DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Revised Final Land and Resource

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Revised Final Land and Resource United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Final Land and Southwestern Region Resource Management MB-R3-04-20 May 2017 Plan for the Coconino National Forest Coconino, Gila, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Printed on recycled paper – month 2017 Final Land and Resource Management Plan for the Coconino National Forest Coconino, Gila, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Preface This final land and resource management plan (also called the plan) aims to promote responsible land management for the Coconino National Forest (Coconino NF) based on useful and current information and guidance. This plan replaces the previous forest plan, originally adopted in 1987. Land management planning guides the Forest Service in fulfilling its responsibilities for the stewardship of the forest and to best meet the needs of the American people. This plan provides strategic guidance and information for project and activity decisionmaking on the Coconino NF for approximately the next 15 years. This plan was developed collaboratively and is the result of years of iterative discussions and feedback. Comments received were used to modify and refine the plan. Both the plan and the associated FEIS can be found electronically on the Coconino NF Web site at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/coconino/landmanagement/planning/ Detailed assessments, evaluations, reports, and documents associated with development of the plan can also be viewed and downloaded from the Coconino NF Forest Plan Revision Web site. Final Land and Resource Management Plan for the Coconino NF i Contents Coconino, Gila, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona .................................................................................... i Preface .............................................................................................................................................. i Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... vii Commonly Used Acronyms ............................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1. Background .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Land Management Plan .................................................................................................. 1 Summary of the Analysis of the Management Situation ....................................................................... 1 Recreation........................................................................................................................................... 2 Condition and Trends ..................................................................................................................... 2 Community-Forest Interaction ........................................................................................................... 3 Condition and Trends ..................................................................................................................... 3 Maintenance and Improvement of Ecosystem Health ........................................................................ 3 Condition and Trends ..................................................................................................................... 3 Other Needs for Change ..................................................................................................................... 4 Climate Change Concerns .................................................................................................................. 4 Plan Content ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Plan Decisions .................................................................................................................................... 5 Other Content ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................... 9 Guiding Future Projects, Program Plans, and Assessments ................................................................... 9 Transition in the Implementation of the Plan ....................................................................................... 10 Future Changes to the Plan ................................................................................................................... 10 Roles and Contributions of the Coconino NF ....................................................................................... 11 The Coconino National Forest’s Mission ......................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2. Forestwide Management ........................................................................................... 17 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 17 All Ecosystems ................................................................................................................................. 17 Air Quality........................................................................................................................................ 18 Soil ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Biophysical Features ........................................................................................................................ 22 Geological Features ..................................................................................................................... 22 Paleontological Resources ........................................................................................................... 25 Watersheds and Water ...................................................................................................................... 27 Constructed Waters .......................................................................................................................... 30 Riparian Areas .................................................................................................................................. 31 All Riparian Areas ....................................................................................................................... 31 Stream Ecosystems ...................................................................................................................... 33 Wetlands ...................................................................................................................................... 35 Springs ......................................................................................................................................... 36 Riparian Forest Types .................................................................................................................. 38 Terrestrial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Conant 1965 Misc Not
    1 4hieiicanJizseum 1\ox4tates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2205 JANUARY 29, I 965 Miscellaneous Notes and Comments on Toads, Lizards, and Snakes from Mexico BY ROGER CONANT' INTRODUCTION Despite the surge of interest during recent years in the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico, great gaps still exist in our knowledge of what has proved to be one of the richest herpetofaunas in the world. We lack knowledge especially of the more secretive species that are active above ground only for short periods after heavy rains. Every herpetologist who works extensively in Mexico soon accumulates a series of specimens that represent range extensions, exhibit noteworthy variations in scutellation, coloration, or pattern, or contribute in other ways to our general store of information. Our expeditions to Mexico during the summers of 1959 to 1962, inclusive, yielded similar by-products to our main interest in snakes of the genus Natrix, and notes and comments on several of the more important of these are presented herewith. The present paper also includes photographs of live animals of several species almost all of which have not previously been illustrated or have been depicted only by draw- ings or by photographs of preserved, often distorted, specimens. Virtually all our material, except samples sent to Mexico in compliance with collecting permit requirements, has been deposited in the American 1 Research Associate, Department of Herpetology, the American Museum of Natural History; Curator of Reptiles, Philadelphia Zoological Garden. 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2205 Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Town of Marana Habitat Conservation Plan March 2009
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Town of Marana Habitat Conservation Plan March 2009 Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Department of the Interior and Town of Marana Town of Marana Habitat Conservation Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Page intentionally left blank. March 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Town of Marana Habitat Conservation Plan March 2009 Prepared for Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service RECON Environmental, Inc. 201 North Bonita, Suite 141 1927 Fifth Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85741 San Diego, California 92101-2358 Contact: Scott Richardson P 619.308.9333 F 619.308.9334; 525 West Wetmore Road, Suite 111 and Tucson, Arizona 85705 P 520.325.9977 F 520.293.3051 Town of Marana RECON Number 4476E 11555 West Civic Center Drive Marana, Arizona 85653 Contact: Jennifer Christelman ABSTRACT The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is considering issuance of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to the Town of Marana (Town). The ITP would authorize the incidental take of species protected by the ESA associated with the Town’s capital improvement projects (CIP) and discretionary activities, and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The species addressed in the Section 10(a)(1)(B) ITP application include western burrowing owl, cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl, southwestern willow flycatcher, western yellow-billed cuckoo, lesser long-nosed bat, Merriam’s mesquite mouse, pale Townsend’s big-eared bat, ground snake, Mexican garter snake, Sonoran desert tortoise, Tucson shovel-nosed snake, lowland leopard frog, and talus snail.
