Bioaugmentation for Aerobic Bioremediation of RDX-Contaminated Groundwater

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bioaugmentation for Aerobic Bioremediation of RDX-Contaminated Groundwater FINAL REPORT Bioaugmentation for Aerobic Bioremediation of RDX-Contaminated Groundwater ESTCP Project ER-201207 JUNE 2016 Dr. Mandy Michalsen, P.E. US Army Engineer and Research Development Center Dr. Fiona Crocker Dr. Karl Indest Dr. Carina Jung US Army Engineer and Research Development Center Dr. Mark Fuller Dr. Paul Hatzinger CB&I Federal Services Jack Istok, P.E. School of Civil and Construction Engineering Distribution Statement A This document has been cleared for public release Page Intentionally Left Blank This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Page Intentionally Left Blank Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 01-06-2016 Technical Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER FINAL REPORT N/A Bioaugmentation for Aerobic Bioremediation of 5b. GRANT NUMBER RDX-Contaminated Groundwater ER-201207 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER N/A 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Mandy Michalsen; Fiona Crocker; Karl Indest; Carina Jung - ERDC 372856 Mark Fuller; Paul Hatzinger - CB&I Jonathan Istok - Oregon State University 5e. TASK NUMBER N/A 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER N/A 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION US Army Engineer and Research Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, REPORT NUMBER Vicksburg, MS 39180; CB&I Federal Services, 17 Princess Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648; Oregon State University, School of Civil & Const. Engineering, Corvallis, OR 3 N/A 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) ESTCP 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 17D08, Alexandria, VA 22350-3605 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT This project demonstrated an innovative application of bioaugmentation to enhance the biodegradation of hexahydro͈1,3,5͈trinitro͈ 1,3,5͈triazine (RDX) in contaminated groundwater under aerobic conditions. RDX is mobile and persistent in aerobic groundwater and typically forms large, dilute plumes that are difficult and costly to remediate using conventional technologies such as pump and treat or anaerobic biostimulation. The Umatilla Chemical Depot (UMCD) in Umatilla, OR was selected as the field site for this demonstration. The principal demonstration objectives were: (1) to select and optimize RDX-degrading microbial cultures for use in aerobic bioaugmentation at the UCMD, (2) to compare in situ RDX biodegradation rates for aerobic bioaugmentation to those for biostimulation, and (3) to quantify and compare costs of RDX. This final report presents a comprehensive summary of demonstration activities and results. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Bioaugmentation, groundwater, remediation, explosives, RDX 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE ABSTRACT OF Mandy Michalsen PAGES 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) 259 206-764-3324 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE DEMONSTRATION ..................................................................1 1.3 REGULATORY DRIVERS .............................................................................................2 2.0 TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................................................3 2.1 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................3 2.2 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE TECHNOLOGY ....................................3 3.0 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................5 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................9 4.1 SITE SELECTION .........................................................................................................9 4.2 SITE GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY ..........................................................................10 4.3 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION ..............................................................................12 5.0 TEST DESIGN ..................................................................................................................13 5.1 CONCEPTUAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ...............................................................13 5.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION .....................................................................................13 5.2.1 METHODS ...............................................................................................................14 5.2.2 RESULTS .................................................................................................................16 5.2.3 DISCUSSION ...........................................................................................................19 5.3 PHASE I LABORATORY TESTING ...........................................................................19 5.3.1 Bioaugmentation Culture Optimization .......................................................................20 5.3.2 Microcosm studies .....................................................................................................23 5.3.3 Column Transport Experiments ..................................................................................24 5.3.4 Field Scale Culture Production ...................................................................................29 5.3.5 Phase I Recommendations ..........................................................................................35 5.4 PHASE II FIELD-SCALE CELL TRANSPORT TESTING ...........................................35 5.4.1 METHODS ...............................................................................................................36 5.4.2 RESULTS .................................................................................................................38 5.4.3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PHASE II .................................41 5.5 PHASE III: BIOAUGMENTATION FIELD TRIAL AND PUSH-PULL TESTING ........42 5.5.1 METHODS ..............................................................................................................42 5.5.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................44 6.1 Quantitative Performance Objectives ..............................................................................50 6.2 Qualitative Performance Objectives ...............................................................................53 7.0 COST ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................54 7.1 COST MODEL .............................................................................................................54 7.2 COST DRIVERS ..........................................................................................................55 7.3 COST ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................57 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES .........................................................................................67 9.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................70 APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………………………....75 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. Demonstration performance objectives....................................................................6
