DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Cumbria County Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Cumbria County Council Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Cumbria County Council Electoral review October 2011 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2011 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 General analysis 8 Electoral arrangements 9 Allerdale Borough 9 Barrow-in-Furness Borough 11 Carlisle City 12 Copeland Borough 13 Eden District 15 South Lakeland District 15 Conclusions 16 Parish electoral arrangements 16 3 What happens next? 21 4 Mapping 23 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 24 B Code of practice on written consultation 27 C Table C1: Draft recommendations for Cumbria County 28 Council Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We are conducting an electoral review of Cumbria County Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority. The review aims to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same. The Commission commenced the review in October 2010. This review is being conducted as follows: Stage Stage starts Description Council 12 October 2010 Submission of proposals for council size to the LGBCE Size One 29 March 2011 Submission of proposals of warding arrangements to the LGBCE Two 20 June 2011 LGBCE’s analysis and deliberation Three 25 October 2011 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them Four 17 January 2012 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Submissions received We received 37 submissions during its initial consultation on council size. During Stage One, we received 30 submissions, although these did not include any scheme which covered the whole of the county. The Liberal Democrat Group on the council provided some proposals for Carlisle, Eden and South Lakeland districts, but not for Barrow-in-Furness, Copeland or Allerdale. The Labour Party put forward limited proposals for the Barrow-in Furness, Allerdale and Copeland areas. The Commission also received localised evidence of community identity from parish councils and local residents. All submissions can be viewed on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk Analysis and draft recommendations Electorate figures Cumbria County Council has forecast an increase in electorate of 3% across the whole county, for the six-year period 2010-2016. We were not initially persuaded that the Council had sufficiently justified its electorate forecasts. In particular we noted that the Council had calculated a figure for electorate growth by district and simply provided a pro-rata figure for each constituent polling district. We considered it a significant risk that the forecasts would not take account of specific development sites within the county and queried the Council’s methodology but it said it stood by its original forecast methodology. While we remain concerned about the Council’s approach, on balance we are willing to accept these figures as the only forecast available at this time. However, we would welcome any further comments on this issue during the consultation phase. 1 Council size Cumbria County Council currently has a council size of 84 councillors. We received 37 submissions during our consultation on council size. The Council recommended the retention of 84 members, providing evidence of its geographic and socio-economic conditions. It also asserted that size, rurality, sparsity and deprivation levels present additional challenges to county councillors, adding to their workloads. Its proposal had cross party support. We also received representations on a council size of 65 from John Stevenson MP and Carlisle City Council and South Lakeland District Council. A number of other respondents also expressed support for a reduction in council size. Overall, we were not persuaded that there was sufficient rationale to justify any of the proposed council sizes. However, following further discussions with the political leadership of the Council, we obtained more detailed information relating to the roles and responsibilities of elected members. In light of this, we propose the retention of a council size of 84 for Cumbria County Council. General analysis In the absence of an authority-wide scheme and substantive evidence in many parts of the county, the Commission has been obliged to develop proposals based primarily on the need to achieve good levels of electoral equality. This has been balanced against evidence of community identity where such localised submissions have been received. Our draft recommendations provide for 84 single-member divisions. In each district, where possible we have sought to reflect communication links, geographic factors and evidence of community identity received during Stage One. Given the absence of substantial evidence so far about appropriate boundaries, based on our statutory criteria, we are especially keen to receive evidence during the consultation period which will helps us to determine our final scheme. What happens next? There will now be a consultation period, during which time we encourage comment on the draft recommendations for the proposed electoral arrangements for Cumbria County Council contained in the report. We take this consultation very seriously and it is therefore important that all those interested in the review should let us have their views and evidence, whether or not they agree with these draft proposals. We will take into account all submissions received by 16 January 2012. Any received after this date may not be taken into account. We would particularly welcome local views backed up by demonstrable evidence. We will consider all the evidence submitted to us during the consultation period before preparing our final recommendations. Express your views by writing directly to us at: Review Officer Cumbria Review The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Layden House 76–86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG [email protected] The full report is available to download at www.lgbce.org.uk 2 1 Introduction 1 The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. This electoral review is being conducted following our decision to review Cumbria County Council’s electoral arrangements, to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same across the authority. 2 We wrote to Cumbria County Council as well as other interested parties inviting the submission of proposals first on the council size and, subsequently, on division arrangements for the Council. The submissions received during these stages of the review have informed our draft recommendations. 