    [Show full text]
  • Thamnophis Cyrtopsis (Kennicott) Black-Necked Garter Snake
    245.1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE THAMNOPHIS CYRTOPSIS Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. subspecies may intergrade with T. c. pulchrilatus, in some places providing three-way intergradation; only one region of intergra• WEBB, ROBERTG. 1980. Thamnophis eyrtopsis. dation involving any two or three of these subspecies is indicated on the distribution map. Thamnophis cyrtopsis (Kennicott) • FOSSIL RECORD. None has been definitely assigned to T. Black-necked garter snake cyrtopsis. Holman (1968, 1970)discussed material as possibly rep• resenting T. cyrtopsis, but noted the difficulty in distinguishing E[utaenia]. eyrtopsis Kennicott, 1860:333. Type-locality, "Rin• species of Thamnophis. In discussions comparing fossil Tham• conada Coahuila, Mexico," determined as approximately 20 nophis vertebrae Auffenberg (1963:197) and Rogers (1976:190) miles northeast of Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, just across state commented on vertebrae of modern T. cyrtopsis. line in Nuevo Leon by Conant (1968:10; map, p. 2). Holotype, National Museum of Natural History 8067 (formerly No. 920), • PERTINENTLITERATURE.Milstead (1953) and Webb (1966, adult male, collected by Lieut. Darius Nash Couch in 1853 1978) treated intraspecific relationships. Bibliographic citations (not examined by author). are in Wright and Wright (1957) and for Texas in Raun and Gehl• Thamnophis eyrtopsis: Cope, 1861:299. bach (1972); references cited by them are omitted below. Brief [Tropidonotus ordinatus] Var. eques (nee Reuss): Boulenger, statements regarding morphology and/or habits and habitat in 1893:209. Misapplication of name. See NOMENCLATURALArizona are in Coues (1875), Ruthven (1907), Van Denburgh and HISTORY. Slevin (1918), Van Denburgh (1922), Ortenburger and Ortenburg• Eutaenia eques (nee Reuss): Cope, 1896:1009. er (1927), Gloyd (1937), Woodin (1953), Gates (1957), Lowe (1964), [Thamnophis] eques (nee Reuss): Ruthven, 1908:158.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic and Riparian Herpetofauna of Las Cienegas National Conservation Area, Empire-Cienega Ranch, Pima County, Arizona
    AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HERPETOFAUNA OF LAS CIENEGAS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA, EMPIRE-CIENEGA RANCH, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Philip C. Rosen, Assistant Research Scientist School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 520-621-3187 ph 520-670-5001 fax [email protected] and Dennis J. Caldwell, Caldwell Design 2109 N 2nd Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85705 [email protected] Final Report to: Bureau of Land Management Tucson Office 12661 East Broadway Tucson, AZ 85748 For Cooperative Agreement AAA000011 Task Order No. 6 (BLM, AZ State Office – CESU-FLPMA, University of Arizona) AZ068-1120-BV-SSSS-25-2B 1 September 2004 LAS CIENEGAS AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HERPETOFAUNA – ROSEN & CALDWELL 2004 2 Aquatic and Riparian Herpetofauna of Las Cienegas National Conservation Area, Empire-Cienega Ranch, Pima County, Arizona 1 September 2004 Philip C. Rosen and Dennis J. Caldwell Executive Summary Las Cienegas National Conservation Area encompasses the Empire and Cienega ranches, including the headwaters and intact cienega-stream of Cienega Creek. This area supports the most intact natural major valley bottom wetland in Arizona, and provides a window to the original environment of other valleys in southeastern Arizona. We intensively inventoried the amphibians and reptiles of the cienega and its riparian environs, and extensively surveyed those in the surrounding xeroriparian and upland environments. These environments, not including species in outlying, rocky environments, support a rich herpetofauna with 38 species verified and an expected
    [Show full text]
  • Fws-R2-Es-2008-0065]
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [FWS-R2-ES-2008-0065] [MO 9221050083-B2] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Northern Mexican Gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops) as Threatened or Endangered with Critical Habitat AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 12-month finding on a petition to list the northern Mexican gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops) as threatened or endangered with critical habitat under the Endangered Species 2 Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The petitioners provided three listing options for consideration by the Service: (1) listing the U. S. population as a Distinct Population Segment (DPS); (2) listing Thamnophis eques megalops throughout its range in the United States and Mexico based on its rangewide status; or (3) listing Thamnophis eques megalops throughout its range in the United States and Mexico based on its status in the United States. On the basis of the best scientific and commercial information available, we find that listing the northern Mexican gartersnake as threatened or endangered throughout its range in the United States and Mexico, based on its rangewide status, is warranted under the Act, due to the present or threatened destruction, modification or curtailment of its habitat; predation; and the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. Currently, listing is precluded by higher priority actions to amend the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Upon publication of this 12-month petition finding, the northern Mexican gartersnake will be added to our candidate species list.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Used in the Analysis for The
