel and Arnildo Pott 1 Graduate student (PhD) in Plant Biology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Biology Department. Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627. CEP 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Graduate student (PhD) in Botany, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Biology Department. Av. Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n°, Dois Irmãos. CEP 52171-900. Recife, PE, Brazil. 3 Graduate student (MSc) in Natural Resource, Universidade Federal de Roraima, Biology Department. Av. Capitão Ene Garcez, 2413, Aeroporto, Boa Vista. CEP 69304-000. Roraima, RR, Brazil. 4 Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Program in Plant Biology, Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Biology Department. Cidade Universitária, s/n - CEP 79070-900. Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 5 Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Program in Botany, Biology Department. Av. Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n°, Dois Irmãos. CEP 52171-900. Recife, PE, Brazil. * Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: checklist of aquaticAquatic macrophytesplants have great occurring influence in the on northeastern the structure region and dynamics of Brazil throughof aquatic a bibliographic ecosystems, thereby search. Wecontributing recorded aconsiderably total of 412 tospecies, biodiversity. 217 genera In Brazil, and 72 knowledge families. -
Erigenia : Journal of the Southern Illinois Native Plant Society
ERIGENIA THE LIBRARY OF THE DEC IS ba* Number 13 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS June 1994 ^:^;-:A-i.,-CS..;.iF/uGN SURVEY Conference Proceedings 26-27 September 1992 Journal of the Eastern Illinois University Illinois Native Plant Society Charleston Erigenia Number 13, June 1994 Editor: Elizabeth L. Shimp, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Shawnee National Forest, 901 S. Commercial St., Harrisburg, IL 62946 Copy Editor: Floyd A. Swink, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL 60532 Publications Committee: John E. Ebinger, Botany Department, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL 61920 Ken Konsis, Forest Glen Preserve, R.R. 1 Box 495 A, Westville, IL 61883 Kenneth R. Robertson, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 E. Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL 61820 Lawrence R. Stritch, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Shawnee National Forest, 901 S. Commercial Su, Harrisburg, IL 62946 Cover Design: Christopher J. Whelan, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL 60532 Cover Illustration: Jean Eglinton, 2202 Hazel Dell Rd., Springfield, IL 62703 Erigenia Artist: Nancy Hart-Stieber, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL 60532 Executive Committee of the Society - April 1992 to May 1993 President: Kenneth R. Robertson, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 E. Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL 61820 President-Elect: J. William Hammel, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, IL 62701 Past President: Jon J. Duerr, Kane County Forest Preserve District, 719 Batavia Ave., Geneva, IL 60134 Treasurer: Mary Susan Moulder, 918 W. Woodlawn, Danville, IL 61832 Recording Secretary: Russell R. Kirt, College of DuPage, Glen EUyn, IL 60137 Corresponding Secretary: John E. Schwegman, Illinois Department of Conservation, Springfield, IL 62701 Membership: Lorna J. Konsis, Forest Glen Preserve, R.R. -
Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing -
Native Trees of Georgia
1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W. -
East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig. -
National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt. -
Binney Park Trees