3 We are now conducting a full public consultation on the draft recommendations. Following this period of consultation, we will consider the evidence received and will publish our final recommendations for the new electoral arrangements for Cumbria County Council in the spring of 2012. What is an electoral review? 4 The main aim of an electoral review is to try to ensure ‘electoral equality’, which means that all councillors in a single authority represent approximately the same number of electors. Our objective is to make recommendations that will improve electoral equality, while also trying to reflect communities in the area and provide for effective and convenient local government. 5 Our three main considerations – equalising the number of electors each councillor represents; reflecting community identity; and providing for effective and 1 convenient local government – are set out in legislation and our task is to strike the best balance between them when making our recommendations. Our powers, as well as the guidance we have provided for electoral reviews and further information on the review process, can be found on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk Why are we conducting a review in Cumbria? 6 We decided to conduct this review because, based on the December 2009 electorate figures, more than 30% of the divisions have electoral variances of over 10% from the average for the county. In addition, one division, Dalston & Cummersdale varies by 33% from the average for the county. How will the recommendations affect you? 7 The recommendations will determine how many councillors will serve on the County Council. They will also decide which division in which you vote in, which other communities are in that division and, in some instances, which parish or town council wards you vote in. Your division name may change, as may the names of parish or town council wards in the area. If you live in a parish, the name or boundaries of that parish will not change. 1 Schedule 2 to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 3 8 It is therefore important that you let us have your comments and views on the draft recommendations. We encourage comments from everyone in the community, regardless of whether you agree with the draft recommendations or not. The draft recommendations are evidence based and we therefore stress the importance of providing evidence in any comments on our recommendations, rather than relying on assertion. We will accept comments and views until 16 January 2012. After this point, we will be formulating our final recommendations which we are due to publish in spring of 2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEVELOPMENT CONTROL and REGULATION COMMITTEE 27 July 2010 a Report by the Assistant Director - Planning & Sustainability
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 27 July 2010 A Report by the Assistant Director - Planning & Sustainability _____________________________________________________________________ Application No 1/10/9006 District Carlisle Applicant United Utilities Parish Stanwix Rural Clearwater 4 Lingley Green Avenue Date of Receipt 11 May 2010 Warrington WA5 3BP _____________________________________________________________________ PROPOSAL To construct a new Wastewater Pumping Station, removal of 2m of hedgerow, access track and erection of motor control kiosk. Field north of 'Laithholme', Park Broom, Carlisle, CA6 4QH _____________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That planning permission is granted for the reasons stated in Appendix 1 and subject to the conditions in Appendix 2. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The application site is a field located adjacent to an unclassified road leading south from the A689 to the hamlet of Park Broom, which is situated to the east of Carlisle. This section of the field is currently being used as the contractors compound for the new sewer works. A 3m wide section of hedgerow has been removed to give access for the contractor's compound. This would leave space for provision of the access gates for entry into the pumping station. 2.2 The proposal is for construction of an underground pumping station to serve a new sewer being built as part of a first time sewerage scheme for the village of Park Broom. Currently properties are served by septic tanks, which discharge via ditches, some of which are heavily polluted, to the River Eden. The above ground development would consist of a concrete slab over the pumping station and a control kiosk. In addition there would be a grass seeded compacted stone access track and turning space created to enable servicing of the development.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanwix Rural Community Action Plan 2017 - 2021
    Stanwix Rural Community Action Plan 2017 - 2021 Issue Action(s) Lead Group & Partners Priority Timescale Resources Progress A689 Concerns regarding Collate safety data and work with lead Cumbria Highways Police safety/RTA's/near misses on agency to progress Parish Council confirmed road action is being High considered at Parish Council CRASH meeting 1 - 3 years to consider Insufficient road signage Speak to other agencies who are responsible Cumbria Highways partnership for roads working with Rubbish clearance Encourage reporting of fly-tipping Cumbria County Council agencies for Carlisle City Council funding Parish Council Medium Provision of footpaths & cycle Identify areas for development Parish Council 2 - 5 years Need to ways Cumbria County Council prioritise. Wall Together Brunstock Common Land No recreation facilities Identify suitable recreational facilities & Parish Council High 1 - 3 years Parish Council Area tidied up. available; lack of begin funding sourcing (for e.g. sports Invite residents from Brunstock External Public meeting maintenance/development facilities, play facilities etc) to form a working group Funders to be held to Begin plan of maintenance for the area Local People consider way (better hedge cutting, planting?) Grant bodies forward. Street Lighting in Houghton Concerns regarding street Ask for a survey to be carried out of lighting Cumbria County Council Medium 2 - 5 years Cumbria County Works to be lighting in numerous areas and discuss options for increased provision Parish Council Council; completed. Local Residents Parish Council Police Problems Speeding in Houghton Reduce speeding, raise awareness Cumbria Police High 1 - 2 years Parish Council Police van in Lobby for increased signage; Local residents Cumbria County regular begin use of speed radar gun Parish Council Council; attendance, Cumbria Highways Cumbria Police more volunteers to be recruited.