Recommended publications
  • Thesis Sci 2007 Kirby B M.Pdf
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University The characterisation of actinomycetes isolated from diverse South African sources, with emphasis on the genus Kribbella by Town Cape Bronwyn Michelle Kirby of University Thesis Presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology F acuity of Science UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN August 2007 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my supervisor Dr Paul Meyers for the guidance, insight and motivation he provided for the duration of this project. I am grateful for his endless patience while writing my thesis. I wish to thank Di James for teaching me so much about DNA sequencing, Miranda Waldron for assistance with SEM, and Associate Professors Shez Reid and Val Abratt for the use of the anaerobic chamber. I am grateful to the Medical Research Council, National Research Foundation, the Ernst & Ethel Eriksen Trust, the Postgraduate Studies Funding Committee and the Postgraduate Association, UCT, for personal financial assistance. I would like to thank my Dad and Mom for all their support and for allowing me to follow my heart. Thanks to my Gran for her wisdom. Special thanks to my sister, Kerry, for all her help and encouragement. I would like to thank Marilize for her knowledge, friendship and for sharing my amazement in these 'handsome' bugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Actinobacteria Degrading and Tolerating Organic Pollutants and Tolerating Organic Pollutants
    Characterization of Actinobacteria Degrading Characterization of Actinobacteria Degrading and Tolerating Organic Pollutants and Tolerating Organic Pollutants Irina Tsitko Irina Tsitko Division of Microbiology Division of Microbiology Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry University of Helsinki University of Helsinki Academic Dissertation in Microbiology Academic Dissertation in Microbiology To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, for public criticism in Auditorium 1015 at Viikki Biocentre, University of Helsinki, for public criticism in Auditorium 1015 at Viikki Biocentre, Viikinkaari 5, on January 12th, 2007, at 12 o’clock noon. Viikinkaari 5, on January 12th, 2007, at 12 o’clock noon. Helsinki 2007 Helsinki 2007 Supervisor: Professor Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen Supervisor: Professor Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology University of Helsinki University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland Helsinki, Finland Reviewers Doctor Anja Veijanen Reviewers Doctor Anja Veijanen Department of Biological and Environmental Science Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, Finland Jyväskylä, Finland Docent Merja Kontro Docent Merja Kontro University of Helsinki University of Helsinki Department of Ecological and Environmental Sciences Department of Ecological and Environmental Sciences Lahti, Finland Lahti, Finland Opponent: Professor Edward R.B. Moore, Opponent: Professor Edward R.B. Moore, Department of Clinical Bacteriology Department of Clinical Bacteriology Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University Göteborg University Göteborg, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Actividad Formadora De Canales Transmembrana En La Superficie De Gordonia Jacobaea
    Actividad formadora de canales transm embrana en la superficie de Gordonia jacobaea Mª Guadalupe Jiménez Galisteo ADVERTIMENT . La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX ( www.tdx.cat ) i a través del Dipòsit Digital de la UB ( diposit.ub.edu ) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposici ó des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX ni al Dipòsit Digital de la UB . No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en un a finestra o marc aliè a TDX o al Dipòsit Digital de la UB (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona auto ra. ADVERTENCIA . La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR ( www.tdx.cat ) y a través del Repositorio Digital de la UB ( diposit.ub.edu ) ha sido au torizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR o al Repositorio Digital de la UB .
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 22 August 2018 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007 Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria Imen Nouioui 1†, Lorena Carro 1†, Marina García-López 2†, Jan P. Meier-Kolthoff 2, Tanja Woyke 3, Nikos C. Kyrpides 3, Rüdiger Pukall 2, Hans-Peter Klenk 1, Michael Goodfellow 1 and Markus Göker 2* 1 School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2 Department Edited by: of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Martin G. Klotz, Germany, 3 Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, United States Washington State University Tri-Cities, United States The application of phylogenetic taxonomic procedures led to improvements in the Reviewed by: Nicola Segata, classification of bacteria assigned to the phylum Actinobacteria but even so there remains University of Trento, Italy a need to further clarify relationships within a taxon that encompasses organisms of Antonio Ventosa, agricultural, biotechnological, clinical, and ecological importance. Classification of the Universidad de Sevilla, Spain David Moreira, morphologically diverse bacteria belonging to this large phylum based on a limited Centre National de la Recherche number of features has proved to be difficult, not least when taxonomic decisions Scientifique (CNRS), France rested heavily on interpretation of poorly resolved 16S rRNA gene trees. Here, draft *Correspondence: Markus Göker genome sequences
    [Show full text]
  • Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-Rc1
    Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-rc1 Joel Berendzen, Judith Cohn, Nicolas Hengartner, Mira Dimitrijevic, Benjamin McMahon January 06, 2016 Contents 1 Copyright notice 1 2 Introduction to Sequedex 3 2.1 What is Sequedex?............................................3 2.2 What does Sequedex do?.........................................3 2.3 How is Sequedex different from other sequence analysis packages?..................4 2.4 Who uses Sequedex?...........................................4 2.5 How is Sequedex used with other software?...............................5 2.6 How does Sequedex work?........................................5 2.7 Sequedex’s outputs............................................8 3 Installation instructions 15 3.1 System requirements........................................... 16 3.2 Downloading and unpacking for Mac.................................. 16 3.3 Downloading and unpacking for Linux................................. 17 3.4 Downloading and unpacking for Windows 7 or 8............................ 17 3.5 Using Sequedex with Cygwin installed under Windows......................... 19 3.6 Installation and updates without network access............................. 20 3.7 Testing your installation......................................... 20 3.8 Running Sequedex on an example data file............................... 20 3.9 Obtaining a node-locked license file................................... 21 3.10 Installing new data modules and upgrading Sequedex - User-installs.................. 21 3.11 Installing new data modules