    Literature Used in the Analysis for the Proposed Rule to List the Northern Mexican (Thamnophis eques megalops) and Narrow-headed (Thamnophis rufipunctatus) Gartersnakes and Designate Proposed Critical Habitat under the Endangered Species Act Abarca, F. J. and D. Weedman. 1993. Native fishes of Tonto Creek, Tonto National Forest, Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department Technical Report. Phoenix, Arizona. 51 pp. Abbate, D., A. Stingelin, and S. Lowery. 2007. Mexican gartersnake surveys along the lower Santa Cruz River Corridor: Arizona Army National Guard Silverbell / Marana Training Area in Pima County. Report submitted to Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs, Arizona Army National Guard. 13 pp. Adams, M. J., C. A. Pearl, and R. B. Bury. 2003. Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecology Letters (6):343-351. Akins, C. 2012. E-mail correspondence from Christina Akins (Arizona Game and Fish Department) (June 22, 2012; 1813 hrs). Alfaro, M. E. 2002. Forward attack modes of aquatic feeding garter snakes. Functional Ecology 16:2004-215. Alvarez-Torres, P., A. Díaz-de-León-Corral, O. Ramírez-Flores, and E. Bermúdez-Rodríguez. 2002. National fisheries chart 2000: a new instrument for fisheries management in inland waters. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 12:317-326. American Rivers. 2006. Verde River among America’s “Most Endangered”. Available at: http://www.americanrivers.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8501&security=1&ne ws_iv_ctrl=1137 Amin, O.M. 1969. Helminth fauna of suckers (Catostomidae) of the Gila River System, Arizona. American Midland Naturalist 82(2): 429-443. Andrews K. M. and J. W.
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords
    FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords 29,958 entries as KEYWORD (PARENT) Descriptive phrase AB (CANADA) Alberta ABEESC (PLANTS) Abelmoschus esculentus, okra ABEGRA (PLANTS) Abelia × grandiflora [chinensis × uniflora], glossy abelia ABERT'S SQUIRREL (MAMMALS) Sciurus alberti ABERT'S TOWHEE (BIRDS) Pipilo aberti ABIABI (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella abietina, abietinella moss ABIALB (PLANTS) Abies alba, European silver fir ABIAMA (PLANTS) Abies amabilis, Pacific silver fir ABIBAL (PLANTS) Abies balsamea, balsam fir ABIBIF (PLANTS) Abies bifolia, subalpine fir ABIBRA (PLANTS) Abies bracteata, bristlecone fir ABICON (PLANTS) Abies concolor, white fir ABICONC (ABICON) Abies concolor var. concolor, white fir ABICONL (ABICON) Abies concolor var. lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIDUR (PLANTS) Abies durangensis, Coahuila fir ABIES SPP. (PLANTS) firs ABIETINELLA SPP. (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella spp., mosses ABIFIR (PLANTS) Abies firma, Japanese fir ABIFRA (PLANTS) Abies fraseri, Fraser fir ABIGRA (PLANTS) Abies grandis, grand fir ABIHOL (PLANTS) Abies holophylla, Manchurian fir ABIHOM (PLANTS) Abies homolepis, Nikko fir ABILAS (PLANTS) Abies lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILASA (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, corkbark fir ABILASB (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. bifolia, subalpine fir ABILASL (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILOW (PLANTS) Abies lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIMAG (PLANTS) Abies magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGM (ABIMAG) Abies magnifica var. magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGS (ABIMAG) Abies
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican Garter Snake, Thamnophis Eques Megalops, As an Endangered Or Threatened Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    Petition to list the Mexican Garter Snake, Thamnophis eques megalops, as an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act Center for Biological Diversity Petitioner December 2003 December 15, 2003 Ms. Gale Norton CC: Dale Hall Secretary of the Interior Head of Southwest Region Office of the Secretary US Fish and Wildlife Service Department of the Interior 500 Gold Ave. SW 18th and "C" Street, N.W. Albuquerque, NM 87102 Washington, D.C. 20240 Ms. Norton, The Center for Biological Diversity hereby formally petitions to list the Mexican Garter Snake (Thamnophis eques megalops) as threatened or endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. (ESA). This petition is filed under 5 U.S.C. 553(e) and 50 CFR 424.14 (1990), which grants interested parties the right to petition for issue of a rule from the Assistant Secretary of the Interior. The petitioner also requests that Critical Habitat be designated