    [Show full text]
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidelines Winter 2018
    Issue 49 Winter 2018 Eels in the Classroom Page 4-5 Coastline Pollinators Project Page 6-7 SCRAPbook Pilots Page 10-11 Chairman’s Column Alastair McNeill FCIWEM C.WEM MCMI e live in times when there are increasing and often progressing at pace and it is pleasing to note that Coastwise competing demands on the marine environment has received considerable promotion as the result of featuring Wincluding the Solway Firth. SFP’s key aim is to on TV, newspapers and social media. The Coastwise make a significant contribution to sustainable development Facebook page had over 1900 followers at the time of the and environment protection by supporting integrated marine Board’s September meeting. The Solway Marine Information, and coastal planning. This continues to be achieved through Learning and Environment (SMILE) Project aims to identify the provision of transparent, balanced and respected gaps in existing data, will gather information and, share practices that support objective, impartial, evidence-based knowledge using innovative communications: it will update mechanisms involving cooperation and consensus. and supersede the Partnership’s Solway Review of 1996. Marine planning, resulting from an EU Directive, introduced Activities undertaken thus far are ensuring the project is well a process for maritime spatial planning on both sides of the on its way to delivering its outcomes and, subject to Solway. In Scotland, the National Marine Plan successful bids for EMFF support, will potentially sets out a framework to promote sustainable result in separate maritime socioeconomic development and the sustainable use of studies on both the north and south marine resources. Currently, three Solway coastlines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Received Pronunciation on a West Cumbrian Speaker of English Provincial Standard By- Joan Barbara Pashola
    The influence of received pronunciation on a west Cumbrian speaker of English provincial standard by- Joan Barbara Pashola Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy* School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 1970 ProQuest Number: 10731613 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731613 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This is a study of the influence of received pronunciation on a speaker from Workington, Cumberland, His speech is described as occtipying a position between received pronunciation and the more conservative Workington speech norm. In this regard he is contrasted with a second Workington man, of identical background, and their status as typical Workington speakex^s is established by means of a questionnaire. Attention is limited to diffex'ing phonetic realisations of the same vowel phonemes, noted impressionistically and supported by accompanying acoustic analysis. Exemplification is provided by a tape-recording of the same passage spoken by the two informants with a transcription of the passage showing linguistic innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris, Member of Holm Monthly Meeting, Master
    Friends in Admiral Rodney's Squadron In 1781 two members of Holm Monthly Meeting, Cumberland, were impressed into the British Navy; Joseph Skelton and Jonathan Taylor were taken from the merchant ship Isabella, Anthony Harris, member of Holm Monthly Meeting, master. Their plight has recently come to light in two letters found in the archives of New York Yearly Meeting. The letter "on behalf of Joseph Skelton1' written at Wigton in 4th month 1782 is signed by eight members of Holm Monthly Meeting. TO FRIENDS IN NORTH AMERICA OR ELSEWHERE Dear Friends: Whereas our Friends Clement Skelton and Anthony Harris, have requested our Certificate, in favour of Joseph Skelton, who was impressed from his Master, Anthony Harris, at New York the loth day of the i ith month 1781, and carried on Board the King's Ship, Intrepid, Capt. Molloy, one of Admiral Rodney's Squadrent, if the above Ship should come to New York, or any way under your Notice, that you make Enquire for Jo« Skelton, and use your utmost indeavors to procure him his Liberty; or any other Assistance in your power, will much oblige your Friends and Brethern. These are to certify to you on his behalf that Clement Skelton and Anthony Harris, are both members of our Monthly Meeting, the young man Jo! Skelton had a religious and sober education with his Father, his conduct whilst here and also when under our Friend Anthony Harris, his late Master, was orderly and agreeable to Friends which Intitles him to the esteem of a member, we there­ fore Recommend him to your tender Notice; indeavoring if it seem practible to Obtain him Liberty from his disagreeable Confine­ ment, so with desire for the same, and his preservation, and Growth in the Truth, we remain your Friends and Brethern, Signed in and on behalf of the Holm Monthly Meeting held at Wigton in the County of Cumberland, the i8th of 4th month 1782.