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! um ! re!t bo ! ! Ar ! ! ! ! ! wn !! !!! o ! h T wic ! ! ! n k SO e r ! U r! e a N ! D ! G! P ! B ! ! E y ! ! ! AC ! ! e !! ! !! H A ! ! n V ! n ! E ! i ! !! ! ! ! B ! ! ! ! l2l!1 ! l69! !l3 ! ! ! ! ! l68 ! ! VERONA DR ! ! l!4 ! l!67 ! !7 6 ! ! l l6 ! ! ! ! ! 8 ! ! l !5 ! l6 !5 ! ! l! ! 4 ! ! d l6 ! n ! 6 e l ! g es ! l9 ! L! e re l63 ! d T !2 ! ! ! e !l6!! ! E W u ! ! ! q ! ! V IN la P ! ! TH P EL A R L l ! O s PL 8 ! ! P ld l5 ! H !! DR ie 7 !l61 ! ! F 5 C ! ts PE l ! r A po LL 5!6 l60 ! ! S ! P l ! ! ! ! E ! L ! l ! ! B l5!5 59 ! ! ! ! ! D ! ! ! l5!4! N ! ! ! 10 U ! l O ! 2 5!3 ! l!5 l l12 S ! ! ! ! ! l11 l51 ! ! ! ! ! ! 5!0 l13 ! ! !8 l l4 4 ! ! ! l1 7 l4!9 5 l4 ! !! ! 1 ! ! ll16 ! !7 ! l4!6 ! l1 ! ! ! ! ! 8 ! ! 1 l!5 ! ! !l 4 !!9! ! ! l1! ! !! 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2! ! 23 l! ! ! l l! ! ! ! ! ! !4 ! 21 ! ! l2 E ! ! l2!2 ! V ! !! T A ! ! ! !4 ! ! ! ! !! S 4 ! l H AY ! ! ! ENOKE W ! OW ! C H! l25 ! ! C! ! A ! E R! A B ! ! ! ! ! ! ! D ! N ! U WEBB AVE ! ! ! ! O ! ! S l4!3 ! ! ! N R L D ! TER T E l4!2 PO ! S ! E ! 1 R 4l V ! ! A ! O ! ! ! H H ! ! ! C N A O ! ! ! ! E ! R ! B I ! ! l40 D ! ! ! N ! U ! 3!9 l26 ! l O ! ! 400 ° ! t S ! ! ! Fee ! ! ! 38 l27 200 ! l 0 ! ! 10 ! ! 0 ! ! !7 ! ! l3! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 6 ! ! ! !! !l3 ! ! !9 ! ! 35 ! 2!! ! ! !! ! 1 l! ! l 3 l! 8! ! ! 4 !3 l 2 ! ! 3ll3l2 ! ! ! 3 l!30 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Pin Oak Quercus palustris 36 White Pine Pinus strobus 2 Japanese Pagoda Styphnolobium japonicum 37 Royalty Crab Malus Royalty 3 Katsura Cercidiphyllum -
Brewing Beer with Native Plants (Seasonality)
BREWING BEER WITH INDIANA NATIVE PLANTS Proper plant identification is important. Many edible native plants have poisonous look-alikes! Availability/When to Harvest Spring. Summer. Fall Winter . Year-round . (note: some plants have more than one part that is edible, and depending on what is being harvested may determine when that harvesting period is) TREES The wood of many native trees (especially oak) can be used to age beer on, whether it be barrels or cuttings. Woods can also be used to smoke the beers/malts as well. Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga Canadensis): Needles and young twigs can be brewed into a tea or added as ingredients in cooking, similar flavoring to spruce. Tamarack (Larix laricina): Bark and twigs can be brewed into a tea with a green, earthy flavor. Pine species (Pinus strobus, Pinus banksiana, Pinus virginiana): all pine species have needles that can be made into tea, all similar flavor. Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana): mature, dark blue berries and young twigs may be made into tea or cooked with, similar in flavor to most other evergreen species. Pawpaw (Asimina triloba): edible fruit, often described as a mango/banana flavor hybrid. Sassafras (Sassafras albidum): root used to make tea, formerly used to make rootbeer. Similarly flavored, but much more earthy and bitter. Leaves have a spicier, lemony taste and young leaves are sometimes used in salads. Leaves are also dried and included in file powder, common in Cajun and Creole cooking. Northern Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis): Ripe, purple-brown fruits are edible and sweet. Red Mulberry (Morus rubra): mature red-purple-black fruit is sweet and juicy. -
Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan Annarbor, Miciiigan
OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANNARBOR, MICIIIGAN THE SPHAERODACTYLUS (SAURIA: GEKKONIDAE) OF MIDDLE AMERICA INTRODUCTION Splzaerodactylus is one of the most speciose genera of gekkonid lizards. It is confined to the Neotropics, and the majority of its divers- ity is found in the West Indies where approximately 69 species, and an additional 74 subspecies, have been well-documented (King, 1962; Schwartz, 1964, 1966, 1968, 1977; Schwartz and Garrido, 1981; Schwartz and Graham, 1980; Schwartz and Thomas, 1964, 1975, 1983; Schwartz, Thomas, and Ober, 1978; Thomas, 1964, 1975; Thomas and Schwartz, 1966a,b). The mainland radiation was poorly understood until 1982 when Harris published his revision of South American sphaerodactyls. No comprehensive study has yet been at- tempted for Middle American forms, and it remains the last area of taxonomic confusion in the genus. The number of taxa currently recognized in Middle America is not great (10 species according to Peters and Donoso-Barros [1970], Schwartz [1973], and Smith and Taylor [1950b, 19661); however, their geographic distribution and variation, and status as species or subspecies remain to be con- vincingly demonstrated. The Middle American sphaerodactyl fauna appears to be divisible into two geographical-historical components. Most of the taxa may be thought of as belonging to an endemic group because the sister taxon *Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michi- gan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 U.S.A. 2 Harris and Kluge Orc. P~I~P):) of each species also exhibits a mainland distribution. Only two, S. arg-us Gosse (1850) and S. -
