DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Physical and Chemical Data for Water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Dam Releases, Utah-Arizona, 1964–2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Physical and Chemical Data for Water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Dam Releases, Utah-Arizona, 1964–2013 I Report Title Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Historical Physical and Chemical Data for Water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Dam Releases, Utah-Arizona, 1964–2013 Data Series 471 Version 3.0, February 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Photograph of the San Juan River arm of Lake Powell downstream of Wilson Creek, Utah (USGS photograph by William Vernieu.) Historical Physical and Chemical Data for Water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Dam Releases, Utah-Arizona, 1964–2013 By William S. Vernieu Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Data Series 471 Version 3.0, February 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia First release: 2009 Revised: October 2013 (ver. 2.0) Revised: February 2015 (ver. 3.0) For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http//www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS (1-888-275-8747) For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Vernieu, W.S., 2015, Historical physical and chemical data for water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Dam releases, Utah-Arizona, 1964–2013 (ver. 3.0, February 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 471, 23 p., http:// dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds471. ISSN 2327-638X (online) iii Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Physical and Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................1 Hydrologic History ................................................................................................................................3 Information Sources and Monitoring History ..................................................................................4 Goals and Objectives of Monitoring Program .........................................................................4 Monitoring History .......................................................................................................................5 Phase 1 .................................................................................................................................5 Phase 2 .................................................................................................................................5 Phase 3 .................................................................................................................................5 Phase 4—Current Monitoring Program ..........................................................................5 Quarterly Reservoir-Wide Sampling .......................................................................5 Monthly Forebay Sampling ......................................................................................5 Tailwater Monitoring .................................................................................................6 Field Methods .................................................................................................................................................6 Sample Locations and Site Identification .........................................................................................7 Initial Observations ...............................................................................................................................9 Physicochemical Profiles ....................................................................................................................9 Objectives......................................................................................................................................9 Historical Methods, 1964–90 ....................................................................................................10 Current Methods, 1990–2013 .............................................................................................................10 Chemical Sampling and Processing ................................................................................................11 Objectives....................................................................................................................................11 Historical Methods, 1964–90 ....................................................................................................11 Current Methods, 1990–2013 ....................................................................................................11 Sample Collection .............................................................................................................11 Sample Filtration ...............................................................................................................12 Preservation ......................................................................................................................12 Transportation and Shipment ..........................................................................................12 Documentation ..................................................................................................................12 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ..........................................................................................12 Blank Samples ..................................................................................................................12 Replicate Samples ...........................................................................................................13 Known-Addition Samples ................................................................................................13 Analytical Methods ...................................................................................................................13 The WQDB ....................................................................................................................................................13 Site Locations ......................................................................................................................................14 Site Visits ..............................................................................................................................................15 Secchi-depth Transparency ..............................................................................................................15 