    [Show full text]
  • About Cumbria Text and Graphics
    Building pride in Cumbria About Cumbria Cumbria is located in the North West of England. Allerdale The County’s western boundary is defined by the Irish Sea and stretches from the Solway Firth down to Incorporating an impressive coastline, rugged Morecambe Bay. It meets Scotland in the North and mountains and gentle valleys, much of which lie the Pennine Hills to the East. It is the second largest within the Lake District National Park, the borough of county in England and covers almost half (48%) of Allerdale covers a large part of Cumbria’s west coast. the whole land area of the North West region. It is Approximately 95,000 people live within the borough generally recognised as an outstandingly beautiful which includes the towns of Workington, Cockermouth area and attracts huge loyalty from local people and and Keswick. visitors from both the British Isles and overseas. Workington, an ancient market town which also has Cumbria’s settlement pattern is distinct and has been an extensive history of industry lies on the coast at dictated principally by its unique topography. The the mouth of the River Derwent. During the Roman large upland area of fells and mountains in the centre occupation of Britain it was the site of one of the means that the majority of settlements are located Emperor Hadrian’s forts which formed part of the on the periphery of the County and cross-county elaborate coastal defence system of the Roman Wall. communications are limited. The town we see today has grown up around the port and iron and steel manufacturing have long Cumbria is home to around 490,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbria Business Survey 2015/16 – Flood Impact Report Prepared For: Cumbria Local Enterprise Partnership
    Research Report Cumbria Business Survey 2015/16 – Flood Impact Report Prepared for: Cumbria Local Enterprise Partnership Cumbria Business Survey 2015/16 – Flood Impact Report Prepared for: Cumbria Local Enterprise Partnership Prepared by: June Wiseman, Director and Emma Parry, Associate Director, BMG Research Date: August 2016 Produced by BMG Research © Bostock Marketing Group Ltd, 2016 www.bmgresearch.co.uk Project: 9808 Registered in England No. 2841970 Registered office: BMG Research Beech House Greenfield Crescent Edgbaston Birmingham B15 3BE UK Tel: +44 (0) 121 3336006 UK VAT Registration No. 580 6606 32 Birmingham Chamber of Commerce Member No. B4626 Market Research Society Company Partner British Quality Foundation Member The provision of Market Research Services in accordance with ISO 20252:2012 The provision of Market Research Services in accordance with ISO 9001:2008 The International Standard for Information Security Management ISO 27001:2013 Investors in People Standard - Certificate No. WMQC 0614 Interviewer Quality Control Scheme (IQCS) Member Company Registered under the Data Protection Act - Registration No. Z5081943 The BMG Research logo is a trade mark of Bostock Marketing Group Ltd Table of Contents 1 Impact of 2015 floods ..................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Key points ............................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Experience of storm and floods ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English/French
    World Heritage 36 COM WHC-12/36.COM/8D Paris, 1 June 2012 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-sixth Session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 24 June – 6 July 2012 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8D: Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties in response to the Retrospective Inventory SUMMARY This document refers to the results of the Retrospective Inventory of nomination files of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. To date, seventy States Parties have responded to the letters sent following the review of the individual files, in order to clarify the original intention of their nominations (or to submit appropriate cartographic documentation) for two hundred fifty-three World Heritage properties. This document presents fifty-five boundary clarifications received from twenty-five States Parties, as an answer to the Retrospective Inventory. Draft Decision: 36 COM 8D, see Point IV I. The Retrospective Inventory 1. The Retrospective Inventory, an in-depth examination of the Nomination dossiers available at the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN, was initiated in 2004, in parallel with the launching of the Periodic Reporting exercise in Europe, involving European properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. The same year, the Retrospective Inventory was endorsed by the World Heritage Committee at its 7th extraordinary session (UNESCO, 2004; see Decision 7 EXT.COM 7.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Allerdale Childcare Providers