concurrent with the listing, as required by 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(6)(C) and 50 CFR 424.12, and pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). The grounds for this petition are documented population declines, decreased range, and local extirpations of the Mexican garter snake. Petitioners believe the Mexican garter snake warrants endangered or threatened status on the ESA based on its current population status and significant threats. Threats throughout its range include: loss of wetlands, urbanization, habitat alteration, pollution, livestock grazing, loss of native prey species, and exotic species predation. The USFWS has three options for listing the Mexican garter snake under the ESA: (1) listing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Niche Modeling; Present and Future Potential Distribution of Garter Snakes Species from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 11 April 2018. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/4618), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. González-Fernández A, Manjarrez J, García-Vázquez U, D’Addario M, Sunny A. 2018. Present and future ecological niche modeling of garter snake species from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. PeerJ 6:e4618 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4618 Environmental niche modeling; present and future potential distribution of garter snakes species from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt Andrea González Fernández 1 , Javier Manjarrez Corresp., 1 , Uri García-Vázquez 2 , Maristella D’Addario 3 , Armando Sunny 3 1 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México 2 Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Ciudad de México, México 3 Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México Corresponding Author: Javier Manjarrez Email address: [email protected] Land-use and climate change are affecting the abundance and distribution of species. The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) is a very diverse region due to geological history, geographic position and climate, however, is one of the most disturbed regions in Mexico. Reptiles are particularly sensitive to environmental changes due to their low dispersal capacity and thermal ecology. In this study, we define the environmental niche (a part of it; considering climatic, topographic and land use variables) and potential distribution (present and future) of the five Thamnophis species present in TMVB.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Desert Research Center
    Schmidt, Powell, & Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Tuzigoot National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Tuzigoot National Monument Inventory of Tuzigoot Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1347 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1347 October 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Tuzigoot National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Brian F. Powell, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1347 October 2005 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station U.S. Department of the Interior University of Arizona U.S. Geological Survey School of Natural Resources 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C.A., B.F. Powell, B.F., W.L. Halvorson. 2005. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Tuzigoot National Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Thamnophis Eques Megalops) in North-Central Arizona
    ARTICLES 555 MACEY, J. R., AND T. J. PAPENFUSS. 1991. Reptiles. In C. A. Hall, Jr. (ed.), RodgERs, t. L., ANd h. s. FitCh. 1947. Variation in the skinks (Reptilia: Natural History of the White-Inyo Range, Eastern California, pp. Lacertilia) of the Skiltonianus group. Univ. California Publ. Zool. 291–360. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 48:169–220. MEdiCA, p. A., o. L. hAwoRth, ANd M. s. Kelly. 1990. Eumeces gilberti SOULE, D. A. 2006. Climatology of the Nevada Test Site. SORD Technical rubricaudatus. Herpetol. Rev. 21:40. Memorandum, SORD 2006-3, National Oceanic and Atmospheric MoRRisoN, M. L., p. A. AigNER, L. A. NoRdstRoM, ANd L. s. hALL. 1999. Administration, Special Operations and Research Division, Las Habitat characteristics of sympatric Gilbert’s and western skinks. Vegas, Nevada. 165 pp. Herpetol Rev. 30:18–20. STEBBINS, R. C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. ———, ANd L. s. hALL. 1999. Habitat relationships of amphibians and 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York, New York. 533 pp. reptiles in the Inyo-White Mountains, California and Nevada. In tANNER, w. w. 1957. A taxonomic and ecological Study of the western S. B. Monsen and R. Stevens (comps.) Proceedings: Ecology and skink (Eumeces skiltonianus). Great Basin Nat. 17:59–94. Management of Pinyon-Juniper Communities within the Interior ———, ANd C. d. JoRgENsEN. 1963. Reptiles of the Nevada Test Site. West, pp. 233–237. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull., Biol. Ser. 3(3), 31 pp. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proc-RMRS-P-9, Ogden, Utah.
    [Show full text]