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Metabolic Potential of a Pilot-Scale Microbial Community
    Population dynamics and metabolic potential of a pilot-scale microbial community performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal by CHRISTOPHER EVAN LAWSON B.A.Sc. (Civil Engineering), University of British Columbia, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Civil Engineering) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2014 © Christopher Evan Lawson, 2014 Abstract Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is an environmental biotechnology of global importance, essential for protecting receiving waters from eutrophication and enabling phosphorus recovery. Current understanding of EBPR is largely based on empirical evidence and black-box models that fail to appreciate the driving force responsible for nutrient cycling and ultimate phosphorus removal, namely microbial communities. Accordingly, this thesis focused on understanding the microbial ecology of a pilot-scale microbial community performing EBPR to better link bioreactor processes to underlying microbial agents. Initially, temporal changes in microbial community structure and activity were monitored in a pilot-scale EBPR treatment plant by examining the ratio of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) to SSU rRNA gene over a 120-day study period. Although the majority of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the EBPR ecosystem were rare, many maintained high potential activities, suggesting that rare OTUs made significant contributions to protein synthesis potential. Few significant differences in OTU abundance and activity were observed between bioreactor redox zones, although differences in temporal activity were observed among phylogenetically cohesive OTUs. Moreover, observed temporal activity patterns could not be explained by measured process parameters, suggesting that alternate ecological forces shaped community interactions in the bioreactor milieu.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation
    VU Research Portal Diversity and functions of bacteria associated with springtails Agamennone, V. 2018 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Agamennone, V. (2018). Diversity and functions of bacteria associated with springtails. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Diversity and functions of bacteria associated with springtails Valeria Agamennone This research was financed by grant F07.003.05 from the BE-Basic Foundation (Biotechnology based Ecologically Balanced Sustainable Industrial Consortium). Thesis of the Department of Ecological Science, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Layout and cover by Valeria Agamennone, printing by Ipskamp. VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Diversity and functions of bacteria associated with springtails ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor of Philosophy aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ID 10 | Issue No: 2.2 | Issue Date: 28.10.16 | Page: 1 of 27 © Crown Copyright 2016 Identification of Aerobic Actinomycetes
    UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations Identification of aerobic actinomycetes Issued by the Standards Unit, Microbiology Services, PHE Bacteriology – Identification | ID 10 | Issue no: 2.2 | Issue date: 28.10.16 | Page: 1 of 27 © Crown copyright 2016 Identification of aerobic actinomycetes Acknowledgments UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations (SMIs) are developed under the auspices of Public Health England (PHE) working in partnership with the National Health Service (NHS), Public Health Wales and with the professional organisations whose logos are displayed below and listed on the website https://www.gov.uk/uk- standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality-and-consistency-in-clinical- laboratories. SMIs are developed, reviewed and revised by various working groups which are overseen by a steering committee (see https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/standards-for-microbiology-investigations- steering-committee). The contributions of many individuals in clinical, specialist and reference laboratories who have provided information and comments during the development of this document are acknowledged. We are grateful to the medical editors for editing the medical content. For further information please contact us at: Standards Unit Microbiology Services Public Health England 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://www.gov.uk/uk-standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality- and-consistency-in-clinical-laboratories UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations are produced in association with: Logos correct at time of publishing. Bacteriology – Identification | ID 10 | Issue no: 2.2 | Issue date: 28.10.16 | Page: 2 of 27 UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations | Issued by the Standards Unit, Public Health England Identification of aerobic actinomycetes Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Style Document
    The Heterogeneity of Amine Oxidase within Rhodococcus opacus Alexander Foster Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Heriot-Watt University School of Engineering and Physical Sciences Department of Chemical Engineering March 2013 The copyright in this thesis is owned by the author. Any quotation from the thesis or use of any of the information contained in it must acknowledge this thesis as the source of the quotation or information. Abstract Four native amine oxidases have been identified from Rhodococcus opacus to reveal phenotypic plasticity and catalytic activity with respect to structurally diverse natural and synthetic amines. Altering the amine growth substrate enabled tailored and targeted oxidase upregulation, facilitating catalytic differentiation and isolation. Each enzyme was purified over 80 fold by chromatography, allowing subsequent characterisation. Two oxidases possessed a copper dependent redox co-factor with broad specificity towards monoamines. Michaelis constants (KM) ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 mM for common C1–C5 aliphatic monoamines and <0.2 mM for a range of aromatic amines. The remaining two oxidases by contrast were highly specific for aliphatic diamines, with a Michaelis constants (KM) = 60 µM for putrescine by a third copper oxidase and a (KM) = 190 µM by a flavin dependent oxidase. MALDI-TOF and genomic analysis has indicated metabolic gene clusters, multiple gene activation, and complex biodegradation pathways. With a consideration of the diamine acting oxidase, a putrescine degradation pathway is confirmed that utilises oxidases in tandem with a 4-aminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase. The taxonomic distribution of this pathway is further examined utilising phylogenetic analysis. Oxidase regulation and integration into the nitrogen cycle is then considered, with implications in bioremediation and biocatalysis discussed.
    [Show full text]