    Allerdale Childcare Providers Town for online form Setting Name Address Telephone number Abbeytown Pre-School Main Street Abbeytown Abbeytown Pre-School Abbeytown 016973 61511 Wigton CA7 4RU Bolton Low Houses Childcare Unit Bolton Low Houses C of E Primary School 016973 44462 Wigton Bolton Low Houses Childcare Unit Bolton Low Houses 0798 003 7785 Wigton CA7 8PA Cuddly Koalas Pre-School The Chapel Seaton Road 01900 815029 Broughton Moor Cuddly Koalas Pre-School Broughton Moor 0774 551 2176 Maryport CA15 8ST Allerdale Childcare Providers Dean CE Primary School Dean Workington Dean CE Primary School 01946 861408 Workington CA14 4TH Ellenborough & Ewanrigg Infant School Pre School Ellenborough & Ewanrigg Infant School Victory Crescent Maryport 01900 812931 Pre School Maryport CA15 7NE Fellview Pre-School Nursery Group Fellview Primary School 016974 78437 Wigton Fellview Pre-School Nursery Group Caldbeck 0783 397 4014 Wigton CA7 8HF Footsteps Nursery Minto Centre Workington Footsteps Nursery Nilsson Drive 01900 872011 Workington CA14 5BD Allerdale Childcare Providers Grasslot Infant School Main Road Maryport Grasslot Infant School 01900 812268 Maryport CA15 8BT Happy Hours Private Day Nursery - Seaton 5 High Seaton Happy Hours Private Day Nursery - Seaton Seaton 01900 602962 Seaton Workington CA14 1NP Jack and Jill at St Mary's St Mary's Catholic Primary School Holden Road Workington Jack and Jill at St Mary's 01946 834867 Salterbeck Workington CA14 5LN Jelly Tots Solway Community Technology College Liddell Street Silloth Jelly Tots 016979
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 at Penrith Leisure Centre
    Cumbria County Archery Association Cumbria County Archery Association Annual General Meeting Minutes Held on 27th November 2016 at Penrith Leisure Centre. Those Present Name Club Name Club Simon Degler Sellafield AC Andy Carr Eagle Bowmen Stuart Burnett Sellafield AC Jamie Johnston Eagle Bowmen Christine Burnett Sellafield AC Rob Edmondson Keswick Chris Battersby Eagle Bowmen June Houghton Keswick Ru Lochlea Sellafield AC Dru Ridding Millom Archers Jim Skivington Sellafield AC Ashleigh Dixon Millom Archers Tony Tideswell Kendal Bowmen Sarah Knowles Millom Archers Malcolm Arnott Sellafield AC Andrew Ridding Millom Archers Derek Longrigg Maryport Robert Edmondson Keswick Jeff Higham Maryport June Houghton Keswick Derek Longrigg Maryport Apologies Roger Payne, Freya Wise, Gary Pimblett, Craig Benson. Minutes of the previous meeting The minutes of the previous AGM held on 29th November 2015 were reviewed for accuracy. These minutes were approved. Proposed: Simon. Seconded: Chris. Carried unanimously. Page 1 of 17 Maters Arising There were no other matters arising from the previous AGM . The actions from the previous AGM were reviewed. Action 37 about the Pentangle was discussed. See Actions list below. Correspondence See Appendix A below. Officers Reports – Chair - Simon Degler Again I’d like to thank all the County Officers for all the work they put into the running of CCAA. Because of their efforts my job becomes very easy. Thanks again to Chris as Tournament organiser for running all the shoots and helping us make some money which supports the spending on things like the hall hire for Squad sessions and travel to conferences etc. where necessary so that people aren’t out of pocket when on official business.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 2 Wind Energy Development Sites
    Cumbria Wind Energy Supplementary Planning Document Wind Energy Map 2 Regionally Significant Roads Bewcastle Development Sites Longtown This map should be read in conjunction with the Landscape Capacity Assessment Fundings in Part 2. A7 When considering the potential acceptibility of a scheme all other planning issues set out in the SPD must be considered. This map is indicative only. A74 Brampton Bowness A689 -on-Solway Hallbankgate Key Carlisle A69 Lake District National Park Operational Silloth 18 4 Cumwhinton Yorkshire Dales National Park 34 Abbeytown Dalston Solway Coast AONB Approved Wigton North Pennines AONB A596 Alston Arnside and Silverdale AONB Appeal A595 High Hesket 31 16 21 Frontiers of the Roman Empire: Aspatria 6 33 Hadrian’s Wall - visual envelope Refused Bothel Caldbeck A686 Calthwaite Lazonby St Bees Heritage Coastline Maryport 14 32 Cumbria County Council Boundary Application 2 Broughton 27 Langwathby Seaton 15 Cockermouth 5 1 Bassenthwaite Penrith Workington Great Clifton A66 Wind Energy Development - Operational Wind Energy Development - Refused 3 20 A66 8 Loweswater 1 Oldside 21 Hilltop Distington Derwent Keswick 2 Siddick 22 Whinash Wind Farm 24 Water Appleby Crummock 3 Winscales 23 Drigg Ullswater Whitehaven Thirlmere Shap 30 Brough 4 Great Orton 24 Fairfield Farm (2) Cleator Moor Buttermere 5 Swineside* 25 Gunson Height Ennerdale 6 Newlands Mill 26 Lowick Beacon 13 Haweswater St Bees Egremont A591 7 Haverigg 27 Lowick Common A595 Kirkby Stephen 8 Lowca 28 Barkin House 19 Grasmere 9 Harlock Hill 29 Firbank Fell
    [Show full text]