Ii \ T MEXICAN GRASSES in the UNITED STATES NATIONAL
■ . ~+j-,r?7-w- - i i - . \ t MEXICAN GRASSES IN THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL HERBARIUM. By A. S, Hitchcock INTRODUCTION. The following list of grasses, based entirely upon specimens in the United States National Herbarium, is a preliminary paper, in which the scattered data upon Mexican grasses have been brought together and arranged in a convenient form. The species included have been accepted, for the most part, in their traditional sense. It has been impracticable to examine the types of many of the earlier described species since these specimens are located in European herbaria. For this reason the synonymy has been confined mostly to those names that could be fixed by an examination of American types, or concerning the application of which there was little doubt. The largest number of unidentified names are found in Fournier's work on Mexican grasses.1 This results from the incomplete or unsatis- factory descriptions and from the fact that the specimens cited under a given species either may not agree with the diagnosis, or may belong to two or more species, at least in different herbaria. An examination of the original specimens will undoubtedly lead to the identification of the greater part of these names. There are several specimens that have been omitted from the list because they have not been identified and are apparently unde- scribed species. They belong to genera, however, that are much in need of critical revision and further study of them is deferred for the present. In subsequent articles it is hoped to work out the classifi- cation of the tropical American grasses upon a type basis KEY TO THE GENEBA. -
Pseudodidymellaceae Fam. Nov.: Phylogenetic Affiliations Of
available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 87: 187–206 (2017). Pseudodidymellaceae fam. nov.: Phylogenetic affiliations of mycopappus-like genera in Dothideomycetes A. Hashimoto1,2, M. Matsumura1,3, K. Hirayama4, R. Fujimoto1, and K. Tanaka1,3* 1Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hirosaki University, 3 Bunkyo-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8561, Japan; 2Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan; 3The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University, 18–8 Ueda 3 chome, Morioka, 020-8550, Japan; 4Apple Experiment Station, Aomori Prefectural Agriculture and Forestry Research Centre, 24 Fukutami, Botandaira, Kuroishi, Aomori, 036-0332, Japan *Correspondence: K. Tanaka, [email protected] Abstract: The familial placement of four genera, Mycodidymella, Petrakia, Pseudodidymella, and Xenostigmina, was taxonomically revised based on morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of nuclear rDNA SSU, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequences. ITS sequences were also provided as barcode markers. A total of 130 sequences were newly obtained from 28 isolates which are phylogenetically related to Melanommataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) and its relatives. Phylo- genetic analyses and morphological observation of sexual and asexual morphs led to the conclusion that Melanommataceae should be restricted to its type genus Melanomma, which is characterised by ascomata composed of a well-developed, carbonaceous peridium, and an aposphaeria-like coelomycetous asexual morph. Although Mycodidymella, Petrakia, Pseudodidymella, and Xenostigmina are phylogenetically related to Melanommataceae, these genera are characterised by epi- phyllous, lenticular ascomata with well-developed basal stroma in their sexual morphs, and mycopappus-like propagules in their asexual morphs, which are clearly different from those of Melanomma.