Physical Profiles..................................................................................................................................15 Chemical Analyses .............................................................................................................................15 Sample Catalog ..........................................................................................................................15 iv Alkalinity Determinations .........................................................................................................15 Major Ion Concentrations ........................................................................................................15 Nutrient Concentrations ...........................................................................................................15 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................16 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................16 Appendix—Database Table Descriptions ...............................................................................................18 Stations Table ......................................................................................................................................18 Surface Table .......................................................................................................................................18 Secchi Table ........................................................................................................................................19 Profiles Table .......................................................................................................................................20 Samples Table .....................................................................................................................................20 Alkalinity Table ....................................................................................................................................21 Major Ions Table .................................................................................................................................21 Nutrients Table ....................................................................................................................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
    [Show full text]
  • Alterna`Ve Views of Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Rift
    Parks from Space:Parks from Space: Alternave Views of Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Ri Parklands Using Remote Sensing Imagery and Astronaut Photographs Joseph F. Reese, Geosciences Department, Edinboro University of PA • In this presenta,on, I will show several parklands of the Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Ri: from a dis,nctly alterna,ve perspec,ve ‐‐ Space. Remote sensing imagery and astronaut photographs give a unique view of some of our con,nent's most recognizable landscapes. Rocky Mountains Tectonic Map of North America, (from the Space Shule) Central Rocky Mountains PHOTOGRAPHS and IMAGES OBTAINED FROM: EARTH SCIENCES AND IMAGE ANALYSIS LAB: “The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth” hp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov (several capons are from this source) Space Shule and Internaonal Space Staon photographs taken by astronauts EARTH OBSERVATORY / VISIBLE EARTH: hp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov (some capons are from this source) hp://visibleearth.nasa.gov (some capons are from this source) satellite imagery from Landsat 7, MODIS, MISR, SeaWIFS Jet Propulsion Lab – ASTER: hp://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ FIELD and AERIAL PHOTOS and FIGURES from: Yann Arthus‐Bertrand, Russ Finley, Lou Maher, John Shelton, Chernicoff (text), Plummer and McGeary (text), Tarbuck and Lutgens (text), United States Geological Survey, and various other texts and websites! Physiographic Map of the Lower 48 States, USA Colorado Plateau Colorado Plateau Locaon map of Naonal Parks in Western U.S. This natural‐color image combines data from over 500 Mul‐angle Imaging Spectro‐Radiometer (MISR) orbits with shaded relief Digital Terrain ElevaGon models from the ShuDle Radar Topography Western Mission (SRTM) and other North America sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost World of Glen Canyon
    - r f 1 / I / I / r llS^ *&v . .".•*' : '•.-• - :•:-.*« •••• '•• i^g. i. A large sandstone arch called Galloway Cave existed on the right bank about 2.25 miles upstream from Glen Canyon Dam. River travelers camped here before the turn of the century and seemed always to build their campfires in the same place, at the downstream corner of the arch. Many also left a record of their presence by uniting their names on the wall with a piece of charcoal. This view shows a Nevills river party preparing for dinner on June 11, 1949. Lake Powell covers this site. Photographs, except Fig. 4, are courtesy of author. The Lost World of Glen Canyon BY P. T. REILLY THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE CRUISE THE SURFACE OF Lake Powell never dream­ ing of the wonders beneath the waters, features that are not likely to be exposed again in our lifetime, nor in those of our children or grandchildren. In fact, they may never be seen again. This photo­ graphic collection of landforms will serve as a reminder that our world changes as dramatically in the vertical as it does in the horizontal. Mr. Reilly lives in Sun City, Arizona. Readers may wish to refer to the following: Plan and Profile, Colorado River, Lees Ferry, Arizona, to Mouth of Green River, Utah, Sheet B; Navajo Mountain, Utah- Arizona quadrangle; Lake Canyon, Utah quadrangle; and Mancos Mesa, Utah quadrangle. The Lost World of Glen Canyon 123 Lee's Ferry occupies a unique and important position on the Colorado River because the 1921 measurement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Powell Mansour Sharifzadeh, (E-Mail: [email protected]), California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
    Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2007 Volume 3, Number 2 Lake Powell Mansour Sharifzadeh, (E-mail: [email protected]), California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ABSTRACT The purpose of the “Lake Powell’ case is to help students of Strategic Management learn the process of strategic management. This case can provide an opportunity for the students to learn strategy formulation and implementation along with some of the current issues such as “cooking the books”. Some sections of the Lake Powell case are real life situations, but all of the numbers and most of operations information are fictitious. Four experienced and knowledgeable men started Lake Powell Company with many opportunities and strength. However the company has lost money in the last five years. Students analyze, formulate and write an implementation of a strategy to save this company. Students then try to answer the following questions. What should be the proposed plan to Richmond for the Marina in order to have an effective, efficient, and profitable operation? How would it be funded? However the instructor will look at other scenarios and ask the students to figure out the four partner’s real goal. THE SETTING ake Powell is located between the borderline of Arizona and Utah along the Colorado River. It has a spectacular scenery view from Grand Canyon, vivid pink sunset, to a full night of stars. The possibilities L of fishing, skiing, or living in the houseboat on the brilliant blue water are other options to consider. It is nearly two thousand miles of shoreline, 96 major canyons, countless coves and winding waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Road Again! from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas 11 Days / 10 Nights Utah Awaits
    On the road again! From Salt Lake City to Las Vegas 11 days / 10 nights Utah Awaits The beautiful state of Utah can boast 3.5 distinct geographic regions, five national parks, 45 state parks, 5 national historic sites & trails, and a dozen national monuments & recreation areas. During this road trip*, from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas, you will live unique experiences along with amazing stays that connect you with nature and your loved ones, in off-the-grid settings in the heart of America’s West. Can’t Miss Highlights: Park City Moab and Arches National Park Lake Powell Zion National Park Bryce Canyon Monument Valley * Self driven or accompanied by one our Field agents (concierge/driver for the trip) The Lodge at Blue Sky 2 nit Wanship, Utah (50min drive from Salt Lake City airport) From the desert to lush green hills of The Lodge at Blue Sky. Reconnect with nature at this true Western getaway to a private 3500-acre ranch in Utah. Paddle Board Yoga in a 10,000 Year Old Hot Spring Park City The Experience: Travel underground and join your guide Julia for a private and therapeutic practice in the thermal waters of the Homestead Crater. Don’t be worried to fall as you will be warmed by the 95 degree mineral water! The Setting: Immerse yourself in a 10,000 year old cave, with delicate light beams streaming in and turquoise water. The Guide: Allow Julia to lead you through a delicate and sometimes challenging routine. She has been a local and expert guide of the area for over the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP, Arizona and Utah
    Contents Glen Canyon Unit ............................................................................................................................2 Project Location...................................................................................................................3 Historic Setting ....................................................................................................................4 Project Authorization .........................................................................................................8 Pre-Construction ................................................................................................................14 Construction.......................................................................................................................21 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water.......................................................................31 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................36 Notes ..................................................................................................................................39 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................46 Index ..................................................................................................................................52 Glen Canyon Unit The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Retrospective Analysis of Water Temperature Data and Larval And
    FINAL Retrospective analysis of water temperature data and larval and young of year fish collections in the San Juan River downstream from Navajo Dam to Lake Powell Utah Prepared for: Ecosystems Research Institute Logan, Utah And U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Salt Lake City, Utah Prepared by: William J. Miller And Kristin M. Swaim Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc PO Box 1383 Bozeman, Montana 59771 February 14, 2017 Final San Juan River Water Temperature Retrospective Report February 14, 2017 Executive Summary Miller Ecological Consultants conducted a retrospective analysis of existing San Juan River water temperature datasets and larval fish data. Water temperature data for all years available were evaluated in conjunction with the timing and number of larvae captured in the annual larval fish monitoring surveys that are required by the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRBRIP) Long Range Plan. Under the guidance of the SJRBRIP, Navajo Dam experimental releases were conducted and evaluated from 1992-1998. After this research period, the SJRBRIP completed the flow recommendations. The SJRBRIP established flow recommendations for the San Juan River designed to maintain or improve habitat for endangered Colorado Pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius and Razorback Sucker Xyrauchen texanus by modifying reservoir release patterns from Navajo Dam (Holden 1999). The flow recommendations were designed to mimic the natural hydrograph or flow regime in terms of magnitude, duration and frequency of flows. Water is released from the deep hypolimnetic zone of the reservoir, which results in water temperatures that are cooler than natural, pre-dam conditions. Water temperatures in the San Juan River have been monitored and recorded at several locations as part of the SJRBRIP since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Circle
    Salt Lake City Green River - Moab Salt Lake City - Green River 60min (56mile) Grand Junction 180min (183mile) Colorado Crescent Jct. NM Great Basin Green River NP Arches NP Moab - Arches Goblin Valley 10min (5mile) SP Corona Arch Moab Grand Circle Map Capitol Reef - Green River Dead Horse Point 100min (90mile) SP Moab - Grand View Point NP: National Park 80min (45mile) NM: National Monument NHP: National Histrocal Park Bryce Canyon - Capitol Reef Canyonlands SP: State Park Capitol Reef COLORADO 170min (123mile) NP NP Moab - Mesa Verde Monticello Moab - Monument Valley 170min (140mile) NEVADA UTAH 170min (149mile) Bryce Cedar City Canyon NP Natural Bridges Canyon of the Cedar Breaks NM Blanding Ancients NM Mesa Verde - Monument Valley NM Kodacrome Basin SP 200min (150mile) Valley of Hovenweep 40min 70min NM Cortez (24mile) (60mile) Grand Staircase- the Gods 100min Escalante NM Durango Mt. Carmel (92mile) Muley Point Snow Canyon Jct. SP Goosenecks SP Zion NP Kanab Lake Powell Mexican Hat Mesa Verde Rainbow Monument Valley NP Coral Pink Sand Vermillion Page Bridge NM Four Corners Las Vegas - Zion Dunes SP Cliffs NM Navajo Tribal Park Aztec Ruins NM 170min (167mile) Antelope Pipe Spring NM Horseshoe Shiprock Aztec Bend Canyon Mesa Verde - Chinle 200min (166mile) Mt.Carmel Jct. - North Rim Navajo NM 140min (98mile) Kayenta Farmington Monument Valley - Chinle Mesa Verde - Chaco Culture Valley of Fire Page - North Rim Page - Cameron Page - Monument Valley 140min (134mile) 230min (160mile) SP 170min (124mile) 90min (83mile) Grand Canyon- 130min
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Powell Elevation Projections
    September 2021 24-Month Study Projections Lake Powell and Lake Mead: End of Month Elevation Charts Explanation of Hydrologic Scenarios In addition to the September 2021 24-Month Study based on the Most Probable inflow scenario, and in accordance with the Upper Basin Drought Response Operations Agreement (DROA), Reclamation has conducted model runs in September to determine a possible range of reservoir elevations under Probable Minimum and Probable Maximum inflow scenarios. Normally, outside of DROA, Probable Minimum and Probable Maximum model runs are conducted in January, April, August, and October. The Probable Minimum inflow scenario reflects a dry hydrologic condition which statistically would be exceeded 90% of the time. The Most Probable inflow scenario reflects a median hydrologic condition which statistically would be exceeded 50% of the time. The Probable Maximum inflow scenario reflects a wet hydrologic condition which statistically would be exceeded 10% of the time. There is approximately an 80% probability that a future elevation will fall inside the range of the minimum and maximum inflow scenarios. Additionally, there are possible inflow scenarios that would results in reservoir elevations falling outside the ranges indicated in these reports. Consistent with the Upper Basin DROA provisions to protect a target elevation at Lake Powell of 3,525 feet, this September 2021 24-Month Study includes releases from the upstream initial units of the Colorado River Storage Project Act to deliver an additional 181 thousand acre-feet
    [Show full text]
  • Kane County, Utah Resource Management Plan
    Kane County Resource Management Plan Adopted 28 November 2011 KANE COUNTY, UTAH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN For the Physical Development of the Unincorporated Area Pursuant to Section 17-27-301 of the Utah Code ADOPTED 28 NOVEMBER 2011 Should any part of the Kane County Resource Management Plan be determined invalid, no longer applicable or need modification, those changes shall affect only those parts of the Plan that are deleted, invalidated or modified and shall have no effect on the remainder of the Resource Management Plan. This document was prepared by the Division of Community and Economic Development of the Five County Association of Governments under the guidance and direction of the Kane County Resource Development Committee, Kane County Land Use Authority and the Board of County Commissioners. Funding used to prepare this document came from Kane County contributions, a Regional Planning grant from the Utah Permanent Community Impact Board and a Planning and Technical Assistance Grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. - 1 - Kane County Resource Management Plan Adopted 28 November 2011 Acknowledgments Every effective planning process includes a multitude of individuals if it is to be successful. This effort is no different. Many individuals have had an impact upon the preparation and adoption of this Plan. However, most important are the residents of Kane County, who have responded to surveys, interviews, and attended public meetings and hearings. All who did so should be commended for their desire to be a participant in determining the future of Kane County. Some specific individuals and groups have had intensive involvement in the Kane County planning process, and are acknowledged below: Kane County Commission Kane County Land Use Authority Doug Heaton, Chairman Shannon McBride, Land Use Administrator Dirk Clayson Tony Chelewski, Chairman Jim Matson Roger Chamberlain Wade Heaton Kane County Staff Robert Houston Verjean Caruso, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Semidesert* Upland* Mountain
    MLRA 35 - Colorado and Green River Plateaus MLRA 35 - Colorado and Green River Plateaus (Utah portion) Ecological Zone Desert Semidesert* Upland* Mountain Precipitation 5 -9 inches 9 -13 inches 13-16 inches Elevation 3,000 -5,000 4,500 -6,500 5,800 - 7,000 NONE Soil Moisture Regime Typic Ardic Ustic Aridic Aridic Ustic Soil Temp Regime Mesic/Thermic Mesic Mesic Freeze free Days 120-220 120-160 100-130 Percent of Pinyon Percent of Juniper production is Shadscale and production is usually usually greater than blackbrush Notes greater than the Pinyon the Juniper production production 300 – 500 lbs/ac 400 – 700 lbs/ac 100 – 500 lbs/ac 800 – 1,000 lbs/ac *the aspect (north or south) can greatly influence site characteristics. All values in this table are approximate and should be used as guidelines. Different combinations of temperature, precipitation and soil type can place an ecological site into different zones. Rocky Mountains Major Land ResourceBasins and Plateaus Area (MLRA) D35 D36 - Southwestern Plateaus, Mesas, and Foothills D35 - Colorado Plateau Desert 07014035 Miles 35—Colorado Plateau This area is in Arizona (56 percent), Utah (22 percent), New Mexico (21 percent), and Colorado (1 percent). It makes up about 71,735 square miles (185,885 square kilometers). The cities of Kingman and Winslow, Arizona, Gallup and Grants, New Mexico, and Kanab and Moab, Utah, are in this area. Interstate 40 connects some of these cities, and Interstate 17 terminates in Flagstaff, Arizona, just outside this MLRA. The Grand Canyon and Petrified Forest National Parks and the Canyon de Chelly and Wupatki National Monuments are in the part of this MLRA in Arizona.
    [Show full text]